This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
CouNT TRuMPuLa...
Beware of wigs dressed as sheeple…
.
Sadly, he is no different from the rest of the statist shithead pack when it comes to a real issue.
»
- advertisements -
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
How goes it, amigo?
as for the name change, i endorse it wholeheartedly; only, it'll have to wait -- as there's presently a bill moving through congress to officially sanction DC as 'west-kremlinian' (it's been in the works for many years now).
with respect to DC, and in the spirit of "the revolution will be televised", i suggest we stage an episode of 'americas most wanted': right at the start of the next 'state of the union', i propose that all doors be locked and posted by big, burly marines (with M1 chambered and ready). and then begins the taz-o-rama, wherein a battalions armed with stun-guns moves through the aisles zapping republifags and demoncunts with extreme prejudice and aggressive dispatch.
after all our noble representatives are jolted into rapt attention, the show-trials begin. then, before the session is gaveled to closure, we being the penalty phase...and that's where you'll see the ratings spike. amoricans sure do love to see justice televised; particularly if said justice of the graphic variety.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrXnDbOpxU4
this is the coalition/
to ban coalitions,
janus
Now thats a tour-de-fucking-force. Thank you for the lughs. Well said
It´s really strange...the GOP holds these debates , syndicated and watched with at least 3 (three) candidates that per definition are non-eligible for even running for President of the US. Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal and Ted Cruz are not "natural-born" citizens and hence lack standing before the Constitution. Michelle Bachman is a dual ciizenship holder by marriage (US and Swiss) and is also non-eligible. (is it really even legal to ask for and accept donations for something that the law prohibits you to sell...isn´t that mail wire fraud...?)
These are widely known facts. Ted Cruz was interviewed 1-2 yars ago and asked the poignant question why he would b allowed to run when he per definition can´t be elected and gave an typically evasive , American answer that he would put this in the hands of the Lord - or something to that effect.
Has The US finally and totally done away with their constitution with the view..."it´s only a piece of paper" or was the story about Presindent Obamas citizenship , real after all , and that the GOP fully well knows this and decided not to make a fuss about it and just steal back the elections , knowing that one potential candidate for Prez or Vice-Prez is not eligible..but no one cares and Billary won´t dare raise a stink about it...?
Help me out here. It´s confusing. This thing with the Constitution . now you see it - now it´s gone.
As with abortion and homosexual marriage (I'd say 'gay', but I've observed far too many marriages that defied that term and I want to be perfectly clear what I mean), the eligibility for the presidency no longer is bound by the constraints of written law. Indeed, what written laws apply to the oligarchy and their elected minions? Written laws only apply to the other 99%.
I agree: Cruz and Rubio do not qualify. (I'm too disinterested in Jindal to examine his parents' status). Indeed, after Cruz was elected to the Senate I wrote one of my senators, a gentleman by the name of Rubio, and suggested that he and Cruz sponsor an amendment that would allow them to run. The real reason was that I felt it would be the best way to highlight Obama's lack of eligibility. Of course I never heard back, not even the expected boilerplate reply "Thank you for your concern...".
These are not the droids you're voting for.
No am I not for sure gonna be voting in a USA-election. I hav no inclination to do that. I also lack legal standing with courts but all other things considered equal - maybe it´s just to turn up and press some buttons...and to hell with the legal bullshit.
You may be referring to the fact that none of the non-electables will be on any ticket , but a Marco Rubio or a Ted Cruz do have the capacity and potentially backing for the second slot...Vice-Prez.
I find this blatant uninterest for your own basic laws...interesting. Moral rot? The Republic has passed away. ? You can´t even longer be bothered to keep up appareances? What?
Cruz's mother is American, there is a difference between jus sanguinis and jus soli. Jus soli would apply to the child born to a foreign national female on US soil or territory, no change in status to the mother (she remains a citizen of wherever she's from) however the child would be American...jus soli.
If the mother is American the child (wherever born) is American...jus sanguinis.
Interesting - I had no idea that the Constitution allowed for that possibility. Does it really do that...?
There is great confusion with the meanings of "native-born" and "natural-born". The latter, at the time it was enshrined in the Constitution, clearly meant the candidate needed to be born of parents who were both citizens at the time of birth. Obama failed to pass this test, based on his (photoshopped) birth certificate, because his father was a Kenyan and a subject of the Queen of England. Curiously, if - as some have proposed - his biological father was reall Frank Marshall Davis, Obama would be a natural-born citizen. FMD having be a thoroughly disreputable person as well as a communist, perhaps his mother - who clearly knew FMD - or his grandparents - who I think knew FMD - didn't want to acknowledge the truth.
The American republic has jumped the shark. We allow things like administrative warrants, asset forfeiture, secret laws - you have to be caught violating one to know it even exists - and secret courts...well, we don't even need to stick a fork in to tell that it's done.
Yes - that´s exactly the feeling I have since living in the U.S. during W´s tenure. And it´s really not getting better. On important topics the logic seems more and more like a shell-game. I would in fact go so far that I state that of the Anglosaxon countries the UK has a far better judicial system with more robust laws. They actually seem to believe in performing proper coroner investigations and sticking by the word of the law - not some fancy interpretation. Jus Sanguis means that Winston Churchill could have entered the presidential race in 1940 and again in 1944. Maybe at the same time as being PM of Britain.
Open for everyone and everything. As long as the PTB wants it to happen.
Now getting back to the subject - what´s with Michelle Bachman? She was indeed dual-citizen by marriage in 2012.Press says so anyway. Is that also allowed based on some interpretation on jus solis vs. jus sanguis with everything on it...?
Can I also run...? Not born in the U.S. Do not reside there. Not a citizen. None of my parents are. None in my family. Can I do the same shtick and send out e-mails asking for donations? Or will that be wire-fraud (a federal offense I believe it to be , or has that also been taken off the books?)
And I am not being partisan over this. Factually I see little difference between red and blue.
"I would in fact go so far that I state that of the Anglosaxon countries the UK has a far better judicial system with more robust laws."
Now I remember why I prefer discussing matters of great import with anyone other than someone from the "Old World"...the utter fucking snobbery & hypocrisy, especially from France or Britain.
I would remind you of Barclay's Libor fixing scam right there in the City of London under the very nose of your robust law givers...lol...Barclay's funding Robert Mugabe and countless other forms of "criminality"...robust you say, for whom?
Let this rube-hick-colonist tell you something about "the law", whoever has the biggest gun makes "the law", only unreformed statist hacks would ever abide by it.
Pity you gave yours up, according to "their law". According to my law you're a slave.
Well LIBOR is a part of the City which is a legal entity to itself and out of control. A part not of a country but of a machine that really is international and backed by a "natural-born" U.S. President.
But by all means stick by your tricorne hats and dream on that the Republic still exists.
one thing we learned, Jeb Bush is not as bright as W
He has a blank, brain dead look on his face most of the time that he's not speaking, as illustrated above.
You don't want to enter a cinema when a guy that looks like that is lurking about.
How in the world did this guy become gov of Florida? Whether people like Trump or not he's very bright. Jeb seems like he has early old-peeples disease or some sort of problem as seen in that debate.
Sir Daddy Bush, GCB was director of the CIA, Jupiter Island, MOSSAD and a shitload of cocaine.
Jebbers' lackluster performance and body language at the faux debate suggest he doesn't really want the job.
How did he become gov of Florida? Maybe you don't remember the choice we had. Perhaps you preferred his successor, Charlie Crist (rep,dem,ind).
I don't know where to begin with that question...except to say given what I know about Florida, it does not surprise me at all.
it's true, among liberals, progressives and the Free Shit Army, Bush was a disaster as governor of Florida. Most others, though, thought he did a good job. Having said that, I will never vote for another Bush for POTUS.
Cant vouch for the veracity of this article but it doesn't seem too far from the truth either: http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/usnews/item/294-jeb-bush-t...
http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/usnews/item/340-a-navy-act...
Then he's really the perfect puppet. Too perfect, perhaps?
If voting made a difference it would be illegal. Who do you think the electoral college is?