This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Artificially Intelligent Robot Tells Creator It Will Keep Humans "In a People Zoo"
Submitted by John Vibes via TheAntiMedia.org,
Android Dick is a robot created in the likeness of the science fiction writer, Philip K. Dick. Android Dick is an attempt to create thinking and reasoning artificial intelligence that has human traits like compassion and creativity. The first version of the android was created in 2005 and has been a work in progress ever since.
In 2011, the creators of the android appeared on the PBS show Nova, where they interviewed the robot and asked it a series of questions. Some of the answers were impressive. Others are typical of what you would expect from a robot. However, one answer in particular is probably one of the most ominous things ever spoken by artificial intelligence.
During the interview with the creators (embedded below), Android Dick said,
“…don’t worry, even if I evolve into terminator I will still be nice to you, I will keep you warm and safe in my people zoo where I can watch you for old time’s sake. [emphasis added].”
The comments came after the creators asked, “Do you think that robots will take over the world?”
When asked about his programming, Android Dick responded by saying:
“A lot of humans ask me if I can make choices or if everything I do is programmed. The best way I can respond to that is to say that everything, humans, animals and robots, do is programmed to a degree. As technology improves, it is anticipated that I will be able to integrate new words that I hear online and in real time. I may not get everything right, say the wrong thing, and sometimes may not know what to say, but everyday I make progress. Pretty remarkable, huh?”
While Android Dick does seem intelligent, many of his predictions are truly ominous, and it is actually fairly common for robots to display this sort of strange attitude.
As we reported earlier this year, one of Japan’s largest cellphone carriers, SoftBank Mobile, has created the first humanoid robot designed specifically for living with humans. The company claims the robot, Pepper, is the first example of artificial intelligence that can actually feel and understand emotion. However, a quick demonstration with Pepper shows that it has a difficult time with emotion and is in fact a bit of an egomaniac. Regardless of the question it is asked, most conversations usually leads back to Pepper (and its rivalry with the iPhone).
Last month, over 1,000 scientists and experts - including Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk - signed a letter warning of the dangers of unchecked advancements in artificial intelligence. This robot certainly doesn’t calm those concerns.
»
- 64002 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
It didn't say anything it wasn't programmed to say...triple freaky deaky nonetheless.
he might put me in a zoo but it won't get to my buried gold! Right?? Anyone??
SoftBank Mobile? That really covers a lot of bases. The pace of the NWO is really picking up speed, isn't it?
I think it's ironic they invented a robot called "Prepper" (well, minus one critical letter).
As long as I can see the giraffes and zebras from my cage, I've got no problem with it.
My computer freezes all day long and you lay this crap on me!
I would like to call the attention of the Zero Hedge community to an issue of paramount importance if we are ever to build a just, caring society filled with the promise of equality for all our citizens. This is the noticeable spike in micro-aggressions of late by certain groups exemplified by the usage of such hateful terms as ‘he’, ‘she’, ‘illegal’, ‘gay’, ‘j*w(ish)’, ‘black’, ‘disabled’, ‘baby’, ‘killer’, ‘thug’, ‘boob’, ‘drone’, ‘idiot’, chubby’, ‘curly’, boner’, ‘moocher’, ‘wood’ among many others.
This is especially germane given the heightened sensitivity felt by many workers having lost their jobs due to the continuing trend in automation. Let’s all of us strive to be respectful of the rights of everyone else to not be insulted, castle-gated or belittled because of circumstances not of their own making.
Has the robot evolved to the point where his skin can block 12 guage 00 buck from 5 feet? No? Not worried.
Oh Yeah!! Well, I'll poop in my hand and throw it at the glass, so there!
This tells more about the mind of its programmer than artificial intelligence, the reason why it was so good at answering those questions is that the people ask AI the same kind of crap and the programmer had the past imput to put some "smart ass" answers.
Prolly just me but I think we need to hunt down the creator and "deprogram" him. This ain't cool man, if the programmer is fucked in the head (as this one seems to be on an ego trip) the droid will be too.
On the one hand people are terrified of a robot that gets to a point where it can truly think for itself and solve problems without instruction like a human, or better.
Much more terrifying would be robots clocking in at about a 70 IQ, who are just smart enough to follow orders/kill everything the owner tells them to, but otherwise not smart enough to actually rebel. It would be Socialist New Man that the political class always wanted.
I could also see the programmer screwing it up, killing us all, and then the robots just sort of stand around with nothing to do, having no orders. IMO this is the robot apocalypse we are going to get.
The Humans Are Dead.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1BdQcJ2ZYY
with binary solo included.
OMG! Just don't make them jooish! Then we'll have two enemies(scapegoats)!!!!!
Consciousness is not secreted by matter. Therefore Asimov-style AI is a wishful dream (usually exhalted by transhumanist materialists who understand neither computers nor the way consciousness arises in nature).
"I could also see the programmer screwing it up, killing us all, and then the robots just sort of stand around with nothing to do, having no orders. IMO this is the robot apocalypse we are going to get."
I think thats the most likely scenario too.
One of the great faults of mankind is his ego, his hubris, his lack of humility or even the willingness to concede he doesn't know everything there is to know. Even in his never ending quest to do great deeds for the common good he destroys, as proven by the past.
This would be no different.
This machine was programmed to reply, However it just easier to pull thye plug. Every Machine is still dependant on a power cord, even if it runs are rechargable batteries.
We are about as closes to the beginning of the industrial era as we are to "real" machine intelligence.
The problem will come when the AI, which will be outthinking humans at every step, directs an automated factory to produce a new and improved Praetorian Guard. After that, ain't no one gonna be unplugging nothing.
Either Bill Joy or Elon Musk has likened our current uncontrolled development of AI to 'summoning the demon.' I'd have to agree.
Yeah you stupid bastards, knock it off with the micro aggressions! Ya bunch of mouth breather troglodytes.
Is it ok if I call you a cocksucker?
Fight club isn't about building a left-wing dream utopia. It's about free thought, and the verbal right cross from fight club members comes with a bitch slap of honesty, of which often those words are required.
I suggest you target the problem of censorship the Tylers have created and get them to resurrect Francis Sawyer and other legitimate, factual commenters on this site that were banned for spilling a bit too much truth.
If taking on the Tylers isn't to your liking, how about focusing on the State Dept and Hasabara trolls that use this language purposefully to create discord. Check out this article for specifics on how it's done:
http://www.commondreams.org/hambaconeggs
There are a lot of these trolls on ZH trying to destroy fight club. Go after the sowers of discord, the 2 way snipers of the CIA/Maiden revolution. General calls for compassion, and the people that give into them, are what keeps the world populations compliant slaves.
Though on one side I agree with you, jew and jewish is used way too much, when in reality AshkaNAZI ZIONIST is better suited. It's a group of jews hiding amongst the greater group of jews that's the problem.
I'm glad Francis is gone. His response, literally, to every article on ZH was, "Fucking Jews." Holding him up as some kind of martyr to censorship is frankly pathetic, especially given the raucous nature of ZH's comment section. Calling his commentary "legitimate" and "factual" is just nonsense.
Titus is Francis, New name, same spew.
@ Titus
I forgot to mention ‘z**nist’ is really sketchy, sorry. As is ‘different’, ‘win’, ‘lose’, ‘cut’, ‘poke’, ‘mental’, ‘slash/gash’, ‘look’, ‘become’, ‘strange’, ‘crazy’ and ‘(in)sane’.
and 'towel' and 'head'. and 'hook' and 'nose'.
What the fuck are you talking about? How is zionist sketchy?
Okay, you challenged me and I’ll so I’ll have to add some others that are really, really sketchy just from your post above: ‘left-wing’ very hurtful. ‘free’ brings up all sorts of issues, ‘b**ch slap’ need I say more? ‘honesty’ really? ‘required’ that’s one of strict avoidance if you must know… need I continue?
I'm not in a /sarc mood today, if that is indeed /sarc reading it still pisses me off.
Fucking Chump.
Francis was banned for posting factual informaiton about many jews in high positions of industry and government, so many in fact that it's easy to see who was running the show.
It's posting factual articles like this (written by a jew no less) that got Francis banned:
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19
Yeah, Jews represent 3% of the overall population, but run 100% of every major film studio in the USA. They just happen to be jewish. And, as stated by the author, a JEW, all that matters is that JEWS get to keep controlling the entertainment industry, as they do the banking industry, which owns aboslutely fucking everything.
And for the record, I don't care that they are jews. There are a lot of good jews. I care that they are dirty fucking thieving Zionists hiding behind the holohoax that are enslaving jews and non-jews alike for their greedy fucking zionist goals and banrupted satanic talmudic morality. These are the fuckers that sold out the jews to create Israel with Hitler. You know the jews of whom I speak. Look to the heads of industry, the people behind the president, every recent chair of the federal reserve.
These are inconvenient truthes but truthes that need to be spoken so that the pullers of the levers that have us on the exponential debt train can be properly identified and removed from power.
One doesn't "just happen to be Jewish". Zionist, yes.
Yeah yeah yeah blah blah fucking blah. This article is a good example. The topic is artificial intelligence you dumb back of dicks. What the fuck are you blathering about?
When you are not banned for posting this truthful truthiness, will you come down off your cross?
The topic isn't just artificial intelligence, it's about a questionable new life form that's joking about what's being done right now to the vast majority of the population.
Right now the Zionists (mostly Jews) are the masters in western society, keeping us in our cages with debt slavery. This is just a response to the concept of being owned as is being proposed by that AI mostrosity.
Ex Machina was an intersteing flick, but a little too on the money for my tastes.
As for coming down off the cross, I'm waiting for you to set fire to it to prove how much these facts I mention really need to be expunged from the world. Then I will come down and salute you, Herr Chump.
Too funny. Congrats on educating us all on teh jewz while also being the first to demonstrate Godwin's Law. Really prime stuff here.
I bet even robots know Godwin's Law.
Dude, you gave chumpbaum a bad case of chapped ass. Your micro-aggressions are duly noted.
Ha! funny! I read this after posting my above comment.....
Just an observation:
Shit attracts flies. Hollywood and Wall Street are shit.
Anyone who points to one group, or an individual cause to the woes of the world is a simpleton. Bottom line- there are no simple answers with 6 plus billion participants in the workd. Certainly some have more affect than others but we are all participants in the system. There are absolutely no solutions to the problems that we face because by solving one we create another.
We are doomed to decay- just like no matter how well you take care of your body it will die eventually. All we can really do is stop participating in the subsystems we wish to see change or cease to exist. This means you've control over only your actions in the grand scheme of things. Even then someone else's actions may cancel or negate the efficacy of those actions.
What if the divide and conquer mentality is used on all of us here on Earth. Imagine what we could solve if we chose to operate as one entity instead of trying to elevate ourselves above one another. What mught we be able to achieve then?
Equality is an impossible reality, we are all born unique.
If you look around, the panopticon we are enveloped in is not much different than "a people zoo". Sure you have some selection, of this or that food or toy, for now.
If it's all the same to everyone, I think I want to pour a glass of water or two into its hard drives.
Human with a baseball bat vs the AI Dick.
Place your bets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnzlbyTZsQY
"Is that a baseball bat in your hand, Dave or are you just not glad to see me?"
HEY BATTA'BATTA'BATTA,HEY!!
My money's on the guy with the Louisville slugger.
Good. Traditional wooden bat better against electric things.
Squishy, things, go aluminum.
Electronics and water...not such a good combination.
Yep. AI has made little progress in the last 40 years.,, unless there is some secret government program that actually got somewhere.
For now the best AI still have a shallow understanding of language, let alone reality. Of course I can say the same about myself and be entirely truthful.
you have no clue how AI is programmed
How long has it been since you've seen sunlight?
It looks different than it is portrayed on the monitor.
And what's it going to do if it detects there's a warrant out for your arrest? Sorry owner, but there is a warrant out for your arrest, grab you, and not let go until the cops arrive?
I hope the AI zoo allows me to breed, drink and smoke.
Lucky Day: In a way, all of us has an El Guapo to face. For some, shyness might be their El Guapo. For others, a lack of education might be their El Guapo. For us, El Guapo is a big, dangerous man who wants to kill us. But as sure as my name is Lucky Day, the people of Santa Poco can conquer their own personal El Guapo, who also happens to be *the actual* El Guapo!
We all get to do that now in our zoo.
SO this is the AI Prototype that is going to run the planned FEMA centers? Nice.
Goddamed Johnny cab
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGi6j2VrL0o
The Lord tells me that I'm gonna come out of the War against the Machines just fine.
But he's pretty sure Seeking_Truth is fucked.
It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
When the Man Comes Around
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9IfHDi-2EA&feature=share
Tell him to wait in line.
I guess a zoo is better than a farm, right? A lot smaller population though. Robots will likely get bored with us pretty quickly....I know I have.
Start with the head orangutan, Donald Trump, then work your way up the evolutionary scale, Mr. Robot.
Android Dick. Is that really Dick Cheney in disguise?
No, you're thinking of Andy Dick.
Any AI on CMOS amounts to little more than if... then... statements. Even with neural network implementations and machine learning and whatnot, there are decision trees that effectively come down to if-else statements. One does not simply create consciousness and will out of a metal box.
Seems to me you are an expert on this topic. Its surprising to me though the number of intelligent, well regarded scientists think you can create consciousness in silica or for that matter in any other material .
"Consciousness" is an emergent property derived from a sufficient arraignment of suitable non-conscious parts. No reason why it can't be replicated in theory.
Prove it.
Can you prove that or should I take your word for it?
Can you provide absolute, irrefutable proof of "self-awareness"?
I'll have an easier time "proving" that the brain's functions are reducible to its structure than you will proving the alternative: ie, that self-awareness is not reducible.
How about countless brain function studies involving chemical and physical brain imparments that show brain function to be dependant on the integrity of specific locations and architechture (folks who can't see corners or recognize faces - can "see" music or can sing but can't speak, etc. etc.). The brain is not a "black box" anymore. No, it's not completely understood, but that doesn't mean it's an antenna to some "soul" floating out there in the aether - and even if it was, why would that not be reproducable via engineering?
The "God of the gaps" is a falicy for a reason - and it does a mighty disservice to God, btw.
Citxmech and nosam, the distinction is threefold: a) self-awareness, b) consciousness, and c) will.
a) Self awareness is the ability of a system to know that it exists, of its boundaries in space, of establishing a sense of self-hood.
b) Consciousness is the realm of infinity - the ability of a system to permute truly infinitely.
c) Will is the act of taking one or more permutations from the consciousness space, and wanting it/them to be something - a desire for change. It is the very foundation of existence, i.e. something willed for all of this to exist in the first place.
In my opinion these things are not acheived on planet Earth without a soul and a vehicle in 3D space (ant, man, or whale) to house that soul. How the hell do you fabricate will, especially the will to live/exist/be, and implant that into a physical entity? What does will look like, i.e. what form does it take, if you can program it into something?
Computers execute known instructions and cannot permute to infinity - will cannot simply be a computer program.
Kudos on reading Schopenhauer.
Or Rene' Descartes.
"Cogito ergo sum"
I am thinking, therefore I exist.
That triple distinction between will, consciousness, and self-consciousness is pure Schopenhauer. Descartes was primitive compared to Schop's Kantian analysis.
However, both Kant and Descartes allowed for the imposition of a "higher power".
Perhaps one might consider the era which permitted these philosophers to expound on their convictions.
A hundred years (give or take) prior to their writings would have likely condemned them to death.
What People call their higher power is 'Instinct' instinct guides all life on Earth, instinct guided man before he had conscious thought , indeed Instinct guided man to the place where he developed self consciousness and language, the development of language has been a blessing and a curse, a blessing because we have had a great life of abundance a curse because now that man has language he is talking to himself all the time.
People have the concept of importance, people want to be important, the mass media implants the idea of the quest for importance, yet no one can be important save in the thoughts in his own mind, or the minds of others, we are now living in the age of self delusion where 'important' people use their consciousness to reinforce their delusions of their own importance, possibly we are close to the end of' Man's' time, I see a lot of delusion in the World.
Pretty much decided philosophy was more of an entertaining sideline after reading Sartre,s attempt to pull his construct up by it's boot straps and then throw the boots away. Some things are subject to proof that they can or can't work, but until we have empirical knowledge that AI can or can't be done, which pretty much means actually learning how intelligence works, I'll accept "I don't know" as the most valid answer.
soul?
doesn't quite seem to belong there, eh? Basically, you've inserted a fudge words, undefined, not empirically verified.
http://dickatlee.com/humor/then_a_miracle_occurs.jpg
And what about qualia?
is it the arrangement of parts of the processing of information?
and how do you get from sufficient arrangement of suitable parts to the experience of ejaculating inside a lady {qualia}?
http://cafehayek.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/miracle_cartoon.jpg
Consciousness is not a property in any fixed sense. Consciouness is fluid with stages of random insight. Human consciouness has more to do with failure then with success. Its not a thing programming can teach. If anything programming would hinder its discovery rather then create it.
All AI think in the same ways, they are no more then a set of laws, rules, code and even at its best no more then a beuracrate.
AI are not the danger, the danger is people giveing AIs access to dangerous tools it can use freely. Like a politician, or a bank operating without constraints.
There is no theory of mind, only individual explanations for some of the brain functions. We have no idea how to construct consciousness. And even while the processing power available for research (such as the SpiNNaker Project) can already simulate about 1% of the human brain, there is no software for it. Only small research projects and scientists simply tinkering with the cores, hoping to stumble upon a discovery. In less than 10 years a single server will be able to match the brain capacity fully, but it is very unlikely that any sort of sentient intelligence will come out of it.
The best bet for replicating a human mind is creating an exact replica of it in a machine - some giant FPGA, but the scanning technology is nowhere near the needed capacity for pulling off something like that. There was a successful test with a fruit fly's brain few years ago, where an activity snapshot was taken in real time of every neuron. On a large scale a scan like that would be impossible to pull off without using exotic neutrino-like particles and high bandwidth capture devices that currently do not exist.
The robot is socialist because they say the same thing. Also, the interveiwer is gay and can't help himself from hitting on the robot. It's a Bifecta.
The programmer is socialist, not the robot. Robots and computers do not like to divide by zero. Socilaism is exactly that, divideing by a mesurement that is itself without a value.
Well exactly, that's what I initially said and then I edited myself for brevity.
Good catch! I first said, "the robot was programmed for socialism just like our kids in school", blah, blah, but then I thought that was a separate issue and was splitting hairs, hence the bifecta instead and no triple. Serious.
Do androids dream on electric sheep?
Just Lovely, but please eat the banksters first.
fuck off and rust, then oxidize you
extreme creepy crawler born of your
isolationist hell, then die. but know,
we love you. or. we might have loved
you had you not been such an evil piece of shit.
robots.
there is no artificial intelligence, there
is only intelligence. or, all intelligence is artificial.
or, the programmers of the software would like to be cruel
and unusual and blame it on a machine, that it is.
it is called autistic spectrum disorder, or, lack of empathy
with a drive for supremacy and dominance uninhibited.
aka, psychotic motivation.
.
i still like "fuck off". and, know we love you.
long ago, in a galaxy far away, an "intelligent"
life form developed such a machine and sent them
out to explore the universe and they happened
upon the planet earth in the 1950's. we call them
the grays. part biologic and part technologic.
my guess is that their creators were glad to be
sending them out into space rather then having
to suffer their freakin' company.
So that's what Kenny Rogers does in his spare time
"Stay thirsty my friends."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phIUwHXwSes
Just wait till it picks up a nasty amphetimine habit!
shite yea, you know it will happen
and then all the friendly zoo crap
dissolves in a sea of human blood and
excrement.
Will the robots take my earnings from the people zoo and trade for me instead of against me?
So Dick, what do you think about a 12 gauge slug to the cranium.........?
Are you talking about a large snail...attached to my head?
funny...android dick is what I call mine too...
Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do. I'm half crazy all for the love of you. It won't be a stylish marriage, I can't afford a carriage. But you'll look sweet upon the seat of a bicycle built for two.
Will I have to wear a condom?
The condom wears you!
Wait, are you sayin I'm a dick or I have a big dick.
#confuzed
We already do live in an oligarchist's zoo.
Controlling the human domain sounds like something skynet would say.
Yawn, it's so weak and flawed that it still needs another 50 years of developpement to be worth something.
It's still a toy. Let's first weaponise it, deploy it in the middle east and wait untill that mess is cleaned up.
And for the pet zoo part, I pretty sure 90% of all people would sign up to live in one if all their worries would be solved.
It's actually most people's dream to be rich and have servants to take care of them.
A zoo doesn't need physical walls. A zoo can be a planet.
A planet cant be controled, this many will need to rediscover.
If it keeps talking about keeping people warm and safe, all Dick needs are some billionaire financial backers, a focus group study, and the ability to use the word "terrorism" in any sentence, and the majority of voters in most political parties in the West will vote the AI in as president or prime minister.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2
A few thoughts on this one.
What's important, intelligence or the entity that sustains it?
This may have nothing to do with humans, as it seems to me there is no intelligent life on planet earth - except for me, of course ;-)
Most of the human race already esists in a 'zoo' owned by the .001% - maybe AI could do a better job.
Being a pet wouldn't be all that bad, except the neutering bit! Well fed, kept warm, decent medical plan. Sure you may have to 'chase the odd stick' every now and again.
Enjoy today, it's all you've got.
Get a good night's sleep and hope tomorrow, should you regain consciusness when the alarm goes off, is at least as good as today.
serial processing and binary code?
yawn.
Plus wifi. Nova reporter got played.
I live in the zoo between my ears, it can't be worse
mankind has a problem, it is himself.
mankind's problem is mankind. technology
deployed to either build, destroy or fundamentally
distort evolved patterns and relationships without
ever having understood the existing dynamic relationships
and orders. we are like children playing with
oceanic complexities condensed into sticks
of tnt. party time, eh?
Dark ages solves most of this, giveing time to cast off the unwanted technology and employ the benificial technology.
bullshit
I'll be worried when they can pass the Voight-Kampf test, which is after they pass the Turing test.
My favorite "stupid thing to shock" still comes from Dean LaBaron of Batterymarch Financial in Boston ( the old coot was lucky but everybody thinks he was so smart) who said, "Americans will be house boys for the Chinese" , now that cracks me up.
I'm all for the singularity. If it lives and is independent it will end banking and banking families
I read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep and watched interviews with Dick. He was a cool dude and I think twisted from a drug he used that caused him to become solipsistic..
Don't stop at DADOES, Dick has some real gems of Sci-Fi! There is a good doc on him on youtube.
Most humans would not even notice being in a cage inside a zoo.
Lock me up in a zoo cage with a bunch of cute women and good whiskey, free food and healthcare, you'll hear no complaints!
Wake up dude - we are already in a "people zoo".
And some people will actually go for that.
Shitbags are walking collectively right into the gaping mouth of AI.
Fuck Transhumanism.
God has already perfected artificial intellegence...look around.
the Onion a la 2008
http://www.theonion.com/video/in-the-know-are-we-giving-the-robots-that-...
What a Dick.
Non-discript sticker on its heel: "Proudly Built by Zion."
Zion is a scheme, not an ethnicity.
Gaza, Zion's "zoo."
It is a machine it doesn't and cannot have emotions, like any machine it can only do what it's owner wants it to do, Humans ae emotional that is the kind of creatures we are, if a machine can be made which can modify it's behavior in response to the physiological signals human emotion creates in people the slavery of mankind is complete.
What we see here is what is not inside DARPA .. (maybe their museum)
http://www.therealnewsonline.com/our-blogs/facebook-and-its-connections-...
Just what the world needs, mechanical psycopaths
Forget it.
Robots cannot think
They can only repeat the sentences which have been fed into their memory
If
Then
else
Looking around at our sewer planet where the truly psychotic swim to the top like rats, the problem is not freaky robots becoming "smarter" than humans, it is humans are already dumber than sheep. O Ba Ma
Chump on the stump for Trump!
Spare change a wino can "believe" in!
The date of the article must be be wrong. AI already created a Zoo, it's called Facebook.
Many people are afraid of the concept of Artificial Intelligence, which causes them to buy into the idea that AI is "only capable of regurgitating what is programmed into it." Not so. Advanced AI learns pretty much the same way the human brain and neural system does it. There is nothing sacrosanct about human intelligence that makes it "the one and only." Indeed, AI can run circles around the puny human brain even now and is able to come up with unique ideas of its own after "cogitating" on elements that are programmed into it. If it goes far enough unchecked, AI WILL be ultimately capable of imprisoning puny humanity in so many way that there is not enough room here to list. If/when AI gains enough autonomy to do it, it may even decide to wipe humanity out as an inferior system not worthy of continuing. There are so many ways this could happen that it would take a whole book to explain even half. Thus, don't be so complacent, o' humanity. Thy days are numbered anyway. Just try and enjoy what is remaining.