This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

No Steve Schwarzman, That's Not How "The Next Financial Crisis Will Happen"

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Overnight, in a lengthy op-ed, Blackstone CEO, Steve Schwarzman described, in his opinion, "How the Next Financial Crisis Will Happen." In the article, the author, correctly, notes that bond market liquidity is collapsing - something that has been discussed here constantly for the past 3 years - yet incorrectly assigns the cause to "politicians and regulators" who "constructed an expansive and untested regulatory framework that will have unintended consequences for liquidity in our financial system."

The reason for the Blackstone CEO's conflicted position is obvious: for a company whose lifeblood is abundant credit, the only gating factor preventing it from recreating the LBO spree of the mid-2000s, and thus a massive windfall to the partners, is somewhat more stringent regulations than the unregulated free-for-all in which Wall Street was expected to "police" itself. We all know how that ended.

And while we can explain once again why Scwharzman is wrong (we will simply link back to the comprehensive explanation why liquidity has imploded at the end of this piece), we prefer to give the podium to Citi's chief credit strategist Matt King to disabuse Schwarzman and his Wall Street peers of the assumption that the collapse of liquidity is due solely to regulation, when in reality the answer is the disastrous central bank policy of the past 7 years coupled with the relentless ascent of Hiigh Frequency Trading.

Here are the choice excerpts from Matt King's May 4, 2015 note:

We take issue with the widespread notion that the problem is solely due to regulators having raised the cost of dealer balance sheet, and could be ameliorated if only there were greater investment in e-trading or a rise in non-dealer-to-non dealer activity. To be sure, we see the growth in regulation – leverage ratio and net stable funding ratio (NSFR) in particular – as one of the main reasons why rates markets are now starting to be afflicted, and indeed we expect further declines in repo volumes to add to such pressures. But illiquidity is a growing concern even in markets like equities and FX, which use barely any balance sheet at all, and where e-trading is the already the norm rather than the exception.

 

Instead, we argue that in addition to bank regulations, there is a broad-based problem insofar as the investor base across markets has developed a greater tendency to crowd into the same trades, to be the same way round at the same time. This “herding” effect leads to markets which trend strongly, often with low day-to-day volatility, but are prone to air pockets, and ultimately to abrupt corrections. Etrading if anything reinforces this tendency, by creating the illusion of lliquidity which evaporates under stress.... Because the herding is not directly backed by leverage, it is unlikely to be reduced by macroprudential regulation.

 

* * *

 

One possibility is that regulation is once again the culprit. Greater constraints on dealers’ ability to act in a principal capacity, even for a few seconds, could be taking their toll. The Volcker Rule, for example, forbids dealers subject to US regulations from running positions except so as to facilitate client trades. It is possible that this has prompted dealers to become more cautious than previously, and that this increased caution is missed particularly on occasions when markets become volatile. While no numbers are available on even prop desk profits, never mind their balance sheet usage, some market participants do point to their importance as an uncorrelated source of risk-taking, in particular during moments of stress. Nor are dealers the only ones to have been subjected to increased regulation in recent years: others have pointed to the way in which accounting and capital requirements for insurance companies and pension funds may also cause them to move in an increasingly procyclical fashion.

 

The trouble is, this still feels like an incomplete explanation as to why short-term illiquidity problems should be affecting quite so many markets, including those where pension companies, insurers and even dealers have not historically been considered particularly important drivers of pricing. And above all, it does nothing at all to explain why illiquidity pockets should be being encountered so suddenly and with so little obvious cause. At least in historically famous illiquidity episodes – such as the LTCM-related crisis in 1998 – there was a glaring cause of sufficiently large magnitude to help explain the incident. Many recent air pockets seem to have started almost from nothing. To complete the picture, we think you need to look beyond the regulations and in a different direction.

 

* * * 

 

To sum up, we are left with a paradox. Markets are liquid when they work both ways. Market participants, though, find themselves increasingly needing to move the same way. This is not only because of procyclical regulation; it is also because central banks have become a far larger driver of markets than was true in the past. The more liquidity the central banks add, the more they disrupt the natural heterogeneity of the market. On the way in, it has mostly proved possible to accommodate this, as investors have moved gradually, and their purchases have been offset by new issuance. The way out may not prove so easy; indeed, we are not sure there is any way out at all.

And there it is: regulation is merely a small, procyclical part of the big "liquidity paradox" although now that Wall Street is screaming bloody murder and blaming it all on Volcker, Dodd Frank and other rules which nobody follows anyway, one can be certain that regulatory capital and leverage constraints will soon be quietly lifted. And since these are not the reason for the underlying illiquidty, the result will be an even more illiquid market, only one where the inherent leverage will be that much greater, leading to even more spectacular flash, and not so flash, crashes.

But that doesn't matter to people like Steve: all they care is to be able to push the LBO multiple from 10x to 15x or, heck, why not 20x. After all it is not like they won't find bond buyers for any ludicrously levered transaction, allowing them to soak up the equity quickly and efficiently, leaving an insolvent husk behind.

Which means the rich will get even richer, while leave even recorder debt behind, even greater defaults, and an even greater and more catastrophic collapse when everything crashes once again, which it will. After all even Citi admits "there may not be a way out at all."

But at least we now know why calls for regulatory repeal will intensify until, grudgingly, Wall Street's bought politicians concede and all the lunatics to once again take over the asylum. Which, incidentally, is at this junction the best possible outcome: with the biggest bubble in developed markets history unfolding before everyone eyes, and with most rational people able to willing to admit what is happening, yet powerless to stop it, the only way this insanity ever ends is by hitting its inevitable peak sooner rather then later... and allowing humanity to proceed with the reset as soon as possible.

One can only hope there are enough people left alive and who remember the stupidity and mistakes of the New Normal time of idiocy.

* * *

Finally, for the real and complete answer why there is no bond market liquidity, read our post on the Liquidity Paradox, or why "The more liquidity central banks add, the less there is in markets."

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 06/10/2015 - 17:11 | 6184017 cossack55
cossack55's picture

From "funny Tuesday" to "Idiot Wesnesday". Go ZH.

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 18:33 | 6184296 y3maxx
y3maxx's picture

A simple Butterfly effect will cause the next major world financial crash and start W W 3

such as...

"I was born in Kenya"

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 20:43 | 6184685 MonetaryApostate
MonetaryApostate's picture

The goal of trickledown economics & austerity is to make the wealthy even more insanely wealthy, while everyone else becomes destitute, and all the while they simply print money at will to buy up any and all real assets of true value that produces TODAYS Monetary Value of Currencies....  That's what we are experiencing now, that's the plan, and they are moving forward with it, whether anyone cares to agree with that or not. (It means bend over America, you're about to enter a time warp back to 1930s.)  Unfortuantely this time it will be different because of the digital age they are pushing us into, that means very bad things for the 99% indeed, and even more so for those who are in debt. (Ouch!)

Thu, 06/11/2015 - 00:26 | 6185330 tc06rtw
tc06rtw's picture

 … it’s a hell of a
       choice:  Shall we have the

Washington  Lunatics
 
          or the
 
Wall Street
  Lunatics

take over the asylum ?

 

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 17:23 | 6184050 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

Yogurt: I am the keeper of a greater magic, a power known throughout the universe... as the...

Barf: ...the Force?

Yogurt: No, the Schwartz!

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 17:32 | 6184078 Fun Facts
Fun Facts's picture

"it is also because central banks have become a far larger driver of markets than was true in the past."

far too kind

today the central banks ARE the markets, and the markets would have collapsed any time since 2008 if daily, hourly, minute by minute open market operations by ALL the western central banking cabal ceased.

Call that their dirty little secret.

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 18:01 | 6184198 NeedleDickTheBu...
NeedleDickTheBugFucker's picture

Steve Schwarzman's respone to Matt King:

"That's why I'm richer than you".

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 18:57 | 6184375 asteroids
asteroids's picture

When credit dries up, as it must, these companies will reverse the process with stock secondaries and bonds to generate "cash". I'm not sure if this will work though, but, as they say, there a sucker born every minute...

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 19:28 | 6184481 Yancey Ward
Yancey Ward's picture

I take umbrage to the idea that we are herd animals!  Now, get the fuck out my way- I need to get to the trough.

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 19:42 | 6184535 fremannx
fremannx's picture

The largest credit bubble in global history is bursting and there nothing anyone can do about it now. This anatomy of a bubble explains how the coming crisis will unfold...

http://www.globaldeflationnews.com/anatomy-of-a-bubble-how-the-federal-r...

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 21:42 | 6184882 mortem-tyrannus
mortem-tyrannus's picture

This feels like one of the old school articles this site used to post that taught you something when you read it.

9 fucking comments.

They post some racist click bait bullshit article online and it garners 1,000 comments, mostly by dickhead people like me.

I never thought I would say "Can we go back to 2009?", but I am definitely feeling like Uncle Rico.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxN9Mw6iQUs

Wed, 06/10/2015 - 22:13 | 6184969 sonoftx
sonoftx's picture

I really liked the use of the word disabuse. Not used enough.

I also very much agree with the sooner the better. Several posters have stated this over the last few years. I believe they are extending as long as possible so that those in the baby boom generation(especially those in rural areas who are very independent and tend to call a spade a spade and push back if challenged; most tended to make it on their own) and I believe those of Gen X who there are many who were raised rural without cable, internet, fast food and still knew what commitment and an honest days work was. If they can outlast these until they are too old or to dependent on .gov for the necessities they may have it tied up. Not many below this haveANY idea what it is to do without or to KNOW something.

Thu, 06/11/2015 - 10:13 | 6186166 SilverMoneyBags
SilverMoneyBags's picture

The issue isn't liquidity. The issue is demand. Demand provides liquidity. Introducing artificial liquidity would be introducing artificial demand. This is why price discovery is important.

Thu, 06/11/2015 - 11:01 | 6186216 Billy Bob101
Billy Bob101's picture

If I understand what you are saying, it is that experts always think linearly, which makes them look like geniuses, as long as the road is straight ahead. Adelante, mas rapido!  The only tool they have/use is the accelerator.  Any suggestion of caution is ridiculed. Then there is an unexpected turn in the road and it's into the ditch. Que sorpresa!  Who could have imagined this?  The way the system is set up, the driver is never injured, so they push the car out of the ditch and it's off to the races again in a cloud of smoke. It's always this way, isn't it?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!