This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Caught On Tape: Stunned Reporter Grills State Department Why Hillary's Breaches Won't Be Investigated
In the past several weeks, not a day has passed without a new scandal surfacing revealing Clinton's lack of judgment whether it involves her abuse of email protocol, or some previously undisclosed financial relation between either Hillary Clinton or the Clinton foundation and an outside donor. The most egregious revelation took place a few days ago when it emerged that the Democratic presidential candidate had breached her agreement with the White House to name all foundation donors during her tenure as secretary of state.
Specifically, as Reuters reported, Clinton had promised the federal government that the Clinton Foundation and its associated charities would name all donors annually while she was the nation's top diplomat. "She also promised that the charities would let the State Department's ethics office review beforehand any proposed new foreign governments donations."
In March, the charities confirmed to Reuters for the first time that they had not complied with those pledges for most of Clinton's four years at the State Department.
The implication is that foreigners banned from donating to U.S. political campaigns could and likely did curry favor with her by giving to the charity that bears her name. The charities accepted new donations from at least six foreign governments while Clinton was secretary of state: Switzerland, Papua New Guinea, Swaziland, Rwanda, Sweden and Algeria. And, of course, Ukraine.
The charities never told the State Department about the new and increased donations. In two instances, the charities said this was the result of "oversights"; for the other six, they said those donations were exceptions to the agreement for various reasons.
The charities also stopped publishing full donor lists from 2010 onwards; the annually updated list omitted donors to the foundation's flagship health initiative.
But the most shocking development took place yesterday when the US State Department, via spokesman Jeff Rathke, told reporters that while it "regrets" that it did not get to review the new foreign government funding, it does not plan to look into the matter further, spokesman Jeff Rathke said on Thursday.
"The State Department has not and does not intend to initiate a formal review or to make a retroactive judgment about items that were not submitted during Secretary Clinton's tenure," Rathke told reporters.
And while the objective, unbiased media would have been up in arms had this gross abuse of government privileges and clear pandering to foreign interests occurred under a Republican candidate, there has been barely a peep from said media as far as Hillary's involvement is concerned.
One person, however, did speak up: that was AP's Matt Lee who asked why the State Department wouldn't investigate further to determine if the tens of millions of dollars in donations had influenced her, and thus the US State Department's, decisions in the 2011-2013 period.
Rathke's response: there is no evidence that these donations to the Clinton charities had any effect on Clinton's decisions. “We’re not going to make a retroactive review on these cases and we will not make a retroactive judgment,” he said.
Of course, the circular logic involved is so twisted even hardened, conflicted government apparatchiks would not fail to recognize that there is no way to make a determination if said previously undisclosed donations had influenced her decisions without a further inquiry, an inquiry the State Department refuses to make because it assumes that it would find nothing.
Lee quickly noted this told Rathke that “the reason you are not aware of anything is because the building is refusing to go back and look at it to see if there is anything that might raise a flag."
What followed was 6 minutes of squirming that would make even the most hard-core Clinton supporter blush red with embarrassment at the farce and the corruption evident at every single level of government, especially when certain pre-approved (by Wall Street) candidates are involved.
The full exchange below.
- 105617 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


Hillary is too big to jail.
Well, these reptilians bleed like the rest of us, so there's that.
Why won't you ask these questions, you don't want to know the answer to?
With the outcome already decided in favor of Mrs. Clinton in the next presidential elections, this type of nonsense is just focused on keeping entertained the brute and ignorant masses in America. Presidents in the US are selected, NOT elected.
Boston Tea Party (12/16/1773) = INSURANCE FRAUD
A read for the political season. This, along with the Moral Intuitions Theory, helps explain why libs and cons are libs and cons.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-01/euhs-esl012406.php
When it comes to forming opinions and making judgments on hot political issues, partisans of both parties don't let facts get in the way of their decision-making, according to a new Emory University study. The research sheds light on why staunch Democrats and Republicans can hear the same information, but walk away with opposite conclusions.
The investigators used functional neuroimaging (fMRI) to study a sample of committed Democrats and Republicans during the three months prior to the U.S. Presidential election of 2004. The Democrats and Republicans were given a reasoning task in which they had to evaluate threatening information about their own candidate. During the task, the subjects underwent fMRI to see what parts of their brain were active. What the researchers found was striking.
"We did not see any increased activation of the parts of the brain normally engaged during reasoning," says Drew Westen, director of clinical psychology at Emory who led the study. "What we saw instead was a network of emotion circuits lighting up, including circuits hypothesized to be involved in regulating emotion, and circuits known to be involved in resolving conflicts." Westen and his colleagues will present their findings at the Annual Conference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Jan. 28.
Once partisans had come to completely biased conclusions -- essentially finding ways to ignore information that could not be rationally discounted -- not only did circuits that mediate negative emotions like sadness and disgust turn off, but subjects got a blast of activation in circuits involved in reward -- similar to what addicts receive when they get their fix, Westen explains.
"None of the circuits involved in conscious reasoning were particularly engaged," says Westen. "Essentially, it appears as if partisans twirl the cognitive kaleidoscope until they get the conclusions they want, and then they get massively reinforced for it, with the elimination of negative emotional states and activation of positive ones."
"...and the corruption evident at every single level of government, especially when certain pre-approved (by Wall Street) candidates are involved."
This is why the debt-based fiat monetary system has to be completely abolished and replaced with REAL money. EVERYTHING in the form of corruption springs from this diabolical fount.
< Hillary is too big to jail.
< Hillary('s ass) is too big to (fit through the) jail (door).
Nothing more fun than watching an AP "true believer" get just the slightest clue that maybe, just maybe, mind you, the people he thought were up for "the cause" were just lying, cheating bastards all along. You can almost see his brain turn to jello inside his skull.
Not to worry, though, he'll never be invited back. He's broken now.
Let the Anarchist Judge tell you like it is....
(He got fired from Fox news for this video)
https://youtu.be/UgGnBCDfCLM
"We did not see any increased activation of the parts of the brain normally engaged during reasoning,"
Anusocracy:Thanks for that.
I always believed that folks who claim to be a "life long" blah blah blah had lost the ability to think. Now I know they really are NUMB skulls. This explains why so many in top .gov jobs work so hard to lie and deceive the public.
We are so screwed. There is no going back from this.
Corzine will be her Veep candidate...
Come on ZH'ers! Don't be so hard on the 'Everyday Policitians' ... he did say they be charitable organizashuns.
And, more impotently, the Laws dont apply to the Big Peoples.
It's ok, when their computers crash and all the data gone missing ... or somehow they axidently erased all the relevanet data ... or it be my 'oversight' ... or even if they said "the dog ate all the data" ... it's ok, there be no investigation 'cause they be the Big People.
Why would anyone retroactively look into a break-in at, say, the Watergate Hotel or the shooting of JFK or the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.
When it's over, its over.
5 second rule.
Just like there's no need to look into the possibility that explosives were used to bring down the Twin Towers and Building 7 because, clearly, everyone can see that no explosives were used to bring down those buildings, and it would be a waste of time and resources to investigate such a blatant dead-end.
Wow.
I fully endorse Hillary for POTUS 2016
HILLARY’s EMAILGATE: The Height of Hubris and Chutzpah
Hillary, America's Queen.
.....well at least they got that threatening tom brady.....i will get out from under my now, knowing my psi is within the 2 lb allowance...
Nail guns will be flying off the shelves in DC this weekend.
Well this asshole knows that if he lies and has no morals he will get a better job. So he doesn't care about the truth or answering questions he only cares about himself. Fuck you and all of you in Washington DC that have no morals. May you die a miserable death, it the least you deserve.
Somebody has to quote Hitlery on this ...
"What does it matter?"
(she wants a bigger dick than Putin)
Dick, clit, she'd better choose:
http://www.americanresistanceparty.org/2015/may/lesbianaffair.pdf
I'm
Ready for
Oligarchy
"The choice is clear; there isn't one"
Bush Sr. 4 years + Bush Jr. 8 years + Clinton 8 years + Clinton 8 years = 28 years of oligarchy under two political dynasties.
Election is about
(1) Old money buying political power (republicans)
(2) politically powerful trading favors for money (democrats)
You ferget the current POTUS in your list?
Fail,
plus you need ten more items in your list to be anywhere near credible.ald
You cannot endorse her. Because she has already been pre elected as the next US President.
Just like a Black President was ordained to be elected as the next US President right at the time of the second Bush's first win.
Similarly, right after Obama's election, it has been pre ordained on the American (re)public that the next President would be a woman and unless Liz Warren wins, it will be Hillary (from the Clinton dynasty).
Ba da bing, and there you go.
Anyone who truly looks at 9/11 can readily see that these buildings were brought down by controlled demolition (CD). WTC7 is the smoking gun. No plane flew into it. 48 storey steel frame buildings do not collapse into their own footprint in 6.5 seconds (no resistance/ gravity free fall) due to sporadic office fires I.e. burning office chairs, desks, carpet tiles, wall partitions, lightweight doors, paper, lever arch folders, plastic pens etc.
WTC7 could only have been brought down by CD. Meaning that a highly competent team spent several weeks studying the building design, calculating the CD requirements and then installing the explosives, detonators and wires/ comms system.
This means that the attack events of the day were known well in advance of 9/11and were prepared to ensure maximum gain for those working to an agenda.
My opinion is not simply that of a so-called tin-foil hat wearing, bat shit crazy 'conspiracy theorist'. I am a chartered professional civil engineer with 25 years experience.
Why does the Chosenite media treat members of the two major parties so differently if "both parties are the same"?
Ever watch pro-wrestling? Faces and heels.
BoredRoom,
Generals and Globetrotters.
Generals are boring, play a straight game, and are ridiculed. Globetrotters are exciting, break all the rules and are beloved. They practice together, eat the same catered food, fly in the same chartered planes, and split the ticket sales.
To create the illusion of democracy and distract dopey people from the reality that the one snake has two heads... one blue, the other red.
The two heads are on this side of the curtain, the single body is on the other side of the curtain and obscured by smoke and mirrors.
Yup.
It does offer some hard evidence via brainscan that cog dis of conflicting information is simply wished away rather than subject to logical examination.
I made a few lightbulbs go on at a recent family gathering where a casual conversation turned to the election cycle and the candidates.
The wife shot me the warning look (Don't go there) as I returned the 'Who me?' innocent thumb-twiddle (a noted cog dis instigator). While I was fiddling with a quarter on the table, my niece (Hillary girl) asked me what I thought. I flipped the coin and said "Does it really matter?" (No groans. I was disappointed.) and a thought hit me.
Sure it matters both sides assured me, so I explained with the coin.
"One coin with 2 images, both different, one can call opposing sides as in heads or tails. If we look at the coin in a two dimension framework, they are indeed different images. Reality however shows us we live in a 3 dimensional world. What happens if we view the coin in that 3rd dimension?"
With that I spun the coin on edge. "Looking at the coin in it's entirety, the differences become blurred when you reveal it's true 3D nature. Politics are exactly the same. They give you a coin, knowing that you'll set it on one side or the other and never discover it's true dimension."
From there, we were off to the races and I didn't have to hurt my hands hammering on heads.
I'd like everyone in the US facing a legal trial to put forth the same defence - the 'Hillary Defence'
"Your honour, this hearing is a 'Retroactive Review' and any judgement that might be bought against me is therefore a Retroactive one, therefore inadmissable "
What's this 'retroactive' bullshit word w.r.t. judgements?
ALL judgements are on past 'retro' events.
Investigations could hardly assess and pass judgement on future events...
For example it's not like the military of a country e.g. The Department of Attack could legitimately invade foreign countries pre-emptively on the basis of what they judge MIGHT happen... oh wait...
'Retroactive: (especially of legislation) taking effect from a date in the past.'
Is this muppet suggesting that the laws have changed in the U.S. w.r.t. 'democratically' elected holders of public office using their tax-advantaged registered charity to covertly take payments from private interest groups. Is this flunky suggesting that the morals and ethics of any such conflict of interest have been only recently established?
Absolutely stunning. The audacity of these people is simply breath taking.
I guess in "retrospect" Jeffrey Dahmer was simply embraicing the paleo diet.
Thanks for that video
Is asking questions a crime? http://vho.org/Intro/GB/Flyer.html
Maybe. Be careful.
Yup.
Pulitzer's are won that way.
Papers are sold the other way.
Why is Kimmi's ass so grotesque? is an example of a bad question.
No. More than once I've seen that reporter 'call Bullshit.' I think he enjoys the sport of fucking with flacks who're lying right to his face.
Agreed.
I think he does extremely well to maintain his composure and repeat his questions diplomatically. The .gov sock puppet shill was like a deer in headlights; too stunned by legitimate questioning to maintain control of the situation. The worthless fool.
Full credits to the journo.
Credit for his composure.
I would have been "Whoaaah Buddy. What the FUCK did you just say?"
It's probably why I was never tapped for the Diplomatic Corps.
lol.
I think he knew he was playing with fire and likely would never be invited back at best and fired from his job at the worse.
He was stunned.
Journalists ask questions in public theater to ensure that their cars don't have fatal accidents with the Corpus contained there in.
This is not about Hillary this is about your very lives.
That flesh bag of feces was knee deep in the killing of Ambassador Stevens who was going to bring down the entire arms shipments to jihadi snack bars.
Maybe we laudibly find this entertaining but if we let the entire whitehouse make edicts above the law there will be nothing left but the slaughters to come upon the American people by nazis in minority masks
And one last if she has accepted money repeatedly from foreign interests she may well have accepted direct funds from Russian interests the likes of Putiñ and Company.
That is not negligence that is TREASON.
So all you people in the NSA FBI DEA or whatever alphagetti soup agency you work for care about seeing your kids eat or gangs roving your neighborhood you better get a vested interest in getting these above the law whitehouse people held to accouñt for their lawless actions.
Actually, this is big news is Russia. One of the "donations" was from a Russian uranium mining company. The company was owned by a US firm, but the Russians wanted to buy it, however there were some hurdles. So, they paid Hillary's State Department with a "charitable donation" and thus approved the sale of a uranium mine to the Russian company. I'll try and find the link, surprised it never showed up on ZH.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-23/more-clinton-cronyism-selling-u...
Where you been short time?
There it is! Can't stayed glued to the .com, I still have basic job functions to perform!
Putin's money is worse than anyone elses?
Bribery and buying influence has preferable time-zones?
Yes. It is treason.
The AP reporter is controllrd opposition. Or he would not have got his foot in the door, Or they would not have let him ask all those questions. AP itself is a red shield organization
He's likely at Home Depot right now asking about nail guns. 'Which 3" has the greatest driving power'?
Cant fit her for a kankle bracelet for house arrest.
So obviously we should support people like McConnell who are moderates, who labor endlessly for bipartisanship, to serve their people, right?
I DON'T THINK SO.
hook your MRI to that and tell me what you think!
It is the fucking "moderates" yearning for bipartisan programs that have got us where we are today. Watch as we are saved again with this brave new trade deal that promises us even GREATER foreign trade. As with each prior trade deals NAFTA GAAT and more, we have watched our circumstances circling the drain even closer. Every fucking one of them has been the result of bipartisan "moderates".
Partisans my ass.
I get the feeling you still have a nasty streak of free will and critical thinking left in you.
You'll get past that. Or you'll be disappeared. Whatever. Doesn't matter to them. Your choice, so long as you shut up one way or the other.
Hear, hear!
"Bipartisanship" is the Deep States way of compromising BOTH SIDES liberties away. The latest example of this political ruse is the word "gridlock", used by the Deep State (MSM pundits, regulators & pols) to convey some ill-defined crisis building due to governmental inaction.
I submit the absolute opposite is true, it is they who have created every "crisis" by their own actions, bipartisan or otherwise.
The debt & deficit is the result of their actions, domestic spying is the result of their actions, the devaluing of the dollar is the result of their actions...one can go right down the list.
Hehe,
Gridlock tm
The other guy's fault.
This is why a third candidate needs to be introduced, and not just in these kinds of tests or experiments. That candidate needs to be truth and the subjects need to rewire themselves to favor said candidate above all others.
Back when Ross Perot was acting like the third candidate, it really did change the debate. It is needed again
ummmm Dear Dumbass
Ross Perot is what Brought America the Clinterds......some fucking accomplishment, huh?
Ross Perot actually got 18-19% of the population to awake from their induced, hypnotic slumber and shed their sheepskins... Unfortunately, most went back to sleep and grazing out to pasture
Where have you gone H. Ross Perot
Our nation turns it lonely eyes to you....
Boredroom -> The wealth of American ignorance in your post is overwhelming.
Clinton's were brought to us courtesy the Rockefellers.
BoredRm, my point was not about what Ross Perot had to say, though he was better than most who enter the freak show for president.
My point was having three people in the fray, changes the dynamic to something more positive, rather that having two thieves stealing stuff from each of your pockets.
It would, but it's been a long time since the debates weren't fully controlled by the two major political parties. Perot, and John Anderson before him, ran for president when the League of Women Voters sponsored the debates and could better judge third-party/independent "viability".
New research has found that young adult men who watch more violence on television showed indications of less mature brain development and poorer executive functioning.[1] For the investigation, Indiana University School of Medicine used psychological testing and MRI scans to measure mental abilities and volume of brain regions in 65 healthy males with normal IQ who were between the ages of 18 and 29.1 According to lead author Tom A. Hummer, PhD, the young men provided estimates of their television viewing over the past year and then kept a detailed diary of the viewing for a week.1
Executive function is the ability to formulate plans, make decisions, reason and problem-solve, regulate attention, and inhibit behavior to achieve goals.1 The participants also completed a series of psychological tests that measured their inhibitory control, attention, and memory.1 MRI scans were used to measure brain structure.1
“We found that the move violent TV viewing a participant reported, the worse they performed on tasks of attention and cognitive control,” said Hummer. “On the other hand, the overall amount of TV watched was not related to performance on any executive function tests. The worry is that more impulsivity does not mix well with the behaviors modeled in violent programming.”1
Hummer continued, “When we looked at the brain scans of young men with higher violent television exposure, there was less volume of white matter connecting the frontal and parietal lobes, which can be a sign of less maturity in brain development.”1
White matter is tissue in the brain that insulates nerve fibers connecting different brain regions, making executive functioning more efficient.1 In typical development, the amount or volume of white matter increases as the brain continues to make more connections until about age 30, improving communication between brain regions.1 Connections between frontal and parietal lobes are especially important for executive functioning.1
“The take-home message from this study is the finding of a relationship between how much violent television we watch and important aspects of brain functioning like controlled attention and inhibition,” said Hummer. “With this study, we could not isolate whether people with poor executive function are drawn to programs with more violence or if the content of the TV viewing is responsible for affecting the brain’s development over time. Additional longitudinal work is necessary to resolve whether individuals with poor executive function and slower white matter growth are more drawn to violent programming or if exposure to media violence modifies development of cognitive control.”1
[1] Nauert, R. (2014). Exposure to TV Violence Tied to Brain, Cognitive Abnormalities. Psych Central. Retrieved on June 20, 2014, from http://psychcentral.com/news/2014/06/19/exposure-to-tv-violence-tied-to-...
"we could not isolate whether people with poor executive function are drawn to programs with more violence or if the content of the TV viewing is responsible for affecting the brain’s development over time."
In other words, the study is pointless.
Thank God Women's Roller Derby is safe viewing.
Get a fast enough strobe light or high speed camera and see what happens when you watch Tee Vee....
it appears as if partisans twirl the cognitive kaleidoscope until they get the conclusions they want...
Close the propaganda matrix puts forth information in structured form until it gets the solutions it wants by programming this reaction in the first place.
How would it do that?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Consciousness_Project
What does everyone carry on them and doesn't share with anyone else. Why a cell(DNA)phone... It is a 2 way communication device which also has near field communication capabilities (which works of weak magnetic fields through induction through the air).
Your head fires off a lot of magnetic and electrical energy when it is emotionally charged....
There's science, then there's "social science". I think http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-01/euhs-esl012406.php is the latter.
Not science until the hypothesis is challenged and proved to be either right or wrong.
Insurance fraud, and agitation by the usual suspects...the attorneys. The victors of the "Revolutionary War:" Attorneys and Bankers. Rinse and repeat for every other conflict.
Creators and connoisseurs of the Broken Window Theorem, on a Micro to Macro scale (what are wars, after all, than millions of broken windows...and insurance claims paid to the Owners of the cannon fodder?)
Oh. That's right. Hitlery is an attorney. What a shock.
Sharks and Lawyers tend not to prey on their own unless everything else is dead already.
"Presidents in the US are selected, NOT elected."
If it were that simple, a peanut farmer from gerorgia would never have been persident, nor would a community organizer from Chicago.
Nor are Bush and Clinton shoo in's for the nominations next year.
http://pdf.amazingdiscoveries.org/References/RtR/Lec4/Lec4-List_of_US_Pr...
Makes it much easier to see and recognize.
They are all related to each other and almost all of them are descendants of English Kings. Remember the US was an English colony prior.
Carter is sixth cousins with Richard Nixon and both Nixon and Carter are ninth cousins to Warren Harding.
Warren Harding is a direct descendant of King Ethelred II and Nixon is a direct descendant of King Edward I.
And what is more interesting all the English Kings the US Presidents are descendants of, all those Kings are direct descendants of King Alfred the Great.
Obama through his maternal grandfather.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Armour_Dunham
Stanley Armour Dunham’s distant cousins include six U.S. presidents: James Madison, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush.[21] Through a common ancestor, Mareen Duvall, a wealthy Huguenot merchant who emigrated to Maryland in the 1650s, Stanley Dunham is related to former Vice-President Dick Cheney (an eighth cousin once removed).[6] Through another common ancestor, Hans Gutknecht, a Swiss German from Bischwiller, Alsace whose three sons resettled in Germantown, Pennsylvania as well as the Kentucky frontier in the mid-18th century, Stanley Dunham is President Harry S. Truman's fourth cousin, twice removed.[22][23][24] Stanley Dunham and Wild Bill Hickock are sixth cousins, four times removed, through Jacob Dunham.[25]
...
Through that relationship makes Obama related to Carter and also a descendant of King Edward I and William the Lion of Scotland. His pedigree is even more royal than the Bushs' who are only descendants of King Edward I (and also related to Obama).
Bill (assuming he really isn't a Rockefeller bastard) and Hillary are not part of the royalty bloodline club. She isn't eligible to be selected as winner on the American President Idol show and when a few slip through like Kennedy or Reagan they make sure the Vice Presidents are and assassinate them afterwards. The game is rigged one way or the other.
Eisenhower was an exception with that WWII thing and being a major general and national war hero afterwards who saved these guys asses and control system. He was still paired with Nixon who was and then it was made okay through marriage later one aka Dwight's grandson being married off to Nixon's daughter. That marriage thing is important as you will see why.
The next one before him was Woodrow Wilson who also wasn't in the club. Wilson was married to Thomas Jefferson's great great great niece who was part of the royalty club. Thomas Jefferson is a direct descendant of King Henry I of England.
We all know what transpired under Wilson, IRS, Federal Reserve, etc.
The next one before Wilson was William McKinley who wasn't in the royalty club. Assassinated and succeeded by Teddy Roosevelt (vice president) who was. Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt (both related) are descendants of King Edward III.
Clinton is the only anomaly here (unless he was cleared by DNA on intern's dress...) and they botched killing Reagan.
Al Gore isn't part of the club and neither is Lieberman, we all know what transpired there during the 2000 election. It had nothing to do with Democrat or Republican when it comes to American Idol President edition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States
They are all blood related from the last century after Wilson (married into the club) and the exceptions I've already spelled out. It is a controlled office for blood related English royalty and has been since day one with Washington.
You are right TD. Because this pisses me off so much I could not even watch the whole clip. Fuck the sycophant but also fuck the reporter. I realize he has to get a paycheck and feed his family but he was apologetic in the face of pure idiocy. He knew where the camera was, did you notice how he kept, nervously, trying not to look at the camera. How do you not challenge this retard and call him out for the lying sack of manure that he is. You could do it in a strong non apologetic way and not sound like a labia majora. But I guess this is the best we can get in the land of the free and the home of the brave. Fuck them or fuck me I am not sure which it will be at this point.
Bleed acid.
This spokesman is such a fucking weasel.....it's both criminal and embarrasing.
Perhaps.
But the other obvious conclusion is that Obama plans to follow the Clintons' example and enrich himself in exactly the same way when he leaves office. How else is he going to cash in?
Why would he humiliate all of his potential sponsors at this late date just to get back at Hillary? Also, she knows stuff he would not want broadly exposed. So it's a conspiracy of silence.
ZHers will see Obama in places even more sketch than Kazakhstan before too long.
Certainly her bottom is.
Hillary, and Jon Corzine.
"The most transparent administration ever." Behind a mirrored bulletproof glass window with: a foot of lead, concrete, steel plate, Kevlar, and a 10 foot wall of mud encased in titanium.
When do the hangings start?
So really what Jeff Rathke is saying here is.... "At this point, what difference does it make?"
The stonewalling and lying again and again with a detached calm cool collected voice makes me angry.
Two hundred pounders go to jail too, you know.
All politicians need to be held accountable for their actions by a 'public' justic system (not congressional based). If this doesn't happen, I fear that the tension building up in the system is going to pop wide open....and the guillotines will be rolling.
American's need their laws enforced.
Too big to jail? Just make a bigger jail
Junction...No she's not.
Not true. I've seen women in prison with bigger asses
Not many, but there's a few
Someone send me this pic http://d1w116sruyx1mf.cloudfront.net/ee-assets/gsd/funnies/Hitler-Hillar... interesting isn't it?
One, and the same.
Some people didn't want to get Vince-Fostered.
Deep State, BitChez!
So if I committed a crime in the past I'm okay? The government does not "do" retroactive judgment? Cool. Good to know.
Did you think about/plot it in the future? Because it seems, to Big Brother, that if you thought about it, ever, you are guilty.
Every time I think about a commiting a one billion dollar crime in the future, I also think about a one million dollar donation to one of the Teams in the future. It's worked so far.
So, the Legal Presumption for Probable Cause is now being used on a pure discretionary (at will) basis?
IOW... Probable Cause applies only to Sheeple, not the rich or powerful.
Like I keep saying: Neo Feudalism. 2.0. New & Improved.
When the law is enforced with discretion, those who enforce the law should not expect discretion from the population.
The Deep State says judges are over worked, haggard, case loads unbearable. So a directive from on high to the prosecutors was given, to use a little more discretion in bringing people before these poor distraught judges.
And thus the system was saved, not the Rule of Law mind you, the system ;-)
I'm okay your okay.
Our government is a joke, a bad one.
Not "our" government. Not a "joke."
It is Zion's government. A criminal and treasonous tyranny of one.
Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission.
"Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission."
It is really all PR, just like the comment, "they hate us for our freedoms."
The Constitution created a legislature. States created legislatures. Whatever the first law passed, was tyranny. It placed a limit on something.
Some of the sons of liberty owned slaves. Women were not allowed to vote.
Most people work for someone else. Someone else is in charge.
Even the President can't do just anything he wants. Even if he does have a phone and a pen.
The big picture is clear now but wasn't before. Better late than never.
:-)
While I respect you, your attitude is indicative of the problem:
"Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission" is not PR, but a reminder. A reminder that like all things great and good, Liberty must live in you, if it is to live at all.
Liberty is a condition and an expectation. Liberty is the condition of living how you see fit, and being left alone, and affording others the same. Liberty is demanding that others respect your Liberty. If Liberty lives with and in you, then you must demand it, or submit to whatever tyranny others may have in store for you.
Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission.
Liberty was seen at the Bundy Ranch. Liberty was seen at Waco. Liberty has also been spotted in Ferguson, MO, and Baltimore, MD.
Some of the sons of liberty owned slaves. Women were not allowed to vote...
What they put in place however, was / is a living document that has allowed for future growth in order to promote even greater freedoms as witnessed in subsequent amendments. I may not totally agree with all the subsequent rulings and interpretations given to these acts, but these changes were still designed to be applied and accepted without the need for anarchy to precede their implementation.
I agree with you though, a man's got to know his limitations... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VrFV5r8cs0
They aren't my government. Must be the "Royal Our."
Zi'Borg government, using Zi'Borg Economics & Politics.
Fuck Bills Mother
Fuck his drunken stepfather
Fuck his stepbrother
Fuck Littlerock
Fuck Bill
Fuck Hillary
Fuck chelsea
Fuck the sight of both or all of them...a paux on their respective houses.
Hey now! Little Rock is OK...
...now that we got the Clintons out of there.
You forgot Webb Hubbell
And fuck their couch!
(which they probably stole from the White House)
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/06/us/clintons-will-return-any-gifts-foun...
It's all Hillary. Without her Bill would never have made it out of Arkansas. He might even have done time for his own petty crimes and scams.
Hillary rode Bill's coattails to the power she could not have obtained on her own. At this stage he's just an embarrassment who's outlived his usefulness, and if she could whack Bill and marry Huma, her real soulmate, without raising suspicion, I don't doubt she'd have done it long ago.
We just don't want to prosecute our own member (the Clintons).
Yes, we allow crime and corruption in America.
Yes, if we allow the Clintons to escape this, it means there is more (not just the Clintons).
The people should not let this sick corruption stand. The complicit media is the most guilty and should be forced to cross protest lines and flying shit everyday just to get to work.
Indeed. Somebody should do something.......
Help!!! (am I doin it right?)
Hard to believe how brazen the corruption is nowadays.
Matt Lee, Man of The Year after Putin.
Fuck ALL Bush and Clintons.
There used to be a time when our Government Officials would hide their Lawlessness. Now they just do it out in the open and when you call them on it - they basically just say Fuck You Peon!
I hope that Edward Snowden has an extra bedroom in his apartment. Mr. Lee may need it because challengers of the Clintons have been known to "off" themselves.
"the most transparent..."
I miss the tug-job you used to get when they parted your cheeks.
Now? Nothing.
Unadulterated BULLSHIT! How bout the Justice (Not) Department looking into this legaleaze mumbo jumbo to see if foul play was involved during her tenure as SOS. INFLUENCE money for the rich now and has forever gotten the green light? WTF???? Why aren't this reporter's questions being answered? Is this the rhetoric we have to put up with from now on. If she is dirty in any way, we're going to vote her in for President?
WHERE IS THE LAW?
It's all in your mind.
"Justice being taken away, then, what are kingdoms but great robberies? For what are robberies themselves, but little kingdoms? The band itself is made up of men; it is ruled by the authority of a prince, it is knit together by the pact of the confederacy; the booty is divided by the law agreed on. If, by the admittance of abandoned men, this evil increases to such a degree that it holds places, fixes abodes, takes possession of cities, and subdues peoples, it assumes the more plainly the name of a kingdom, because the reality is now manifestly conferred on it, not by the removal of covetousness, but by the addition of impunity. Indeed, that was an apt and true reply which was given to Alexander the Great by a pirate who had been seized. For when that king had asked the man what he meant by keeping hostile possession of the sea, he answered with bold pride, “What thou meanest by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, whilst thou who dost it with a great fleet art styled emperor.” -- St. Augustine (354-430), in Book IV of The City of God
Liberty is a demand. Tyrnany is submission.
Thank you kc. Excellent, poignant quote. I need to read a little wider.
My, my. St. Augustine. Most impressive.
Maybe you can move beyond the silly slogans training wheels.
"Because I said so Matt Lee, and sorry to hear about your not so distant future suicide....." -Jeff Rathke-
Please tell me this rathke isn't from the tribe.
The Entitlement of the sycophants is danger #1, and the most pathetic to boot.
You guys are still missing the main vein of Billary Rodkunt Klinton. When Bill became Prez., he had his cronies waltz into the FBI office and get the Classified FBI files of a shitload of high ranking Govt. douchesycles, many who are still obviously employed. Piss off Billary and they throw the Top Secret FBI dirt to to the presses and your fucking toast. Genius, in my book...
SOP for banana republic dictatorial types.
If I could have overidden my absolute revulsion of "a law" requiring someone to buy a product or service (whether one used it or had need of it or not) I could be dictator of my own little island right now.
Everything has its consequence, even morality & ethics. But would I have been happy & content?
No ;-)
Many people believe House Of Cards is based on the Clintons, myself included.
Because they already gave her a STERN warning?
Completely outrageous. Kudos again to ZH for publishing this. Not something I even heard about. I loved when the second reporter asked the same question. Brilliant.
Hillary is going to have a long year and half in front of her. Plenty more cockroaches to come out over that timeframe.
Dude, she's gonna ride her magic carpet all the way to the White House. This is the new Murica where the more sleezy and corrupt you are, the more the electorate thinks you're cool and badass and will gladly cast their vote for you.
Our Republic is truly dead, so enjoy the rest of your life because there's nothing we can do about it.
They didn't even try to pretend anymore. Americans are dirt to corrupt government
And, they'll even lecture us about how corrupt other nations, such as Russia are, for fucks sake.
Exactly what I was thinking.
So negative...
The dirt is the fundiment in which corruption takes root.
I'd like to think that the citizenry is the fertilizer that allows it to grow and bloom.
Nobody likes Round-Up anymore.
The cunt killed an ambassador, ffs. To her, taking bribes is as consequential as douching.
This reporter is going to meet a very gruesome fate.
https://youtu.be/JkEalAeIdkQI doubt those journalists are still alive
Clinton role model Ethyl Rosenburg was ASSistant Secretary of State, and she was executed for treason.
You're up, bitch.
Wha???
Better check your facts.
I can understand why Hillary's britches won't be investigated. No one wants to look in there. Word on the Hill it's stinky & unsightly.
It is quickly becoming obvious to even the brain-dead masses that the US government is nothing more than a bad joke.
The inbred government corruptoids think they are so clever and so important. But really, they are just a bad joke.
How could anyone possibly take them serious ever again?
Not really a joke. This is a deadly serious matter.
This actually makes sense as we have not yet developed the technology necessary to prosecute, let alone investigate, past crimes, a.k.a "apply retroactive judgment."
WHAT IN THE FUCK. And only one reporter asking, and apologetically at that. for fucks sake........