This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Attention America's Suburbs: You Have Just Been Annexed
Submitted by Stanley Kurtz via NationalReview.com,
It’s difficult to say what’s more striking about President Obama’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) regulation: its breathtaking radicalism, the refusal of the press to cover it, or its potential political ramifications. The danger AFFH poses to Democrats explains why the press barely mentions it. This lack of curiosity, in turn, explains why the revolutionary nature of the rule has not been properly understood. Ultimately, the regulation amounts to back-door annexation, a way of turning America’s suburbs into tributaries of nearby cities.
This has been Obama’s purpose from the start. In Spreading the Wealth: How Obama Is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Cities, I explain how a young Barack Obama turned against the suburbs and threw in his lot with a group of Alinsky-style community organizers who blamed suburban tax-flight for urban decay. Their bible was Cities Without Suburbs, by former Albuquerque mayor David Rusk. Rusk, who works closely with Obama’s Alinskyite mentors and now advises the Obama administration, initially called on cities to annex their surrounding suburbs. When it became clear that outright annexation was a political non-starter, Rusk and his followers settled on a series of measures designed to achieve de facto annexation over time.
The plan has three elements: 1) Inhibit suburban growth, and when possible encourage suburban re-migration to cities. This can be achieved, for example, through regional growth boundaries (as in Portland), or by relative neglect of highway-building and repair in favor of public transportation. 2) Force the urban poor into the suburbs through the imposition of low-income housing quotas. 3) Institute “regional tax-base sharing,” where a state forces upper-middle-class suburbs to transfer tax revenue to nearby cities and less-well-off inner-ring suburbs (as in Minneapolis/St. Paul).
If you press suburbanites into cities, transfer urbanites to the suburbs, and redistribute suburban tax money to cities, you have effectively abolished the suburbs. For all practical purposes, the suburbs would then be co-opted into a single metropolitan region. Advocates of these policy prescriptions call themselves “regionalists.”
AFFH goes a long way toward achieving the regionalist program of Obama and his organizing mentors. In significant measure, the rule amounts to a de facto regional annexation of America’s suburbs. To see why, let’s have a look at the rule.
AFFH obligates any local jurisdiction that receives HUD funding to conduct a detailed analysis of its housing occupancy by race, ethnicity, national origin, English proficiency, and class (among other categories). Grantees must identify factors (such as zoning laws, public-housing admissions criteria, and “lack of regional collaboration”) that account for any imbalance in living patterns. Localities must also list “community assets” (such as quality schools, transportation hubs, parks, and jobs) and explain any disparities in access to such assets by race, ethnicity, national origin, English proficiency, class, and more. Localities must then develop a plan to remedy these imbalances, subject to approval by HUD.
By itself, this amounts to an extraordinary takeover of America’s cities and towns by the federal government. There is more, however.
AFFH obligates grantees to conduct all of these analyses at both the local and regional levels. In other words, it’s not enough for, say, Philadelphia’s “Mainline” Montgomery County suburbs to analyze their own populations by race, ethnicity, and class to determine whether there are any imbalances in where groups live, or in access to schools, parks, transportation, and jobs. Those suburbs are also obligated to compare their own housing situations to the Greater Philadelphia region as a whole.
So if some Montgomery County’s suburbs are predominantly upper-middle-class, white, and zoned for single-family housing, while the Philadelphia region as a whole is dotted with concentrations of less-well-off African Americans, Hispanics, or Asians, those suburbs could be obligated to nullify their zoning ordinances and build high-density, low-income housing at their own expense. At that point, those suburbs would have to direct advertising to potential minority occupants in the Greater Philadelphia region. Essentially, this is what HUD has imposed on Westchester County, New York, the most famous dry-run for AFFH.
In other words, by obligating all localities receiving HUD funding to compare their demographics to the region as a whole, AFFH effectively nullifies municipal boundaries. Even with no allegation or evidence of intentional discrimination, the mere existence of a demographic imbalance in the region as a whole must be remedied by a given suburb. Suburbs will literally be forced to import population from elsewhere, at their own expense and in violation of their own laws. In effect, suburbs will have been annexed by a city-dominated region, their laws suspended and their tax money transferred to erstwhile non-residents. And to make sure the new high-density housing developments are close to “community assets” such as schools, transportation, parks, and jobs, bedroom suburbs will be forced to develop mini-downtowns. In effect, they will become more like the cities their residents chose to leave in the first place.
It’s easy to miss the de facto absorption of local governments into their surrounding regions by AFFH, because the rule disguises it. AFFH does contain a provision that allows individual jurisdictions to formally join a regional consortium. Yet the rule leaves it up to local authorities to decide whether to enter regional groupings — or at least the rule appears to make participation in regional decision-making voluntary. In truth, however, just by obligating grantees to compare their housing to the demographics of the greater metropolitan area, and remedy any disparities, HUD has effectively turned every suburban jurisdiction into a helpless satellite of its nearby city and region.
We can see this, because the final version of AFFH includes much more than just the provisions of the rule itself. The final text of the regulation incorporates summaries of the many public comments on the preliminary rule, along with replies to those comments by HUD. This amounts to a running dialogue between leftist housing activists trying to make the rule more controlling, local bureaucrats overwhelmed by paperwork, a public outraged by federal overreach, and HUD itself.
Read carefully, the section of the rule on “Regional Collaboration and Regional Analysis” (especially pages 188–203), reveals one of AFFH’s key secrets: It doesn’t really matter whether a local government decides to formally join a regional consortium or not. HUD can effectively draft any suburb into its surrounding region, just by forcing it to compare its demographics with the metropolitan area as a whole.
At one point (pages 189–191), for example, commenters directly note that the obligation to compare local and regional data, and remedy any disparities, amounts to forcing a jurisdiction to ignore its own boundaries. Without contradicting this assertion, HUD then insists that all jurisdictions will have to engage in exactly such regional analysis.
Comments from leftist housing activists repeatedly call on HUD to pressure local jurisdictions into regional planning consortia. At every point, however, HUD declines to demand that local governments formally join such regional collaborations. Yet each time the issue comes up, HUD assures the housing activists that just by compelling local jurisdictions to compare their demographics with the region as a whole, suburbs will effectively be forced to address demographic disparities at the total metropolitan level (e.g., page 196).
When housing activists worry that a suburb with few poor or minority residents will argue that it has no need to develop low-income housing, HUD makes it clear that the regulation as written already effectively forces all suburbs to accommodate the needs of non-residents (pages 198–199). Again, HUD stresses that the mere obligation to analyze, compare, and remedy demographic disparities at the local and regional levels amounts to a kind of compulsory regionalism.
HUD’s language is coy and careful. The Obama administration clearly wants to avoid alarming local governments, so it underplays the extent to which they have been effectively dissolved and regionalized by AFFH. At the same time, HUD wants to tip off its leftist allies that this is exactly what has happened.
At one level, then, the apparatus of formal and voluntary collaboration in a regional consortium is a bit of a ruse. AFFH amounts to an annexation of suburbs by cities, whether the suburbs like it or not. Yet the formal, regional groupings enabled by the rule are far from harmless.
Comments from housing advocates (pages 194–197), for example, chide HUD for failing to include a mention in AFFH of the hundreds of federally-funded regional plans already being developed by leftist activists across the country (the “Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant” program). These plans entail far more than imposing low-income housing quotas on the suburbs. They embody the regionalist program of densifying housing in suburb and city alike, and they structure transportation spending in such a way as to make suburban living far less convenient and workable. HUD replies that these plans can indeed be used by regional consortia to fulfill their obligations under AFFH.
So a city could formally join with some less-well-off inner-ring suburbs and present one of these comprehensive regionalist dream-plans as the product of its consortium. At that point, HUD could pressure reluctant upper-middle-class suburbs to embrace the entire plan on pain of losing their federal funds. In this way, AFFH could force the full menu of regionalist policies—not just low-income housing quotas—onto the suburbs.
There are plenty of ways in which HUD can pressure a suburb to bend to its will. The techniques go far beyond threats to withhold federal funds. The recent Supreme Court decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project has opened the door to “disparate impact” suits against suburbs by HUD and private groups alike. That is, any demographic imbalance, whether intentional or not, can be treated by the courts as de facto discrimination.
Just by completing the obligatory demographic analysis demanded by AFFH—with HUD-provided data, and structured according to HUD requirements—a suburb could be handing the government evidence to be used in such a lawsuit. Worse, AFFH demands that suburbs account for their demographic disparities, and forces them to choose from a menu of HUD-provided explanations. So if a suburb follows HUD’s lead and formally attributes demographic “imbalances” to its zoning laws, the federal government has what amounts to a signed confession to present in a disparate-impact suit seeking to nullify local zoning regulations. With a (forced) paper “confession” from nearly every suburb in the country in hand, HUD can use the threat of lawsuits to press reluctant municipalities to buy into a regional consortium’s every plan.
Regionalists consider the entire city-suburb system bigoted and illegitimate, so there are few local governments that HUD would not be able to slap with a disparate-impact suit on regionalist premises. It’s unlikely that any suburb has a perfect demographic and “asset” balance in every category. All HUD has to do is decide which suburban governments it wants to lean on. With every locality vulnerable to a suit, every locality can be made to play the regionalist game.
Leftist housing activists worry that AFFH never specifies the penalties a suburb will face for imbalances in its housing patterns. These activists just don’t get it. A thoughtful reading of AFFH, including its extraordinary “dialogue” section, makes it clear that HUD can go after any suburb, any time it wants to. The controlling consideration will be politics. HUD has got to boil the frog slowly enough to prevent him from jumping.
It will take time for the truth to emerge. Just by issuing AFFH, the Obama administration has effectively annexed America’s suburbs to its cities. The old American practice of local self-rule is gone. We’ve switched over to a federally controlled regionalist system. Now it’s strictly a question of how obvious Obama and the Democrats want to make this change — and when they intend to bring the hammer down. The only thing that can restore local control is joint action by a Republican president and a Republican congress to rescind AFFH and restrict the reach of disparate impact litigation. We’ll know after November 8, 2016.
- 89831 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


planned freedom
And y'all thought busing was bad.
like a dog on a short leash, live "free" or die bitches
Of course, some "burbs" will be spared, like Malibu, Chapaqua NY, Beverly Hills, the Hamptons etc.
Cuz...ya know ;-)
Obama's Fair Housing is no different than Mugabes land grab and killing of white farmers in Zimbabwe.
Except Obamas sons will slaughter the White Suburbanits.
Lord help us.
Obama wants every white woman impregnated by blacks like his mom was.
Wow, pitting the Feds against EVERY local government in the country?
This is exactly how you incite a rebellion.
Go long live in help and carriage houses in the uber-affluent areas.
And how, pray tell, are already broke municipalities going to pay for this?
ITS NOT ONE MAN!!!!
Its like blaming the evil gun. They all work for the press...lets not be silly.
RIPS
"They" won't be happy until "they" turn the suburbs to shit, just like the inner city.
Water the tree.
The only thing that can restore local control is joint action by a Republican president and a Republican congress to rescind AFFH and restrict the reach of disparate impact litigation. We’ll know after November 8, 2016.
It is too late for that. Republicans have already demonstrated that they won't do shit to stop Obama. Assuming Obama leaves office as expected on January 20, 2017, I have serious doubts Republicans will do anything to reverse the damage Obama has caused.
Further, Obama has filled the federal bureaucracies and courts with his sycophants to carry out his polices long after he is gone. Policies like AFFH will not be stopped until the federal bureaucracies are purged of Obama sycophants. Those sycophants will not voluntarily give up their federal jobs, and emoving these people will be very difficult.
Forward (over the cliff)!
I thought they were called Districts.
One trend that is not being discussed here is the exodus of talent and upper middle class from the USSA. It is slow but the trend is there.
Why should talent to work for little more than the FSA gets.
One of the poorest communities in America is Kiryas Joel, the majority being on welfare. Yet they managed to annex 500 acres of the nearby town in spite of widespread protests. Once .gov is in the mix all reason is gone. They use laws to do as they please. They pick and chose their favorites and abuse the system to bully everybody else.
http://www.dailyfreeman.com/general-news/20150709/kiryas-joel-leaders-se...
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/21/nyregion/kiryas-joel-a-village-with-th...
Since raising black areas to par with white areas hasn't worked despite trillions spent, we will force nice areas to absorb a bunch of them so that they will destroy the white areas too.
Just like education. Can't raise everyone's IQ to the level of white, Asian, and Jewish students, so we will dumb down the curriculum to the lowest common denominator, which is black people.
And this guy is delusional if he thinks a republican is going to fix this. Name ONE time a republican has come in and gotten rid of a terrible law passed by the previous president. Hasn't happened, won't happen, because republican don't give a fuck about you either. This shit isn't going to happen in the hamptons, the elite aren't gong to have section 8 apts built nex to their mansions, this is about getting rid of the true enemy: middle and upper middle class whites. It's already a shrinking group.
"those suburbs could be obligated to nullify their zoning ordinances and build high-density, low-income housing at their own expense."
I think Chief Justice John "it a tax!" Roberts has already paved the way here... why, we just tell them white folks to build free housing and declare that it's a TAX!
Yeah. Problem solved.
All that Obama requires is compliance. Obama will be so much happier when you comply. Your happiness is not of concern, only Obama's.
all the leftist dem voters live where this is targeted..but then diebold machines don't care. it's no obuma the mulatto, it's the plan all along from the halls of CFR and Deep state ..this is much bigger than obuma.
" Change you can bereave in! "
This is reverse discimination, which is DISCRIMINATION.
Forcing suburban communities to subsidize housing so inner city folk can move to the burbs will only bring the crime from the hood to the burbs. It sounds great to an idealist, but in reality human nature isn't going to change and this will only create more division. If you fix the problems in the hood they won't need to relocate to the burbs.
Btw, this policy may turn liberals in California into conservatives cause shit is going to change big time out there if this actually goes into affect. Me, I'm moving to Wyoming.
The world could end and Bruce still wouldn't put his trousers on.
I down voted you because liberals will never become conservatives. Liberals are mentally deficient. Evidence James Cole. They may hate the policy effects personally, but will espouse how wonderful and fair the regs are.
It's not that they are mentally deficient, necessarily, it's that they are raging hypocrites. They follow NIMBY. Like how 'environmentalist' Ted Kennedy shut down a project to built green energy creating wind turbines because he didn't want to be able to see him from his summer house....
Evanston WY is thinkable. 0.16% Diverse, and only 80 miles to Big City culture, too.
And people think I'm crazy for actually thinking that Texas should really secede.
Not just TX. Keep going north and east all the way to the Canadian border and the Atlantic Ocean. We are NOT going to solve these massive problems by sending new politicians to D.C. every 2-4 years. People at the LOCAL and STATE level must stand tall in the face of tyanny and reject the unconstitutional mandates and money that they blindly have been accepting. Imagine the difference if through secession, we eliminated HI,the left coast, new england, NY, NJ, and perhaps a few other states. I for one and others I know don't think of you as crazy at all. It would be a long difficult journey and the D.C. power establishment would fight tooth & nail to prevent it. In the end, it would be worth it!
Obama wants every white woman impregnated by blacks like his mom was.
And this is where ZH continues to go off the rails. Obama, to the extent he asserts any personal beliefs at all, doesn't care about race beyond it's use as a political tool. As for "white culture" (of which I am a member) it's done a fine job destroying itself by continually voting for race baiting politicians who once in office gut and destroy the working class economy with allowed white America to prosper in the first place. Not to mention that black race baiters like Al Sharpton and company would have a little less to work with if there weren't real racists fucking over non-white Americans for a good portion of the past couple of centuries. Sure the "black community" is full of race baiting, welfare state dicks. And sure enough people like Thomas Sowell and others own that fact. But fuck if they didn't get a lot of steering into those roles by our government that ALWAYS wants to set the working man against his brother. His brother of any race.
If we had got over this race bullshit during the 50's when whites in America were prospering beyond belief and really had no reason to keep up the segregation and bullshit, there wouldn't of been a radicalization of black Americans which led to the civil rights movement, which was then perverted in to the welfare state. Anyone distraught with other races or the state of race relations in America can start blaming their own first. Then blame the bankster class that has used racist bullshit to divide and conquer we the people forever. Sadly we keep falling for it.
"Obama wants every white woman impregnated by blacks like his mom was.
And this is where ZH continues to go off the rails."
No, its ONE persons opinion.
/////
Ok, two peoples opinion (looking down)...lol.
Perhaps 8 should have specified the ZH comment section. It's getting ugly in here in regards to the racial stuff. It's such a waste. We're here to bridge divides and wake people up to what's happening with TPTB, or at least we should be. The lowering of the discourse is a bummer. Worse still is that these idiots BELIEVE what they are posting. You could take them to the nicest upper class black neighborhood, and all they'd say is it's the exception that proves the rule. In reality the only rule it proves is that in the absence of government malfeasance, whether through welfare or the drug trade (CIA created the crack epidemic, FACT), black people will rise and fall just like anyone else. So instead of focusing on how the bankster policies of the last 100 years have destroyed opportunity for working people, which affects black disproportionately, we fall right back to the same divided and conquered serfs they want US to be.
Not mad, Just disappointed...
Is it racist that people find themselves in population subsets that for either historical or contrived political reasons find themselves as opponents, each self recognized group pushing their agenda for what they believe is their best interest? I think it is a mistake to equate competition with racism. What we have seen happen over the last fifty years is not just outlawing discrimination but actual retreat or surrender of financial superiority as some type of "justice" which in most cases is direct theft and reverse discrimination. This new Obama agenda is more of the same. Correcting the result, given equality of opportunity has not delivered.
And for those who see Obama as a puppet in this you may be partially correct. I subscribe to the theory that our silent masters see power through destruction of economic prosperity which supports freedom. Obama, as a black nationalist wants to advance what he identifies as his race, and the socialist principals he embraces produce their desired effects. But our silent masters are not for black advancement, they are for destruction and the ultimate empowerment of a tyranny for the ages. Obama is a racist that sees socialism as a tool to advance his agenda. Those using him are allowing his agenda to create the destruction that advances theirs. I don't care about racism. In a free and competitive world I believe that superiority always wins out. I'm willing to compete, but not be forced into submission by a tyrannical government no matter who actually runs it.
This constant push for multicultural remix is destroying the fabric of our civilizations, no families, no local government, no culture......just dictat.
Obama isn't a black nationalist by any stretch of the imagination. Black Nationalism calls for an independent black nation that is economically self sufficient. If anything Obama is a White Supremacist as EVERYTHING he's done weakens the standing of Black Americans with their fellows and makes that unique slice of America known as black culture all the more revoked among whites who might otherwise have only the moderately racist leanings that we all have. Obama has been the worst president for blacks since reconstruction. Calvin Coolidge was one of the best. Free marketeer who didn't want blacks to be given anything more than their rights as Americans. Off topic, yet on topic. Hulk Hogan is being railroaded.
As a child of both ethnicities I've seen racism and stupidity from both sides. It's such a waste. All the while the Banksters enjoy champagne wishes and caviar dreams...
He's a hard core Marxist who comes from a family of Marxists. He panders to blacks and the majority of them vote for him because of his darker skin color and his leftist rhetoric.
For being a hardcore Marxist, he's doing a pretty poor job of getting the means of production into public hands. And those that control capital seems to be doing pretty good. No Obama Red Terror that I can see. He's definitely looking like the Great fascist of the 21st Century though...
Cue the Hakuna Matata song and everything will be all right...
Blacks and cucks like you must be expelled from the US.
Wow, you don't get it. Segregation was established to protect Whites from black dysfunction. Blacks kill and rape White people for fun when given the opportunity. Read the history of Haiti, Rhodesia and South Africa. Google "the Knoxville horror", "the Wichita massacre" and "the Boer Genocide". Have you ever heard of "polar bear hunting" or "knockout kings" played by youths and teens? Did you know 100 White women are raped by Blacks everyday in this country?
Forced segregation by whites was morally wrong and counterproductive. Ironically, "white flight" led to more black dysfunction. The older generations of whites foolishly thought they could live separately forever, it seems. But blacks were not going anywhere, so why not voluntarily accept moral, middle-class, stable black families into the predominatly white culture? Then we could have avoided the explosion of black poverty and dysfunction and could have had ONE stable, moral culture of American people. I wonder if it would have worked.
Desegregation was a bloody hammer that did more harm than good. There is a big difference in outlawing discrimination and actually forcing integration. Ultimately even discrimination lass became a bloody hammer as well as you can no longer fire for cause, deny service or or make any other decision in business that has a black involved without fear of a lawsuit.
Blacks have an average IQ of 85. The number of moral, middle-class, stable blacks is statistically tiny and always has been. The vast majority of blacks are violent jungle savages, statistically. White people have the right to self-preservation, even if this means forcibly separating themselves from a group of people renowned for savage, pointless violence and hatred for "evil Whitey".
What you and other ignorant whites call racism, I call a survival instinct.
Locate yourself in a vibrant community with at least 50% blacks for a year or three.
If you can managed to get through it without being being severely beaten or killed (unlikely), you too will understand what I'm trying to communicate here.
If you haven't had a chance to experience that kind of vibrant diversity first hand then you have no fucking idea what you are talking about (like most diversity advocates).
See, what you wish was true about black people and what is actually true about black Americans is not the same thing.
A little first hand experience goes a long way toward internalizing that, and beign able to throw off a lifetime of false propaganda.
Southerners knew this shit 150 years ago, but you sanctimonious do-gooding northerners had to use force to make us live your way.
Welcome to the future muthafuckaz. Y'all bitchez be beggin for yo redneck cuzzins to bail your frail whimpy asses out of the mess you made.
But I say FUCK NO.
You know shit about about black people obviously. There are enclaves in Houston that are "vibrantly" black that you couldn't afford. There is nothing inherently wrong with black people despite your racist bullshit. That's been so far disproven I will not bother to debate it. First blacks dater off as slaves in this Country. Then the asshole's southerners you mention decided to take their civil war beefs out on ultimately defenseless black people (Rosewood,etc) for the better part of a century. This was followed by the introduction of the welfate state and the drug war that disproportionately hurt blacks as they were lowest on the economic ladder. And let's not forget globalization dragging ALL ethnicities wages into the toilet. So yeah, a lot of black people are messed up. And .gov sure as shit helped them get that way and has tried to keep them there from the moment they got off the boat. And it has served as a wonderful side show to distract White America from how the system is fucking ALL OF US over.
But hey, I guess "fuck the niggers, it's all their fault" is just so much easier a concept to get behind...
Liberal white fools deserve to have had the knock out game played on them on a daily basis.
Who on ZH genuinely works in politics? Who on ZH has ever spoken to high ranking officials in federal law enforcement, politicians, policy makers, or foreign serving diplomats stationed in the U.S, while the civil rights, black panther, nation of Islam, Black power movement was taking place during that period? Most of the Chimpout and Dailystormers who have infested ZH, are as clueless on this issues, as they were when these same fools originally supported the Ukraine over Russia. I and a few others told these fucking inbreds then, they were being played and it took a minority of us on these forums, 3 fucking weeks to explain to their thick heads, what was really going on and who was pulling the strings. That it took almost 3 weeks to explain to them the intricacies of the politics being played out, was not what I found most upsetting. What was most upsetting is that they couldn't see it in the fucking first place. Given the IQ of most foot-soldiers is around 100, they can be forgiven. But alas the same blinkered mindset is alive and well on the issue of race.
Well here is quick synopsis of the general consensus by the policy makers, politicians and foreign diplomats who observed it. From the mid 50's, 60's and 70's (THE STATE) systematically set about to destroy what they feared as Black power, Black cohesion and Black self-reliance. We went after their intellectual backers, their financial backers, their leaders, their deputies, high profile followers and the most independent and radical followers. We bribed, incarcerated (by fair and foul means) and when necessary, killed, in order to stop the rise of black independence, as we believed if allowed to flourish in the U.S.A, it would have spread globally and for those who understand the importance of Africa and its resources to our wealth and our strategic control of rare earth metals, including the loss of financial control. Then it is easy to understand our logic in crushing the African Americans. In hindsight it has been disastrously counter productive and had a devastating effect on the black community as can be witnessed today, essentially leaving the rudderless.
But there is hope. In the background away from the news, there are new groups, who are well funded to the tune of $100’s million of dollars(Yes you read that correct) of Black nationalists who are predominately Right Wing, who are extremely anti-welfare, self-reliant and understand implicitly the black community have to fix themselves by themselves. Given the global impact if blacks got themselves together, do you believe the powers that be will encourage and help them, or set about to undermine and destroy it? Just the notion of Black Power/Black-independence in the 50’s and 60’s sent us into a paranoid frenzy. I wonder what the narrative will be on Fox News when the new generation become visible? The question I ask is, will the race haters on ZH, welcome this development when it becomes more visible, or will we bite off our nose to spite our faces and oppose it?
I call bullshit.
Black nationalist as self reliant right-wingers? Have you listened to anything they have said? They embrace redistribution, not out of socialist fervor, but use it as an excuse to enable "economic justice". Redistribution as retribution. And no, they are not all simply vengeful but see this redistribution as necessary for their advancement as a race....RACE. More cronyism to enable advancement.
While I am 62 years old, I will not claim historian status on all political issues especially regarding race, but there can be little doubt that the dependency of blacks (and increasingly everyone else) has been a deliberate policy of the left, and now we see it embraced by the republicans as well. It is the virus of central control that we must ALL be dependents to gain our adherence and most importantly compliance. The Democrats espoused their belief that it was the christian thing to do, to keep blacks "on the plantation" for their own good, providing them work and shelter as the caring thing to do, prior to the civil war, and ever since.
When we see blacks in the streets, rejecting all forms of entitlements....then I might concur. Until then, blacks, like all of the rest, will be forced to blame others for appealing to their weaknesses, their desire for something for nothing, their need to take the easy path fraught with disasters. We can make no adequate excuse for those who seek to manipulate and ultimately enslave us, but neither can we excuse ourselves after countless thousands of years that we fall for their same old tricks, time after time.
There's a difference between Black Nationalists and Black Communists. The former are more right wing leaning to a point. However ultimately, like the Democrats, Republicans and any other political entities, there principals go only as far as they can benefit them. Black Panthers, etc, Just have a smaller audience.
The thing is you never here from the productive Black members of the upper and middle classes as they're to busy being productive. Maxine Waters, Al Sharpton and company are the only people who get any airtime. Them and the Obama phone lady. They never show the brothers working at Magic Johnson's theatres in Inglewood. Or the millions if Black people who DON'T live in majority Black neighborhoods Who just want to he left alone and don't make race an issue.
Inglewood is majority Hispanic with almost 53% of the city's population. So are only "brothers" working at Magic Johnson's theatres in Inglewood?
Liberal white fools deserve to have the knock out played on them on a daily basis.
The discussion was the condition of members of the black community both real and perceived. Mexicans aren't germane to the conversation. It was Just the quickest example I could think of black entrepenurship and those that benefit from it. But that said, tragedy sells and as long as the only thing you see on TV is black criminality it's a perpetuating cycle of perception that ends up defining the reality to an extent.
When you open your eyes and realize that Frank Marshall Davis is the biological father, that statement does take on a whole new meaning.
Cosmos, no joke, yesterday Mugabe invited the white farmers to come back and farm as the population is starving to death.
lol. Seeds, sun, dirt and water. Simple. If they can't figure that out ~ Darwin wins again.
Brawndo?
Firewall Detroit from civilization and within a decade they could uninvent the wheel.
True, Mr. Dershowitz et al will circle the wagons and get an exemption from the program. Leave it to the middle class to shoulder the burden, same as everything else in this country. Don't worry old Pants Suit will watch out for us when she (he?) gets the title with Kaitlen as VP.
I live in NH. This won't fly here. HUD? What's that? You are either a property owner and tax payer or a renter. My town has one apartment building, with about 8 units in it. There are always tatted and pierced up layabouts laying about whenever I go by. It's a frequent call out spot for our police department. The HUD money isn't worth price.
The HUD money isn't worth price.
But it is, only to the politicians that accept it.
where does it stop?
next we'll be sharing the remote.
or toothbrushes...
would that be enough?
prolly not...
Until at least one State refuses federal funds and tells DC to "fuck-off" - it won't stop.
It stops at the Home Invasion and the raping of your wife and daughters in front of you before they behead you.
Ding! Ding! Ding!
It already happens in Detroit.
Gang RAPISTS ‘made boyfriends watch’
http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=5...
That;s what I call vibrant!
What decent God fearing White American man wouldn't want to expand his sex lifwith a little mythical BBC gang raping his wife.
America? FUCK YEAH!
The perpetrators were black as were the rape victims.
Republicans will not resist anything that to do so would label them as racists or haters. The least popular populists. We are doomed. Financially repressed and will go along with anything as long as the checks keep showing up.
it ends when those who own the planet feel like there are no more useless eaters to get rid of
What this does is hurt the inner city redeveloper. If I buy and rehab inner city homes only to have tax benefitted low income homes built in the 'burbs, I am going to stop and let the inner cities rot. What is the govt trying to do?
One little two little three little scumbags
four little five little six little scumbags
seven little eight little nine lttle scumbags
ten little bought for clowns.
Hey further diversify and kill 2 birds with one brick by dropping a load of rednecks on Death Row into black neighborhoods and save taxpayers at least the cost of one of them there lethal injection thingies, man.
.
My black lab is racist, hates black folk, don't come here
There is a simple solution to this, but it will be a bitter pill for municipalities to swallow....just don't accept the block grant dollars.
Muni's have suckled at the teat of .gov for too long, time to wean yourself off the dollars that now have bigger and bigger strings attached.
The 'plan' is to get us all trapped in cities where they can control our access to food and water...then genocide us.
That is one of Agenda 21s goals {heard the pigs into one big pen.}
What HUD funds do the average affluent suburb receive?
Or even the average not-so-affluent suburb.
Surprised I had to scroll this far down to read this.
Are you kidding? Liberals are constantly pushing to build "affordable housing" in affluent areas. That always involves HUD dollars.
Bring on the hood rats.
Come on gang lets sing along!
Scooby Dooby Doo where are you?
I'm hiding from the hood rats.
And Scooby Dooby Doo why would you do (that).
Obama makes my skin crawl.
. . . and scooby doo if it comes true you'll find yourself a scooby doo hat.
Just wait. Gun one Hoody down on your front lawn and the next day 500 Hoodies show up. Good luck, huh?
By living next door to you they will steal your guns while you are away at work and they lounge around the porch looking at their EBT cards your tax dollars will charge up.
They are going to break into your safe with an EBT card ?
Safe, its not like they have to drag it very far back to their place lol. A good hot oxyacetylene torch can do wonders. Or they can make your wife or daughters open it before they rape them.
http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/wichita_massacre.htm
Well, I hope this craziness does not happen, but if so.....I am feeling good about the odds.
Bro, this HAS HAPPENED ALREADY. Google almost any small to medium sizied town -- not even suburbs -- for low income housing. You will find HUD apartments buildings and section 8s. It's fucking everywhere like a cancer.
Chimp out. Coming to your town.
Already Has!
I don't know if the US government knows this or not, but it's broke, aka insolvent. It should really stop trying to expand its powers and its reach AND it should get used to doing more and more with less and less. It should focus on economic / legislative fundamentals and work with local and state governments which are also effectively insovlent for the most part, to serve the basic needs of citizens where they are currently living. They should not be in the business of grand societal experimentation, unless approved by the public. One day, when each citizens gets to vote on each and every single law via the internet, things will be different.
Are you telling us to stop mowing our lawns in protest?
Soon all your lawns will be replaced with vegetable gardens because people can't afford to buy food at the supermarket.
Victory (gardens)!
Did you guys know that Ross Perot was proposing direct democracy via internet back in 92? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Perot#1992_presidential_candidacy) .. I was pretty young back then and only noticed this in retrospect when on a wikipedia bender. Oh what could have been.
Direct democracy? Are you nuts? Low information voters combined with a totally biased media?
Try searching for Mark Dice on You Tube and watch a few videos. Then get back to me on your view of direct democracy after.
I get your guys' concerns about direct democracy I really do, and I do have a lot of experience with the sorry state of affairs with intelligence of american public. But I do also meet a lot of really sharp people as well, who I feel are capable of participating in it effectively. And I also have experience with an anarchic kind of system that's self organizing and has direct democracy (open source software) that has turned out really well. I think it's fun to try to imagine an electronic direct-democracy system that could work.
What if it worked like this: as a citizen you pay a flat tax ( % of income) and that's the only tax, and then you login to a website where you get to allocate your tax contribution to whatever you want. I suppose you'd also get to vote as to what the flat tax percentage for citizens would be, and could make a suggestion as to a "Slot" for other people to allocate to. De-emphasis on picking representiatives who make choices for you. Just vote with your dollars, use the e-voting system to pick what you want to spend it on. I dunno I'm not a political science egghead but it seems feasible and fair to me, better than just picking people who get to make choices for me.
The reason representative democracy bugs me is that it's so antiquated. It's designed for an era before public literacy and mail or any long distance communication were widely available. Like in the old days when you need to handle business afar you send your son or nephew in your stead... I think we're way past that and need to at least try to come up with something better.
Direct democracy is fine as long as it is constitutionally restrained....which is what we are supposed to have....constitutional restraint to prevent "democracy" from stripping us of our individual rights. We can agree that to have a functioning society we must surrender some rights, but this must be voluntary. Otherwise, democracy becomes tyranny of the majority where NO individual rights will be retained. Our elected representatives were supposed to be the educated class with a conscience to prevent this runaway tyranny from happening, with a SCOTUS to guarantee it. We now see we have none of it. Your pure democracy would make sure we never got it back. Mob rule.
Direct democracy itself is ancient. As in ancient Athens. Everyone that could vote (male, citizen, & property owner as I recall) was part of the polis and got a vote. They voted on everything. Who would be the general in the upcoming battle. And when the general won, but didn't win big enough, he was banished, by majority vote.
On a certain small scale it might be ok, say about 500 voters, but nothing larger.
It's kinda like the b 24 bomber factory at Willit run mich. once they got it going it was spitting 4 engine bombers 20! A day. It was still making them after the war was over. Takes them a long time to shut things down , even thier own demise
Maybe some town will decide that since they have few dole bludgers and little need for the troubles they bring, it is easier to lose the HUD grants. Then the Feds will just change the rule so that these "racist" communities lose their MRAPs, library subsidies, congressional pork, etc. Of course, they will still have to pay Federal taxes.
One of the nice things about dollar collapse is that it will make it easier for communities everywhere to give the Feds the finger. No more financial puppet strings. What good is the power of the purse, when the money is worthless?
"One day, when each citizens gets to vote on each and every single law via the internet, things will be different."
Things will be worse. The FSA, libtards, eco-kooks and anti-gunners will team up and vote themselves whatever they can dream up. It's democracy. Will of the majority says you must work and support Laquantisha and Pablo who have been oppressed by history and can't work. It's only fair. Have a soma.
It is a moral problem; it is why we have immoral leaders; we are an immoral people. Immorality is celebrated in every facet of our society. People rationalize it away by using their relative moral bias mixed with emotion as a substitute for critical thinking. Without a fix moral compass the nation has died; abandoned by God, the living and true God who is the Christ.
Moar voting. Harder! Faster!
At the turn of the century 1899-1900, European descent Whites were 40% of the worlds population and the three largest cities in the world were Paris, London and NYC.
At the turn of the century 1999-2000 European White decent people were only eight percent of the worlds population and having less than four percent of the worlds babies.
Today the worlds three largest cities are Mumbai India, Mexico City Mexico and Sau Paulo Brazil.
White couples need to marry earlier and try to have at least three kids each, or the white race is doomed.
Oldskool: Wife and two kids, house in the suburb, car, and some modern conveniences
Newskoo: "Partner" and test-tube baby, apartment in the city, and cameras and chips up your bunghole
Better, right??
Utopia at last?
You left off the moder woman's carreer path:
college>cock carousel>career>wall>IVF>divorce rape
Good, could we please start the first ghetto project in the Hamptons'and Bel Air. This has got to be the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
They will only enforce this on the middle class neighborhoods.Get ready to rumble boys cause they are going to force us to fight each other in a cage match. And you think its hard to sell your house now? better start geting a buyer now cause Leroy pimpin hoes and crack in the project across the street just destroyed that. The whole nation will be Detroit.
And WTF is Texas playing along with this crap for?
I just wonder after everything that has happened why is the Middle Class tax base hated so much.
Little pieces of paper has destroyed the country.
The suburbs aren’t designed for urbanites. The nearest grocery store to me is more than a mile.
The next thing will be free transportation for the transplanted so they can get around.
We must sink lower!!!
6 miles for a gallon of milk for me.. Chickens are just too quick to milk...
Uber Drivers will drive them around using some type of government transportation voucher.
Break it down. We all work against each other when. Section 8 Housing is proof.
But I get what you mean. Caro MI is rural, yet still housing illegals. You're lucky.
The driverless car will be the Obama car and if you want to drive, the insurance will be so high that only the very wealthy, asset or income wealthy, will be able to drive. With that said, they will be easy targets for those whoare envious.
That's one reason why my wife and I picked our neighborhood. Sha'ni'qu'a' can't get here on public transportation.
Sha'ni'qu'a'?
Have you met Erica?
http://www.egotripland.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/airwrecka-mcbride1...
Airwrecka... Airwrecka Mcbride, hey Xit, what you got against the Irish??
Wow. Thanks for the reminder. In Hawaii we're being invaded by Micronesians. They get free tickets to Hawaii and some kind of super welfare that features new pick-ups and lots of canned beer. The local barman asked me one day, "if we atomic bombed their island, how come they're here ?"---my reply ? ---Poor Aiming-- ( rim-shot ). Supposedly their Island got "taminated" from some Atomic Tests. Oh, and they go to school. they can't speak English, but they go to school; and reproduce like mice. Obviously, Washington politicians don't live in Hawaii.
Parent, LMAO.
Won't happen, depopulation and war is more fun and profitable for the global mentally ill.
Obama collecting personal data for a secret race database July 18, 2015
That infrastrucuture will be used those that use it will have names, addresses...
Yes, if we could only prove that ALL white Americans ARE RACISTS.
The best part is that as the ONLY source of this data, there is no rebuttal, no means of fighting it in a court of law OR public opinion.
we are watching today as both are demanding stricter gun laws because of a nut shooting up a (gun free) theater.
As is typical of Statists, their desire is to use the actions of a very small minority to justify the relief of freedoms from the masses. No discussion of mental health and prescription drug issues. No discussion of defenseless people as victims because their government has done everything in their power to make them such. Multi millions of weapons out there, the vast majority in responsible hands, all to be outlawed and restricted to use or purpose, while crazies and those of criminal intent will have even greater liberties. Everything we need to ensure societal destruction.
The last thing a centrally controlled government wants is people who provide for themselves. Dependency IS THEIR THEME.
DUH. Any organization that takes grants with strings from any department of any government is terminally insane.
Of course they all do, because the "leaders" don't care what happens to everyone else (the ones they supposedly represent). Plus, leaders move away to nicer digs after they destroy the areas they totally screwed.
The role of Congress is only to give the illusion that a US Constitution exists. One example, Obama has not had to veto anything despite that Republicans control both houses. Both parties are one in the same and not relevant. Another example, they get directly involved in the name of a football team, the Washington Redskins, while they fund a killing machine called the Apache helicopter.
If you're white and you voted for 0bama, you're a total fucking asshole.
I upvoted you, even though I am a total fucking asshole by your standard. I voted in 2008, after eight years of Bush (remember 2000-2008? Wasn't GWB a great president?)
By 2012, I realized my mistake, and will likely never vote again, except maybe for Trump, who, as my track record thus far indicates, will win and become a more vile, meaner leader than Hitler.
Just the way I roll...
I'm voting Trump. My entire family is too. Trump would stop this HUD madness.
pfff Trump would expedite the thing for fun and profit. and win a second term doing it.
Trump is to Presidential campaigns as Lee Harvey Oswald is to assassinations.
Dude,
If you're black and you voted for Obama you're a total fucking asshole.
Got nothing to do with color.
Not really an asshole by any usual definition; just suffering from a little "white guilt", caused by the media opiinion formers, and a brilliant dis-information-propaganda campaign, also known as "an election campaign".
Obama and both the Demonrats and the GOP actions and INaction demonstrates the VERY precarious position Whites are in here in the USSA.
We have to face realities, not Liberal pipe-dreams...We have to face the fact that the world is a bloody battleground, not a children's playground; and that our enemies are devils, not angels. A war is being waged, a war to the death, and it is being waged against us -- not against anybody else, but against us!
WHITE MAN, THINK AGAIN! by Anthony Jacob, Johannesburg 1965
What happens to all the minority laws when the skin color of the minority is white? We are near that point.
@Crocodile
You know you ask a very good question. It has already been answered, however, by Obama, when a reporter asked him when will Affirmative Action end, he answered: "NEVER!"
Throughout the West in general, as matters stand at present, the Liberal Cant is established and sacrosant, and we, the White race (though not, of course, any other race), are on the defensive and being compelled to find moral justification for our very existence. Nevertheless the Liberal Cant, being cant, cannot long endure. Racially we have no need to share the gloom of a Spengler provided we cherish our own wonderful, sane, unique and matchlessly beautiful race as it deserves, and refuse to debase it or deny it its rightful self-expression. It is wholly insufferable that we, including our children, should be held to account for our feelings and statements even in our own native lands. We were not born for the purpose of apologising for our existence, to be snaffled and curbed and muzzled like dangerous beasts when everyone else including savages have the freedom to do and say whatever they please, including the freedom to revile us racially without the least fear of being accused of racialism. It is wholly insufferable; yet this is what is happening, and it is the exact measure of our decline.
WHITE MAN, THINK AGAIN! by Anthony Jacob, Johannesburg 1965
"Disadvantaged Persons" is now the term replacing minority and women owned business on contracts for municiple work in cities where minorities are the majority. They got this shit covered already.
They've got it more than covered... it's historically disadvantaged persons.
When you use taxation for social experimentation, is the "taxes pay for society" gambit still used?
this nigger family needs your house so move out!
Da longa youse stays in youse house da less bucks you gonna get for it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq__Z-Z_Ofs
There will always be suburbs because there will always be white flight when crap like this happens.
Suburb ---> Ghetto ---> New Suburb ---> New Ghetto, etc
You can't make people stay in one place. They'll just leave...and if a new suburb can't be built due to a government building-regulation people will just head out to the country and home-school their kids. They won't sit idly by and live in a ghetto.
These suburban niggas won't turn into soccer moms and offer to take my kids to practice, they'll just fuck up the neighborhood as they always do because dey niggas.
Liberalism is nothing but destruction.
Dat racciss, Mr. Hammer, but, I agree 10000000000000%.
I recently moved from what used to be a very nice suburb, which has become a negro, immigrant shithole, to a pretty rural area, and I realized, that in the two months that I've been in the new area, the only people that I've had issues with happend to be BLACK PEOPLE.
Sorry to say it, but the civil rights movement has been a massive, epic FAIL.
Niggers are still niggers, even though we aren't allowed to say NIGGER, NIGGER, NIGGER anymore.
Fuck Obama, and he's only a half-nigger.
"You can't make people stay in one place."
You don't get it. You really don't get it.
So a fair amount of diversity is provided to each sub-state area, you will be told where to live. Welcome to your new Section 8 bedroom that you and your wife share with a Guatamalan family.
They can tell me all they want and I will disobey.
Lots of people in the USSR and Mao's China said the same thing. Denial is powerful, and is usually the first, all, and next to last sentiment. Acceptance of reality is usually the last thing we do.
Those being forced from the suburbs will in ways mimic the East Prussian flight in WWII. At least we'll have cars and not have to go on foot.
All we need is Love love, Love is all we need.
"Given the GOP is the last resort for conservatives, I like Kevin McDonald’s plan… Republican Party: tear this bitch down."
Cuckservative by Gregory Hood
At a time when the Republican Party ostensibly controls Congress, President Obama is unilaterally enacting racially charged policies on immigration, housing, and law enforcement that will have incalculable consequences for ordinary Americans–and there has been no real resistance from the majority party. The only notable thing the Republican-controlled legislature has done is pass a secret trade agreement that has the effect of enabling more immigration–“the worst bill Congress has ever passed,” in the words of Phyllis Schlafly. On top of all this, Justice John Roberts–appointed by George W. Bush–has cemented the legitimacy of Obamacare...And since cuckservatives no longer bother concealing they care nothing for their own white supporters, frustrated whites are looking for alternatives.
The 21st century will be the Century of Identity, as ethnopolitics in the multicultural West replaces the phony Left/Right divisions of the past. While American conservatism knowingly and consciously subordinates the interests of its supporters to a suicidal “moral” vision, the successful political movements of the future will confidently assert the legitimate interests of its members.
#cuckservative: A person who wishes for America's return to 1950s values/strength, without admitting the nation was 90% white then…
— Paul Kersey (@sbpdl) July 23, 2015
The #cuckservative buys into all of the Left's key premises & worships the Left's heroes, then is genuinely surprised when his side loses.
— Trainspotter (@Trainspotter001) July 23, 2015
But! Still bullshit talk! Haven't met a conservative yet, outside of NH, who can walk the talk! Bullshit is still bullshit. You suck up to that game, you ain't living a real life.
We all want to be cared and provided for, its just that most in the past were not willing to pay the cost. It has not been until the last 70 years or so that they have been able to convince the majority that those cost will be borne by others, so as to not worry of cost.
Free lunch is free until you find during digestion that your appearance has been requested in the dish washing area.
this is the list of "annexed" towns in the U.S.S.A
https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=FY2015CapFundAlloca...
~DipshitMiddleClassWhiteKid