
Divide and conquer has been the most successful strategy used by humans to attain and maintain power since ancient times. The concept is simple and effective in that those being ruled are too busy fighting amongst themselves to be capable of taking a step back and seeing the bigger picture. The bigger picture is that they are being intentionally played.
This strategy is being quite effectively employed by the American oligarchy against the American population. While racism and associated violence certainly still exist, as we recently saw in the South Carolina tragedy, this remains a marginal issue compared to the relentless, systemic and daily oligarch oppression against hundreds of millions of people. The issue of the 0.01% versus the 99.99% is almost never covered or hyped on mainstream media, while issues of “sexism” and “racism” are covered and exploited incessantly. Why is that? It’s divide and conquer stupid.
Naturally, the American plebs must be kept distracted and consumed by issues that, while important, pale in comparison to the major issue of our time: The financial oppression of everyone by a handful of oligarchs and their servants in Congress. Nothing will change as long as we continue to fight amongst ourselves for the diminishing scraps of a shrinking pie and remain incapable of seeing the true problem. The status quo understands this and leverages it more than anyone wishes to admit.
I’ve found that the saying: “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled,” is 100% true. People who are ignorant really are ignorant. They don’t get it, and they don’t want to get it. Only a serious shock, often financial hardship, can get people to question the false paradigms they have accepted for years if not their entire lives. This is why I don’t expect real change to kick in until the next economic downturn arrives.
Before I share a video of the very eloquent, introspective and brave Bryan Thomas, I want to make a few things clear. Personally, I find the Confederate Flag to be offensive. You can’t deny that to many people it elicits painful images of slavery and oppression. Personally, I don’t like looking at the flag and I wouldn’t want it around me. But this is my personal preference and perspective. If someone else wants to fly it because it means something about southern pride, racial bias, or whatever else, that is their right. The flag is a free speech issue. People have a right to offend me or anyone else. All that said, I do think whether or not it flies on state capitols is a fair and necessary debate.
However, is it the most existential issue facing American society today? Of course not. After all, we have a black President who has systematically funneled as much money as possible to the most entrenched wealthy elites in America, and has governed as if his top priority was a seamless continuation of the George W. Bush administration. If that doesn’t prove to you that symbols don’t really mean much in big picture, I don’t know what will. Symbols are just that, symbols.
As I quipped on Twitter yesterday:
"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people"...and complete fucking idiots obsess about flags.
— Michael Krieger (@LibertyBlitz) June 24, 2015
Now watch the CNN interview. Whether or not you agree with his opinion, we should all agree to defend his right to have an opinion, and to do whatever he wants with a piece of colored cloth.
I believe this hype about the flag is just another attempt by the status quo to attack free speech in a crafty manner. Similar to the recent attack on blog comment sections, which I wrote about in the recent post:
The War on Free Speech – U.S. Department of Justice Subpoenas Reason.com Over Comment Section


black people supporting the confederate flag. Olympic winning athletes turning into women. white woman pretending to be black for 10 years becoming president of NAACP.
these are signs of the apocalypse is coming. the end is near.
"For many, it invokes painful images of slavery and oppression"
Seriously, kreiger? I like you a lot, and greatly enjoy most of your posts, but thats a pretty stupid statement. Are there any fucking people alive today that were actually slaves? How many generations removed are we from that, exactly? Most of these brainless shitheads can't even remember how to speak english, and they have long repressed memories of slavery? And oppression, by this flag? come on. If an inanimate object makes you feel oppressed, I just feel sorry for you. Most of the dipshists bitching about this, that Ive seen anyways, are less than 50 years old, so they weren't even around for he civil rights shit.
This is a distraction issue, "look at the shiny object in my left hand, pay no attention to the right" and you are falling for it, mike, youre better than this.
Fuck the Liberty Blitzkrieg blog! This negro wants his 5 minutes of fame.
Liberty Blitzkrieg blog always finds the outliers.
Why do we need to delete history to make current people happy? Shit happens, we are supposed to learn from it.
Someone needs to introduce Krieger to a wooden baseball bat as he's walking to his car.
I'll show you a fucking outlier!
I do like some of his stuff but yeah, he wants to be famous. I'm just glad he's stopped jacking off in public to Bitcoin.
Krieger's not a negro, I was talking about the kid in the article.
Krieger could be a redskin after I split his skull with my baseball bat!
At least I can still fly my President of Russia flag.
Until it's outlawed.
http://www.highlandarmoury.com/5-x-3-flag-russian-presidential-standard-...
TPTB need to destroy the heritage of the US and to make all citizens ashamed of the country's past in order to usher in the NWO... This is just the latest attack on white-bread Merika...
This is POWERFUL. Anyone who questions the revisionist history we've been taught should be forced to read just 10, any 10, of the quotes on this page:
http://www.coljohnsloancamp.org/reference/the-war-for-southern-independe...
— General Robert E. Lee, CSA
— General Robert E. Lee, CSA
— Lt General Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson, CSA
— Maj. General Patrick R. Cleburne, CSA, January 1864, writing on what would happen if the Confederacy were to be defeated
— William Seward, US Secretary of State under Abraham Lincoln, to Charles Francis Adams, minister to England, 10 April 1861
— General Ulysses S. Grant, USA, in a letter to the Chicago Tribune, 1862
— General Ulysses S. Grant, USA
— General Ulysses S. Grant, USA, explaining why he didn't free his slaves until the passage of the 13th Amendment, after the war
— General William T. Sherman, USA
— Abraham Lincoln, 22 August 1862, in a letter to Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune
— Abraham Lincoln
— Abraham Lincoln, 12 January 1848, in a speech in Congress
— Abraham Lincoln
— Abraham Lincoln, 14 March 1861, First Inaugural Speech
— Abraham Lincoln, 24 March 1862, in a letter to Horace Greeley, New York Tribune editor
— Abraham Lincoln
— Abraham Lincoln, 24 December 1860, presenting his stand on slavery to the Senate
— William Herndon, law partner to Abraham Lincoln
— Alexis De Tocqueville (1805-1859), Democracy in America
— Charles Dickens, 1862
— Charles Dickens
— Dr. Walter Williams
— Dr. Walter Williams
— Booker T. Washington
— Private John H. Haley, Seventeenth Maine Regiment, USA
— Bangor (Maine) Daily Union editorial, 13 November 1860
— Lewis Goldburg
— James S. Buckingham, abolitionist
— Lysander Spooner, prominent Northern abolitionist, attorney, and legeal scholar, fice years after the 'Civl War'
— James Henley Thomwell
— Salmon P. Chase, Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, 1867
— Earl Russell, Britain's Foreign Secretary
— Lord Acton
— Thomas J. DiLorenzo
— Thomas J. DiLorenzo
— Thomas J. DiLorenzo
— New York Tribune, 5 February 1860
— New York Tribune, 17 December 1860
— Horace Greeley, New York Tribune
— Horace Greeley, New York Tribune
— Detroit Free Press, 19 February 1861
— London Times, 7 November 1861
— London Spectator in reference to the Emancipation Proclamation
— Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 13 November 1860
— George Lunt of Massachusetts, Origin of the Late War
— Francis W. Springer, War for What?
— Professor Jay Hoar of Maine, in a personal conversation with author Walter Donald Kennedy
— Stephen Douglas Aug. 21, 1858 (Lincoln-Douglas debates)
— Woodrow Wilson (response to someone who asked how the role of slavery became so distorted and exaggerated as the cause of the WBTS)
— N.C. Gov. Zebulon Vance, April, 1961 On Lincoln's Call For Troops
—Jonathan Worth. (Future Governor, Quaker, and avid Unionist, he believed that his state was driven out of the Union by the actions of Lincoln, which was trying to force North Carolinians to not only violate the Constitution, but also wage war on a neighboring State).
— future N.C. gov. Jonathan Worth Dec. 7, 1861
— N.C. Gov. Ellis -- In response to Lincum's Sec. of War call for troops to invade South Carolina.
(comes out of hiding) Bravo!!! If you don't KNOW the truth, the lies of history will WONK you.
Our new Government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition....The new Constitution has put at rest forever all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institutions—African slavery as it exists among us—the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson, in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the "rock upon which the old Union would split."
- Alexander Stephens, savannah georgia 1861
Stop pretending it wasn't about slavery, k?
Read Abe Lincoln's pronouncements in the Lincoln vs Douglas debates. Stop pretending it was about slavery, k?
And by the way, we all notice your liberal, valley girl usage of "k". What next - "grody"?
You are nothing but a fucking pussy. And unlike others on this site, I will gladly say that to your face.
The vice president of the confederacy stated explicitly in 1861 that slavery was a 'cornerstone' of their cause. No other opinion is necessary to understand their viewpoint. From what you've written before on zh you obviously have a personal vested interest in believing the civil war was about other things (which im sure it was as well) so I'm not attempting to change your mind other than to say there's not much room for interpretation with what stephens said.
I have no idea what you're inferring with that last bit.
@James
You quote the losing VP's opinion of the reasons for secession and war.
Which are completely immaterial as his side lost. Did the Allies and the Axis have the same motives? No, no they did not.
The North fought the war to break the Constitution and void the state's rights to leave the union as specified in their agreements of statehood.
You kid yourself by following the fairy-tales told by our union-paid, elitist controlled, masters, gurus and teachers.
If that war, in which I lost ancestors on BOTH sides, was truly about "freeing" the slaves, then why did indentured servitude continue on (and become mandated and enforced by government)? But really, the fundamental thing, WHY were black men and women NOT declared human beings, endowed by Our Creator with certain inalienable rights?
Oh yeah, because it wasn't about their situation per se. It was about those humans as property and the government's right to control ownership of OUR property - as directly mandated was to be left alone. The rich couldn't have that, and they didn't. Just like they currently use the Jews, they used the slaves/blacks then.
Bet you think the Middle East is about defeating the terrorists, and that the drug war is winnable too?
The quotes above are a great place to start if you wish to uncover the real motives and reasons behind our "Great" war. Look beyond what the government paid "educators" and "journalists" and "experts" have told you and read the words of those that LIVED it. That was absolutely a mind-blowing exercise for me.
Yeah, a few rich morons might have been fighting for their rights to own human beings as property, but the real Elite, those that are behind EVERY conflict, war and rule, weren't.
We lost our rights to ALL property, and the most basic American right of leaving when the Federal government becomes too corrupted and controlling. Blacks still weren't considered human for many, many, many decades.
Figure it out my good man, I've got faith in you.
that black kid is going to live a fruitful life, unlike those still on the liberal plantation.
..late into his and I agree totally with the Negro gentleman, to me he is belligerent hero, although he is a pain to the twat on CNN ..but this is the issue:
“those being ruled are too busy fighting amongst themselves to be capable of taking a step back and seeing the bigger picture:
This is a critical part of the elites plan.
Divide et impera ~ Divide and Conquer a technique used since Roman times to subjugate and distract the masses of dim whitted sheep
A+ on your quote btw
The North fought the war to break the Constitution and void the state's rights to leave the union as specified in their agreements of statehood.
The guy I quoted wrote the gawddamn constitution..
If that war, in which I lost ancestors on BOTH sides, was truly about "freeing" the slaves, then why did indentured servitude continue on (and become mandated and enforced by government)?
Not what I argued.
The quotes above are a great place to start if you wish to uncover the real motives and reasons behind our "Great" war.
Argument is about the battle flag, not the civil war itself.
edit.. OK.. I agree and one thing cannot be argued..
Lincoln over-rode the precepts of states rights and installed the federalism we are stuck with today.
The criminals of Woodrow Wilson's accompanyment put the final nails in the coffin in 1913.
Obama and SCOTUS are doing the same things.
oh.. and if you do some studious research into the issue..
Lincon did not GAF about the slaves.
go flame me, all of you biased and unstudied idiots.... :-D
The North fought the war to break the Constitution and void the state's rights to leave the union as specified in their agreements of statehood.
The guy I quoted wrote the gawddamn constitution..
----------------------------------------
I thought you quoted Stephens, not Madison. Or were you ignorantly misunderstunding why the commenter capitalized Constitution? You self righteous pedants have a hard lesson coming.
I was referring to the 'adjusted' version, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederate_States_Constitution
For some it was about slavery but for many it was about sovereignty, just as the confederate battle flag represents racism to some and sovereignty to others. What we want is tolerance of all perspectives. No one has to like it. God knows I must listen to shit I hate every day! It would appear that those with the most tolerance are now becoming the most oppressed.
We understand.
We are to just shut the fuck up.
We don't like it.
People say the same thing about the nazi cause / iconography.
I highly doubt the US will move to publicly ban the confederate battle flag, social acceptance is another matter. I don't have an issue with the flag, but people pretending it is not a symbol of slavery / segregation... ridiculous.
James_Cole - is there any way you can be persuaded away from your opinion? On anything? From what I've seen from you, you are pretty dug into your positions. Why should anyone waste time talking to you if you are set in your ways and won't consider a different view? Wouldn't it be good to know if you are wrong and need to change course?
I'm wrong about stuff all the time, I change my opinion on different things regularly. But until someone comes up with points to persuade me I will stick with what I think is accurate - like anyone.
In this thread people commenting to me are insinuating that I'm not appreciating the other side, that I'm making out that the north was altruistic / blameless, south was pure evil, lincoln was a saint out to free the slaves and upon their freedom everyone lived happily ever after... which has no relation to what i'm saying Nor would I argue those points.
I pulled out a quote by an elected politician - vice president no less - speaking to his constituency in plain language that the 'cornerstone' of their cause was white superiority /black slavery. The idea that a politician would make such a high profile speech without it reflecting the majority opinion is absurd.
What was the famous unifying policy between the seven original states featured on the battleflag......? The original flag literally represents slave states ffs.
"The idea that a politician would make such a high profile speech without it reflecting the majority opinion is absurd."
Really?
No politician has ever usurped a popular cause to rally an agenda?
The idea that a politician would *not* tailor such a high profile speech to reflect the majority opinion of those present is absurd.
You altogether hold a quaint notion of the level of honor imbued in the skills that are required to rise to the post of Vice President.
The current crop of politicians uping the ante by first creating the popular cause that they then usurp must totally blow your mind.
Now go back to the above list of quotations and read them carefully and slowly; and then tell me who is pretending. Nobody gives a fuck what you have an issue with; because you're ignorant of the facts, your "issues" are beneath intelligent notice.
"Stop pretending it wasn't about slavery, k?"
Yes indeed, why don't we? Let's stop pretending that the great and good union took up arms to free the poor wretches, but rather admit that they did so, as history demonstrates, to confiscate and expand the franchise by permanently indenturing us all. Deal? Probably not.
You forgot one:
"The march of Providence is so slow, and our desires so impatient; the work of progress is so immense and our means of aiding it so feeble; the life of humanity is so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often see only the ebb of the advancing wave and are thus discouraged. It is history that teaches us to hope."
— Robert E. Lee
Let us all celebrate this coming July 1st the 153rd anniversary of our modern institution of slavery. Yes, I'm talking about that outfit we all know and love, the IRS.
Started under Lincoln, so we could all know what it's like to be a slave, a slave who can never even buy their own freedom from their master.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Revenue_Service
Ft. Sumter is to the Civil War as 9/11 is to the war on terror.
A very accurate statement; remembering the "war on terror" is actually, by virtue of simple historical fact, revealed to be a war on our Constitutional Liberties.
The victors write the myth of their heroic results.
It has less to do with what the 'victors' write than WHOM control the media... Perhaps the two are not mutually exclusive, but just sayin'...
It's time to steal their victory for ourselves. What are they doing with it?
"Oh great, we're TPTB, we're awesome at lying so other people can work and we get the benefit of their labor....but we're very worried about those guillitines...they keep us up at night."
wow, erkme, this changes everything, thank you for opening my eyes!
Revisionism is characteristic of the far-right, actually.
Holocaust denial, for example.
I can't imagine anything ever occurring to humans in our entire history that was not predicted while also being discounted, derided and punished. What we see happening all over the world was predicted by people you despise, and while you can make excuses for it, anyone really looking has no need to invent or exaggerate. It's not white racists that are responsible for this as they have been retreat for decades, and even if they are, it's not the ones waving confederate flags.
it's like the wife who deliberately starts a brawl with her husband as a pretext for calling the cops and getting a restraining order. There are always a few dumb asses that will take the bait like the murderous little fuck who killed nine black Americans. They have the perfect fool in this one and will hang their political Christmas list around his neck.....and ours.
You sir; deserve the greatest credit for your efforts. This is what happens when you read real history; you find out what the facts are. And I think we all know to our great discomfort, the result when the population does not read books; they believe whatever specious propaganda is foisted on them by the "Public Education" system, and the mass media. Both, of course, bought and paid for by the Oligarchy for the benefit of the Oligarchy. The entire country would be a different place if every citizen were clearly aware of these factual items of historical truth. Intended for erkme 73; somehow all these other posts get in-between after I post; i don't understand how the page operates.
So the civil war wasn't about abolishing slavery, but about the southern states fighting to retain their constitutional liberties against statists asserting more Federal power than the constitution allows. So the purpose of revisionism is to disguise this abuse of power so that the victors appear just and the vanquished evil? I'm at a disadvantage here, a victim of an American education. Any good (true) books on this topic?
The only terrorists we have to fear are our own war criminal govenment. All else is theater that our war criminal government has created.
Get that shit through your head. We are ruled by psychopaths.
My personal visit from the FBI says that I cannot make any statemenbts.
I suggest that you consider what is most effective, assasination or voting the bums out. Personally,,,(repressed by the FBI)
The collective 'WE' know where everyone of the 505 or so live. We have street addresses. Some know the daily routine of being fucked over by some minor goobermint functionary that ties up streets for hours at a time.
Some of us know the street address of former fucktoids that were in congress. They should not be allowed to collect a penny of (ha) social security or benefit from the nazi health system created by ObummerCare.
As a class we should be looking for these shitheads at every opportunity and taking them out by any means possible. At this ZH point, if you're not actively doing this, looking for ways to take them out, yoiu're nothing but an undefined bitch in the wind. Less than a wife's loud grievance. You're a puss.
Until/When some FBI fuckhole shows up on your porch, you ain't doing nothing. You're all hat and no cattle.
As a native American, I prefer to be called a wagon burner. I took a lot of skill to burn a wagon, the trick is to get them to stop long enough to make fire by rubbing sticks together.
“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled,”
How true. You can't fix stupid
ZH Might want to preserve T4QD's IP for future reference.
You must be sharing DB2015's sterno. That shit will eat your brain and turn your liver into concrete.
and suck it up, butter cup!
The Confederate War General Albert Pike memorial and museum located in DC, in the middle of the Masonic grid, three blocks from the capitol, is open every day. Bring the kids!
http://www.masonicinfo.com/pikestatue.htm
http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/masonicmuseum/albert_pike_statue_in_washin...
http://civilwarstudies.org/articles/vol_5/pike.shtm
http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike.htm
Cheers Crawdaddy
I'll digest and make of this what i will.
It's a Nazi style book burning! Pay no attention to the fact that Roof said he wasn't 'racially aware' until he was bombarded with media hype over Saint Trayvon Martin. So, the media drove him crazier.
There's a black guy in my town who used to have his P/U hood painted like a Dixie flag. On Saturday evenings I'd sometimes see him wearing his long sleeved Dixie flag shirt. Going dancing, I never asked him because I'm not a busybody white who thinks he needs to mollycoddle a black person, like so many whites, brainwashed by the JooBox, do in public these days.
One time in Rainbow City AL I was working at the grocery store, out in the parking lot collecting buggies. A tall black man in a cowboy hat climbed down out of his giant pickup truck and said "Howdy."
And... a few years ago I saw a young black man(20's) wearing his pants like a white man and with a belt! Imust imagined it. Never saw it again.
I'm a Southern California kid, 1959. I didn't own slaves nor was I a slave (though my white irish famiily was at a pont).
In the 80's I moved from the high desert of California to the shithole in Flawdah. Massah Mikkie orderd me there. I was promoted three levels and took a nickle an hour pay cut.
As a person, then, I could give a shit about black people...today, I could give a shit about black people. To me, they're just fuckin' people. I could care less if they feel victimized any more tha whites, asians, martians or any other race is. I absolutely don't give a shit.
I am so looking forward to the day that 'blacks' realize that they are being held back more by a false culture than any sort of so-called racism.
Black people, your woes are self inflicted, 98% of the world wants you to step up and participate. Get your shit together.
Why? Because history is the real inconvenient truth. I hate to even remotely paraphrase that other piece of shit [Al] but for the progressives/Marxists history and reason is always a problem.
Yep, the Lib MSM cannot conceive of a black who thinks for himself.
Liberals cannot think it possible that a rare man of Black Ancestry can think for himself.
They must be Kept Down, used only for votes and riots.
Liberals tend to be jew media pinatas... Just continue to Beat on the Brat & candy spills all over the place...
Fuck Obama
What? Click the up arrow!
My thoughts exactly. I am tired of black people and others going on about slavery and all this shit that they weren't even a part of. It's even more annoying knowing black Africans sold black slaves and people seem to gloss over this.
People need to move the fuck on.
No shit. 150 years? Fuck you lazy niggers.
Quit blaming YT because your culture has no strength.
YT does not put guns in your hands. YT does not kill a brother over "territory."
Fuck all of you worthles bastards.
Lincoln was right. You should have been shipped to Liberia because you cannot live peacefully with civiilzed people.
I read that the black do pretty well in israel.
Oh, woops, you said civilized people, sorry.
I'm still beating my third wife for what my first wife did thirty years ago.
You know you just can't trust women. I'm still seeking JUSTICE!
Of all the flags that Krieger feels are a symbol of oppression which one does he feel the most oppressed under? For Gods sake, the current one would be the first one to come to mind afterall, he makes a living out of pointing out our own current enslavement under Old Gory
Oh deary me... he feels offended?
Sounds more like ass covering to me.
+1
Shit! I was thinking the same, and you just nailed it.
Forget it, let's get to it:
- What is the diameter of the Kardashi ass today?
-The New iPad makes blowjob?
-The New Tesla gives no shock or burns when the water ????
-That Picture of Putin shirtless true? He's not black?
The Queen of England farted today? If farted, say, "this is health majesty."
hehe.
Anyone who delves into history will quickly realize the war between the states wasn't about slavery.
It was a power struggle.
The side intent on consolidating power won.
Agreed, Kreiger usually is on target but this time he sliced it into the rough.
This post of his is better put on the Huff Post or Bis Insider PC, status quo propaganda sites.
The confederate flag is far more about autonomy that anything else
(which is why the feds are so eager to get rid of it)
Quit smoking pot and go study history closer Mike.
There's a glaring hole in your education.
He wrote that worthless piece because he QUIT pot for a day or so and his neurons got scattered like snow on a disconnected TV.
All that express any controversial ideas or opinions whatsoever that must include their craw fishing PC Caveat qualifications can keep their worthless opinions, they are rendered meaningless.
Apocalypse has already come. You're living it, now. Slo-mo pain, suffering, deprivation, starvation and death
Partieeeeeee Time, Bitchez
How near?
september 13th.
Rosh Hashanah 2015 begins in the evening of Sunday, September 13 and ends in the evening of Tuesday, September 15.
Yom Kippur Begins sunset of Tuesday, September 22, 2015 and Ends nightfall of Wednesday, September 23, 2015. Sukkot Begins sunset of Sunday, September 27, 2015 and Ends nightfall of Sunday, October 4, 2015. Joshua the conquering King is almost at the door! Repent and get right with GOD! Bitchez!I thought "dogs and cats living together" was the sign of the apocolypse.
All this exemplifies is the consequence of years of manipulation by our dear zionist masters.
They control our money, so we pay the Federal Reserve interest on money instead of using that money for our nation.
They control our foreign policy, so we send money and weapons to Israel, we fight Israel’s wars against Iraq, Libya, Syria, and they hope Iran...
They control our movies, promoting every social divide they can, women against men, black against white, north against south, all Americans against Muslims...
They control our president, so instead of the FIRST black president being a role model for his race, he fights for "Trade Deals" and amnesty for illegals, and in his spare time he fights for the Patriot Act (and lock up whistle blowers).
We are occupied by a people who are at war with the world, and they are using America's greatness to win. The fact that we allow ourselves to be so easily manipulated is a sign a new super power needs to rise, and save us from ourselves.
black people supporting the confederate flag. Olympic winning athletes turning into women. white woman pretending to be black for 10 years becoming president of NAACP.
these are signs of the apocalypse is coming. the end is near.
don't forget to mention conchita wurtz winning eurovision.
it is like an octopus in porn movie.... no wait, japan does this....
When they finish coming for me, they'll come for you.
Mike Krieger: "The issue of the 0.01% versus the 99.99% is almost never covered or hyped on mainstream media, while issues of “sexism” and “racism” are covered and exploited incessantly." And that is why Krieger decided to write a whole post about racism! And that is why ZH decided to post it here! News flash guys: everyone has a right to their opinion; including my opinion that another person's support for the racist flag is racist. That is not an "attack" on free speech. That is the essence of free speech. No one has a right to be sexist and racist without someone else calling them out on that. Now, Mr. Krieger and ZH, how about you stop whining about people who are willing to exprress their opposition to racist symbols and just stick to defending the 99% ?
I think it's more like the 80% vs the 20%.
You say that's class warfare?
I say, WHERE DO I SIGN UP?!
Let's invent a new word. I'll start. Hundredthists.
You completely missed the point of the post...but your comment is a fine example of exactly what Mike is talking about...so thanks for your idiocy.
Stick to rhyming you silly little words, ok?
You couldn't carry his jockstrap fuckhead.
That's improper diction.
Do you mean like calling out Obama as a racist and black nationalist for his public statements and past affiliations? Our Valerie Jarrett for being a communist or our government acting as a fascist tyranny? Because to do any of those things makes us as racist as a confederate flag. And we are called out on it, put on lists, called a threat to America like its not our country but theirs.
Look in the mirror, Mr. Manipulated.
divide and conquer..........at least this guy has the incite to see it and the balls to say what he believes
He didn't seem to be inciting anything, as far as I could see.
hehehe......sorry .....my spellcheck didn't wurk
Know knead four apolageez. My spel cheker is FEWBAR two.
[SPACE FOR RENT. PLACE FLAG HERE.]
OK
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/File:Borat_Flag.JPG
"Personally, I find the Confederate Flag to be offensive. You can’t deny that to many people it elicits painful images of slavery and oppression. Personally, I don’t like looking at the flag and I wouldn’t want it around me. But this is my personal preference and perspective."
A perspective and preference born of what...indoctrination?
If you find that battle flag offensive you should find the stars & stripes and union jack (among many others) equally so.
Good post nmewn...as usual.
Make no mistake, the ultimate Goal of Bath House is the Genocide of the White Race.
Think of him as a Negro Hitler. All YTs must be liquidated.
9 to 4 up. There are actually 4 here who can't see that.
Good point. Where are the flags not drenched in blood and tears?
I think this kerfuffle is self correcting. As soon as Amazon and the rest see how many flags are being sold, they will turn tail and run the other way. Remember Dickweed Sporting Goods going apey about no more guns? I was in one last week. Guns and amo are their biggest selling items in that store..., by far;)
Mike Krieger, I don't know how to take this guy sometimes.
He finds the battle flag "offensive" because of what he has been told/taught about it. As I often do, he should read the Emancipation Proclamation (and at least try to understand what the text means) of "the flag" that fought against the South:
"Now, therefore I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, by virtue of the power in me vested as Commander-in-Chief, of the Army and Navy of the United States in time of actual armed rebellion against the authority and government of the United States, and as a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion, do, on this first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and in accordance with my purpose so to do publicly proclaimed for the full period of one hundred days, from the day first above mentioned, order and designate as the States and parts of States wherein the people thereof respectively, are this day in rebellion against the United States, the following, to wit:
Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, (except the Parishes of St. Bernard, Plaquemines, Jefferson, St. John, St. Charles, St. James Ascension, Assumption, Terrebonne, Lafourche, St. Mary, St. Martin, and Orleans, including the City of New Orleans) Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia, (except the forty-eight counties designated as West Virginia, and also the counties of Berkley, Accomac, Northampton, Elizabeth City, York, Princess Ann, and Norfolk, including the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth[)], and which excepted parts, are for the present, left precisely as if this proclamation were not issued."
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/emancipation_proclamation/transcript.html
That my friend is endorsing slavery.
He's saying, all parts of territory HIS ARMY CONTROLS remain the same regarding slavery. At this stage of the war all the "excepted" parishes & counties named...were under Union control.
That is to say, the places he actually could free slaves, he chose not to.
USA! USA! USA! ;-)
Krieger is a dumbass on this subject.
Thank you for your accuracy in pointing out the glaring holes in that proclaimation. Lincoln issued it as a war measure to further weaken and demoralize the South, not out of the kindness of his heart.
Absolutely correct, the change in station of their lives was nil. He wished to use their labor for his army without all those "needful & lawful" constraints on ones labor as a free man.
As we both know "Honest Abe" was somewhat less than honest or honorable in his pursuit of destroying the republic and its union of states, no more than what these modern day cretins who profess to understand "feelings, emotions, fraternity & brotherhood" today.
So be it, rip it apart, they work to my purposes now anyways ;-)
The Emancipation Proclimation was prerequisite upon the North to receiving Financial Aid from Czarist Russia.
The South had secured French capital to finance their defense from Northern Invasion and axquisition of the Blocjade Runners..
The North was strapped from funding for financing the invasion campaign.
You had best read some history and not that bullshit which you find in the Carnagie funded School Publications used for indoctrimation.
Did you know that while France was funding the Confederacy that, concurrently, they were invading Mexico? The French, by doing so, were intending to ensure the security of their Northern Flank.
He crafted it in that way so that those few slave states on his side stayed there. It's pretty clear from Lincoln's stump speeches, platform, etc. that he was against slavery. He once compared it to a snake wrapped around children. He's the reason the southern states seceded: he was a freesoiler. His election meant the eventual non-parity of slave and free states. Also, the south fired the first shots when he refused to withdraw troops from... Fort Sumter, I believe? At least, that's what my govt textbook said. (shrug)
Not being argumenative, just as a way of clarifying and/or explaining my interpretation of his real intentions...
"He crafted it in that way so that those few slave states on his side stayed there."
Essentially correct, the document was a political document...not some high-minded human rights document. If it were the latter, he could have freed the slaves his army had under its control. He chose not to, specifically. Much in the same way now that those who oppose the display of the battle flag today wish to win a political argument or debate, not a human rights argument.
In all major decisions he was quite clear what his real motivations were (from the suspension of habeas corpus-a basic human right...to quartering troops in private homes, go down the list) his intent was to preserve the supremacy of the central government OVER the individual and the states in which they lived.
He made that clear time after time.
Which is at the very heart of the spirit of what that flag really means to a Southerner, whether they are black or white or yellow or red or brown (yes, all of those skin colors fought against the central government) because they understood what the fight was really about.
Regarding Sumter, technically (as far as I know) the first shots were at Fort Barrancas in Pensacola, fired by yankees ;-)
What other people forget is the War between the States started in 1861, and the Emancipation Proclamation was effective in 1863.
A nearly two year gap.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/lincoln-tells-his-cabinet-abo...
Since when did one's "personal preference", no matter how ignorant and dumbfoundingly stupid, become a sacred thing that everything else must go out of their way to uphold and respect?
I dislike polka dots, intensely, everyone should respect this offense to my senses and seek to ban these eye sores from the public consciousness forever ;-)
These days, you will rarely spot an American traveling overseas sporting old glory save perhaps on the Fourth of July.
I don't think it is the threat of terrorism that caused this. I have never heard of an American attacked by a terrorist because he wore an American flag. Of course you would have to be a moron to try it in certain foriegn localities such as Pakistan.
Sadly, wearing old glory on a t-shirt or baseball cap is no longer such a proud thing to do, particularly when traveling abroad, and there is no shortage of reasons for this.
The bottom line is the proud to be an American index is at an all time low.
One of the main reasons a society falls is because its people stop believing in it. :( And one of the main reasons the people stop believing in it is when its creeds stop being true.
All national flags, from the Nazi Germany, CCCP, China to that the USA, are the symbols of legalized murder, rape, theft, pillage, and oppression against both their own people and the other peoples in the world to serve the interest of each country's ruling elite. Burn them all.
There ought to be just one flag for this spacecraft also known as the Earth to represent the interest of all its travelers'.
Yes and we shall all kneel before it and beg forgiveness for our racist and intolerant past.
Does anyone know what tolerance means? I thought it meant that while we might greatly dislike something we should not deprive it from others. Not that we must love it and praise its qualities to the heavens, but simple tolerate it.... Allow it to exist without embrace or capitulation. What we are witnessing is not simply a "market" reaction. This is an organized campaign of intimidation and we know it to be so because the world was virtually silent about it until the murder of nine black people by a racist who happened to have a photo with this flag. What if he had had a "don't tread on me" flag instead? Would teaparty people be kinder attack? We see radical Muslims commuting horrible crimes claiming in thousands of voices to be doing so in the name of Allah. Are we going to see these same peace loving people out demanding that the religion of Peace be silenced because an even larger percentage of its followers actually committed these heinous acts?
The number of white on black "hate crimes" is miniscule in comparison to overall crime numbers, yet another crisis demands action that can only be accomplished by the silencing of voices.
Again, this is not about individuals choosing to not buy this flag, this is about intimidating others to not show it and more importantly intimidate retailers and manufactures to not even sell it.
ZERO TOLERANCE!!!!!!!!!
The battle cry of all Authortarians. All governments represent authoritarianism and every single employee of the government must comply because it IS their job description. The parasites forcibly extract their sustenance from their hosts and produce absolutely NOTHING!!
Granted, many are unaware that they are even doing it, but they wouldn't mind it anyway, so fuck them, too.
This young man has it exactly right. You have control over how you VIEW the flag - a piece of cloth. It doesn't have nor does it have to have the same meaning to everyone. The flag only has power if you allow it too. This is just ONE more thing that liberals are using to divide this country. They use anything and everything to create chaos and divert attention to the greater and real problems facing this country. Let's all talk about the Confederate flag and have zero discussion about the 95 million people under-employed or the 50 million Americans on food stamps.
Looking back, I think the Confederate flag purging will be seen as the beginning of the US Cultural Revolution.
The focus is on ideological purity.
Same could be said for the SCOTUS Obamacare descision, fuck the rule of law.
Well he's clearly racist to have the flag. I am sure these idiots at CNN and others will claim that. How come CNN and these other idiots don't ask blacks why they refer to themselves as African-Americans when black Africans sold blacks into slavery? I mean using this cunt's logic and those like her, blacks should not want to talk about their African roots given what happened all those years ago.
It's refreshing to see a black person be shown in the mainstream media who isn't a tool.
Good country you all have there where a fucking flag is the main talking point going on.
It's a flag this week. Last week it was a white woman who passed herself off as a black woman. Week before that it was an Olympian man who has become a woman. Good stuff huh?
Welcome to the country of distraction. It's an indicator that the country has become irrelevant and self-absorbed which are further indicators of a country on a downward trajectory. Perhaps it will collapse but more likely it will just keep sliding down the sewer pipe into oblivion. Enjoy the ride!
Yes, the US of Values has been destroyed by the neo-bolsheviks. Mark my words, the white man in this country will be genocided unless he fights back.
@ lakecity55
Blacks won't decide your fate; they don't hold POWER over the printing presses.
Everything else is a distraction.
Blacks make up 13% of America. I do not think they should dictate National Policy. They have a Racist, American-hating president in the WH now, schooled by his Father, Frank Marshall Davis, into communist theory and white hate.
It's funny to me, though, that they could only get a Homosexual Negro into power. That is the Bolshevik way.
There are many Black Men who could lead this country, but we have been captured by the Jewish Bolsheviks. Their only hope was a dope-addled Faggot.
Out with the dope-addled faggot, next up...the switch hitting jezebellian whore.
Aren't whites from South Africa "African Americans"?
I think we are the only country that has hyphenated citizens.
Should I call myself a Texan-American?
To me anyway, a person that feels tbe need to identify as anything other than an American with a capital "A" is Un-American.
I agree, let's get rid of the hyphens.
It should just be Texan.
You know...
If we split Alaska in half, making two states...
Texas would become number 3.
Should I call myself a Texan-American?
No, you should drop the hyphen and the last word. It's completely irrelevant and somewhat filthy.
Texican is not that what they called themselves?
No sir, it is not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Hersman
^ An interesting White African.
"After all, we have a black President who has systematically funneled as much money as possible to the most entrenched wealthy elites in America, and has governed as if his top priority was a seamless continuation of the George W. Bush administration."
How unsusual. Someone on ZH who actually understands that Obama isn't a socialist or a communist (unless you mean the usual socialism for the wealthy and dog-eat-dog capitalism for the peons) and is rather just one more oligarch-serving president.
I had always thought he was a tool of Zionism......
.....perhaps not enough of one. Ever get the feeling that he lived down to their expectations?
Yes, Lincoln and all Founding Fathers must go because people cannot understand the past.
"My great-grandpappy wuz a slave!"
Yeah, but you're not, niggerweed. Man up or puss out.
"I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races - that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything."
-Abraham Lincoln
Careful, you'll have the Black Lives Matter people tagging the Lincoln Memorial--the very guy who freed them!
I'll not shed a single tear.
Until the American People understand that the most utterly corrupt institution is the "news media," nothing will change.
What, like 5 or 6 guys own all of it?
They are owned by the Oligarchs. They speak for them, they carry their Lies to the people.
You wanna clean things up? Start with the "news media." They are the Number 1 Enemy of America.
Don't hurt them or anything, just trash their shitty little satellite/microwave trucks. Get in their Face. Destroy their shit. They think they are "special" because they are "famous and on TV." Trash that fantasy. They are Whores. They want your Freedom Suppressed while they primp in front of a "TV camera." Destroy their technology and you destroy their power.
You make War on the Media, it will change Really Fast.
I lived that life as an Engineer for many years. Smash their Technology. Make them Afraid of you. I guarantee you it will work.
@ lakecity55
In the space ( time restraints) of minutes YOU seem to flit between Commonsense and Nonsense.
Whether or not you agree with his opinion, we should all agree that CNN miraculously found that one black guy.
And don't forget the greatest tactics of divide and conquer, confuse and control, diffuse and console, is to incite your opponents to dignify the debate by maintaining the hype.
Aren't Arabs from Algeria that are living in the U.S.A. also "African Americans"?
B2u :Aren't Arabs from Algeria that are living in the U.S.A. also "African Americans"?
I'll see you that one and raise you another one. I have a acquaintance who I do work for on occasion.....he's white, lives down South in NC. He was born in South Africa and is now a US shitizen. He's African American.
ha.
Why does everyone assume Blacks, Whites, Mexicans, and Muslims would all be getting alone just peachy if only the oligarchs would leave us alone? There is no precedent for this idea in all of human history. Segregation was ended to stop the incessant black race riots called "the long hot summer". All we did was trade a large-scale race war for a small-scale race war called "gang related crime". We've lost Detroit and huge sections of all our major cities to African warlord bands called "gangs". The only difference between Boko Haram and the Crips is theatre of operation.
Did Obama finally realize what shit storm he was creating and tell the news to tone it down? Nah.
No, that shit storm was coming no matter what.
Michael, quite frankly I'm surprised at you.
It's not that I condone physical bondage. I don't. However, is that fundamentally different from the debt peonage Lincoln gave us via the Emancipation Proclamation?
That flag you're offended by only incidentally represents American slavery. The real reason for the war of northern aggression was not slavery, as you contend. The real reason for that war is the very issue your own blog rails against daily- The steady erosion of personal and state sovereignty by the money-changers in the imperial federal government.
You, of all people, should get that.
And also slavery.
Are you saying that the landowners on the Hamiltonian/empirical/money-changer side had no slaves?
If so, you need to revisit history.
Not after the civil war, unless you count the middle class.
I DO count the middle class, but I get your point- I'll try to lighten up.