This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

WTI Back Below $50 After Inventory Build Takes Crude Stocks To Highest In 80 Years

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Following yesterdsy's API data, DOE has confirmed a 2.5 million barrel build in crude inventory - the highest stocks of crude at this time of year in at least 80 years. This was accompanied by a very small drop in production and has squeezed WTI back below $50 (although there was an algo flash-smash up to $50.50 right after the data).

 

Crude inventories rose by the most in 3 months...

 

 US EIA: REPEATS CRUDE STOCKS HIGHEST IN AT LEAST 80 YRS, RTRS

Which we assume means for this time of year...


 

 

Dragging Crude lower (despite a flash smash)

 

Algos are turmoiling...

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:44 | 6341319 saints51
saints51's picture

Perfect pic Tyler. I was saying the same thing. Throw on Vwap and you will see algo's smashed it back down once it hit that deviation. Now, it can not stay above Vwap.......yet?

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:48 | 6341324 Headbanger
Headbanger's picture

Wait a minute... EIGHTY YEARS you say??

Impossible!

There was only a fraction of the oil storage capacity we have today in 1935!

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:52 | 6341344 greyghost
greyghost's picture

enter stage left....crudeprice.com to tell how this is all in the plan for higher prices

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:02 | 6341394 divingengineer
divingengineer's picture

I have no doubt that the carpetbaggers on Wall St. have some sort of scheme in the works to parlay this into $120/bbl oil. 

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:12 | 6341434 El Vaquero
El Vaquero's picture

Mainstreet cannot afford $120/bbl.  Wall Street needs mainstreet to survive, else there are not enough people to fleece.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 12:03 | 6341610 Burnbright
Burnbright's picture

Crude price seems to make little difference. Gas prices around where I live are almost as much as when it was $100 a barrel. Crude could be $1 and I bet you would still pay more than $3 a gallon in California.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 14:09 | 6342038 thamnosma
thamnosma's picture

Prices where I am in Kalifornicate are almost $4.00 a gallon.  The reason claimed is that the giant Exxon refinery is down from a fire and The State is making it difficult for them to reopen.  That would be like the twisted psychopathic socialists running the government here.  Steeped in some environmental regulations and extortion, cause the gas price to rise at least a buck above market.   The blame the oil companies while the utterly dumbed down population continues to vote them in, too stoopid to realize it's The State creating a massive regressive tax on the middle and working classes via the gas price.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 14:31 | 6342150 scam_MERS
scam_MERS's picture

@ thamnosma: Yep, I paid $3.89 yesterday at Costco, the lowest price in the area. The lines there were out into the parking lot, the higher it goes, the longer the line gets! Most stations in the area are well over $4.00 already. We're getting absolutely raped at the pump and Moonbeam is loving it - the higher the price goes, the more tax money for his Train To Nowhere. I want to move out of this socailist hell-hole but I'm trapped with a house to sell and then - where to go from here? What state is going to be any better? They're all going to the CA model of socialism rapidly.

TRUMP 2016!!

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:54 | 6341350 froze25
froze25's picture

I think its a matter of % utilization of storage capacity that is at a 80 year high.  So total capacity wouldn't matter.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:02 | 6341397 Headbanger
Headbanger's picture

OK.  Fair enough. 

Would be good to see ZH put up that chart

But none the less, it's very ominous to see the year "1935" depth of the Great Depression as our current benchmark.

Me thinks the headline would have greater impact saying "since 1935"  and at least some mention of "since Lehman"

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:24 | 6341476 KnuckleDragger-X
KnuckleDragger-X's picture

Recovery summer is going well and the best is yet to come. I can hardly wait for the rout in the energy sector bonds that will undoubtedly push the stock market higher.......

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:00 | 6341383 divingengineer
divingengineer's picture

We use super tankers for floating storage now, in 1935 they used warships.

I answered your question with a nonsensical answer, does that mean I win the arguement?

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:35 | 6341514 Headbanger
Headbanger's picture

Yes you win!

But try not decompressing so fast next time.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:03 | 6341403 saints51
saints51's picture

Now we closed above VWAP. Is it time for a serious ramp today? Running stops? Ping Pong?

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:46 | 6341329 Bunghole
Bunghole's picture

But the guys at Oil Price.com said there would be a draw this month and the price would rebound.

http://oilprice.com/Energy/Oil-Prices/Forget-Media-Hype-Oil-Set-To-Rebou...

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

 

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:01 | 6341389 CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

OilPrice is one of my contrary indicators, particularly with trading/investing ... with the caveat that sometimes they have sane content, but those usually don't give you stock tickers and shit like that.

Regards,

Cooter

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:50 | 6341337 lunaticfringe
lunaticfringe's picture

It matters not. I shall go to my retailer and pay the same 3.09 I've been paying for weeks. Price fixing mf'ers and now a combined 70 cents a gal in tax. Anyone know how many gallons are in a barrel of oil? 

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:54 | 6341356 El Vaquero
El Vaquero's picture

42 gallons of crude in a barrel.  How much gasoline is going to be dependant on the quality of the crude, but a simple google search will get you some averages.  They'll probably be on sweet light crude though. 

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:57 | 6341369 Bunghole
Bunghole's picture

42 gallon in a barrel which on average yields 12 gallons of diesel and 19 gallons of gasoline.

Yeah, were getting fucked.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:49 | 6341338 Gregor Samsa
Gregor Samsa's picture

Listened to a smart dude talk about this, and he explained that during the time period of inventory draws, a lot of oil, particularly Canadian oil, was not making it to market due to a number of factors (forest fires, maintenance shutdowns, etc). Well all that supply just came back online and guess where it's going?

His prediction: $40 oil coming right up.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:55 | 6341362 greyghost
greyghost's picture

wait just a minute Gregor, crudeprice.com never said anything about a backlog of Canadian oil just waiting to hit the market.........sarc.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:57 | 6341368 saints51
saints51's picture

LOL!!!!!!

Reminds me of people talking about fox or cnn news

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 10:55 | 6341347 El Vaquero
El Vaquero's picture

The data is inconsistent.  The chart shoiwng the change shows too much of a drawdown for one big increas to lead to such a high jump in inventories. 

 

Edit:  The highest stocks for this time of year makes a lot more sense.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:03 | 6341404 q99x2
q99x2's picture

Holy Cow Gold and Silver are getting so low they'll be able to use them for coins again.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:08 | 6341421 wrs1
wrs1's picture

Oil is pointing toward $500 gold.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 12:33 | 6341686 Bunghole
Bunghole's picture

The stackers (me included) didnt like your post but there is truth in that statement.  Therefore, you get a greenie.

The crude to gold ratio says either crude is too low or gold is overpriced.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:07 | 6341417 wrs1
wrs1's picture

All on the back of imports.  Read the report.  

 

U.S. crude oil imports averaged over 7.9 million barrels per day last week, up by 587,000 barrels per day from the previous week. Over the last four weeks, crude oil imports averaged over 7.5 million barrels per day, 2.5% above the same four-week period last year

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:22 | 6341465 saints51
saints51's picture

Now you get Iran.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:21 | 6341461 foodstampbarry
foodstampbarry's picture

So long Canada, we hardly knew ye.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:38 | 6341521 large_wooden_badger
large_wooden_badger's picture

"Take off, hoser!"

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:24 | 6341473 henry chucho
henry chucho's picture

Global population increasing by 84 million consumers a year..1 billion every 13 years..It's like adding 2 California's to the consumption base,every year.No matter how the media spins it,we're going to have serious shortages in oil,water,and food,dead ahead..Party on,mother fuckers,the shit-storm is dead ahead..

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:25 | 6341480 saints51
saints51's picture

Eventually we will. This is what happens when morons sell real assets for legal tender backed by a canon printer.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:29 | 6341493 large_wooden_badger
large_wooden_badger's picture

"All those other bitchezz are printing!!!"

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:33 | 6341504 saints51
saints51's picture

Legendary status

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:49 | 6341557 Bemused Observer
Bemused Observer's picture

Something to consider...with the pullback in consumer spending here in the developed world, there will be less demand for many commodities.
That may free up supplies for the growing non-developed world. Rather than export all their stuff to us, they might have to put it to domestic use instead.

There's no shortage of 'stuff' in the world. It's the DISTRIBUTION mechanisms that are all fucked up, due mainly to our wonderful form of global capitalism.

Also keep in mind that most people in the world do NOT feel the overwhelming need to spend, spend, SPEND! 99.9 percent of the world can live quite well on a fraction of what we here in the West go through on a daily basis, and not feel shorted. And if WE could get over ourselves, we'd see that WE can downsize quite a bit without sacrificing real quality of life.

It's our HABITS that are unsustainable in the long term.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 13:02 | 6341779 Cloud9.5
Cloud9.5's picture

Bemused, I agree that we waste a lot of stuff.  Then I think of guys like Bessemer, Ford, Edison, Bell and Jobs, who made a lot of stuff that other people want. Should we take their stuff?  Sort this through for me.  If everyone shared equally would there be enough I Phones for every person on the planet? If we find there not, should we destroy those I Phones owned by the lucky few because the majority to not have one? If we pumped out the great lakes to water the south west would there be enough water?  If we divided all the stuff into seven billion equal piles of equal stuff, could that be done; would there be enough stuff?  

Never forget that the dividing and distribution of all that stuff is going to take an incredible amount of time, effort and energy. And then, when we get it done we will discover that some people have already lost the stuff we gave them and are now in need of more stuff.  But, where do we get it?  Do we go back to the people who still have their stuff that we gave them and demand more from them?  Will the cycle of redistribution ever end?  Will we ever achieve fairness? 

 

What will be the natural reaction of people once they realize the cycle of redistribution never stops?  What will they do once they realize that the needy multiply at an exponential rate?  What would you do?

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 14:36 | 6342174 Bemused Observer
Bemused Observer's picture

You'll never have 100% fairness, but that doesn't mean you adopt a total hands-off policy and let the chips fall where they may.

Our distribution methods are all geared towards maximizing profits now, regardless of any longer term problems that may result. But you can't properly plan for the future that way, and there are times that things should be done in a way that results in lower profits today in favor of a better result tomorrow. The problem is our economy is being run by the kind of people who lack ANY discipline in that area. They are like the guy who breaks into the food stash you put away for the future, eats it ALL, then tells you, "But I was hungry NOW!".

Great...now we ALL starve tomorrow asshole...

We need adult thinking in finance. We need people with the maturity to forego an immediate reward for themselves in order to ensure a more secure future for everyone. What we have now is two-year olds throwing tantrums because they want ALL the toys for themselves, right NOW!

Think about this...We scold our children when they act in this way. We tell them they MUST share with others, and do NOT reward them when they successfully take another kids toys. Then that same kid overhears a convo where adults who do the same thing are praised for being good businessmen, and that businessman's victims are called stupid or lazy for complaining.

Now look at our kids today and tell me they don't learn much these days...oh yes they DO! Wait till you get old, and need some help yourself. Then you'll see how well they've learned...They'll throw your ass in a home and never look back.

Wed, 07/22/2015 - 11:34 | 6341510 thamnosma
thamnosma's picture

Housing "soaring", economy "booming", stocks flying high and commodities at major lows.  You know, the stuff you need to supply all those booming sectors.  How does this make any sense?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!