What Do Falling Corporate Profits Mean With Stocks Near Their Highs?

Tyler Durden's picture

Via Dana Lyons' Tumblr,

If you’ve followed our commentary for awhile, you may have noticed that we don’t cover fundamental or economic data too often. That is for a good reason: we don’t use it, at all. Occasionally, however, a data point will cross the radar that piques our interest for whatever reason. So it is with the current state of U.S. Corporate Profits. The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis released the latest data today revealing that Corporate Profits (after Tax with Inventory Valuation Adjustment and Capital Consumption Adjustment) were down 9% for the 1st quarter and are now down 16% from their peak in the 3rd quarter of 2013.

Perhaps we don’t run in the right circles but we haven’t heard much regarding the significance of this trend on the stock market, which continues to trade near its all-time highs. Perhaps that’s a good thing considering we’ve found scant profitable uses for fundamental data in our investment approach (which is why we don’t use it). So we decided to take a look at it ourselves to see what effect similar historical precedents, assuming there were any, may have had on the stock market. This is what we looked for:

  1. Quarters when Corporate Profits were down at least 12% from their 2-year high, and
  2. the S&P 500 made a 2-year high at some point within the same quarter.

As it turns out, there have been 21 quarters meeting that criteria since 1960.

 

Many of the occurrences came in clusters in 1980, 1986-1987 and 1998-2000. There were also single occurrences in 1961, 2007, 2011 and the 1st quarter of last year. Without going into great depth of analysis, one can tell by the inauspicious dates that these circumstances have not worked out well in the past. The stock market may not have rolled over immediately in every occasion (e.g., 1986, 1998, 2014), but it usually ended up paying the piper.

Specifically, the average drawdown over the 2 years following these quarters was -18.6%. This compares with an average 2-year drawdown of -7.3% following all quarters since 1960.

We don’t follow economic and fundamental data too often since we’ve never found it very helpful in our investment decision-making process. At times, however, a certain data series will garner our attention. Often times, as is the case with Corporate Profits presently, it grabs our attention because it is receiving very little attention elsewhere. From just a cursory look at the current trend of falling Corporate Profits, however, it would appear to be a potential negative influence on the stock market that is trading near its all-time highs – if not immediately, then eventually.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
wendigo's picture
wendigo (not verified) May 30, 2015 2:38 PM

I don't think there will ever be a stock market crash. They'll keep pushing it higher. We may be fighting in the streets over a can of Spam, but the computers will still send stocks ever upward. 

CH1's picture

What does it mean?

That the Fed will buy more shares, of course!

The King's picture
The King (not verified) wendigo May 30, 2015 9:13 PM

I'm making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do... www.jobs-review.com

Magooo's picture

I present to you -- the disease (the financial crisis is a symptom)

 

 

THE PERFECT STORM (see p. 59 onwards)

The economy is a surplus energy equation, not a monetary one, and growth in output (and in the global population) since the Industrial Revolution has resulted from the harnessing of ever-greater quantities of energy.  

 

But the critical relationship between energy production and the energy cost of extraction is now deteriorating so rapidly that the economy as we have known it for more than two centuries is beginning to unravel.  

 

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/files/2013/01/Perfect-Storm-LR.pdf

In.Sip.ient's picture

Well, with ZIRP you also get zero capital accumulation.

 

And that does affect your cronies as well as their competitors

on Main St.  that you've done such a great job screwing.

 

No capital accumulation, no investment, no jobs, and no profits.

 

Pretty straight forward really.  Its just taken 8 years to become

obvious to the "select few" on WS.

 

Everyone else has been feeling it for a while.

 

Nutflush60's picture

I bet that chart would be more ominous if you elimated Apple from the calculation.

Youri Carma's picture

If you’ve followed 'PrisonPlanet Forum - Financial Crisis Forum' for a while, you may have noticed that we don’t cover stock market economic data at all. That is for a good reason: we don’t use it. http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=198.0

who cares's picture

That makes me thinking of Zimbabue and Venezuela.

napples's picture

"What Do Falling Corporate Profits Mean With Stocks Near Their Highs?"
The 8th dirty word they cannot say on prime-time news: stagflation. Perhaps this 'Bull' market should be abbreviated to simply 'BS'.

tunetopper's picture

Dark Pools
+ Custody Banks
+ Federal Reserve
+ Corporate Stock Buybacks
+ Index Buyers (ETFs and tracking funds with indexing mandated)

=
Distorted Market