This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
North Korean Defense Minister Executed With Anti-Aircraft Gun For Napping
There was some confusion what caused the fallout between North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and his defense minister, Hyon Yong Chol. According to Reuters Chol was charged with treason, including disobeying Kim. According to Bloomberg, his offense was more trivial: he fell asleep. The defense minister "was captured napping in video footage of the event late last month."
As a point of reference, the North Korean defense minister is one of the most influential positions in the country, along with the chief of general staff and the head of the military’s political bureau. Hyon had been in the role since June last year.
Whichever one is true is irrelevant, but one thing is certain: nobody will ever be caught napping at official events ever again because while the catalyst that set Jong Un off may be unclear, Chol's fate is now know: he was executed in front of an anti-aircraft gun at a firing range, according to Seoul's National Intelligence Service, the latest in a series of high-level purges since Kim Jong Un took charge.
Reuters adds that his execution was watched by hundreds of people, according to NIS intelligence shared with lawmakers.
It was not clear how the NIS obtained the information and it is not possible to independently verify such reports from within secretive North Korea.
"The NIS official said it had been confirmed by multiple sources. It is still just intelligence, but he said they were confident," Shin Kyoung-min, a lawmaker and member of the opposition New Politics Alliance for Democracy, who attended the briefing, told Reuters.
Experts on North Korea said there was no sign of instability in Pyongyang, but there could be if purges continued.
Chol is just the latest casualty in a rising total of "purges" ordered by the young North Korean dictator as he feels his control on power may be slipping: "Kim had previously ordered the execution of 15 senior officials this year as punishment for challenging his authority, according to the NIS. In all, some 70 officials have been executed since Kim took over after his father's death in 2011, Yonhap news agency cited the NIS as saying."
The list of those purged his uncle and one-time deputy, Jang Song Thaek. In January, he executed General Pyon In Son, head of operations in the army, for disagreeing with him. He also executed about 50 officials last year on charges ranging from graft to watching South Korean soap operas.
It is unclear whether a purge of Kim himself could follow, and whether he would be replaced with an even more hard core leader.
"There is no clear or present danger to Kim Jong Un's leadership or regime stability, but if this continues to happen into next year, then we should seriously start to think about revising our scenarios on North Korea," said Michael Madden, an expert on the country's leadership who contributes to the 38 North think tank in Washington.
Koh Yu-hwan, a North Korea specialist at Dongguk University in Seoul, said the regime could "reach its limit" if Kim's purges continued. "But it's still too early to tell," said Koh.
Bloomberg cites Oh Gyeong Seob, a North Korea researcher at the Sejong Institute near Seoul, who adds that “The purge shows the extreme steps he has to take to have a complete grip on power,” said by phone. “This may hurt the stability of his regime down the line” because the top brass in North Korea may feel threatened by Kim’s brutality, Oh said.
But back to Hyon, and his capital offense: terminal napping.
Hyon was said to have shown disrespect to Kim by dozing off at a military event, the Seoul lawmakers said, citing the agency briefing. Hyon was also believed to have voiced complaints against Kim and had not followed his orders several times, according to the lawmakers.
He was arrested in late April and executed three days later without legal proceedings, the NIS told lawmakers.
All things considered, it could have been worse: Hyon could have merely had a visit from a lethal drone operated out of Nevada, and disappeared in an unsourced explosion, with the same effect.
At least North Korea has the courage to own up to its political executions.

- 60207 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -




Holy shit that place sucks. Thank God I wasn't born there.
amen. and im an athiest.
He needed to get off those sleeping meds.
I'm long coffee futures!
Oh, rarrry! You don't sray.
https://teamfisticuffs.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/kim_jong_il.jpg?w=640
Bammy's purged a whole buncha high level officers, too.
Not for napping, but apparently for swearing an oath of allegiance to the Constitution, which they took seriously.
OK OK, so it was like Mooch looking at Bam's doing that selfie thing with the blonde at the funeral
I get a kick out of military officers taking an oath of allegiance to the constitution.
Anyone outside the Navy violates that oath simply by joining.
pods
What..., no hungry wolves...?
Did they at least make him hold his arms out and run around while making jet engine noises?
So the North Korean Dynasty is basically being run just like any Western management-bonus driven company: "the beatings will continue until morale improves."
Isn't that just a bigger nail gun?
It seems gruesome, but I honestly doubt he felt a thing. Past a certain speed, bullets impart hydrostatic shock, like water hammer in an old house; this pressure wave can send a spike to the brain faster than the nerve signals.
It must be true if the NIS says it is so, backed up by Reuters and Bloomberg.
when anti-aircraft guns are outlawed, only outlaws will carry anti-aircraft guns
ps. wear sunglasses when you sit behind the omnicrat and you need to nap
Q: What do you tell a N Korean General who's been who's been hit by a couple rounds fire from an anti-aircraft gun?
A: Nothing. You already told him twice.
Story is meaningless without video.
"WITH?"
or
"NEXT TO?"
Details matter in this case.
If with...boy, talk about overkill.
?? eh? could please someone explain? (besides, what about the Marine Corps?)
Article I Section 8 (dealing with Legislative powers):
The founders were very leery of having a standing army (we didn't get dressed up for nothing). They allowed the government to RAISE an army (if the militia was not enough) but did not want a standing army.
They did provide for raising and maintaining a Navy. (properly so)
In my opinion, an amendment should have been passed to allow for maintaining an Air Force as well as a Navy. But the Army and Marine Corps are unconstitutional.
pods
Ahh, the but Marines were to be delivered by the Navy to take care of those on the shores of Tripoli. For some enforcement, you will always need boots on the ground, and the men who will fill those boots.
Well, in warfare terms I agree. But the Navy was founded to maintain safety on the seas for trade vessels of the nation.
pods
This is no different to what the US does all the time - shredding people with anti-tank canon shells fired from Apache helicopters. One example, the video leaked by Bradley Manning
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rXPrfnU3G0
Why is this stuff being published now? To distract from something the US military has done?
pods...
Read below.
Take care of whom on the shores of Tripoli?
The Barbary Pirates? We had no trade with Tripoli. There were no Americans on the ground.
Your view of history reads as if Sarah Palin wrote it.
We attacked Tripoli as a result of our Merchant Ships being raided by pirates in that Old World Sea....the Mediteranian Sea...you know?
We were not trading with Tripoli...at all.
We were there to destroy the pirates, their ships, and their Capitol. The Barbary Coast is Northern Africa. We attacked their headquarters, just as the British attacked, sacked, and burned Washington DC to the ground some ten years later during the War of 1812.
Only EIGHT Marines took part in the raid. Of course the USA did not have any problem hiring 500 Mercenaries to compliment those EIGHT Marines. And...they did not make it to Tripoli. (I guess the song is accurate in that case...shores of Tripoli...)
Booyah.
Propaganda. Same as it ever was.
As for the Marines? They were a branch of the US Navy. The new Frigates, each one, were given an allotment of Marines as "armament".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Marine_Corps
The United States Marine Corps traces its institutional roots to the Continental Marines of the American Revolutionary War, formed by Captain Samuel Nicholas by a resolution of the Second Continental Congress on 10 November 1775, to raise 2 battalions of Marines. That date is regarded and celebrated as the date of the Marine Corps' birthday. At the end of the American Revolution, both the Continental Navy and Continental Marines were disbanded in April 1783. The institution itself would not be resurrected until 11 July 1798. At that time, in preparation for the Quasi-War with France, Congress created the United States Marine Corps.[34] Marines had been enlisted by the War Department as early as August 1797[35] for service in the new-build frigates authorized by the Congressional "Act to provide a Naval Armament" of 18 March 1794,[36] which specified the numbers of Marines to be recruited for each frigate.
Well, the Marines are technically a branch of the Navy.....which is blasphemy to the average devil dog, but alas I believe it is so. The Army, Coast Guard, and Air Force are unconstitutional, although I do concur that some form of military air defense became a necessity with the advent of aerial warfare.
And I don't say that just because I served in the USAF, either. Oh shit wait.....doesn't that make me a potential domestic lone-wolf tear-a-wrist?
Nah,
Just a part of the Army Air Corps...
Umm... The United States Marine Corps is a component of the Department of the Navy..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Marine_Corps
You are not incorrect. But what if the Navy also adopted the Army, would that make it constitutional?
The Marine Corps are an army that is delivered by the Navy.
That is the problem with ambiguity. The authority granted the general government by the constitution was pretty clear.
If the water gets muddled, you pass an amendment BEFORE you enter into the action.
pods
Silly pods .... Laws are for little people!
pods, I have to admit that I'm more at home with the constitutions of a dozen european countries. but when I read:
""To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy;" "
I read that it's allowed to raise Armies. while it's not allowed to fund them for longer then two years. hence... a yearly funding through a yearly budget... would be constitutional
what did I miss?
Why on earth are you folks even discussing what is 'constitutional' or not? It's been a looong time since the constitution has meant anything. (if it really ever even has for the common folk).
:/
I see your point. But it is kind of like being a kid looking up at the stars. Contemplating things.
We can see what some of them wanted, the struggles between factions, and the results.
It may help to rebuild once that time comes.
pods
You have to keep in mind, that was written when police and army were one in the same. Today, they're not. IMO, in a civil war, the current military would be just as divided as the populace, perhaps even more so. While I agree, standing armies are something to be leery of, we have a police force that could be considered a paramilitary force. That in itself, is something that I don't think jives with the constitution.
I think it gets difficult nowadays due to the corporate nature of government.
Makes for difficult arguments as under corporate contract, pistol permits are "constitutional" but are a clear infringement on the 2nd amendment as written.
So is a pistol permit an infringement? I guess that depends.
I think that if everyone agreed out in the open about what form of government we actually are functioning under it would clear up a lot of stuff. Might start a revolt, but at least the rules would be clear.
As for police, they can certainly be looked at as mini-armies commanded by the local executive. At least all non-sheriffs.
pods
Good luck on that agreement. Too many people are happy so long as they get the "Welcome to Costco, we love you" treatment when they go shopping.
As for the police, I got pulled over by a sheriff's deputy last night because apparently trying to figure out where you need to turn after midnight is suspicious. I really had to nail him down to get him to say "failure to use a turn signal," which I would have to see the dash cam footage to really know if I did or did not use it. He was on a fishing expedition, because they sure as hell don't enforce turn signal violations here.
Only next time, have the BOR apply to The Public, not "The People."
It doesn't matter. Rights are individual in nature if you want them to be worth anything, yet there will be those who claim otherwise. As long as there is a government, somebody will will be looking for a way to usurp power, no matter how honorable the intent was when that government was initially set up. It may take 10 years, or it make 200, but somebody is going to start doing an end run around the rules under which government was set up, unless they just take power outright. Government is an evil, yet we are going to get a government, whether we want it or not.
What the permission was for was that in case of invasion/insurrection an army could be raised. Also why they were granted the power to declare war.
The appropriations clause was meant to discourage a professional army being open ended by limiting funds to 2 years.
Hamilton wrote of this in Federalist 26.
There was a lot of back and forth in regards to having a professional army (of varying size) in both the Federalist papers and the Anti-Federalist papers.
Here is basically why the appropriations for an army were limited to 2 years, as illustrated by Hamilton:
It was a debate that had merit, and actually came true. We have an open ended military, commanded by the Executive (DoD).
Certainly there can be an argument made that this provision provided for an army. I tend to hyperbolize because most all that was written in the Federalist Papers (concerning the dangers of our government) have come to pass.
But when was the last time there was ANY debate in the Legislature on THE ARMY. Not how much they get this year, but the very existence of it?
Not in my lifetime. Now with a professional Army all of the dangers that were written in the past have come to pass.
Search around more of the Federalist papers if you would like, you are kind of a nuts and bolts guy/gal. Lost of interesting stuff. Most ironic are the ones penned by Hamilton. As he was a big promoter of Federalism, but a lot of articles were on the dangers of Federalism.
pods
Thanks Pods, logged in to up arrow that.
"... a yearly funding through a yearly budget... would be constitutional"
We have not had a budget since Obama took office.
The Federal Government just spends whatever the hell it wants, creates a deficit and then has the Federal Reserve counterfeit US Dollars to "pay" for it.
They could have forseen the need for an air force. The Montgolfiers first balloon flight happened in 1783, the US Constitution was enacted in 1787.
The Marines are technically a department of the Navy. Bascially the Navy is their taxi driver.
could please someone explain?...
I think it has something to do with the quartering of troops during peace time. By having a "War" on terrorism, the US can theoretically have a standing army and still technically be in compliance. It's a stretch but I believe that's the rationale.
The Navy is authorized for peacetime and since the Marines are actually a rapid deployment fighting branch under the Navy, their perpetual existence is seen as acceptable.
Things have become much more murkey since 9/11 with CIA / FBI / NSA / etc., etc... overlapping jurisdictions and historical bounderies, (domestic / foriegn), for the most part obliterated. It seems to be a survival of the fittest struggle with a lot of our nations wealth squandered on bitter in fighting between legislative / judicial and executive branch posturing.
Pathetic, imho.
Quartering of troops was only necessary because there were no permanent military bases in every town back then. The Continental Army quartering its troops wasn't the big issue - the colonists objected to years of British troops demanding quarter (rooms and food) from the locals when they showed up. That was common practice at the time. British soldiers in the colonies didn't travel around with tents and field kitchens, and didn't stay in hotels. If they were dispatched to a city for a few days, the first thing they would do is quarter the troops and horses and commandeer a public house for a headquarters. If they were out in the countryside, they would pretty much just take over your farm for a few days.
It's mostly a relic of the past. The objection wasn't to quartering as much as it was to an Army showing up and demanding quarter from unwilling citizens under federal authority. The colonists felt pretty strongly about the federal government bullying around the people for *any* reason. Today, the Army is set up to (and expected to) provide food and shelter for its soldiers wherever it goes. Quartering troops in occupied homes today would be most unusual.
People sometimes split legal hairs about today's permanent military bases, 'military occupation' and quartering, but that had nothing to do with the original intent of this law, which was directed specifically at military commanders demanding that private homes or farms be forced to take in a few soldiers and horses at their convenience.
It's mostly a relic of the past...
I get your explanation as far as the "quartering of troops" being understood differently "in the past", but as far as your "split(ting) legal hairs" regarding the locating of various members of Armed Soldiers among the populace, the jury, so to speak is still out, imo.
It would seem your current position would lie in the camp of either Executive or Legislative authority to impose their will over that of soveriegn citizens as "legal hairs" are typically those issues of which the judicial branch would sway. Unfortunately history only provides a somewhat decent backdrop concerning these issues after the fact, therefore we may only see the folly of our current position when our grandkids find themselves living under the whims of a goofy despot a la NK or SA.
jmo.
No, my position would lie with the intention and spirit of the founding fathers: the U.S. federal government is the citizens' bitch - by design - not the other way around.
My point was that out of ALL the articles of the constitution, the amendments and the discussion of the issues at the time, e.g., the Federalist Papers, - out of ALL that profound thought - it's stupid, weak and ineffectual to pin some kind of argument against ultimate federal authority or standing armies on THIS ONE ITEM OF QUARTERING in the constitution. If you can't use the reams of other more direct and decisive thought on the origins and extent of federal authority and the role of the military, then you've already lost the argument. There's plenty of more direct thought on the issue - slicing and dicing 'quartering' doesn't get you there. It's unnecessary to do so and distracting. It's appropriate to treat it exactly as it is: a historical example of a specific action that violates the spirit of the constitution.
Prohibition of quartering was a tiny slice of what the founding fathers were fighting against. Whether or not that would have ever been mentioned, it does not materially affect what the constitution framers were TRYING to do: define inalienable personal rights as such, not something 'granted' to the people; define the federal government as existing for certain very limited and well-defined clerical functions of state and never for the purpose of 'ruling'; and finally, building every safeguard they could think of so the apparatus of the federal government would not be corrupted by any power-seeking psychopaths.
Inherent in ALL of that thought is the idea that the federal government and all of its branches have no role in 'ruling' anyone. As such, they do not need their own internal police or a standing military to enforce their rules on citizens at gunpoint, and they don't and never will have the authority to make arrogant demands of the populace under federal authority, SUCH AS demanding quarter for their troops.
what the constitution framers were TRYING to do: define inalienable personal rights...
I agree and submit. My comment has the Jade Helm exercise as a point of reference, but you are correct, there is a much larger issue at stake here. Federal goals should continue to be subservient to the sovereignty of the individual in these United States.
I guess by mentioning the "quartering" issue I was trying to present an historical context to the formation of the rule of "The Sword" as a legitimate function of Government.
The framers were trying to construct a triune organism, (not totally unlike the Trinity of the Godhead then understood and espoused by these framers), into this new and previously unknown Rule of Law.
Frankly, I believe they were incredibly adept, articulate and successful in their initial solution.
Furthermore, as evidence by the subsequent actions taken by their descendants and consequent individuals added to our population through legal and agreed upon methods of acceptance to our nation, modifications and dare I say “improvements” to the Contract / Constitution providing the basis of continued freedom to pursue an avenue to use our 70 to 80 orbits before our “Rest with our Fathers” are becoming increasingly cumbersome, irrelevant, onerous, counterproductive and in need of absolute repudiation by clear thinking and responsible people.
Jmo.
I've read that Obama purged Zionist nuts and nuclear traitors from the officer ranks.
Is that true? Please help my understanding of this.
Well, that's what was reported on MSNBC so it must be true. But all the guys purged were also proven homophobic, intolerant racists which might have had something to do with it as well.
It was actually the opposite of that, farflungstar. Obama doesn't have that kind of control over the military - or at least wouldn't exercise it so openly. The DoD brass does it's own purging for its own political reasons. In case you hadn't heard, the current DoD commanders hate Obama even though their policy seems to parallel that of the administration. Obama hates them in return. He would much rather have the NSA, CIA and drones (which he can lord over) rather than the current Ziopathic and defiant military.
The Zionist nuts were NOT purged - just the opposite. Israeli-firster neocons cemented their take-over of the military once and for all. Any commanders that seemed more loyal to the U.S. and the Constitution than Israel's defense were purged. Nuclear force commanders that would not obey a command to start a nuclear war on Israel's behalf or would not retaliate with nuclear weapons if Israel was attacked were sacked. All this hearsay, of course. None of the Ziopaths would have the balls to put their treasonous criminal acts of purging on the record anywhere.
Interesting that Jewish commanders were also purged. The DoD top brass is heavily-stacked with Jews well out of proportion to the military or civilian population. And just like in the U.S. civilian population, there are a good portion that detest the actions of Israel and flat-out oppose any automatic support for their war crimes. Those commanders were pushed out just like the others. There is a large block of fundamentalist christian zionist Israeli-firsters in the DoD and plenty of Mormon commanders that are die-hard zionists - I would argue perhaps more of them today then die-hard Jewish Zionists in the Pentagon.
The recent purges had their political spin (like everything that goes on in the Pentagon). What nobody can say is that the main reason for the purge was to get rid of anyone not in the Zio-love-club. It arguably DID have that effect, but it could have also been coincidental to the general neocon psychopaths scrambling to maintain their relevance and control. At any rate, the U.S. military has lost quite a few commanders dedicated to defending the U.S. Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. We're left with Zionist chicken-hawks that consider themselves above the law and are more interested in their next job in the defense industry rather than worrying about the plight of the peon masses or their bothersome constitution.
Can we get some banksters to doze off?
Can we get Kim Jong-un for SEC Director?
While execution via a big-assed gun would be apropo for a somnolent general, a more proper exectution method for banksters would be to force feed them Benjamins until they pop, or choke.
As an aside, I sit here wondering whether it was Kim himself, smoking a cigarette no doubt, who sat in the chair of that AA-gun and blew his general to bits. Perversion knows no limits.
They don't have coffee in NoK.
Why? In North Korea Meth is totally legal. You should be long Meth.
He's Asian though, how could they tell?
there are thrill-seekers out there who would pay big money to get executed with an anti-aircraft gun.
Yes, it sounds like a suicide. Suicide by dictator.
zzzzzzzzzzzz... wha...? "Jus' shoot me, yo!"
Removed for bad taste
Here's a substitute for you. From the movie "The Jackal"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyXdB_AYiDs
Spawl.
The nest North Korean billion idea: Exclusive rights to sell NO DOZ!
I only skimmed this article but looking at the comments and knowing what we know of western govs and lying about everything and spreading fear porn and propaganda..why do some zhers take this story created by South Korea as fact?
Video or it didnt happen.
beause it is fun to muse.
"Video or it didnt happen."
False videos can be made of anything you want nowdays.
Maybe: "Send FOX news his head in a jar with formaldehyde"
Quick - but messy ....
Do you think it is better to get poised in a USA jail. Or electrocuted.
Great story for diverting attention away from drone wars for empire, etc..
Not saying it's intentional, but it sure the hell is convenient.
Everything in the media aka 'news' is nothing more than time sensitive propaganda. The themes are long term but you need immediate short term interest stories to program the long term themes over and over and over and over.
Pay attention to the flow of news aka the underlying themes being put forth. They are spaced in a certain repeatable manner also. You can literally time your watch to it.
It is all about controlling the emotional content of the propaganda using whatever short term interest stories best serve that interest. The emotional programming is repeatable day to day, month to month, year to year. It follows very specific cycles and pulses between love+ and hate- also. Decipher the cycle you can time your watch to it including when it is + or - side they are trying to evoke in you.
News is written by pattern matching neural net AI's these days. It is all algorithmic based therefore easily recognizable because machines can not mimic human randomness. People have just been very quietly trained to not have noticed the change. Go read some old newspapers pre 1970, then 70s then 80s, then 90s etc you'll see the progression firsthand.
News is selected for publication. Who selected this and why?
It also has other long term effects on how people learn language and speak/write it. They start to unconsciously assimilate the way they learn and understand language into the propaganda matrix lingo which in turn makes it easier to control you.
Go from there. Who controls the AI's or more importantly the algorithms. They all source from the same networks, especially the financial news and institutions like the FED to keep all the lies in line. The financial news is synced with the stock market trading algos....
Reverse engineer Bloomberg News...
The more 'systematically important' they are the less roads traveled will be needed to lead you right back to Rome.
Here is one theme it programs over and over you ever notice almost every commercial they always make sure to visually highlight a wedding ring on the ring finger, even in porn these days the women all wear rings. It is telling you that you are married to the matrix and reminding you every chance it can get.
To go a little further in how algo's think and chain words and ideas together to program people.
What else rings? A phone. Every notice no one ever shares their cellular phones with anyone else, like they are married to them. Then you have cellular (DNA), DNA is keyed to the individual just like a cellphone is keyed to an individual.
You've already been assimilated and don't even know it....
Whose terminals does the FED use? Work from there as far as financial news flow goes.
If you believe these nonsense stories about North Korea then you need to go back and watch Wag the Dog (1997) starring Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro.
For those who want an even better understanding, see MaxRatt:
http://maxratt.com/blog/2013/04/the-max-ratt-deconstruction-zone-5-april...
I don't know, what's so hard to believe? Wag the Dog doesn't exclude batshit-crazy Lil Kim. He's totally bellievable.
USSA needs fools like Lil Kim to make themselves look moderate by comparison. It wouldn't surprise me if he wasn't receiving some kind of back-door financial and other support from US govt.
How do you know anything about North Korea? I'll bet you have never been there. You read all the propaganda releases by the American government and its captive press and you believe you know something.
What's your point? There would be exactly zero comments on these boards if we didn't believe we know something. I could go to North Korea, spend a lot of time there and still come away misinformed about the place. One thing I don't know is what the MSM says about it because I don't follow any of those outlets. So who's the one presuming to know something they in fact don't know, nimrod?
Haha, I get it now, that Max Ratt is one gai faggot. Had me goin' for a minute there.
What's your point? Are you trying to justify your ignorance, or are you bragging about it?
You seem to be very emotionally invested in something that you don't know.
#NORKLIVESMATTER
you fucking mules
sorry donkeys.
what a pony show
reuters is it
rothschilds is it
yes sir thank god we live here
thank god for are freedumbs
thank god mercedes does not make engines that explode sending the block 600 feet down the street.
thank god are pentagram does not have kill accident lists
thank god for gnome chumpski and say more hershey
if are leaders do bad gnome will tell us all about it or his orthodox jewish friend rupert murdoch.
Was probably a bit like this scene from "Saving Private Ryan"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHQxtgPp7fM
My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do... www.jobs-review.com
What would have happened
to the Shooter if he missed?
Every life must be lived.
When it comes to defending the consitution in this country, if you're not asleep behind the wheel, you won't even be allowed to drive.
Jesus H. Christ!
No before & after pictures like from Baltimore?
This is probably what it looked like (courtesy of isis)...
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c3a_1419101452
That left a mark.
red sand...
yo dude. head shot deer kick around for a bit, that guy motionless, done deal, brutal. guess that would be the way to go, fast and furious, just the anticipation would be the killer, ha...
overkill?
Megadeath
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KkVL-l6F5E
WTF is with these weird executions? Have they never heard of hanging, or a single shot to the head?
AA gun execution would've been a dramatic scene.
Next time he wants to up the ante, Lil Kim's gonna have to break out the missles!
You know I'm partial to the method he alledgedly employed on his Uncle.. being stripped, beaten and then fed to dozens of rabid dogs...
Dont you see? He was obviously trying to fly away.....
Swiss private school education eh.. you cant beat it..
Maybe when Dennis Rodman visits again.
Footage of Slick Willy falling asleep at MLK speech.
"Bill Clinton has a dream."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaDN5LM1t7Q
A weekend on orgy island will do that.
Dock that Chink a day's pay for napping on the job.
- Blazing Saddles
Now, come on, boys, where's your spirit? I don't hear no singing.
- Blazing Saddles
open casket?
No casket needed; just picking up the larger (soft ball size) fragments or just left them to the birds.
ZPU is a Russian made anti-aircraft gun using 14.5 mm ammunition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZPU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2f2e8eYGTE (I doubt he felt anything and I doubt there was much left of him)
Holy 30mm Norky chunks!!!
Coulda been worse, they coulda used a BB gun.
The execution would take several days.
North Koreans are near-sighted. A shotgun would have done the trick.
A year or two back he had some general bound to a stake and executed by mortar. Lil Kim likes to make a splash.
One way to take care having retirees.
This litle sissy is worse than his father. Stalin was feared until those around him became concerned about their own future.
How about inviting Mr Un to Brussels for some cleaning up ?
Oh - and he should not forget to bring that cal 20mm...
Anyone in for an invitation to DC ?
thanks, but no, thanks. I prefer to live in a "capital punishment free zone". (feel free to do that in DC, no skin off my nose)
speaking of that, Hungary's gov is talking about reintroducing the death penalty in the criminal code. I personally see that as a kind of political fetish
"...had not followed his orders several times..." This guy was too powerful to leave alive. Certainly the correct course of action from our dear leader, I would have done the same thing in his position.
I wonder if Kim invited Dennis Rodman for a game of hoop afterwards... Anti-aircraft gun--- I hope they passed out splatter shields before hand.
Ah, so this is where the baseball expression came from:
The runner was "caught napping", and was "picked off".
Looks like he's trying to imitate Stalin's great purges -total obedience through terror and murder for totally minor reasons. I doubt it will work as the world is now vewry much aware of Stalin's incredibly effective tactics and Kim Jong Un has a lot of enemies and should not be head of a country with nukes. I look for him to be removed -very soon.
"I look for him to be removed -very soon. "
Once they realize this brat can't even defend himself and fear for their own lives they'll remove him.
It's not minor at all, this guy was obviously a bomb waiting to go off. If he has the balls to disobey the great leader, the grandson of a god, multiple times, he just might have the balls to gather allies and depose him. Killing him with an anti-aircraft gun hopefully sends the message to any friends he might have had.
Love this shit.
Wake the fuck up, Merica....... this is politics at it's BEST. TRUTH WITH PURPOSE. RAW and CLEAR.
FIGHT CLUB IN THE LEGISLATOR'S HOUSES. Please take that bi-partisan bill-pablum shit out and DUEL !!
Tune in next week when a General sneaks in an RPG to the speech !!
FCR # 7 applies.
working as an undertaker in NK must be a bitch.
picking up all the pieces...
They have dogs for that.
Just saying: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.archiedunlop.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/obama1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/which-president-responded-better-to-a-natural-disaster/question-1095761/?page%3D2&h=297&w=350&tbnid=6fZaQENEB__2DM:&zoom=1&docid=ATRG0qHBNqXRgM&ei=0FBTVdzuE4iqggTSy4CYBw&tbm=isch&ved=0CB8QMygCMAI
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.salon.com/2011/04/joe_biden_falls_asleep_during_president_obamas_deficit_speech.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.salon.com/2011/04/13/biden_falls_asleep/&h=798&w=1056&tbnid=9Yc8kJ-Pb7M4KM:&zoom=1&docid=qXz--50_9_E8SM&ei=0FBTVdzuE4iqggTSy4CYBw&tbm=isch&ved=0CCYQMygJMAk
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000338033/polls_s_SUMMERS_SLEEPING_large_1505_825227_poll_xlarge.jpeg&imgrefurl=http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/larry-summers-asleep-at-the-wheel-is-obamas-economic-team-overworked/question-338033/&h=190&w=260&tbnid=moW1pZ68PVaNyM:&zoom=1&docid=vdOy4onitY8yXM&ei=0FBTVdzuE4iqggTSy4CYBw&tbm=isch&ved=0CCwQMygPMA8
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://scrapetv.com/News/News%252520Pages/Politics/Images/john-mccain-asleep.jpg&imgrefurl=http://scrapetv.com/News/News%2520Pages/Politics/pages/Barack-Obama-falls-asleep-at-rally-Scrape-TV-The-World-on-your-side.html&h=247&w=257&tbnid=j9UytDDKGpiWMM:&zoom=1&docid=LXe6Xo5z2DDAaM&ei=0FBTVdzuE4iqggTSy4CYBw&tbm=isch&ved=0CEUQMygeMB4
Google url shortener is your friend..... use it.
or www.tinyurl.com
If there is 'anything' that 'every' successful businessman knows, it is that the worst possible thing he could do would be to surround himself with "yes" men. They offer absolutely no feedback or valuable guidance. The only thing they might be useful for is sucking his dick... and they're even lousy at that because they can't say "yes" with their mouth full.
Kim Jong Un demonstrates openly, for the entire world to see, what an amateur he is. It will not end well for him. It can't... because he has basically isolated himself and insulated his own mind from being able to receive thoughts and ideas. He needs to read "Success for Dummies".
Successful dictators have a hands-off approach. They leave important stuff to those who know something about it. That's why when the dictator asks you something you say yes and then do things your own way while he returns to whatever it is he does. Basically how Stalin ran the war after he realized his own incompetence.
But he has continued the workers paradise!
government and business have some few parallels, but also some completely different realities. in short, too often have businesspeople regarded politics as something "similar"... and failed
particularly, a republic based on democratic institutions is a completely different beast then a dictatorship
a dictator has two options: either to behave more like Julius Caesar or to behave more like Caligula. the latter is easier, and it's a "tested method", all in all. rule by terror
“This may hurt the stability of his regime down the line” because the top brass in North Korea may feel threatened by Kim’s brutality, Oh said." - Kim will be dead within 2 years; likely sooner. He is paranoid delusional like our Congress, the difference is our Congress doesn't disobey orders and if they disagree, the then our "King" just bypasses them with Executive Orders and no one sheds a peep.
"Dock that Chink a day's pay for napping on the job."-Slim Pickens, Blazing Saddles
what's going to be used at the next execution, Big Bertha? maybe he should replace the firing squad leader for being such a bad shot.
'Atomic Annie', now that they've got the nukie thing down pat.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M65_Atomic_Cannon
(a miss is as good as a mile, horseshoes and handgrenades, carry on, just a scratch, etc.)
A cherry bomb up the arse would be the most hideous death other than sliding down a 40 foot razor blade into a vat of iodine.
ZZzzssssssssssh>>>>>>>>!
Big Bertha!
Where's the fun in that?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowing_from_a_gun
You could say it's a blow job you're not likely to forget. Or remember.
I sleep well at night knowing that this guy has nuclear arms.
We AAA'ed some folks.
Kim was brutal; but also merciful. Death by high explosive large caliber projectiles is as swift as it is bloody.
It is too bad that there were cowardly and short-sighted leaders in both the United States and South Korea in 1994. That was when North Korea went public with its nuclear weapons program. But neither the US nor ROK had the stomach for the 3-4 days of incredible violence that South Korea and the US Army's 2nd Division would have had to endure, before the heavily-fortified artillery positions on the North Korean side would have been destroyed by aerial bombardment.
This madness would never have happened. The two Koreas would be united, though it is difficult to determine how long it would have taken the South Korean Army to put down all resistence in the countryside.
Americans are often told that any appeasement offered to Iran or Russia is tantamount to a repeat of the Munich agreement. The policy of appeasement with North Korea has been disastrous and it is going to ultimately lead to nuclear blackmail or war, and probably both.
The allowance of evil political structures to continue and the diminishment of freedom is intentional. Your expectations are set way too high.
"you snooze, you loose" is taken literally there
Ho Li Fuk
Executed "in front of".....not sure about that language.
Anyone else long Coffee futures?
So now we know what the North Koreans want a nuke for, to assassinate anyone who might one day make fun of Kim Jong Un’s haircut behind his back.
Sounds like more zio-nonsense to keep the sheeple thinking they've got it great in the freedumb of Amerika.
That little garden gnome of a tyrant sure has a flair for executions. It's a pity we can ship Hillary, Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and some of our other human trash off to North Korea to see what imaginative way this guy would kill them.
I'd give you the thumbs up, but human depravity is so widespread (infects everyone from birth) and is revealed by degrees based on environmental, circumstantial and opportunistic factors. IOW, we all stand guilty and all will be judged unless they are born from above.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if we did ship them over there; Kim would just send them back as punishment to the U.S. and in the mean time they would be replaced with the same or worse.
You forgot Cruz, Boner, Mitch, and every sigle Bush. Don't play that shit with the two fake sides.
You are correct, of course. Put all of Kawngruss down range of that fat little maniac.
#northkoreanregimelivesmatter