This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Only 22 Countries Have Never Been Invaded By Britain (For Now)
While America may have troops in around 150 countries around the world, it still has not 'officially' invaded as many as Britain managed throughout its history... but there's still time.
Source: @MaxCRoser
* * *
Time to step up the American Empire game...
»
- 59349 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Damn.
Must... get... perfect... record...
Does dropping a pro-statist politician from a plane, without a parachute, on a country count as an invasion?
"Damn." Agree, I hate second place.
What a bunch of wankers.
The sun never sets on the empire
Rather impressive curriculum vitae for chappies into crossdressing and buggery a la the Dolphin, what?
Yes, eventually, if they work harder they'll catch up...
How many countries haven't been occupied by US military/intelligence bases?
You can hardly call that 'Occupied"...
The map (and the assertion) is just a plain lie.
Yes, the British Empire had great influence through the whole world, and it was very powerful at its peak. But "Only 22 Countries Have Never Been Invaded By Britain" and the whole world blue colored is beyond bullshit, it's IDIOTIC. E.g. when did Britain invade/rule South America (and we are talking about a lot of countries there)? There were just: 1) Several small islands in the Caribbean. 2) A couple of VERY TINY territories in the Caribbean coast (Guiana and Belize). 3) And the only important one, let's throw Argentine in because of the Falkland. Let's assume that invading some island 300 miles away from mainland Argentine counts like invading Argentine, no problem. Though with the same logic you could equally say that Argentine invaded England in 1982 when for a very short time they gained control of those same islands. But fine, let's count Argentine as invaded. And then you go and count the WHOLE continent (!?).
And I'm sure this same 'rigor' was applied to other parts of the world when doing the recount. No wonder politicians do what they do to the masses. You can throw whatever shit to people and they will take it with open mouth and closed eyes.
All Four Wheels Come Off The Anglo-American Juggernaut
but the US did it FASTER!
See, we are exceptional.
taking into account the cental bank financial system, i would say that the whole world until recently been occupied by anglo-american establishment.
Britain invaded the River Plate area twice in the 19thC, and once got as far as Buenos Aires before the local residents threw the forces out. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_invasions_of_the_R%C3%ADo_de_la_Plata . On that list, I think most Guatemalans feel that Belize was stolen from them by the Brits, so I would add Guatemala to the list of "invaded" countries...
I stand corrected about Argentine (though I had already put Argentine in the list). There should be no doubt, it should be a full fledged member of the list. Didn't know about the River Plate invasion, thanks Peribanu for the info.
They blockaded Venezuela and attacked Cartagena, Colombia, actually placing troops on the beach a la D day. They were defeated.
I suppose not all acts of combat count as invasions.
The guy who made this map is counting the pirates/corsairs/filibusters acting under British Flag, for example in the Wars against Spain when pirates avoid to be hanged when captured, if they were acting under permission or command of the British crown against their enemy as a Filibuster and for sharing the spoils contained in the ships (Beautiful GOLD, if you ask me).
An intelligent way to add numbers against an enemy.
A: Rum, buggery, and the lash.
Q: What was it that Churchill missed most about serving in the Royal Navy?
Being always drunk as he was it could have not been the rum.
Good job, I say, who would trust red coats in the dark? :)
The USA: Military Arm Of The New World Order
Is Pax Americana imposed bythe ‘Fourth Reich’?
The Sun Never Sets AND The Blood Never Dries in the (Entity Formerly Known As) the British Empire.
The Sun Never Sets AND THe Drones And Printing Presses Never Stop in the (Entity Soon to Be Known As the Former) American Empire.
Historical Accuracy and All! ¿No?
The Norman conquest of England in 1066 has traumatized the British for eternity. It probably explains the Anglo-Saxon need to (over)compensate.
Maybe it was the Viking raids in the North.
1066, interesting. King Harold Godwinson (Norse blood) defeats King Harald Hardrata (Norse). Duke (soon to be King) William (Norse blood) defeats King Harold.
1066 was more like a three way Norse wife swap party than a conquest of England.
EDIT: OTOH it might be said that all the real men of nordic decent were involved and this is why the nordic countries became such pansies while England developed, surprise surprise, a maritime empire. It was in the blood.
Well, Normans were not Scandinavians. They were a people of mixed ethnicity; the descendents of the troops under the command of a Viking chieftain called Rollo (whom historians believe to have been a Norwegian) who settled permanently in the north of France. He and his men intermarried with the local women after settling in Normandy at the behest of King Charles III, who offered them this land in exchange for their protection against incursions from other Norse warbands.
The Normans are an interesting case study in heterosis. In my opinion, they surpassed us Scandinavians in everything except naval exploration and ship construction techniques. Since I've fathered two children of a mixed heritage myself, I'm more interested in Norman history than I am in Viking history. I suppose I never was given to nationalist sentiment.
Your children are half black, which means they will be very intelligent (compared to most brown people), but are nearly retarded by white standards. You are a victim of the anti-white propaganda that is destroying all of the Scandinavian countries. I feel sorry for you. Your descendents are highly likely to be killed if social order ever breaks down in Europe (which is likely given the mass influx of inferior, 3rd world trash). Either the natives of your land will cleanse them or they will be taken out by "true black" brothas and Muslims.
You were never given to nationalist sentiment because you are a disgusting self hating beta male. You are the inferior scum of your own people and no white woman would have you. Luckily you come from an inconsequential country that nobody will truly miss as it descends into 3rd world savagery. Without "natives" to take care of them, all of the "refugees" will die off after 1 Scandinavian winter. The few who survive will get back on the boats and try to flood into Denmark, England, and Germany.
Too right. it's sad but they'll always be second...
Britannia either Ruled The Waves, or Waived The Rules.
America was a quick study.
Fucking British assholes.
Please, Old Chap. You mustn'y Candy-Coat it for us!
I disagree with this article. In the modern era the word "invaded" has new meaning. I challenge you to find many places without the scar of a McDonald's or central bank.
Peak Conquest? Need more planets to invade chaps!
it's a shame they didn't do a better job.... at least the whole world would be speaking english and have a reasonable rule of law..... mock the british all you like..... in their day they kicked ass..... they added far more to the world than the romans ever did...
Kazakhstan never been invaded by Brits.
Perhaps they didn't know about your high quality potassium?
You know what would happen if you took a gun and went around shooting everyone around the block?
They would get together (Like China, Russia, India, Iran, Brazil, and many other nations are doing at this time) and kick the living shit out of you!!!
Enjoy those Nuclear Fly-Bys UK....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/11606045/RAF-jets-scrambl...
And the West hasn't got together? Is the West not united in the shape and form of North Atlantic Terrorist Organization? You know how many sovereign countries have that largest terrorist organization in the world attacked or invaded by now?
Incidentally, you know how Britania "invaded" Russia? They got together with the French, Ottomans (Turks) and Sardinians and attacked Russia.
Do not forget the allied invasion during the Russian Revolution.
During the Basmachi revolt the British were actively sowing dissent in Alash Orda in hopes of a more favorable government being installed. I think that counts. A covert, soft invasion is still an invasion.
Not, 'sowing dissent' is not what a normal person would understand by invasion (forceful presence of troops).
But if 'sowing dissent' counts as an invasion to you, then the article is even more wrong, The American Empire wouldn't have to step up anything, under your 'sowing dissent' premise the American Empire has FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR outperformed the British Empire, far like in light years of outperformance. Then you indeed should color the whole fucking map (not 22 countries remaining, not even one) with Stars and Stripes. By the way, add also a star map and chalk up the Moon to the Americans too thanks to the Apollo 11.
If Greece can ask for reparations from Germany, maybe all the countries in this world save 22 can ask for reparations too. Churchill deliberately starved 4 million Indians during World War II accounting for more than 90% of the casualties of the British Empire during that war:
How Sir Winston Churchill Starved 4 Million Indians
Madhusree Mukerjee’s book [Churchill’s Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India during World War II, New York, Basic Books, 2010] is not a denunciation of British rule of India, but a meticulous chronicling of the role of the British Raj in furthering a famine in Bengal, and suppressing the fact that this deliberate holocaust took 4 million lives. British historians, including Sir Winston Churchill in his five-volume memoir, glossed over this rather ‘irrelevant incident.’
http://www.vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=1396
British torture in Kenya during the Mau Mau revolt in the 1950s:
Interrogation under torture was widespread. Many of the men were anally raped, using knives, broken bottles, rifle barrels, snakes and scorpions. A favourite technique was to hold a man upside down, his head in a bucket of water, while sand was rammed into his rectum with a stick. Women were gang-raped by the guards. People were mauled by dogs and electrocuted. The British devised a special tool which they used for first crushing and then ripping off testicles. They used pliers to mutilate women's breasts. They cut off inmates' ears and fingers and gouged out their eyes. They dragged people behind Land Rovers until their bodies disintegrated. Men were rolled up in barbed wire and kicked around the compound.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/apr/23/british-empire-crim...
the 'tribe' ran the british empire...........just as they run the american empire....
to understand how the american empire operates, one must fist understand how the british empire operated.....
the british wrote the book on torture and genocide....
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p389_John.html
''Interrogation under torture was widespread. Many of the men were anally raped, using knives, broken bottles, rifle barrels, snakes and scorpions. A favourite technique was to hold a man upside down, his head in a bucket of water, while sand was rammed into his rectum with a stick. Women were gang-raped by the guards. People were mauled by dogs and electrocuted. The British devised a special tool which they used for first crushing and then ripping off testicles. They used pliers to mutilate women's breasts. They cut off inmates' ears and fingers and gouged out their eyes. They dragged people behind Land Rovers until their bodies disintegrated. Men were rolled up in barbed wire and kicked around the compound.''
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/apr/23/british-empire-crim...
all so the fucking queen could drink fucking tea........
The Guardian (Leftist propaganda) then a history revisionist and Nazi sympathizer website.
Ah yes the "Auschwitz Myth":
No no, the witnesses all lied, so did the survivors, the Holocaust was all made up. American and Russian soldiers were instructed to make it all up. The Nuremburg trials were unfair, blah blah blah. People like you are disgusting.
the jew genocide is small potatoes compared to other genocides but for some strange reason, the jew genocide is the only one taught in High School????
why is that???
http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/
The thing is that none of the survivors actually counted the dead, or verified their jewishness. The survivors can only tell of their own personaly experience and apparently lots of them survived by not being where the action happened, as in forests and going from camp to camp while never getting killed, somehow.
I guess that's one more thing Winston Churchill had in common with Phil Sheridan.
And I'm just observing the following:
When my children bicker too long or things escalate beyond acceptable bounds, I step in as a good father. Cause I'm a responsible and caring father, even though I normally give them the "Freedom" to play, learn, make mistakes, figure things out and evolve.
Given that we are all ALLEGEDLY "God's children", we don't see the "Dad on the Sky" stepping in. Ever. "But He loves you". That's rich.
"When my children bicker too long or things escalate beyond acceptable bounds, I step in as a good father. Cause I'm a responsible and caring father, even though I normally give them the "Freedom" to play, learn, make mistakes, figure things out and evolve.
Given that we are all ALLEGEDLY "God's children", we don't see the "Dad on the Sky" stepping in. Ever. "But He loves you". That's rich."
Excellent summation of a very valid viewpoint, one that I shared for many years. Over the years I've begun to see things a bit differently, but I'm not going to thump any Bibles or throw a copy of the Bhagavid Gita at you. I am going to suggest that the ineffable is very real, but any agendas that may come with that might be very different than what you might think; consider the possibility that this reality exists for purposes of demonstration.
I'd also suggest taking a few moments to check out the idea of "biocentrism" as proposed by Robert Lanza. Not saying it's the be-all and end-all of answers, it's not; it's an incomplete and flawed theory, but nonetheless very intriguing for the questions it raises. Science stopped proving that the ineffable doesn't exist around 1900 or so, the work of Max Planck and the inquiries into quanta and the nature of quantum mechanics, quantum entanglement etc. tend to move science in the other direction.
If you begin with the idea that first there was dead matter, and then somehow consciousness evolved, then a purely materialistic worldview could perhaps be made to make sense. But if consciousness is a key component of reality, as quantum mechanics would seem to indicate, then a purely materialistic worldview is obviously incomplete. In fact, if matter exists in an undetermined state until it is observed, as quantum physics appears to be showing us, then it's not that far of a stretch to say that all living, conscious things are quite literally "dreaming the world into being" as a shaman might say.
If this is the case then how connected are we? By "we" I mean to include every single living thing in the entire cosmos, including things that are "alive" in ways we have yet to understand. What would we call that inter-connected totality of consciousness?
The problem is the massive crushing force of materialist dogma. Many think they need money to "exist" This new slave-being is the anathema of the old sacred path. One really exists outside monetisation but one obviously needs sustenance but that is no anvil to forge the mindless subservience of the modern soul.
Excellent summary EE, proving The Ineffable's existence by scientific means. The funny part is all conclusions on this subject that science comes up with fit in perfectly with the teachings of old, whether it's Hermeticism, Shamanism, Sufiism or what not.
@Kirk: consider for a second that everything is pre-arranged according to a Grand Scheme of Things (like Nostradamus correctly predicting the time of his death, but not being able to do anything to change the undesired course of events). The Earth is a school, we're all here with a purpose...
Or as my ancestors believed, we all have a fate. One day your string will be cut and you will die. What you do and how you live until then is up to you and the God(s) will judge you by that.
conscious things are quite literally "dreaming the world into being" as a shaman might say.
Actually that is a very accurate statement. But the mind can never understand consciousness as consciousness is prior to the mind.
When you are sleeping, consciousness stirs and creates time and space and a whole world including you in a split second and you start dreaming. Dreams appear as real as waking state while they last. In your dream, you also exist and you watch the dream but you have no control over the dream. Only on waking, you know that everything in dream was your own self.
The waking state is also a dream of consciousness which always brings time and space and manifestation with it. When you wake up from the dream of life, also called enlightenment, you know that all manifestation is your own self. But you can only know that when the mind is absent. It is different way of knowing, it is prior to the mind. Meditation is used to quieten the mind so that it vanishes and you know that you are pure being immanent in all manifestation.
Prior to consciousness is awareness, your eternal state on which consciousness arises as a dream. When you are in deep sleep, consciousness is at rest so there in no body and no world but awareness is always present so you can say that on waking that you slept well on or not.
Everyone tries to understand all this with the mind but you cannot know the subjective truth with an objective mind that exists in consciousness. God is only a concept since all manifestation is composed of consciousness and cognized by consciousness. Or you may call consciousness God if you want. All is consciousness, and all manifestation is one consciousness that appears as a dream on the eternal, ineffable, infinite awareness that is immanent in all manifestation.
That is all very interesting. I really mean that. However, given the battle looming before us, do we really have time to sit around navel gazing as we contemplate the meaning of consciousness and interconnectedness with things we don't/can't even recognize as living?
Before you stands the enemy. He means to slaughter you, rape your women, and enslave your children if he doesn't absolutely destroy the entire world in the process. Don't forget to pay your taxes.
Well hell Kirk, what stops you from doing everything and anything you want since there are obviously no permanent consequences? People's lives don't matter. Nothing matters. Eventually there won't be an earth nor a history nor a student to learn our history. If there is no God there is no punishment and so there really is no crime. You might as well do what you will because the only thing stopping you is you.
But you have morals and ethics and all that ethereal bullshit right? So sit by and watch as the demons that walk the earth plunder, rape, and destroy because you think it wrong for you to harm someone because of some concept of being better than all that. Keep typing on a keyboard denying eternity because that is the superior approach.
Don't believe in anything. Do do anything. Adds up to nothing.
These are all slanderous lies. Everybody knows how civilized the Brits are. They build their empire by drinking tea and eating cookies with the natives.
Richard Burton who played Winston Churchill in a British production titled "Three Days in May" was subsequently banned from the BBC for saying this:
“In the course of preparing myself…I realized afresh that I hate Churchill and all of his kind. I hate them virulently. They have stalked down the corridors of endless power all through history… What man of sanity would say on hearing of the atrocities committed by the Japanese against British and Anzac prisoners of war, “We shall wipe them out, everyone of them, men, women, and children. There shall not be a Japanese left on the face of the earth”? Such simple-minded cravings for revenge leave me with a horrified but reluctant awe for such single-minded and merciless ferocity.”
Interesting but they did not go on to kill every nipster now did they. I cannot defend everything Churchill but can allow that everyone is prone to make emotional statements when an atrocity is visited upon those they cherish. Churchill did seem to genuinely care about his people. Perhaps not caring about others made him a monster of sorts but in war such monsters have much value.
Either way, Churchill is dead and not a problem for anyone anymore.
A nation of slackers, I tells ya!
We can beat that number if we all pull together as a team.
with bad teeth and horrible food.
Just issue Letters of Marque and its all quite "legal" ;-)
Lipstick on a pig. A real dictatorship doesn't need such silly formalities. Coming soon when wealth can no longer be extracted from the plebs.
Miffed
What is to stop a private group from declaring independence and issuing the same letters for warfare against the state?
Wow, the sun never set on the ZioEmpire.
and the blood never dried...........
That's called continuity.
Don't eff with Mongolia.
When the British resident of Bolivia was attacked Queen Victoria had the country removed from maps when she found out it was landlocked and could not be bombarded by imperial warships. Kazakhstan and Mongolia were also securely beyond reach. The virtually inaccessable Tibet fell to British land forces in 1904, however. Monks with swords and archaic muzzle-loaders had little chance against the Empire's machine-guns. The casualty score was 5,000 to 5 against the Tibetans. Francis Younghusband, who led the assault, suffered mind-changing effects during the expedition and afterwards became an expounder of free love. spiritualism and a translater of oriental transcendental works. In fact this impeccable Sandhurst trained servant of the Empire had become Tibetan.
I guess British, German, Jewish, and Americans have Fantastic Ideas of Spirituality... one could even say this type of Spiritual Pursuit is as much hidden as it is a Passion...
Very unexpected compared to Media portrayals.
"The Incarnation of Ahriman. The Embodiment of Evil on Earth." Rudolf Steiner 1919.
Temple balls can do that to you...
Some disagreement exists about events in Kenya.
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2011/04/old-evil-still-craving-blood.html
A sample from a reader comment to the blog.
"I lived in Rhodesia in the 1970s and the situation was quite similar there. Mugabe's thugs performed some of the most outrageous atrocities during the war, mostly against black civilians. The 'western' media carefully ignored it all, while publishing outlandish accusations against the Rhodesians. We see the same story in South Africa today. There never seems to be a shortage of such creatures as Elkins in their university ivory towers to spew lies and slanders against the creators and protectors of civilisation."
Jim Donald writes of today's Brittania:
A handful of Blackwater mercenaries can defeat a large horde of Arabs, a handful of Arabs can defeat a horde of British soldiers, which suggests that Blackwater could conquer Britain quite easily if ever the Pentagon were to let them off the leash, or the Pentagon’s hand became too feeble to grip the leash. The weakness of Europe makes reversion to seventh century anarcho-piratism a real possibility.
How the mighty have fallen!
The eighth century was also exciting.
O how we long for the Seventh and Eight Centuries!
Libertarian Nirvana!
The tenth was excellent!
The idea of returning to those times sure beats living with the knowledge that there is a single man a thousand miles away who can point a finger and kill me with a weapon I will never even see coming.
Maybe but who wants the shitty weather and even shittier food?
They come to steal the women, of course:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2532094/Welcome-Britain-2014-Sha...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1182373/Welcome-binge-Britain-Po...
'which suggests that Blackwater could conquer Britain quite easily if ever the Pentagon were to let them off the leash, or the Pentagon’s hand became too feeble to grip the leash.'
Seriously? You guys can't even fly into a Pakistani compound and shoot an unarmed Osama Bin Laden without losing a fucking helicopter, and we all still remember Desert 1.
Frankly the world wonders how you Yanks manage to get into and out of the crapper without shitting yourselves.
I suspect the Russians are far less bothered than you think about the prospect of US involvement in Ukraine...
Complete non-sequitur, as none of your examples involve Arabs, British, or Blackwater.
For an example of what mercenaries can accomplish, see how Executive Outcomes ended Sierra Leone's civil war with fewer than 100 soldiers. Under immense pressure from the international community the SL government then canceled EO's contract and replaced them with thousands of UN peacekeepers. The rebels promptly regrouped and restarted the war.
You might equally say that a Vietnamese rabble with no air power or serious weapons defeated US. The US out guns all other powers combined. So a Vietnamese rabble could conquer all other powers combined.
Better bomb and poison the shit out of them again.
Ah, the good old days.
Taking a look at Britain today, I could have sworn it is the one that has been invaded.
The Empire Strikes Back...or maybe Britain is the last foothold of the British Empire.
Pfff, next best thing to slave labor overseas, cheap resources & goods overseas, IS CHEAP LABOR here at home... it you are the Money Trust, Nabob.
And cheap Labor at home can be Colonial Policemen too.
WTF do they care. Army needs Lads as well.
"...maybe Britain is the last foothold of the British Empire"
Exactly.
In the days of Britain's colony Hong Kong (or any other British colony come to that), it's difficult to see much difference between how the appointed Governor of HK ran the country and the way in which Britain itself is governed by the democratically elected government which has never received a majority support from the people. Even the pomp is comparable.
The major difference is that the ruler in HK was called "Governor" but back home it's called "King or Queen". All are above the law and are parasites living on the backs of ordinary people.
In both cases it is not The People who decide policy, have laws passed in their name or decide anything of import. Everything is decided by a ruling elite who themselves are controlled or answerable to people in the shadows who control the "Security Services" (apparently protecting The State - whatever that is) and financial manipulators connected in The City.
Just to round things off, Britain has no proper written Constitution since that would reduce the powers and remove a lot of flexibility of the elites to do as they wish and exert totalitarian control over the country by passing whatever laws they want to protect themselves and their criminal practices.
UK governance of Hong Kong dod not prevent it from becoming a thriving centre for interanional commerce and banking.
A bloody rancorus bunch, I might add!
I wonder why they always had their knickers all up in a twist?!
no one want to invade the mongols :(
So Britain invaded San Marino??
And Switzerland ???
No shit. Even Hitler was wise enough to leave Switzerland alone.
A rifle behind every snowbank.
There is no American empire and it is dangerous to present an American empire as a concept. The United States of America hasn't existed officially since the NWO took down the World Trade Centers.
So Britain was a hegemonic, imperialistic, military-banking industrial complex just like the United States before it was cool?
Absolutely true, but they almost always left countries better than they found them - not in flames like the US
The tribe is in trouble, their NWO is comming apart.
Truer words were never spoken. The men behind the NWO curtain is about to get the shit kicked out of them.
and the lesson is? evil wins. all you peace loving wankers are pussies. you lose!
The map is BS. No country in Balkan was ever invaded by Britania.
And while we at it, incidentally, do you Muricanos and idiotic Scandinavos (I found one here) know who the Anglos are? Do you know that Anglos came to Britania from Iberian penninsula, hm? You can read the work of Brittish geneticist Stephen Oppeneheimer who found out that most of Brittish population have Iberian ancestors. Genes which are unique for the Germans make less than 5% of Britania genepool. So the question arises, who were those people from Iberian penninsula who travelled over France and Holland (via Amsterdam) to finally settle in Britania? Go on, guess Muricanos. Lets see how you connect 2 pieces of a puzzle.
Better I do it for you, hm? You could catch a brain fewer from such a strenuous undertaking. hehehe Part of that people who came to Britania from Iberian penninsula, and which make majority of genetic makeup of Britania today, were Phoenicians. But do Muricanos know who Phoenicians were? You can search it, though it is never quite accurate since most of the sources are Anglo ones; and Anglo sources, as we all well know, are mostly corrupted with half-truths or even outright lies. They came to Iberian peninsula from northern Africa, sometime after Rome had destroyed Carthage. They are of the same genetic makeup as the true Jews (not those Askhenazis from old Khazaria). The Punics were people of traders mostly, but they did almost end Rome. Capable organizers. Have you heard of Hannibal? He was one of the greatest military commanders world has ever seen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal
So, you see, part of Anglos are not of European origin. And now you know why Anglos have always been so eager to accept the rule of their Jewish overlords. They are a cuckoo's egg.
p.s.
And here is also something very educational for you. Behold the nature of the cuckoos. :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SO1WccH2_YM
What exactly is your point? Europe is a made up land parcel, neither countries nor borders are real. Over millenia people move over the whole earth as they migrate. No one is european any more than they are melonesian, scientifically speaking.
Europeans as a whole came from the middle east and middle eastern peoples came from Africa. You are not breaking any news here.
No, you idiot! There are set of unique distinctiveness which differentiates groups ofpeople inhabiting the lands you mentioned. Tens or even hundreds of thousands of years have made sure of that. There is a certain set of genes only attributed to Germans, Baltic nations, Romanians, etc. have, and you won't find their disctinctiveness in Semites in Arabian peninsula or anywhere else on the planet. That is how different species come to be. You must be some Marxist Jewish Murican scum, hm, trash?
I know what you are saying, you are getting all pavlovian on me. Im sure each time you hear something similar to what i wrote you go ape shit accusing everyone of being anti white rather than anti racist, no?
Of course thousands of years change the genetic make up of a population but, other than that effect, which is real, all populations migrate across the entire planet. They also share plenty of genes so, all populations share most of their genes, just not all of them with the same frequency.
Europeans came from the middle east, and changed a bit while being there.
No, scum! People do not migrate all over the world, nor they ever have, else there would not be those distinciveness which seperates them. In order distinciveness to form, there first must be isolation. Isolation is a requirement for distinctiveness to form, you stupid Jewish scum! That is how species form to begin with, Jew!
They migrate very slowly. Understand the concept?
Let me put it this way, humans mutate faster than they migrate.
Tell me, how exacly is any group in Eurasia isolated from any other group? The mongols coould cross the whole continent in weeks on horseback.
You think in tha last 20.000 years no one traveled from India to Turkey?
They did not migrate, you Jewish idiot! There is no specific point on the planet at which you can point and say: "this is where humans began." Do you, Jewish retard, can even understand such a simple thought, hm? Eurasia is a very big, huge part of planetary landmass, Jew. It is that vastness that enabled isolation... separated different groups.
I didnt say that there is a point on which they originated but, whatever their source, humans move around. Mostly by foot. On horseback and now by plane.
The niggers were taken to the americas by boat. Isnt that a migration? Didnt they move as well?
Didnt the europeans moved into the americas, north and south, and australia?
Didnt the vikings settled siberia, which is now Russia?
Didnt the arabs invaded half the world from France to India?
People do move around.
Yes, they move, and when they stray into lands occupied by another people, they get killed (if they are not stronger to prevail that is). Those different ethnicities have always guarded their borders. How stupid you have to be not to know such a basic fact?
And Niggers in Murica haven't taken anything that Europeans there, mostly of degenerate Anglo origins, hadn't given them first. They even started a civil war to make Niggers their equal, or that is official story they like to sell -- I wouldn't trust it however. heheh
And those "moving around" you speak of have always come in terms of conquest, except in this time of Western globalization -- and look at all the problems it is causing, Jew!
Are you like 6? Did you just discovered books? Did you learned how to read a month ago?
You are describing to me the concept that when people move into territories occupied by others they either kill or get killed... Like in a war. You just described what war is, in general, as an argument.
Never heard of that before.
You are incapable of taking a statement for what its worth without weaving a novel around it. First you say people never move. Then that they move, but only with war. Despite having wrote a post telling us the revelation that phoenicians, spaniards and british are related because of movement, of migration, and because of roman war.
As if that is somehow a counterpoint.
Dathedr, have you read the recent articles on VT about Khazarian mafia?
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/08/proposed-declaration-of-war-agai...
Btw, everytime I link to these posts on VT, I get banned and comments deleted. No matter you are on infowars or any other local news site (even non-english!), my posts disapear.
No, hadn't known of that site before you mentioned it.
And there is apsolutely no evidence whatsoever that humans came from Africa, scum,just like there is no evidence that humans evolved from the apes! Apsolutely none! They are all made on belief, on stories and nothing more. There is not a single piece of evidence that supports Darwin theory, or any otherAnglo story about genesis. None. Nada. Zilch. They all run on belief just like religion runs on the same fuel.
Frankly i dont give a shit. If you want to kill all the niggers, more power to you.
I don't want to kill Negroes, Jew! I want Negroes to be confined to their land, to sub-Saharan Africa and part of Murica which belongs to them, so that evolution can continue.
You cant confine them, goy! You cant confine anyone!
Pass a law, close the borders, kill the jewish corrupters. And then, after your death, the niggers will keep moving because they cannot be confined with your stupid laws and magical confinement techniques.
If you want the planet you have to kill the opposition. Or ther descendants will fuck up your descendants. Its a matter if time.
Are you listening to yourself? Niggers are to be confined to some specific part of america? And you expect them to remain there, even after your death, centuries from now, when you will be powerless to do anything about anything?
Well, we shall see, Jew!
How? How could we possibly see?
Are you planning on pinning people to specific locations forever, frozen in time forever centuries after your death, just so that evolution can take place as if its some sort of personal project for you?
If you were serious you would recognize there is no solution but to endlessly wage war and kill all the competition. Didnt your messiah "Andrew Mc Donald" taught you?
BTW, there are no "true jews". Jews are not even mentioned in the bible. The closest would be yehudans which were but one tribe out of the 12 tribes of Israel. All of the tribes supposedly descended from Abraham and that makes them "chosen" by God, at least ccording to Abraham, but them would the arabs since they also descend from Abraham through Ishmael and anyone whos genetic tree included at least one jew in the last 3000 years. Most of humanity i'm sure.
Idiotic. Populations have been migrating and going around in circles ever since. All of humanity is genetically related up to a point. We share 50% of our genes with Bananas. Are you half banana?
The atlantic coast from Portugal to Norway was traveled in both ways by many peoples, both on foot and by boat.
The British Empire succeeded on the back of vast relative technological advantage thanks to the industrial revolution starting in Britain.
The US military-industrial-complex is nothing in relative comparison to the Victorian British version. The Brits found it easy to take over large countries by installing key integrated settlements or taking existing ones, protected by arms and thuggery, with plenty of deception, using fear and the threat thereof, plus real atrocity where 'necessary' I'm sure.
Imagine a world with modern-conventional forces only, no nuclear, space, smart or special anything; just capable brute force and numbers (much like Ukraine), the US military-industrial-complex and NATO would have no chance of taking over Russia, China, India, Iran, France, Brazil or South Africa.
With nukes, space, smart and special military capabilities that are now affordable to even tinpot nations, the whole notion of global war, conquest and empire has been turned on its head.
The age of empires has passed, and the US should now work with the multipolar world to dismantle their empire as painlessly as possible, just as the Brits did in the 20th century. The world needed Britain to survive, just as we need the US to survive, and not just because we're worried about going down with their ship, but because the world really could be a sustainable and exceptional place to live, if we all work sensibly together.
South Africa?? Weird choice, but militarily, as well as economically, not what it used to be, by far!!.
It could be taken over by conventional forces far easier today than when the British did it in the Boer war.
Nobody there today would be able to offer any serious resistance. The whites there haven't got the heart in it like they used to. Sadly.
16 million niggers on pcp with sharp machetes, running towards you.
brits never invaded russia . no one ever invaded them
I don't know what you paid for school fees, but whatever it was, it was too much! :-)
young british and american boys, flew over Dresdin and killed children and women and old folks by the thousands- they are hero's just ask WWII vets - or any .gov pol.
I am amazed that "total war" was done by good boys, knowing they were killing civilians by the thousands. with no PTSD?
Sarcastic comment . I forgot to add ' ? ' mark there .
They did, together with the French, Turks (Ottomans) and Sardinians from 1853 to 1856. The Turks had declared war to Russia and suffered a defeat, at which point the French, Brits and Sardinians joined the war on the Turkish side.
I believe a bunch of euro countries and the US invaded Russia during the civil war. Fought with the whites against the red army back when Lenin was still alive.
Hot Trotsky commanded the Russian Red Army against that invasion. There is a captured British tank still on display in Arkangel today from that invasion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Russia_Intervention
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_War
Those are examples that specifically involve the Brits. The French, Turks, Germans, and others had their own adventures.
thanx replacement
Many countries have invaded Russia, but invaders goes home with the quarter of their initial force.
No, they crawl!
The list is fake. Britain never invaded central-eastern europe, countries like: Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Austria, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia etc. Also much of Latin America, they were colonized by Spain and Portugal. And many countries in Asia: Kazakhstan, Armenia, Georgia, Turkmenistan ... etc. It´s just fake.
I know for a fact, Britain, Spain and France were invasion force that landed in Veracruz, Mexico and were turned back at La batalla de la Puebla on Cinco de Mayo 1862.
Interesting, i thought only the french were involved.
Fake indeed. But it's coming from Anglo production so it goes as fake by definition.
Dont about all of south america but Britain once blockaded Venezuela, took over Trinidad and Guyana (former spanish territory), took over Malvinas (Falklands) from Argentina. The british navy also attacked Cartagena and Panama.
While not technically an invasion, an example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied-occupied_Austria
England currently has or has had troops stationed in ALL of the Euro countries you mentioned, some on a rotational basis.
England has been a lot less involved in SA as you state. Of course, SA is not part of NATO.
Washintdon D.C. has London beat. In June it will invade the United States of America.
Neither has Switzerland.
Check out the video on the Empire of 3 Cities. It references a book. The book says, "Britian never invades Germany, because it is a buffer to Russia. It never invades Japan, because it is a buffer to China."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1nxTEUSIdo
That is kind of intelligence insulting stuff Anglos are well known for.
Article claims that US has troops in 150 countries. Embassies and consulates don't count. Sure, they have marines guarding there but they are like SECURITY guards. Its not like we are maintaining a military presence there to intimidate and occupy.
Nobody caught the exaggeration, except me of course.
I didn't count them but there are a lot: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_military_bases
Why do people think that the U.S is separate from the U.K
The United States is still a British Colony
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/united_states_british_col...
In 1867 we all became equal slaves of the crown and the goal was completed in 1913 with the federal reserve. We have always been under banker control except the very few years when Andrew Jackson paid the debt and kicked the bankers out and almost lost his life
Is the spread of civilization an invasion?
If so, is it immoral?
Did Saddam Hussein's regime have a right to exist?
Are rights individual or collective?
Do countries that do not respect the rights of individuals have the right to exist?
Did the Confederacy, which was trying to perpetuate slavery, have a right to secede?
Has China, which has been an unfree society, had the right to retake Taiwan, a predominantly free society?
Questions raised by the original post.