This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Is The Stock Market Now "Too Big to Fail"?

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,

Who knows what will trigger Fed intervention; that information is asymmetric, i.e. only known to Fed insiders.

Correspondent Bart D. recently speculated that the U.S. stock market was now "too big to fail," that is, that it was too integral to the global financial system and economy to be allowed to fail, i.e. decline 40+% as in previous bubble bursts.

The U.S. stock market is integral to the global financial system in two ways. Now that investment banks, pension funds, insurers and multitudes of 401K retirement plans are dependent on current equity valuations, a crash would impair virtually the entire spectrum of finance from hedge funds to banks to insurers to pension plans.

A decimation of these sectors would impact the U.S. economy and thus the global economy very negatively.

By turning the health of the economy into a reflection of the stock market, the Status Quo has made the stock market into the one bellwether that matters. In effect, the stock market is now integral to the economy as a measure of sentiment and evidence that all is well with the economy as a whole.

The stock market is now the signal everyone follows: if stocks are rising, we're told that means the economy is healthy. Conversely, if stocks decline sharply, the implication is the economy is weak.

In other words, it's not just valuations that make stocks integral to the economy and Status Quo--the market's signaling is now the key to sentiment. In economist Michael Spence's work, the information available to participants is asymmetric: roughly speaking, those on the "inside" have better information than those on the "outside."

The stock market addresses this asymmetry by signaling what's really going on via price: if the market sells off, that tells even those with little other information that all is not well in the economy.

A rising market sends the opposite signal: everything's going well. If the participant isn't experiencing good times himself, he will still defer to this signal, reckoning that his own financial stagnation is an anomaly rather than the norm.

This explains why a rising stock market is now essential to the Status Quo: if the market reverses, everyone who sees mostly stagnation in their corner of the economy will realize that is the norm, not a local aberration.

If the stock market is now too big to fail, the Federal Reserve will have to prop it up whatever the cost. Ultimately, this may require direct purchases of stocks--an action that other central banks are already pursuing.

This shouldn't surprise us. After all, the Fed directly bought $1.5 trillion in mortgages (mortgage backed securities) to prop up the housing market, and a few trillion dollars in Treasury bonds to push interest rates down.

Just as a speculative guess, perhaps the line in the sand that will trigger Fed intervention is an extension of previous tops in the S&P 500: a line that is support that the Fed cannot let become resistance.

Just as a parlor game, let's note that this line around 1,620 is about 100 points below the 200-week moving average at 1,711, which is about 200 points below the current level of 1,914.

Who knows what will trigger Fed intervention; that information is asymmetric, i.e. only known to Fed insiders. Perhaps a break below 1,711 will cause the Fed to ready its financial blitzkrieg.

A drop to 1,620 or so would represent a 23+% decline from all-time highs--a decent correction by historical standards, but one that--if reversed in short order--would not necessarily trigger a financial meltdown.

That cannot be said of a drop that erased 50+% of the SPX's current value. If the market is indeed now too big to fail, the Fed will be forced to take unprecedented action if the decline hurtles past correction to carnage and full-blown meltdown.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:29 | 6499223 Haus-Targaryen
Haus-Targaryen's picture

If the stock market is too big to fail, is it fair to still call it a "market?" 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:32 | 6499237 Headbanger
Headbanger's picture

Who's going to buy this shit?

And with what?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:34 | 6499245 VinceFostersGhost
VinceFostersGhost's picture

 

 

Gotta take either more of it.....or less of it......I'm not really sure which one - Jackson Browne, Cocaine

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:35 | 6499250 clooney_art
clooney_art's picture

Everything is too big to fail, until it fails under its own weight.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:39 | 6499265 VinceFostersGhost
VinceFostersGhost's picture

 

 

Everyone has a plan....until you get punched in the face - Mike Tyson

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:45 | 6499284 toady
toady's picture

Wait, what is this "NOW" TBTF stuff?  I'd been assuming everything finance related is TBTF  since '08!

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:56 | 6499314 SoilMyselfRotten
SoilMyselfRotten's picture

In effect, the stock market is now integral to the economy as a measure of sentiment and evidence that all is well with the economy as a (whole) hole, a big black one.

There, fixed.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:11 | 6499376 El Vaquero
El Vaquero's picture

Before China started selling USTs, the Fed could not have pulled QE4 off.  If China and other EMs start/continue to sell their UST holdings, then the Fed might be able to get away with a final QE, but it won't have the desired effect unless the primary dealers are the ones snapping up the foreign USTs, and they have to snap up enough to make QE viable.  Otherwise shadow banking gets fucked by QE4. 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:41 | 6499268 MalteseFalcon
MalteseFalcon's picture

China is not overly concerned with our stock market and they are setting the agenda.  The FED will be good for the occasional phoney rally all the way down.

Someone will have to convince China to care.  That might take a while.  Until then the patient bleeds out.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:50 | 6499295 Ghordius
Ghordius's picture

"Someone will have to convince China to care" ???

what exactly do you want China to do? manage your stock market?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:10 | 6499370 MalteseFalcon
MalteseFalcon's picture

I don't want anything.

But those who care about the US stock market will want to get China to stop doing things that hurt the US stock market. 

The FED and the US cannot override China's actions for long.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:16 | 6499410 BandGap
BandGap's picture

Mutual exclusivity on a number of fronts, from economic structure to basic culture. There is no way anyone should expect China to care about anyone but China. If they do anything that "helps" the US it is purely in serving their own interests.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:45 | 6499283 klayton biggs bee
klayton biggs bee's picture

By leaps and bounds.......Bitchez

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:45 | 6499281 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

The FED will buy it; unlimited ether dollars, Ctrl+P right into the binary database.

$1.00 Dollar becomes $1 Trillion in the blink of an eye; DOW 20,000.

And yes, their madness knows no bounds.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:38 | 6499506 Consuelo
Consuelo's picture

The same people who are shoveling the interest rate hike story, that's who.   You MOOK...

;-)

 

 

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:32 | 6499238 order66
order66's picture

If the stock market wants to crash, no one can stop it, not even the Fed + the usual group of crony countries. They will all go down with it if they try.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:41 | 6499270 cpnscarlet
cpnscarlet's picture

Technically, the stock markets can go to infinity while the dollar crashes to zero.

With the FED's success in supressing PMs over the last 4 years without a popular revolt somewhere in the world, I hold no hope of their control being broken in any market until some major catastrophe occurs...

OR China chooses to stop playing the game.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:01 | 6499341 mtl4
mtl4's picture

The gov't will fight hard to keep the status quo but due the fact the markets are all connected now, nobody has the choice not to play anymore.........issue will just be who's bonds go to zero first.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:03 | 6499346 moneybots
moneybots's picture

"With the FED's success in supressing PMs over the last 4 years without a popular revolt somewhere in the world..."

 

Gold went parabolic 4 years ago.  The math on parabolics is that 100% fail.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:13 | 6499383 BandGap
BandGap's picture

This was all by design and talked about years ago. This, despite the fact that not all Americans are invested in the market.

It's about control - the middle class chasing the brass ring of "retirement" and the FSA being placated sloths. Nice 1-2 punch.

Fuckers.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:28 | 6499224 RawPawg
RawPawg's picture

the bigger they are,the harder they fall...EVERYTIME

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:31 | 6499227 Son of Captain Nemo
Son of Captain Nemo's picture

Nope!

No... I'm pretty sure it isn't too "Big" at all!

Especially as long as there is a Rule 48!!!

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:29 | 6499228 TeamDepends
TeamDepends's picture

We'll find out in a minute. And we're off!

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:29 | 6499229 jump_mutha_fukah
jump_mutha_fukah's picture

Gonna fade this open on strength

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:31 | 6499235 Amateur Society
Amateur Society's picture

Hey guys! Anybody want to go in on a hedge fund where we recruit college kids, pump their egos about getting rich day trading, and use software that sells when they buy and buys when they sell? I figure since almost all traders blow up this is foolproof! If anyone is actually a good trader we'll let them go for not conforming to the "culture".

Looking for a name for the chop shop, any suggestions?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:58 | 6499330 Mr. Bones
Mr. Bones's picture

Fleece's

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:08 | 6499366 Uncertain T
Uncertain T's picture

Goldman Sachs is already taken

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:36 | 6499254 I woke up
I woke up's picture

The market is deemed critical to national security, they aren't going to let it tank without throwing everything they have it first. 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:37 | 6499258 khakuda
khakuda's picture

This just highlights the lunacy of the entire experiment.  The Fed decided to reflate all asset prices to create a wealth effect which would in theory make the real economy stronger.  Given that they have missed their GDP forecasts for growth each and every year since 2009, it clearly didn't work, but they won't admit it.  They were hoping the stronger economy would then validate higher asset prices in some type of fairytale fashion.

Now, they are screwed completely because they have created a huge disconnect between asset prices and the real economy which now poses a danger to the real economy if asset prices decline by any significant measure.  Carry trades implode, corporate earnings take a hit as the cost of funds rises, pension funding costs rise and the economy slows, etc, etc.

But, this is what happens when you follow the Krugman/Summers/Bernanke/Greenspan school of creating the next bubble to fix the economy from the last bubble.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 18:02 | 6501822 No More Bubbles
No More Bubbles's picture

"Now, they are screwed completely because they have created a huge disconnect between asset prices and the real economy which now poses a danger to the real economy if asset prices decline by any significant measure."

 

What do you mean "If asset prices decline"???  There is no IF.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:38 | 6499261 malek
malek's picture

It's a choice between letting the stock market fail i.e. crash, or support it with freshly minted fiat -
which will work for a while until the problems get so big the fiat currency fails.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:41 | 6499273 Bangin7GramRocks
Bangin7GramRocks's picture

YES PERIOD

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:46 | 6499282 VinceFostersGhost
VinceFostersGhost's picture

 

 

Never trust someone that says period....especially if he's the President of the United States.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:45 | 6499285 Salzburg1756
Salzburg1756's picture

1 or 2 quadrillion $ of ultimately worthless derivatives says you are wrong. There's no way around that other than war, internal and/or external. Some pipers will be paid, most will not.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:52 | 6499303 Ghordius
Ghordius's picture

except if we finally ban all the new derivatives. and there, China might start by banning stock market shorts. and wouldn't that be hilarious

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:50 | 6499298 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

you're just guessing the level set by the fed

If you're not inside, you're outside. [/Gordon Gekko]

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:52 | 6499300 DontWorry
DontWorry's picture

So don't worry! There are so many political and economic reasons that the market can't go down, so obviously it won't. Astute traders should welcome the increased volatility as an opportunity, having confidence that the economic fundamentals are strong and the fed had their back.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:54 | 6499311 aliki
aliki's picture

absolutely agree. the kenysians have forced everyone into the pool. exactly why all these brokerages are finally waking up to the fact of what this website (ZH) as well as its posters have been saying/believe from the get; that is NOT emergency measure, rather its new policy. market has always pulled back following a QE program; now that this last one has "ended" (pause before the refresh) we've gone from 215 on the SPY to 194. pension funds cannot sustain this with no viable alternative. with lackluster growth in the economy, dividends will be slashed overtime. ie. this new economy is predicated on eating itself. that is what debt eventually leads to. sugar high feels great at the time but the hangover is a bitch. longer the high, worse the recovery.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 09:59 | 6499334 moneybots
moneybots's picture

"By turning the health of the economy into a reflection of the stock market, the Status Quo has made the stock market into the one bellwether that matters. In effect, the stock market is now integral to the economy as a measure of sentiment and evidence that all is well with the economy as a whole."

 

No it isn't.  A new record 93.8 million people are not working.  The true unmemployment rate is higher than the phoney politically motivated official number.

Everyone knows there is something not right about the economy, with the FED rate at virtually ZERO.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:00 | 6499336 khnum
khnum's picture

its integral to the world financial system as a fucking cancer or parasite this consistent interferencewhen its a mere one percent down or a few pips off in any of the corrupted markets Wall Street runs is destroying global stockmarkets,commodities,curencies and ripping economies apart. 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:01 | 6499338 jakesdad
jakesdad's picture

"if stocks are rising, we're told that means the economy is healthy. Conversely, if stocks decline sharply, the implication is the economy is weak"

 

first half is true but not the second - when we have sharp declines we're told "economic fundamentals are strong so drop is irrational"

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:03 | 6499345 PrimalScream
PrimalScream's picture

The stock market will never really be "too big to fail".

Because in times of bear markets - people are dominated by FEAR.  Fear is an incredible motivator.  People will do anything to get their money out and try to preserve their life savings - if they think they can lose everything.  The problem is - the vast majority of people reach this conclusion far too late in the game.

Stock markets can always melt down.  Look at China for a wonderful example of INVESTOR FEAR in action.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:09 | 6499368 Dre4dwolf
Dre4dwolf's picture

Markets fail all the time.

Even when govts try and save them.

Especially when govts try and save them.

In-fact the more govt tries to save something, usually the more it self-destructs.

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:13 | 6499385 Thisisbullishright
Thisisbullishright's picture

This is what happens Larry....

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:16 | 6499411 Traianus Augustus
Traianus Augustus's picture

So it is DIFFERENT this time...

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:19 | 6499423 Not if_ But When
Not if_ But When's picture

Actually, a very simple answer:  A resounding YES!!!!

( don't overthink it )

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:21 | 6499447 q99x2
q99x2's picture

Stock market is being bought by the private bankers that own the FED. They are buying it with fresh fiat and charging the citizens of various nations for their purchases of the World's corporations. They are like pedophiles. They won't stop until they are locked up.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:27 | 6499473 MSimon
MSimon's picture

What do you call it when the governent owns the means of production?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:31 | 6499485 Seal
Seal's picture

Sounds like Schumpeterian 'creative destruction' has been destroyed

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:33 | 6499489 Kaniption
Kaniption's picture

You all realize that that "simple 300 point drop" puts us SIDEWAYS for the last 15 years.

-In effect we will just have wasted 15 years of our economic future

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:40 | 6499516 Consuelo
Consuelo's picture

 

 

Has not the stock market been proxy for positive public sentiment about the economy, and by extension, the lens through which the Fed takes $$$action, since 2008...?

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:40 | 6499518 Baby Eating Dingo22
Baby Eating Dingo22's picture

This is news?

This has been the case for at least 10 years

EVERY prez, particularly Bush and Obuma, touts a higher market as evidence of economic prosperity

And they do all they can to keep it afloat

It's a propaganda tool

Ask the Chinese. At least they admit it

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:47 | 6499553 DOGGONE
DOGGONE's picture

Long way down ...

http://www.showrealhist.com/

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:49 | 6499559 venturen
venturen's picture

You can still lose going all in! Ask any former super power

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 10:55 | 6499567 Grandad Grumps
Grandad Grumps's picture

Well, through increasing domestic value adding productivity and foreign labor arbitrage the amount of value adding jobs in this country has steadily declined.

Because we live in a money-slave state, a form of money accumulation is required for people to eat and have shelter. What are the choices?

1. Create value adding work for people to get money
2. Create non-value adding work for people to get money
3. Create money out of thin air, via banks or government and give it to people
4. Create other money creation mechanisms, such as equity appreciation
5. Decrease the need for money

The central planners of the money-slave state have either failed to create work or never intended to in the first place.

Money is being created out of thin air and given to non-workers.

Other money creation mechanisms have proven to only benefit those who already have access to excess money.

The only real choice left, if they plan to hold society together is to decrease the need for money. However, that puts the slave state in jeopardy and additional force is deemed to be required.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 12:29 | 6499987 RighteousDude
RighteousDude's picture

"....failed to create work or never intended to in the first place" .

Completely agree.  It was PLANNED to ship our jobs overseas by the banksters, so they could issue loans for factories, infrastructure, and import/export tranactions.

The banks paid off the politicians to look the other way....

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 12:33 | 6500012 theyjustcantstop
theyjustcantstop's picture

2008 was a death blow to america, for 100yrs the fed and it's owners, it's political cronies, and it's powerfully placed, highly paid employees,"ie hank Paulson" schemed, legislated, and waited for a 2008.

it wasn't just luck that in 2008 in one room, sitting at one table a handful of people knew how to fix Americas financial future, and then proceded to legally redistribute the assets of past generations of hard working americans, and the assets of all forseeable generations to come,at that table in 2008 those few tossed the constitution into the trash can, probably forever. 

since 2008 three's been no free, and open market, all there's been is crony unconstitutional legislation.

people laugh when there's comments that Americas turned into a third world country, but it's factual.

all that's happening now is making sure the govt. enough money to keep the ebt's working

to me it's almost laughable, people still trying to get rich in today's markets" the fed casino", what if you managed to make a few million, or even billion, what would you do?

how many millionaires, or billionaries do see out in public in 3rd world countries, enjoying themselves, and spending money?

another thing I find laughable these govt.agencies, and law-enforcement groups, having 100,000's of automatic fire-arms, and billions of rounds of ammunition.

lets just start with the basic 3rd world senerio, the atm's, and ebt's are shut-down, there will probably be 75% of Americas law-enforment that wo'nt even show up to work,

how many rounds of ammo will it take to stop 2,000,000 citizens living  in south, and west Chicago, heading northeast to claim what they been told was stolen from them by the rich, from our president, right down to the politician running for city council?

how many rounds would it take to keep the citizens of 3 bouroughs in nyc heading north to get whats been told was stolen from them?

there are 2-3 dozen more cities, same situation

all thier stock-piles, of guns,and ammo will be used or stolen from them to be used by others on them, within a week.

I don't see anything left in america tbtf, 2008 killed america, now the other countries are just waiting for america to have it's ruinous un-civil war.

 

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 14:12 | 6500635 Edward Morbius
Edward Morbius's picture

The "wealth effect". Make you and your cronies fabulously wealthy through ZIRP and QE and hope it trickles down into the economy. Or not.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 17:30 | 6501689 Midnight Rider
Midnight Rider's picture

The stock market historically has gone sideways to down for periods of a decade or more and the economy still grew during the period. In fact, it grew faster then than it has during this last Fed induced hyperbubble. Artificially inflating financial assets, most especially when you telegraph when you are going to do it, causes the greatest malinvestment of productive assets possible. Financialization through stock buybacks and all the other non-productive uses of captial causes funds that would have been driven into long term, broad, economy building activites to be diverted into pure speculation that only benefits a very small minority, and then only temporarily. Horrible economic policy that will result in another crash. It's only a matter of when.

Wed, 09/02/2015 - 18:00 | 6501815 No More Bubbles
No More Bubbles's picture

THERE IS NO STOCK MARKET!

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!