This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Emergence Of Orwellian Newspeak And The Death Of Free Speech
Submitted by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,
“If you don’t want a man unhappy politically, don’t give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one. Better yet, give him none. Let him forget there is such a thing as war. If the government is inefficient, top-heavy, and tax-mad, better it be all those than that people worry over it…. Give the people contests they win by remembering the words to more popular songs or the names of state capitals or how much corn Iowa grew last year. Cram them full of noncombustible data, chock them so damned full of ‘facts’ they feel stuffed, but absolutely ‘brilliant’ with information. Then they’ll feel they’re thinking, they’ll get a sense of motion without moving. And they’ll be happy, because facts of that sort don’t change.” ? Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
How do you change the way people think? You start by changing the words they use.
In totalitarian regimes—a.k.a. police states—where conformity and compliance are enforced at the end of a loaded gun, the government dictates what words can and cannot be used. In countries where the police state hides behind a benevolent mask and disguises itself as tolerance, the citizens censor themselves, policing their words and thoughts to conform to the dictates of the mass mind.
Even when the motives behind this rigidly calibrated reorientation of societal language appear well-intentioned—discouraging racism, condemning violence, denouncing discrimination and hatred—inevitably, the end result is the same: intolerance, indoctrination and infantilism.
It’s political correctness disguised as tolerance, civility and love, but what it really amounts to is the chilling of free speech and the demonizing of viewpoints that run counter to the cultural elite.
As a society, we’ve become fearfully polite, careful to avoid offense, and largely unwilling to be labeled intolerant, hateful, closed-minded or any of the other toxic labels that carry a badge of shame today. The result is a nation where no one says what they really think anymore, at least if it runs counter to the prevailing views. Intolerance is the new scarlet letter of our day, a badge to be worn in shame and humiliation, deserving of society’s fear, loathing and utter banishment from society.
For those “haters” who dare to voice a different opinion, retribution is swift: they will be shamed, shouted down, silenced, censored, fired, cast out and generally relegated to the dust heap of ignorant, mean-spirited bullies who are guilty of various “word crimes.”
We have entered a new age where, as commentator Mark Steyn notes, “we have to tiptoe around on ever thinner eggshells” and “the forces of ‘tolerance’ are intolerant of anything less than full-blown celebratory approval.”
In such a climate of intolerance, there can be no freedom speech, expression or thought.
Yet what the forces of political correctness fail to realize is that they owe a debt to the so-called “haters” who have kept the First Amendment robust. From swastika-wearing Neo-Nazis marching through Skokie, Illinois, and underaged cross burners to “God hates fags” protesters assembled near military funerals, those who have inadvertently done the most to preserve the right to freedom of speech for all have espoused views that were downright unpopular, if not hateful.
Until recently, the U.S. Supreme Court has reiterated that the First Amendment prevents the government from proscribing speech, or even expressive conduct, because it disapproves of the ideas expressed. However, that long-vaunted, Court-enforced tolerance for “intolerant” speech has now given way to a paradigm in which the government can discriminate freely against First Amendment activity that takes place within a government forum. Justifying such discrimination as “government speech,” the Court ruled that the Texas Dept. of Motor Vehicles could refuse to issue specialty license plate designs featuring a Confederate battle flag. Why? Because it was deemed offensive.
The Court’s ruling came on the heels of a shooting in which a 21-year-old white gunman killed nine African-Americans during a Wednesday night Bible study at a church in Charleston, N.C. The two events, coupled with the fact that gunman Dylann Roof was reportedly pictured on several social media sites with a Confederate flag, have resulted in an emotionally charged stampede to sanitize the nation’s public places of anything that smacks of racism, starting with the Confederate flag and ballooning into a list that includes the removal of various Civil War monuments.
These tactics are nothing new. This nation, birthed from puritanical roots, has always struggled to balance its love of liberty with its moralistic need to censor books, music, art, language, symbols etc. As author Ray Bradbury notes, “There is more than one way to burn a book. And the world is full of people running about with lit matches.”
Indeed, thanks to the rise of political correctness, the population of book burners, censors, and judges has greatly expanded over the years so that they run the gamut from left-leaning to right-leaning and everything in between. By eliminating words, phrases and symbols from public discourse, the powers-that-be are sowing hate, distrust and paranoia. In this way, by bottling up dissent, they are creating a pressure cooker of stifled misery that will eventually blow.
For instance, the word “Christmas” is now taboo in the public schools, as is the word “gun.” Even childish drawings of soldiers result in detention or suspension under rigid zero tolerance policies. On college campuses, trigger warnings are being used to alert students to any material they might read, see or hear that might upset them, while free speech zones restrict anyone wishing to communicate a particular viewpoint to a specially designated area on campus. Things have gotten so bad that comedians such as Chris Rock and Jerry Seinfeld refuse to perform stand-up routines to college crowds anymore.
Clearly, the country is undergoing a nervous breakdown, and the news media is helping to push us to the brink of insanity by bombarding us with wall-to-wall news coverage and news cycles that change every few days.
In this way, it’s difficult to think or debate, let alone stay focused on one thing—namely, holding the government accountable to abiding by the rule of law—and the powers-that-be understand this.
As I document in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, regularly scheduled trivia and/or distractions keep the citizenry tuned into the various breaking news headlines and entertainment spectacles and tuned out to the government’s steady encroachments on our freedoms. These sleight-of-hand distractions and diversions are how you control a population, either inadvertently or intentionally, advancing a political agenda agenda without much opposition from the citizenry.
Professor Jacques Ellul studied this phenomenon of overwhelming news, short memories and the use of propaganda to advance hidden agendas. “One thought drives away another; old facts are chased by new ones,” wrote Ellul.
Under these conditions there can be no thought. And, in fact, modern man does not think about current problems; he feels them. He reacts, but he does not understand them any more than he takes responsibility for them. He is even less capable of spotting any inconsistency between successive facts; man’s capacity to forget is unlimited. This is one of the most important and useful points for the propagandists, who can always be sure that a particular propaganda theme, statement, or event will be forgotten within a few weeks.
Already, the outrage over the Charleston shooting and racism are fading from the news headlines, yet the determination to censor the Confederate symbol remains. Before long, we will censor it from our thoughts, sanitize it from our history books, and eradicate it from our monuments without even recalling why. The question, of course, is what’s next on the list to be banned?
It was for the sake of preserving individuality and independence that James Madison, the author of the Bill of Rights, fought for a First Amendment that protected the “minority” against the majority, ensuring that even in the face of overwhelming pressure, a minority of one—even one who espouses distasteful viewpoints—would still have the right to speak freely, pray freely, assemble freely, challenge the government freely, and broadcast his views in the press freely.
This freedom for those in the unpopular minority constitutes the ultimate tolerance in a free society. Conversely, when we fail to abide by Madison’s dictates about greater tolerance for all viewpoints, no matter how distasteful, the end result is always the same: an indoctrinated, infantilized citizenry that marches in lockstep with the governmental regime.
Some of this past century’s greatest dystopian literature shows what happens when the populace is transformed into mindless automatons.
In Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, reading is banned and books are burned in order to suppress dissenting ideas, while televised entertainment is used to anesthetize the populace and render them easily pacified, distracted and controlled.
In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, serious literature, scientific thinking and experimentation are banned as subversive, while critical thinking is discouraged through the use of conditioning, social taboos and inferior education. Likewise, expressions of individuality, independence and morality are viewed as vulgar and abnormal.
And in George Orwell’s 1984, Big Brother does away with all undesirable and unnecessary words and meanings, even going so far as to routinely rewrite history and punish “thoughtcrimes.” In this dystopian vision of the future, the Thought Police serve as the eyes and ears of Big Brother, while the Ministry of Peace deals with war and defense, the Ministry of Plenty deals with economic affairs (rationing and starvation), the Ministry of Love deals with law and order (torture and brainwashing), and the Ministry of Truth deals with news, entertainment, education and art (propaganda). The mottos of Oceania: WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.
All three—Bradbury, Huxley and Orwell—had an uncanny knack for realizing the future, yet it is Orwell who best understood the power of language to manipulate the masses. Orwell’s Big Brother relied on Newspeak to eliminate undesirable words, strip such words as remained of unorthodox meanings and make independent, non-government-approved thought altogether unnecessary. To give a single example, as psychologist Erich Fromm illustrates in his afterword to 1984:
The word free still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be used in such statements as "This dog is free from lice" or "This field is free from weeds." It could not be used in its old sense of "politically free" or "intellectually free," since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed as concepts....
Where we stand now is at the juncture of OldSpeak (where words have meanings, and ideas can be dangerous) and Newspeak (where only that which is “safe” and “accepted” by the majority is permitted). The power elite has made their intentions clear: they will pursue and prosecute any and all words, thoughts and expressions that challenge their authority.
This is the final link in the police state chain.
Having been reduced to a cowering citizenry—mute in the face of elected officials who refuse to represent us, helpless in the face of police brutality, powerless in the face of militarized tactics and technology that treat us like enemy combatants on a battlefield, and naked in the face of government surveillance that sees and hears all—we have nowhere left to go. Our backs are to the walls. From this point on, we have only two options: go down fighting, or capitulate and betray our loved ones, our friends and our selves by insisting that, as a brainwashed Winston Smith does at the end of Orwell’s 1984, yes, 2+2 does equal 5.
»
- 67537 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
The asch test.
Start your home business right now. Spend more time with your family and earn. Start bringing 76$/hr just on a c0mputer. Very easy way to make your life happy and earning continuously. Start here... www.jobs-review.com
Fuck you, idiot.
The asch test
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA
Anderson pooper commands you.
The serfs of the coming industrial revolution will have many freedoms taken away.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/3291495-survive-the-coming-industrial-re...
This is just old tactics with newer technology applied. What were once obvious barbed wire fences and guard towers are now wireless and invisible. The sheep have been shocked at the invisible line enough they don't even venture near the frontier any more. They just hang out around the feeding trough and bleat for more all day.
http://www.downloadfreepdfebooks.com/the-screwtape-letters-pdf/
The deep perversion of Language:
https://aadivaahan.wordpress.com/2011/10/11/the-deep-perversion-of-langu...
One level higher now, all together...
https://aadivaahan.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/two-hammer-blows-and-a-rando...
Yep, it started back in the '60s when union organizers changed garbagemen to sanitation engineers. And these days when the Lib MSM has changed global warming to "climate change."
Liberals are constant chameleons, always trying to keep you from pinning them down, and thus requiring them to have to answer inconvenient truths.
And speaking of "inconvenient truths"... when was the last time Pope Algore I particpated in a debate of his ideas?
Never! He's too busy paying grab-ass with the guys giving him massages.
Oh, and only Putin uses that! And maybe the British a little bit. Rrright...
Edit:
OK, let me rephrase that. Looks the filmmaker thought he had to start with Putin so the average (western) viewer would swallow the bait to then be more willing to follow the "stop making sense" route.
The left got all this power over words because of right-wing crackers. Some of their racial and religious slurs were way over the top. Then the loony left expanded the expressions they wanted killed.
i clicked on one of your links a very long time ago, and will never do so again. I can tell its you from the stupid screen names you have, all 5 of them...
Let me tell you, you have, by far, the worst blog of all the blog pimps on here. It is really bad. You should just stop, and give up. at least some of the others have something decent to add, but not you. You have nothing worth reading, you are pathetic. If I sucked as bad as you, Id probably kill myself. Thre is no possible way that your wife loves you, and I can almost guarantee that she is fucking someone else and is probably on several antidepressants due to being married to such a loser.
Good article, thanks!
Chameleon qualities are not the sole domain of liberals.
Regarding the article's, "...that the Texas Dept. of Motor Vehicles could refuse to issue specialty license plate designs featuring a Confederate battle flag. Why? Because it was deemed offensive," this point is just off base. The state issues license plates, and the plates are state property that is needed if you wish to operate a vehicle on public roads.
Since when (and under what article, statute, etc.) is a department within the executive branch obligated to decorate its property in a particular way so someone can better express themselves? If rednecks in Texas need the stars and bars on their vehicles, then let them paint the symbols themselves wherever they want on their cars or trucks.
How does crap like this even make it to the Supreme Court?
"Since when (and under what article, statute, etc.) is a department within the executive branch obligated to decorate its property in a particular way so someone can better express themselves?"
I feel the same way about all the vanity plates, save the turtles, educate the children etc. They shouldn't be allowed to express themselves this way by defacing "government property" ;-)
Politicians decide what the state may or may not do. Want Confederate Battle Flag state liscense plates? Elect politicians that will give them to you. Don't like "save the whales" or any other slogans on state liscense plates? Elect politicians who will get rid of them.
This entire post is based on false reasoning. If you are a racist fuck who wants the American Swastika on your car, then paint one on it. The government won't stop you. They just don't have to provide you with one if they decide not to.
http://www.downloadfreepdfebooks.com/the-screwtape-letters-pdf/
The communist movement was run from New York. In Russia, it was a bloody revolution led by the Jews. The Russians knew they had been overtaken by an alien ideology. In America, it was done taking over the American mind by infiltrating the educational system, media and other social and cultural institutions not to mention the govt. itself. I believe they took that approach because a frontal assault would have failed given that Americans were armed. Most Americans don't know they have been programmed with a false consciousness.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVEDEvH2iLY&ab_channel=GavinPariah
.
What ’communist movement’? The Rockefellars, the Vanderbilts, the Morgans etc.? The people owning the US (and most of the rest of the world)? Meaning a small minority of capital owners (the own pretty much all productive assets in the world). And a small minority owning and controlling the monetary system.
Basically a small cult of SUPER-CAPITALISTS. And no, capitalism is not defined by free markets. That’s just one way of organizing a capitalist economy. You can easily have – and for the most part that’s the end-destination of all capitalists economies due to the accumulative nature of that system – huge monopolies and strong (privately controlled) states in capitalist economies. Capitalism is defined by who owns the means of production. Is it public, common or private? Almost everything of importance are owned by a small undemocratic elite = CAPITALISM.
In US all (real) left-wing intellectuals, movements, medias and artists were driven to hiding, exile or jail during the McCarthy-area. Since then the only one speaking about left-wing in US are (in a European and most of the rest of the world context) right-wing.
And no, I’m not a communist. But as a comment to an article about using the right words it needed to be rebutted.
They were bankers, moneychangers, mafia, not capitalists. Their goals are mainly political. They hide themselves behind market economy (capitalism) but they don't favor free market. They created hundreds of intitutions to hide that fact and to mislead the public around the world. They have huge propaganda machine - the biggest media corporations that spit out the bullshit every single day.
This is not communism or socialism vs capitalism, it's nihilism vs sane world.
...market economy...? That's your definition of capitalism?
But I agree – this is not a fight between socialists/communists and capitalists. There’re no ‘socialists/communists’ of any importance on the world stage. The West have been – de facto – taken over by the banksters. There has been a, uncovered by the media, coupe de tat of the state institutions by the corporations/banks. This happened slowly – at first – with more and more concentration of wealth in fewer and fewer hands. But lately it has accelerated and now they don’t even try and hide their power over the states – it’s in plain view.
The establishment of the US ‘federal reserve’ (they have no reserves and are not federal) bank was the first step, so the process – that we now see the fulfilment of – have been long.
In my definition – and the political thinkers of the last 100+ years – of capitalism is still: an economy based on the private ownership of the means of production. That’s what we got today. It’s not the ‘libertarian’ wet dream (utopia) of a free market economy. It’s the reality of what capitalism evolves (devolves) to – the concentration of power in fewer and fewer hands. We’re at the end game of capitalism – next is total enslavement or revolution.
I figure the 1 percenters want fascism for themselves and socialism/communism for everyone else. Basically they want to take the world back 2000 years.
Super capitalists my ass. Super Progressive assclowns is more like it.
It is the constitutional conservatives that cannot be found.
Your comment is an amazing piece of progressive criminal propaganda.
Embrace your progressive suck, assclown. Don't try to hide it.
You need to wrap your tiny criminal mind around the fact that the progressive stupid, it burns.
Grimaldus
I like debating people with no substances in their ‘argumentation’. It’s like talking to a child – you get surprised with the responses you get.
I’m ‘progressive’ (not in a US sense = as used by the corporate medias or their – indirectly/directly owned right-wing talking heads in the ‘alternative medias’).
Progressive: “favoring or advocating progress, change, improvement, or reform, as opposed to wishing to maintain things as they are, especially in political matters”. And you favor the status quo?
FYI: I’m an anarchist and I'm not educated or indoctrinated in US.
"FYI: I’m an assclown and I'm not educated or indoctrinated in US."
Fixed it for ya.
Grimaldus
I stand corrected and bow down to your intellectual superiority – I now considered, based on your insights, revising my world-views.
Thank you for not confirming by biases’.
Progressive criminals will stand TRIAL and be CORRECTED in prison. The blowback against the progressive tyranny you attempt to relabel is very likely to be a surprise tsunami of overwhelming ferocity. Bowing will do you no good. I would recommend rifle plates combined with a good level 3a Kevlar carrier, an FN Scar 17 and as many full mags as you can carry.
Best of luck with that. I am sure, being the elite progressive superbrain that you are, it will be no problem.
Grimaldus
I look forward to your society - sounds like a free and fun place. I hope it's people like you who get to set the agenda when the revolution comes.
sorry to see so many down votes, as you are quite correct.
People seem to conflate "free markets" with "capitalism". They are not the same thing at all. And, as you mentoned, the inevitable result of a 'free' capitalist society is the same result as a game of Monopoly you played as kids - one person owns up owning everything. My economics prof taught me that back in the 1970's, when he was one of the few exploring this new thing called "game theory".
But when I asked him what happens next, he just smiled and said "Forcible reset!". Which, as many here fear, seems to be where we are heading. The rich are getting too decadent, too in-your-face, and their attempts at bread and circuses - which is really what the article's author rails about, dressed up in 21st century clothes - are beginning, pace Greece, to fail. Already, the Greeks are discussing civil war; I have no doubt that when the EBT/SNAP cards don't get reloaded on time, the FSA will rise up, and as most mobs do, begin to destroy without thought or justice. How it all washes out, I have no idea, but people who hang on to outmoded ideas like "We're capitalist so we're free!" are going to be very sorry indeed.
One of my favorite euphemisms of the new age has to be the one invented by the ECB for the Cyprus theft of depositor's money to bail out banks and ensure the continued luxurious piggy lifestyles of the elite's - the infamous "Stability Levy".
That the A #1 winner of the skullduggery of the modern Kleptoligarchies; stability for who? The elites. A levy on who? Commoners. And why? Bankster corruption and their complicit politician lackeys.
Next they'll be calling shooting unarmed people in the back "peace keeping".
Oh wait...
My least favorite - Anti-Semetic was introduced by Zionists to replace Anti-Jew when most Jews are not Semetic and many Jews are Anti-Semetic. This Pamela Geller for instance, is Anti-Semetic. Take back the language.
How long before saying something like "faggot" gets you in big trouble?... we're headed for doo-doo-iferous times.
"So...before. I tell you what I have tell you i want you to know you aren't allowed to use any bad words or show any expressions of anger or Ill will, okay?
Okay...good.
Now the Puerto Ricans have just stiffed us for 68 billion
Woe! Woe! Wait a minute here! Didn't you just hear...holy fuck!...
So what, the FED can print that in a minute.
good point, but only up to a point.
or 'for a time' in fed speak
We all know that the FED can create that amount in less than a second. Since today we are fortunate enough to have a leap-second added to the day, I recommend that the FED use that extra time to bail out Puerto Rico. Then all the residents of the island can go bailar.
That's just an old English expression, used in their Public schools (Private schools in US English), where a Freshman was initiated into the hierarchy, by having to do menial tasks for the older 'boys'.
As in "Who were you faggoting for?
It could also be a bundle of sticks.
And "Having a gay old time" simply meant "Having a jolly good time".
Queer was a synonym for Strange.
Homo was short for Homosexual.
A rainbow was just a rainbow.
Referring to a man a being "Light in the loafers" or a "Fairy", was a veiled reference to an effeminate man who was probably a Homo.
Terms like Imbecile, Moron, Idiot, or Retard were originally clinical terms in psychology and psychiatry, before they took on mainstream connotations as abusive or sarcastic terms. Even the word Cretin comes from the French reference to 'Christian', which was short for 'Christian soul', and a veiled/coded reference to someone who was still a 'Christian soul' in spite of their mental deficiency.
The mindset and culture was that of "Sticks and stones may brake my bones, but (mere) words cannot hurt me."
Now Reverse Snobbery has taken root, and it's OK or even Cool to be dumb (if you're white or brown). Asians and Jews are considered or expected to be 'smart' -- which is true in most cases, for these populations in Europe and N.Am.
Being "Blonde" is now acceptable forms of ridiculing blondes or anyone not terribly smart, as it specifically allies only to Whites -- who will not complain, or no longer seem to have the 'right' to complain about anti-White racism.
The demographic groups that are safe to stereotype as either dumb or evil, are those who do not have a body of paid Lobbyists. These are White Men (in virtually all sitcoms or crime shows), Russians, Iranians, Mexican drug lords, or ME terrorists.
Former social and political Outsiders are now Insiders and Hipsters. If you add the 2-7% of said former Outsiders to the dominant, ruling 2%, you get close to 10% of a country's population. That is enough to create a social and political Infrastructure to rule over the other 90%.
Say I have some bundles of sticks I'm handing out to homeless folks for them to use keeping warm, and I limit each person to one faggot (bundle of sticks, that is.) Someone then complains that they want more faggots, and I'm being "too niggardly in my benevolent disposition of faggots". Would someone get in trouble for that sentence?
i lost account 3 times in 6 month just because i wrote my thoughs here...
been reported many times it seems, some have nothing to do than copy past links & numbers of comment to the boss, just like cooperation with germany in the past... so much humans are in silence shitting discretly in your neck by delation, no ballz to face the event, they are totally vicious and perverted just like snakes.
to make a population budge and react like greece you have to humiliate them over half a decade, worldwide, and even this, you face a 50-50 in the public opinion about their own situation...
how the fuck on earth you want billions of people to unite against those who drive the world in the wall if you cannot have the FREE behavior to display what you are and what you think... because if we let you, you gonna vex the other, poor tiny boy, this is politicaly incorrect, it may cost you some voice in the election race...
mixing and hybridizing weaknessess never made strenghs... why nobody is allow for exemple to tell that imigration business of cosa nostra in italia with somalian & libyan people would be eradicated in 2 weeks by filming army bombing & sinking boats with migrants inside to african medias to just show em YOU NOT WELCOME...
hoooo human rights.... i forget...
in my country a thief who get hurt while he robing you, suing you, win and you have been robed and you are prisoned... magnificant...
in usa you see cops shooting guy running like monkeys at the 1st ear of siren, some applause ( like me ) you get reported and muted... wtf...
we make more media noize about a single crazy muslim beheading his boss in france than the 38 tourists in tunisia ...of course tunisia is 1st country worldwide providing terrorists and 10% mosquee are salafist ones
and of course nobody will admit that usa is financing thousands of people doing same crazy allah_my_ass in mid-east location for ressources just to mess to keep 1st rank in the globe which they have lost long time ago ... so asleep that they prefer elect twice in a row a black to display gay flag on white house to please miami and san fransisco fagz community, who have certainly better purchasing power...
" as long it do not touch my kids or family, i do not give a fuck", and even more, some joke about that.
global scale SHTF must happen to make societies in the world wake up before it is too late because it is seriously astonishing that whites accept to live in a " GAY_ASS_FUCK, OIL BEHEADINGS, from EBT to RIOTS " world !!!!
i mean...wow man, wtf...
"How long before saying something like "faggot" gets you in big trouble?"
You're late, Skateboarder. Just try to use that word publicly, like in front of students in a university, and see yourself immediately losing your job and any career prospects, forever, after having endured a weeks-long smear campaign aimed at pushing you to suicide.
Your sentence should read "how long before saying something like "homosexual" instead of the approved "gay" gets you in big trouble?
RE: your link
Citing Elizabeth Warren.
REALLY?!!!!
Idiot.
Correction: MARXIST idiot.
Group stink
"...The power elite has made their intentions clear: they will pursue and prosecute any and all words, thoughts and expressions that challenge their authority..."
I promise not to challenge the power elite's authority - as long as they are fed into my wood-chipper feet-first.
Velvet Jones
Be a ho.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZVnve5wG0A
You can also just LIE ALL THE TIME AND CALL IT "NEWS"
right!!! ALL APOLLO MISSIONS LAUNCHED EAST BOUND WHILE THE MOON WAS WEST BOUND
...here's Amanda with the weather.
"It’s political correctness disguised as tolerance, civility and love, but what it really amounts to is the chilling of free speech and the demonizing of viewpoints that run counter to the cultural elite."
Just turn the words around. Beat them at their own game.
Won't work. One, they won't listen to or be capable of understanding a reasoned, non-emotional argument that's not been approved by the media. Two, with 'penalty' meaning 'tax' and 'state' meaning any damned .gov agency they want it to mean, you should understand that THEIR game is rigged, eternally, in their favor - and you can't win.
States Seeking Voter Citizenship Proof Denied by U.S. Supreme Court
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-06-29/states-seeking-vot...
States rights? lol
In two days the tyranny of a banking cartel showed just how strong it has become and the people and their sorry representatives so helpless. For the Supreme Court literally wrote its own constitution in Obamacare and same-sex marriage, and now, they override again the Founders’ dream of self-determination by the sovereign states.
Last week, the court ruled that the justices can regulate religion and legislate government healthcare so sweeping and destructive that it will literally choke the economy built by the American people. And even though the Constitution allows states to determine voting ages and voter qualifications and marriage requirements, the court now pronounces the judges’ authority to disallow states to identify its voters, even if they are foreign nationals.
One of the most significant comments concerning the rulings was made by a court observer who explained that the Supreme Court justices are appointed to serve for life only on good behavior. And he demands that the justices in the Obamacare decision must be impeached due to bad behavior. Roberts, in particular, literally wrote his own law in order to override the wording of Obamacare. Again, depriving the states of their constitutional rights.
The right to vote by people who are neither citizens, property owners nor tax payers is literally destroying the country.
The Founding Fathers put certain restrictions on who had the right to vote. The basic principle that governed voting in colonial America was that voters should have a “stake in society.” Just because you are a citizen or walk across the nation’s borders should not automatically give a person the right to vote himself the treasury. One restriction instituted by the colonists against mob rule was limiting voting to property owners because a person with a vested stake in the country is careful how he votes his property.
"Each of the thirteen colonies required voters either to own a certain amount of land or personal property, or to pay a specified amount in taxes," according to Steven Mintz in “Winning the Vote: A History of Voting Rights."
John Adams believed that an equal voice, in all acts of state. “tends to confound and destroy all distinctions, and prostrate all ranks to one common level.”
There have always been more C and below students than B and above; think about the plight of education should the classroom be ruled as a democracy. As James Madison said, “democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.”
Obama is a product of Supreme Court “democracy.” If America is to survive, the system has to be changed at the center; these decisions are not made for any other reason than to gain more power on the way to world government.
I've said it often - the worst thing for any democracy is 'universal suffrage'. If you don't have skin in the game, you can't vote. Property, taxes paid, or time in service (e.g. Peace Corps, army, etc.) - if you haven't put anything in, you don't get to vote to take anything out.
"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."
I imagine Shakespeare would not be allowed to write this today. On the other hand, he would have a difficult time deciding which to kill first, the lawyers, the bankers, or the politicians.
First the head, then the appendages: Headline Reads: Davos Isolated, Under Quarantine: Apparently "cropdusted" by a Single-Engine Aircraft--But With Blood-100 Angry Litres of Ebola;a fine mist for every lung...
"In such a climate of intolerance, there can be no freedom speech, expression or thought."
Just turn it back on them.
So? ZH does the same thing. If someone uses the wrong tone when refering to race, etc. such posts will be removed and the user baned. Lead by example or STFU.
I was banned from commenting at The Globe and Mail because I quoted Orwell and linked Zerohedge.
Thomas Darcy McGee didn't like it and banned me.
a Badge of Honor!
I've been deleted a few times on zerohedge. You shall know me by my avatar.
totally agree
Yeah Tyler practice what u preach
Your stupidity offends me. Your taking offense offends me. Your control of speech offends me. Your attempt to control thought and words offends me. Your system offends intelligent discernment.
I reject you, because you offend free speech, free thought, or free action.
I offend, therefore I am distinct. You are offended, therefore you fear thought.
Liberal fascism.
The 11th Jewish Commandment: Thou shalt control the media.
The Left which is ultimately about state control of everyone and everything is full of contradictions and twisted meaning. In fact, the basic concept of empowering the State to set yourself free is Orwellian.
"Liberals" are not actually liberal. They are leftist-statist-collectivist-autocratic molders of society. Libertarians are actually liberal as in the orignal meaning of favoring freedom.
Soviet Socialists (communists) are the far left and National Socialists are the far right. What? Socialists on both sides? Soviet and National Socialists differ only slightly in their views of markets. Otherwise, they are near twins. The far right are anarchists and libertarians with zero to little government and maximal individual liberties, the exact opposite of the Left.
Leftist anarchists are actually socialist statists. These are the "anarchists" you see at the G8 meetings. They are anarchists only in the mayhem meaning of the word. Real anarchists are no government as stated above.
"Green" equals socialist.
"Sustainable" or "self sustaining" in energy means subsidized and unsustainable economically.
"Speaking truth to power" means protesting only where it is safe in Western countries and is generally speaking to their own.
"Rights" equal privileges as in "right to free health care".
"Free" means paid for by someone else and probably very expensive.
"Diversity" equals conformity.
"Tolerance" is intolerance unless you agree with them.
The entire Left is based on falsehoods from the nature of man to the inherent moral and intellectual superiority of those in government. It is why it must always fail over time.
I actually just bought a copy of 1984 to read again and refresh myself...before it is banned, burned and forcibly forgotten.
I am Left. The Bill of Rights wasn't written so that one could proclaim their love and worship of Ayn Rand by advertizing racist slogans while practicing their state given privilege to drive a vehicle licensed by a non amendment protected entity. And, if Green equals socialist, then Carcinogen must equal Libertarian and that's just fine. What are you going to do with your $150 that you receive for you pro rata share of the interstate highway system? Spend it on tolls, or a personalized racist plate?
If you're going to post, do please try to make a point instead of spewing out incoherent, irrational gibberish.
Thanks for giving more evidence to my points.
1. Please describe those offensive racist slogans on the license plates.
2. "State given privilege,"eh? Doesn't the state represent the citizens? At the very least, is it not a privilege granted by the state's citizens with the state apparatus only governing the activity by citizen consent?
3. Your "non-Amendment protected entity" is not the will of the people? Whose will does that "entity" represent?
4. First, you describe some almighty state entity 'allowing' people to do things. Then, you diminish that same "entity" with "non-Amendment protected".
You seem confused. But you warned us with "I am left."
"You seem confused. But you warned us with "I am left.""
Ouch!
To paraphrase the SCOTUS, I know a racist when I see one. I've met those who adorn themselves with the Confederate flag (license plate for example) and they are racists. It makes me think less of them but they have a right to wave a losing flag or post remarks that others find offensive. Maybe the State shouldn't facilitate their insecurity? Maybe their Freedom of Speech ends when the rubber hits the taxpayer's road?
Elected/appointed Citizens, have granted other citizens the privilege to drive (that is what they can take away-not your license) but this "government" is not protected by the Bill of Rights; we are protected from it (them), we limit their rights. They simply will no longer be allowed to issue the plates, as per the governed citizens--in this example. Unfortunately it is consistantly the Right that votes for those limiting freedoms to citizens and granting them to corporations. The POTUS was interviewed (Marc Maron) by a lefty on the radio following the latest shooting and Obama used the N word. NBC bleeped that word out of it's Nightly News broadcast. I was offended by Orwellian political correctness but NBC is just practicing capitalism, right? And Trump is dumped? Evidently, nobody wants to hear those words anymore. Dropping the N word and slamming a whole race at one time must not sell soap. Blame capitalism for those language police tactics. It may be confusing but many on the left gravitate toward Libertarians (with exceptions). We shouldn't have to choose between someone's interpretation of all of the "ism's".Conside meds for bipolar disorder.
Slogan speak. You are an excellent example of the totalitarian left.
hook, line and sinker.
+100
Correct on all points.
(This post is Big Brother Approved)
I see why it’s difficult debating politics with ‘US-people’. There’s simple a huge difference in the view on ideology.
First DNSAP (the German Nazis) were never socialists. They summarily killed, if caught, union members, socialists, communists and anarchists. They worked closely – and could only attain power with the help of – capitalists (the Bush family (Prescott), Ford and the German industrial elite). They saw Hitler and DNSAP as a bulwark against ‘Bolshevism’.
Second, I’m a left-wing anarchist. I fight ALL FORMS OF CONCENTRATED POWER – being market-formed or state-formed. What we have today is fascism. The state has become a tool of the banks/corporations. That can easily happen within a capitalist economy (actually, that’s what you would expect to happen – it’s the natural outcome of a capitalist economy).
Third, Orwell was himself a socialist and fought in the Spanish Civil war in the international brigade against the fascist Franco, Hitler and Mussolini (and including – indirectly – France and UK).
The difficulty you have revolves around your lack of knowledge, intellingence, and the skill to use either. I have read several of your ridiculous post and everytime you "open your mouth" you reveal your indoctrinated idiocy.
First of all, capitalism is the use of capital in a free market to profit from a good or service produced. Your "young" ass probably has never seen real capitalism because you have grown up in a world or crony capitalism and were educated by socialist/communist in the public school system teaching their newspeak version or what capitalism is. It is obvious they did a good job turning your stomach against the greatest economic system the world has ever known. There is so much factual documentation proving capitalism to be the best economic system that I waste time and exceed you ability to grasp by even beginning to list it here. GO LOOK IT UP! Capitalism is a contest, pure and simple. A contest of skill, ideas, work ethic, efficiency, creativity, etc. That operates within a set of rules. The simple problem with capitalism in America is the referees have been bought off and have no integrity. Free markets don't reward the one with the most money (or ability to borrow debt). Free markets reward ingenuity, hard work, creativity, skill. Cronies pay politicians to change the rules to benefit them and take over free markets. The banks have corrupted free markets by supplying a huge source of money that greatly exceeds any value out there. Debt and Insurance (both banker games) have driven prices and "table stakes" out of the reach of common people. The government has played a huge role in creating this Crony effect because those whores in DC take payment to skew the rules in favor of the bankers. So learn a little about the system and real capitalism before letting everyone know just how stupid you are.
Second of all, it doesn't matter if they are communist, facist, nazis, socialist, etc. They are all COLLECTIVIST which leads to the same outcome........everytime. A powerful central gov that tells everyone what to say, think, and how to live.
Government is necessary. What we need are men of character and integrity that see there is something bigger and more important in this life than growing their wealth and bank accounts. We had that once but it ended in about 1860 when the crooks pushed the men of character out of leadership and have done so ever since.
Nice post bshirley. I would add that they (socialists and friends) are all autocratic and collectivism is really an excuse. The stuff about Hitler and unions is no different than the Soviets and unions. Autocracy cannot be at both ends of the spectrum.
The absurdity of Hitler and pals not being socialist-collectivist-autocrats is to say they did not know what they were doing when they named themselves.
There are NO socialist anarchists. It is an impossibility.
Capitalism is about voluntary economic relationships in a society if you boil it all down. We have not seen that in a few centuries. Voluntary relationships empower individuals. Involuntary requires government control and empowers governments. That is how you hand out protectionism, favorable tariffs, selective tax rates and so on.
The whole "corporatocracy" conspiracy thing still requires government, i.e., guys with guns at the core. Walmart cannot raise your property taxes, pull you over for speeding, monitor all computers and cell phones, pass out favorable tariffs and import quotas or alter labor laws. Leftists never admit or even seem to realize that their all powerful state creates the very thing they claim to hate.
That post needs to be published in the textbooks. Then we might have some hope.
I agree with some (not here) who suggest that treating land, labor and money as commodities instead of capital leads to their degradation. Like throwing darts at stocks in a bull market, capitalism succeeded in the U.S. mostly because no country ever had so many unexploited natural resources to exploit. And it does seem to me, that capitalism is failing, not because it doesn't work, but because of it's success.
When you worship your god, Ayn Rand, do you ever ponder where these "free" markets are? A barber shop--fair exchange for a service or more pure yet, an estate auction perhaps. One of many sellers and multiple bidders make markets. Few other examples actually exist. Businesses have associations and cartels and ALEC and less than 6% of the private workforce is represented in collective bargaining. For the Ayn Rand type, it is always the externality. It is always the corrupt politician or the regulation or the union. When capitalism rises above the muck and is legible, it is the black market--drugs, alcohol, prostitution etc., all o.k. by me but, certainly more profitable if the DEA, and other "authorities" are on the take--can it be stopped? 1860? What about the panic of 1857? I know you don't favor free labor (slavery) however I would favor encouraging a large percentage of the population to return to the land. That may be your best good old days idea. I was on a bond desk before and after the 1987 crash and have traded billions of dollars worth of governments and corporates and stocks as well. I've been present when insider information changed hands with some of the largest managers in the world and have seen the rewards. The game has always been rigged and some politicians have always been corrupt. I agree with 75% of what you describe however, just because one criticizes capitalism they are not necessarily uninformed, uneducated or emotionally disturbed.Some subjects just shouldn't be brought up to begin with...and yes I think anything having to do with the U.S. Civil War is one of those things.
Having said that it is odd how when "the media" says something all us "puny humans" tend to simply repeat it...as if by somehow "saying it again" suddenly truth is revealed.
Seems to me ...certainly of late because I never watch television anymore...folks really do want to be told how to THINK.
"Hence the value of totally offensive speech" in my view since "who the hell even thinks like that?" (And the answer OF COURSE is NOBODY.)
My problem with inoffensive people is they tend to turn out to be serial killers.
People who take the time to mouth off as to your race, gender, sexual orientation, etc generally speaking only have time to do just that: mouth off.
Folks who are quiet, keep to themselves, have no interest in connecting or want to enagae folks in any conversational way or (ill?) manner ...that sounds like ideation to me rather than being "expressive."
Of course "expressive people" make for good rioters too...and who doesn't love a good old fashioned riot from time to time?
So lighten up Supreme Court!
Anarchic Speach might be the way forward here!
Now repeat after me: "free market Capitalism is the best path to prosperity!" Especially when it includes bailouts, moral hazard, unwinnable wars, trillion dollar defense boondoggles, NSA spying, secret Courts, drone strikes, serial rendition...all resulting in TOTAL ANARCHY ANYWAYS.
Yep, no doubt! It's all because people talk funny and say bad things that's the problem here!
Don't give your vote, nor your precious bodily fluids, to these monsters!
Time for the great mutiny from those who have stolen our treasure to rule the world. Stolen our lives. To rule the world.
Simple score voting.
No more Clinton/Bush.
Stop it.
We have the old single-selection two-party. So no choice at all for you.
The "republic" is simply ruled by judges who may, for example, throw gays a bone for show now and then, but really only watch out for the rights of the people who matter -- the rich, of course.
Democracy means knowingness and good will of the PEOPLE. Not the republicist rapaciousness of the judges.
Teach the people! Trust The People! We are not the "mob"! The rich Great Gamers are the real mob. You have to know the truth and seek the truth and the truth will set you free.
There are two entirely different kinds of elections, and kinds of "contestants". An election of the president of a science fiction novel forum is not at all the same thing as an election of a United States President. The former is really a contest between two (or more) individual candidates (and their agendas), but the latter is actually a contest between the weak and the mighty — the well-supported candidates of a very few elites versus the grass-roots candidates of the vast multitude of non-elite people.
Simple score voting can be completely described in one short simple sentence: Give no vote at all, or from one to ten votes to any number of candidates you wish (up to some reasonable limit, say 20 candidates), and then simply add all the votes up.
It can be completely machine-free! If machines make tallying X time easier, they make coordinated rigging X times easier. Which can we truly afford???
One could say that simple score eliminates 90% of the spoiler effect. To illustrate: if a voter gives 10 votes to Nader and 9 votes to Gore, it is simply obvious that, if Nader does not win, the voter has only sacrificed exactly 10% of their voting power. Not 100% as they would have had they been forced to use the usual single-selection ("faux plurality") voting method.
No fancy math is necessary to compare and contrast it to every other option for effectiveness and simplicity, including single-selection (aka "plurality," our present "system") Condorcet, Borda, IRV, Range (with its tricky "averages"), Approval (which is not adequately discriminative), etc.
The simple score method I advocate is the very simplest, since it only allows from 1 to 10 votes to be given, not from 0 to 9, or 0 to 10. That is simply another complication. It also has no vote-averaging that seriously complicates the "range" score method. I also seem t be the only one to point out that voters should always vote artfully (aka strategically), not artlessly or heroically (aka "honestly" or "sincerely").
(Simple score is not like approval voting at all -- it is vastly more discriminative.)
PLEASE NOTE: score voting has never been used when there were truly high stakes for the voters. The single-selection method has always been utilized to spoiler effect enforced two-party or two-candidate choices. And would three money-empowered choices be better? Did Greece and Spain with their parliamentary schemes fare well with their "systems"?
And the people MUST vote strategically -- NOT artlessly ("honestly", "sincerely")! Do the Senators and judges act with honesty and sincerity? Do they vote heroicaly? Take a wild guess!
And why do you suppose they don't have just ONE money-empowered candidate or party? Something to think about?
Yeah, don't vote. That will show them. Hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens will vote in your stead. Good plan.
They already do.
you have yet to realize voting has become part of the con. voting doesn't matter, only violence matters now. that is history.
But why do they call it the "United" States?
i conducted my study in more than 200 TM club meetings during a period of three years. The result is that almost all people have nothing to say except they keep repeating what they are told by the Other (aka as MSM/Church/Gov/Parents/Advertisers.) you dont hesr anything worth hearing from them, nothing excitingly new. Why they need free speech any wsy? People do not live their lives in any genuine ways and they shit them away in their pursuit of Happiness in Konsumerism, which rightfully ends in chronicl depression.
Excellent proof!
“If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter. – George Washington
"Giving back" is a widely accepted newspeak term; a classic example of "controling the language". Any sense of pure giving is non-existent now, and the question is begged, "To whom am I giving back?".
People do not want to accept that they are part of evil system as long as they are propagandized to believe that they benefit from it even at cost to others.
Mothers sending their sons to Iraq to see them coming back as zombies without limbs, suffering PTSD, only to keep their cushy government or corporate job or retirement, is appalling and inhumane.
It is what exactly ruling class of Armani suit global gangsters has in mind, corrupting people’s souls to acquiesce and subdue them. For righteous rest there are so-called laws mild but cheap effective substitute to violence. For realists with moral backbone they have blunt violence only.
Stalin once said: if you killed your opposition you must recreate it otherwise people will create it for you.
The fact is the in our world of propaganda of fake chaos, engineered uncertainty, illusion of free choices everything is strictly controlled and planned by totalitarian global bureaucratic mafia style system fronting by figure-heads of so-called state governments which behave as medieval lords running protection/extortion rackets as national policies.
Any chime of freedom or blink of true independence is being eradicated instantly, as soon as it is realized that it is genuine, unplugged from matrix of lies, and not a stunt awaiting payoff.
It is easy to break a man by threatening those he loves. Plato tells us that in “Republic” describing how in principle the same power system reincarnates into variety of forms depending on ways citizen morals are corrupted by propaganda of power.
We are heading for collapse of civilization of human solidarity by design of ruling powers, there is nothing stopping it because horrified people suppress that fact and keep dancing on Titanic hoping for heart attack before water reaches their nose.
Many awaken up from their torpor ask in fear. What's the plan, what to do to save ourselves, our civilization, to improve our lives and return to functioning just society.
Unfortunately they themselves deny the fact that there is no plan because there is nothing to save and nowhere to return to. Those who are acutely aware of true nature of the system of control and want meaningful, deep, change know that they are not bringing cure to the system but disease that destroys it.
Agree with the main points of this article. We also addressed this topic in a podcast we released in early May called "Deciphering the Language of Lies." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMLfXoxdTLo
Good stuff.
After turning off the TV it hit me. Its a filabuster. A never ending chain yank. Keeps everyone punchy.
Stay focused on the real issues. The ones we are getting shouted down on. Focus baby. There are dozens of things they do not want to talk about.
this article is shit.
This article is the shit, i.e. excellent, in colloquial language.
Fixed it for you.
not even on top. fuck U
Fiat printing is quantitative easing. Quantitative easing is wealth creation.
Too bad James Madison is mentioned here as he owned 100 slaves at his death and never freed a slave to be able to go out and get government benefits or perhaps become college educated and earn a degree in raaaycizm.
Its not just the words they want to eliminate but the privileged white supremists behind the words as in South Africa. If whites do supremely better as a demographic in the economy, they must be shamed for doing better, and their property confiscated as in South Africa. I just heard that one of Obama's dads advocated a 99% tax rate for rich people.There's your Dreams Of his Father.
I
Welcome to the new South Africa. Obviously, you are a white imperialist. Your ancestors built this place on the broken bodies of the dark people that they raped, enslaved, and genocided. It is a miracle that any survived. It is the century of the dark people. They have thrown off the white man's shackles that kept them from creating advanced civilizations or even the rule of law throughout their histories. Pay back is a bitch. The only thing in history that really puzzles me, just why didn't the dark people sail to Europe and kick some ass before the brutal Europeans did it to them? Probably they were too peaceful to consider such an endeavor.
Cower in fear in your mansion behind your stockade, probably purchased with money you looted from dark people.
The reason they never sailed to Europe is because most of them were living a primitve tribal existence. Go and read the photoshopped books about about the Black Pharaos and other delusions. Africa is kept alive by food aid from Europe and the USA. No one is listening to your BS anymore.
so if asians do supremely better(as they are) as a demographic in the economy nothing will happen to them? dumbass. that is dumb free speech and you are welcome to appear as dumb as you like. that is america.
Asians are obviously exempt. 1. They are a minority 2. They don't have the power of "the man." 3 Calling them Asians may be microagressive.
Here's a hospital refusing to sell the local newspaper in the gift shops as they don't like how the paper covers the hospital news and UPMC is very controversial as they are a non profit that city of Pittsburgh was suing for making too much money. This even goes beyond politics.
http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com/2015/06/hospital-news-rigging-now-upmc-and.html
I keep saying news rigging has arrived and I'm sure the jounobots and the market bots can just feed off each other, 30 seconds after a big even on markets, a bot writes the story. The market bots then read that news feed and trade, then the news bots can take that story and write another article and on and on. When sophisticated programming is used to write news as to exactly how you want it via automated bots...well you get the idea.
http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com/2015/04/news-rigging-has-arrived-astroturf-and.html
For God's sakes when a hospital and a newspaper have such battles, how far will this go?
Its very clever too. Run some bs by in a constant stream and slip whatever by quick and then bruce jenner it down the memory hole. Change the subject before anyone can say boo.
Good point on the newspeak in media and politics.
Anyone that tries to alter the true meaning of words or ban the real message is a red flag to me and immediate loses all credibility. Unfortunately I am not a sheeple my life would be more simple then.
Hate crimes. A phrase plucked straight from 1984.
An excellent article which hits the right buttons and gets to the very core of what's going on today. This is 1984 by stealth.
- the "War ON Terror" is actually a "War OF Terror".
- In the UK, an "independent inquiry" is an inquiry set up by the Executive, the chairman is chosen by the Executive and the brief and scope of the inquiry is decided by the Executive. It is anything but independent.
- In the UK, a "public school" is in fact a "private school".
It goes on and on.
Good stuff; "climate change" their most important framework for suppression of liberty. Quite an apt name when you think about it.
Gee, how many murders have been committed with stars and stripes flying? Oh, I'm not supposed to mention that? Tough turkey, neocons!
Dont be talking about corruption. That girl that climbed up the flag pole? Really?
I don't know anything about flag-pole girls. I refer to everyone who killed anyone else in a war or conflict or false-flag or predator-drone attack sponsored by the USSA.
The most disturbing things is that all these things are being rolled out globally.
People see them in their own nations and may hear about them as if they only exist within their own nation, this is not the case.
1) The global youth who can no longer afford to buy their own homes
2) The PC thought police
3) Mass immigration that pushes down wages
4) Offshoring throughout the West
Who are the masterminds behind this?
as for israel
in israel you are not allowed to marry nonjews by law http://marriage.hiddush.org/
the is no muslim mass immigration to israel they are all send back or they send them to europe
there is military everywhere on the streets *to protect you*
no free speech at all in the opposit way
-in israel you cant criticize your self
-in europe you cant criticize others
recieve more money from other CUNTries (not as a loan, but billions$ for free)
secret agency is doing what they want without ant consequences
bradbury is right. huck finn, tom sawyer and every book that used the word nigger(a derivative of negro which is the spanish word for black) in the context of the time the books depict have been washed of any nigger reference. the books have lost their use as a reference for the time they were written. sam clemens can only be described in current terms as a racist for using the words so the words are expunged as if they were never used. with a certain group in charge of all media except the internet the ultimate goal will be the criminalization of any words disparaging their group(of paranoid, crazy, assholes) and you will go to jail. they have introduced explicit laws making the hurting of someone's feelings illegal regardless of facts. it will be a crime to point out the high level of violent crime in the black community just as it will be illegal to point to the statistical fact that jews are way over represented in high levels of usa .gov, wall street, the fed, the media and neocon cabal. facts do not matter; only feelings do.
the millenials have bought the whole con. they are the generation who will destroy what is left of the usa as soon as the baby boomers are gone, 20m years max.
the bottom half of the class is now an entire generation.
When i read 1984 at school it really had no relevance to me and i wondered what weirdo put it on my school reading list. Since really getting to know the internet i have realised it was an incredibly accurate description of our lives and that we are given what information the crooks want us to and everything is a charade. I'm just trying to work out where the internet fits into it all, isnt it undoing the misinformation we receive in our daily travels and why havent they declared a war on the net?
"why havent they declared a war on the net?"
Because only a small percentage of the population is interested in using the internet for research and learning.
The Internet is like a modern library of Alexandria, accessable to everyone with an internet connection.
Unfortunately, the vast majority of internet users use the internet for two things:
-Porn
-Games
So, TPTB rightly view the internet as another component of Panem et Circenses.
You can't make this stuff up!
they have declared war on the internet. why do you think they are trying to make encryption of your communication illegal? why do you think they want you to think anyone who encrypts their communication on the net a criminal engaging in criminal acts? .gov will crush the internet. do you think it is just by happenstance that the biggest social media companies are run by jews? from the aol and yahoo dinosaurs to twitter and facebook? all of have been captured in an open air prison. we are all gazans now. the reptiles are winning.
most of you have no idea there was a time in the usa when you had the constitutional right to criss cross the usa anonymously as a law abiding citizen with no right of .gov to interfere with you as long as you were a law abiding citizen. most of you expect and are willing to show your papers when asked as .gov has decided everyone is a suspect until proven otherwise
I'm probably one of the slowest people around on how they are influencing the net, however barely a day goes by where i dont find a comment about the fed, bankers, nwo etc on the net, even the radio station in my local neck of the woods has callers mentioning rothschilds etc. I agree many are oblivious to whats really happening, maybe they realise that if they cut the net off that would awaken the zombies?
Homoinfantilism swinging on a bue dese.
Why can't THEY be tolerant of MY intolerance?
Why can't THEY be tolerant of MY intolerance?
You can take your Orwell and shove it up your ASS, I'm watching Weird Al!
https://youtu.be/8Gv0H-vPoDc
we have forgotten in the usa that your feelings are your problem, not my problem.
In the case of holocaust research 6 -2.5 = 6 !
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=auschwitz+MEMORIAL+1+MILLION&biw=1097&...
Sadly, this Truth Seeker is closing shop...
http://www.globaldeflationnews.com/
http://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2015/july/1435672800/mark-mckenna/cit...
Our arsehole Australian Prime Minister... A MUST read
beware the newest insanity: micro aggression. seems like if you have a dfferent opinion than someone it's micro aggression.
refuse to tolerate intolerance!
Well the changing of language to modify psychology and behavior of people has been known and USED for a long time, Orwell wrote about it. As when the word Homosexual suddenly became "gay" when sex indicating male or female became "gender" and on and on. Who controls the media controls your mind, who controls the universities, controls your mind, who controls the education system, controls your mind, who controls the government controls your mind, UNLESS you read ZH regularly, that is the deprogramming tool!
The same group that did the homo on America and IRELAND and so forth did the rest of the job as well, you may know them as the "Banksters" or the "Bolsheviks" same team.
How and Why America was changed
Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: "American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief -- one firmly rooted in history -- that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think Gentiles will accept. Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the Jews.
Jewish groups celebrate Supreme Courts legalization of gay marriage nationwide, Jerusalem Post
Lutheran pastor says Jews to blame for destroying Christian values after US approves gay marriage, Jerusalem Post
Biden: Jewish leaders helped gay marriage succeed
“Jewish leaders in the media are in large part responsible for American acceptance of gay marriage, Vice President Biden said Tuesday night. “I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else…… I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry,” he said. “The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good."
This material, as devastating as it is to the Christian family and Christian values, needs a puzzle piece put in place for an understanding of how this Supreme Court decision was accomplished. And that puzzle piece is that the majority justices are four Jews and the swing vote that can always be counted on Jewish issues, Kennedy.
Commenting on the story above of how Jewish groups celebrated gay marriage rights in the US but not in Israel (at the same time the Jews deny human rights for the Palestinians people in Palestine), wrote GranDammer • 2 days ago
What about MY heterosexual rights not to have all those homosexual 'rights' pushed down my throat day after day, year after year, all over the place? I have to admit I'm fed up with all the prancing around at every possible opportunity by homosexual activists! Not a day has passed over the past few years without having the 'rights' of homosexuals pushed down everyone's throat at every possible opportunity all over the West and in Israel. Yes, be a homosexual if that's how you're inclined but please stop jumping around continuously showing how 'proud' you are and flaunting your sexual preferences in front of everyone, including children. I say Enough with your parades where some of you jump around half naked making gestures which should only be performed in your bedrooms. Enough is enough. As Lady Astor once declared some 100 years ago in the case of Oscar Wilde: "I don't care what he does as long as he doesn't do it in the street and frighten the horses..." Yes, do what you want in the privacy of your own homes, but leave the public places sexless so as not to frighten our children/grandchildren. I sometimes fear that one day it will be heterosexuals who will be persecuted if this homosexual raving goes on at the present pace. Who knows, perhaps the 'virtues' of homosexuality will soon be taught in our schools, God forbid.
My favorite word "race".
What is a race? What does this word conjure? A competition where only one or a few can win, while all the rest lose? This single word tugs at our subconcious desire to compete, and when used in the context of describing our fellow men and women, can only mean competing against them. Competing for what? Winning? Survival? Go team!
Therefore, the only "race" that concerns me is the race to accomplish something with my life before I ultimately run out of time, because on a long enough timeline...
"Race" : Competition
Another misnomer: "state sovereignty". At least in the US, how long has it been since any state was "sovereign" anymore? They all "lost" that natural right when Honest Abe hung that concept on the cross of economic servitude, its epitaph being written into the 17th Amendment when it was passed. Great for the railroad lobbyists at the time, now they didn't have to operate in all the state capitols to influence the state assemblies, just Washington, D.C. See how far we've come? One hundred years of centralized lobbying! One hundred years of near constant warfare... on everything.
Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four views the tribe as the victims of the government and make a tribesman the hero of those opposing the government. It therefore presents a very inaccurate view of what we see today. Maurice Bardèche's Nuremberg or the Promised Land presents a much more accurate view:
In 1949, one year after the publication of Nuremberg or the Promised Land, another prophetic book was published, George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. In it Orwell describes a scary future in which there is a single party dictatorship, living conditions are drab, food is scarce, people’s thoughts are openly controlled by Big Brother, their words and actions are monitored through “telescreens” which they cannot turn off, they are given no choice over what they view on these screens, there is only one channel on the “telescreens” and one film (always a war film) in the theatres, in one such film refugees trying to escape are shot to the delight of the audience, some of these refugees are Jewish, “the Enemy of the People” is a Jew, Emmanuel Goldstein, who is condemned for “advocating freedom of speech, freedom of the Press, freedom of assembly, freedom of thought,” people are openly taught to hate him and his followers during “Two Minutes Hate” and “Hate Week,” sex is discouraged through a “Junior Anti-Sex League,” the Inner Party is called the “Inner Party,” thoughtcrime is called “thoughtcrime,” Thought Police are called “Thought Police,” the media propagate obvious, self-contradictory lies such as: “War Is Peace,” “Freedom Is Slavery,” “Ignorance Is Strength,” people are told that democracy is “impossible” (although the Party is said to be its “guardian”), capitalism is viewed as a barbarity that has “vanished.”
The world described in 1984 little resembles that in the Occident today. We live in multi-party democracies. Our mainstream media tell us not only that democracy is possible and a very good thing, but that its triumph everywhere is virtually inevitable, an inevitability which we should make every effort to encourage. Living conditions are generally good, food is abundant. Capitalism is alive and well and is promoted as an economic panacea. Our politicians advocate the same things as does Emmanuel Goldstein. Our media propagate obvious lies such as: “Diversity is our strength,” but they at least avoid flagrant self-contradictions (some kinds of diversity may indeed be a source of strength, although certainly not the radical ethnic diversity that our media promote). Refugees do not flee our societies, but rather risk their lives trying to get into them. We are not taught to hate, but to tolerate. Sex is not generally discouraged, even among the young. With our multi-channel televisions and the internet we are free to see, hear, read, and discuss almost anything, if not everywhere. Freedom reigns. Yet to some that freedom seems, if not illusory, useless. It is useless because people’s thoughts and actions are monitored and controlled not by anything outside themselves but by their own warped consciences, consciences deliberately warped by our mainstream media, consciences closely resembling Bardèche’s “universal conscience.”
Orwell’s and Bardèche’s books have had quite different careers in the Occident. Orwell’s, although formerly banned in the Soviet Union, has been widely read and praised; Bardèche’s is still banned in France and is generally unknown elsewhere. 1984 has served to warn us against the dangers of Communism, and for that deserves acclaim. But one cannot help but wonder if its general acclaim today is not also an index to its irrelevance. We have escaped the dreadful future envisioned by Orwell in 1984. We have not escaped the dreadful future envisioned by Bardèche in 1948.
Bardèche’s book is a classic. It is of interest today primarily because of what it says about the future. Throughout the first three quarters of the book the discussion of the trial is interlaced with somber warnings and ominous admonitions to the reader: “One is proposing a future to us, one does so by condemning the past. It is into this future also that we want to see clearly. It is these principles that we would like to look at directly. For we already foresee that these new ethics refer to a strange universe, a universe with something sick about it, an elastic universe where our eyes no longer recognize things.”
Bardèche has examined the transcript of the Nuremberg Trial and now, like an ancient prophet after examining the entrails of a sacrifice, he has bad news to deliver and knows that others will not want to hear him. Indeed, very few have been willing to hear him. The last quarter of the book is devoted entirely to an exposition of what the future will bring. That anyone in 1948 could have foreseen so accurately our modern world is to me astounding. Bardèche recognized that the judicial travesty at Nuremberg was not simply an act of vengeance by victors against the vanquished and that what was on trial there was not just the particular German defendants, nor the German nation, nor even National Socialism, but rather nationalism itself: the idea that a people own the land that they have long lived in and have the right to live in it as they wish and to exclude others from living in it if they so wish. It is nationalism in any form which was condemned at Nuremberg.
With amazing prescience Bardèche foresaw in its condemnation the coming of an international system which is first and foremost economic, not political or governmental. Its purpose is to protect an international economic élite, not ordinary persons, or peoples or nations. It offers the latter lots of rights but no guarantees that these rights will be respected. Its laws are unclear (unlike those of a prince) and broadly unenforceable, but the system does not attempt to enforce them broadly but only selectively. For selected victims punishments are severe. Victims are selected not so much because they have broken laws but because they have offended the “universal conscience,” the conscience created and fostered in us all by the media (Bardèche’s “radio”). Bardèche clearly foresaw the system which we today call “globalism,” although he nowhere uses that term. He also foresaw at least implicitly many other aspects of our world: Third World immigration, the irrational glorification of democracy, loss of sovereignty, humanitarian wars and interference, hate crimes, affirmative action, racial miscegenation and replacement, etc.: “At the bottom of the sanctuary there sits a Negro god. You have all the rights, except to speak evil of the god.” “And, from one end of the world to the other, in perfectly similar cities . . . there will live under similar laws a bastard population, a race of indefinable and gloomy slaves, without genius, without instinct, without voice. . . But this will be the promised land.”
http://www.lulu.com/shop/search.ep?keyWords=nuremberg+or+the+promised+land&type=
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/07/maurice-bardeches-vision-of-the-future-part-1/
I think censorship is good. It makes you not say bad things that will hurt other people's feelings. For example, I don't use the word h*story any longer because it might hurt a woman's feelings. I use the word "past," like I studied American Past last night for my test today. And, I am working hard to ban the word "citizen" because non-citizens of the town or this country might think it is a hurtful word. I have signed petitions to ban speech and symbols in town because I don't think people should say crazy things or have to look at something offensive. I successfully lead the committee to remove the statue of the man in front of the high school because he was a theif. He was accused of stealing horses. I don't think teenagers should have to walk by a statue of a criminal every day, even if he was reponsible for bringing a lot of capital and many jobs to the town. Someone has to protect young minds and I think I was put on this earth to do just that. We need to be more civilized and watch what we say and do. That will make everyone happier. If we stopped being angry and saying bad things, we would have so much more free time to do the things we really love, like sit under a tree and paint. We could all raise puppies on puppy farms humanely and give each child a puppy too. That will keep everyone happy.