This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
For The First Time Since It Was Mexico, California Now Has More Latinos Than Whites
Two weeks ago, we highlighted a statistic that reflects the rapid demographic shift taking place in America. Non-Hispanic whites, Bloomberg reported, citing the Census Bureau, are no longer the majority in Americans under 5 years old.
Why does this matter or, perhaps more to the point, why do we mention it here? Because demographic shifts often have far-reaching consequences for the economy. Here’s what we said last month:
Shifting demographics are affecting everything from the labor market, to homeownership, to race relations in America.
In “The ‘Illegal Immigrant’ Recovery” for instance, we documented the stunning fact that the US has added 2.3 million "foreign-born" workers, offset by just 727K "native-born" since December 2007. Because the "foreign-born" category includes both legal and illegal immigrants, it may well be that the surprise answer why America's labor productivity has plummeted in recent years and certainly months, and why wage growth has gone precisely nowhere, is because the vast majority of all jobs since December 2007, or 75% to be specific, have gone to foreign-born workers.
As for the housing market, we recently cited data from the Urban Institute which shows that because the vast majority of new households in the next decade will be formed by minorities, and because minority groups tend to have lower homeownership rates, the overall homeownership rate in America — which has already retraced twenty years' worth of gains — will likely slide further in the coming years.
These are but two examples of how much demographic shifts matter. Against this backdrop we present the following chart and brief commentary from the LA Times with no further comment:
The shift shouldn't come as a surprise. State demographers had previously expected the change to occur sometime in 2013, but slow population growth pushed back projections. In January 2014, the state Department of Finance estimated the shift would take place at some point in March.
Either way, the moment has officially arrived.
"This is sort of the official statistical recognition of something that has been underway for almost an entire generation," said Roberto Suro, director of the Tomás Rivera Policy Institute at USC.
California is now the first large state and the third overall — after Hawaii and New Mexico — without a white plurality, according to state officials.
"Where L.A. goes is where the rest of the state goes and where the rest of the country goes," he said. "We announce, demographically speaking, the future for the rest of the country."
»
- 33309 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
California was never mexico.
My best friend's ex-wife makes $75/hr on the laptop. She has been unemployed for eight months but last month her income with big fat bonus was over $15000 just working on the laptop for a few hours.
Read more on this site... www.earnmore9.com
Mexico can annex them as far as I care, just as long as they take the scumbag Caucasian traitor filth that allowed that to happen.
YT is at war with himself and it's going to get ugly.
Welcome to the Hotel Mexifornia.
Asians will soon outnumber the Mexicans. Soon thereafter Moslems will outnumber everyone.
and notice also please how that the restaurants, they are pricing the menus now in the peso and not of the amero
coincidence?
I don't think that is so!
hugs,
a tsipras
at 16 pesos/dollar and rising, all those retirees who migrated to Mexico are going to run back here illegally!
California has never been amenable to the Caucasian race, too much sun, too little water, too expensive real estate.
anyone notice the spike in melanoma rates in CA over the past 20 yrs.? it's not happening to residents with too much melanin. jus sayin.
Cuba looks better every day...
Hard to beleive how fast Mexicans and Muslims reproduce; even faster then some of our own home grown precious peoples.
The ignorance of Americans is astonishing. The vast majority of so-called Latinos are Mestizo. Mestizos are not the "natives" of the Americas; these men and women are half-European in origin. They did not exist prior to European (or "white") men arriving in the Americas.
Ergo, Latinos are much more closely linked to you, both culturally and biologically, than you appear to realize. Your ignorance of this seems to be one of the many tragic consequences of an abysmal American educational system.
As an historian, I have to say this is something that has bugged me since the latter part of my undergrad days. I think the reason for the "Latino" connotation was to use a PC term, just like the AP now discourages the use of Illegal Immigrant.
If someone wants to get really formal the term "Hispanic", which is thrown around with reckless abandon, was actually first used to describe a person who had ancestral heritage to Hispaniola or Spain. The reasoning at the time was that true "Hispanics" were of a higher social class than the mixed races in South America.
Correct. This is one of many reasons why I find White Supremacy's hysterics about the "end of the white race" utterly baffling. At this point in history, European genetics have become so widespread across many parts of the world that long-term survival is all but assured. The unhealthy obsession that White Supremacists have with appearance & skin tone is wholly disconnnected from reality.
Since you're a professional historian, consider this point in case: The historic Viking chieftain, Rollo, founded Normandy in the north of France about a 1000 years ago, and he and his men came to wed local Christian women. Their children, known as "Normans", were not fully Nordic but an ethnically mixed group that had Celtic as well as Romanic heritage through their mothers (due to France its previous history as a Roman province). Many of the Normans became foreign participants in the Reconquista in Iberia on the Saracens, and several of these Normans came to wed with local Iberian women. Fast forward time again, and the descendants of those Normans are seen to take part in the Spanish Empire's colonizing of southern America, with some of them, again, in turn becoming fathers to Mestizo children.
In other words, even though it could not be guessed merely by judging the physical appearance of such a Mestizo man or woman, there exists a direct, unbroken line of ancestry through father's side to Scandinavia and the Vikings within that person. This scenario is but one such example I could give. The right-wing is so disconnected from biological reality in matters as these, their ideas and arguments are comparable to Creationism in terms of ignorance and absurdity.
Who cares. AFAIC anyone not white is either a nigger, spic, wog or chink.
Ya can take the Mexican outta California but ya can't take him out for long.
This site is a study in schizophrenia. Libertarians who want to be left alone. Go fuck government and collectivism and all of that. But why isn't the government and/or the collective federal border patrol keeping these undesirables off my lawn!
I think you left out the part about the pot of welfare at the end of the immigration rainbow. I think that would change your schizophrenia equation. But I'm sure that was just an accident.
Read the tenor of most comments here and tell me that is the issue. But I'm sure you ignoring that was just an accident.
I throw me corn, me no call no fowl;
I saying, "Cuk-cuk-cuk, cluk-cluk-cluk."
Read the tenor of most comments here and tell me that is the issue. But I'm sure you ignoring that was just an accident.
You're the schizophrenic one, insisting that someone you've identified as a libertarian isn't paying attention to popular opinion. It's you, as a progressive statist who is obsessed with public opinion and how it can be manipulated. But some of us simply look to principle and not pandering.
Don't think that it's gone unnoticed that you evaded WVI's point about immigration in a welfare state. You simply don't have the wit or fortitude to reply directly to a thoughtful argument.
And once again I'm left wondering why you hang around a place you hate so much. More progressive schizophrenia I suppose.
Love the place. Hate some of the self-righteous, hypocrtical unemployed posters, Billy.
It's been less that a week since you called Tyler a hypocrite. Drinking a man's beer and then pissing on his rug is not an act of love.
Billy, calling a spade a spade is an act of love.
Plus this is FC and I'm sure the Tyler's have nice thick skins.
LTER has convictions and states them unequivocally and has for a long time.
LTER has avoided rational argument for as long as he's been here. You will note that he still hasn't answered WVI's point that open borders and the welfare state is an unworkable combination.
LTER specializes in the ad hominem attack. He does not express his own principles or try to explain his position. He is almost exclusively interested in antagonizing those who promote self determination. He will not discuss the issues honestly and always deflects the augment.
And what do you mean by "calling a spade a spade?"
If a Tyler is being hypocritical and called out for the same? Spade = Spade?
Heck, it's not as if the Tyler's are some kind of godmen Billy, they run a website we all love.
That is it.
You seem attached to some unreal-ity of worshipful-ness....perhaps a result of your new-be-ness here. All good...
If a Tyler is being hypocritical and called out for the same? Spade = Spade?
So you don't even know what the issue was but you insist that LTER was simply "calling a spade a spade?" Does he wipe your nose and cut your meat for you too?
You seem attached to some unreal-ity of worshipful-ness....perhaps a result of your new-be-ness here. All good..
I've been here for over five years. So by your criteria that new members are wrong and old members are right you must now concede that I am right. Unless you're one of those hypocrite spades.
Fair enough, I have no way of knowing you are a booted off name-changed returnee. Your profile says 37 weeks.
That said, I'm talking about observing LTER's battle with faux libertarians for a long time.
Many gun-grabbing libbys here want the gubbment to do JUST what THEY consider enough.
Sliding scale libertarian wannabes who come off as alternately churlish or angry for the most part hate LTER calling a spade a spade.
Over and over.
Anyways, having lived in California for 7 + years, I can say with some confidence that when the time comes, it's going to go like a bomb......
you are a booted off name-changed returnee.
I used to post under the name of my blog, CrockettAlmanac. I dropped the blog and so I got a new handle. Do you always jump to the wrong conclusion?
Sometimes I do, in this case an easy assumption to make, no?
You can un-twist your knickers now.
I remember CroAlmanac very well...
Keep out of my knickers, I'm a libertarian, damn it!
;-)
I, for one, will go on record that I appreciate LTER, Billy (CrockettAlmanac), and ORI's comments here.
And, for the record, your previous monikers notwithstanding.
I like Ori, LTER, and Billy, too! Never downvote any of them. The place wouldn't be the same without them. I may be schizoid. I am a Libertarian-Statist.
My favorite part is when certain folks build decrepit strawmen to knock them down and ride off with dreams of glory and singing about the lovely Dulcinea.
Crockett!!!
Hey, dude. How are you this evening? I'm just about ready to make a sandwich and watch Peckinpah's Ride the High Country for the first time. Do I dare admit that I got the DVD from the public library? Does that make me a libertarian-statist or simply an individual trying to recoup tax money pilfered from me against my will? I don't know but I love a good movie and Peckinpah knows how to make 'em.
I am doing well.
He does! Have only seen one of his flicks and that was way back in a class, History of American Film.
Good plan on library movies. I would borrow music and copy, but I am into too obscure and flaky stuff. They have little I want in music, except for classical. I listen to Pandora a lot.
Was accused of being a statist troll the other day! I am a Buchanan conservative with libertarian leanings. You probably recall, since we visited here in the past. Not sure why I thought you were from down South.
I am taking a new job and may be scarce around here, again. Maybe drop in on weekends.
Hope to hear how your Yaupon does. Found it on an old list of woody plants I wanted to try. Has great landscape value besides the surprising caffeine content.
Be well.
Billy, I don't know much from a first-hand experience about the US or why Mexicans want to immigrate
I just know that here in Europe, we don't get immigrants because of the "pot of gold aka social spending" waiting for them
they mostly come for... jobs. to work. and they flee their countries because they are war- and violence-infested hell-holes
like Somalia, like Syria, like a lot of recently destabilized countries
how would Mexico look like if that never-ending "War on Drugs" would stop, I wonder?
Another good reason to eliminate government.
You will note that he still hasn't answered WVI's point that open borders and the welfare state is an unworkable combination.
Probably because it's immaterial to what LTER was observing.
On the contrary. LTER misunderstood the logical reasons to oppose open immigration in a welfare state. Therefore he accused those who have such concerns of being schizophrenic. It is his ad hominem attack which is irrelevant..
Perhaps you'd like to tell us why you think that a welfare state with open borders is a long term viable system.
It's not, and that's why their silence (e.g., LTER, James Cole, and their ilk) is deafening.
As Gandalf said to the trolls, "Dawn take you all, and be stone to you!" Of course LTER is the real troll while Cole is just a confused and annoying liberal like I used to be.
Oh, I don't know Crockett I think your still Liberal just not a "progressive"-liberal, which makes you libertarian instead of a cloaked socialist desiring unlimited illegal immigration, with the state paying (meaning higher taxes) for their room & board in order to garner political patronage and power from the it.
At some point we're going to have to reclaim the word and meaning of Liberal, laissez-faire and a host of other things, until then Libertarian works ;-)
I'm an anarcho-capitaist, dude (free at last, free at last...). Government is a criminal exercise plain and simple.
Your point about the definition of "liberal" is understood and I join you in decrying the death of language. Degradation of language and manipulation of word meanings is a key part of the social engineering being undertaken by our government and media.
LTER misunderstood the logical reasons to oppose open immigration in a welfare state. Therefore he accused those who have such concerns of being schizophrenic.
No, he made a general point that he's made many times, libertarians talk a lot about how government needs to stay out of ABC and be very involved with XYZ. i.e. no different than typical liberals except for what their pet issues are.
You responded with a separate argument and set the bounds so that it's something most people would agree is common sense, and then claimed that if your particular argument is true it implies LTERs entire premise is false. When your argument doesn't apply.
Is open immigration in a welfare state problematic? Yes. Does that contradict the observation that many 'libertarians' on here frequently cry for strong government intervention in a variety of societal areas and are hence annoyingly hypocritical? No.
Libertarians believe that government has a necessary but limited role defined by the Constitution.
Article IV, Section 4"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
Unless you can explain why it is hypocritical for an individual to support Constitutional law (as libertarians do) and then request that the law be followed according to the Constitution (such as in Article IV, Section 4) then LTER's premise is clearly false.
For Fight Club, it's remarkably easy for any thread to devolving into a pissing contest over the supposed idealogically purity of your opponents. You just have to know what button to press with who (and press it, if you have a mind to).
LTER;
Fuck you! Your comments have almost always been pointed to the hypocritical, self righteous Liberal Shit-no-Crat side of your foul smelling side of the fence.
I'm going to go make you a hot lunch and leave you a napkin now..........LTER.
Whoops, is that considered feeding the troll? Literally......
LTER is not a troll. We may as well be in an echo chamber without his contrarian points of view.
LTER consistently attacks others but offers few solutions himself. He insists that individuals can't be free without an elite class to protect the public from the elite class but he never explains how or why that would work. He never says which politicians he supports and so he makes himself unassailable while he attacks others who do make their positions known.
Therefore he is a troll.
Unrestricted immigration really worked out well for the Native American Indians
that's called a straw-man argument, LTER.
a dishonest person uses that type of chicanery to attempt to put words in other peoples' mouths that they really are not saying.
real libertarians do not support government doing anything.
i'm perfectly capable of defending my own lawn, just so long as gov backs off and doesn't interfere with the justice i need to dispense on my own property.
"real libertarians do not support government doing anything."
Don't know which Libertarians you might be talking about, but from what I know, most support the proper functions of government, and that includes law enforcement.
Protecting the integrity of borders and enforcing immigration laws fits squarely into that class, while redistribution of wealth via the welfare state does not.
And LTER, what's schizophrenic about that?.
You're correct but there is a spectrum of political thought amongst individualists. If I had to define myself (which is generally a useless, collectivist exercise, but what the hell) then I'm a voluntaryist. But depending on the paradigm being discussed I can relate as a libertarian or anarcho-capitalist.
The key point for me is that individuals own themselves. Start from that premise, proceed logically and you can't go wrong.
correct. they don't own only themselves. they own the... state. like in "own up your own shit"
something a lot of voluntarysts I have met here have some difficulties with, or so it seems to me
The state and volutariysm are diametrically opposed positions. You don't seem to have a clue about the subject.
And what does your opinion of some other people you met have to do with me? "I met some people who were like you and they were silly so you are silly too," is not a cogent argument.
Voluntaryists believe that the only moral interactions are consensual. If you disagree explain why.
Libertarians who want to be left alone.
What do you think is inconsistent between libertarianism and wanting to build a giant ass wall around the country, ID everyone + kick out undesirables, outlaw abortions, science and anything else inconsistent with the countries core christian values, make teaching the bible in school mandatory and then drop nukes all over the middle east. Freedom motherfucker, learn what it means! Trump gets it, the man is so committed to liberty he's willing to trash his brand so bad he might face bankruptcy for the nth time! That's an american hero right there!
Love you, man.
Get a chat room, you two.
You really didn't just try to equate Libertarians to, dropping nukes all over the ME (which has never happened) outlawing abortions, science, building up a giant police state while banning (theres that word again, banning something) any mention or discussion of Christian values within the confines of the monopolistic-atheistic-socialist indoctrination camps commonly called government-run public schools did you?
How very "progressive" of you ;-)
Jeez,
You would think people who have such a rich fantasy life would be able to be a little more creative and less ham-fisted in presenting their fictional world view to others.
It has not yet sunk in that borders are imaginary....kinda like the square root of a negative number.
For Cole and LTER anything including borders can be considered to be either real or imaginary depending on how much wealth can be pilfered from productive individuals at any given time. They celebrate transreality as the confusion it causes makes theft so much easier.
Libertarians who want to be left alone. Go fuck government and collectivism and all of that. But why isn't the government and/or the collective federal border patrol keeping these undesirables off my lawn!
When they're sucking up tax dollars, funneling money OUT of the local economy in remittances, destroying the social services system for those who pay the most into it, etc, I think it's understandable the beef we have with illegals. The FED couldn't do what it has done without the available cheap labor from Mexico and South America. Wage inflation would have prevented the income stratification. As a life long SoCal resident whose seem the havoc wrought by unchecked immigration of Hispanic and Asian people/cultures, I can say it has in no way served the interests of the American citizens in my neck of the woods. If governmnet has any purpose at all it should be to defend borders and all that that entails.
Funny thing is that I agree with you. And we need collective action to implement this defense.
You're using the word "collective" to re-enforce your world view where it isn't necessary. If the rule of law is made to be followed then every Sherrif in the nation would be responsible and held accountable for the deportation of illegals. A decentralized approach would allow some places to arrest. Perhaps others would offer some voluntary deportation incentives. Even otherts might enforce tarrifs on legitimate vistors from neighboring Mexican towns to economically deal with the problem. Decentralization and the competition of ideas FTW!
Funny thing is that I agree with you. And we need collective action to implement this defense
The collectivist system you desire has been in place for centuries. It's called government. It bombs innocent people for their freedom and redistributes wealth to the elites for the public good. It takes away the rights of individuals because all individuals are suspected terrorists while it gives money and arms to actual terrorists. The list of benefits goes on and on. You should be so pleased.
You are confusing libertarianism/free market with anarchy. Libertarianism/free market still requires LIMITED government (incl. border patrol)
An Anarchist society would have border patrols as well. Local associations would make free decisions to band together to protect property and infrastructure. Only in this sick demented government by and for the Oligarchy are the wealthy's assets, jobs and interests protected at the expense of the rest of us!
This would explain why the tamales are so much better than they used to be. Same with the fish tacos. Better beer, too.
Do I need to remind you?
lol
They can have Louisianna too.
So what's the problem? A moderately well-off person can live like a sultan in Old Mexico. Shouldn't middle-class America be agitating for such a change?
Well, technically it was... for 27 years. mea culpa. Look a mexican blue state is an answer to the blue state problem. The mexicans ain't going to foot the bill for the FREE SHIT BARACK ARMY. They have no "White Guilt."
It's game over mang!
Americas fufture is brazil, a whiter productive class that is fleeced to support the Marxist underclass.
Gonna look a lot like Elysium-- without the LEO station.
Until both are chucked overboard in favor of robots
The robots are coming
http://www.dailymercury.com.au/news/robots-to-pick-fruit-and-drive-tract...
Alta California became a part of Mexico in 1821 following its successful war for independence, but was ceded to the United States in 1848 after the Mexican–American War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California
already covered that...
WRONG. Only a fraction of the land was ceded. Maximilian SOLD the rest to the US government for gold. He even offered the US representative the Baja peninsula for peanuts, but he balked. The man was no wheeler-dealer, that's for sure! Oh, the taxes California could be collecting on all that prime land.
FOWARD LA RAZA AND AZTECA !!!
Indeed, that is exactly what IS coming....all those latino gangs.....not good...
Aztlan, actually:
They have the vote - SoCal can leave the Union if they want to.
There won't be enough Fresh Water, so they'll have to recycle and/or desalinate; but figure LA/ORANGE/SAN DIEGO Counties breaking off...
With the Military out and the Entertainment most likely to stay, guess they're going to make it into a Tourism Paradise?
Another thick Yank never did history at school.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alta_California
But don't worry, you will be history soon enough.
As a white minority I want my Obamaphone, free healthcare, and an EBT card that gives me cash back at my local dive bar ATM.
Unfortunately, you can't have it, because you're white.
It's not going to be about white/non-white there anymore.
It's going to be about Hispanic/non-Hispanic.
The Indians (mostly Sikhs) in CA have a fuel collective that allows their members to undercut hispanic drivers and take all their business. Only a matter of time before the government of Mexifornia cracks down on that. If they're too stupid to compete, they get the goverment to fuck with you.
truth, the Sikhs have the car rental business in CA locked up completely due to this and other tactics...
Sikhs have been called the "Jews" of India. They were a fierce warrior class of ancient India. They have kriyas in Kundalini Yoga that are solely for advancement in the material world. Their religion, like the Jewish faith, seems to codify an implicit superiority achieved thru accumulation of material wealth. Paradoxically, Kundalini Yoga has strong Buddhist overtones.
+1
agree with everything you said, except the word "paradoxically"
material wealth and spiritual wealth are not at all opposed, in fact, they support each other.
the sikh ashram i studied kundalini yoga at, back in the day, was in a rural agricultural area in western massachusetts. the people at the ashram were quality people, not at all materialistic, focused on spiritual growth.
one of the companies i sell to now are run by sikhs, they are top notch, honest, trustworthy, straightforward, no games or gimmicks, and i can make good money selling to them. they are all about business.
The only thing you will receive for being a white minority is disdain. Non whites have been told to hate white people and blame them for everything so expect to never get benefits for being a minority. Expect them to destroy all your cultural remnants as well:
Yen Cross: As a white minority I want my Obamaphone, free healthcare, and an EBT card that gives me cash back at my local dive bar ATM.
I'm still looking for my "White Privilege"............... I can't fucking find it anywhere.
I was supposedly born with it... but I’ve never seen it. Must be where that missing sock is when I last took the laundry from my dryer... dunno...
As a white guy who has driven accross the continetal US on a motorcycle on more that one occasion I can assure you that it is still good to be a honky.
Nonsense.
Your white priviledge is staring you in the face everytime you pay taxes to support border jumpers and the other dregs of society.
You can also see it as decent working class communities are turned into crime infested hellhole ghettos of vibrancy and cultural diversity.
And there it goes...You gotta look quick because it doesn't take long at all.
OH but how about latinos who are white and of European origin? The only difference is their language.
Only if they shoot a black guy.
No Mediterranean europeans are different from northern Europeans.
Race ie genetics matter and it's more than just skin color.
So what about Italians in northern Italy who speak German? Are they part of the master race or not?
"Master race," stop with your bullshit strawman. Yes northern Italians are different(higher iqs) than southern Italians.
Thanks for sorting that out. Much of Russia is north of Germany. Are they all of higher IQ lower IQ or the same?
Overall, they'd be average IQ, same as anywhere else.
(Same as anywhere else) no, that's very wrong.
Correct. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together can determine who has the higher IQs by human progress.
Chinese invented gunpowder, Euros made them into guns and conquered the world, besides the fact that they were only a small fraction of the world's population. Then, because of a superiority complex, decided to "share" advancements, technology, and civil rights with everyone else. What happened when guns went to Africa, where people were still living in mud huts? Africans immediately initiated a genocide that continues to this day. What happened when guns were introduced to the indigenous population of loincloth-wearing jungle warriors in the Americas? They immediately started killing each other.
Unfortunately, some whites (on a regional basis) wanted to assert their perceived superiority over other whites and started world wars, all the time telling the low foreheads to "stay out of it". Whites killing each other over who was superior. There lies the weakness. Without this global pissing match, the population of whites would be significantly higher.
The civilized white countries could have been (and still could be) destroyed by tensions between white Euopeans/Americans and white Russians. STOP THE MADNESS! A nuke-ular war would set the evolutionary process of the world back centuries. It would take hundreds of years to get back to where we are today because most of the people left on earth would have an IQ of well below 100, at least in the immediate aftermath.
Whites just seem hell-bent on self-destruction. Just look at that dickhead Germanwings pilot. I won't even go into the whole suicidal "multiculturalism" bullshit...
Incorrect. IQ is set at AVERAGE ingelligence for a population e.g. normal is 100. Then there are variations within that population, super intellects, normals, morons, politicians, and president/congressmen.
Take all poplulations, set at the norm of 100 IQ, and all have same bell curve (and the same fucking politicians/presidents/leaders).
Whites are not superior in any way unless you want to say that our politicians/congressmen/presidents/leaders are so sub-par that it totally outweighs every other super intellect in our midst.
Eastern European Slavs have a lower avg iq, they are more inbred and have a hard time creating a high trust society. (Finns excluded), unlike Western Europe which beneifeted by anti-consanguinity laws.
You probably know all this and you are just trying to be an ass.
No. I just appreciate the great education you are giving me.
I doubt that very much.
Everything Waffen has said is consistent with "The History and Geography of Human Genes" by L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza.
I am not sure why you are getting all the down votes. Maybe the "inbred" comment, that I cannot yet confirm. Other than that comment, all your other statements are in order.
It is unfortunate that agenda driven types mistake unpleasant facts for racism.
From "The History and Geography of Human Genes" by L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza, professor emeritus Stanford University.
The highest IQs, besides Ashkenazi Jews, are in extreme east Asia. The highest Jewish IQs are Ashkenazi Jews with some Alpine ancestry.
The highest European IQs are roughly centered in Bavaria and the Alps. IQs go down only a point or two into the British Isles, Scandinavia, France, and the Iberian peninsula. Further east, IQs are several points lower and continue to drop. Same for IQs to the south. Middle Eastern IQs are 10 points or more lower than European IQs. Israeli IQs are at a midpoint between European and middle Eastern. North African IQs are similar to middle Eastern IQs with Berber populations having slightly higher IQs. Sub-Saharan IQs are quite low.
Yes they are cause the "master race" over threw the Roman Empire and took most of the Italian peninsula. Where do you think names like Lombardy come from? THE LOMBARDES aka a germanic tribe that took northern Italy....by force.
Hey Waffen,
How do you go about identifying what "race" a person belongs to?
Why don't you ask "La Raza"...?
There is a lot of diversity within races. Talking in general terms I refer to white people as those of traditional european decent, ofcourse there would be exceptions within this, people wih a lot of african or Arab admixture from 100s or even a 1000 years ago which I would not consider "white."
It's not hard to identify a white person which is why it's a useful term.
Simples Hohum
You shout , hey nigga, and if he growls and starts chasing you, he's african americano.s/c
My wife's cousin's grandaughter has brown skin but is meticulous, organized and a model student like her German grandparent. Does she qualify as acceptable?
Does she earning $9000 a week working from home?
I'm a sheep herder. I replaced all my collies with pit-bulls. How is my flock going to do?
I'm a duck hunter. I replaced all my retrievers with bull-terriers. How's my hunting going to work out?
There is such thing as genetically determined behavior. It applies to humans as well. Get over it.
In other news, The National Association for the Advancement of Chihuahuas has filed a lawsuit in NY District Court against the Police K-9 Unit, "citing Disparate Impact".
Ok.
That's funny.
In today's world, that's a lawsuit that needs to be filed just to prove how ridiculous all the rest of the bullshit really is.
The social welfare state will collapse from the weight of handouts. Great to hear, let the liberals bask in their own ignorance.
http://www.cheatsheet.com/business/10-states-most-dependent-on-the-feder...
Hate to bbreak it to you, Skippy, but Red States are the ones most dependent on Federal aid.
Fail. Again. As expected.
And the blue states have the greatest insolvency? Or that they have the greatest income equality?
Yeah you are an idiot.
Yo Czar Dickless - Minus out the Military base costs and the picture changes dramtically. But to a sociopath, math don't matter.
Hands Up ! Don't Think!
"minus out the military base costs" cuz a socialized and subsidized military is not a burden on the taxpayer... not at all.
you've obviously never met anyone in the military, or asked about how 'entitled' they feel to their benefits. never deployed and want to retire at 38? sure! we gotcha back forever, battle buddy!
Then let them go find some agua for the state.
Kalifornia... Soon to be the South Africa of the Northern Hemisphere.
Unspoiled beaches vs South LA?
I'd take the trade and advocate for monority status...down there ;-)
....don't know if it's true or not but in Ann Coulters new book, she states that 1/4 of Mexico's population has moved into CONUS in the last 15 years.
Not true. They just fuck alot once they cross the border. If she were right that would mean at least 25 million Mexican migrants since the year 2000.
That number might just hold water if you count the ones that returned on their own and/or we tossed back (for whatever the reason) and then they turn around and come back across the border at a future point of their choosing. A shit ton of them went back when the housing construction tanked, for example, and then they all piled back in when Oblunder promised amnesty.
Do the Math ... of course its true.
I think she is low on that estimate.
I'd like to know how many latinos in the US don't even speak Spanish because they've been integrated into the culture for so many generations.
It seems like 2nd generation US born Latinos start losing their native tongue. And actually, most of the latter generations are pretty decent citizens. It's the immigrants and their children that suck. They ruined their state and now they're bringing it to Cali with them. I'm not being racist. You can drive through neighborhoods and can instantly tell where the white/mixed houses end and where the Mexican houses start. The yards look like hell, there is a couple of nasty little chihuahuas barking at everyone, a primed 1987 camaro broke down, peeling paint on the house and some thugs sitting on the sidewalk in wife beaters drinking coors light.
Isn't that because the mexicans are busy fixing whitey's yard leaving them little time to do their own?
haha what you are describing sounds just like my Eastern European ancestors who came over in 1906, as seen by my Yankee ancestors in the 1960s. except the chihuahuas, and the cars were older. I think people are assimilating faster than they did in former generations.
Ah yes, but there are plenty of Mexican Americans who consider themselves white. If you are from Spain arent you white???
Some of them may be "white," but most immigrants from Mexico the last few decades are most defiantly not "white." Even with that said Anglos and germanics are very different from Italian, Spanish and Greek.
Dude - Seriously... are you that feckin' stupid? The "white" Mexicans live in Mexico and are happy to have the Meztizos get illegal entry into the US. The illegals no longer rob them on the streets, they repatriate a lot of the USDs to relatives in Mexico ... its a win win for them. Not so much for th taxpayers and wage earners in the US.
When they drop the hyphen shit, then I might think of them as being one of us.
As in Camilla Parker-Bowles, Buster?
Uh, she's British, not American, dumbass.
Actually her family was French Canadian and was infiltrated by a British Govt. dork in the waybacks.
We shared a grandma about 11 generations ago.
Mrs. Windsor is a fugly cousin of mine. Some family branches just turn bad. Hillary's went bad with an American.
I wanted some gunfighters or cattle rustlers in the family for a little color but all I got were Govt. crooks.
Geneology can be very disappointing.
Mexicans have done a wonderful job south of the boarder why not figure the'll do the same to LA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_10_in_California#/media/File:I1...
So now will it be
Press one for Spanish?
You meant "Pulse 1 para Ingles".
Start a referendum for Mexico to take back California.
Mexico can have Hollywood and Jerry Brown.
Alta California
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alta_California
I loved Los Angeles in the 1980s...Motley crue, Ratt, LA Guns concerts were full of big tittied blondes and endless drugs.....those were the days.