This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Hillary Clinton Explains Her Leftist Framework For A "Fairer" Economy - Live Feed
Hillary Clinton is set to deliver her first economic policy speech in what is sure to be wonderfully leftist 'fair and balanced' populist attack on her financial backers (the banks) in favor of her minions (everyday Americans). The somewhat confusing leaks about the speech suggest growth through tax cuts for small business and government infrastructure spending which would be funded by higher taxes on the wealthy (small businesses) and minimuj wage hikes (ouch small businesses). Grab your popcorn (and the inflight vomit bag) and enjoy...
Clinton speaks...
As The Wall Street Journal reports,
Hillary Clinton is preparing to lay out an economic plan that seeks a center-left ideological course, rejecting ideas put forth by Republican presidential contenders but striking a contrast with her party’s liberal wing.
In an economic speech Monday, the Democratic presidential front-runner will focus on her differences with Republican rivals. She will accuse them of seeking growth without regard to whether the middle class thrives, and say that raising incomes for all Americans is “the defining economic challenge of our time,” a campaign aide said.
But the speech in New York City will also draw implicit contrasts with Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who is mounting a strong challenge from the left for the nomination. He is focusing heavily on inequality, arguing that the economic pie should be divided more fairly and calling for taxes on the wealthy to pay for initiatives to aid the middle class.
Mrs. Clinton will put relatively more emphasis on the need to make the pie larger. Her economic policy advisers say she aims to walk a course between a focus on inequality and one on growth.
This balancing act reflects her broader approach to policy so far in her presidential quest. She is proving to be quite liberal in some areas—particularly social policy such as immigration, gay marriage and gun control—while centrist on other issues, including some economic ones.
To promote growth, Mrs. Clinton will urge tax cuts for small businesses and new government spending on infrastructure, the aide said. She also will propose ways to make it easier for women to succeed in the workplace, including support for child care and paid leave.
To address income inequality, Mrs. Clinton will call for raising the minimum wage, increasing taxes on the wealthy, boosting the power of unions and reducing health-care costs. She also is likely to propose some new rules governing Wall Street.
* * *
»
- 16316 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Frau Clinton, with her typical honesty, promises candy for all good children.
Say whatever it takes, but prepare the SS for midnight action.
Another Redistribution (Queen) for votes. How about getting a handle on the government waste (that you have participated in during your years of service) to use for infrastructure?
Please don't make me look at or hear that __________for 4 years. Her campaign will probably do me in.
Every politician promises jobs, tax cuts, and to be tough on crime. If it were that easy, the guy in office would already be doing it.
Fuck this criminal bitch. She should be in jail for what she (and her trailer-park-trolling husband) have done.
I'd take the fucking Socialist, Bernie Sanders, over this psychopath. At least he comes by his mental disorder honestly. This female (not to be confused with a woman) is the slimiest, fakest, most power-hungry bitch in the history of the country. She'll say and do ANYTHING to get in that White House. Anybody wants it that bad, you don't EVER give it to them.
"I'm ready for Hillary (to bump her had again and go permanently cross-eyed)"
She's an old, wrinkled, tired, senile, international conwoman/criminal, murdering, lying, incompetent, change-with-the-wind hypocrit who perfectly embodies the Jackass her party sports as its symbol.
In the Senate, she voted for the UNPROVOKED war on Iraq.
At the State Department she supported the UNPROVOKED bombing of Libya, the UNPROVOKED proxy war on SYRIA, and the neo-nazi coup d'état in Ukraine.
Call her a fascist warmonger pig.
A vote for Hillary is a vote for WWIII.
But remember, she was FOR all those things before she was AGAINST all those things.
So what difference does it make?
/sarc
She's already been tattooed with being a criminal. The whole fact she can still show her face attests to just how broken things are.
It is the same everywhere. Laws are for us little people. If they get in the way of progress for the big people, they disregard them.
pods
By "fairer" she meant globally, not you people. She meant that to mean that the last remaining decent paying jobs will be offshored under the TPP deal they just did, whereby providing a "fairer" economy for say... outter mongolia.
The plan is set:
Black president -- check
Woman president -- check
Gay president -- TBD
Transgender president -- TBD
Chia pet -- TBD
That outta do it.
you ignore the womyn at your own peril.
it's her turn.
learn it, live it, love it.
Phuck this kunt, I'd root for sirhan sirhan over this piece of shit.
The opening line from the below NY Times Oped is priceless and a better description of her would be hard to come by.
"Essay;Blizzard of Lies"
"By WILLIAM SAFIRE"
"Published: January 8, 1996""Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar."
The timing of Bernie Sander's populist message (it doesn't matter whether it is "socialist" or whatever it is labeled) will have broad appeal by 2016. He's going to win the college crowd, the unemployed, underemployed, low-paid recent college grad crowd, the beaten down over-worked under appreciated dysfunctional cubical worker crowd, the gun toting rednecks in the South that have been getting screwed by Uncle Warren's 25% mortgage rates on their mobile home, the black vote because he was a grass roots civil rights guy back in his college days, etc, etc...........
He is going to surprise the hell out of everyone just like Ronald Reagan did in 1980. Ronald Reagan won because he was a sort of populist and was real to people. Bernie Sander's is a salt of the earth kind of guy. Yeah, he's a liberal, but is anybody going to care. What does that mean anyway? He is going to strike a chord with a lot large cross section of the 99%ers
The Republican Party is an old clown show stuck in 2008, 2004, 2000, 1996, 1992. Donald Trump's hair just keeps getting bigger and bigger.
Thanks for showing your team colors. As long as you still believe in the red team vs blue team dichotomy you are playing their game. And if Hillary takes the nomination over Sanders you will be a nice little robot and vote for the D rather than the person. I get it. You may not like how Trump delivers his message, but people would be far better off under a Trump presidency than a Clinton. If you liked your NAFTA and GATT you get to keep them with Hillary and also get a TPP thrown in gratis.
Are you dumb or just plain stupid? Or, are you just a moron?
That was a HUGE jump to a conclusion that was based on nothing I said in my post. I was just making an astute observation about Bernie Sander's populist appeal. I made the Reagan comparison because I was on the Citizens for Reagan (not even associated with the Republican Party) bandwagon looooong before anyone was thinking he was going to be President, and I simply see a political and economic environment that is ripe for a populist that appeals to more than one class of voters.
I'm an Independent, and in Arizona that means I get to vote in the primary of my choice next year. And guess what smart ass? That means I, along with a growing number of other independents plan on doing what we can to sabotage Hiilary's chance of winning AZ by voting for Bernie Sanders.
I was Mr. Republican back in the day. I shook the hand of Ronald Reagan (became a believer after that Panama Canal Speech he gave) went to Ford, Reagan, George H.W. Bush and GW campaign rallies back in the day before I opened my eyes and applied strong reading comprehension skills (something I recommend you attempt to acquire) and saw the light, and had to reconsider my positions on many things other than general support of what Reagan and Volker tried to accomplish in the first term economically. So, I jumped ship and anyone that knows me knows that I can't stand either party as a whole but like individuals (Ron Paul for example). I won't throw the baby out with the bath water. Otherwise, politics is childish - look at the immediate preceding post as an example.
A populist is a populist and a populist has strange bedfellows (The usual suspects tried to label Reagan as a rich Republican but he got the blue collar vote); I was just saying that Mr. Socialist-Liberal Sanders (which he is) may strike a chord with people that don't normally associate with socialist-liberals (it's the middle class getting screwed stupid).
I wouldn't be so harsh with my retort if you weren't so ignorant in your condescension.
So, take your whole red/blue mumbo jumbo and shove it up your ass and take a basic reading comprehension course at your local GED night school, go back and read my post and then consider your comments, which were utter nonsense.
And, I could care less about Trump's delivery. He's got a really bad hairdo - he looks like a clown. If it's between him and Hillary, I'll vote for the bad hairdo.
I read your comments. After posting effusive "shivers went up my leg" comments about Sanders winning every single group in the US that you can segregatge people into you effectively trash Trump in the single sentence you mention him. Fine you have your opinion and I have mine. Your reply speaks about being a populist. Again fine. But the fact that you can't see the fact that Trump is also a populist is interesting. Maybe because he isnt a liberal populist?
And you are for Sanders - OK, fine. But where will the money come from to pay for all these things that Sanders wants to do? Its always nice spending other peoples money. As many jokes as you want to make about Trumps hair, he understands finance and the signifigance of the trade deals we currently have a hell of a lot better than any other candidate on either side.
Ok Einstein, let me help you out a little bit here. Go back and read my follow-up post. Why am I voting for Sanders in the Primary next year?
*Let me give you a little help - it's only for one reason and its in an attempt to keep another candidate whose name starts with "H" from winning the primary and hopefully she will lose many others , so MAYBE a stupid REBUBLICAN will have a chance to win the general election despite how intellectually vacuous REPUBLICANS are, as you have so aptly demonstrated,.which is another reason I left that silly party.
Ok Einstein, let me help you out a little bit here. Go back and read my follow-up post. Why am I voting for Sanders in the Primary next year?
*Let me give you a little help - it's only for one reason and its in an attempt to keep another candidate whose name starts with "H" from winning the primary and hopefully she will lose many others , so MAYBE a stupid REBUBLICAN will have a chance to win the general election despite how intellectually vacuous REPUBLICANS are, as you have so aptly demonstrated,.which is another reason I left that silly party.
Ok Einstein, let me help you out a little bit here. Go back and read my follow-up post. Why am I voting for Sanders in the Primary next year?
*Let me give you a little help: It's only for one reason and its in an attempt to keep another candidate whose name starts with "H" from winning the primary and hopefully she will lose many others, so MAYBE a stupid REBUBLICAN will have a chance to win the general election despite how intellectually vacuous REPUBLICANS are, as you have aptly demonstrated. I am usually am not so terse and don't respond to comments but when they are so stupid and off base, well, I'm just trying to help you. Go educate yourself, really educate yourself about reason and wisdom.
STFU about trade and who knows what about trade and finances and whatever - I don't care. The economy's due for a $50 Trillion correction at some point in time and will come by hook or by crook - that's my focus. Nobody's gonna save us from it per se, but how are we going to manage it as a society and a nation?
"STFU about trade and who knows what about trade and finances and whatever - I don't care. The economy's due for a $50 Trillion correction at some point in time and will come by hook or by crook - that's my focus. Nobody's gonna save us from it per se, but how are we going to manage it as a society and a nation?"
And the person running the country doesnt need to know about trade or finance either from your point of view, which you follow up with speaking about a $50 trillion correction. And I suppose that $50 trillion dollar overextension arose entirely outside of finance and trade over the last couple of decades? Maybe we'd be better off if the next prez took it to $60T?
Every response you make to my posts makes an inference to something I didn't even say in my posts. Put the crack pipe down and lay off the lithium for a moment. If there was a "$50 Trillion correction" per se, managing that correction, if that were the case, logically would involve "finance and trade" among many other things, would it not? Com'on man slow down and think for a minute. It's a basic simple logical inference that you should have made, right?
So, actually Deputy Fife, you can't even get your gun out of the holster again before firing it, AGAIN!
We are all Greek Muslim Nigger victims .... of Zionism .... see, I can be a jerk .... just like Hillary ! (no comments please)
What is she going to do for the "every other day Americans?"
Half as much?
At twice the cost.
Hillary Clinton - "THE Division Belle"
Did you mean Baal?
Neither political party gives a damn about US citizens.
Time to declare ourselves illegals and get free benefits
New World Order, Fourth Reich now set up in Europe, Berlin set as European Capital,
Will not be surprised to see European Muslims run out of town, back to North Arica and M East.
I'm guessing they'll only be pushed back down to Greece. You know, keep tightening the screws by breaking shit.
Better, we just got the fascist TPP corporate extortion act shoved up our collective ass, but Hitlery wants to talk about "fairness".
We are awash in rackets and this cunt is just another racketeer, and a particularly annoying and ugly one at that.
Question: I hope the sane common sense midst of ZH can answer.
Why do we continue to let us be Governed by Children, Psychopaths & Sociopaths?
Why? We should be hanging these Criminals.
Try it...
We have the best system money can buy.
Any attempts to really change it will be met by reaction from the powers that be.
Because the vast majority of the public gets their information from the mass media.
In turn, the mass media is owned by 6 corporations.
In turn, those 6 corporations are owned by Globalists.
In summary, the Globalists choose the politicians.
And if ever the public get smart and reject the "choices" given them by the Globalists.
There's Diebold, to "fix" the vote.
Diebold, in turn, is owned by the Globalists.
Are you beginning to see the common denominator here?
You left out that most of the owners and top execs amongst these media 'globalists' are Jews - the 2.5%.
Zionists and Anglos, with a smattering of Asians make up the Globalists.
As for mass media, yes, overwhelmingly Zios.
And Hollywood is 100% Zio-owned.
Jews Boast of Owning Hollywood—But Slam Gentiles Who Say the Same
http://newobserveronline.com/jews-boast-of-owning-hollywood-but-slam-gen...
As for mass media - you're looking at
Comcast {formerly GE}
News Corp
Disney
Viacom
Time Warner
CBS
http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-me...
you could also add in a few others like
Bain
Gannett Co
Washington Post Co
arguably for influence - New York Times Corp.
http://www.freepress.net/ownership/chart#b_4
comcast was founded by 3 people - 2 were Jewish. of the 3 top officers only 1 is Jewish.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comcast
What's tougher to get at is ownership and middle management...
If you go down the list - what you find is that Jews are way, way over 2.5% of top positions at all these places.
The point is - this is why Israel gets a pass for war crimes, why every rocket that lands in an empty field is on the front page of the Times but church burnings by Jewish settlers isn't, and why the lies about Iran's nuclear weapons programs are repeated over and over.
And a larger point - this pattern is also true in the UK, Canada, Australia, Russia.... and Ukraine.
for example - can you imagine this naked bias being acceptable for any other group but Jews/Israel - seriously? -
Meet the New York Times’ New Israel-Palestine News Chief
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/02/21/meet-the-new-york-times-new-israe...
The Truth About Cease-fire Violations Between Israel and Gaza
Yousef Munayyer, Executive Director of The Jerusalem Fund, explains how it typically works: Israel can “fire into Gaza without accountability, provoke a reaction and then claim self-defense.” See here for his explanation of the methodology.
I have written about previous cases in which Israel breaks the cease-fire with bombings, shootings, or territorial incursions, and then uses the retaliation from Gaza as a justification to launch a deeper bombing campaign here and here.
Israel violates the cease-fires more often, bombs Gaza more times than Gaza rockets Israel, and kills more Palestinians than Palestinians kill Israelis. But these findings are not what is striking. What is striking about this is that almost everybody believes the opposite of the reality. Here’s Munayyer with more on that:
So how have these cease-fire dynamics been covered? We’ve tracked New York Times coverage of the cease-fire during this period. The New York Times is representative of the mainstream and extremely important for shaping public discourse on events and thus an important window into broader mainstream coverage. The Times also has multiple reporters covering these events including a bureau in Jerusalem and a correspondent in Gaza. Finally, we simply can’t track everything so the Times, with its easily searchable history, is an effective example to use.
Of the nearly 120 Israeli cease-fire violations during this period the New York Times reported on 17 of them. Additionally, most of these stories (eleven) came either during the first week of the cease-fire, when the issue was still fresh in readers’ minds, or since the escalation on December 20th. That means for the bulk of this period, during which Israel committed 87 cease-fire violations and causing some 91 Palestinian casualties over nearly a one year period there were only six stories on the topic. This represents a systematic failure to cover Israeli cease-fire violations.
Making matters worse is the way events are covered in the rare instances they are covered. In most cases, Israeli actions are described as a response to Palestinian actions. So while most Israeli cease-fire violations are not covered at all, those that are are explained as justified retaliation. Thus the reader is completely misled about the dynamics of fire, why the cease-fire is threatened and exactly what is going on in and around Gaza.
The biggest challenge to the cease-fire agreement is persistent Israeli violation and the lack of any accountability for them. The politics of the Gaza Strip are complex. Israel says it wants Hamas to control projectile fire from other factions and yet it persistently violates the truce putting Hamas in a position of having to defend Israel’s violations. By targeting groups other than Hamas and by expecting Hamas to crack down on their responses, Israel is playing a dangerous and deadly game of divide and conquer in Gaza that will likely lead to the unraveling of the cease-fire. Once again, Israel has proven security is not its aim, subjugation is.
http://antiwar.com/blog/2014/02/06/the-truth-about-cease-fire-violations...
OR
how about the lack of coverage of the fact Netanyahu has cried wolf on Iran for 20+ years, and is himself implicated in a smuggling ring?
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/03/02/brief-history-netanyahu-cr...
http://irmep.org/ila/krytons/
It goes on and on.
Now you say "Jews control the media" and people cry and shit their pants....
why?
Because it's untrue?
Well - it's in a direct sense over-stated. Of course, there are plenty of non-Jewish execs.
But the whining and shouting of anti-semite is really about wanting to prevent any discussion of THE WILDLY DISPROPORTIONATE INFLUENCE of Jews in news and entertainment media, to say nothing of federal agencies and departments.
Anyone not Jewish who wants to cover say, Gaza fairly, will be immediately smeared as an "anti-Semite" and lose his job.
It is the "indirect control" of Jews in addition to direct control that makes it fair to say Jews more or less control the media.
And if you don't like me saying it - sorry - but you are simply trying to obfuscate the disproportionate power of one group to the detriment of everyone else. Hence I think **you** are acting immorally. I'm just stating what seems to be the truth.
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/media/bias.html
It's not good, it's not fair, and given Israel's warmongering and colonialist/expansionist plans - it involves putting American blood and treasure on the line for a small foreign country.
But as far as these pages on ZH go, one also has to question why you feel the need to create at least two accounts, and toggle between them on the same thread?
Counterpunch = The Delicate Genius.
Your posting styles, and content, are identical.
I saw it as soon as it started.
Busted.
so much for honesty on your part.
Why do we continue to let us be Governed by Children, Psychopaths & Sociopaths?
Tradition.
But the duopoly decrees it!
Go Jeb! Go Hillary!
Why do we continue to let us be Governed by Children, Psychopaths & Sociopaths?
Because most of the populace is not on ZH and could not comprehend nor click on most of the articles. The programming has taken decades if not longer and it has been effective. One of the pigs being trotted around right now will be the next president and it will be just like the old boss, answering to the same bosses. Even if the masses did wake up and "vote", Greece shows us just how worthwhile that is.
Why? Because people like my super do-gooder 70+ year old inlaws are gonna vote for her.
Amazing how belief systems can undermine any and all rationality, as without them, people have no sense of grounding/stability.
Worse yet, they'd be forced to face their own culpability in the promotion of evil.
Which will never, ever, ever, ever happen.
Because once someone is indoctrinated into the system, if you try to pull their plug to show them what's really going on they will fight you instead. The elites have created their own insurance policy/defence force: sheeple.
Yes, I agree with most if not all the points made. Yes they created & own the four systems which control human domain. The Economic System, the religious system, the education system & most importantly the Political systems.
However, since Babaylon Time & Sumerian Time the Psychopaths have always used the same system of control. Either a Step Model Model of Authority / Monarch Reign Pyamid Model of Authority.
Cut the money supply, IE. Taxes you cut the head of the snake. Education is key. Peaceful Non- Compliance / Non Participation into their system of Devt Bo Dave & Enslavement is the key.
I tried pushing the same solution this weekend to my friend over the weekend. But since this individualized plan didn't immediately solve the problem for all 6B+ people on the planet, it wasn't worth considering. Then he tried describing how free people had to voluntarily create a force for good, yet would sit there and deny that the concept was even force, and would not consider the fact that you cannot keep force free from the evil people who will always seek it for their own empowerment.
Long story short, I lost my last friend who I thought had a chance (as he is very anti-government, albeit very anti-this-government) of throwing off of the shackles.
I pulled the plug on the elites a number of years ago, but they are too uneducated to figure it out. Frankly, the elites don't know what they are doing and are flying by the seat of their pants every single day. In brief, I can assure you that the elites have no plan whatsoever and are equally as shit-for-brains as the 'sheeple'. In this World they believe that the blind can indeed lead the blind down the garden path to purgatory. Greece, and the architects of the EU, are blind, deaf, and dumb, and always were, frankly.
The difference is that the elite can afford to buy mercenaries and send them about protecting their interests whether fair or unfair, real or perceived.
Two hoots,
Could not agree more, and to think
I said no one worse to hear than the O.
Easy Peasy!
How much do you have?
How fast can you get it to DC?
FORWARD SOVIET!
this is pathetic with over 300M US citizens, we are down to 2 families when it comes to politics
the Bush and the Clinton, very pathetic
Overlook the facts….
transfer wealth from upper middle (slave) class to lower middle (slave) class and to lower (leisure) class.
Its kinda cute you think there will be a transfer that actually gets to the intended "victim" class. Most of that additional money will be recycled to the same people who paid it with a little laundry action to make sure the politicians get an additional taste. A BIG taste of it.
Middle class? Go suck an egg.
FORWARD SOVIET!
One has the semblance of a family/empire, the other is some plastic representation of self-exhaulted imperialism.
At least she'll get a good nickname when she's president. Like The Iron Cunt or something similar.
The Bay of Pigs
Eeewww.
Das nasssty.
I prefer to call her Taco Belle. And Houma LOVES her some taco.
FORWARD SOVIET!
There there, it's not so bad. We also have Donald Tru-hhhuuurrrrgghhh...
So sorry, just threw up in my mouth..
Hillary can't drop out otherwise brides to the Clinton Crime Foundation will dry up like a California lawn
I don't think Bill is very interested in "brides", just cash and young girls.
* "except for my chosenites...now they aren't part of the sharing economy you see..."
I just love this phrase:
Complete and total nonsense. Unmitigated lying bullshit.
The irony here is that it reportedly pays very well to script "unmitigated lying bullshit."
i hate that word, "fair". it's one that is always predictably trotted out by labour whenever there's a general election here in old blighty...
'fair' is entirely subjective. what's fair to you is not necessarily fair to me. it's a completely meaningless word. but to labourites, it always means that someone should pay for X, and that someone sure isn't me.
My 4-year-old always complains about his brother not being fair. Merica is populated by adult 4-year-olds and TPTB know it.
Make them put a price tag on "fair"....you'll never get a straight answer.
I have a great idea. Let's pay all the trolls to discuss the word "Fair" rather than the fact it is all complete lying nonsense designed to make people ignore actual fact.
Or, maybe just call her lots and lots of dirty names. That always works. I mean, it did in grade school, didn't it?!
I've determined that FAIR is actually an acronym.
Fuck All Ignoring Reason
Vince, I've asked my libtard family members countless times what percentage of income is the "fair share" and I have NEVER gotten an answer.
@EscapeKey,
Years ago a corporate division manager's favorite saying was, "Fair is a childs word."
There ya have it.
Fair?
Well, get used to it.
"Fairness" is one of the bedrock beliefs of the populist underclass. THAT'S why the sheepdogs of the left are constantly spewing about "fairness".
The underclass is very tribal, and they have believed since primitive times that if they are loyal to their tribal shaman, the tribe will guarantee a "fair share" of the tribes hunting and gathering.
The textbook leftist pitch is: "you have been treated unfairly by [blah blah blah], and I'm going to make sure you get a fair share of [blah blah blah].
Works like catnip on the populist underclass.
Always give out about 15% that you collect in a tax-exempt charitable foundation that you set up. The Clinton foundation is a prime example.
You never know when you need millions to buy a cum-stained blue dress.
Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist(2012,2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as “other expenses.”
http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2015/04/the-clinton-foundation-app...
This kind of thing is so outrageous. I've heard most charities are massive scams for elite. Imagine if you or I tried to do the same thing.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://tshirtlegend.com/wp-content/u...
"Fair" is progressive-speak for "bend over."
For the tribalist underclass, "fair" means "you're going to get half of the rich guy's stuff".
Nothing this lying bitch says is true. It is pandering drivel designed to dupe the American voter and propel this nausating cunt to greater power. Fuck Hilary 2016
I agree, but the American electorate is simply stupid, made that way from decades of dumbing-down public education. '..dupe the American voter'? ...you're years behind reality.
Obama’s new Fair Housing Rules made us equal.
I'm thinking the Banksters will put in a Republicrat this time around the enrage the deluded Demicans and give false hope to the Oliphants.
The end result will be the same either way; less for more with a side-crock of steaming bullshit. BOHICA!
it really doesn't matter.
the only politicians with a chance of being elected are those who can raise $1bn to spend on largely smear campaigns.
and the only way to raise that kind of money is to sell your soul to corporations.
lan jiao wei many many.
She has no soul but she does have a vajayjay, which means she has all the necessary qualifications to be President of today's United States.
get back in the kitchen u fucking skank
Can't someone throw a bucket of water on her and be done with it already?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPO43kCh3_c
My favorite ringtone for sibling. ;D
Life is not "fair". Evolve or die.
Watched some recent Trump interviews over the weekend and he's absolutely hilarious, great commedy and TV.
I like his message as well, it is time to get America back from the lowlifes in Washington. Let's give him credit for that.
Every great circus needs great clowns. I watched the interview with Katy Tur, and have to agree, hilarity ensued! He absolutely won't play nice with the media, as all they do is insult him while trying to trap him. His response to Katy?
"You're so naive."
Want to make a "fairer" economy? How about repealing NAFTA and GATT for starters? Oh, right, that's a big part of your legacy from the first time around as "co-president," wasn't it? Along with repealing Glass-Steagall, what a great move that turned out to be.
Hillary wants to help "everyday Americans" like Colonel Sanders wants to be a chicken's best friend. But then again, what did we really expect from a former member of Wal-Mart's board? Spends her entire career crushing working people under her boot heel for her Wall Street buddies, but now wants to make things more "fair" for the poor, beleagured working class; what a monstrous hypocrite she is.
How far do you think this nugget from Jesse's will get?
http://truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/senate-bill-would-reinstate-glass-steagall-act-to-keep-banks-from-gambling-with-our-money
More theater.
McShame...really?
Typical closing the barn door after the horses have already escaped. You can bet the next monetary con is well underway.
I new I smelled poontang, varmint poontang. She can go fuck herself.
I have a great idea. Let's pay all the trolls to discuss the word "Fair" rather than the fact it is all complete lying nonsense designed to make people ignore actual fact.
Or, maybe just call her lots and lots of dirty names. That always works. I mean, it did in grade school, didn't it?!
Oh Im sorry I take that back " It can go fuck itself "
fixed it for you.
Goldman Sachs hand chosen candidate, an opportunist only interested in her own advancement. Insincere and phony. We all need another scandal ridden Clinton presidency.
Vote Hillarroid 2016.
I'm pretty sure she's interested in cash too -- a lot of it.
Ahhhhhh.... the ol' "small business is the backbone" meme gets trotted out again. Gotta love it!
If I owned a small business I would seek cover... just like every election.
Education meme
Infrastructure meme
For the children meme
I feel your pain meme
Same script same boring bull shit
I have a great idea. Let's pay all the trolls to discuss the word "Fair" rather than the fact it is all complete lying nonsense designed to make people ignore actual fact.
Or, maybe just call her lots and lots of dirty names. That always works. I mean, it did in grade school, didn't it?!
im expecting her to address social security reform and military spending lol
Yeah, less of the first and more of the second.
I know this is highly controverial, but in my opinion, profits arising from criminal fraud (insider trading, market manipulation, front running, rate rigging, un-capitalized re-hypothecated derivatives, mortgage fraud, etc etc etc etc etc) should be taxed at a higher rate than profits arising from legal and ethical activity.
Will that be part of the Progressive's new plan?
She is a pathological liar and should be thrown out of any race for government. 7 years with this current trash is enough! But, must say, she sure is aging well! NOT!!
That's her biggest qualification, duh.
A hagocracy is every witch's fantasy.
billary, sell the "hopey changey" plot, you nazi cunt!!!
Lower taxes on small businesses by raising the minimum wage?
Political apathy is a plague and it's here, they say whatever they want even if it makes no sense and people just can't even process the bullshit anymore.
Sit back, enjoy your slow slide down a slippery slope into fuedalism.
Hunger games bitchez.
Bullshit artist. Intellectually dishonest. Self-interested while ever J subservient. Looks up to her masters as she executes their agenda and in the same breath looks down on america as she spews her liberal deceptions. This might well be the most important election in the history of the country, because this bitch will be more a servant of the nc's and J's than obozo ever was.
She seems overwhelmingly qualified/sarc/.
She will say anything. Notice how the mainstream media is quick to write articles whenever she voices an opinion on anything and everything. Hillary vows to find America's missing socks!
Her economic policy has always been in plain sight. That policy is to tax every creature in the suburbs to buy the maximum number of votes among poor city dwellers (bums, poor whites, poor blacks, poor Hispanics, illegal aliens and anything else that can pull a voting lever/vote a ballot). Anything else she says is pure lies and BS.
If the majority of people are below the poverty line (and the numbers are growing bigger every day), then you have the current situation.
If everybody was working and making a living wage, they would be above the poverty line (and paying taxes)... then the tax burden would be lower for everybody, and we wouldn't have to put up with this horseshit system.
Unfortunately, Ms Clinton may be the best hope that the world has got!
Corrupt, and not necessarily the lesser of evils, she does appear to possess one quality that modern Republicans appear to lack - SANITY.
This sanity will be crucial as the zionists will insist on pursuing their failed Muslim wars. Containment and attrition will require patience. And patience requires sanity.
Go Hillary, the fascist bitch, from the far-left of US politics...
Lay off the crack pipe, dude.
SANITY????
Hahahahhehehehehohooho...
Let the Donald loose on this twat.
Any attack on her policies will be characterized as an attack on her gender.
Her vagina is impenetrable.
A number of years ago, an Atomic Dildo was tested on her.
It self-destructed and wiped out the remote town in Nevada where it was tested.
Right On.
Moth balled.
The Donald wouldn't touch Hitlery's dried up leathery twat even with Moochelle's wookie dick
Good ol Hill is sponsored by the BANKS. Who the fuck would vote for her? honestly! after everything that has transpired this century it should only take a decade for people to wake up. She is talking about FAIR oh FFS! obvious is obviously crazy insane on the marching powder or something as the banks want a return on investment.
Everyone but me will have to surrender all their monies and property.
This is outrageous! I won't stand for it!! Unless it means that she'll make you give me some of your stuff.
HILLARY 2016!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chelsea 2024!
Malia 2032
Just how f*cking stupid have Americans become to actually eat this sh*t and call it dessert.
I saw an "I 'heart' Hillary" bumper sticker just yesterday. The vehicle had Massachusetts plates.
Half this country will vote for her b/c they are womyn, and she is a womyn. Regardless of her historically unethical and immoral behavior. AND, there's another 20% or more of the male population that will vote for her b/c she's a democrat.
She's the next leader of the "Free" world. You can count on it.
The only leading she will be doing is from a jail cell. Her list of felonies is just too large to ignore. Then there are the war crimes, the unprovoked destruction of sovereign nations and the rivers of blood from hundreds of thousands killed as a result.
Bitch is going to jail. You can count on it.
She should have never jumped back into the light, should stayed in the dark with the rest of the cockroaches. Might have escaped prosecution, maybe.
Grimaldus
She and her husband accepted bribes from foreign governments for the Clinton Foundation. This used to be considered treason. This long time ago in a forgotten country called America where the rule of law mattered and the constitution was followed by all.
But , but when we left The White House me and my husband were dead broke.....I guess those four homes you own with that 12 million dollar Bungalow counts as broke...lol...How stupid can people be?...wait, never mind....
Poverty sucks so bad, that's why they had to steel all the "W" keys off all of white house keyboards and abscond with a few pieces of white house furniture
"Fairer redistribution"- as she gives her squid winks to her handlers.
This woman is terrifying to behold, in fairness to Bill, would you trust any part of your anatomy in her mouth ?
On the other hand does anyone here actually believe that which party or leader gets elected would affect something like those trade agreements ceding sovereignty to global corporations ? No me neither.
What I am wondering is why is she alone always getting so many negative articles on this website, maybe she isnt the only one who says whatever shes told to by her financial backers.
So, "tax cuts for small businesses" and "increase in minimum wage". LOL! That's like a rapist offering a reach around..
i don't even know where to begin on this speech:
she rails against hedge funds yet her only child is married to a hedge fund manager.
she rails against the banks yet she gave 4 speeches to goldman last year which she was well compensated for.
she rails against the "sharing economy" yet ALL her supporters, staff, etc. use uber, air bnb, etc.
its simply mind-numbing even attempting to listen to a liberal try and make the case for her
She is the epitome of the liberal axiom: "Do as I say, not as I do."
Small business is defined as Annual sales less than $300 million per year based on the tax code.
1. Kill and/or incarcerate all political opposition
2. ??????????
3. PROFIT!!!!
No doubt Dixie Flatline has divulged the full Clinton strategy. Just ask Juanita Broadrick or Vince Foster.
I like Trrumps idea of Mexico paying $100,000 America dollars for every "immigrant" they send us. I'll take two from the State of Woah-hauka, sir.
I am going to retire in "Putin-ville"
"Our politicians are corporate employees. And if you get dewy-eyed about the possibility of the U.S. having its first woman president, remember that it was Hillary Clinton’s husband who decimated manufacturing jobs with the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement and then went on to destroy welfare with the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, which halted federal cash aid programs and imposed time-limited, restrictive state block grants. Under President Bill Clinton, most welfare recipients—and 70 percent of those recipients were children—were dropped from the rolls. The prison-industrial complex exploded in size as its private corporations swallowed up surplus, unemployed labor, making $40,000 or more a year from each person held in a cage. The population of federal and state prisons combined rose by 673,000 under Clinton. He, along with Ronald Reagan, set the foundations for the Greecification of the United States." - by Chris Hedges
Just about everything Clinton did was the worst thing that Clinton did. The fact that there is a love affair legacy with that disbarred, impeached, serial rapist clown is anathema to me.
Midnight Basketball? No that wasn't RACIST...
I could get behind a tax on financial transactions over a certain size... no problem with taxing Wall Street and the super wealthy more.
whining that its' 'redistribution' doesnt really impress me. People with hundreds of millions of dollars make money just by having money... makes no sense to tax them at the same rate as the guy flipping burgers.
FICA can and should be progressive...
I, too, would go with Sanders the socialist over anyone else. Mostly because he's the least worst, and if he might do some shit I dont agree with as a Left Libertarian....
so will every other candidate - but instead of "redistribution" of some multi-millionaire's wealth, it will be needless wars, more domestic spying, repression, etc.
and a lot more innocent people all over the world dead for bullshit reasons.
Taxes are theft dude. You must be a state worshiper.
FOAD.
Grimaldus
All you need to know ... her lips are moving.