This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Beast
I grew up in the deep south of the United States, and the neighborhoods were de facto segregated. I was never taught racism, however, so in elementary school when I invited a black kid over to my house, he asked: "Will your parents mind?" I seriously didn't know what he was talking about. "Why would they mind?" He replied: "Because I'm black."
Well, I brought him over anyway, and we had a good time. Here in California, when people learn I'm from Louisiana, they assume I'm a bigoted redneck. The irony is that I've found the wealthy suburbs of the Bay Area to be far more racist than I ever knew in Louisiana. The zillionaires in Atherton are perfectly supportive of the coloreds, as long as they stay in East Palo Alto, as God intended.
Anyway, this whole shooting business down in South Carolina brought all this to mind for me. I was particularly shocked by the fact that Dylann (and right there, the spelling shows something is off with this kid) killed not just people at a church, but people with whom he had spent an hour at Bible study. How in the hell can you be sitting there with fellow humans, particularly reading from the Bible, and still push yourself into killing them? The amount of hate crawling through his soul must be mind-numbing.
Slope's patron saint, though, saw all of this coming, just like just about everything else he's ever said:
Naturally, though, the chatter on the airwaves is about the need for "a national conversation about race." Ummm, no, that isn't it. Here, let me save you some time. Let's have a conversation about race:
Person A: "There are some people that hate others based on the color of their skin."
Person B: "Really?"
Person A: "Yeah. I'm totally serious."
Person B: "Hmm. They sound like real assholes."
And............scene.
There's no "conversation" that would have stopped Dylannnnnnn from slaughtering these innocents. And as for the calls for him to face the death penalty - - - no. You really want to level the playing field against this person's soul? Have him spend the rest of his days on earth having to face one stranger - a different one each day - for half an hour to talk about what he did. A lifetime of staring bald-faced into this act of evil is more appropriate than just filling him full of chemicals and giving him eternal rest.

- advertisements -



And removing the Southern Flag from the war memorial outside the South Carolina Statehouse. Yea, like that'll do it, that's going to stop DyLaNn RoOf and other deranged lunatics like him from ever committing hate crimes against blacks again. They'll certainly never be able to find another symbol to fuel their anger and hate.
What a bunch of tools.
Hey his name is Storm I wonder if that is short for Stormfront? Just the kind of David Duke jeff rense anti black anti Jew rhetoric most of you Zhers love. Look in the mirror assholes. You are just as hateful as this guy, you just aren't off your meds and done anything about it yet.
The father should have never given a son with a history of mental illness and a criminal record, a gun.
Sorry to say that the father commited a feloney by doing so.
Wake up parents! Stop trying to be a friend and be a parent.
Whe a read the Beast filled with hate title I assumed he was going to write about Dick Cheney.
As for Dylann, it is one if the unfortunate 6% born with the genetic tendency towards psychopathy. the poor creature has devolved into a monster and should be put down with a minimum of fanfare least its own kind should seek to follow its example and expand its horizons beyond politics
Anecdotal evidence is meanngless.
How remarkable is it that crazy people show up on psych drugs when they commit their crazy behaviors? Many here say it is the drugs based on some anecdote or "pattern". Get real.
An albino tiger.
You are more likely to be struck by lightning while simultaneously winning powerball than for this to happen to you.
I have taken psych drugs and they made me want to commit crazy behavior. Wow! I better buy a Powerball ticket and a lighning rod!
Have you seen the figures for how many US women >40 are on SSRIs ? How many children are "medicated" ? It seems like Brave NewWorld and Soma
I thought this article would be about Obama.....
Funny how the Chosenite media never whines about the much larger problem of negro on white violence.
Maybe crazy is being used to effect a broader purpose or agenda?
https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2011/01/14/bracken-professor-...
You are either truly misinfomed, or deliberately lying, or bat-goop crazy yourself. I once saw a guy come in for mild depression that he'd had for a couple of months, and was put on an empirical drug regimen, and he went ape. He said the vilest things. He fought everyone. He had to be physically and chemically subdued and put in a padded room.
The Dept Head said it was just a reaction to one of the meds. And when he woke up he didn't remember any of it. And according to his family, he was quite mild-mannered and had never displayed one moment of that type of behavior or agression, ever, in his whole fifty years.
It was only the drugs.
I can speak from experience, they put me on an SSRI for anxiety a little while back. During that time, I can honestly say I never felt more angry, resentful, hell downright hateful towards others as I did when I was on those. Constant negative emotions towards others for no discernable reason. When I didn't feel that, I didn't feel much of anything, it was like being in a fog without much feeling towards anything.
I stopped taking them cold turkey. The withdrawal, er, "discontinuation syndrome" was unpleasant but it was worth it.
This was a response to wendigo.
Ever been around anyone on these medications? Ever worked with one? Ever seen a family member on them? I have. Multiple times throughout the years. My statements are not meant to generalize or over-simplify the point that some people need pharmaceutical means (at least temporarily) to deal with the symptoms of mental illness - the tales of the medical community overprescribing these powerful, mind-altering drugs and the $$$incentives that go along with it, notwithstanding...
I am talking about the (very) noticeable and many times, Profound changes that take place in the people using them. From the 'dead-pan' eyes look, to the semi - or in many cases, not-so-semi attitude of indifference displayed by people under the influence of these drugs. It is downright scary - not in the sense that you necessarily fear they might at any second 'go off', but that the person you knew isn't there anymore... Does that make sense?
They don't laugh the same, there is a marked lack of empathy in many of them and their overall demeanor presents that of of someone no longer in 'fine tune' with the world around them. Just my first-person observations, but I believe even still, these drugs are WAY Over-prescribed, with the unknowns WAY Under understood - especially in young adults. Not to mention the Fact that you don't hear BOO about it in the mainstream headlines, despite the Fact/s that their use has been implicated in nearly every one of these mass killings of the past 20+ years.
According to his own statements he must be beyond bat shit crazy. I mean, to the point where he doesn't even use twisted logic. There is no logic or sense to his statements at all.
“He just said, ‘I have to do it,’” she said. “‘You rape our women, and you’re taking over our country, and you have to go,’” she said.
So... he tried to kill every black person in America.... starting with the ones in a church Bible study class... because they are rapists... including the women???
I suggest racism had very little to do with it while crazy had everything to do with it.
http://www.infowars.com/charleston-shooting-what-theyre-not-telling-you/
I'm waiting for the authorities to say they had this nut bar piece of shit on their radar screen as recently as three weeks ago .... how many lone gunmen do you have to see before you realize they are not alone?
Naacp needs to sue the NSA for negligence. Those pervs watching too much porn and tipping off the IRS instead of properly digging down into our personal lives to save us from ourselves.
NAACP = Black Trash Racists.....I hope every one of them is shot dead, then America will be a better place.
To paraphrase Israel Prime Minister Nutt&Yahoo:
It's a great day for <choose an option>
a)Race Baiters
b) Gun Grabbers
c) Professional Agitators
d) The Surveillance State
e) Posturing Politicians
f) Phoney Media Hand-Wringers
g) ALL OF THE ABOVE
You mean Nuttyjoowho the govenor in absentia of the USSA on behalf of the chosen state of Itsahell?
I'm waiting for the authorities to say they had this nut bar on their radar screen as recently as three weeks ago .... how many lone gunmen do you have to see before you realize they are not alone?
While I certainly understand the calls for the death penalty, I think that's shortsighted.
Sure, you get your revenge, closure, whatever. But we lose the chance to study this guy's brain...Something very bad is happening in the brains of these young men, and we had better get a handle on it, and soon.
Maybe a better sentence for this type of crime is to be forever housed at a facility where their brains, behavior, etc will be studied intensely.
For anyone who thinks that isn't punishment enough, let me ask you...If it is at all possible to find out what's going wrong, and identify it BEFORE it explodes, wouldn't that be worth far more than any punishment?
Imagine being able to screen kids when they're young,like they do for learning disabilities, etc, identify a weakness, and deal with it right then. Instead of having it fester all throughout school, until they become young men and explode...Almost all of these guys gave off some kind of warning sign long before their 'incident', but no one knew how to put two and two together. It's always AFTER the fact that people go, "Oh yeah.....he WAS a little weird, wasn't he?"
One armed person in attendance may have saved many lives that day.
Evil happens. Put him in a uniform and have him kill tons of Arabs and he'd be a hero.
I think we need to wait and see. Looks like a significant drug history here.
Big pharma has much to answer for.
LOL....I'm sure the Chosenite media will get right on that
There is an inverse relationship between:
1) The level of creativity in naming offspring, and
2) Offsprings ability/willingness to relate to others in terms of respect, empathy, compassion, generosity.
Creative spelling of a child's name is indicative of a parent raising a child as a fashion accessory. These children are more likely to have pre-teen ear piercings. They are more likely to take ADD/ADHD meds. They are more likely to have short attention spans for any thing or subject that does not tickle their id.
In early adolescence, they learn to blame all their problems and shortcomings on others. This they learn from their (usually) single mother. They tell themselves stories, and the stories become convincing.
I have been working with medicaid children for 17 years, and I regret my failure to initiate long -term data collection to back my hypothesis.
You know what I wasn't gonna Tim but you got it coming...
First of all I am sick and tired of hearing these snivelling baby boomers complain about the world they help create. I bet you weren't complaining when you were second knuckle deep at the first Rocky movie were ya? But now the worlds too violent for someone who lives in the state that elected Arnold for gov.??
And now your millions aren't enough you have to lash out at this misguided little bastard? Look at the kid, he probably never had 20 minute conversation with his parents. What's ironic about this TIM, is that I bet you barely made it through the dot com crash and now you want to point out how fucked up everyone else is.
I pity you man, I really do. But here is some condolence you'll be six feet under before this twisted society reaches it's culmination. So until then grow some aromatic plants and relax, or get a motorcycle and get off the beaten path dude you need some prespective.
Talk about sniveling pussies......
For those who blame psych meds:
Do you have any idea what you're talking about, or are you just rehashing some BS you read on the internet? Taking psych meds does not turn a nonviolent person into a killer. Millions of people take antidepressants, how come we don't see millions of mass shootings every year?
It is far more likely that potential killers have abnormal brains, which doctors try to treat with medication. In other words, they were already a potential killer and were prescribed medication, which is distinct from the medication itself turning them into a killer.
You are obviously unfamiliar with logic. Perhaps you will make its acquaintence one day.
Are you aware at all on the studies that have been done on pregnant women on SSRIs and their children? Look it up. You are decieved about all this. Or you're a drug rep.
Most likely he is on them. Therefore, a defender.
I saw what these drugs do to people, most end up with a worse problem than the one they were trying to solve. One of the inventors of these SSRIs said using them to treat depression was like killing a fly with a sledgehammer.
Psychotropics totally fucked my 15 year old nieces brain. She was given adult meds illegally. At Yale no less. So go fuck yourself.
I have taken "psych meds" as prescribed by a doctor, more than once, and I can tell you that I never came closer to taking a human life than when GETTING OFF them.
There are hundreds of extraordinary violent crimes because of antidepressants every year. Any time you see a news story about a particularly gruesome and puzzling suicide, murder or the like, chances are about 9 out of 10 that the person was on some kind of prescription meds.
These meds induce thoughts of suicide and murder, even in normal people. For someone with mental problems who is desperate enough to consider harming themselves or others the drugs can easily push them over the edge. There is ample research on this, and it is one of the known side effects. Even though the drug companies prefer to keep it dark, for obvious reasons.
I don't wish to tread on your points, which were well made, just to say that a natural human being can not have an 'abnormal' brain. They have a thoroughly natural brain, that is a normal derivative, or variation on the human genome theme. It, to me, seems quite incorrect (and not honest or representative) to brand such difference with value-laden terms. A human can only be what they naturally are, and the probability is this kid/young-man, probably was treated like a hated freak for years due to that very prejudice, borne of social value-judgements, which can hardly have helped round out his disposition, personality, tendencies or level of inhibition, or a lack thereof. The physical fact is he's a product of his parents genomic combination and the social situation and culture he grew up in, and the genome gave him a starting point, and the social situation (i.e. interactions with others) that combined to turn him into a cold murdering motherfucker.
The difference between him and many people that you and I know, is most likely one of degree, or behavioral spectrum and ostracism, and not one of specific 'abnormality'.
It is in many ways the fault of the society, for the SOCIETY has been PRECONDITIONED itself, to JUDGE and effectively FORCE everyone to fall within the 'same' conforming sort of 'human', to meet the expectations required, in order to be deemed socially 'acceptable'. Which condityioned social behaviour is always going to enhance and exacerbate the inevitable spectrum of natural variation and difference, which people notice and pickup on, and turn it over time into extremism and into the results we see in this case.
Just look at the comments about how he appears to them! If I were to post a picture of Bill Gates, at age 21, would he look any better? Worse maybe? The judgements voiced are incredibly ignorant and superficial, prejudice at its glorious best.
And totally typical of conceited conformist western societies today, as well, where every one is apparently terrified of being considered different - natural or otherwise.
Society, reacting as we see above, and on the MSM yesterday as the 'story' broke, and as you've highlighted here as well, simply makes it worse, and the necessary understanding of why it occurs, becomes more remote and unhelpful, and value-laden with pre-judegments of people, and even more condemning of variations and differences in people. To the extent where minor difference or non-conformity is now socially blown out of all proportion and creates a self-fulfilling prophecy and a viscous self-reinforcing cycle of negative interaction, and an even worse culture and environment for people who are naturally and unavoidably different.
And they should not in any way be considered unacceptable of bad or freaks, for merely falling to one side or other of a bell curve! They are as much normal humans as any other human being.
It is the outragous social conditioning that creates such massive intolerance of normal variability between human beings, which is actually 'abnormal', and deeply mentally unhealthy and unhelpful, to the best interests and happiness of the society, as a whole, and to such people, as individuals.
[and I'm not surprised you got three reds already for your comment, as any rational comment attracts heaps of them in this backwoods internet shithole, these days. :D ]
You are abusing the language. By defintiion normal is what is common, regular, average, etc. Abnormal is what is not. A genious is abnormal every bit as much as a retard is. Such people are human - they are not normal. However. your point that we should not, necessarily, discard, reject, denigrate, etc. those who are abnormal is well made. You do seem as well, though, that evil is a function of mistreatment of the abnormal by the normal and can not be the function of something intrinsic to the person who does evil. That one, I believe, came straight out of your arse. You might be correct, which I doubt, but have provided no reasoning to think so.
Not so (excuse my edgy language here, I want to make a point that I thought I had already made, no offense intended, humor me).
I did not make that assertion at all. But you just did. It should be plain to everyone that any person can do harm or pull a trigger. I see nothing 'abnormal' about that, as killing is fairly commonplace, and harming and abuse is ubiquitous.
And far from my "abusing the language", as you simply claimed, you have in fact treated it as an on-off switch! This one is 'normal', and that one is 'abnormal'. Presto, just like that!
Oh really?
What I said above was exactly this:
I also said:
A bell curve is not a digital on-off classification of normal and abnormal, it is a spectrum of possibilities, so who is abusing the language? It's clear to me you are with your insistence that such an actual spectrum of people and natural variation must be narrowed down to the totally inadequate and obviously improper and inaccurate digital on-off, normal or abnormal categorizations.
Which really is quite nuts and abusive, but not of mere language or conception, but of the actual physical situation of natural variability, which we all must and do express!
That on-off mentality is and associated or implied value-judgements and prejudiced actions are also another example of precisely the sort of socialized auto-prejudiced categorizations of people, into an 'accepted' or 'unaccepted', and thus a socially mistreated and abused category.
Well if you call someone innately unacceptable or deem them a lesser than normal human being, with normal spectrum of variation of the human theme and genome, don't be surprised if they likewise turn around and reject you as well, and may do so with remarkable violence and suddenness, which is why I wrote this further above:
You are wanting to view the person through some polarized social definition filter which actually defines nothing even real, as you are just defining your own definitions or adopted definitions of some self-selected categories that you or others imagined and invented into existence, and then turned into language terms, and put them about as valid concepts and the correct and again, 'acceptable' way of thinking and categorizing and subsequently treating people.
OK, but such an approach is what produces the nonsense technocratic language of 'normal' and 'abnormal', words right out of a technocrats lexicon, which creates the schisms in the minds and then in the society, in the first place!
And even when this process is explained to you, in detail, why such people will probably decide to simply reject their prejudiced social rejectors and abusers, you still insist on misconstruing it as them being and 'abnormal', for rejecting you right back and shooting people?
Well you and your assertion of the holiness of language, and its alleged abuse, are not as sharp and correct as you suppose. Language is an abstraction, it is imaginary, it can not be 'abused', and that assertion of abusing language is also your imagination working overtime to protect some precious concept!
Yes, you defend the definition, the very source of the social prejudice and schism, created by 'normal' Dylan, and 'abnormal' Dylan. Look, I don't care about definition and classification preciousness. I have no reverence for such things as language, it is the artifact of past cogitation, and nothing more, a tool to be whatever I need it to be.
Try to understand the guy, or don't, your choice. But if you insist on not understanding via using that on-off categorization and implicit dismissal of people, it is you who create the dysfunctions, or the smooth function of the society. And if you make it dysfunctional for even one person to live happily, they will in turn attempt to make it dysfunctional and unhappy for others. "Do unto others", etc.
It's not a hard thing to follow, no language-abuse is required, no digital categorizations, no implicit or explicit prejudice, just the intent to understand the others perspective and experience - not just your own.
If you look at the guy and call him 'abnormal', treat him accordingly, that will lead to actual abuse. And don't be surprised if it is repaid with interest at some point, by some people who suffer the abuse and indignity.
So ... given the preciousness about the written word, you (society as a whole in fact) need to decide some key things:
1) What sort of society and community do you want?
2) What sort of human being will be acceptable to you in it?
3) What happens if the people borne and maturing don't meet your prejudiced expectations or desires?
Would you like to exterminate them as sub-humans, or exile them as defectives, too abnormal to be acceptable? Just look at the comments about Dylan's photo, that is the community response to him, a prejudice, so what is he going to do in response to that, over time?
Or is it you, the society, who has some defect, that leads to the auto categorization and prejudiced responses? Or maybe you wink at that, and forgive it, put it aside as a normal part of being 'normal'? "Oh, we just do that, that's us."
OK, no, I have no idea if society CAUSED him, or anyone else to act this way, or that. But I never asserted that it did, either. But it is a HUGE factor that lead up to this situation, and if the people in his community think in digital on-off categorisation terms and feel precious about their special definitions of normal, and their use of the word-concept that they prefer to lazily and inadequately think with, then yes, such a community probably would become a very negative and destructive imput upon a 'different' and thus abused person, over the course of an adolescence and young maturation phase of life.
I clearly said anyone could do these things, entirely normal persons, And the reasons for the differences (if any even exist) are usually a spectrum of degrees of difference, not some fundamental or obvious thing, though it can be. For example, how many times have you heard a news report of a violent crime, where the people involved who knew the 'perp', said words to the effect that, "They seemed so normal! It was so unexpected, so shocking, because they were friendly and talkative and just like anyone else", etc.
That occurs all the time, the so-called 'normals' doing horrendous things to other 'normals'. Oh dear! The normals are mad-men!
So give me a break with the assertion of normal or abnormal classes of human beings and implying one category may be dangerous, and the other a flock of lambs. It assists no one to come to terms with why this occurs. What is amazing is that it doesn't occur more often, given the nature of the cultural zeitgeist.
That zeitgeist of conformity and desperation to fit the accepted stereotype is the very mechanism via which the prejudice and social dysfunction and unhappy interactions arise, and grow in the society and community. It is that which triggers abusiveness and occasional violent reaction and retaliation in angry uninhibited people.
In this case Dylan went after everyone, not some specific persons that abused or humiliated him. Instead of going after specific people, he was so angry that he rejected the entire society. He wanted to destroy all of it and not just the blacks, as he wanted a civil war, like in Syria, because he wanted to cause the society to totally destroy itself. All the blacks and all of the whites, and probably the entire country.
So he was an extremely angry and resentful person, towards of the entire community and extended society that he grew up in.
Everyday people understanding how that anger and rejection came about is how a fella like Dylan could have ended up becoming a much happier and less angry fellow, and never felt motivated to do what he did.
The society and community is the very thing that he rejected, as from his viewpoint, it was you and not him who was 'unacceptable', and whom he prejudged in return.
I do not find it hard to understand this guy. What I find more incomprehensible are the caustic words like pure 'evil', beast, and a soul with a river of hate running through it. Now that truly is incomprehensible!
Dylan was not born with a river of hate in him, the anger was elicited and amplified in him and added to by the people that he then rejected, and who he wanted to destroy in a civil war or race war, that he incited. He was fantasizing about that, and thus amplifying hate in the process.
brilliant, Element.
janus
Yeah sure fine blah.
All of that doesn't change the fact that these drugs are involved in all these mass shootings. The people who take these drugs are different people when on or off the drugs. These drugs are seriously dangerous and obvously, death may result.
Strange coincidence how SOROS is always involved.
Without justice, there can be no civilization.
It's not the difference in skin color, it's the difference in culture.
I know a guy who works as a custodian.
Guy is a total zombie....acts drugged up to the gills on psycotropics.
Makes Frankenstein seem like a social butterfly.
Gives me the creeps....I try to avoid him and make do nothing to draw his attention.
Would be no surprise if he went off and did harm to others.
To me, that is the wrong approach.
I would face my fear (assuming I had any fear of him) and talk to him. Be kind. Listen. Maybe it leads to nothing but at least I would know if this guy ever cracks there will be a memory in his head of me and it will not be a bad one that makes me a target like all those other people who ignored him or raised unwarranted speculation about him.
If all he does is repeat 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42, do not use that information to play the lotto.
I agree. What is missing today is a lack of connection between human being, a strongly social animal. It is growing worse daily. I also believe the over use of medications, poor nutrition, poor parenting etc does play a role in this.
When I was hired for a micro job on PM shift, I was warned my assistant was borderline wacko and feared by everyone. They were trying to fire him but couldn't get enough against him. They managed to corral him on the pm shift but no one lasted more than 3 months with him. Well damn, I was intrigued! I took the job.
My first day, was difficult. When I made my introduction he looked at me in disdain. I knew I was being sized up. When he walked into the break room the room cleared. It was just me and a 6'2" man wearing fatigues reading soldier of fortune. I tried to engage but i was rebuffed. This went on for several weeks. We reach a professional tolerance but he would give me no more.
One day I mentioned I was angry. He looked up briefly and stared at me. I told him all my nectarines were harvested in one day by these fucking ground squirrels and I could just put a fist through a wall. He put his magazine down. "Come with me."
We walked to his car and he pulled out a large german made pellet gun. "Use this to shoot those mother fuckers." I was shocked. I could barely rack it and he told me to get my husband to help but to shoot the squirrels myself. I few days later I brought him one of my trophies. I tried to shake his hand after returning the gun but he gave me a bone crushing hug. " Good job!" We were close friends after that but I was careful to always be respectful. This made a woman boss easier for him.
Six months later he sold his house and planned to move away ( I've had enough of cali, you should make your exit too) I was off his final day and felt bad I didn't get a chance to say goodbye.
A few days later I heard screams in the lab. " Wayne is in the lobby, he's coming in to the lab!" People ran for the exits, some dove under desks. Before I could do anything, I saw him come around a corner and walk quickly towards me. I found myself in another bone crushing hug. " I am packed and going on the road but I couldn't leave without telling you goodbye. It was a pleasure working with you and getting to know you. Take care of yourself and I will miss you." I hugged him back and wished him well.
He walked out in a sea of dumbfounded faces.
I am not saying all can be solved by interactions as this but for those who aren't severely mentally ill, kindness, respect and a willingness to find out what a person needs and listening to their point of view can help bridge isolation. This cannot be accomplished by Facebook which is contrived. Unfortunately, it must be face to face and genuine.
It's been 15 years and I miss my friend.
Miffed
Priceless Miffed! Have a great weekend, & drop me a note sometime if you like. BT
great story, Miffed.
friendships are the most wonderful of life's blessings; and if you're open to the concept, you never know who fate will send to fill that role. friends can come in the strangest of human arrangements; more often than not they're full of off-putting oddities that oddly complement our own off-putting oddities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az8UDe6UQGQ
this world thunders: YOU ARE NOT OKAY UNTIL YOU CONFORM AND OBEY!
friends say: i'm okay/you're okay -- just the way God made us.
and so, Miffed:
i'm okay/
you're okay,
(your friend) janus
I'm ok/ your ok. Namaste ;-)
I was questioning the meaning of that word when someone gave me his personal definition.
I honor that place in you where the whole Universe resides. And when I am in that place in me and you are in that place in you, there is only one of us.
That worked for me.
Sometimes I think I'm a functional schizophrenic. Performing PCR analysis on viruses in precise conditions during the day and contemplating OM in yoga class or nature hikes in the evening. Perhaps it's my lack of conformity is what keeps me balanced and sane.
It is sad this sick young man could not find this. He was probably failed by many and in the end, he failed himself. He must pay for his actions whereas those who did fail him will probably not pay for their part.
I will continue to be Miffed and as I stroll my path, look to those who could use a caring heart. It's is all I can do in this cold dark world we find ourself today.
In friendship always Janus,
Miffed;-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=novXzNnVtdA
people say i'm crazy...
but...
much love,
janus
Billy Thorpe and the Aztecs studio version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vg37g4fePFE
Billy Thorpe and the Aztecs live version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtJq56cp_dk
Keith Urban cover version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am4InudnCl8