This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

CFR Says China Must Be Defeated And TPP Is Essential To That

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Submitted by Eric Zuesse

CFR Says China Must Be Defeated And TPP Is Essential To That

Wall Street's Council on Foreign Relations has issued a major report, alleging that China must be defeated because it threatens to become a bigger power in the world than the U.S.

This report, which is titled “Revising U.S. Grand Strategy Toward China,” is introduced by Richard Haass, the CFR’s President, who affirms the report’s view that, "no relationship will matter more when it comes to defining the twenty-first century than the one between the United States and China.”

Haass gives this report his personal imprimatur by saying that it "deserves to become an important part of the debate about U.S. foreign policy and the pivotal U.S.-China relationship.” He acknowledges that some people won’t agree with the views it expresses.

The report itself then opens by saying: "Since its founding, the United States has consistently pursued a grand strategy focused on acquiring and maintaining preeminent power over various rivals, first on the North American continent, then in the Western hemisphere, and finally globally.” It praises "the American victory in the Cold War.” It then lavishes praise on America’s imperialistic dominance: "The Department of Defense during the George H.W. Bush administration presciently contended that its 'strategy must now refocus on precluding the emergence of any potential future global competitor'—thereby consciously pursuing the strategy of primacy that the United States successfully employed to outlast the Soviet Union.”

The rest of the report is likewise concerned with the international dominance of America’s aristocracy or the people who control this country’s international corporations, rather than with the welfare of the public or as the U.S. Constitution described the objective of the American Government: “the general welfare.”

The Preamble, or sovereignty clause, in the Constitution, presented that goal in this broader context: "in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”

The Council on Foreign Relations, as a representative of Wall Street, is concerned only with the dominance of America’s aristocracy. Their new report, about “Revising U.S. Grand Strategy Toward China,” is like a declaration of war by America’s aristocracy, against China’s aristocracy. This report has no relationship to the U.S. Constitution, though it advises that the U.S. Government pursue this “Grand Strategy Toward China” irrespective of whether doing that would even be consistent with the U.S. Constitution’s Preamble.

The report repeats in many different contexts the basic theme, that China threatens “hegemonic” dominance in Asia. For example:

“China’s sustained economic success over the past thirty-odd years has enabled it to aggregate formidable power, making it the nation most capable of dominating the Asian continent and thus undermining the traditional U.S. geopolitical objective of ensuring that this arena remains free of hegemonic control.”

The report never allows the matter of America’s “hegemonic control” to be even raised. Thus, “hegemony” is presumed to be evil and to be something that the U.S. must block other nations from having, because there is a "traditional U.S. geopolitical objective of ensuring that this arena remains free of hegemonic control.” In other words: the U.S. isn’t being “hegemonic” by defeating aspiring hegemons. The report offers no term to refer to “hegemony” that’s being practiced by the U.S.

The report presents China as being supremacist, such as what (to quote again from the report) "historian Wang Gungwu has described as a 'principle of superiority’ underwriting Beijing’s 'long-hallowed tradition of treating foreign countries as all alike but unequal and inferior to China.’ Consistent with this principle, Henry Kissinger, describing the traditional sinocentric system, has correctly noted that China 'considered itself, in a sense, the sole sovereign government of the world.’” America’s own ‘Manifest Destiny’ or right to regional (if not global) supremacy is not discussed, because supremacism is attributed only to the aristocracies in other countries, not to the aristocracy in this country.

Rather than the “general welfare,” this document emphasizes "U.S. Vital National Interests,” which are the interests of America’s aristocrats, the owners of America’s large international corporations.

This report urges:

"The United States should invest in defense capabilities and capacity specifically to defeat China’s emerging anti-access capabilities and permit successful U.S. power projection even against concerted opposition from Beijing. … Congress should remove sequestration caps and substantially increase the U.S. defense budget.”

In other words: the Government should spiral upward the U.S. debt even more vertically (which is good for Wall Street), and, in order to enable the increased ‘defense’ expenditures, only ‘defense’ expenditures should be freed from spending-caps. Forget the public, serve the owners of ‘defense’ firms and of the large international corporations who rely on the U.S. military to protect their property abroad.

The report says that China would have no reason to object to such policies: “There is no reason why a China that did not seek to overturn the balance of power in Asia should object to the policy prescriptions contained in this report.” Only a “hegemonic” China (such as the report incessantly alleges to exist, while the U.S. itself is not ‘hegemonic’) would object; and, therefore, the U.S. should ignore China’s objections, because they would be, by definition ‘hegemonic.’ Or, in other words: God is on our side, not on theirs.

"Washington simply cannot have it both ways—to accommodate Chinese concerns regarding U.S. power projection into Asia through 'strategic reassurance' and at the same time to promote and defend U.S. vital national interests in this vast region.”

The authors make clear that U.S. President Obama is not sufficiently hostile toward China: "All signs suggest that President Obama and his senior colleagues have a profoundly different and much more benign diagnosis of China’s strategic objectives in Asia than do we.”

Furthermore, the report ends by portraying Obama as weak on the anti-China front: "Many of these omissions in U.S. policy would seem to stem from an administration worried that such actions would offend Beijing and therefore damage the possibility of enduring strategic cooperation between the two nations, thus the dominating emphasis on cooperation. That self-defeating preoccupation by the United States based on a long-term goal of U.S.-China strategic partnership that cannot be accomplished in the foreseeable future should end.”

The report’s "Recommendations for U.S. Grand Strategy Toward China” urges Congress to "Deliver on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, … as a geoeconomic answer to growing Chinese economic power and geopolitical coercion in Asia,” but it fails to mention that the Obama Administration has already embodied the authors’ viewpoint and objectives in the TPP, which Obama created, and which cuts China out; it could hardly be a better exemplar of their agenda. The authors, in fact, state the exact opposite: that Obama’s objective in his TPP has instead been merely "as a shot in the arm of a dying Doha Round at the World Trade Organization (WTO).” They even ignore that Obama had cut China out of his proposed TPP.

Furthermore, here is what President Obama himself told graduating West Point cadets on 28 May 2014:

"Russia’s aggression toward former Soviet states unnerves capitals in Europe, while China’s economic rise and military reach worries its neighbors. From Brazil to India, rising middle classes compete with us, and governments seek a greater say in global forums.” He was saying that these future military leaders will be using guns and bombs to enforce America’s economic dominance. This is the same thing that the CFR report is saying.

His speech also asserted: “I believe in American exceptionalism with every fiber of my being. … The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation. That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come.” (That even resembles: “Henry Kissinger, describing the traditional sinocentric system, has correctly noted that China 'considered itself, in a sense, the sole sovereign government of the world.’” Obama is, in a sense, saying that America is the “sole sovereign government in the world.”)

He made clear that China is “dispensable,” and that the U.S. must stay on top.

However, there is a difference between Obama and the CFR on one important thing: Obama sees Russia as the chief country over which the U.S. must dominate militarily, and China as the chief country to dominate economically. But in that regard, he is actually old-line Republican, just like his 2012 opponent Mitt Romney is. The only difference from Romney on that is: Obama wasn’t so foolish as to acknowledge publicly a belief that he shared with Romney but already knew was an unpopular position to take in the general election.

Furthermore, whereas the CFR report ignores the public’s welfare, Obama does give lip-service to that as being a matter of concern (just as he gave lip-service to opposing Romney’s assertion that Russia is “our number one geopolitical foe”). After all, he is a ‘Democrat,’ and the authors of the CFR report write instead as if they were presenting a Republican Party campaign document. No ‘Democrat’ can be far-enough to the political right to satisfy Republican operatives. The pretense that they care about the public is therefore far less, because the Republican Party is far more open about its support of, by, and for, the super-rich. Mitt Romney wasn’t the only Republican who had contempt for the lower 47%. But even he tried to deny that he had meant it. In that sense, the CFR’s report is a Republican document, one which, quite simply, doesn’t offer the public the lip-service that Obama does (and which he politically must, in order to retain support even within his own party).

Perhaps on account of the CFR report’s condemning Obama for not being sufficiently right-wing — even though he is actually a conservative Republican on all but social issues (where China policy isn’t particularly relevant) — the report has received no mention in the mainstream press, ever since it was originally issued, back in March of this year. For whatever reason, America’s ‘news’ media ignored the report, notwithstanding its importance as an expression of old-style imperialistic thinking that comes from what many consider to be the prime foreign-affairs mouthpiece of America’s aristocracy — the CFR. The report’s first coverage was on 2 May 2015 at the World Socialist Web Site, which briefly paraphrased it but didn’t even link to it. Then, two days later, Stephen Lendman wrote about the CFR report. He briefly paraphrased it and passionately condemned it. He did link to the report. But he didn’t note the WSWS article, which had first informed the public of the CFR report’s existence — an existence which, until the WSWS article, all of America’s ‘press’ had simply ignored.

The present article is the first one to quote the CFR report, instead of merely to paraphrase and attack it. The quotations that were selected are ones presenting the report’s main points, so that readers here can see these points stated as they were written, rather than merely as I have interpreted them. My interpretation is in addition to, rather than a substitute for, what the report itself says.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity, and of Feudalism, Fascism, Libertarianism and Economics.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 05/05/2015 - 20:50 | 6064041 chubbar
chubbar's picture

They are fast tracking this abomination through congress and won't even let us read it. Believe me, it's written to completely subvert the sovereignty of the US. All of congress needs to be brought up on charges of Treason! If it is so great, LET US READ IT!!!!!

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:09 | 6064097 williambanzai7
williambanzai7's picture

One hundred percent correct in calling it WallStreet's CFR...

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:50 | 6064380 MonetaryApostate
MonetaryApostate's picture

Say goodbye to your sovereignty of nations, their currencies, and their governments.....

Say hello to Globalization & One World Order....

World War III in 3, 2, 1...

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 03:11 | 6064554 Ham-bone
Ham-bone's picture

Clinton, while signing the NAFTA bill, stated that "NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement."

Scoreboard since 1994 says? 

US population +59 million (+20% more Americans)

US manufacturing jobs -5 million (-30% fewer manufacturing jobs)

US debt +$13.4 Trillion (debt to GDP from 64% to 101%)

Real median household income up $1,750 or $83 dollars a year increase ($50.2k to $51.9k)

US corporate profits (after tax) up from $386 b to $1.8 trillion (+475%)

(btw - this is in no way promoting the Republican sellouts as a viable alternative...just stating facts).

Somehow seems the TPP is likely to only accelerate these trends.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 07:28 | 6064902 JessieSharpton
JessieSharpton's picture

You obviously don't get it.

This is supposed to keep world war three at bay.

You either get his or world war three.

Its an offer you cannot refuse.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:50 | 6064234 ZH Snob
ZH Snob's picture

that's what I call closing the barn doors after the horses have run away.

 

are you CFR freaks really that out of touch?  or is this some kind of new psyops?

it's all over but the crying, boys, but what is really puzzling to a useless eater is why you really care at all.  certainly, you've got your diamonds, your matisses, your gold and mansions, but it's never enough, is it?  no, what you really would miss is the power, isn't it?  but it's not like you fought your way to power like a Genghis Khan or something respectable like that.  no, you are thieves and cheaters who can't win a fair fight, so you fix it in your favor and then feel very proud.  you are the type who would rather shoot fish in a barrell than go out to sea with a rod and a reel.

in other words: YOU ARE ALL COWARDS

 

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:24 | 6064305 angel_of_joy
angel_of_joy's picture

So far all CFR characters turned out to be nothing short of amateurish inbred morons. I doubt that the Chinese are too worried about their noises... though they might have a good time occasionally, listening to their lunacies.

More to the point (pg 23):

"...Nothing would better promote the United States’ strategic future and grand strategy toward China than robust economic growth in the United States. Recent economic data suggests some optimism in that regard...." LOL !

QED !!!

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:31 | 6064347 Antifaschistische
Antifaschistische's picture

okay...okay....I finally stopped laughing.   Did someone from the CFR actually infer with a straight face, that the biggest threat China poses to the US is it's military, and to combat that threat we should borrow a few trillion more dollars!!

CFR....brought to you by....THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:38 | 6064358 angel_of_joy
angel_of_joy's picture

Yes they did, for reasons explained above...

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:51 | 6064384 Anusocracy
Anusocracy's picture

Collection of Fucked-up Retards.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 00:08 | 6064546 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

anti... means imply but is generally on track.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 04:35 | 6064786 HowdyDoody
HowdyDoody's picture

CFR is another Zionist outlet.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:00 | 6064045 Ignatius
Ignatius's picture

The CFR.  These would be of the same criminal class that shipped the better part of our manufacturing and associated GDP to China in the first place, right?

As a young man I never predicted that shameless lying, across the board, would become the rule.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:18 | 6064128 williambanzai7
williambanzai7's picture

Precisely, these are not people who have a vision of a better foreign policy for the American people.

This is a den of lizards, founded by David Bilderfellars family, to find ever increasing ways to skew American foreign policy in such a manner as to fatten the bank accounts of the oligarchs of the upper East Side. Hence it makes perfect Kissingerian sense to ship all of America's manufacturing prowess to its supposed chief rival, so long as it buys MIC enabling T-Bills.

It makes further sense to stoke fascist tendencies in Japan in order to provoke another military conflict for the MIC to gorge on.

At this point everything is indeed transparent only because you can see straight though it.

No wonder the CFR has an Upper East Side zipcode.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:48 | 6064231 ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

The CFR and the NWO

Kissinger, Bush, Ron Paul, Cheney, and Hil Clinton.

Ron Paul at 2:12

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_gj1uZ6194

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:07 | 6064281 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

CFR anything = Pure Hegel.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 07:35 | 6064916 Spanky
Spanky's picture

wb7 wrote,

"This is a den of lizards, founded by David Bilderfellars family..."

So true, but only half the story -- JP put his two cents into its founding as well.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 08:59 | 6065161 geno-econ
geno-econ's picture

CFR report has Neocon  Richard Hass thinking throughout.  Ironic that Nixon/Kissinger opened up China to undermine USSR and in the end it undermined the US and created an economic/financial deficit catastrophy.  Now we have two major rivals--China and Russia.   So much for exceptionalism.  

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:41 | 6064207 Lost Word
Lost Word's picture

TPP is necessary so that China will Win.

Part of the NWO Banksters plan to destroy the USA

so that Jews can rule the world.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:57 | 6064254 bid the soldier...
bid the soldiers shoot's picture

 

Aren't they doing that now?

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 23:14 | 6064441 MonetaryApostate
MonetaryApostate's picture

I think there will likely be a power struggle on the European side of the fence, but knowing the elite, this result in a lot of population control, and that will entail many people dying....  (I can see it all about to escalate now.)

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 00:14 | 6064550 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

zionists and yes they are.

but they are doing all one can imagine to give birth to the antithesis (vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle, And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?).

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 02:15 | 6064689 bid the soldier...
bid the soldiers shoot's picture

You prolly have noticed that the Jews have never ever told anyone what they were chosen to do.

Greenspan, Bernanke, Yellen, Fischer.  

You don't have to be Eistein to figure it out.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 03:12 | 6064724 cheech_wizard
cheech_wizard's picture

32° 35' 4.64" N, 35° 11' 0.58" E


Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:00 | 6064253 El Oregonian
El Oregonian's picture

It is much, much worse than simply lying. These baby-eating luciferian demons have succeeded only in creating a living hell requiring that the rest of humanity must suffer through. Fortunately, this isn't our final home, we're just passing through.

But for them, it will only degrade into a very real hell that they have trapped themselves into and where there is no escape. Sad really.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 23:15 | 6064455 MonetaryApostate
MonetaryApostate's picture

Unfortunately the bad guys don't play fair, there will all sorts of shit released on humanity as a reult too.. =(

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:06 | 6064279 illyia
illyia's picture

As a young man I never predicted that shameless lying, across the board, would become the rule.

I did.

First we eat our children

Then we eat each other

Then we eat ourselves...

It doesn't help to say that...either.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 20:53 | 6064054 chubbar
chubbar's picture

PS, who give's a flying fuck what those asshats at the CFR think? Who the hell are they to set policy or even have a voice? Does anyone know how to get on that committee? Let them run for election if they want to set policy.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:06 | 6064092 suteibu
suteibu's picture

Think tanks like the CFR (and others) along with the foundations which support them are the policy makers...the shadow government.  To get on the committee, you must be vetted by the higher authorities. 

"It's a big club...and you ain't in it."  - G. Carlin

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:31 | 6064167 Pure Evil
Pure Evil's picture

I think it should be changed to:

 

"It's a big club........and you're about to get your ass pounded with it"

 

See WB7 pictorial above for further details.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:34 | 6064180 suteibu
suteibu's picture

Carlin went on to say..."and by the way, it's the same club they use to beat you over the head with every day..."

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 04:19 | 6064770 August
August's picture

CFR membership is by invitation only. 

If you decline the CFR's invitation, your career trajectory will undergo certain changes, as Paul Craig Roberts and Catherine Austin Fitts can attest.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:07 | 6064096 New Kid
Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:13 | 6064118 MrTouchdown
MrTouchdown's picture

They purchase the politicians who warm the seat for them.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:53 | 6064242 bid the soldier...
bid the soldiers shoot's picture

 

The CFR is prolly just scamming huge piles of unreported cash donations from rich braindead Republicans with follow-up personal letters and expensive lunches. 

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 23:47 | 6064516 Real Estate Geek
Real Estate Geek's picture

Red team baa-aaa-aaad.

Blue team not baa-aaa-aaad.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 02:25 | 6064694 bid the soldier...
bid the soldiers shoot's picture

No.

 Red team and blue team are BOTH VERY VERYBAD.

Blue team not as brain dead and not as easily scammed.

Red team belives there was a tree with an apple and a snake.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 09:14 | 6065237 Ginsengbull
Ginsengbull's picture

That book rocks.

 

It was a talking sake.

 

Don't forget the naked chick, and the dude who put a fig leaf on his schlong.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 13:04 | 6066228 bid the soldier...
bid the soldiers shoot's picture

 

Yup.  

Every winter when the days start to get longer again, they celebrate by eating plates of Snake and Kidme Pie.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 23:07 | 6064434 Questan1913
Questan1913's picture

"PS, who give's a flying fuck what those asshats at the CFR think? Who the hell are they to set policy or even have a voice? Does anyone know how to get on that committee? Let them run for election if they want to set policy."

Those "asshats" have been running the US government, media "think" tanks, corporate board rooms and all other important institutions in the US since the 1930's, predating your birth I assume.

For those few of you here to learn, I submit this link:

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/cfr-members.htm

Scroll down to near the bottom to  the heading "Council on Foreign Relations and The New World Order" and read to the bottom of page, then go back up to the top and go through the entire listing fof CFR agents salted within the highest reaches of government, corporate America and of course the media. rom the Clinton administration years,

 

I guarantee you will receive the equivalent of a BA and Doctorate Degree in who governs the US, where they are placed, and what their goals are.                            Spoiler: Your Enslavement


Tue, 05/05/2015 - 20:54 | 6064055 Usurious
Usurious's picture

 

 

so it shall be war........

welfare and warfare.........what the banks want, the banks get........

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 20:57 | 6064065 Goldilocks
Goldilocks's picture

For fuck's sake.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:06 | 6064093 Missing_Link
Missing_Link's picture

"Perhaps on account of the CFR report’s condemning Obama for not being sufficiently right-wing — even though he is actually a conservative Republican on all but social issues ..."

 

Seriously?  That's about the nuttiest sentence I've read in my life.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:11 | 6064110 UselessEater
UselessEater's picture

The Council on Foreign Relations, as a representative of Wall Street, is concerned only with the dominance of America’s aristocracy.

 

you missed this sentence... its really cute

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:43 | 6064210 Lost Word
Lost Word's picture

Jewish aristocracy

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 20:59 | 6064072 Cityzerosix
Cityzerosix's picture

this arrogance is archaic but their weapons arn't. Anywhere left where you can run and hide

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 20:59 | 6064076 J Pancreas
J Pancreas's picture

Go back to the Eisenhower Minimum. No need for large occupation oriented armies in the 21st century. Massive nuclear deterrence is the only way to shrink the Military Industrial Complex and tell the plebeians they're safe without utterly bankrupting whats left of Amuurica's wealth.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:01 | 6064082 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

The U.S. can't even make its own transformers anymore, so all China has to do is not supply them.

E.M.P. nukes at high altitude over the U.S., then say "so solly, awl out of stock!".

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:09 | 6064285 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

"Just In Time" genocide.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:07 | 6064089 Dr. Venkman
Dr. Venkman's picture

The Preamble, or sovereignty clause, in the Constitution, presented that goal in this broader context: "in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity."

 

The sovereignty clause???

 

The Preamble is simply a preamble. Otherwise you get silly statements like: "as the U.S. Constitution described the objective of the American Government: “the general welfare.”"

 

Edit: as to the CFR - simply sounds like a regurgitation of the Grand Chessboard. They laid this out years ago.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:08 | 6064098 blindman
blindman's picture

the main plot is there is no coherent plot,
that remains the central plot and plan;
and we sorrow that this does not satisfy?
.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:23 | 6064146 blindman
blindman's picture

oh, there is a main plot.
the plot is to destroy personal,
local and national sovereignty once
and for all; rename it terrorism
and insanity. aka, chaos and slavery to
the whims of unknown tyrants from near and afar.
.
man, the world sucks right now but
i can't let it ruin me; can't let the
demons eat my soul in broad daylight.
not on my watch brother.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:08 | 6064099 Chupacabra-322
Chupacabra-322's picture

CFR, IMF, BIS & World Bank. Please meet the AIIB & the BRIC's. Now FUCK OFF!

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:26 | 6064154 UselessEater
UselessEater's picture

Maybe check out the links on this podcast first....

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-297-china-and-the-new-world-order/

 

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:09 | 6064105 Vendetta
Vendetta's picture

Sounds like CFR wants to destroy America more than most foreign nations

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:16 | 6064122 Usurious
Usurious's picture

The Blood never Dried. A Peoples History of the British Empire

''John Newswinger decodes Anglophile rhetoric which glorifies the true costs of British Imperilialism.......

> "Giving independence to India" was the result of a long anti-colonial struggle. After WWII the British could not maintain control. PR spin would like the world to beleive all was done on British terms i.e.,coaching Indians to "govern themselves".

> Until the late 50's, Struggles ensued between the British & US over control of colonial possessions. Attempts were made to develop nuclear weapons independent from US technology. The Brits gave the program up & allied thmesleves with the USA. Often mainstream british/american Historians depict the struggle as a Cold War Struggle USA V USSR e.g., Nasser was intitially supported by the CIA to depose British puppet King Farouk.

Newswinder sites several case studies of British rule,including Ireland, Middle East, the Carribean & Africa

Very interesting read. I highly recommend this book. Lessons could be learned for the future of Pax Americana as well. If history tells us anything Empires always fall & create an unstable environment with violence & instability.''

http://www.amazon.com/The-Blood-Never-Dried-Peoples/dp/1905192126

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:16 | 6064123 suteibu
suteibu's picture

The CFR report assumes that the TPP simply needs to pass the US Congress.  There are many Asian nations doing big business with China who may not be willing to sign in the end.  The AIIB, along with other Chinese initiatives, may offer more for them than the TPP (nice timing on China's part) tying them to a declining empire for generations. 

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:32 | 6064172 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

You are close, but in reality Asia and China are red herrings. They are to keep people looking "over there," while Zion bends us "over here."

Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission.

 

"Don't believe the hype. It's Zionist tripe."

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:16 | 6064125 ThroxxOfVron
ThroxxOfVron's picture

IMHO, building of Thorium liquid-salt reactors and concomitant Fischer-Tropsch process liquid synth fuels production facilities would be a better investment of Taxpayer funds.

Cheap renewable electricity and liquid petroleum alternatives will just as valuable for the US Military as it will for the domestic economy.

Solving US economic dependence on imported petroleum will also crush the price of crude and the foreign despots that control the majority of the petroleum resources with it.

...and cheapen energy for all other economies left trapped in the outdated petro-economics paradigm...

Thorium liquid-salt nuclear is an economic/security triple play or better: cheap electricity and a by-product gasoline/diesel/heating oil replacement infrastructure, depression of crude prices cheapen costs for petroleum users resulting in production costs deflation...   

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:37 | 6064190 ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

At the end of the day it's more about cheap energy than printing dollars that fuels a growing economy.

On the other hand there are vested interests in the conventional nuclear and thermal coal industries that can buy a lot of political clout to keep it from happening.

One day these jokers want a NWO and the next day they don't. My guess is that it's all merely about the oligarchs coming terms for the division of the spoils.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:51 | 6064239 ThroxxOfVron
ThroxxOfVron's picture

The difference between a functioning clean renewable Thorium/Fischer-Tropsch economy and a resource constrained and pollutive petroleum/fired coal economy will be as stark as Jetsons and Flintstones...

Throium plants can also burn nuclear wastes for fuel and solve the dangerously unresolved problem of what to do with tons of conventional nuclear cycle 'waste' as well...

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:22 | 6064140 rsnoble
rsnoble's picture

Oh, so is their latest excuse to pass TPP?  You watch, they pass it and it will more likely finish what NAFTA started.

I guess if the motherfuckers would let us read the gdm thing we would know, huh?

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:33 | 6064177 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

You are wise.

Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:22 | 6064141 cn13
cn13's picture

In case you didn't know,  the Council Of Foreign Relations is the real power behind the presidency.

Obama merely dances as instructed and then heads out to the golf course.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:26 | 6064152 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

Sorry, but Zion "is the real power behind the presidency."

The CFR is just Zion's branch management team.

Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:51 | 6064385 SixIsNinE
SixIsNinE's picture

so, I "grokked" that I'm a slave, i.e. Morpheus to Neo, but they were on Team Zion and it seemed like the Architect was not pleased with Neo, Morpheus, Trinity & Team Zion....There is still much to learn about the MATRIX....shine the Light, please :)

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 08:35 | 6065064 GlobalCtzn
GlobalCtzn's picture

Matrix trilogy decoded for you.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvKEwr0iNA0

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:23 | 6064145 kchrisc
kchrisc's picture

Based on my reading the TPP is just another step toward world governmnet by Zion, and a further step in demolishing the plundered DC US and American Country.

But, then I could be wrong.

Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission.

What I wrote of it recently:

Then there is TPP. I have not been following TPP much, as even though I could smell it, there are only so many hours in the day for tracking their machinations. Then I came across this research by a Joe Firestone. His focuses is on sovereignty issues in TPP, especially related to the "Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) tribunals [courts]." Basically under TPP a new world court system would be set up to punish governments that stray from the their agreement to TPP. And, as always, the powers of ISDS are written in such a way as to make them effectively a court system over us all, all the citizens of the world.

Things get more interesting when one learns that the TPP requires fines/lost profits be paid in "a “freely usable currency” as specified by the IMF"

As Joe writes:

"I don’t see anything in the TPP investment chapter requiring that damages be awarded by the Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) tribunals in the sovereign currency of nations incurring damage awards for lost profits, but only that they be awarded in a “freely usable currency” as specified by the IMF."

So I go here to one of the few documents that may shed a little light on the topic, and find:

"...freely usable currency means “freely usable currency” as determined by the International Monetary Fund under its Articles of Agreement."

Okay, so that's the groundwork, now comes the steamroller from the preamble of the TPP:

"Parties have agreed to the following text in the preamble:
'Recognizing the inherent right to regulate and resolving to preserve the flexibility of the Parties to protect legitimate public welfare objectives, such as public health, safety, the environment, the conservation of living or non-living exhaustible [oil folks] natural resources, and public morals.'"

Doesn't sound like a "trade-agreement," but a farm and ranch agreement between various farms and ranches for the benefit of the Big-Z ranch.

So in summary: TPP gives Zion formal sovereignty over us all, and imposes the SDR fiat-currencies on same so that we, their farm animals, will continue to owe and pay forever on debts predicated on wealth stolen from us, the people--World Government.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:30 | 6064168 suteibu
suteibu's picture

There seems to be only 3 of the dozens of articles in the TPP which are trade related.  The rest, as you say, merely establishes a regional supranational authority with powers that negate sovereignty in the member states.  The so-called "stakeholders" in the negotiations are corporate lawyers, lobbyists, and bankers even though it will change life for a fourth of the planet's population.  The Atlantic version of the TPP is currently in negotiations.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:27 | 6064159 q99x2
q99x2's picture

It seems like the CFR is a bit too late. Their greed pedicted their downfall. No CFR or NWO can survive a banksters greed. They are like people that have lost their path because of their actions and now find that there is no way back. They thought lawlessness would allow them to gather more money and make them more powerful instead it has left them in the past as the future moves on without them.

Arrest them. Arrest Lloyd Blankfein. Shut down Goldman Sachs. Arrest Jamie Dimon too.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:38 | 6064196 Troy Ounce
Troy Ounce's picture

 

Yes. Yes. If only The Great Unwashed would give a damn.

 

 

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:39 | 6064203 me or you
me or you's picture

The traitors and the dual-citizens who have hijacked this country are putting the American people in the path of extinction.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:43 | 6064212 Cloud9.5
Cloud9.5's picture

Anybody can make a plan.  Getting it implemented is something else.  I for one have no intention of getting on a train for Auschwitz.  Americans bought enough guns in two months to outfit the Chinese and Indian armies.  The peeps are ready.  http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/01/americans-buy-enough-guns-in-las...

 

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 21:48 | 6064229 monad
monad's picture

The rats are going down with the ship they ate their way through. Good.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:03 | 6064245 earleflorida
earleflorida's picture

This is the biggest 'POS' foray of obtuse propagandized 'BS' I've ever read. Period!

Truths, half truths, and outright lies spun in a NWO centrifuge!

Ever since Nixon sent Kissinger (Mr. Constructive Ambiguity?) to China, preparing for his first of many visits with Mao in 1972,... the Chinese have been on a tear! Bush #43 welcomes China into the WTO on Dec. 11, 2001, exactly three[3] months after 9/11 ?   WTF!?!

Victoria Nuland single-handedly pushes Russia into China's arms, and now we have a formidable-alliance with ~4x the population and ~4x the land mass of an isolated USSA? Why?

Since the 70s, the NWO had set-n-stone China as the Giant-Yellow-Race-CARD[?]' in control of this shrinking giant dwarf of a linear sphere. All that was missing was Russia untying the proverbial 'Gordian-Eurasian-Knot'!-- in which the CFR & Co. Nuland pro-created.

It unbelievable for me to make this statement, but... looking at all the USSSs foreign policy blunders with baby Bush doubling the US debt in two-terms to ~$8 tn, and Obama doubling Bush's debt to ~ $16 Tn, with the next two-term ([or, one term per president in times of turmoil? each 4 years [?]) doubling the deficit to ~$32tn-- we are burnt-toasted BANKRUPT'd!

Ye`all know what happens to a country that defaults on its debt?

Summary: America has been set-up to fail, by our last nine presidents, since Kennedy's assaination!

Think Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush#41, Clinton, Bush#43, Obama, and the next female[?latino] president that will shake-n-bake what's left of a once 'Great Country'?!?

But, remember the #11 which is symbolically a ominous omen could very well mean a Thatcher? and, a Latino...[?]

That's all... over

Bombs Away:-)

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:03 | 6064272 SirBarksAlot
SirBarksAlot's picture

The CFR needs to update their name to something a little more precise, like, "The Council for Military and Petroleum Contracts" or "The Council for Foreign Invasions" or "The Council of Important Assholes."

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 06:52 | 6064857 g'kar
g'kar's picture

CFR- Completely Fuck the Republic

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:22 | 6064273 reader2010
reader2010's picture

Please nuke China right now before it's too late.  The guys who created the Fed created the CFR in the following year right after the Fed. Interestingly, the guy who was there to supervise Nixon's first China visit in person also happens to be the Honorary Chairman of the CFR. here is the link: http://www.cfr.org/staff/b987

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:05 | 6064276 gwar5
gwar5's picture

Wasn't that long ago the dearies at CFR were taking action so that the 'arrogant'  'unilateral' USA would get out of the way and make room for a new multipolar world allowing up-and-comers like China to be equal players, hence, WTO and "Most Favored Nation" status, etc.

 

That was back in the Clinton-Rubin days. So, where is Herr Rubin now?  Co-Chair of the CFR and Bilderberger star member, of course. The worm has turned.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:18 | 6064309 MASTER OF UNIVERSE
MASTER OF UNIVERSE's picture

The United States of America is in the shitter because of the overarching hubris of the Council on Foreign Relations, and they motherfucking well know it too. Frankly, the Council on Foreign Relations is a fully defunct entity, and O'Bummer, and the Whore House advisors, know full well that the CFR is antiquated, overtly fascist, and damaging to the reputation of the USA on an internationalist basis. What is manifesting here is a last gasp for political air that the CFR is not going to get when brighter Americans than the NeoCONs set their minds to the task of diplomacy rather than World War Three. The USA cannot afford to act aggressively on the World stage because the entire Global village is at the ready to slap American politicians down if they even think of attempting any of the lunacy proposed by the CFR, or their minions.

The days of American supremacy are finished forever for the Russian Federation, China, and India. The USA is a fully insolvent bankrupt country with a so-called 'ruling class' that is slowly starting to realize that they don't matter anymore, and the jig is up. America is viewed as a failed hegemonic state with no future aside from being a necropolis once the entirety of the metropolis decays from the poor vision that was promulgated by the Council on Foreign Relations to begin with. In brief, the CFR hubris and hegemony has already destroyed the USA from within. World leaders are well aware of that fact and the bluster emanating out of the CFR.

 

NOTE: American Banksters can start leaping from tall buildings if they really believe they are SUPERMAN for all I fucking give a rat's ass.

 

JUMP motherfuckers!

 

JUMP!!

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:28 | 6064335 bankonzhongguo
bankonzhongguo's picture

Speaking as a China Hand since 1984, I have forgotten more about China than most of these MTV generation CFR control freaks will ever know.

China is an ancient civilization with a deep set of cultural values and mythology that most outsiders will never know.

If it helps, think of China as Israel, but with a billion grinning Zionists.

If you are not part of the tribe then you are a fish in the sea. A barbarian at the Wall. A crumb on the table.

The West's "engagement" strategy has been fun. A fantasy that somehow all those US companies and banks would be selling INTO China.

Put despite its 100 year spiritual depression, China still plays Chess instead of Checkers.

China, Inc. is also in favor of the TPP because any increased outside influence helps support its iridescent desires and other seething nationalism. You could nuke half the country and nobody would notice.

If they are building islands to defend the Spratlys what is the next 100 years going to bring?

Take note to the way the British spirited away with China's silver via the Opium Wars. The same model is already in effect between the US and China for the last 20 years.

What will the next 20 bring?

The CPS reads these CFR missives and just laughs.

When the machines return to the USA you know folks are serious about countering China.

Until then, it seems the CFR and the idiot few that smoke that hopium of injecting inflation to break China into pieces are children truly lost in the wilderness.

TPP is about a global corporatocracy, which China already plays just fine.

 

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 22:58 | 6064408 Joe A
Joe A's picture

"CFR Says EU Must Be Defeated And TTIP Is Essential To That".

Well, the EU is already defeated but must be controlled. TTIP will do that for ya.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 23:30 | 6064472 BoPeople
BoPeople's picture

If I was China (and I am not), based on the CFR's words, I would look at the American aristocracy as a potenial threat and consider ways of possibly eliminating that threat. Once eliminated the two countries could co-exist in a mutually beneficial relationship.

Never heard of that Haass guy, but he strikes me as a moron of the first class.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 23:32 | 6064485 victorher
victorher's picture

 "The United States should invest in defense capabilities and capacity specifically to defeat China’s emerging anti-access capabilities"

 

Should US invest eeven more money than it do now? The Military Lobby is completely crazy.

The biggest trouble for Peace is called United States of America. 

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 01:34 | 6064665 bart12
bart12's picture

The Military Industrial Complex are all listed in Wall St.. All are for profit and riches of their CEO.. We are pretty much screwed when our bullets and missiles cost 10 times more than what the China and Russia produce. We will go bankrupt with defense budget if we don;t address the cost equation.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 23:48 | 6064519 Bemused Observer
Bemused Observer's picture

Yeah, and when OUR economy collapses, we'll all be using Yuan in our black markets because our dollar won't be worth shit.

 

The good news is that TPTB won't admit defeat until the very end, so you can all pay off your debts with soon-to-be-worthless dollars.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 23:56 | 6064530 highwaytoserfdom
highwaytoserfdom's picture

Criminal  Fuc#ing Retards

Citizen   Fuc#ing Rapist

Criminal  Front Racket

 

CFR members and past members should have there pensions and assets stripped prior to prison for treason.

Tue, 05/05/2015 - 23:57 | 6064534 Aussiekiwi
Aussiekiwi's picture

America seems fixated on starting wars anywhere it can in the world and fighting imaginary terrorist threats internally and externally around the world, anything to allow its Military to bribe congress into increasing its defense budget yet again.

As part of this the US is also busy carrying out economic terrorism worldwide, I don't particularly mind as there is nothing any of us can do about it, but I would love to come back in 200 years and see what they have done to the world by then.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 00:15 | 6064553 I Write Code
I Write Code's picture

TPP is neofascist crap.  This is crap even for CFR.  Crap, crap, crap.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 00:54 | 6064615 RichardParker
RichardParker's picture

China is “dispensable,” and that the U.S. ...

Oh pulease...  Obama is dispensible.  This guy is such a douche bag.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 01:04 | 6064629 AmarUtu
AmarUtu's picture

Too little too late, you sold all your major economic and manufacturing for cheaper consumables, you cannot turn back time on this one, just go have a walk through Detroit, that's your future, with the only lights on at Wall St and Fed Reserve whoring the fake ponzi market.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 06:34 | 6064840 conscious being
conscious being's picture

Asian and other Pacific nations need to sign on to TPP for it to be worth anything. Other than Australia, Canada, NZ and Japan, most won't.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 02:35 | 6064701 basho
basho's picture

"China must be defeated because it threatens to become a bigger power in the world than the U.S."

neo-con fascist crap.

brought to you by the same folks that supporting the 3rd reich.

all exceptional americans.

 

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 03:07 | 6064714 Element
Element's picture

The amusing thing is that both sides in that cartoon are getting a figment of their own imaginations and pretend to themselves it is significant. Both sides are thoroughly completely deluded. What each really wants is the products they can trade for that, which they actually need. The exchange mechanism is of no consequence in the trade, it is just a means to enable the trade to be settled in the most simple and rapid convenient way (hence in exchangable digits now). It is the trade that people really want, and need. That's what makes you feel 'affluent' and seem 'rich', or well to do. You can have all the paper or PM bars that you want, or can accrue, but if no one wants to trade for those, or finds them too inconvenient, you're not 'rich' at all, you are simply broke and totally deluded that you are not, for now.

It's what you have, and also can trade, in a market, and deliver, that matters.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 03:00 | 6064718 damicol
damicol's picture

Absolutely typical of a fucking  arrogant fucking jew boy.

this us precisely the type to round ip and stuff in a fucking gas oven when it all comes crashing down. Andd its cunts like this that cause all the crashing

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 04:54 | 6064794 HowdyDoody
HowdyDoody's picture

"State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era. In the age of globalization, states should give up some sovereignty to world bodies in order to protect their own interests"

Richard Haass (2006).

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2006/02/21/2003294021

There it is from the horses mouth - TPP is about giving up sovereignty.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 04:57 | 6064795 HowdyDoody
HowdyDoody's picture

Even better, it appears that an anti-Israel boycott provision has appeared in TPP.

http://prorevnews.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/now-anti-israel-boycott-provisi...

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 04:02 | 6064754 Batman11
Batman11's picture

What made China the country it is today?

The US and the West off-shoring all its manufacturing there.

Do those in charge have even the slightest idea what they are doing?

 

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 05:18 | 6064803 Batman11
Batman11's picture

Wall Street's Council on Foreign Relations cannot see the biggest danger to the US because ......

That danger is Wall Street.

Wall Street's first suicide mission in 2008 nearly took down the US and the Western financial system.

Now derivatives are backed by US tax payers, Wall Street's next suicide attempt will take the US with it.

 

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 06:46 | 6064853 lordbyroniv
lordbyroniv's picture

So we ship all our jobs to China and than moan that they are growing strong.

 

What a dumb country we are.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 08:10 | 6064979 Quinvarius
Quinvarius's picture

The US economy exists at China's pleasure.  Nothing in my house has made in the USA stamped on it.  These guys are some seriously arrogant dickheads to count US factories overseas as US economic power, and then make an assault against country that actually owns these factories.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 08:36 | 6065066 Brazen Heist
Brazen Heist's picture

TPP was always about a feeble and pathetic attempt at "isolating" China. The famous "pivot" towards Asia.

America's rulers are behaving like spoilt little bitches, feeling "entitled" to poke their unwanted noses all over the world.

How dare China project power in its own backyard!

How dare Russia stand up to our attempt at destabilizing Ukraine!

How dare Iran pursue a nuclear deterrent!

How dare Al Qaeda go against us (after we funded and trained them)!

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 09:03 | 6065182 realWhiteNight123129
realWhiteNight123129's picture

US has already lost a whgile ago. US is in debt to the neck with CHina, US gold reserves go down and China go up. US is going out in a whimper. The CFR guy has not realized that the United States has been destroyed from within by the Financial Aristocracy.... funny.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 09:42 | 6065348 foghorn leghorn
foghorn leghorn's picture

If the elite were serious about hurting China economically they would have pulled all the jobs from there and brought them back home where they belong. To me it sounds like they are afraid that China may seize their assets in the same way that they stole it from us the American people.

All the elite really want is to force us the poor to pay for their own protection. They are so pathetic and greedy that like Socrates said they won't even bother to spend one penny for their defence. When I say defense I mean the companies that are located in places like China which in my opinion deserve no protection whatsoever from the USA. After all they are expatriots.

 

 

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 09:46 | 6065373 Firewood
Firewood's picture

"Since its founding, the United States has consistently pursued a grand strategy focused on acquiring and maintaining preeminent power over various rivals, .."  And now it's over.

 

Every disease will sooner or later kill the carrier or be cured. The Anglozionazi Empire of Chaos, its alpha tribe slash money changing sect and snaggle tooth employer of sub working class ghouls-Petnacon Kill Industries are all getting by on borrowed time.

 

Go gently into the night like the Britlander Empire before you or be destroyed.

Wed, 05/06/2015 - 09:53 | 6065401 SystemOfaDrown
SystemOfaDrown's picture

Who is CFR kidding? Like GATT and NAFTA, TTP will further rape and pillage U.S. economy.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!