This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Evolution Of "Man"
»
- 19444 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
So this is how it ends.
... Not with a bang but a wimp-er.
and Family Guy called it back in 2009;
http://happyplace.someecards.com/family-guy/family-guy-makes-a-caitlyn-j...
This is taught in every government "school." Government schools are no longer primarily about education - reading writing, and arithmetic. Voting the "proper" way, how to be dependent on your benevolent government, and whatever one gets off with is what one should marry is now "education." Certainly can't teach math or the kiddies would revolt.
Looks to me like we are at about this stage now..
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/05/11/15/288C63D700000578-0-image-a-136_1431354994878.jpg
Who the fuck cares? Religious thumping biggots? Insecure men? In a true Libertarian society no one gives a shit.
Huh. Bruce Jenner? If he was serious about creating a stir, he woulda thrown on a burka and done some big FaceTime reveal to the NYC jumbo-tron from the middle of Syria and have Kimmie K record the homies tossing rocks.
Only in America.....puking.
in the u.s. females graduate from college 50% more than males.
http://fortune.com/2013/03/27/boys-vs-girls-whats-behind-the-college-gra...
Juggernaut I 100% agree, ultimately it doesn't matter at all what people do to their own body.
It may however be marginally interesting to understand how TBTB use our money to glorify what is essentially a mental disorder and thus demoralize their ruled subjects in order to better dominate them. The goal is to deconstruct the three pillars of social identity, ie family, race, religion and sex so people don't know who they are and need to turn to others (ie TV, schools, institutions, etc.) to form their identity. Of course randian heroes, pure individualists, are not affected by such psychological warfare.
Btw has everyone seen the piece by John Hopkins' former head of psychiatry on transgenderism?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/06/03/wsj-promotes-op-ed-cl...
Public schools are government indoctrination centers, AKA brainwashing.
I am willing to bet a 1oz Gold Eagles uncirculated coin that this dude, f.k.a. Bruce Jenner will kill himself within 24 months.
Any takers? ;-)
Looney
It will take longer then that. But yeah.. One thing you will notice in Thailand is that there is a lot of ladyboys. Just no old ladyboys. They don't last past 40
Up to your old tricks again Spitzer?
har har
My wife said the same thing
I hear that Obama's husband is ready to come out of the closet and become Micheal again.
If you knew anything about naming conventions in different cultures, you would realize that Wookies never use the name Michael.
nar, he'll go 2 years and then when the media circus and $20million contracts are finished, he'll go 'oh i want to be a man again', reverse all the hormones and operations, and start the lucrative media circus again
thats why his 'courage' award is a total crock of shit. give it to a transsexual nobody in a conservative community with no media circus of liberal cheerleaders who has no-one on their side but they still have the courage to go through it. THATs a genuine form of courage
It ends with a a castration.
True. But man was castrated when he put that monkey suit and tie on.
har har har har har it's duh woman dat he turnt into, like caitlyn jenner har har har har
evolution of zh:
http://www.calamitynews.com/images/deevolution.gif
God made (wo)man, but he used Bruce Jenner to do it!
Shine on America
Something you want to tell us about yourself Cole? ;-)
It's what Nietzsche called Umwertung aller Werte (Transvaluation of values), elevating the weak over the strong, exalting that which is "ill-constituted and weak" at the expense of that which is full of life and vitality.
What was considered sinful/crazy/morally degenerate a few years ago is now virtuous/courageous/admirable
Funny how propaganda can do that, huh?
Take a look at the painting Metropolis (1928) of Weimar Germany by Otto Dix (not to be confused with the film of the same name and era) it shows the dystopia and sexual degeneracy of that time and place, back then men could only dress as women and were'nt undergoing voluntary surgical mutiation
https://www.artsy.net/artwork/otto-dix-grossstadt-metropolis
I wonder if that's where we're headed?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Hermaphroditus_%28her...
You so right, it's turning into an epidemic!
back then men could only dress as women and were'nt undergoing voluntary surgical mutiation
Actually they were, and for a rather long time before then as well.
They're coming for our dicks, James_Cole. Not just our freedoms or our guns or our gold, but our gaddamn dicks for chrissake!
I, for one, am going underground. No way are they getting my dick. From now on I'll be tucked, waiting for the blessed revolution to free all dicks.
Recall this song?
King Missile - Detachable Penis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYwiwbgMusY
More like a chemical castration but through the mind, indoctrination of not only white guilt, but white male guilt.
This reminds me of that strange argument often put forward by American Christians, that if you allow gay people out into the culture openly there will be this whole 'gay temptation' thing. Like, put a hetero christian guy into a room with a bunch of gay guys and suddenly he'll be overwhelmed with temptation and start fucking all of them. Somehow I've never felt this 'temptation' when around gay people, might have something to do with me being straight?
Caitlyn Jenner is not going to steal your dicks guys, relax.
Fact, she's got an extra for somebody.
sorry, James...sexuality isn't as black-and-white as you and many others think. And, yes, it can be influenced by social acceptance etc. As singer Brian Molko from the band "Placebo" says when asked if he is gay: "(sexuality) it's fluid". Bonobo chimps don't seem to have such firm boundaries on sexual behaviour: males use homosexual sex as a way of bonding or exerting dominance. Many men have gone into prison thinking they were 100% straight and have jumped the fence after a time of abstinence only to revert back to straightness once released. Social acceptance of homosexuality will lead many others to stop repressing their urges and give it a go.
The Ancient Romans thought homosexuality was OK. Many Roman military commanders even encouraged it as a way of maintaining morale during long absences from soldiers families. However, that sexual energy can be quite productive if its channelled into other things but if you're sitting around in a fort waiting around it's hard to find a better outlet.
sorry, James...sexuality isn't as black-and-white as you and many others think
I'm a millennial, I grew up on the internet and if there's one thing I've learned from it it would be that human sexuality is certainly not b/w. From what I can tell though people basically fall into three groups of varying grayness: mostly straight, mostly gay and (rare) bi.
Prison sex is obviously a special case so not much sense applying that scenario to broad society. My point was that I've grown up around gay people in sexually open society and never been attrated to a guy, let alone been 'tempted' by gay sex. Does that mean it could never happen? No. But the obsession some christian groups have with not allowing openness to gay people suggests a wee bit of projection.. Repression tends not to work as people would like it to.
Bruce Jenner Vanity Fair Image
where are his hands?????????????penis???????????????????
WHERE IS THE REST OF ME???????????????????????
This semiotic token is being implanted or selected by the group consciousness to manifest evident
CASTRATION ANXIETY
http://psychohistory.com/books/reagans-america/chapter-3-the-making-of-a...
Nietzche was talking about Christianity and pity preserving that which was ripe for destruction
True, but I was only talking about some people embracing the Transvaluation concept and not an exposition of Nietzche's philosophy
Transvaluation has not even a vague relevance to the topic above. People are only upvoting you because they don't know what it refers to (maybe a few ayn rand lovers as well).
and in the context of Neitsches class bias that resulted in the Superman ideology that hitler so disasterously misused, I'm not so sure of the merits of the argument
Im not dissing all neitsches work - nihilism is an irrefutable phenomenon - , just his ideas that are tainted by his class identity complex need a pinch of salt.
Nietzsche's obsession to shag his sister should be a key indicator to any reasonably sane observer as to how much stock should be placed in his views. Purely materialistic philosophies, like nihilism, are for stunted intellects or for rebellious adolescents. "Vee believez in nothing, Lebowski. Yaaaah!"
Estrogen mimmickers in the water/food, cultural promotion of metros over hetros, all by design. We are under attack in a declared war. The instigators of this war happily tell us they are indeed in a war against us. Most of the poor saps on the receiving end of this war are stuck in ignorance, blindness or fully engaged in Stockholm Syndrom.
Some are on to the game. You are either awake, awakening or fighting to stay asleep. Awareness makes people the enemy of the state.
Easy way to know which category you are in? Awake, Awakening or Asleep? Answer these and you will know
1) Was 9/11 an inside job?
2) Will changing politicians fix things?
If your answers are YES,NO then you are awake.
Any other combo puts you in the other two possible groups.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypJ3dP7qCpE
She's got that bitch look down pat.
That's what the world wants you believe. It's a lie.
This has been the reality in Muslim war zones for some time now as a means of letting the women cop the landmines instead of the husbands.
In war zones, there are usually a lot of courageous widows with nothing left to lose. Whether they live or die, they pay an ultimate sacrifice.
Caitlyn Jenner?
If you want to see how it is really likely to end up at this point, watch Idiocracy.
...a brilliant comedy that has turned out to be frighteningly prescient.
& to think 'OW My Balls', & 'Thirst Mutilator' were both kicked off of Zero Hedge for supposedly 'inappropriate' comments
STRIPES ~ Now that was a good movie.
Big toes, lighten up Francis, the acorn that becomes the mighty oak.
Now that's FUNNY!
Kid asks father where human beings came from and father gives the biblical account of Adam and Eve. The kid then goes and asks the mother who tells him of the Darwinian theory of evolution from ape like creatures.
The kid is confused and goes back to the father and tells him what the mother said and asks which version is correct.
The father clearing his throat replies, "both versions are correct but mum was talking about her side of the family".
So you have to choose "a lot of rights" or "good moral"
THe objective of male destruction applies only to Whites. Vibrants still flaunt their masculinity without shame or embarassment.
Man I thought it was legal to beat yo ho
The DEvolution of man. FIFY
Are we not men? We are DEVO!
The next model will be a mechanical hybrid.
The next model will have tails.
Slave revolt ahead.
For fuck's sake who cares
Those who wish to find common ground care. Its one thing to have a town fool, or a wise and crazy shamman its another to make that out as normal, reasonable and good.
Your compasion, tolorance and spirit, does you credit but can be made to serve evil.
No lie - today...
Asked to confrim I am not a Robot (have seen that one) and then this...
Gender
Male
Female
Other
WTF???
Recently saw a new "terms of service" agreement from my bank for the Bill Pay thingy. My bank is a podunk non-TBTF.
TOS mentions "will not use this service to purchase ammo, firearms, real property or anything else prohibited by the bank blablabla"
Declined. Visiting next week in person to find out wtf.
From an outie to an innie, thats evolution !!!
It certainly is a short cut...
See ? I made a funny.
Matt Walsh is a blogger, writer, speaker, and professional truth sayer.
t This
On Friday night, a mentally ill crossdresser named Bruce Jenner was interviewed for two hours during prime time about his plan to gruesomely mutilate his genitals in a macabre pseduo-medical ritual often erronsously described as a “sex change.” He detailed his decision to Diane Sawyer, calmly declaring: “For all intents and purposes, I am a woman.”
He concluded that the next best course of action is to castrate himself and live the rest of his life pretending to be a girl. He’s already undergone extensive cosmetic surgery, including shaving down his trachea (which is a thing that doctors will actually do, apparently) in pursuit of some perverse, bastardized notion of synthetic femininity.
In response, our depraved and insane country has hailed him as something approaching a god, with millions of people flooding social media to heap unrestrained praise and adulation.
Yes, in the unhinged mind of popular culture, a man puts on a pantsuit and suddenly he’s a brave, strong, courageous, amazing, historic, legendary, superhero warrior savior. He went from a D-list reality TV celebrity to Jesus Christ, and all because he said he wants to be a she.
This is demented. The whole thing. All of it.
It’s worth noting, too, that it doesn’t generally require “courage” or “bravery” or “strength” to do something that is sure to result in television deals and roaring applause from a sea of adoring fans. Usually, courage is not defined as “the willingness to endure immense popularity, esteem, fame, and profit.”
I’m not saying this was all a marketing ploy, but his bank account and reputation are certainly reaping the rewards.
So, heroic? Hardly. Amazing? This old man with cerebral palsy using a typewriter to paint the Mona Lisa is amazing, but Bruce Jenner? Sorry, I don’t see it.
I think the better word would be horrifying. And sad. And depressing. And despicable.
That last one isn’t to describe him, but to describe the simpering suck ups yelling for him to jump while he stands on the metaphorical ledge, threatening to hurt himself in ways he’ll never be able to undo. These people saluting Jenner for trying to become a woman are really no different than lunatics congratulating an emaciated anorexic for imagining she’s 300 pounds overweight. Both harbor harmful, destructive, and inaccurate perceptions about themselves, and both need help changing their perceptions, not their bodies.
Yet he will receive no such help because that would hurt the “transgender” agenda, and “transgenderism” is the new unholy grail of modern progressivism.
Liberals have already managed to legally redefine what constitutes a human being, and now they’ve set out to redefine what constitutes a man and a woman. As usual, they are having overwhelming success and meeting virtually no resistance along the way.
Every day, the media treats us to another breathless screed about how transgenders are finally “having their moment.” We are at the “transgender tipping point,” as Time put it. Transgender acceptance is “the civil rights issue of our time,” according to the vice president.
Want more from Matt Walsh?http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/themes/TheBlaze/images/icons/xl-share...) 0px 0px / 100% no-repeat;"> Follow Matt on Facebookhttp://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/themes/TheBlaze/images/icons/xl-share...) 0px -48px / 100% no-repeat;"> Follow Matt on Twitter
Kids are learning in school that boys can have girl brains and girls can have boy brains. Worst of all, children are now being labeled “transgendered” and traipsed around as props by gay activists if they decide to “identify” as the opposite gender when they’re still in pull ups. Evidently, when a 2-year-old boy says he’s a girl, we ought to take the pronouncement quite seriously.
My son is 2 and has for several months self-identified as a tyrannosaurus rex. Should I rewatch “Jurassic Park” to get ideas on how to raise an extinct reptile? Or should I assume he’s a small child and small children have active imaginations and a very tenuous grasp on reality? I think I prefer the second option, although the moment he sprouts into a five ton lizard and tries to eat my car, I’ll certainly reconsider.
But my son’s dinosaur pretensions are just a bit of harmless fun. “Transgenderism,” on the other hand, is a dangerous road to a dark place.
The former top psychiatrist at John’s Hopkins, Dr. Chapman, penned a Wall Street journal article several months ago, making it clear that “transgenders” are mentally disordered. Boldly affirming the indisputable findings of every credible biologist who’s ever existed, Dr. Chapman reported that sex change is biologically impossible, and to tell a transgender he can be “reassigned” or “transitioned” from one gender to the other is to “promote and collaborate with mental illness.”
As the doctor points out, “transgenders” have a suicide rate 20 times higher than the general population —after surgery. Naturally, we’re told the astronomically high rates of suicide, drug abuse, and depression among gender confused people can be blamed on “bullying,” but this is a convenient and dishonest assumption. The truth is, “transgenders” are plagued with a mental delusion that makes it difficult for them to accept reality, which may tempt them to permanently escape it. The best thing we can do is help them to accept the world for what it is and themselves for who they are. The worst thing we can do is play along with a fantasy that’s clearly causing them immense torment and pain.
It never occurs to these exceedingly “tolerant” do-gooders that transgenders are killing themselves, abusing drugs, and carving their bodies into pieces because they are unhappy. They are unhappy before surgery, and often even less happy afterwards. They are self-loathing. They are desperate. The last thing — the absolute last thing — they need is to be told they should embrace their mental illness and believe whatever lies it tells them about themselves.
Bruce Jenner has a male anatomy, male chromosomes, male DNA, male hormones, a male bone structure, and male reproductive organs. He is a male. He can never be anything but a male. He is not a woman “for all intents and purposes,” for the same reason that I am not an antelope or a pine cone for all intents and purposes. Indeed, it is specifically my “intents and purposes” that make me neither a pine cone nor an antelope and Jenner neither a woman nor “transgendered.”
He can grow out his hair and shop in the women’s section at Barneys, but none of that will have any impact on his practical physiological disposition. He can change his wardrobe, but that will not change his DNA. He can ask us to use different pronouns when addressing him, but that won’t cause him to start ovulating or lactating.
He can “feel” like a woman, but shockingly, those feelings will never manifest in a uterus or ovaries.
The progressive will respond, no doubt, that sex and gender are two different things, as they continue to labor under the impression that you can invent a distinction between two concepts by calling them different names.
You can’t. That’s the entire point here.
Transgender theory and “gender is a social construct” theory contradict each other, anyway. Progressives tell us that “gender” is a societal invention which imposes certain expectations of behavior and appearance on men and women. Society, we’re informed, oppresses the human person by forcing it to act and look a certain way based solely on its anatomy.
Personally, I think these “gender roles” are often good, useful, and important, but even if I accepted their version of things, “transgenderism” would still be nonsensical. Perhaps more so.
In demolishing the gender “social construct” isn’t the whole point to create a society where men can act in ways traditionally associated with women and women can act in ways traditionally associated with men? If gender is indeed a social construct then it seems the ultimate goal would be a culture where men can wear sports bras and yoga pants and still be considered men. But progressives defeat their own point by next telling us that when a man acts like a woman, he actually is one, which is odd considering they just got through telling us there’s no such thing as “acting like a woman.”
They went from insisting that “social constructs” prevent men from wearing skirts to informing us that if a man wears a skirt he’s now a woman. They’ve not only reinforced gender stereotypes, but given them a power not even the most ardent gender traditionalist would have ever conceived of.
Either men and women can defy these gender expectations, or they can’t. But if defying the expectation actually turns them into the other gender, then they can’t defy them.
Why is this so hard to understand?
And why is it harder to understand that I can be as tolerant and accepting a person as have ever existed in the universe, but I still can’t accept Bruce Jenner as a woman?
I cannot accept it because this is not a question about Bruce Jenner; it’s a question about nature and reality. If I go around calling him a her and speaking fondly of his decision to “transition” from what he is into something he can never be, I have not merely “accepted” Bruce Jenner, I have accepted the impossible, radical, illogical, preposterous, outrageous progressive doctrine of sex and gender.
And it’s not just progressive faux-science I’d be accepting, but progressive faux-theology.
Jenner, like many “transgender,” defends his decision to “transition” by explaining that he has “the soul of a female.” I was reminded of this today by a progressive atheist who quite matter-of-factly informed me that sometimes people’s souls don’t match their bodies. It’s fascinating that suddenly, after decades of shoving secularism down our throats, left wingers have discovered the human soul, and summarily assessed that in some cases it’s been mismatched, like brown socks with black pants.
I guess that’s what they mean when they say “transgenders” have been “assigned” the wrong sex. I always wondered, assigned by whom? And if this entity is powerful enough to give us souls, how could it be so clumsy and careless about it?
It seems we’ve again arrived at another contradiction. If there is no God, then there is no spirit realm, then there is no soul. And if there is no soul, and no God, and no other dimension outside of the physical, then we are our bodies and only our bodies. From the entirely atheistic, secular view, “transgenderism” is an utter impossibility. We are material. We are only material. So whatever we are can be ascertained by an inspection of the material. Thus, if our DNA, anatomy, reproductive systems, hormones, and chromosomes indicate “man,” we are men. End of discussion. That’s all there is.
However, if the “transgender” soul exists, then souls exist, then an immaterial spiritual dimension exists, then God exists. And if God exists, He created us. And if God exists and created us, then He is both all powerful and omnipotent. And if he is both all powerful and omnipotent then it is impossible for Him to accidentally put a soul in the “wrong” body. Impossible. It cannot happen.
Of course, people are sometimes born with physical deformities, and these cannot be blamed on God “making a mistake.” We are mortal beings in a fallen world in which sickness, death, and deformity are a temporary feature. But the “transgender” theory is not one that posits a physical deformity, but that a mistake was made in the actual creation of the human person. To believe in a fallible, mistake-prone God is to believe in no God at all, which brings you back to atheism, which again disqualifies “transgenderism.”
In truth, we do have souls and we do have bodies. Only, it’s not totally accurate to say that we “have” either. We don’t have them, we are them. We are both our souls and our bodies. The latter is not merely a cage or a shell for the former. The two are inextricable, and together they form one. A single nature. A single person. So if your body is a man, so is your soul, and if your soul is a man, so is your body. If you begin to believe otherwise, the problem is not with your soul or with your anatomy, but with your perception of these things.
The answer, then, is perhaps complicated and imperfect. I can’t say that psychological treatment will completely “cure” a man of his delusions that he is a woman, but I know for sure that a sex change operation and hormone pills won’t cure a man of the fact that he is a man.
I don’t accept Bruce Jenner as a woman. I don’t accept “transgender” as an actual state of human existence. I recognize it as an illusion, a sickness, and a burden. I pray that those afflicted seek real help instead of pursuing something they can never attain.
I pray that they learn to accept themselves as they are, because in the end, that’s truly the only choice we have.
"Liberals have already managed to legally redefine what constitutes a human being, and now they’ve set out to redefine what constitutes a man and a woman.
And... Marriage
Dick Cheney legally constituted what belongs to him and started a war in Iraq that so far has killed 1.45 million Iraqi's, he's a devote conservative so in the world of what is really wrong this conservative neocon fucking abomination is far more horrible a crime!!!
so why don't you take your dumb ass and care about something of substance, fuck wit!!
These transgender geeks .... are a freaky side show .... they don't belong in the big tent !
the links are 404'd
Transgender theory and “gender is a social construct” theory contradict each other, anyway. Progressives tell us that “gender” is a societal invention which imposes certain expectations of behavior and appearance on men and women. Society, we’re informed, oppresses the human person by forcing it to act and look a certain way based solely on its anatomy.
Personally, I think these “gender roles” are often good, useful, and important, but even if I accepted their version of things, “transgenderism” would still be nonsensical. Perhaps more so.
I would agree we cannot actually change "sex", but a chance to change our reproductive organs is never on offer for transgendered persons, so it isn't really about biological sex, but more about a societal construct of what it is to be man or woman.
There have always been people who rebelled against the status quo, and there always will be, but I do think there is something very wrong now with society and its vision for man and woman, both roles are one dimensional and out of touch with todays circumstances.
We no longer have a society where man works hard physical work and possibly fights for his country, neither does woman sit at home popping babies out constantly and caring for those babies as they grow up. Those roles used to work, but for todays situation they cannot, we cannot afford in the modern world to be constantly at war, we have no real need for masses of physical labour, and we certainly cannot have women popping out 12 or so babies in their lifetime, the conservative traditional roles therefore make no sense.
So in this case I believe the gay/transgender phenomenon is explained, it better suits todays reality then what came before it, even if the transgendered thing is still screwed up and needs work/replacing, but short of a major world disaster we need some sort of society to evolve that makes sense for men and women. I think it would be a better society in future where transgendered people no longer try to pretend to be the opposite sex, but instead present themselves as a third sex and are accepted as such, no fear of a woman on a date turning out to be a man in that case, I suspect that transgendered mtf would probably dress differently to women, just like gays dress to men, more flamboyant.
Anyway, those are my thoughts on it, I'm politically right wing, very much in the Enoch Powell school of thought, hence I believe everything should have a logical reason, and while I believe in the nation state, like Enoch, I do not believe in one that dictates how its people lead their lives. While he was an instensely traditional man, he also believed in letting others live and let live, I believe that is a good example to follow.
I still fail to see where the evolution is given the outcomes for the planet, the health of human beings and the constant wars.
This is the best Ramirez I've seen .... and it captures the fact that we are regressing in evolution .... the Socialist scum always tax, torture and kill .... the brightest and most productive .... like Muslims killing the more talented Jews !
there is a missing link between the last 2 stages ... the metro-sexuals.
People who like to have sex .... while riding the Metro ?
I taught my dog to walk on his back legs.
He's still a dog.
ISIS wants to take skanky old women as brides under shiara law. We could make something out of this if we just had enough tax free munny going into a 501c3 so that the rough boys who build brides, damns and levees don't ask for a meal in return.
Trans-Jenner?
I traveled a lot over the years and got in the habit of checking out desirable women walking through the airport as I waited for my flight. These results were pretty consistent week after week
Unfortunately, it's the 60% who have the same psychopathic skills as the men who climb the corporate ladder. Feminism has been beaten out of women. Instead, be assertive, better yet be aggressive. Shake hands like you are a man. And oh, by the ways become so disgustingly undesirable that you might as well be a man.
Interesting Airport...maybe in Philadelphia?
Where 140% of the votes go to Obama.
Liked your post though, up 1.
Just curious, beauty being in the eye of the beholder & all...
Given your observations, is this merely simplex or did you get feedback on their assessment of your desirablity?
I ask, because I've known many in our culture deemed uglier than homemade soap, yet to know them & what's inside is entirely different.
Simplex. The 60% had given up on any femininity. Land whales, butch hair cuts. struts like a Marine, had abandon their orientation as female and might as well have been men.
A look at the world females inhibit today and it is screwed up, I've seen genetic females who would be pretty if they had not made such an effort to look less attractive then the average transexual, I'm not talking they were less gifted or did not try hard enough, but instead they had some crazy idea like removing their eyebrows and drawing them back on with a pen making them look like a permanently surprised cartoon character is attractive to someone. Or fashion clothes that make them look like men, very uncomfortable women, or just a complicated way of looking drab.
Still, horses for courses, they seem to appeal to someone out there, I suspect evolution today is relying on men and women lowering their standards, and I don't blame women for not being interested in trying to look attractive to males all the time, most males look like something that aught to be planted and male society encourages us to act like toddlers apart from our sex drive, would would be proud of associating with a muppet like that or want to spend an evening with someone who cannot look after themselves properly.
Bruce has another option .... after his dickectomy .... an addadicktome .... designer dicks .... nothing cuts through gender confusion better .... than a bigger dick !
Arrest Lloyd Blankfein.
nudelmann can kill 50000 man strong army with her bare left hand
The evolution and rise of mankind came to an end in February 1896.
Liberty is a demand. Tyranny is submission..
It's called the "normalization of deviance" and it doesn't just apply to health care.
They also call it "externalization of the hierarchy"
Ramirez
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ramirez
I keep trying, but I don't think I have ever seen a Ramirez cartoon that made me laugh.
duplicate
Two completely different and mutually exclusive groups call themselves "conservative".
1. LIBERTARIANS. They say, "Don't worry about anyone else. Just get-her-done and be self-sufficient".
2. FASCISTS. They say, "All your problems are other people. Fear them, hate them, make fun of them, leer at them, jeer at them. That way, WE can, every day, take more of YOUR money and burn more of YOUR Constitution."
Nah,
There are just those who will use ANY ideology to gather power and oppress others, and then there are those who simply LIVE their ideology.
I used to work with PersonA who, no matter what you said, would respond with the word "No". PersonA would then often go on to repeat almost exactly what you said, but would change some minute detail. I never did figure that out. :-)
Is that a comment on Ramirez or yourself?
42
Holy crap. When did they figure out how to change XY chromosomes to XX? I was taught that it's impossible.
Jenner.
Be real careful about false statements to a bank. USC 18 : 1014. If they want you, they can bury you with it.
TRANSATANIST: someone who gets filthy rich by making stuff that gets dropped on people in other countries and burns them alive.
TRANSJOURNALIST: someone who tells people that it is okay for TRANSATANISTS to do that.
TRANSPRIEST, TRANSPREACHER: someone who tells people that it is okay for TRANSATANISTS to do that.
TRANSLIFER: someone who says that "corporations are people", which is saying that something dead can be a person, which means that life is worth nothing.
As far as our evolution goes, we are ultimately destined to come together. Even though we currently are far from that.
Intelligent, social animals living in large groups MUST give up individual identity to a degree, specialize tasks, and begin to function as a group for the gretaer good, like an ant colony. It's biological, and has nothing to do with an individual's desire to give up his individuality. It just happens. It must, for the organism to function under those conditions. A planet of 7 plus billion "rugged individuals" would be hellish indeed.
That's IF we keep our numbers up. Something unexpected, like a war or plague, could knock them down to where we go back to a 'nation-state' mentality.
Brought to you by BPA and the GMO Soy Farmers Assn.
I guess I'm stuck at the level of the third from the right, the one with the spear. oh, well...