This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Is Martial Law Justified If ISIS Attacks?
Submitted by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,
A group of foreign militants infiltrates the U.S. using student visas, weak borders, bribery and cooperation with drug cartels.
Secret cells integrate within metropolitan areas and blend with the populace. At the precise moment, they activate, unleashing small attacks across the country in coordinated blitzkrieg-style terror campaigns against everything from suburban neighborhoods to public schools to shopping malls, striking fear into the citizenry, which now believes no one is safe, even in the heartland.
With normal law enforcement overwhelmed, the economy on the brink and the populace ready to riot, the military is deployed domestically; curfews, price controls and rationing are initiated; and special operations agents act as infiltrators in order to subdue the terrorist factions.
The loss of common liberties is welcomed by most as safety and security become the paramount motivator.
A glimpse into the future? Well, perhaps. Actually, it’s the plot narrative to a Chuck Norris movie called “Invasion U.S.A.” The terrorists in that movie were communists from places like Cuba and Venezuela (hey, it was the 80s, and we had no idea that the communists were elitists that had already taken over from within), but the premise is strangely not far from what the government is trying to sell to us as a potential real-life scenario today.
As Americans, we have been bombarded with propaganda for decades, which conjures rationalizations for domestic military operations. This propaganda always presents us with an all-or-nothing option: relinquish liberty and beat the enemy, or “cling” to the “outdated” Constitution and fall as a society. There never seems to be a third option, an option that does not require the loss of freedoms and allows for security. In the film “Invasion U.S.A.,” I suppose we had Chuck Norris as a third option, which is not a bad third option in the world of cinema; but I’m sorry to say that Chuck alone cannot save us from what is coming in the real America.
I am highly suspicious of the rhetoric coming out of Washington lately in terms of the ISIS situation. ISIS has apparently secured the Iraqi city of Ramadi and put the government there on the defensive, meaning that despite the recent claims that ISIS leadership has been hit in Syria, the group continues to advance.
Rumors of potential ISIS attacks on U.S. soil continue to spread from sources like the FBI and the Transportation Security Administration.
“Former” CIA officials (is there such a thing?) are also getting in on the action, warning in mainstream media outlets that ISIS has the ability to direct at least small-scale attacks on the U.S. today.
However, the threat of ISIS does not frighten me. It concerns me, but what truly disturbs me is the likely government response if such predictions by alphabet agencies come to pass.
In my recent article “When The Elites Wage War On America, This Is How They Will Do It,” I examined the tactics behind not only globalization, but also the most probable methods that will be used to secure globalization through the oppression of dissenting voices and groups. Part of that examination included my take on the Jade Helm 15 exercises running from summer into autumn and how they fit directly into the strategies for disrupting insurgencies (revolutions) discussed openly by internationalists in their own symposiums.
My conclusion given the clear evidence at hand? Jade Helm is definitely NOT meant to prepare troops for foreign operations. The program is admitted to be a primer for military response to “crisis scenarios,” denoting domestic operation. Special forces groups are training with domestic agencies like the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration. And they are training and infiltrating completely American environments, which they would not be doing unless they planned to operate in very similar environments. Special forces always train like they fight. Period.
With at least 45% of Americans concerned that open domestic military exercises are a precursor to greater federal control over states and more than 62% convinced that government power is suffocating individual liberty, it is only a matter of time before the government spin doctors create a semi-believable rationale for such endeavors as Jade Helm. I believe that ISIS could be their perfect rationale.
As public concern is amplified and evidence indicating that the Department of Defense is lying about the purpose of JH15 is more widely recognized, the DOD may very well admit that the operation is not for training in foreign theaters. Rather, they may argue that JH15 is in fact training designed to protect Americans on American soil from widespread terrorist threats. That is to say, the new spin will be that Jade Helm is meant to save us all from the psychopathic child killing cannibal monstrosity known as ISIS.
Look at it this way, what better excuse for covert military actions in domestic environments? What better way to justify lying to the American people about Jade Helm goals and directives? What better way to silence the critics and so-called “conspiracy theorists” than for the government to say: “Yes, we lied, but it was to keep the real and honorable purpose of JH15 secret, and to save the public from terrorism, now shut up naysayers and liberty activists, you are putting the whole nation at risk…!”
Maybe I am connecting dots that are not dots, but it seems to me that the timing of ISIS warnings, the re-ignition of economic downturn in 2014/2015, the global shift away from the dollar, and Jade Helm are not entirely coincidental. Martial Law is not a scenario that can be generated in a vacuum; it needs a primer, a trigger event, if not multiple trigger events.
If the final trigger event is indeed intended to be a terror campaign on U.S. soil, then questions of the true purpose of Jade Helm will undoubtedly take a back seat to immediate solutions to what amounts to a foreign invasion (at least, that is how it will be painted), and none other than Jade Helm will be presented as that solution.
The debate over JH15 and programs like it will change. It will become a matter of the “greater good” against a foreign enemy, rather than a government overstep against the rights of the people. How can we possibly question the defense of American soil against terrorists? Isn’t that an undeniable directive of the military? And if we do question such a directive and its value to the American people, are we not “weakening” the resolve and effectiveness of the defense apparatus through negative public opinion? And by extension, would that not make us “domestic enemies” as well?
In fact, I can easily argue that there is absolutely NO rationale for domestic military operations against ISIS or anyone else, and here’s why.
ISIS Is A Fabrication
As I outlined in detail in my article “The Time Is Ripe For A False Flag Attack On American Soil,” the organization known as ISIS has long been a collaborative creation of the U.S. government and its allies. From funding and training in Libya and Jordan, to arming in Syria and Iraq, ISIS is nothing without the Western intelligence apparatus, just as al-Qaida was nothing more than a CIA Frankenstein monster.
So should Americans be forced to relinquish their freedoms in order to combat an enemy that our own government engineered out of thin air? And beyond that, who represents the greater enemy: ISIS or the lunatic elitists who gave ISIS the tools to commit atrocities?
Government Is Incapable Of Providing Security
Some people may argue that the true origins of ISIS are a matter of historical debate that will not solve our immediate problem of rampant terror threats. How can we nitpick where ISIS came from while ISIS is trying to massacre us? Fair enough.
My rebuttal would be that regardless of where ISIS found its organizational support, the U.S. government and the military apparatus under the direction of a corrupt DOD are incapable of protecting the American people anyway. If ISIS is able to unleash a campaign of attacks that give license to the idea of martial law, then the government has only proven one of two things:
1) It is too inept to prevent such events from occurring due to its refusal to secure our borders and despite full-spectrum surveillance of the American people by the NSA.
2) It is so evil in its machinations that it has allowed terrorist infiltration in order to further an agenda of greater control.
Either the government is a bungling bureaucratic mess not capable of keeping anyone safe, or it is a cesspool of tyranny that has no intention of keeping anyone safe. In either case, why should the American people give such an entity even MORE power, when it can’t responsibly handle the considerable power it already has?
American Civilians Can Provide Their Own Security And Do It Better
Official martial law may never be declared, but it could nevertheless become a reality. I would present the response to the Boston bombing event as a direct example of militarization of a domestic region without it being called “martial law.” This was, of course, a “federalized” response, rather than a military one. But it was militarization in its nature all the same. The establishment will use all kinds of mislabeling and spin in order to entice the populace to submit to further encroachment of liberties in the name of security.
The fact is the best defense for the civilian population of America has always been the individual population itself. Terrorists are far more likely to be thwarted tactically and psychologically by a trained, armed, aware and free citizenry than any oppressive federal or military dragnet. Why? Because the citizenry is the target, and thus, always first on the scene to respond. Citizens become victims when they wait around passively for government "authorized" responders to save them, instead of adopting the attitude that THEY are responsible for their own defense. Legally, it is a constitutional mandate that American militias retain authority over domestic defense. And to be clear, the militia is every able-bodied American, not only a certain percentage of Americans the government deems acceptable (which means the National Guard does not qualify as the militia).
This is the answer to the propaganda of militarization. We do not have to choose between liberty and security. We can have both, and we can provide it for ourselves as our own protectors. Sheepdogs be damned. Each citizen is his first and best line of defense.
Only when the American people take on the philosophy of self-defense rather than government reliance will we be free of fear from terrorism and free of fear from tyrannical government. It starts with each of you, in your homes, neighborhoods, towns and counties. Citizen organizations for mutual aid and security to counter any threat, regardless of the mask it wears, will be the catalyst for a legitimately free society. In the face of such organization, martial law is not only illegitimate, but entirely unnecessary. ISIS does not matter. It is what we ultimately do about ISIS or similar threats that matters, and martial law is not the answer.
- 17131 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


Martial law was apparently justified for deciding not to bail-out failed financial institutions. An attack would be a statist wanting martial law's wet dream.
We already had the attack...called 911.
Imagine if we had had a draft where we would be right now.
As it stands the American People are just an entertainment division of a bunch of psychotic wackos "masquerading as a war effort."
HOWEVER...
In the wisdom of our predecessors (meaning the Nuremberg Generation) this contingency was planned for and administered under the Truman Administration.
"For those that wish to shred the Constitution they get Allah."
And so it has come to pass.
Citizen Soldier? You have done your duty and may return to your farms.
Their "printing burden" is on them.
These Cities and other places exploding in violence is not a surprise.
Nor is it the fault or responsibility of the citizen soldier and his brethren the yeomanry.
Should these facts be inconsistent with the establishment of a tryanical order then I guess we all will have to start praying to Allah...
The purpose of sheepdogs is to herd sheep so they can be fleeced or eaten by the shephard instead of by wolves.
Still sucks for the sheep.
Indeed, and the people providing the sheepdogs are producing the following:
It started with the former and due to said bungling will just give up and end with the latter.
Is it okay to give a jaw smashing response if the US attacks?
Hmmm?
https://aadivaahan.wordpress.com/2015/01/23/till-the-end-if-you-have-the...
Martial law is the imposition of the highest-ranking military officer as the military governor or as the head of the government, thus removing all power from the previous executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.
There's two rather interesting issues that come up:
1. Obama is not going to appoint Gen. Dempsey or any other military leader as the supreme authority in the country. Obama - like his immediate predecessors - fully intend to remain in power during an emergency and ONLY enact martial-law style controls over the country at their whim. Their intent is to command the Armed Forces to maintain security and enforce federal laws, not to cede power and authority (even temporarily) to military leaders as is traditionally meant by the term martial law. The emergency powers' executive orders do not impose martial law on the United States - they only impose military enforcement under federal civilian leaders' authority. Those actions are meant to protect the federal government's authority, not protect YOU. Think about that for a second.
2. There are times when it's appropriate for the federal government to step in when a state is, say, devastated by a natural disaster and the state government is no longer functional. Consent for the U.S. government to take control of state functions is implied for humanitarian reasons. But what if there was a situation - natural disaster or scary bearded terrorists - where the state government was not only functional but felt they were fully capable of handling the situation. They would like assistance, but they will run things in their own state. But then the federal government disagreed or thought they could do a better job, so they just showed up anyway and took control of the state (or parts of it) without the state's consent.
Is that legal and/or constitutional? It's debateable, which is exactly why Obama has signed dozens of Executive Orders making it seem legal. Likewise, his (and Bush's) unending quest to create an interior-ministry style national police, aka Stazi or DHS, blurs the concept of ANY actual independent state authority. Almost like state governments' authority is merely a privilege (not a right) allowed by the federal government - until they change their minds. See how that's incompatible with the idea of a constitutional republic where states grant the federal government limited authority and the legitimacy of the federal government comes from the people through the states?
All this is just interesting in an academic way, though. The constitution has already been usurped to protect the oligarchs in charge. The federal government is not an extension of the member states - it's something foreign and independent of the states and needs its own armed forces to maintain that authority domestically. We can bitch about semantics as much as we want, but it's already been decided.
Everyone is a constitutional lawyer with their own fascinating opinions... all the way to the ovens.
We have been under a 'state of emergency' depending on one's interpretation of the CFR either since
1) The Civil War
or
2) 1933
Who needs anything new?
Actually, the smart thing would be to augment our LEAs with local Neighborhood Watch patrols, via the "Well regulated Militia" that the famous "Piece of paper", aka Constitution refers to.
It's not as though we lack people with Concealed Weapons Licenses (CWL).
I don't recall the constitution requiring conceal carry permits... Did I overlook a section?
Its in between the separation of church and state clause and the right to an abortion amendment.......no wonder you didnt see it.
Good and plenty clause.
when and if martial law ever comes-ISIS or some other
creation-will only be the excuse.
ISIS is the current CIA/Mossad sponsored boogey man.
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
Definitely they should declare Marshall law in Washington D.C. and stop them from attacking the US.
Until We the People declare martial law in Washington, D.C., they will do whatever they want. But I would hate to suggest something that may be deemed "collectivist."
I find it amazing that so many here on ZH don't realize that being divided and conquered involves division. Perhaps that's why ZH did away with the math problem previously required for posting.
Collectively deciding to take defensive action is one thing - voluntary. The political solutions you seem to prefer would seem to require a whole lotta forced involuntary stuff.
So I'm against syping on Americans, forcing Americans to pay taxes to fund foreign military adventures, forcing Americans to go to prison because they decide to do drugs, forcing Americans to give trillions to bankers, but because I want publicly funded roads and schools I'm worthy of disdain. How about we agree on the first set of things, get a government that agrees with us, and then debate the other details. Or we can just have a knee jerk reaction to anything that isn't ideologically pure and live in a cesspool of corruption that feeds off our division.
"...get a government that agrees with us..."
Rand - don't Bogart that joint, pass it over here. A government that agrees with us? Do you not understand the nature of government?
Every king in history would applaud your disdain of elected government.
@Rand - You must be a supporter of social contract theory. What social contract theory did was replace the “divine right of kings” with the “divine right of gangs”. The majority has absolute control over the minority using a faux legal entity called government. Democracy, whether it be direct or representative is tyrannical in nature. it allows someone like you to visit a voting booth and appoint a legal and political leader over me against my will. And what gives you the right to do that? It is not just a violent act but cowardly. You [probably] won't rob me personally but you damned well will by proxy to build your public roads and schools.
Explain your super duper idea Socrates.
Good comments Rand, but I disdain the fact that my vote is meaningless. ;-)
I find it rather distasteful that rs implies that the US was intended to be a 'democracy'. History is on your side, rs. The libtards have been forcing us toward a democracy for at least 50 years. Ben Franklin announced that they had created 'a Republic, if you can keep it.' Apparently we couldn't.
"The war's over, men. Wormer dropped the big one"... There just wasn't en expulsion order with this one so few of you fuckers noticed.
bring that weak shit, isis. i'm tired of shooting at paper targets. and i bet several million of my fellow nra members are too.
If you think isis is the real enemy, I'm starting to see why the NRA has its doubters.
my comments don't necessarily name isis as the only targets. so release your spincter rand the scary parts over.
It's not a matter of justified, it's de plan boss!
What, the NSA doesn't know where these "government created terrorist's" are at? ISIS is the new "boogeyman" for the citizens of the baa baa to be afraid of and want their government to protect them.
What a bunch of bullshit! The government has brought ISIS here so they can declare martial law whenever they desire to.
Thanks Silly, the only comment that needed to be posterd here.
Whether these are false flags or the real thing, it doesn't matter. We already have mass shootings and bombings. The odds of anyone dying from what these fools can do are one in hundreds of millions. People need to get some perspective.
isis A
as in mossad,mi6 and cia A.
isis A as in frank kitson pseudo gang concept A
isis A as in tavistock psycho warfare black op A.
netanyahoo today sharon yesterday same old false flag shite
rabbi myths and the casting of hollywood spells
America Under Israeli Occupation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB9_EgiylOk
it is a tradition to blame jews...always
Is that because 'Jews' are never to blame and scapegoated, or often to blame, and their guilt obfuscated?
What's your evidence, either way?
What utmost bullshit. Like these illiterate goat fuckers are going to come pouring over the borders.
We've ushered in the Trojan Horses by the millions.
I wonder what Rahm Emmanuel's opinion on this would be.
Same as always: "What's in it for me? What's in it for my People?"
You should also start thinking that way, given that your choices are Sheep, Shepherd or Wolf.
I was thinking more along the lines of "Never let a crisis go to waste." :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines
"Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."
If ISIS attacks America, the NSA and FBI failed to protect you.
The question becomes, are you going to allow failures to order you around?
IMO, they already have failed us.
If ISIS infiltrates the USA at all then the FBI and NSA have failed completely in their sole purpose for existing.
If ISIS infiltrates the USA with help from the drug cartels then it is an attack on the US populace by the CIA, since no drug cartel ships to the US withough CIA blessing (or help).
Martial Law is unconstitutional .... LOL:)) I know,,, we are 'post' that GD piece of paper.
Still, Martial Law, Emergency Powers etc, are not even mentioned in the Constitution. Brandon is correct about the state militias being the founders primary force to protect the country and constitution but that said, the states are almost as bad as the Federales. Add that most 'citizens' would cry in agony if they were forced to serve and,,, that the states have no recent experience running what is basically a military. They are pitifully dependent on big brother to care and feed them like most citizens.
My favorite author, Edwin Vieira has several books on the subject and a couple of videos. This man has forgotten more about the constitution than most of us would ever know.If your interested in how it should work,,, he's your goto man.
http://constitutionalmilitia.org/
Bottom line,,, the fact that it's unconstitutional will definitely not stop the terrorists in DC. They are passing a treaty (the TPP) that does not stand the constitutional test, same for all the other free trade treaties, the Federal Reserve, the patriot act, the NDAA, Jade Helm, and just about 90 percent of whatever they dream up.
Firing up the militias is a non starter as most citizens would actually consider them traitors to the Federal Government and I don't think the states have the balls to take back their militias and sovereignty that were stolen from them in the early 1900's by the Feds.
As much as I hate to say it, nothing will stop the DC traitors, their courts and unlawful DHS. Spotty resistance will pop up but like right now there will be little organization. Maybe after many years, but not at first.
IMO the only thing that could save the country would be for the military to stand down. I mean the men and women that serve, not their traitorous staff in DC. They take an oath to the constitution, not the government. If they could be persuaded they are not traitors for refusing unconstitutional orders then we stand a chance... otherwise, it's curtains, not only for the country but for many lives and much blood that will unquestionably be the order of the day.
>>>IMO the only thing that could save the country would be for the military to stand down.
To paraphrase the Great Helmsman, it always comes down to the military and police.
Back when I lived in the USA, I made it a point to have some LEO friends. You should too.
ISIS, then it was Al Qaeda, then it was Bloods and Crips, then it was the Sandanistas, then it was the drug cartels, then it was the communists, then it was Pol Pot, then it was the Vietnamese, then it was the Black Panthers, then it was the commies again, then it was the Cubans, then it was the Mau Mau, then it was motorcycle gangs, then it was drug addicts, then it was the Nazis, then it was the Japanese, then it was the Italians (the Italians?), then the commies again again, etc. again again etc, always someone, something to be afraid of. Wish the commies were back. We seemed to have many more civil liberties and other freedoms waaaaaaayyyyyyy back then and when.
Don't forget the filthy Irish!
I think deportation of muslims will prevent ISIS attack
ISIS:
Israeli Secret Intelligence Service
Wallstreet can continue to ramp up the market. At the end of day, we will expose those responsible in creating terrorism to build a new foundation of GDP growth forecast.
Your day's are outnumbered. Be aware of the consequences. It's that simple without the need of DHS or NSA. The stupid fucks getting paid will expose the entity of fraud. Coming to a theater near you.
ISIS is a CIA/Mossad/Saudi affair - that they had state backing was obvious even if you aren't a former intel officer, avid peruser of the deep web, or have above a 100 IQ.
That the vids were filtered through SITE was a bold move...trusting in msm control and the stupidity of the average person and so far - I have to admit I gave the Yankee public too much credit.
SITE Intelligence Group - WikispooksThe coming spook civil war ought to be interesting.
And sooner or later chaos will escape into Israel itself.
No.
ISIS and Putin aren't the real problem it's Wall Street.
In the UK Gordon Brown made contingency plans to put troops on the streets in 2008 if the financial system collapsed.
When people lose all their savings and ATMs, debit and credit cards stop working, chaos will ensue very quickly.
With the next financial crisis approaching, that will probably blow out of Wall Street like last time, Marshall Law could be the only solution.
All governments of/by/for the people turn into ... Govts for/by the elite, TPTB.
A country or a nation needs boundaries because there is always a perceived threat from the outside.
A line from Oliver Stone's JFK: "A state's power over its people resides in its war powers."
This has been the case ever since The Federal Reserve was created in 1913.
I$I$ like its slut mother Al CIAduh....as Judo Mercan as the rest of our apple pie...hubri$!
Onward with our Jaded Helmets as all our lost Judaic wars come home to feed on US, finally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LSIwvE0Nvo
Of course, not! The government will make the choice for you.
Not if we don't let them.
We don't need no stinking martial law.
They might take over Hidalgo county or some hick town someplace, but this is a big fookin country.
Lots of folks here wouldn't take kindly to foreign hooligans shooting guns and driving around like they own the place. I'm afraid their fun will end very badly for them. We'll set up barricades around blind curves, physical roadblocks. Our finest shots will have a commanding view.
Veterans, hunters, competitive shooters.
Top men.
They have to gas up some place. There we'll be.
It'll all be very entertaining until someone gets an eye put out.
lolz
Truer words were never spoken.
It's all fun and games for now. The large crowds at my local shooting ranges are not there to improve their duck hunting talents. They are largely there to practice insurgent-style shooting and combat-style shooting on their own dime and they are highly motivated and highly pissed off as it is.
Since ISIS is a CIA created mercenary army, the answer is no. Just de-fund the CIA and arrest their leaders for drug trafficking.
What would the CIA have to gain from backing ISIS? If anything, they are backing Al-Nusra, as a lesser of two evils.
You want to know who has a VESTED interest in ISIS creating havoc in Syria and Iraq? Iran..
If they want to get the Arab Shi'a of Iraq and most of the Persian Gulf to seek the protection of the Iranian Persian Shi'a, then there must be an enemy so powerful and sinister that the Arab Shi'a have no choice but to invite the "vampire into the house"..
Iran's Ayatollahs have the very same goals as ISIS.. namely restoration of the Caliphate UNDER SHI'A PERSIAN RULE..
But there are a lot of nasty Arabs in the way, and contolling a lot of energy resources.
Arabs and Persians don't mix well. They don't like each other and the only thing that unites them in common cause is Shi'ism. But the holiest sites in Shi'ism lie in Iraq, not Iran. And contol over those holy sites are requisite for the Iranians to proclaim that they are the religious authorities in Shi'ism. They must control Samarra in order to "stir" the sleeping 12th Imam, who they believe is the Mahdi, to pave the way for Isa (Jesus) to return and create the Shi'a Utopia..
The Iranians support the Shi'a Arabs as pawns. But they are more than wiilling to sacrifice those pawns against Sunnia Arabs in order to create the conditions that will permit them to bring their "Queen" and "Bishops" into play (Persians invented Chess, btw).. So they are more than content (but silent) as Arabs kill one another. The more Arabs that die, the better.. Then the Persians can sweep in..
Of course, then the "wild card" will be the Turks, who also hate the Persians. (read your history books).. They are unlikely to just sit back and let the Iranians have carte blanche in the region. But Iran will contol Iraq's oil.. and maybe even Saudi Arabia's and Kuwaits, since both have very large Shi'a Arab populations.
The ultiimate agenda for the Iranians, is the recapture of Al Quds (Jerusalem), which also happens to be the official title of their "elite" special forces and intelligence services.. (The Quds Force).. And the only path to Jerusalem is through a sea of Arab blood..
Now.. you were saying something about the CIA being behind all of this? Maybe you need to take up Chess..
Scrutinizer
If ISIS attacks you better ask Jihad McCain oops John why his naughty boys are playing up.
Here is a nice album of 'Jihad' with all his ISIS mates.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=john+mccain+posing+with+isis&tbm=isch&...
Start asking the voters who keep on voting this bit of human crap back into the US Senate time and time again.
To cause terror, bloodshed, destruction and misery aacross the globe.
About time America got a bit in blow back.
I'd welcome real martial law (meaning the military arrests the traitor in chief and congress en masse).
Genuine Martial Law can only be declared by the military when the civilian government is arrested, blown up, fled to Argentina, etc.
Anything else is not really Martial Law.
More disinfo bullshit on zh.
ISIS is a psychological operation, there is no army, there are no terrorists, its all a phoney fake show with fake beheadings fake immolations, fake training camps fake fucking everything.
It is not something that cia mossad etc created that got out of hand, IT IS the cia and mossad etc.
If you want isis to go away defund the government that is telling you it exists.
I cant believe after this long so many people still swallow up this fucking crap.
Duplicate
I can see you're preparing for a extended Adventure Vacation in Anbar and Palmyra soon.. Just to prove to us how "fake" ISIS is.. Please keep us updated, ok?
And while you're there, why don't you ask the Kurds and Yazidis how "fake" ISIS is..
There have been a lot of mistakes, and misunderstandings, on the part of US leaders regarding ISIS, Al Qaida, as well as Hamas.. And we continue to misunderstand the agenda and intentions of the radical Ayatollahs in Iran..
The ME is a shit-hole full of historical ethnic, tribal, and religious rivalries and strife. Previously, the Brits and French did a fair job of keeping a lid on it via authoritarian regimes. Then the US stepped into the quagmire and thought we could keep it together.. But our post-invasion policies were misguided, naive, if not blatantly negligent.
ISIS is very real. And they are doing what Al Qaida only hoped to accomplish in a distant future... restoration of the Islamic Caliphate.
The best we can hope to do is contain the threat.. But that region, IMO, is on the verge of all out war between Iran, the Arabs, and the Turks. Each of them (With current Turkish leadership) seem to believe they are the ones who are destined to restore the Caliphate.
Ultimately, Iran and Turkey will face off against one another. But a lot of Sunni and Shi'a Arab blood will be spilt before then..
We missed our opportunity to convince the Sunnis, Shi'a, and Kurdish Iraqis to unite for mutual economic benefit. It was a long shot in the first place, but we did nothing to ensure that all ethnic groups shared in the oil wealth of Iraq equally.
I fear it's too late for Iraq, as well as Syria. Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, may be next, and Jordan will be threatened as well. But in the case of the latter, I have little doubt that the Israelis will step in to play a role..
Scrutinizer
NO!
True Blooded Americans can take care of ourselves. Against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Congress you paying attention?
How about we don’t do anything except liberalize open carry. There are enough conceal carry permits in Florida to make us safe against any couple of fools who want to shoot up a mall. My only concern is my mouse gun is too small to deal with guys outfitted like the two ISIS wannabes in Texas.
I know the argument is going to be presented that open carry people can be mugged for their guns. My counter point is I don’t see many cops getting mugged for theirs.
I know we are arguing that this will be the wild wild west. The truth is the west was pretty quiet unless you were a cattle thief or an Indian.
Better headline:
"Nuke Israel when Israel Secret Intelligence Service Attacks America"
Gee, what a great time to turn our guns in! Prices have come down, I came home with a like new AK for $525 yesterday. It's bad ass.
ISIS vs. USrael
A plague on both your shithouses.
OMG a post from Brandon Smith that is short, to the point and I actually agree with a majority of it.
"ISIS Is A Fabrication"
It is so obviously a fabrication that I'm scared of the people fall for it.
ISIS members orient themselves according to best camera angle when they do their daily prayers. Facing the Ka'bah is far less important.
Congress, the Whore House, and the Zionist led Military Industrial Complex control Internet discourses, the WEB, domestic police, National Guard, all media outlets, and talking heads, and allied nations. The American people are trapped in an Internationalist vacuum, a domestic vacuum, and a vacuum of personal agency. In brief, Americans have been neutered on all political fronts and Jade Helm 15 is a political move to intimidate all Americans into total submission to an armed military takeover and a full fledged totalitarian police state. By October 2015 the jackbooted thug brownshirt American Patriots will be driving MRAPS through your neighbourhoods and barking orders to you through loudspeakers attached to their MRAPS. GI Joe and the MRAPS(tm) will tell you to submit to the BORG because resistance is futile. And a majority of Americans will buy the rhetoric lock, stock, and barrel, SUCKERS!
The War OF Terror is a racket perpetrated on the American people and the rest of the world.
We fund, arm, and train these guys, along with our so called allies...
Sick them onto the world....
Then if there is any blowback, we use that as an excuse to invade someone, borrow and spend trillions within the Military Industrial complex, and take away our liberties and freedoms.
ISIS only exists because we didn't clamp down on what created Al-Qeada. How do you define a loss of the War OF Terror? Simple, that ISIS exists at all.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Going after Bin Laden by invading Iraq and Afghan is like having a universal manhunt and invading Indonesia and India to go after the Captain who led the Pearl Harbor attack against us...
We need to go after the higher ups who actually create the conditions for terrorism, the people who fund them, the people who train them, and the banks that all that money flows through. London/Riyadh.
For every Osama Bin Laden, for every Pablo Escobar...there is a London/Wall Street/Other banker who is transfering all that money around and without which, these guys wouldn't be able to do shit.
It's all a racket, and London/Riyadh/Washington/etc are losing control. Demand the release of the 28 pages.
Read: Crossing The Line by John Rambo
No.
Besides John McInsane said these are "Good people"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vItuKKuz_7Y