Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

The hits keep on coming. Just last week, in the post, More Clinton Foundation Cronyism – The Deal to Sell Uranium Interests to Russia While Hillary was Secretary of State, I referred to the Clinton Foundation as “a veritable clearinghouse for cronyism masquerading as a charity.” Here’s the full opening paragraph to the piece:
If you looked at the U.S. economy under a microscope, what you’d see is a gigantic cancerous blob of cronyism surrounded by tech startups and huge prisons. If you zeroed in on the cancerous tumor, at the nucleus you’d see a network of crony institutions like the Federal Reserve, intelligence agencies, TBTF Wall Street banks and defense contractors. Pretty close to that, you’d probably find the Clinton Foundation. A veritable clearinghouse for cronyism masquerading as a charity.
Unsurprisingly, I’m not the only one who has come to such a conclusion. In a New York Post article from Sunday that is generating a lot of buzz, Bill Allison, a senior fellow at nonpartisan, nonprofit government watchdog group the Sunlight Foundation, is quoted saying:
It seems like the Clinton Foundation operates as a slush fund for the Clintons.
In case you’re wondering what might prompt Mr. Allison to make such a claim, it’s not just the recent pay-to-play scandals that have emerged. It appears that based on Clinton Foundation tax filings, very little of the charity’s donations are going to, well, charity. In fact, this so called “charity” is so shady, a charity watchdog recently put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits. The New York Post reports:
The Clinton Foundation’s finances are so messy that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits last month.
The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.
The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.
On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons is on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the foundation.
Charity Navigator, which rates nonprofits, recently refused to rate the Clinton Foundation because its “atypical business model . . . doesn’t meet our criteria.”
Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years.
It was the Federalist which first broke the story about the Clinton Foundation spending more money on salaries and travel than grants. It reported the following back in March:
When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel.
Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as “other expenses.” Official IRS forms do not list cigar or dry-cleaning expenses as a specific line item. The Clinton Foundation may well be saving lives, but it seems odd that the costs of so many life-saving activities would be classified by the organization itself as just random, miscellaneous expenses.
Since then, the Clinton Foundation has tried to defend itself, but this is the Federalist’s response, published today:
After a week of being attacked for shady bookkeeping and questionable expenditures, the Clinton Foundation is fighting back. In a tweet posted last week, the Clinton Foundation claimed that 88 percent of its expenditures went “directly to [the foundation’s] life-changing work.”
There’s only one problem: that claim is demonstrably false. And it is false not according to some partisan spin on the numbers, but because the organization’s own tax filings contradict the claim.
In order for the 88 percent claim to be even remotely close to the truth, the words “directly” and “life-changing” have to mean something other than “directly” and “life-changing.” For example, the Clinton Foundation spent nearly $8.5 million–10 percent of all 2013 expenditures–on travel. Do plane tickets and hotel accommodations directly change lives? Nearly $4.8 million–5.6 percent of all expenditures–was spent on office supplies. Are ink cartridges and staplers “life-changing” commodities?
But what if those employees and those IT costs and those travel expenses indirectly save lives, you might ask. Sure, it’s overhead, but what if it’s overhead in the service of a larger mission? Fair question. Even using the broadest definition of “program expenses” possible, however, the 88 percent claim is still false. How do we know? Because the IRS 990 forms submitted by the Clinton Foundation include a specific and detailed accounting of these programmatic expenses. And even using extremely broad definitions–definitions that allow office supply, rent, travel, and IT costs to be counted as programmatic costs–the Clinton Foundation fails its own test.
If you take a narrower, and more realistic, view of the tax-exempt group’s expenditures by excluding obvious overhead expenses and focusing on direct grants to charities and governments, the numbers look much worse. In 2013, for example, only 10 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s expenditures were for direct charitable grants. The amount it spent on charitable grants–$8.8 million–was dwarfed by the $17.2 million it cumulatively spent on travel, rent, and office supplies. Between 2011 and 2013, the organization spent only 9.9 percent of the $252 million it collected on direct charitable grants.
While some may claim that the Clinton Foundation does its charity by itself, rather than outsourcing to other organizations in the form of grants, there appears to be little evidence of that activity in 2013. In 2008, for example, the Clinton Foundation spent nearly $100 million purchasing and distributing medicine and working with its care partners. In 2009, the organization spent $126 million on pharmaceutical and care partner expenses. By 2011, those activities were virtually non-existent. The group spent nothing on pharmaceutical expenses and only $1.2 million on care partner expenses. In 2012 and 2013, the Clinton Foundation spent $0. In just a few short years, the Clinton’s primary philanthropic project transitioned from a massive player in global pharmaceutical distribution to a bloated travel agency and conference organizing business that just happened to be tax-exempt.
Now here’s the money shot:

So are you ready?

Then arrest them stupid.
This is all comoing oout too soon.
She is washing all her dirty laundry to a public with a memory span no longer than a gnats.
By early 2016, she'll be all shiny and new after shedding a tear or three on OpRAH!
But still, I love me a good clinton scandal.
It's that schadenfruede word that I could never wuite spell.
America's No. 1 crime family
I'd rank the Bush family ahead of them. They have the good sense to cover their tracks. Hell, just the money the Bush family made using the Zapata oil platforms as drug transhipment points probably dwarfs what the Klintons have made in their entire lives.
Two competing branches of the CIA/mafia = same 'family.'
She is washing all her dirty laundry to a public with a memory span no longer than a gnats.
DNC Convention = July, 2016
ALL will be forgotten & forgiven so that a female can become POTUS.
NOTHING else matters.
Note that all of these attacks on her are coming from the liberal media and the left. We've never seen this before. They don't want her in the first place. What they really want is the Fauxcahontas, Elizabeth Warren.
..., or O'Malley. Let's face it, 30 years ago Ms Clinton would have been a moderate Republican. The Dems need to rethink their brand.
doop sorry
I will disagree. It's coming from Obama via Valerie Jarrett. The goal of this intra party fight is to make it so Hillary has no chance but to drop out before Iwa. That's why it's happening now. President Peace Prize has until the end of the year to snuff her.
WSJ, NYT, Post, Reuters are all joining. It's not coming from Fox. Not from a Republican affiliated outfit like Karl Rove.
It is a political assassination being driven at the very top. INside not outside.
Anyone who would vote for either choice this election might as well just have a lobotomy and get it over with already.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4wcC2szApI
It's no longer an election as a beauty contest where the winner is determined by vote buying.
Fell off the chair laughing - Hillary in a Beauty Contest. You get a gold star for that one
Presidents are selected, not elected.
I've been saying that too. And Hillary looks more unlikable by the day.
My mom cuts through all the bullshit and why none of this matters: "Hillary is too old to be the first woman president"
Obama is taking her out before the primaries even begin
Sadly, that would raise the exceptional average IQ here in the States.
people have been trying to do just that for decades
http://www.alamo-girl.com/
Do you know where KimK is? Can't find anything on what she thinks of the riots...
6% for office supplies? What the fuck are they using for paper, sheets of silver? I was on the board for a mid sized non profit and we had exactly 4% overhead. The other 96% went directly to our clients. The Clinton's are grifters. Period.
send donations to CASH@clintonemail.com
(YAWN).....Fascism on parade ......move along....nothing to see and nothing can or will be done about it.
Although this revelation TRULY gets the "Thank You Captain Obvious" award for the day.
cue all those bitches who will vote for this cunt cause they beleive that she empowers them...
this country is beyond fucked...
and it is deserved.
I was in NY at the time she was elected to the Senate. Nobody could believe that she could be elected.
My buddy found out his mom voted for her. He was shocked and asked her why. Her reply:
"Because she's a woman."
A certain percentage of the population will still vote for her if a video surfaces of her bludgeoning newborn puppies.
pods
I absolutely loved when running she was raising all hell about Plum Island. Once elected, that sure got shut down, real quick!
National Security, you know. Killed off all the clams and lobsters, created Lyme disease....
Our benevolent overseers
PS Elections 2016. Got a call yesterday form the CA Republican Coalition (or some such weepy horseshit name, but more uplifting) and the lady started on about (maybe 10 words) and I asked her "Why in the world would I vote for a Republican when all they do is support the Democratic agenda?" Her response was "I don't know." said with a great deal of resignation. I wished her a nice day and hung up.
Methinks I wasn't the first one she heard that from .... The tell?
The Republicans unless they go with an outsider (a Ron Paul) will only formally anoint Hillary.
At this juncture, what difference does it make?
I voted for him cuz he's black
https://youtu.be/ZAHDGmupr4E?t=2m36s
I bought this AR because it's black.
Hitlery's new fragrance for the 2016 election...
Check this out...hilarious...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yRJiP4f_EU
What difference does it make?
So we just vote for Jeb. Pay no attention to all the money he got from Common Core. Which he is no longer affiliated with. Because that would look really bad.
Shocked!
And water is wet!
Why is this news? What should be news is that many non-profits behave this exact same way. Why do you think the elites hide their money in foundations?
pods
The Clinton's, fucking Anerica one cigar at a time.
Awesome, it's a slush fund. Now what are you going to do about it?
Slush rhymes with flush which normally means you press the flush button.
That's what the cheats do, they flush it down the toilet, rather than get caught red handed and subsequently branded!
Clinton is a difficult act to follow as he can always say with a straight face : I never had sex with that slush !
Hillary better improve her flush unless she knows how to poker face a congressional committee investigation on "slush meets blush baby blush Hillary".
Gruber some folks. I will be surprised if she is not elected. She meets the criminal requirement.
The Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation – already under scrutiny for foreign donations – is now being accused of fraudulent and possibly criminal mismanagement.
Over the past six weeks, Wall Street financial analyst and investor Charles Ortel has shared with WND, prior to publication, the results of his six-month, in-depth investigation into what he characterizes as an elaborate scheme devised by the Clintons to enrich themselves
Through their foundation, Ortel contends, the Clintons have defrauded an unsuspecting international public of hundreds of millions of dollars for personal gain.
The findings come amid separate charges in Peter Schweizer’s upcoming book “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.”
http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/wall-street-analyst-uncovers-clinton-foundati...
If Americans can't see through this bullshit they deserve Hillary.
youtube 'clinton chronicle' to see how deeply these criminals are in the demonic shitpile. men drug smuggling, murder, influence peddling, extorsion, nafta,,,, rape...christ is this the best we can do? they are so fucking corrupt they should be tried and shot.
Unfortunately that documentary film dates from 1994. 1994!!. For over twenty years the truth about the Klintons has been available for anyone who cares enough to look!
I weep for our once-great nation.
the Clintoon murders was enlightening also, but it's been scrubbed.
might find it on undergrounddocumentaries.com
I hope Mr. Allison steers clear of the pneumatic tools isle at Home Depot and Lowes, most sporting goods stores, all automobiles and most small airplanes.
And I need a Gov't "Watchdog" to tell me the Clinton's and their ilk are corrupt and experts at "gaming the system"? WTF have they been doing the last 25 years? The only thing I would consult the Clinton's on, and ask for advice, is how to launder dirty money into my own pocket; for that they are truly "experts".
www.traderzoo.mobi
Even then, you'd better give them a large cut, lest they steal it all from you.
This is from US code 18:201 (Bribery): "(c) Whoever—
...
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person; "
The sheeple are trained to await instruction from the Ministry of Truth's media that a crime was committed. Those who refuse to think and controlled by those who think for them.
Some sheeple spout US Code like it means something. ;-)
US Code are the rules. The Rule of Law is the American myth. There is prosecutor discretion. The chief prosecutor is the President's lackey. The Rule of Law requires equal application. The reality is Corzine, Clinton, Black
Panthers, TBTF bankers, BetrayUs, etc..
They were just copying an idea that the former President got when he was in Office.They began clamping down on Muslim charities and the way they were designed to funnel money back to not just friends and family but to political and military alliances.The funnelling of money in this case coming from foreign governments and their officials at all levels is basically the same thing.It only uses the former President's Office and Hillary's position as a cloaking device.Nobody can bust us,right?
Doesn't one of the current Supreme Court Justices have a wife who has her own charity?
"We take donations in all denominations." Tackhead. Stealing (in the name of the lord).
House Bush vs. House Clinton. All empires are evil empires.
More of the Clinton distraction.
"Pay attention to the corruption and treasonous criminals over there, while we criminals and treasonous ones over here go about our business of treason and tyranny."
Hint: They are ALL lying, thieving, and murderous scum. All the time.
Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission.
Guillotine them all and let God, Krishna, Xenu, Abraxas, Buddha, Allah, the universe, whatever, sort them out.
My personal favorite god: http://weecdn.com/Uploads/2013/1/13/395/395_4547.jpg
did anyone see where a certain "conservative" , chris ruddy, publisher of "Newsmax" came out what a full throated defense of the clittons?
this is the country we got folks. is it worth keepin'?
Saw it. The 'Republican vs. Democrat' charade however, has been a very $lucrative one for decades already. The Clintons admittedly gave the false dialectic new meaning though. 'Conservative' talk shows and web sites like 'Newsmax' fairly well owe their existence to the Clintons, for none of these entities would be in business if not for the comedy/soap-opera that is the two-party system. It's a $money maker...
The only thing more disgusting than the sociopathic actions of the Clintons, Obamas and Bushs are the masses who think they're the greatest. What a sick, sick society.
What do u mean bill isn't getting a salary off this charity as he is making fees like 3/4 of a million on speeches for the damn thing... But I guess he kicked his addiction to the Vicodin since they don't have so spend so much on the pharmaceuticals these days.
I was wondering why Chelsea Clinton left that $750,000 a year job at NBC, where all she had to do was interview a couple of her parent's 'buddies'. Now I know -- it did not pay as well as her job at the Clinton Foundation!
She doesn't need the money. 'Cause her loser husband is too much of a baller. Especially when hes too busy losing other peoples money. Surprised he hasn't met a nailgun yet.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-03/chelsea-clintons-husband-suffer...
How many us presidents have vatican bank accounts?
Hildabeast wants her own account.
Keep looking at the foundation.
Don't look at the vatican accounts.
This is Long past blame on the Clintons. The 'burden of proof' for these two rests solely on the ignorance of the American public.
Based on the assumption of choice & diebold.
The more this type of scandal gets exposed - the more it will hurt Jeb Bush. The MSM is going to go after the Bush family trying to find anything they can in order to deflect attention from Hillary. Even if the MSM cannot dig up much on Bush, it will make the entire Bush/Clinton mob (i.e. Old Washington insiders) look bad.
Bungalow Bill Clitman testified that Lewinsky's pussy was slushier than Hildebeest's which was more often than not as dry as a prune and as prickly as a pear, matching her temperament.
doop
Mmmm slushees
Read where the CPA and the Auditor are the same firm in Little Rock. How Madoff-esque. Can't wait to find out that the "charity" is the firm's only client. Now where is that rubber stamp?
You mean this CPA firm insanelysane?
"The Little Rock Arkansas branch of BKD, the very branch the Clinton Foundation used for its audit and other accounting services, is currently being sued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for $17.5 million in connection with the failure of the First Southern Bank of Batesville.
Between December 2008 and September 2010, First Southern Bank purchased $23 million in fraudulent district improvement bonds from Little Rock attorney Kevin Lewis. BKD was the bank's accounting firm at the time and the FDIC says the firm failed to do its job.
Lewis was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 2011 and BKD's association with the case certainly became widely known at that time.
Yet, the Clinton Foundation did not make its curiously-timed switch to the firm Price Waterhouse Coopers until 2013.
If the IRS can free itself for a moment from its witch hunt of conservative non-profits, it might want to examine the books of the Clinton Foundation.
With so much smoke, there's likely to be one heck of a fire."
Whole Article in context.
http://www.conservativeblog.org/amyridenour/2015/4/25/clinton-foundation-
From the Rose law firm (which should have just given Hillary the $100k in a bowling bag) to today, it has always been about the money with the Clintons.
That is when Bill wasn't defending himself.
Does this surprise anyone? Only the Clintons can get away with this over the top behavior because the mainstream press will run cover for the Clinton thugs. . . . Imagine if Dick Cheney tried this . . .
He will have to suck his own Dick.
Jail the sinners.
I can't find anything on what Kim K thinks of these silly riots, I just don't know what to do....Maybe Beiber will say something, he is always so, so, well you know, like....
I can't find anything on what Kim K thinks of these silly riots, I just don't know what to do....Maybe Beiber will say something, he is always so, so, well you know, like....
IT expenses were 2%, no wonder why even teenage hackers could have hacked clintonemail.com
I've run a couple of $150 million plus revenue companies. None of these expenses remotely pass the smell test. 5% office supplies is a simple one (unless you're that fuckstick Bernanke buying ink) and only 2% IT?
Salaries and bennies are ridiculously high for a charity org of this size. A deep dive would expose a lot of corruption but even on the surface this is a fucking joke
http://imgur.com/gallery/oYYY5JO
...too late methinks
The Powers That Be are engineering her dimeeze.
Is there a list of the charities (other than the Clintons) that received money?
Probably redux but as of this date none are seeking to run for Pwesidet of Amurka.
Next we’ll probably find out the poster children featured in their Anchor Farm Project, Health Access Initiative, and Healthy Schools Program were all one and the same actor who starred in a recent McDonalds commercial.
Now look folks, when they left the WH they were flat broke. Give them a break.
Hill & her bro are very active in their relief work. The Haitians are being relieved of their gold.
There's no doubt in my mind they've recruited Noodleman to distribute uranium vitamin cholera vaccine laced mud cookies for disease prevention and nutrition.
Doin God's work.
Who spends more on Office Supplies (6%) than Rent (5%)? Something very bogus about those figures.
Office supplies include hookers for Bill.... y'see the figures now add up.
the post is for sub-morons
the times is for morons
the first grandson should be named RICO
ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF WHY MOST OF THE WORLD VIEWS THE US AS EVIL -
Because we elect evil leaders. Americans are in large part stupid - Republicans are no better with their love fest for the Bush Crime family.
Leaders ARE NOT elected. They are chosen for a reason and specific purpose. Never forget that.
Did anyone else read, "Slut fund"? Is Bill up to his old tricks?
To be fair, Bill could probably make just as much money endorsing Viagra or Cialis.