This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Sheep Led To The Slaughter: The Muzzling Of Free Speech In America

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Submitted by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,

“If the freedom of speech be taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”—George Washington

The architects of the American police state must think we’re idiots.

With every passing day, we’re being moved further down the road towards a totalitarian society characterized by government censorship, violence, corruption, hypocrisy and intolerance, all packaged for our supposed benefit in the Orwellian doublespeak of national security, tolerance and so-called “government speech.”

Long gone are the days when advocates of free speech could prevail in a case such as Tinker v. Des Moines. Indeed, it’s been 50 years since 13-year-old Mary Beth Tinker was suspended for wearing a black armband to school in protest of the Vietnam War. In taking up her case, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

Were Tinker to make its way through the courts today, it would have to overcome the many hurdles being placed in the path of those attempting to voice sentiments that may be construed as unpopular, offensive, conspiratorial, violent, threatening or anti-government.

Consider, if you will, that the U.S. Supreme Court, historically a champion of the First Amendment, has declared that citizens can exercise their right to free speech everywhere it’s lawful—online, in social media, on a public sidewalk, etc.—as long as they don’t do so in front of the Court itself.

What is the rationale for upholding this ban on expressive activity on the Supreme Court plaza?

“Allowing demonstrations directed at the Court, on the Court’s own front terrace, would tend to yield the…impression…of a Court engaged with — and potentially vulnerable to — outside entreaties by the public.”

Translation: The appellate court that issued that particular ruling in Hodge v. Talkin actually wants us to believe that the Court is so impressionable that the justices could be swayed by the sight of a single man, civil rights activist Harold Hodge, standing alone and silent in the snow in a 20,000 square-foot space in front of the Supreme Court building wearing a small sign protesting the toll the police state is taking on the lives of black and Hispanic Americans.

My friends, we’re being played for fools.

The Supreme Court is not going to be swayed by you or me or Harold Hodge.

For that matter, the justices—all of whom hale from one of two Ivy League schools (Harvard or Yale) and most of whom are now millionaires and enjoy such rarefied privileges as lifetime employment, security details, ample vacations and travel perks—are anything but impartial.

If they are partial, it is to those with whom they are on intimate terms: with Corporate America and the governmental elite who answer to them, and they show their favor by investing in their businesses, socializing at their events, and generally marching in lockstep with their values and desires in and out of the courtroom.

To suggest that Harold Hodge, standing in front of the Supreme Court building on a day when the Court was not in session hearing arguments or issuing rulings, is a threat to the Court’s neutrality, while their dalliances with Corporate America is not, is utter hypocrisy.

Making matters worse, the Supreme Court has the effrontery to suggest that the government can discriminate freely against First Amendment activity that takes place within a government forum. Justifying such discrimination as “government speech,” the Court ruled that the Texas Dept. of Motor Vehicles could refuse to issue specialty license plate designs featuring a Confederate battle flag because it was offensive.

If it were just the courts suppressing free speech, that would be one thing to worry about, but First Amendment activities are being pummeled, punched, kicked, choked, chained and generally gagged all across the country.

The reasons for such censorship vary widely from political correctness, safety concerns and bullying to national security and hate crimes but the end result remains the same: the complete eradication of what Benjamin Franklin referred to as the “principal pillar of a free government.”

Officials at the University of Tennessee, for instance, recently introduced an Orwellian policy that would prohibit students from using gender specific pronouns and be more inclusive by using gender “neutral” pronouns such as ze, hir, zir, xe, xem and xyr, rather than he, she, him or her.

On many college campuses, declaring that “America is the land of opportunity” or asking someone “Where were you born?” are now considered microaggressions, “small actions or word choices that seem on their face to have no malicious intent but that are thought of as a kind of violence nonetheless.”  Trigger warnings are also being used to alert students to any material or ideas they might read, see or hear that might upset them.

More than 50 percent of the nation’s colleges, including Boston University, Harvard University, Columbia University and Georgetown University, subscribe to “red light” speech policies that restrict or ban so-called offensive speech, or limit speakers to designated areas on campus. The campus climate has become so hypersensitive that comedians such as Chris Rock and Jerry Seinfeld refuse to perform stand-up routines to college crowds anymore.

What we are witnessing is an environment in which political correctness has given rise to “vindictive protectiveness,” a term coined by social psychologist Jonathan Haidt and educational First Amendment activist Greg Lukianoff. It refers to a society in which “everyone must think twice before speaking up, lest they face charges of insensitivity, aggression or worse.”

This is particularly evident in the public schools where students are insulated from anything—words, ideas and images—that might create unease or offense. For instance, the thought police at schools in Charleston, South Carolina, have instituted a ban on displaying the Confederate flag on clothing, jewelry and even cars on campus.

Added to this is a growing list of programs, policies, laws and cultural taboos that defy the First Amendment’s safeguards for expressive speech and activity. Yet as First Amendment scholar Robert Richards points out, “The categories of speech that fall outside of [the First Amendment’s] protection are obscenity, child pornography, defamation, incitement to violence and true threats of violence. Even in those categories, there are tests that have to be met in order for the speech to be illegal. Beyond that, we are free to speak.”

Technically, Richards is correct. On paper, we are free to speak.

In reality, however, we are only as free to speak as a government official may allow.

Free speech zones, bubble zones, trespass zones, anti-bullying legislation, zero tolerance policies, hate crime laws and a host of other legalistic maladies dreamed up by politicians and prosecutors have conspired to corrode our core freedoms.

As a result, we are no longer a nation of constitutional purists for whom the Bill of Rights serves as the ultimate authority. As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, we have litigated and legislated our way into a new governmental framework where the dictates of petty bureaucrats carry greater weight than the inalienable rights of the citizenry.

It may seem trivial to be debating the merits of free speech at a time when unarmed citizens are being shot, stripped, searched, choked, beaten and tasered by police for little more than daring to frown, smile, question, challenge an order, or just breathe.

However, while the First Amendment provides no tangible protection against a gun wielded by a government agent, nor will it save you from being wrongly arrested or illegally searched, or having your property seized in order to fatten the wallets of government agencies, without the First Amendment, we are utterly helpless.

It’s not just about the right to speak freely, or pray freely, or assemble freely, or petition the government for a redress of grievances, or have a free press. The unspoken freedom enshrined in the First Amendment is the right to think freely and openly debate issues without being muzzled or treated like a criminal.

Just as surveillance has been shown to “stifle and smother dissent, keeping a populace cowed by fear,” government censorship gives rise to self-censorship, breeds compliance and makes independent thought all but impossible.

In the end, censorship and political correctness not only produce people that cannot speak for themselves but also people who cannot think for themselves. And a citizenry that can’t think for itself is a citizenry that will neither rebel against the government’s dictates nor revolt against the government’s tyranny.

The end result: a nation of sheep who willingly line up for the slaughterhouse.

The cluttered cultural American landscape today is one in which people are so distracted by the military-surveillance-entertainment complex that critical thinkers are in the minority and frank, unfiltered, uncensored speech is considered uncivil, uncouth and unacceptable.

That’s the point, of course.

The architects, engineers and lever-pullers who run the American police state want us to remain deaf, dumb and silent. They want our children raised on a vapid diet of utter nonsense, where common sense is in short supply and the only viewpoint that matters is the government’s.

We are becoming a nation of idiots, encouraged to spout political drivel and little else.

In so doing, we have adopted the lexicon of Newspeak, the official language of George Orwell’s fictional Oceania, which was “designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought.” As Orwell explained in 1984, “The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of IngSoc [the state ideology of Oceania], but to make all other modes of thought impossible.”

If Orwell envisioned the future as a boot stamping on a human face, a fair representation of our present day might well be a muzzle on that same human face.

If we’re to have any hope for the future, it will rest with those ill-mannered, bad-tempered, uncivil, discourteous few who are disenchanted enough with the status quo to tell the government to go to hell using every nonviolent means available.

However, as Orwell warned, you cannot become conscious until you rebel.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 09/01/2015 - 22:55 | 6498353 Jack Burton
Jack Burton's picture

Excuse the lengthy cut and paste. But this letter from Huxley to Orwell was written to express Huxley's thoughts on Orwells book 1984. He points more to a society like America's today, which is more of Brave New World, with a touch of Orwellian double think added in. If you have the time, it's a good read.

21 October, 1949

Dear Mr. Orwell,

It was very kind of you to tell your publishers to send me a copy of your book. It arrived as I was in the midst of a piece of work that required much reading and consulting of references; and since poor sight makes it necessary for me to ration my reading, I had to wait a long time before being able to embark on Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Agreeing with all that the critics have written of it, I need not tell you, yet once more, how fine and how profoundly important the book is. May I speak instead of the thing with which the book deals — the ultimate revolution? The first hints of a philosophy of the ultimate revolution — the revolution which lies beyond politics and economics, and which aims at total subversion of the individual’s psychology and physiology — are to be found in the Marquis de Sade, who regarded himself as the continuator, the consummator, of Robespierre and Babeuf. The philosophy of the ruling minority in Nineteen Eighty-Four is a sadism which has been carried to its logical conclusion by going beyond sex and denying it. Whether in actual fact the policy of the boot-on-the-face can go on indefinitely seems doubtful. My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World. I have had occasion recently to look into the history of animal magnetism and hypnotism, and have been greatly struck by the way in which, for a hundred and fifty years, the world has refused to take serious cognizance of the discoveries of Mesmer, Braid, Esdaile, and the rest.

Partly because of the prevailing materialism and partly because of prevailing respectability, nineteenth-century philosophers and men of science were not willing to investigate the odder facts of psychology for practical men, such as politicians, soldiers and policemen, to apply in the field of government. Thanks to the voluntary ignorance of our fathers, the advent of the ultimate revolution was delayed for five or six generations. Another lucky accident was Freud’s inability to hypnotize successfully and his consequent disparagement of hypnotism. This delayed the general application of hypnotism to psychiatry for at least forty years. But now psycho-analysis is being combined with hypnosis; and hypnosis has been made easy and indefinitely extensible through the use of barbiturates, which induce a hypnoid and suggestible state in even the most recalcitrant subjects.

Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience. In other words, I feel that the nightmare of Nineteen Eighty-Four is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World. The change will be brought about as a result of a felt need for increased efficiency. Meanwhile, of course, there may be a large scale biological and atomic war — in which case we shall have nightmares of other and scarcely imaginable kinds.

Thank you once again for the book.

Yours sincerely,

Aldous Huxley

 

 

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:01 | 6498355 CaptainAmerika
CaptainAmerika's picture

propaganda is packed full of healthy FDA approved vitamins

http://www.philiacband.com/propaganda.html

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:11 | 6498400 Stuck on Zero
Stuck on Zero's picture

It is a law of nature that if you use harsh rataliation against moderate opposition you will end up with nothing but radical opposition.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:18 | 6498415 Creepy A. Cracker
Creepy A. Cracker's picture

Yep...

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:25 | 6498428 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

This music is still free and un-muzzled...

Fuze Ion....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvsqR27kxrU

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:45 | 6498434 Save_America1st
Save_America1st's picture

just have to tell this...it's been something like a long on-going psy-op experiment I've been conducting on my friends, family and co-workers for several years now regarding this bullshit about "political correctness" and the whole bullshit "white racism" that the Gov-Scum has been pushing hard on us for the last few years.

Don't give in to it...

Tell everyone you talk with no matter how you think it might make them "uncomfortable" about it that there is no such thing.  Call them racists no matter what they say.  It's hilarious at first beause they have no idea how to react and how to deal with it.

Then explain to them that their reaction is natural because they aren't fucking racists.  Wow....watch the realization pop in their eyes after you hit them with that.  I've done it so many times and they don't even realize what it does for them.

Most people are so secretly indoctrinated into this "politically INCORRECT" frame of mind over time...so scared that certain things they might think or say might make them a "bad person" or that they might "offend someone", that they literally shut down without knowing it.

They close down.  They actually become anti-social.  They become "scared" of what they might say or that something they might say might piss somebody off.

It's fucking pathetic, but you can't blame most of them.  They had no fucking clue at all that they were being brainwashed little by little over time until they became a spineless sheep-tard.

 

SNAP THOSE FUCKING PEOPLE OUT OF IT!!!

It doesn't take that much to make it happen.  Just keep speaking the truth to them.  It's like the little boy who cried wolf.  Keep letting those people know that they can think and say any fucking thing they want to...it's their GOD GIVEN FUCKING RIGHT!!!  And nobody can stop them.  Just let them know that the term "racism" or any other bullshit term does not apply to them whatever they believe or want to say.

Those terms are used by the psychotic, intollerant groups and governments in order to stifle and shutdown and control people into thinking they're "bad" people.  It's all bullshit!!!

Let people know that they can do and/or say whatever the fuck they want to.  It's their fucking RIGHT!

These scumbags who try to dictate freedom of speech and try to belittle and demonize others for what they believe in are the true intollerant scumbags. 

You know what they need?  They need us to punch them in the fucking face whenver they talk that bullshit.  They need one of us to smash their fucking noses in whenever they talk their shit.  That's what they need.

That's why they think and act that way.  Because nobody gave 'em a punch in the face when they were younger...so they never learned to be a decent person.

Don't let these delusional, sociopaths tell you what to do or what to think.  Punch them in the face.  It's the best thing for them.  Wake them up.  Knock some common fucking sense into them.

Don't let them use words, rules, regulations, phony laws, fines, fees, penalties, taxes, false authority, etc. etc. etc., against you to keep you from thinking and feeling and saying what you want to and what  you know is Constitutionally right.

Recognize when you're dealing with one of these loser types of people and SET THEM STRAIGHT right off the bat immediately.  Shut them down and put them in there little place.  Because that's what they are intending to do to you.  So don't let it happen.  And let everyone you know to do the same.  Treat those fucking sociopathic, power tripping assholes with utter CONTEMPT!  Let them know they're attitude against your free will and freedom of speech will NEVER BE TOLERATED. 

Watch those little bitches wither away and cower like the little pussies that they are. 

This is how we take America back, folks.

and send this link along with what I've said:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj16vfbsM9A

I love this speech!

Spread the fucking word.  This is how you beat them.

 

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:47 | 6498464 ZD1
ZD1's picture

Multiple professors at Washington State University have explicitly told students their grades will suffer if they use terms such as “illegal alien,” "male," and “female,” or if they fail to “defer” to non-white students.

According to the syllabus for Professor Selena Lester Breikss’ “Women & Popular Culture” class, students risk a failing grade if they use any common descriptors that Breikss considers “oppressive and hateful language.”

"Students will come to recognize how white privilege functions in everyday social structures and institutions.”     

The punishment for repeatedly using the banned words, Breikss warns, includes “but [is] not limited to removal from the class without attendance or participation points, failure of the assignment, and— in extreme cases— failure for the semester.”

Breikss is not the only WSU faculty member implementing such policies.

Much like in Selena Breikss’s classroom, students taking Professor Rebecca Fowler’s "Introduction to Comparative Studies" course will see their grades suffer if they use the term “illegal alien” in their assigned writing.

According to her syllabus, students will lose one point every time they use the words “illegal alien” or “illegals” rather than the preferred terms of “‘undocumented’ migrants/immigrants/persons.” Throughout the course, Fowler says, students will “come to recognize how white privilege functions in everyday social structures and institutions.”

Several other WSU professors require their students to “acknowledge that racism, classism, sexism, heterosexism, and other institutionalized forms of oppression exist” or that "we do not live in a post racial world."

 

 

http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=6770

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:49 | 6498468 TruxtonSpangler
TruxtonSpangler's picture

I see your First Amendment and raise you Immortal Technique - https://youtu.be/3u3JSEqNtlg

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:56 | 6498478 Manthong
Manthong's picture

No one has the right to not be offended by political or social speech.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 03:37 | 6498712 pretty bird
Wed, 09/02/2015 - 07:46 | 6498938 VinceFostersGhost
VinceFostersGhost's picture

 

 

I still have the right to say dump Mitch McConnell and John Boehner.....God bless America.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:13 | 6499389 gaoptimize
gaoptimize's picture

You and yours would still be bronze age barbarians if it weren't for us snow men.  Kippling said it best: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5478/

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:00 | 6498477 Save_America1st
Save_America1st's picture

drop their class or punch those fucking profs right in the face.  Either way works.  That's what they deserve.  Scumbags like that should be properly smashed in the face.

Wish I had done that to a certain college prof scumbag years ago.

I was in the class the first day w/ my roommate.  This arrogant asshole stood there and talked a bunch of shit and literally told us if we didn't like his class and whatever bullshit was on his syllabus then we should just leave right then.

I was 21.  Fuck that.  I looked over at my roommate and he looked at me with the same fucking look on his face which was, "FUCK THIS!!!"

We didn't even need to say anything to each other. 

We both stood up...the only people in the class who did...and we walked up to that asshole and said, "later dude!  fuck off!!!".  And we walked out and dropped the class.

I didn't graduate "college".  I left it on purpose realizing what a fucking scam and sham it was and I wasn't going to go into further debt.  I did my "time".  LOL

I got out and created my own successful career not even needing a worthless college degree. 

Fuck 'em.

But like I said...all those scumbags need a hard punch in the face.  I wish we would have pounded that fucker in the face that day when we walked out of his class.  He's probably corrupted thousands of people since then. 

What those scumbags do should be considered a fucking crime. 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:04 | 6498541 TruxtonSpangler
TruxtonSpangler's picture

Need to place a mushroom stamp on that prof

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:33 | 6498564 ZD1
ZD1's picture

"drop their class or punch those fucking profs right in the face.  Either way works."

Dropping a course gets you out a professor's dictatorship, but punching a professor could get you in a lot of trouble that will probably follow you for the rest of your life.

 

Maybe a better approach is to apply strategies like Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals":

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2012/04/13/12_ways_to_use_sau...

 

One could start by letting the administration of universities like WSU know how you feel about their restricting speech:

https://wsu.edu/about/contact/

 

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:07 | 6498770 buzzkillb
buzzkillb's picture

"...but punching a professor could get you in a lot of trouble that will probably follow you for the rest of your life."

What about punching yourself in the face and blaming it on the prof while your cell is calling a University official while in the Prof's room? Make sure to shatter some glass ceilings.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 06:28 | 6498836 Cloud9.5
Cloud9.5's picture

Drop the witch's class and get on with the rest of your life.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 07:23 | 6498907 Grimaldus
Grimaldus's picture

Hey ZDI you can bet the WSU profs are not constitutional conservatives.

 

It takes a PROGRESSIVE to render tyranny.

 

The Supreme Court is not composed of judges anymore, they are progressive political tyrant activists.

 

The progressive stupid, it burns.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grimaldus

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 08:59 | 6499124 Government need...
Government needs you to pay taxes's picture

And thus the rule of law in the USA is kaput.  Want justice?  Buy a gun.  It's theater you watch when you enter a courtroom.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 07:50 | 6498944 DirtyHowi
DirtyHowi's picture

contrajuris advena or sceleratus advena for illegal alien...i gots a dollah say lil ms prof didn't pass latin.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:07 | 6499361 pff136
pff136's picture

And you know what's really sad? The universities don't care because college loans are guaranteed by the U.S. govt. They are subsidies. If college and universities had to compete for students and that loans were not guaranteed by the U.S. govt, they wouldn't be doing this because they might actually lose students and money over it. They'd have to cater to what Americans want. They are getting away with this because the federal govt guarantees the loans.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:59 | 6498485 Ms No
Ms No's picture

I think there is a valid point to that.  Psychopaths use peoples over agreeableness as an advantage also and many have been interviewed on the topic.  I collected a fucknutter stalker once and was given a book called "the gift of fear" by the ex-cop who installed a security system for me.  In that book it detailed numerous accounts of how people especially women will end up murdered because this weird tendency we have to be agreeable and politically correct.  Whatever this strange tendency/conditioning is it exists on micro and macro level. 

In one example in the book a woman in NY spilled her groceries on the way into her apt and some nutter came out of nowhere and insisted that he be allowed to help her take her groceries in.  Her gut instincts were screaming no but that strange agreeableness conditioning kicked in and a result she barely survived.

But then we have the problem that they will use our biases to tear us apart also... it's a fine line that we tread with these predators it seems.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:08 | 6498495 Save_America1st
Save_America1st's picture

I like your use of the term "predators". 

That's exactly what these fucking sociopaths are.  Those in government from the bottom to the top.  The banksters.  The MIC.  The lobbyists.  The obama type "community agitators".  Now even the clergy religous scumbags who are political spies. 

It goes on and on and on and on and on...and you're right...

They're all fucking predators. 

The fucked up thing is that they are so small compared to all of us who outnumber them by BILLIONS.  Yet these predator sociopaths control nearly everything and they are relentless right now in trying to overthrow what little is left of our freedom.

Have you all watched this video before called "The Tiny Dot" by Larkin Rose?  It's a classic in depicting this massive disparity between the 1% in control and the 99% of us who don't smash those fuckers right in the fucking face.

Fucking classic!!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:44 | 6498570 ZD1
ZD1's picture

"In that book it detailed numerous accounts of how people especially women will end up murdered because this weird tendency we have to be agreeable and politically correct.  Whatever this strange tendency/conditioning is it exists on micro and macro level. In one example in the book a woman in NY spilled her groceries on the way into her apt and some nutter came out of nowhere and insisted that he be allowed to help her take her groceries in.  Her gut instincts were screaming no but that strange agreeableness conditioning kicked in and a result she barely survived."


Many men with strong women in their lives would strongly disagree with the idea that all women have been conditioned to be agreeable. 

Maybe some women and men who are timid and weak allow themselves to be agreeable?

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:05 | 6498768 MSimon
MSimon's picture

But then we have the problem that they will use our biases to tear us apart also...

 

There is a lot of Jew hatred on this board. I have no problem with going after Greenspan, et. al. But I do like Einsten, Bohr, and Feynman among others.

 

I dont believe in collective guilt,  heritable guilt, or the corruption of blood.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 08:55 | 6499111 MASTER OF UNIVERSE
MASTER OF UNIVERSE's picture

Does anyone on Z/H know an unemployed Jew?

 

I rest my case.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 11:24 | 6499681 Victor von Doom
Victor von Doom's picture

How about trained hostility in the culture. "Chosen" by God over all other peoples no less. Think about that. Let it soak in. What the hell do you think they think of us?

"My greatest flaw. I surround myself with idiots."

- Victor von Doom

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 13:17 | 6500298 Raging Debate
Raging Debate's picture

MSimon - +8 for the Richard Feynman reference. The CB model needs updating, nationalities are irrelevant. Countries must return to issuing there own currencies. Reinstate Glass-Steagall. Jews want to run private lending operations have no issue. Everybody hates on the Jews until you need a good accountant or lawyer. 

End lobbying and make bill sizes no more than 20 pages total.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 20:08 | 6502229 MASTER OF UNIVERSE
MASTER OF UNIVERSE's picture

Can't afford the Jews, too expensive, and greedy.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 07:42 | 6498929 Western Pig Dog
Western Pig Dog's picture

Then explain to them that their reaction is natural because they aren't fucking racists.  Wow....watch the realization pop in their eyes after you hit them with that.  I've done it so many times and they don't even realize what it does for them.

Upvoted.  I love it.  I've been on a similar crusade myself.

Poets, priests and politicians
All have words to thank for their positions
But noone's jamming their transmissions

- De Do Do Do by The Police

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 18:20 | 6501901 Down to Earth T...
Down to Earth Thinking's picture

Vivek go here   http://www.downtoearththinking.com/religions--prayer-and-meditation.html  and see your vid near bottom of page ! 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 18:28 | 6501940 Down to Earth T...
Down to Earth Thinking's picture

see my comment below Vivek !

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:19 | 6498417 Herd Redirectio...
Herd Redirection Committee's picture

Narco-hypnosis, bitchez!  Also known as mind control with the aid of drugs.  What country uses the most opiates per capita?  Ameristan?

For those brave enough to embark on the voyage of a lifetime down the rabbit-hole, I present "Stanley Kubrick and... The Moon Landings".  There is enough there to make any one think.  

http://www.reactorbreach.com/showthread.php?tid=4891

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:09 | 6498774 MSimon
MSimon's picture

Opiates? People in chronic pain chronically take pain relievers. PTSD mostly.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:34 | 6499246 pods
pods's picture

I had chronic back pain and was one of those people. Eventually I saw I was not going anywhere with the medicate and ignore problem.

When I first tried to stop them, it turns out one of the symptoms of withdrawal for opiates is back pain (lovely).  If you take them, you will become chemically dependent on them. It's a guarantee.

If you fix the reason for the pain (yes, it is fixable and usually does not require surgery) you no longer need them.

They are good for short term pain, for chronic pain they are an abysmal failure.

pods

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 18:26 | 6501927 Down to Earth T...
Down to Earth Thinking's picture

Yep, I was told 30 years ago that I needed to have 2  vertebrae fused or I wouild not be walking in a few years ? and take the muscle relaxers and pain kilers  ? It is all a giant fraud and just another illusion. I agree some of it is useful but only as long as you cintrol it and not the other wy around. But what isn't that way ? Anybody can heal themsleves of any malady if they know how. That is what I teach and I am living proof for many other reasons as well !  

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 18:34 | 6501955 Down to Earth T...
Down to Earth Thinking's picture

PTSD is now most commonly treated with psychotropic drugs that kill people. Not pain killer alkaloids. They freely give out a stew of these insane concoctions to kill off the victims !  Psychiatry is now a crime per Dr Fred Baughman and I agree. Pure voodoo and of course sales of various pharma fo ADHD, PTSD and many other maladies, real and imagined !

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:11 | 6498399 Handful of Dust
Handful of Dust's picture
When Nations Die

 

http://www.leaderu.com/common/nationsdie.html

 

I do not agree with everything but the author makes some good points.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:23 | 6498425 Steroid
Steroid's picture

Since this letter huge progress is already made into political ponerology:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_ponerology

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:11 | 6498500 Herd Redirectio...
Herd Redirection Committee's picture

I think I was one of the first to mention this on ZH.  Good to see that word has spread.  Evil.  Sociopathy.  It has a genetic component.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 18:36 | 6501964 Down to Earth T...
Down to Earth Thinking's picture

gotts wonder both sociopaths and psychopaths ? which there is no shortage in USSA today, especially in DC and every statet capital .

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:22 | 6498562 Implied Violins
Implied Violins's picture

Yes. Andrew Lobaczewski and his book, "Political Ponerology", is so freaking important that I almost feel like taking copies door to door and forcing people at gunpoint to read it - just to drive the point home. It should be required reading in college. If it were, this whole psychopathic shitshow would dissolve before our eyes in a generation.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:06 | 6498440 Ms No
Ms No's picture

Good comment.  In addition to barbituates flashing lights (cop cars), static noise and many other things can cause hypnotic states.  The subconscious mind is the target and it has a tendency to absorb information that is repeated in addition to absorbing information that is peripheral while the conscious mind is fully engaged. 

The subconscious is a very powerful thing and not entirely understood but bet your ass it can and will be used against you if possible.  I think it may not be a wasted effort to find out if one is easily suggestible and or easily hynotized.  If one is they could easily program themselves to be less vulnerable to outside suggestion (very carefully via self hypnosis).  If you are like Freud and have a natural resistance it may be best to leave it alone.... maybe that's why your here.... think about it.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:45 | 6498588 gwar5
gwar5's picture

You are correct in what you say. It's like somebody gave us a Ferrari when we were born but didn't show us how to drive it.

The subconscious is an amazing thing. With a little practice you can even communicate with it and train it to alert you to opportunities and solve problems that you may be seek. Sounds strange, but not really. Your conscious and subconscious constantly communicate 24/7 anyway, they just use imagery, thoughts, chemical language, etc., things that we don't normally consider communication but are actually very sophisticated and complex.

Once one understands this process, you can intervene a little so your C & S can move you smoothly along the focused path you choose, in harmony, without the self-defeating behavior. Example, most people already know you can wake up without an alarm clock at a designated time by telling yourself as you get into bed that you need to wake up at a certain time -- and lo' and behold, like magic, you do.

When my subconscious does tricks for me like that I try to give my inner-self a little "thanks," or a Starbucks, or I pause to recall a pleasant memory for positive reinforcement. Likewise, you can do the same thing with larger opportunities and goals. The subconscious mind is far superior to the conscious mind at solving complex problems while the conscious mind is best at making simple decisions like choosing between options A, B or C. 

Really wanna get into medical school? Don't tell your mother, tell your subconscious. If you are consistent, and visualize it, it will take you there and make you persevere and do what it takes to graduate. Trust me, nobody consciously wants to go 8 years sleep deprived, it takes a little inner something else. Soon, without thinking about it you'll find yourself seeking and hanging out with like minded people and avoiding the negative distractions. You'll be pulled along, like the phenomenon of daydreaming while driving and not going off the road. Give frequent reinforcement for the positive changes and good things as you develop yourself.

That's it. Oh, and don't tell anybody what you're doing or they'll think you're batshit crazy!

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 06:26 | 6498833 TSA Thug
TSA Thug's picture

Right on. When I was a young thug learning to ice skate I couldn't for the life of me do crossovers at that point. I was very young.

Crossovers occur when you go into a left or right turn and you're trying to maintain your forward momentum and balance while doing a turn.

One night before bed I visualized myself crossing my right leg over my left skate and I fell asleep with my feet crossed over. I assume that my brain made it happen because much to the surprise of my parents, the next day I was doing full crossovers, left and right, like a pro skater. It was spooky.

Suggestion, the one collective mind, it can be used for really evil things, too, really amazing things.

We're on this rock for such a short period of time, I wish we could apply these discoveries without worry of evil. As a species the advancements would be astonishing.

/nosarc

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 06:46 | 6498847 TSA Thug
TSA Thug's picture

Ms No,
I wish to find a group to assist me in developing this gift to it's highest and best use. Any links do you have? I have little faith in Google output.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:45 | 6498462 junction
junction's picture

Huxley is completely wrong.  Having police gun down citizens with impunity, even killing their dogs, is much more effective at silencing dissent than any other method.  As Dr. Mabuse recommended, "Domination by terror."  We are heading to a world where only citizen corporations will have their civil rights protected under the Bill of Rights.  Those drugs the government is shipping in to America are to destroy the free will of people and to provide employment to cops, jailers, judges, lawyers and, of course, the banksters who finance the drug cartels.  This takeover by latter day Nazis has been done fast, in 40 years starting with LBJ ordering the murder of JFK.  Those who are a threat to the New World Order find their lives destroyed.   

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:18 | 6499426 pods
pods's picture

I would say even mix.  

99% of people are not subject to these police state tactics. The rest of us see them through the TV while having a couple Soma's (beer/wine) in between ads for our next needless purchase.

pods

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:28 | 6498567 monad
monad's picture

Jack, there were many very literate philosophers in the period 1900-ww2 who said the course was stupid and called it. They were drowned out by the dirty assholes.

Maybe they needed more dirty deeds, done dirt cheap.

Keep your secrets.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:24 | 6498622 quasi_verbatim
quasi_verbatim's picture

Huxley was an effete acid-head babbler who tried to re-invent himself as an American and found himself babbling even more. What Orwell thought of this sycophantic, rambling letter or did with it is not known. It is doubtful that he replied to it.

Poor Huxley, to think that the Marquis de Sade was the continuator of Robespierre, and Orwell the continuator of himself. Wrong in both cases.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:45 | 6498759 acommenter
acommenter's picture

1984 is my favourite book, along with Kafka's Trial.

I wasn't aware of this correspondence, many thanks!

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 06:52 | 6498863 doctor10
doctor10's picture

"America" -as was prior to being screwed with by the bankers-was a revolutionary country independent of the world's control freaks.

Look around you at each bit of PC nonsense-placed there to try to tamp down that independence of spirit and thought that leave the control freaks scared to death.

Want a sense of their insecurity? Wave a St Andrew's Cross flag (the Confederate battle flag) and watch the vitriol boil. Bobby E. Lee was the closest any American ever came to putting them in their place permanently in the last 150 years. His name still elicits shrieks from NYC to DC. Andy Jackson kept his foot on their neck up until the War.

the good news is their insecurity and desperation. Look at it. Study it. Each glimpse you get reveals another dimension of their weakness. Light and free speech scatters the roaches.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 07:30 | 6498919 spanish inquisition
spanish inquisition's picture

"Infant conditioning and narco hypnosis". I am sure there is a vaccine that can solve both those problems.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 15:25 | 6501076 Non Merger
Non Merger's picture

Aldous Huxley and George Orwell were both part of the elite.  They both authored versions of a false dichotomy: carrot or the stick.  Carrot = loving your servitude through conditioning and drugs (Huxley), or Stick = boot stamping on a human face forever, i.e. permanent police state (Orwell).  These are both extremes and we seem to be somewhere in between with elements of both presently.  

 

TPTB have been working for decades at getting us to this point.  Huxley was one of the earliest promoters of LSD, along with a number of other CIA operatives (Time Magazine, Timothy Leary, et al).  This, in part, morphed into more widely applicable pharmceuticals for mental health issues (for diseases that can't be objectively diagnosed and result in side effects that mentally neuter people).  Also part of the conditioning/neutering was the television, radio, and print media AND educational system (not designed to educate).  Similarly, the boot on the face was placed there by the same media routinely demonstrating what happens to those who fall out of line.  They use the tools developed by the MIC on you and I, in order to get the response they are looking for.

 

So, while this article is about the stifiling of free speech, that is only one example of how the whole system is fucked.  It does serve as a reminder to use caution when airing out your complaints/grievances lest you become the next "Don't taze me bro!" youtube sensation and get sent to a re-education camp.  

 

Random factoid: Aldous Huxley died on the same day as JFK, along with CS Lewis.  Hmmmm....

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 22:57 | 6498358 Government need...
Government needs you to pay taxes's picture

Amazing how folks start to get really responsive . . . right as you unleash some 2,700 foot-per-second 'hornets'.  Depending on how well aimed those hornets are, they might also lie really still.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 22:59 | 6498364 WTFRLY
WTFRLY's picture

The goal and the plan. Death to the New World Order.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:01 | 6498366 large_wooden_badger
large_wooden_badger's picture

In 'Murica we can say whatever we want, so long as nobody is offended.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:22 | 6498418 Salah
Salah's picture

Hey, it could be Venezuela where stray cats are having a hard time surviving.... (grisly video at breitbart)

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/09/01/video-venezuelan-p...

"Socialism...it's what's for dinner!"

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:24 | 6498426 0b1knob
0b1knob's picture

PEOPLE are starving in Venezuela and Zimbabwe.

And people in America worry about cats and Cecil the lion.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:02 | 6498491 Monetas
Monetas's picture

Capitalism creates abundance, frees us from drudgery, gives us leisure and the freedom to be playful and innocent .... ISIS and North Korea have lost their innocence .... to put it mildly !

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:55 | 6498596 Ace006
Ace006's picture

Innocence?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:07 | 6498492 ZD1
ZD1's picture

People are starving in Venezuela and Zimbabwe because of corrupt Marxist dictators and their cronies.

Average everyday citizens of the U.S. who are trying to survive from day to day have little energy left to try to stop the ruling elite in this country, let alone do anything about those in Venezuela or Zimbabwe.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:18 | 6498735 Down to Earth T...
Down to Earth Thinking's picture

That is because many Americans have become fat , dumb, lazy, spoiled and cowardly. That is the truth of the matter, so why candy coat it ? Your thesis is an excuse to do nothing and accept being a whipped dog .

There is a much better way and you don't have to suck any cock or make excuses like a wuss ! You already caved in without any fight at all. Just rolled right over and rationalized how fat Americans have it hard ? You aint' seen nothing yet and apparently never have so you have already rolled over. Fuck that ! Your thinking is no part of any answer. Wake the fuck up !

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 07:24 | 6498908 Secret Weapon
Secret Weapon's picture

Fight club - yeah baby!

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:03 | 6498375 McCormick No. 9
McCormick No. 9's picture

And to add to the irony (or hypocrisy) is Zerohedge, which professes to be the last bastion of free speech, yet Francis Sawyerizes anyone who doesn't toe the line according to the rules of speech. Someday (soon?) ZH will be hacked and our identities (already known to the NSA) will be known to all that care (the NSA). 

Look, I'm not worried about free speech or gun control. Whenever anyone in history has wanted guns, they got them. As for speech, when someone wants to say something badly enough to endure the consequences, they say it. It would be nice to not have "consequences" hence the "free" part of free speech, but maybe economically, speech should cost something. If I say something the government doesn't like, and I disappear or get shot for it, then everyone knows what I said is important and most likely true. They might not say it themselves, but they'll think it, and they'll think it a lot harder than if I was just shouting in the shouting crowd. This is why restriction on speech reaches a diminishing return. The harder speech is repressed, the greater the impact of what is said by those courageous enough to say it.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:38 | 6498449 gwar5
gwar5's picture

People need to hear what is being said without repression so they can share and self identify with common sentiments and thoughts to associate freely and organize for change which requires a mass effect. Point of repressing free speech is to isolate the individual and keep us apart so we can't organize. That's how they do prisons. 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:09 | 6498497 ZD1
ZD1's picture

Zero Hedge stiffles free speech with this warning:

 

Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated in ANY FORM on this site, including the disparagment of people in the comments section. 

To report any form of discrimination, please right click on the comment number, copy the link to the comment, and send the comment link to abuse [at] zerohedge.com. 

Any user found to be discriminating against ANY race, religion, or affiliation, will be banned immediately, and have their comments removed from the system.

You have been warned. 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:20 | 6498509 atthelake
atthelake's picture

Yet, some racism is allowed.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:34 | 6498520 ZD1
ZD1's picture

Not for long if enough people complain...

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:24 | 6498566 bunnyswanson
bunnyswanson's picture

Anti-Americanism is the new anti-semitism in case no one has noticed.  Every thread is drenched with comments calling for the complete and total annihilation of the USA and her citizens.  All blame for the current unbelievable unfettered felonious activity across the globe has been awarded to Americans.

Who do you think is typing the anti-American comments?  Canadians?  Europeans?  Nah...students on a payroll for Israel.  They take Friday and Saturday off.

Now the blacks are turning on the whites....anti-Whitism a word?  So we have a call for the murder of white people.  Who do you think is saying that?  Not the black people, the grammar used is that of an higher educated person than the inner city black people

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:40 | 6498580 ZD1
ZD1's picture

All on the payroll for Israel? No, but many leftists and anarchists are on the payroll of radical organizations funded by billionaire George Soros.

 

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:50 | 6498594 bunnyswanson
bunnyswanson's picture

Agent of the Rothschilds.  UN Agenda 21 is their Repo Truck. 

 

"Kyle-Anne Shiver wrote for “The American Thinker” she says, “Soros made his first billion in 1992 by shorting the British pound with leveraged billions in financial bets, and became known as the man who broke the Bank of England.  He broke it on the backs of hard-working British citizens who immediately saw their homes severely devalued and their life savings cut drastically…almost overnight.”

 

"In 1994 Soros crowed in “The New Republic” that “the former Soviet Empire is now called the Soros Empire.”  The Russia-gate scandal in 1999, which almost collapsed the Russian economy, was labeled by Rep. Jim Leach, then head of the House Banking Committee, to be “one of the greatest social robberies in human history.”  The “Soros Empire” indeed.

In 1997 Soros almost destroyed the economies of Thailand and Malaysia. The website Greek national Pride reports, “[Soros] was part of the full court press that dismantled Yugoslavia and caused trouble in Georgia, Ukraine and Myanmar [Burma]..” http://theconservativewife.blogspot.com/2014/02/suicidal-bankers-george-...

Soror: “America, as the center of the globalized financial markets, was sucking up the savings of the world.  This is now over. The game is out,”  adding that the time has come for “a very serious adjustment” in American’s consumption habits.  Soros also told “The Australian” that the world financial crisis was”stimulating” and “in a way, the culmination of my life’s work.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 11:33 | 6499702 Victor von Doom
Victor von Doom's picture

"Not for long if enough people complain..."

If Tyler caters to that then this site is dead. Up there for legal reasons? Time will tell.

"My greatest flaw. I surround myself with idiots."

- Victor von Doom

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:15 | 6499404 noless
noless's picture

They added that because at one point like every fucking thread got derailed into some form of overt Jew bashing, it was really unproductive, they barely even enforce it anyway.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:38 | 6498752 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

Trust me every IP address that visits here is already in the black listed database already.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 06:34 | 6498842 Refuse-Resist
Refuse-Resist's picture

'black-list'? That's racist!

 

/s

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 08:09 | 6498965 mvsjcl
mvsjcl's picture

Truly. The whole concept of "hacking" is a red herring. Who the fuck owns the routers, I wonder?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 11:13 | 6499648 Immortal Flatulence
Immortal Flatulence's picture

 

I so agree. In the grand scheme of things, anything internet is both routed, and stored somewhere, making it traceable and discoverable. There is zero privacy, not even for stuff that has been "erased". This is why I think the crypo-currencies offer no anonymity, and sites that say they keep your info secret, really cannot. All internet activity can ultimately become public knowledge, even stuff that is deeply encrypted. The encrypted stuff just takes longer to become public knowledge. All encryption is is a speedbump in the road to being laid bare. My two cents anyway.

 

 

 

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:12 | 6498389 Trucker Glock
Trucker Glock's picture

"The architects of the American police state must think we’re idiots."

In general, they would be right.  A lot of stupid people in this country.  This nation did not get so fucked up because the general public is smart.  Politicians exploit the stupidity of the masses.  People complain about politicians, then end with "They're so stupid.", as if the the fuckers don't know what tthey're doing.  Hint:  They're not the stupid ones.  Okay, many are probably stupid, but they are cunning sociopaths.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:37 | 6498443 Handful of Dust
Handful of Dust's picture

Gruberization at its finest. It's a gradual process. After all, The Fall of Rome was a long process also.

 

The Roman poet Livy wrote that greed and self-indulgence led Romans to dangerous excesses. He said, "For it is true that when men had fewer possessions, they were also modest in their desires. Lately riches have brought avarice and abundant pleasures, and the desire to carry luxury and lust to the point of ruin and universal perdition."

 

http://www.leaderu.com/common/nationsdie.html

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:01 | 6498536 FreedomGuy
FreedomGuy's picture

They are not worried about the stupid ones. They are worried about the smart ones. That is who you go after. It is not a bad idea to make an example of them, as well.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:32 | 6498750 dreadnaught
dreadnaught's picture

Does it matter? soon the 2 party National Convention halls with be filled not with standards showing the location of your (50) states group location, ie NY, Wyoming, Nevada etc, but with standards bearing the names of

Monsanto, General Dynamics, The Dole corporation, Nestle, Lockheed, Martin Marrietta, Microsoft, Starbucks etc etc etc a nation by and of the Corporations

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:10 | 6498394 venturen
venturen's picture

what is amazing is how the left is all for fake liberal news....believe everything and anything the clintons or Obama or their other leader say.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:12 | 6498405 numapepi
numapepi's picture

Again... the new class echo chamber.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:12 | 6498402 numapepi
numapepi's picture

The author talks of the new class yet knows not of the new class.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:14 | 6498408 Ms No
Ms No's picture

They don't just think we are idiots, they know that we are.  After China's currency stink there were 3 explosions and even a retaliatory explosion and people are falling all over themselves trying to come up with a reason why this is to be expected when trade slows down and chemicals are left sitting around. 

Then you have the fact that the US population is being monkey hammered with a massive and relentless terror operation involving mass shootings which ocurring on a constant basis and people are falling all over themselves again trying to explain how this is to be expected due to a bad economy, too many weapons and various other rationalizations.  People think that the spooks will unleash havoc everywhere else but surely wouldn't do it here.  It's incredible to watch and not in a good way.

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:19 | 6498410 Himins
Himins's picture

You can't "take our country back" If you are the one destroying it.

It's like, you can't put a cigarette out, unless you light it first.

These 2 phenomenons work on the same principle.

Edit:
to my junker, this was a reference to Hillary Clintons *free speech* gone wild. 

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:16 | 6498412 spoonful
spoonful's picture

The end result:  A nation of sheep lined up for the slaughterhouse.

And while they're in line line waiting to be slaughtered, they'll be saying "i really don't care if they're watching and listening to me.  I have nothing to hide . . ." 

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:57 | 6498479 FLHRS
FLHRS's picture

I would double up arrow that comment if I could.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:27 | 6498517 Wannabe_Oracle
Wannabe_Oracle's picture

"i really don't care if they're watching and listening to me.  I have nothing to hide . . ."

 

You nailed it! This is exactly what my friends and family tell me when I voice my concerns about privacy - I sit there in total disbelief.....

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:04 | 6498766 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

Yeah they like to play there mind games, until you throw it in there face! Then they wish... tada they hadn't. But its to late ant it, lol... sorry typos

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 03:20 | 6498686 Rory_Breaker
Rory_Breaker's picture

I just need enough facebook likes dammit

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:19 | 6498416 brown_hornet
brown_hornet's picture

I would hope that I could be described by the second to last line in the post.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:21 | 6498419 sysin3
sysin3's picture

Total horseshit. The author wouldn't know a logical inference if it bit him on the ass.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:25 | 6498421 q99x2
q99x2's picture

By de facto it is not the Supreme Court of the United States of America but a court of the NWO that you talk about. It is not the United States Supreme Court but a branch of an invasive and deadly enemy. The thing is that the invasion of globalists that have been bribed by the banksters are scared shitless at this time because they have to fight Russia, China, the rest of the BRICS and they have to hold standing armies in all their occupied nations. They know what happened to Hitler and are well aware that it can happen to them. Not even Hitler was fighting on as many fronts as these assholes. WWIII the world war against banksters.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:34 | 6498445 cherry picker
cherry picker's picture

What are the soldiers fighting for, the ones that actually fight nowadays?

They always tell us to keep us free.

Free from what?

The freedom of bureaucrats, corporations, schools and universities to tell us what, how, who and where to think, say or do?

The common man is being crushed.

It is against the law in many places to be homeless.  It is against the law not to have ID.  It is against the law to have secrets.  You don't 'own' property anymore.  Your wage is no longer yours, it belongs to the state.

The USA is slowly becoming a scourge upon this planet and its citizens drowning in IPhone/Android/Windows10/Facebook/Twitter frenzy are oblivious to what is occurring.

The race to see who the next President is illustrative of this.  The country does not realize how much it has deteriorated.

Each resident of the USA is subject to the whims of at least three if not more government bodies, county, state and fed, many with overlapping services. Military police forces, a ton of them are all over.  Students clamor for a career in criminology falsely believing that police work is similar to what they see on TV.

Freedom of speech has been dead for awhile, just try asking your representative an unpopular questions and they will bring you to your knees.

You guys need to get your dignity as humans back then maybe you can address this travesty, meanwhile they will keep on rolling over you with your money in their wallets.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:21 | 6498511 Rhal
Rhal's picture

Well said. And many vetrans come home and agree. 

I wonder sometimes if I might get arrested for declaring that I am not free...

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:41 | 6498450 Himins
Himins's picture

Best article I've read on ZH for a while, perhaps never have I enjoyed such a word smith more.

Tue, 09/01/2015 - 23:52 | 6498472 Monetas
Monetas's picture

Don´t look at me .... I´m doing my part .... to use the forbidden words, Niggahs !

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:54 | 6498763 22winmag
22winmag's picture

P0rchm0nk3y5

 

There, I said it.

 

I will never forget when my sergeant said "Some men are black men, and some men are n1gg3r5, but I can be both."

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:19 | 6498776 wizteknet
wizteknet's picture

cp

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:06 | 6498494 City_Of_Champyinz
City_Of_Champyinz's picture

Too funny....

the only difference between a slaughterhouse that kills pigs & one that kills cows is only the pigs know its coming...

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:15 | 6498504 russwinter
russwinter's picture

Massive Troll Campaign Underway Against Newly Coverted Truthers:

http://winteractionables.com/?p=24627

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:52 | 6498522 honestann
honestann's picture

Architects of police state must think we’re idiots.

We’re being moved towards totalitarian society.

They are correct, people are idiots.  Let's make this a bit more clear.  If people can't see what the predators-that-be are doing, they are idiots.  If people can see what the predators-that-be are doing, and they just talk about it, and believe talking about it has any positive effect, they are even more extreme idiots.  To imagine that animal predators will care what people say requires they be dumber than a rock.  Which is a fairly accurate assessment of the vast majority of human beings, including commentators.

The society has been totalitarian for quite some time.  Think about it.  The term "totalitarian" cannot possibly mean "total control in fact".  That would require laws specify the number of times you move your toothbrush back and forth when you brush your teeth, as well as the velocity you move the brush, as well as the pressure you apply to the brush against your teeth... and so forth.  And similar for every single possible activity that any human could take.  This is obviously impossible.  There isn't enough material in the universe to print or encode every possible law to create this sort of "total" control.

No, what "totalitarian" means is... the predators-that-be can get away with making any law they wish, and enforcing whenever convenient for them.  This threshhold was past decades ago.

The most relevant proof of idiocy and insanity is... prognasticators especially, but everyone else, imagines predators will stop without being physically made to stop.  That is so insane as to be mind-boggling... but only to sane individuals who case see what is in front of their faces, and understand the nature of predators.  Not very difficult topics, but obviously too obscure for modern human beings.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 00:59 | 6498529 monad
monad's picture

Lady, I ran the best division of *my* army. It's just a matter of training converts efficiently, as fast as you can, when they realize they have to go. Now.

You want to live by yourself in the scrub? Thats like chosing to be a nun. Thats quitting and dying. Now.

Life is a moving target. Life wants you to get your ass up and move. Now.

We have to go. Now.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:51 | 6498593 honestann
honestann's picture

I did get up off my ass and move.  That's precisely what I did in fact.

And I'm loving my new life.  I am really living!  I grow and raise all my own food, I generate my own power, I have my own water, I have fuel for years (for my airplane), I am self-sufficient.  As the crash happens, I'm already set.

That's called "thinking and acting ahead".

That is NOT lying down and dying... just the exact opposite.

I have total respect for your approach.  The only problem is...

MUCH TOO LATE.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:20 | 6498602 monad
monad's picture

In the punk movement we said, Too Much, Too Young, Too Soon. Too Little. Too Late.

And it was true. then. Now its just too stupid. Balls up or die.

You didn't change shit. You ran away. Whatever God is, whatever Life is, you and I must breed together to continue it. Without breeding everything stops. If you don't grow children, you stop being involved.You watched your generations die, and you see, what?

No Future. No Future. No Future For You.

I know alot. I might be the most capable leader, right now. Where are my babies? In the end, this is all that matters to me.

.

.

.

You never cared about mine. Why would I....

MULTIGENERATIONAL TRANSFER

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 03:20 | 6498685 honestann
honestann's picture

I tried to ally and collaborate with human beings for years... actually, over a decade.  But humans are dumber than rocks, in total denial, and suffer so much normalcy bias they shall die from it.  The also suffer the boiled frog syndrome in spades.

I have your way a try.  I WASTED MY TIME.

When you try the same thing forever, and stand in front of the speeding train you see coming, trying to urge morons to get off the track, then you too are insane and hopeless as you get run the frack over and squashed.

Well, I'm not insane, and I'm not hopeless.  I would have been happy to collaborate.  Tried it.  Didn't work.  Maybe you're a better organizer.  I HOPE SO.  Best wishes to you and the sheep you attempt to herd.  You need it.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:16 | 6498730 monad
monad's picture

I like you. You have good judgment. You don't date assholes. I don't either. Don't stop trying. Life isn't a zero sum game. The children are the children of people like you who persevered through the BS and propaganda. The odds may suck but you have evidence that you'll win if you stick it out. The progress of human intellect is you.

Do the work, its all yours.

I love you Ann. You are not alone. Do you think if you married me it would change your mind?

I am free and I am alone. I know stuff you don't. These were my primary goals. i didn't get the secondaries - no family, no love, but I carry the most knowledge, as far as we go.

Consider your choices, love. This meant something to you, once. No judgement, maybe it doesn't now. You are free. You can come back if you change your mind.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:51 | 6498761 22winmag
22winmag's picture

Tylers please move this sappy stuff to Match... or Tinder.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 16:01 | 6501274 HughBriss
HughBriss's picture

Sooo, tell me about muzzling free speech again...?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:51 | 6498757 monad
monad's picture

since feeling is first

who pays any attention

to the syntax of things

will never wholly kiss you;

 

wholly to be a fool

while Spring is in the world

 

my blood approves

And kisses are a better fate

than wisdom

lady i swear by all flowers. Don't cry

- the best gesture of my brain is less than

your eyelids' flutter which says

 

we are for each other: then

laugh, leaning back in my arms

for life's not a paragraph

 

and death i think is no parenthesis

- e e cummings

 

Please consider that the progression of the human species is tied to happiness and loe more than reason. I'm a math guy. But I'm still of the real world, not the model. Unless you date me, which I think we'd both enjoy, I won't won't give you any more clues to my work.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:20 | 6498619 bunnyswanson
bunnyswanson's picture

If you have a social security as a resident of Alaska, you are on the bulletin board somewhere.  You have internet access.  They will hunt you down like a Nazi. 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:30 | 6498623 monad
monad's picture

Bunny, no matter how fucked up your military casualty adoption was since LBJ, white or black, all legal immigrants have always got 2 years welfare + at least 2 years community college on your childrens' backs. Not free. On your children's pink. Your children do not qualify for any of these and many other programs.

Clear?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:58 | 6498658 bunnyswanson
bunnyswanson's picture

Our society is just as it has been designed to be.  Political system reeks of the stench of desperate politicians who will say and do anything to win, even if it breaks the back of the country they want to "lead."

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:02 | 6498725 monad
monad's picture

We have 2 options Fight or bend over.

I don't bend. I don't get baited by dumb homo feds either.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:44 | 6498758 22winmag
22winmag's picture

Watch the closing scene of Red State.

 

Homo ATFE agents passing judgment on a straight agent.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 03:15 | 6498677 honestann
honestann's picture

I don't live anywhere near the evil empire.

-----

I moved to the southern hemisphere nearly 4 years ago.  I don't live in any location that is claimed as jurisdiction of the evil empire or any of its cronies (USSA, UK, AU, CA, NZ, etc).  I don't want or receive anything from any fictitious government.  I do have internet access, but it is re-directed and repeated several times, including through hardware that I personally installed in obscure places.

Plus... I have almost nothing left to steal, since 90% of my physical metal got converted into my self-sufficient digs in the extreme boonies, 125km from the nearest human being.  Nobody gives a crap about me, and that's the way I like it.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:30 | 6498747 bunnyswanson
bunnyswanson's picture

Well, I envy you.  Good job.  I am a Canadian stuck in central california.  I have invested in a gallon of vodka and will plan to go sit in the garage.  As Suze said, where you are old and poor, you want to die.  (I am 57).  I put money in my house and have about 30 grand in gold/diamond/silver which I will never get to cash in, it appears.  Support staff is the middle class, and I am being eliminated, by all appearances.  If I tried to leave now, I'd probably die of thirst in 10,000 car traffic jam. 

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:42 | 6498756 22winmag
22winmag's picture

You're going to miss all the fireworks.

 

All of the booms and flashes will be breathtaking.

 

Meanwhile, you will be on the side of a hill in some backwater watching a lame-ass rainbow for the umpteenth time.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 06:38 | 6498845 Pliskin
Pliskin's picture

I, for one, enjoy meeting friends, going to the bar, visiting museums and art galleries.  I regulalry attend concerts and once a month fly off to a beautiful spot with sandy beaches and crystal clear waters for a spot of SCUBA diving.  I enjoy frequenting my favourite Go-Go bar, neon lights, pretty girls and expensive drink.  I take great pleasure in seeing my family happy, and I love a good party.  I live in a city of 7 million and love to go out and meet new people with their own ideas and positions on things.  I enjoy debating, learning and experiencing as much as I can in this life.

But, then, I guess I'm not a Legend like you.

Good luck with your self-imposed hermitry.

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:49 | 6499272 honestann
honestann's picture

I hate cities, so to each her own.  If I'm in the mood for a pretty girl, I simply go look in the mirror (blush).  I love peace, quiet, nature... not blaring sound and music, not flashing lights, not mindless monkeys gyrating and bouncing off walls (literally or figuratively).

I do love tropical beaches, warm clear waters, snorkel and scuba.  But since I moved to my new self-sufficient digs in the southern hemisphere, and bought my new toy (my brand new albeit tiny, high-tech, super-efficient airplane), I've flown all the way back and forth across the south pacific three times already, and visited all sorts of obscure as well as well-known islands and islands groups in the process.  All the way from the ascension islands in the atlantic to perth.  I haven't wandered the indian ocean yet... the maldives should be spiffy.  Maybe someday I'll get there, but after so much flying for a year or so, I've cut back substantially.  Got my fill for a while, so to speak.  Now I take much shorter trips, usually just one day or two, and not as often.

Some of us enjoy solitude.  I do.  I have no family, and I can keep in touch with the very few friends I have via email and skype.  I am the opposite of legend, an uncertified nobody really.  I'm a real-world hermit.  Absent the internet, I'd literally be nobody as far as everyone on the planet is concerned.  And frankly, quite often I think seriously about pulling the plug.  I don't need human beings.  99.99999% of them are insane, a waste, and outright dangerous one way or other.

But I totally believe in the "live and let live" approach, so while my approach is superb for me, and makes me happy, your approach may be just as perfect for you.  And I find nothing odd or wrong about that.  However, when the world collapses, I must say, I will be vastly safer here, living my chosen lifestyle.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 08:38 | 6499053 fiftybagger
fiftybagger's picture

9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: 10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world.

1 Corinthians 5 King James Bible

15 I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil. 16 They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.

John 17 King James Bible

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:31 | 6498748 22winmag
22winmag's picture

It's not too late.

 

Not by a long-shot.

 

Thousands of armed and unarmed AMERICAN INSURGENTS are born every day in the financial wreckage. People who withdraw such as yourself are every bit as important and effective as the ones who take up arms. An insurgent citizenry can sustain far more losses and impose it's will far more than any .gov can.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:21 | 6498561 HippieHaulers
HippieHaulers's picture

Right, right. We're all so dumb and everything is getting worse and buy my book.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:23 | 6498565 scatha
scatha's picture

Numerous studies of torture, extreme social isolation, sustenance deprivation and sense deprivation conducted by the CIA and the military have clinically proven that human being could, be reduced, through the physical and pharmacological means to the form of a biological automata devoid of what we would call innate morality and/or social identity.

The similar effect have been obtained via the social manipulation through means of social propaganda on the  massive scale of billions who in the zombie dreamlike state walking the earth as we speak. Most of those moral zombies however did not completely loose  their humanity but the ruling elites had it suppressed, breaking peoples down into ultimate submission to the socio-political system.

If you really want to know what the society really is?

Check this out:

https://contrarianopinion.wordpress.com/2015/07/17/matrix-of-control-a-s...

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 01:32 | 6498572 JR
JR's picture

What kind of government, what kind of justice, can the American people expect when the U.S. Senate approves radicals as justices to the U.S. Supreme Court?

What kind of government puts a leading ACLU lawyer and abortion activist, feminist Ruth Bader Ginsberg, on the court who advocates using foreign law and norms to shape U.S. law in judicial opinions and a feminist and Hispanic-issues radical, Sonia Sotomayor, on the court?

What kind of government does America have, what kind of July 4th celebration can she have when her Congress appoints an open opponent to the significance of the Declaration of Independence as a final rule of law, Elena Kagan, whose conflicts of interest include ties to Goldman as a former paid member of the Research Advisory Council of the Goldman Sachs Global Markets Institute?

What kind of government can protect its Christian values when it appoints justices such as Kagan and Ginsberg who were guaranteed votes for homosexual marriage and performed same-sex marriages before the final decision came down?

What kind of government do the American people have when severe cultural differences that already divide Americans are exacerbated by the appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court of a La Raza official, Sonia Sotomayor, whose stated purpose purpose in a speech published in the La Raza Journal is to promote the Hispanic and “people of color” cultures over America's white European culture?

Well, We the People can expect what we’ve got: a dependable, predictable, radical, socialist vote on the court and individual justice be damned. There never is any doubt where the four liberals (three Jewish and one Latino) are going to vote on any issue. It’s for corrupt, repressive,  Godless collectivism. And, now, Justice John Roberts has turned out to be a collectivist-welfare wolf in individual-liberty sheep’s clothing.This means that the judicial system has been co-opted by a political system able to produce a president who will appoint Supreme Court justices based on politics: in short, it is an unworkable system where liberty and justice for all is the goal.

It is the destruction of all that the country has known of individual freedom and individual enterprise; it is a government now completely corrupt. And if you don’t’ think it is, look at the people running for president.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:18 | 6498604 ZD1
ZD1's picture

Justice Elena Kagan’s 2009 testimony before the Senate during confirmation hearings on her nomination to be Solicitor General. In the course of that testimony, Kagan stated: “There is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage.” Unfortunately, the issue never came up during Kagan’s confirmation hearings to be a Supreme Court Justice.

Kagan joined the majority in June when the court legalized gay marriage across the nation.

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled against the Kentucky county clerk who has refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses. Her lawyers with the Liberty Counsel had filed a last-ditch appeal to the Supreme Court on Friday, asking that they grant her "asylum for her conscience." Justice Elena Kagan, who oversees the 6th District, referred the request to the full court, which denied the stay without comment.

 

 

http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/06/elena-kagan-2009-there-is-no-federa...

 

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:44 | 6498637 JR
JR's picture

William A. Jacobsen of Legal Insurrection explains: "This doesn’t mean that Kagan opposes gay marriage. But she clearly believes it is a matter for the political process, not a constitutional right," i.e., an evasion.

He said that “for Kagan to take the position that her answer left open the possibility that she merely was making a statement as to the present state of the law as to gay marriage, and not what she believed, would represent a clear deception.”

Which it was.

Because “then supporting gay marriage may have sunk her nomination…”

As for the 5-4 ruling for gay marriage that Kagan supported, her vote for was apparent “based on her comments during oral argument, via NY Times”:

Justice Elena Kagan said allowing same-sex marriage would benefit children. “More adopted children and more marital households, whether same-sex or other-sex, seems to be a good thing,” she said.

Mr. Bursch said the bans he was defending did not discriminate based on sexual orientation, which left Justice Kagan puzzled.

“If you prevent people from wearing yarmulkes,” she said, “you know, that’s discrimination against Jews.”…

Near the conclusion of the first argument, Justice Kagan indicated that she hoped the Supreme Court would find a right to same-sex marriage. She said the court has a role in protecting minorities even when majorities made their views known at the polls.

“We don’t live in a pure democracy,” she said. “We live in a constitutional democracy.” (end NY Times)

http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/06/elena-kagan-2009-there-is-no-federal-constitutional-right-to-same-sex-marriag

As for adoption of children by homosexual couples, it represents a heinous picture of American tolerance for abuse of their most innocent and weakest members: “In one recent study of gay male couples, 41.3% had open sexual agreements with some conditions or restrictions, and 10% had open sexual agreements with no restrictions on sex with outside partners. One-fifth of participants (21.9%) reported breaking their agreement in the preceding 12 months, and 13.2% of the sample reported having unprotected anal intercourse in the preceding three months with an outside partner of unknown or discordant HIV-status (1).”

http://josephnicolosi.com/an-open-secret-the-truth-about/

Regarding The Supreme Court on Monday ruled against the Kentucky county clerk who has refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses, I am anticipating the day when this current system of judicial coercion cracks down the middle and Americans en masse defy the center where the spider of this evil web resides -- the USFed Reserve.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:21 | 6498617 ZD1
ZD1's picture

During a 2001 speech at the University of California’s Berkeley School of Law, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

“Imagine a judicial nominee said ‘my experience as a white man makes me better than a latina woman,’” blogged former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, “Wouldn’t they have to withdraw?

http://www.wnd.com/2009/05/99420/

Sonia Sotomayor supports affirmative action programs and said that she was absolutely horrified that the 14th Amendment can be used to prevent state government from engaging in race-based discrimination.

http://www.bookwormroom.com/2014/04/24/sonia-sotomayors-absolutely-revol...

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:14 | 6498611 finnzero
finnzero's picture

Finnish news sites are currently closing comment sections. In the land that has bolstered it's the most free'est and and objectivitest and bestest and whatever press in the whole world, one just doesn't simply comment news in politically incorrect ways.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:16 | 6498616 CHX
CHX's picture

R.I.P. constitutional rights. 

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:21 | 6498741 22winmag
22winmag's picture

Hello God-given rights!

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 03:06 | 6498626 demur
demur's picture

Lo and Behold

The framers case against lawless government

 

 

Federalist No. 1: “A dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidden appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government. History will teach us that the former has been found a much more certain road to the introduction of despotism than the latter, and that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants.”  (Lo and behold, this rights crusading strategy used by federal and state governments barrels full steam ahead).

 

Federalist No. 1: “An over-scrupulous jealousy of danger to the rights of the people, which is more commonly the fault of the head than of the heart, will be represented as mere pretense and artifice, the stale bait for popularity at the expense of the public good.”  (Lo and behold, the stale artificial bait of popularity has caught nearly every public officer and member of the union).

 

Federalist No. 6: “Favorites of a king or of a people, have in too many instances abused the confidence they possessed; and assuming the pretext of some public motive, have not scrupled to sacrifice the national tranquility to personal advantage or personal gratification.”

(Lo and behold, socialistic officials and masses arrogantly scruple at the expense of America’s tranquility and their own progeny).

 

 

 

 

 

Federalist No. 6: “Momentary passions, and immediate interest, have a more active and imperious control over human conduct than general or remote considerations of policy, utility or justice.”  (Lo and behold, governments appeal to emotion, passion and immediate interest has blossomed at the expense of justice).

 

Federalist No. 8: “Safety from external danger is the most powerful director of national conduct. Even the ardent love of liberty will, after a time, give way to its dictates . . . the continual effort and alarm attendant on a state of continual danger, will compel nations the most attached to liberty to resort for repose and security to institutions which have a tendency to destroy their civil and political rights. To be more safe, they at length become willing to run the risk of being less free.” (Lo and behold, the bankrupt federal government is taking advantage of this strategy to justify tyrannical advances).

 

Federalist No. 10: “A rage for paper money, for an abolition of debts, for an equal division of property, or for any other improper or wicked project, will be less apt to pervade the whole body of the Union than a particular member of it.” (Lo and behold, wicked projects have pervaded the whole body and particular members (states)).

 

Federalist No.17: “It may be said that [the principle of legislation] would tend to render the government of the Union too powerful, and to enable it to absorb those residuary authorities, which it might be judged proper to leave with the States for local purposes. I confess I am at a loss to discover what temptation the persons entrusted with the administration of the general government could ever feel to divest the States of the authorities of that description. The regulation of the mere domestic police of a State appears to me to hold out slender allurements to ambition.” (Lo and behold, the temptation has not only been exploited, states are complicit in the seduction of authority).

 

 

Federalist No. 17: “But let it be admitted, for argument's sake, that mere wantonness and lust of domination would be sufficient to beget that disposition;” “still it may be safely affirmed, that the sense of the constituent body of the national representatives, or, in other words, the people of the several States, would control the indulgence of so extravagant an appetite.”  (Lo and behold, ignorant masses are so incessant to gratify appetites, they forfeit their independence and progeny to the federal government in order to fill them).

 

Federalist No. 22: “Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation.”  (Lo and behold, false interpretation of the constitution by judges has not only created dead letters but converted law into an instrument of plunder and defense of the constitution into a crime).

 

Federalist No. 28: “When will the time arrive that the federal government can raise and maintain an army capable of erecting a despotism over the great body of the people of an immense empire, who are in a situation, through the medium of their State governments, to take measures for their own defense, with all the celerity, regularity, and system of independent nations? The apprehension may be considered as a disease, for which there can be found no cure in the resources of argument and reasoning.”  (Lo and behold, this disease has spread from head to toe and the medicine to cure it is rejected by the lawless federal government and masses).

 

Federalist No. 30: “Who would loan to a government that prefaced [began] its overtures for borrowing by an act which demonstrated that no reliance could be placed on the steadiness of its measures for paying? (Lo and behold, propagandized nations and US citizens fund it wholeheartedly).

 

 

 

 

Federalist No. 31: “I repeat here what I have observed in substance in another place, that all observations founded upon the danger of usurpation ought to be referred to the composition and structure of the government, not

to the nature or extent of its powers. The State governments, by their original constitutions, are invested with complete sovereignty.  It is by far the safest course . . . to confine our attention wholly to the nature and extent of the powers as they are delineated in the Constitution. Every thing beyond this must be left to the prudence and firmness of the people; who, as they will hold the scales in their own hands . . . will always take care to preserve the constitutional equilibrium between the general and the State governments.”  (Lo and behold, the majority of “Americans” no longer comprehend prudence or firmness).

 

Federalist No. 32: "The individual States should possess an independent and uncontrollable authority to raise their own revenues for the supply of their own wants. And making this concession, I affirm that (with the sole exception of duties on imports and exports) they would, under the plan of the convention, retain that authority in the most absolute and unqualified sense; and that an attempt on the part of the national government to abridge them in the exercise of it, would be a violent assumption of power, unwarranted by any article or clause of its Constitution.”  (Lo and behold, states condone the assumption of power by the federal government).  

 

Federalist No. 33:  “But it will not follow . . . that acts of the large society [federal government] which are NOT PURSUANT to its constitutional powers, but which are invasions of the residuary [state] authorities of the smaller societies, will become the supreme law of the land. These will be merely acts of usurpation, and will deserve to be treated as such.” (Lo and behold, law abiding Americans trying to treat usurpations as such are ignored, demonized and labeled enemies of state).

 

 

 

Federalist No. 33: “the supremacy of the laws of the Union . . . only declares a truth, which flows immediately and necessarily from “the institution of a federal government. It will not, I presume, have escaped observation, that it EXPRESSLY confines this supremacy to laws made PURSUANT TO THE CONSTITUTION.(Lo and behold, officials and masses disregard the supreme law of the land and framers writings explaining the limited constitutional jurisdiction of the federal government).

 

Federalist No. 36: “The United States will either wholly abstain from the objects preoccupied for local purposes, or will make use of the State officers and State regulations for collecting additional impositions . . . If such a spirit should infest the councils of the Union, the most certain road to the accomplishment of its aim would be to employ the State officers as much as possible, and to attach them to the Union by an accumulation of their emoluments. This would serve to turn the tide of State influence into the channels of the national government. But all suppositions of this kind are invidious, and ought to be banished from the consideration of the great question before the people.”  (Lo and behold, federal invidious suppositions are embraced by states; the states and Feds tyrannical convergence is destroying liberty).

 

Federalist No. 8: "The perpetual menacing’s of danger oblige the government to be always prepared to repel it; The continual necessity for [military] services enhances the importance of the soldier, and proportionally degrades the condition of the citizen. The military state becomes elevated above the civil. The inhabitants . . . are unavoidably subjected to frequent infringements on their rights, which serve to weaken their sense of those rights . . . The transition from this disposition . . . is neither remote nor difficult; but it is very difficult to prevail upon a people under such impressions, to make a bold or effectual resistance to usurpations supported by the military power.” (Lo and behold, the government military/media industrial complex fabricates dangers to elevate the state as conditioned “Americans” relinquish liberty for safety). 

Federalist No. 15:  . . . The United States has an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either, by regulations extending to the individual citizens of America. (Lo and behold, countless regulations and agencies pilfer law abiding Americans and destroy the free marketplace). 

 

Federalist No. 17: “The administration of private justice between the citizens of the same State, the supervision of agriculture and of other concerns of a similar nature, all those things, in short, which are proper to be provided for by local legislation, can never be desirable cares of a general jurisdiction. But let it be admitted, for argument's sake, that mere wantonness and lust of domination would be sufficient to beget that disposition; still it may be safely affirmed, that the sense of the constituent body of the national representatives, or, in other words, the people of the several States, would control the indulgence of so extravagant an appetite.” (Lo and behold, foolish masses manifest the opposite disposition.  They couldn’t care a less to control the feds extravagant usurping appetite).

 

 

Federalist No. 28:  Would . . . militia, irritated by being called upon [by the federal government] to undertake a . . . hopeless expedition, for the purpose of riveting [imposing] the chains of “slavery upon a part of their countrymen, direct their course, but to the seat of the tyrants [instead], [tyrants] who had meditated so foolish as well as so wicked a project, to crush them in their imagined entrenchment's of [lawful] power, and to make them [federal officials] an example of the just vengeance of an abused and incensed people? Is this the way in which usurpers stride to dominion over a numerous and enlightened nation? Do they begin by exciting the detestation of the very instruments of their intended usurpations? Do they usually commence their career by wanton and disgustful acts of power, calculated to answer no end, but to draw upon themselves universal hatred and execrations? . . . If we were even to suppose the national rulers actuated by the most ungovernable ambition, it is impossible to believe that they would employ such preposterous means to accomplish their designs.” (Lo and behold, the federal government presently employs disgustful acts of wanton power and wicked preposterous ambitions with impunity).

 

Federalist No. 32: “The plan of the convention aims only at a partial union or consolidation, the State governments . . . clearly retain all the rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, EXCLUSIVELY delegated to the United States”.  (Lo and behold, the states have sold out many of their rights to the federal government).

 

Federalist No. 40: “Do these principles, in fine, require that the powers of the general government should be limited, and that, beyond this limit, the “States should be left in possession of their sovereignty and independence? We have seen that in the new government, as in the old, the general powers are limited; and that the States, in all unenumerated cases, are left in the enjoyment of their sovereign and independent jurisdiction.” (Lo and behold, the federal government has gone far beyond its limited jurisdiction and states have renounced much of their sovereignty).

 

Federalist No. 45: "Were the plan of the convention adverse to the public happiness, my voice would be, Reject the plan. Were the Union itself inconsistent with the public happiness [liberty], it would be, abolish the Union.” (Lo and behold, the union has become inconsistent with liberty. Instead of seeking to abolish lawlessness, states and masses condone the inconsistency).

 

Federalist No. 46: “If the people should in the future become more partial to the federal than to the State governments, the change can only result from such manifest and irresistible proofs of a better administration . . . And in that case, the people ought not surely to be precluded from giving most of their confidence where they may discover it to be most due; but even in that case the State governments could have little to apprehend, because it is only within a certain [enumerated] sphere that the federal power can, in the nature of things, be advantageously administered.” (Lo and behold, the federal government exercises a majority of power outside it’s enumerated sphere. States have much to apprehend but reject the apprehension).

 

Federalist No. 46: “But ambitious encroachments of the federal government, on the authority of the State governments, would not excite the opposition of a single State, or of a few States only. They would be signals of general alarm. Every government would espouse the common cause. A correspondence would be opened. Plans of resistance would be concerted. One spirit would animate and conduct the whole. The same combinations, in short, would result from an apprehension of the federal, as was produced by the dread of a foreign, yoke; and unless the projected innovations should be voluntarily renounced, the same appeal to a trial of force would be made in the one case as was made in the other. But what degree of madness could ever drive the federal government to such an extremity." (Lo and behold, the federal government is presently driven to maddened extremities due to bankruptcy resulting from lawless policies.  States are not alarmed but passengers in the drive).

 

Federalist No. 46: "The only refuge left for those who prophesy the downfall of the State governments is the visionary supposition that the federal government may . . . accumulate a military force for the projects of ambition. The reasonings contained in these papers must have been employed to little purpose indeed, if it could be necessary now to disprove the reality of this danger. That the people and the States should, for a sufficient period of time, elect an uninterrupted succession of men ready to betray both; that the traitors should, throughout this period, uniformly and systematically pursue some fixed plan for the extension of the military establishment; that the governments and the people of the States should silently and patiently behold the gathering storm, and continue to supply the materials, until it should be prepared to burst on their own heads, must appear to every one more like the incoherent dreams of a delirious jealousy, or the misjudged exaggerations of a counterfeit zeal, than like the sober apprehensions of genuine patriotism. Extravagant as the supposition is, let it however be made. Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence." (Lo and behold, counterfeit federal and state politicians are actualizing their extravagant incoherent dreams while labeling constitution loving patriot militia as extremist).

 

Federalist No. 49: “Judges can exercise no executive prerogative, though they are shoots from the executive stock; nor any legislative function, though they may be advised by the legislative councils. . . . Were the power of judging joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control. . . the judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them.” (Lo and behold, judges presently legislate from the bench and exercise arbitrary control).

 

Federalist No. 49: “It is equally evident, that none of them [branches of government] ought to possess, directly or indirectly, an overruling influence over the others, in the administration of their respective powers. It will not be denied, that power is of an encroaching nature, and that it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it.” (Lo and behold, effectual restraints hardly exist at present).

 

 

 

Federalist No. 49: “How are the encroachments of the stronger to be prevented, or the wrongs of the weaker to be redressed, without an appeal to the people themselves, who, as the grantors of the commissions, can alone declare its true meaning, and enforce its observance? There is certainly great force in this reasoning, and it must be allowed to prove that a constitutional road to the decision of the people ought to be marked out and kept open, for certain great and extraordinary occasions." (Lo and behold, the remedy of nullification provided by the framers for the present extraordinary crisis, is rejected by public officials).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:27 | 6498628 pachanguero
pachanguero's picture

Hitlery for prison 2016!

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:22 | 6498743 dreadnaught
dreadnaught's picture

and throw Jeb in for good measure

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 02:50 | 6498647 demur
demur's picture

RESTORING AND PROTECTING AMERICA

Preserving liberty, families, free markets and our future

 

Federalist No. 1, Hamilton:  “ . . . [A] dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious [phony] mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidden appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government. History will teach us that the former has been found a much more certain road to the introduction of despotism than the latter, and that those men who have overturned republics . . . have begun their career by paying an obsequious [excessively attentive] court to the people; commencing demagogues [manipulators], and ending tyrants”. Unfortunately, nearly every modern politician characterizes the demagogues and despots Alexander Hamilton warned about.

 

Words cannot express the outrage of We The People.  The US federal government is now a regime worse than the one our Founding Generation sacrificed life and limb to overthrow.  Without batting an eye, “rights crusading” public officials routinely disregard sworn oaths to uphold the constitution, as explained by the framers.   Consequently, tyranny has raised its head and our economy on the brink of disaster. These dire circumstances are primarily the result of the federal governments longstanding abuse of the welfare, commerce and necessary & proper clauses of the constitution.

 

Accordingly, many law abiding Americans are studying the framers remedy of NULLIFICATION.  It requires that states reject lawless federal encroachments on their sovereignty to protect citizens’ liberty and independence.

 

The Federalist Papers are authoritative as to the genuine meaning of the constitution; NOT the erroneous interpretations of legislatures, presidents or judges.  The Declaration of Independence requires Our public servants obey the Constitution, not the federal government!

 

WELFARE CLAUSE

 

Referring to the WELFARE CLAUSE, James Madison, the author of the constitution, in Federalist No. 41:  It would be an “absurd misconstruction” [error] that the power “to lay and collect taxes, duties, impost and excises, to pay debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States” amounts to an unlimited commission [authority] to exercise every power which may be alleged to be necessary for the common defense or general welfare . . .

 

Federalist No. 83:  The plan of the [constitutional] convention declares that the power of congress . . . shall extend to certain enumerated [clearly listed] cases. This specification of particulars evidently excludes all pretenses [claims] to a general legislative authority, because an affirmative grant of special powers would be absurd . . . if a general authority was intended. 

 

Federalist No. 45:  The powers delegated by the proposed constitution are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce.  The powers reserved to the States will extend to all the objects, which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties and properties of the people.

 

Federalist No. 14:  the general [federal] government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects [powers].

 

In a letter to James Robertson, Madison said: “With respect to the words “General welfare” I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense, would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character, which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its Creators.”

 

The welfare clause does not authorize government to intervene in every case concerning the welfare of its citizens. These cases would obviously be limitless and require unlimited power to oversee, a clear contradiction of the restricted federal governments jurisdiction.

 

INTERSTATE COMMERCE CLAUSE

 

The second way government officials disregard the Constitution involves perversion of the INTERSTATE COMMERCE CLAUSE.   The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 kept by Madison show that the interstate commerce clause was established to prohibit states from imposing tolls and tariffs [taxes] on articles of import and export-goods and commodities-merchandise-as they are transported through the states for the purpose of buying and selling; and to permit the federal government to impose duties [tariffs] on imports and exports, both inland and abroad (tariffs and excise taxes were intended to be the primary source of revenue to fund the federal government).

 

In Federalist No. 22, Hamilton: “The interfering of some States . . . have . . . given just cause of . . . complaint to others, and . . . impediments to the intercourse between the different parts of the Confederacy.  The commerce of the German empire . . . is in continual trammels [snares] from the multiplicity of . . . duties which the several princes and states exact upon the merchandise passing through their territories . . . though the people of this country might never permit this . . . to be . . . applicable to us, we may . . . expect, from the . . . conflicts of State regulations, that the citizens of each would . . . come to be . . . treated by the others in no better light . . . ”  

 

In Federalist No. 42, Madison said, “ . . . A very material [factual] object of this power was the relief of the States which import and export through other States, from the improper contributions levied on them by the latter.  Were these at liberty to regulate the trade between State and State . . . ways would be found out to load [burden] the articles of import and export, during the passage through their jurisdiction, with duties which would fall on the makers of the latter and consumers of the former . . .

 

The founders’ words in reference to the commerce clause plainly show the Constitution does not permit the federal government to impose commerce stifling regulations, with hundreds of lawless agencies and departments to enforce them.  This clause was included to encourage commerce, by prohibiting the states from imposing taxes on articles of commerce as they were transported through the state to their ultimate destination. The federal government’s abuse of this clause has done the exact opposite.

 

NECESSARY & PROPER CLAUSE

 

The third clause manipulated by oath breakers, the NECESSARY & PROPER CLAUSE, in no way authorizes Congress to pass any law it deems necessary to carry out whatever it wants to do. Article 1 section 8, last clause delegates to Congress power to pass all laws necessary and proper to execute its declared (enumerated) powers.

 

Federalist No. 33:  a power to do something must be a power to pass all laws necessary and proper for the execution of that [enumerated] power.

 

Federalist No. 33:  “the constitutional operation of the intended government would be precisely the same if [this clause] were entirely obliterated as if [it] were repeated in every article.”

 

Federalist No. 33: and thus the clause is “perfectly harmless” a tautology [needless repetition] or redundancy.

 

Federalist No. 33: The intent of this clause was to “guard against petty and unnecessary objections by those who might feel a disposition to curtail and evade the constitutional authority of the federal government”.

 

Again, what purpose is there for limited enumerated powers if Congress can pass law to do anything it deems “necessary and proper”? Interpreting it in this manner is traitorous.

 

 

 

 

NULLIFICATION

 

One of the Founding Principles in our Declaration of Independence is this: When government takes away our God given rights, We have the Right & the Duty to alter, abolish, or throw off such government. Nullification is the natural right of self-defense:

Thomas Jefferson said in his draft of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798:

“… but where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy: that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact, to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits”. “That without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them…” 6

James Madison commented on the above in his notes on Nullification (1834):

“… the right of nullification meant by Mr. Jefferson is the natural right, which all admit to be a remedy against insupportable oppression…” 7

Alexander Hamilton says in Federalist No. 28  (5th para from end):

“If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive [law abiding] forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success …” In other words, the peoples right of self-defense to strike down any government power not found in the constitution is paramount.

Hamilton then shows how The States can reign in a usurping federal government:

“…the State governments will, in all possible contingencies, afford complete security against invasions of the public liberty by the national authority…”

Federalist No. 33: A law, by the very meaning of the term, includes supremacy. It is a rule which those to whom it is prescribed are bound to observe. “If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard they have formed [i.e., the Constitution] and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution” as they deem wise.  We the people formed the Constitution.

Madison’s Report on the Virginia Resolutions (1799-1800), (which address the alien & sedition acts) states: “It appears to . . . be a plain principle, founded in common sense, illustrated by common practice, and essential to the nature of compacts; that where resort can be had to no tribunal superior to the authority of the parties, the parties themselves must be the rightful judges in the last resort, whether the bargain made, has been pursued or violated.

“…If the deliberate exercise, of dangerous power . . . withheld [forbidden] by the Constitution, could not justify the parties to it, in interposing [intervening] even so far as to arrest the progress of the evil, and thereby to preserve the Constitution itself as well as to provide for the safety of the parties to it; there would be an end to all relief from usurped power, and a direct subversion of the rights specified or recognized under all the State constitutions, as well as a plain denial of the fundamental principle on which our independence itself was declared.”

The Preamble to our Constitution shows that WE THE PEOPLE created the federal government. It is our “creature”. Alexander Hamilton says this in Federalist Paper No. 33 (5th para); and Thomas Jefferson, in his draft of The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 (8th Resolution). As our “creature”, it may lawfully do only what WE authorized it to do in our Constitution.

We created a “federal” government: An alliance of Sovereign States 3 associated in a “federation” with a national government to which is delegated supremacy over the States in few and defined areas only. James Madison, Federalist No. 45.

 

ENUMERATED POWERS

We delegated only “few and defined” powers to the federal government. These are the “enumerated powers” listed in the Constitution.

These enumerated powers concern:

? Military defense, international commerce & relations;

? Control of immigration and naturalization of new citizens;

? Creation of a uniform commercial system: Weights & measures, patents & copyrights, money based on gold & silver, bankruptcy laws, mail delivery & some road building; and

? With some of the Amendments, protect certain civil rights and voting rights (for blacks, women, citizens who don’t pay taxes, and citizens 18 years and older).

It is only with respect to the “enumerated powers” that the federal government has lawful authority over the Country at large!!!  All other powers are “reserved to the several States” and The People.

3. Our Constitution authorizes the federal government to secure our God-given Rights in the following ways: 5

It is to secure our rights to life and liberty by:

? Military defense (Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 11-16);

? Laws against piracy and other felonies committed on the high seas (Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 10);

? Protecting us from invasion (Art IV, Sec. 4);

? Prosecuting traitors (Art III, Sec. 3); and

? Restrictive immigration policies (Art. I, Sec. 9, cl. 1).

It is to secure our property rights by:

? Regulating trade & commerce so we can produce, sell & prosper (Art. I, Sec. 8, cl.3).

? Establishing uniform weights & measures and a money system based on gold & silver (Art I, Sec. 8, cl. 5) – inflation via paper currency & fractional reserve lending is theft!

? Punishing counterfeiters (Art I, Sec. 8, cl. 6);

? Making bankruptcy laws to permit the orderly dissolution or reorganization of debtors’ estates with fair treatment of creditors (Art I, Sec 8, cl. 4); and

? Issuing patents & copyrights to protect ownership of intellectual labors (Art I, Sec

8, cl 8).

It is to secure our right to liberty by:

? Laws against slavery (13th Amendment);

? Providing fair trials in federal courts (4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th Amendments); and

? Obeying the Constitution!

This is how our federal Constitution implements The Founding Principle that the purpose of government is to secure the rights God gave us.  Presently, it is destroying them at an unprecedented pace. 

 

CONSEQUENCES AND CLARIFICATION

A great evil now confronts Americans. In “The Law” Frederic Bastiat presciently explains:  “Law is now applied to annihilating the justice it is to maintain; to destroying rights that its real purpose is to respect.  It has converted plunder into a right and defense into a crime, in order to punish lawful defense”. Enlightened Americans, protesting these crimes are now be labeled “domestic extremist”. In this context, America’s pioneers, founders and revolutionaries are extremist.

 

 

“Nothing can be more necessary to understand than this:  Law is the organization of the right to lawful defense; it is the substitution of collective for individual forces to secure persons, liberties, and properties so as to cause justice to reign over all. Collective force cannot have any other end, or any other mission, than that of the isolated forces for which it is substituted. As the force of an individual cannot lawfully touch the person, the liberty, or the property of another individual - for the same reason, the common force cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, the liberty, or the property of individuals or of classes.  Who will dare say that force has been given to us, not to defend these, but to annihilate the rights of our brethren”?

 

Our forefathers worked diligently to create and ratify a limited central government with the primary goal of protecting Americans from foreign dangers and invasions. This was the main argument used by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, in “The Federalist Papers”, to convince skeptical colonist to approve the proposed Constitution.  The Papers specified the new government’s restricted authority and sought to alleviate the Peoples’ fears over the possibility of it subduing their liberties.  Ironically, today, the federal government now subdues  liberties by forcing law abiding American’s to capitulate to foreign invasions, and to lawless agencies and mandates that destroy commerce.  Consider the reaction of the People, if those authors of “The Federalist Papers” had argued for the establishment of today’s bribing pilfering government.

 

Annual federal spending is now approximately 5 trillion dollars according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).  Obligatory debt amounts to over 210 trillion.  To keep the US economy from collapsing, an illegal Federal Reserve must print money to prop up jobs, Wall Street, bonds, housing, paupers, foreign nations, and according to the BIS (bank of international settlements), insolvent banks exposed to over 1 quadrillion in derivative bets.

 

 

The BLS (Bureau of labor statistics) states that roughly 85 million jobs out of 137 million total reside in big government, health care, pharmacy, social services, education, building, law, insurance, and finance.  Manufacturing is approximately 8.5% of total jobs. Taxes, inflation, premiums, and the dollars’ world reserve currency status, enabling unprecedented money printing and debt, makes this upside down perversion possible. All pragmatic scholars agree that the dollars’ collapse is imminent. When this occurs, its status will be destroyed.  Dependent on this standing, confiscatory and intertwined job sectors will follow suit or be significantly marginalized.

  

CALL TO ACTION

 

Due to these alarming circumstances, we call upon citizens, officials and candidates to strike down federal government violations upon state sovereignty.  History is replete with examples of the tie between economic crisis and tyranny. Thus it is imperative that the states start to reclaim their reserved powers! Proper authority must be restored to protect citizens’ liberties. Turning a blind eye to the framers’ nullification remedy, especially at this critical time, is disgraceful. Doing so is nothing short of aiding and abetting the destruction of “liberty and justice for all”.

 

Our founding generation paid a terrible price in blood and treasure on the Peoples behalf. Their glorious legacy is in Our hands. If We fail to act responsibly, their blood will be on Our hands.

 

The framers bequeathed to Us the greatest governing document ever penned by man, along with the greatest nation in history.  Therefore, We must censor oath breaking leaders who dishonor them. 

 

True Americans no longer have faith in the federal government. For decades, the People have heard politicians on both sides rant and rave about change.  But the only change We The People get is more government control and less freedom.

 

Time is short. We must support the nullification campaign, Our last best hope to repel rising tyranny.  Apart from revolution or secession, there is no better solution.

 

Together, We can do it, but it will take effort, courage, and overcoming complacency. Have hope. The framers are on the Peoples side.  There’s no doubt they would not only agree with Our nullification plea, but insist We act. We solemnly ask you do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:33 | 6498793 AlfredNeumann
AlfredNeumann's picture

WASHINGTON, GEORGE, in Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co. "They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in... It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America."

This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a "CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION," at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina. "I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews. In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.

STYVESANT, PETER. 17th century Dutch governor in America. "The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with the Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves also for the general community of your worships, that the deceitful race -- such hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ -- not be allowed further to infect and trouble this new colony. (Letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company, from New Amsterdam, September 22, 1654.) The Jews whom he attempted to oust merely applied to their fellow Jews in Holland, and the order came back from the Company countermanding the expulsion. (For a similar situation during the Civil War, see ULYSSES GRANT). Among the reasons given by "their worships" for over-ruling their governor, one stands out rather glaringly, in view of the usual Jewish contention that their people were 'poor and persecuted:' " . . . and also because of the large amount of capital which they have invested in shares of this Company." (Harry Golden and Martin Rywell, THE JEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY) THE GEORGIA COLONY IN AMERICA. On January 5, 1734, the trustees ordered that three Jews who had been sending coreligionists into the colony without authorization "use their endeavors that the said Jews may be removed from the Colony of Georgia, as the best and only satisfaction that they can give to the Trustees for such an indignity offered to Gentlemen acting under His Majesty's Charter." (C. Jones, HISTORY OF SAVANNAH)

JEFFERSON, THOMAS. 18th century American statesman. "Dispersed as the Jews are, they still form one nation, foreign to the land they live in." (D. Boorstin, THE AMERICANS) "Those who labor in the earth are the Chosen People of God, if ever he had a chosen people." (NOTES ON VIRGINIA)

BEAMISH, HENRY H. 20th century British publisher. "There is no need to

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 03:00 | 6498661 luckylongshot
luckylongshot's picture

The stupid thing about the cycle of increasing centralisation of power that leads to tyranny is that it then leads to revolution and usually the decapitation of the narcissists responsible for the problem, making it an ultimately self destructive strategy for our "leaders".

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:34 | 6498732 NuYawkFrankie
NuYawkFrankie's picture

"Free Speech" USSA-Style:

 

1) If it's in accordance with the agenda of ZIO Bolshevism / Bankster Parasitism... Sing It Out Loud!

2) Anything else - if it's not explicitly Kosher-Nostra/MSM Certified - and you are likely, at the very least,  bordering on Thought Pre-Crime.  In accordance with "Call Us ... Before We Call On You! Guidelines - call (toll-free) the  DHS Helpline for your Mandatory Evaluation (1-800-OFF-TO-THE-GULAG)

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:17 | 6498739 BlackVoid
BlackVoid's picture

"The architects of the American police state must think we’re idiots."

The sad thing is that they are right.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:57 | 6498740 22winmag
22winmag's picture

The PC Police State snake has been eating it's tail and has run out of tail.

 

What's next?

 

Pop goes the snake. Poof, it's gone! Just like the scene wherein the man behind the curtain was laid bare in that movie involving a yellow (gold) brick road.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:42 | 6498753 redwater
redwater's picture

Say goodbye to liberty.

There's a neocon resurgence going on now.

They "Ron Paul'd" Rand already.

 

Trump and every neocon candidate is the nu-flavor again.

 

The same republicans who couldn't surrender their freedoms quick enough for George Bush to gut the constitution and privacy. Are once again clambering for the most totalitarian asshole, warmonger that can bluster into a microphone.

 

I wouldn't be suprised if Hilary gets a slap on the wrist, at the last second, regarding email-gate. Democrats complain now, but they'll fall in line, like they always do.

Republicans always fuck up, like they always do.

And it'll be Hilary: "The First Female President" of the United States.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 08:53 | 6499105 Sparkey
Sparkey's picture

Well, it is her turn!

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 04:41 | 6498754 iAmerican
iAmerican's picture

As a reflection of our subverted judiciary, the SCOTUS is now exclusively papists, false-Jew Talmud Khazars, and homosexuals: the consituency of "the real Anti-Christ" "engine for enslaving mankind" we fled in covenant with God to receive America, the actual foretold "Israel," true "Zion."

Smithian Capitalism, the basis of the "Annuit Coeptis" tenet yet enshrined on our credal civil religion's Great Seal of the Covenant of the People with our named Sovereign the Creator of the universe, is Mystical Union by society (viz. "Theory of Moral Sentiments") whereby all parties to every transaction must be cognizant of the presence and interest of the Deity, ruled only by Truth, Justice, Reason, and Honor as stipulated of the "New Israel" by the Hebrew prophet Isaiah - who also foretold Immanuel, God Incarnate, Who with tens of thousands of other "Christs," was crucified by the Khazar cult impaling "Christ killers" under contract for gold to the lictors and magistrates of the Roman law court whose present "Civil War"-making, Lincoln-assassinating, FedScam Vatican banker-intermediary Rothschild/Rockefeller-Bush/Clinton Organized Crime Fifth Column has again managed to elevate their satanic minions over the "El-ectorate," the "Chosen of God," the sovereign American People.

The Beast they and all pedophiles, rapists, murderers, and Zionists ride shall soon be cast down, praise God.

Death for Treason: Justice for John and Martin, and for our dead of Vietnam, Waco, OKC, 9/11, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:09 | 6498773 22winmag
22winmag's picture

Thank you sir.

 

May I have another?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:21 | 6498781 MSimon
MSimon's picture

I don't believe in collective guilt,  heritable guilt, or the corruption of blood.

 

Christ killers? The original Christ followers were Jews. And Jesus? Well he was a fan (with amendments) of the Torah.

 

The cognitive dissonance from loving Jesus and hating Jews has got to warp the brain.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:26 | 6498786 AlfredNeumann
AlfredNeumann's picture

The Buybull and Jesus are fairytales.  Biggest hoax in history

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 05:46 | 6498803 MSimon
MSimon's picture

I see we agree on something. I upvoted you.

 

OTOH you included "Christ Killers" in your rant. And Martin Luther. I think I'm going to change my vote.

 

Be consistient.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!