This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Only 22 Countries Have Never Been Invaded By Britain (For Now)
While America may have troops in around 150 countries around the world, it still has not 'officially' invaded as many as Britain managed throughout its history... but there's still time.
Source: @MaxCRoser
* * *
Time to step up the American Empire game...
»
- 59348 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
In theory, you ask a lot of interesting question.
In practice, the victors write the history.
Consider that when contemplating how to make the world a better place.
The most immoral thing about war is losing.
never in the histry of human con tricks has so much been taken
from so many by so jewish few.
we will fight them with lies
erasing histry with liguistics and rubber eraser
with frank kitson low level military operations
pseudo gangs will be are weapon spea.
we will smash them with david sterling sas hit and run dressed up as local.
small teams big results
discretion are mantra
we will use all the power of tavistock institute of syco logiculls to snuff them out.
have local fighting local while we grab the loot.
united services institute and chatham house will be are ideas masonic chamber.
all this to add to the glory of the rothschild portfolio
England has to its credit the longest standing unbroken international alliance, has been allied to Portugal since 1365.
Portugal, huh? What a coincidence.
Both are former colonial powers, now crumbled into poverty and insignificance.
We're good at drinking and fighting.....get over it! Article is nonsense though.
Still, the UK government will now echo US foreign policy after it's election so the world will be a safer place, cough, splutter!
Any of the contenders would follow US slavishly and offer whatever assistance they can on any half baked murderous venture.
I suppose with 10 major US bases, UK is essentially occupied.
I haven't been back in 20 years, but I still feel deep shame when I see this happen. UK should have acted as a restraining influence, after all they have plenty of experience , or at least, abstained.
So, why did the Anglo-Saxon’s go berserk? An island people are always paranoid, but this paranoia accelerated when they became parasitized by credit master means out of Amersterdamn; At this point in history, the Sephardic and Ashkenazi had fled to Amsterdamn due to their former money means being crushed by Portugal. The East West flow of Gold and Silver via Caravan routes was usurped when Vasco de Gama discovered the Southern route. The caravan routes were a lucrative trade where exchange rates differences between countries could be maneuvered to take parasitic rents. Spices and Slaves moved along these routes as well.
After the East West mechanism was broken, Jews needed a new way to take rents on host populations, so they invented the Credit money system. The maneuvering to get back in Britain, after their expulsion, was done with credit money means, ultimately culminating in the private (central) bank of England in 1694:
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDFs/The_Nameless_War.pdf
America became hosted and parasitized fully by this mechanism in 1912, but was under attack since the the very beginning, especially the war of 1812. So, now America also behaves in a bezerk fashion, outside of its constitution. The parasite controls the brain center, not political action under will of its people.
An excerpt from the “Nameless War.”
The Jews were once again permitted to land freely in England in spite of strong protests by the sub-committee of the Council of State, which declared that they would be a grave menace to the State and the Christian religion. Perhaps it is due to their protests that the actual act of banishment has never to this day been repealed. “The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding one … From that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases of revolution.” —Isaac Disraeli (My addition: Jews think in terms of revolution, and what they can gain…morality seldom enters their calculus.) There were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in France. In 1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile hands in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. In that document we read this remarkable sentence: “Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our hands.” [Protocol No.3] The Nameless War 4 The Elders might have made the passage even fuller, and written, “Remember the British and French revolutions, the secrets of which are well known to us for they were entirely the work of our hands.” The difficult problem of the subjugation of both Kingdoms was still however unsolved. Scotland was Royalist before everything else; and she had proclaimed Charles II King. Cromwell’s armies marched round Scotland, aided by their Geneva sympathizers, dispensing Judaic barbarity; but Scotland still called Charles II King. He moreover accepted the Presbyterian form of Christianity for Scotland; and slowly but steadily the feeling in England began to come round to the Scottish point of view. Finally upon the death of Cromwell, all Britain welcomed the King’s restoration to the throne of England. In 1660 Charles II returned; but there was an important difference between the Kingdom he had fled from as a boy, and the one to which he returned as King. The enemies of Kingship were entrenched within his kingdom now, and as soon as the stage should be set for renewing the propaganda against the papacy and so, dividing once more persons, all of whom considered themselves as part of Christ’s Church, the next attack would develop. The next attack would aim at placing the control of the finances of both Kingdoms in the hands of the Jews, who were now firmly ensconced within. Charles evidently had no consciousness of the Jewish problem or plans, or the menace they held for his peoples. The wisdom and experience of Edward I had become lost in the centuries of segregation from the Jewish virus. A consciousness of the danger to the Crown in placing his enemies in possession of the weapon of a “Popish Plot” cry he did retain. With James II’s accession, the crisis could not be long delayed. The most unscrupulous pamphleteering and propaganda (my addition: Note similarity to using a consolidated press in the U.S, to then spread propaganda) was soon in full swing against him, and it is no surprise to find that many of the vilest pamphlets were actually printed in Holland. This country was now quite openly the focus for all disaffected persons; and considerable comings and goings took place during these years. Stories were brought to the King that his own brother-in-law had joined those who plotted against him; but he utterly refused to credit them, or take any action till news came that the expedition against himself was actually under way. The chief figure amongst those who deserted James at that crucial juncture was John Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough. It is interesting to read in the Jewish Encyclopedia that this Duke for many years received not less than 6,000 pounds a year from the Dutch Jew Solomon Medina. ( My addition: This is similar to Winston Churchill being bailed out after his bankruptcy, and then his behavior suddenly changes, and becomes more judaic.) The real objective of the “Glorious Revolution” was achieved a few years later in 1694, when the Royal consent was given for the setting up of the “Bank of England” and the institution of the National Debt. This charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal prerogative of minting money; converted the basis of wealth to gold; and enabled the international money lenders to secure their loans on the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful undertaking of some ruler or potentate which was all the security they could previously obtain. From that time economic machinery was set in motion which ultimately reduced all wealth to the fictitious terms of gold which the Jews control; and drained away the life blood of the land, the real wealth which was the birthright of the British peoples. The political and economic union of England and Scotland was shortly afterwards forced upon Scotland with wholesale corruption, and in defiance of formal protests from every county and borough. The main objects of the Union were to suppress the Royal Mint in Scotland, and to force upon her, too, responsibility for the “National Debt.” The grip of the moneylender was now complete throughout Britain. The danger was that the members of the new joint Parliament would sooner or later, in the spirit of their ancestors, challenge this state of affairs. To provide against this, therefore, the party system was now brought into being, frustrating true national reaction and enabling the wire-pullers to divide and rule; using their newly-established financial power to ensure that their own men and their own policies should secure the limelight, and sufficient support from their newspapers, pamphlets, and banking accounts to carry the day.( My addition: This is exactly the condition of the Western Democracies today, a party system with money power pulling the strings. The sheeple are dupes connected into the matrix.) Gold was soon to become the basis of loans, ten times the size of the amount deposited. In other words, 100 pounds in gold would be legal security for 1,000 pounds of loan; at 3% therefore 100 pounds in gold could earn 30 pounds interest annually with no more trouble to the lender than the keeping of a few ledger entries. The owner of 100 pounds of land, however, still must work every hour of daylight in order to make perhaps 4%. The end of the process must only be a matter of time. The moneylenders must become millionaires; those who own and work the land, the Englishman and the Scotsman, must be ruined. The process has continued inexorably till now, when it is nearly completed. It has been hypocritically camouflaged by clever propaganda as helping the poor by mulcting the rich. It has been in reality nothing of the kind. It has been in the main the deliberate ruination of the landed classes, the leaders among the Gentiles, and their supplanting by the Jew financiers and their hangers-on.
The British had not got very far with their nautical empire until Cromwell instituted the first Navigation Act of 1651. The erecting of massive import/export tariffs coincided with the invitation for some of the Amsterdam Jews to settle in London in order to help the British gain ascendancy over the Spanish traders. All would go well although smuggling would rapidly approach an industrial level.
Why does it always come down to the Jews being at fault? lol, its like nobody else in the world ever had a brain that could dominate finance.
Anyway, Please take into account that many invaded countries were attacked not directly by British armed forces but Pirates, Corsairs and Filibusters (irregulars serving under British crown)
Bunk.
For example, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria have NEVER been invaded by Britain.