This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
West Point Professor Calls For Military Strikes On Journalists Critical Of War On Terror
Submittted by Cassius Methyl via TheAntiMedia.org,
An assistant professor from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point recently declared that professionals critical of the “War on Terror” constitute a “treasonous” opposition that should be subject to military force.
He believes the U.S. should have the right to attack people who are critical of U.S. military operations — specifically, professionals, legal scholars, journalists, and other people effectively spreading ideas that oppose war.
Professor William C. Bradford went as far as to publish a long academic paper in the National Security Law Journal that aggressively promotes suppressing dissent about military force, civilian casualties, and expanding military operations in the Middle East.
Using the excuse that victims would be “lawful targets,” Bradford argues that “law school facilities, scholars’ home offices and media outlets where they give interviews” should be targeted with military force to suppress dissent. He asserted that the war on terror should be expanded, “even if it means great destruction, innumerable enemy casualties, and civilian collateral damage.”
He further suggested that the U.S. should wage “total war” on “Islamism,” using “conventional and nuclear force and [psychological operations]” to “leave them prepared to coexist with the West or be utterly eradicated.”
He said that “Threatening Islamic holy sites might create deterrence, discredit Islamism, and falsify the assumption that decadence renders Western restraint inevitable.”
Despite his self-description as an “associate professor of law, national security and strategy,” a representative of the National Defense University has tried to distance the school from Bradford by saying he wasn’t part of the staff, but rather a contracted professor.
Sporting a long history of exaggeration and pro-military extremism, “He resigned from Indiana University’s law school in 2005 after his military record showed he had exaggerated his service,” according to The Guardian.
Though the man seems to be held in high esteem by the military, he spoke with such disregard for human rights that the National Security Law Journal had to apologize.
The NSLJ released a statement on the front page of its website, saying it “…made a mistake in publishing [the] highly controversial article…”
“The substance of Mr. Bradford’s article cannot fairly be considered apart from the egregious breach of professional decorum that it exhibits,” it admitted. “We cannot ‘unpublish’ it, of course, but we can and do acknowledge that the article was not presentable for publication when we published it, and that we therefore repudiate it with sincere apologies to our readers.”
Ironically, Bradford has a Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree from Harvard University with a focus in Human Rights Law.
This is a man who is apparently incorporating his violent philosophy into his teaching at West Point. He started on August 1st 2015 — after he published his article.
This is only the tip of the iceberg in forming a complete understanding of the ideological fabric held by many of the war hawks in U.S. Military.
»
- 46980 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
The only paradox I can see is an incredible inability by the US government to protect its own borders with Mexico but an almost manic desire to cross and violate every other border on the planet.
Unless it is allowing the entry of Mexicans for use as a future cannon fodder, I am at pains to understand their rationale.
With regard to that red herring, "immigration" --- those 15 Saudi hijackers on 9/11/01 were in America LEGALLY!
"trying to weaken it (America), degreade its morale and eventually subvert it to the point where the U.S. would be unable to defend itself."
Imagine... not invading Iraq- the counterbalance to Iran. Imagine keeping the fuck out of Syria. Imagine Lybia still controlled by ruthless dictator.
There would be no refugees invading Europe. The Islamists would continue to fight amongst themselves instead of the country that bombs them randomly from the air.
And tell me again that fairy tale about who actually is committing treason against America and her interests.
Think of Dante's 'Inferno', when the first nation attacks the United terrorist Snakes of izrHELL, the others will ALL join. The clock is ticking.
Ok... let's think about this for a second. I am anti American, but I'm not pro any other country. I just think the nation-state as a concept is a really bad idea. Does this make me a terrorist that ought to be shot?
So let me get this straight. If he could be sent in a time capsule back to the time of the Vietnam War he would subject journalists to military force back then as well?
Perhaps the only force that should be exercised isa retrospective abortion on his own mother.
This guy is typical for a guy who doesn't have to do the fighting. Send him off with all the ammo he can carry. Let him sally forth and do the ugly work up close and personal. Oooooh, that's right...hes a PROFESSOR, not a grunt. He can only THINK about these things.
Rather like all those economics profs who are sure QE is the way to go, or all those communist profs who teach that white people are bad and capitalism is wrong, or all those poli sci profs who are sure if we just have more welfare it'll all get better.
Seems to me, we are better off targeting professors of ALL kinds....
But not 'your professors', right?
Like those that follow Carl Menger, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, Friedrich von Wieser, Ludwig von Mises etc.?
Hey West Point Academy Asshole! Here's one "Critical" fact for ya.
The Criminal Fraud UNITED STATES, CORP. INC. arms, funds & trains the exact same terror oraganizations it claims to protect the American People from via Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia & Lybia which Bengazi was about.
You fucking worthless piece of Shit!
Muslim Demonization Hoaxes Matter:
http://winteractionables.com/?p=23020
The professor in question resigned from West Point.
Before this article was published.
Thank goodness. My only thought was why "resigned" when he should have been shown the door immediately.
even the most vile of "professors" are afforded the best protection possible. allowed to "resign" and move on with the least amount of taint. the university is protected by the release yet the professor is also allowed the best possible status of release. it's a club and they protect their own as best as possible. all major gov't and quasi-gov't institutions are as such. look at Hillary Clinton, vile, evil and yet still protected by the state as much as possible.
"Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree from Harvard University with a focus in Human Rights Law."
Harvard Law = there are No human rights nor laws nor constitution = so will say the Obama TPP Tribunal - there is only opportunity cost and lost profits as the criteria in determination of any decision.
Just another Crypto-libtard caught once again with their hand in the hypocrite cookie jar.
For a professor, he sounds like quite a dumbass. He should offer a bounty instead. It's inexpensive, and can be outsourced. It doesn't require deploying military assets, and all of the logistical and political bullshit that goes along with that. The dynamics change, and that would change the act from a government-backed assassination, to a criminal act. But, as any convicted murderer would tell you, the first one is expensive, the rest are free. Besides, life is cheap in developing nations.
Which god's prophet is he? From where cometh his dogma? Is a Harvard Law degree a credential or an indictment?
The sad thing is there are plenty of Merikuns who would say " Fuck yeah! Kill dem sum bithchez!" Murica! Fuck yeah!"
Yep! The greatest PsyOp forums are across the Bread & Circus stadiums & arenas across the country.
"Year after year, we watch as violence against nature and against each other becomes the staple of our pride and patriotism."
-Recently read, name forgotten
Sad state of affairs.
Guess what? They already do this shit. It's just done quietly, with soft techniques.
(cough, cough, Andrew Breitbart, cough cough)
The US military is a wonderful institution, but like anything it can be corrupted, or at least infiltrated by people who's belief systems run counter to the military's fine ethos. Call this guy out, make an example of him, and clean house.
-Argenta
Study well that which one wishes to destroy. Obama, for example, studied constitutional law.
Proof that it's a war of terror.
Looks like his pension fund is going to get vaporized.
Don't tell us how to think in a free world republic called the United States of America. You swore under oath to uphold Constitutional law.
Don't fuck with our laws. You will become released of military duties without pay. That's called a discharge.
This guy needs to quit waving his dick around and put it back in his pants before someone chops it off.
Yes, because evil's solution to everything is murder.
It is not possible to do good through evil acts.
Might be some grey area here. Would it be evil to off the world's banskters, their servants and muscle?
I think you would have to have faith to say yes.
"My greatest flaw. I surround myself with idiots."
- Victor von Doom
Thou shall first take every measure to defend thyself from evil. Once exhausted, thou shall proceed to eliminate evil.
With regards to the Banksters, while we still use their currency and willingly suffer their usury, we empower them.
Yes, it would be evil to off the world's banksters, their servants and muscle.
Yes, I do have faith.
I do not subscribe to the belief that "evil will always triumph because good is dumb". At the very lowest level evil can disrupt good for a time. But good has never gone away, just as there always seems to be evil in this world.
Good cannot be drawn into the antics of the children who are overwhelmed by fear and ego.
Great News!...
We don't need the likes of pfc Manning anymore to leak videos of the wanton murder of a bunch of innocent civilians and journalists anymore!!!
This is one where I might actually contact my congressional representative for his removal, not that it would mean much, but it could be a good exercise.
It don't matter what you just did. The signing by Mr. President on December 31, 2011 that he said he didn't want to sign changed all that!
Maybe he's a Christian and the mass murder in Syria has caused him to snap. He cleary should have been edited and not allowed to publish in a West Point associated journal, and probably needs to get some help. But I support the idea of moving towards Proportional War with the part of Islam that is waging total war with the West and Christianity.
So...you're saying you want to shoot Obama?
"My greatest flaw. I surround myself with idiots."
- Victor von Doom
I bet this guy goes first pick in McCain's fantasy draft!
Yeah, Kissinger must be looking to hire an assistant again. Everybody look busy!
It case you don't know, you will appear in front of a JAGs court.
Apparently the only treasonous persons in the US are those in Government that keep pointing out how everyone else is committing treachery. Ironically these fucking douchebags have never read or given close scrutiny to their oath of allegiance and they forget that they are servants to the public, not their masters. Unfortunately this opinion of supremacy is reinforced by the lack of public will to check these motherfuckers.
Bradford is a Fucking Moron and a Shill.
Using the excuse that victims would be “lawful targets,” Bradford argues that “law school facilities, scholars’ home offices and media outlets where they give interviews” should be targeted with military force to suppress dissent. He asserted that the war on terror should be expanded, “even if it means great destruction, innumerable enemy casualties, and civilian collateral damage.”
Bradford is mentally ill.
he's a NWO Neo-Con Poster Boy
Demons at West Point.
You are rebuked in the blood of Jesus Christ.
This dickhead is now spreading his bullshit at West Point. Combined with genetic re-engineering and robotics, we, the People are fucked.
What a nutter !
Fine then. Send him to the Ost Front then.
Beware of those who like to spend other people's blood.
He is an 'assistant professor' for a reason. Yeah lets just start lobbing nukes around. Get on chill pills for hypomania pronto fella.
Conflict is part of our evolution be it verbal or physical. Wisdom is when to apply it and at what scale.
Or we could just cut funding to West Point and the bloated MIC and just fuck him off as we rebuild this country from 50 years of wastefull spending and worthless fiat.
Read the paper. See you at the camps.
..."he wasn’t part of the staff, but rather a contracted professor"...
You mean he had to purchase his own insurance?
WHAT A NUTCASE!!! THIS NUTCASES RULE THE WORLD.
Herr Goering, Goebbels, Herr Hitler and Herr Netanyahu commend you .
The National Security Law Journal just happened to let this ... slip by??
The National Security Law Journal does not vet authors or review submittals?? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
They let this degenerate spiel through because they wanted to gauge the response.
We are being probed.
I used to hate being probed..........
Empire is dirty business. It attracts people already like this, and creates them too. This Bradford guy just showed up a little too soon. The US already does all this stuff, but to this point we pretend otherwise. Shelling the hotel in Baghdad where Al-Jazeera was headquartered was an intentional war crime. That's just the example I can think of off the top of my head, but the US military is well-known globally for killing journalists. It's clearly an element of US strategy.
That isn't really very surprising. Every Empire eventually resorts to open brutality. Look at what the French did in Algeria and Vietnam. The British almost everywhere they went. You can go all the way back to the Romans, and further back still. No Empire has ever outnumbered those they have conquered, so all Empires have to use terror, murder, torture, and destruction.
Normal human beings can't brutalize other human beings and remain normal and functional. So abnormal human beings are required. Abnormal human beings can't build or maintain anything worth keeping, so Empires all fall eventually. But not until the monsters have done so many monstrous things to so many people that enough people lose their fear of death and rise up to throw out the Bradfords of the Empire.
This guy just opened his mouth a few years before our cultural mythologies had changed enough to accept the reality of Empire and how Empires operate.
And, by the way, there are very few options remaining to save the US. All of them begin with slicing a 0 off the war-machine budget. Without a 90% reduction in spending on Empire, and a 100% reduction in spending keeping insolvent crony speculators pretending to be solvent, the USA will collapse sooner rather than later. But the Bradfords of the Empire will make sure there is a bloodbath before final collapse.
In large, complex societies, the abnormal can thrive rather than being eliminated or at least marginalized as would happen in a smaller communnity setting. And, in thriving long enough, their madness spreads until the society pulls itself apart. History repeats for sure.
Always gratifying to know the world is not populated completely with fuckwitts. Good post swmnguy.
"My greatest flaw. I surround myself with idiots."
- Victor von Doom
Thank you. At the very least, I try to confine my own innate fuckwittery to areas of little importance.
Yes, Great Post.
I love this point you made.
"Normal human beings can't brutalize other human beings and remain normal and functional. So abnormal human beings are required. Abnormal human beings can't build or maintain anything worth keeping, so Empires all fall eventually.
I remember the shelling of the Hotel the journalists were in too. And a lot of other things. (Made for TV Statue coming down etc).
You point about
"This guy just opened his mouth a few years before our cultural mythologies had changed enough to accept the reality of Empire and how Empires operate."
I hope everyone can Grokk that in fullness and it's implications. Yes, Very inciteful and profound.
Good on you Sir...
Get a 'Chris Kyle'' trained expert to take him out from 1500 yds.
Uh...they're on the same team.
Punk ass bank stooge for war profiteers. There, did I slam everyone?
Yeah, he's dangerous. Great job reviewing articles before you publish them, National Security Law Journal, if that's your real name.
I do think there's going to be a lot of friction within and between Islam and everyone else for many years to come. They wouldn't be as pissed if we'd get our boots off their necks, but the whole go-out-in-a-blaze-of-glory-for-Allah thing is appealing to every guy who comes to discover he's no big whip, think Tamerlan Tsarnaev.
US gov is the biggest terrorist organization on the planet. Stop supporting Israel and we won't hear a peep from te Middle East. Great idea giving jew fucks a country and funding their expansion for last 50 years.
you are the fucks who need to be tortured for the rest of your pitiful existence. you are now one of the first 10 people I will visit when the revolution begins. Get ready you rat fuck.
Make sure General Allen is at the top of the list. The son of a bitch who supports ISIS while saying they are fighting them.
Actually a few well placed nukes on Israel, and the Middle East will have peace.
Um sir, your narrative is showing, might want to tuck it back in where it can't be seen by the public.....now back to that gooky lady in Kentucky and Cops vs People on the local news.
He resigned from WP earlier this week after being exposed for dbag asshattery. The end.
Give him a rifle. Send him to Afghanistan. Problem solved.
From the abstract - "[law professor dissidents claim that] Islamist jihadis a response to valid grievances against U.S. foreign policy, that civilian casualties and Abu Ghraib prove the injustice of the U.S. cause, that military action is an aggressive over-reaction, and that the U.S. is engaged in war crimes that breed terrorists, threaten the rule-of-law, and make us less safe."
I'd say the dissidents are right and William C. Bradford is the one who's "against evidence and reason" (also from the abstract).
Seems to me VP Agnew would have agreed with the professor. Silence dissent. At least the criminal Agnew tried to do it through intimidation. This asshole wanted to codify it in law and force of arms.
Ah, Spriro Agnew, You mean Cheney 1.0
Military members should be cautious of consequence when proposing the use of military force (a.k.a. "making war") upon the population who are engaged in Constitutional Free Speach.
There is no qualifying language in the First Amendment prohibition against Federal Government infringement of speech. Perhaps someone can infringe, but the Federal Government and its employees cannot. And the use of War Power to overthrow that Constitutional prohibition is the precise specified constitutional definition of Treason.
Would I be right in assuming that he is not a complete idiot?.
Some bits could actually be missing?.
ON the contrary, I'm sure he's very bright. He's a psychopath. The market is booming in psychopathy right now, but our cultural myths haven't quite caught up yet. Though, as the US political campaign season starts to heat up, it's quite clear to see that psychopathy is being heavily promoted. There doesn't need to be a majority of psychopaths for Empire to take the next step. Just a small number in the right places can create a critical mass.
This guy, like many psychopaths, lacks the ability to comprehend that many people find psychopathy abhorrent. So while probably extremely intelligent, he doesn't understand that he needs to keep his mouth shut and mimic the normal people until he gains enough power to bring his horrifying desires into reality. Eventually, the needs of Empire will require it. But Bradford went off prematurely, so he will be shuffled off. The really cunning and dangerous psychopaths are still there, making note of Bradford's indiscretion and learning from it.
Bradford's cavalier position on civilian collateral damage is most disturbing, obviously keeping company with the like minded.
Oxytocin deprivation from birth aside, WTF makes an alleged human being behave this way other than ritual abuse induced psychopathy?
It would be nice to see some of this "outrage" get redirected to actual (not theoretical) drone murders, special force execution squads, and military occupations.
Sir, we shall not go to war
We shall bow down to Allah first.
OK
So you haven't been warned have you?
Watch Europe now.
bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran
Inciting murder is a crime and such a dangerous nutter should be immediately locked up.
Just like Farrakhan. O, wait, that's just free speech, my bad.
I am pretty sure the only reason such people can teach and be is because they did not seen the war with their own eyes. He teach from behind a warm class in the school and think he smart. Send him to Gaza and force him to see how forbidden phosphor slowly kill civilians and he will panic. Or show him massacred kids in the village of Syria. Point a gun at him and he will scat right where he stand. I bet when it come to his own life he would be a coward full of shit, but when judging other lives hes all wisdom. Stupid fool.
Like a poster said - if he's so gungho give him an m-16 and ship him to the front for a little attitude adjustment.
He might want to do his next paper on fragging and the many ways it's carried out first
Herr Hitler was just 2 generation too soon - imagine what he could accomplish with all the technology available now and the dumbfuckery of the general population.
O, wait..................
Hang that man from a lightpost. Offer a crypto bounty. Somebody call the police and arrest that traitor.
Kill list inductee..... for sure
Kill list inductee..... for sure
I think Bradford writes for the Onion.
Also Mad magazine.
assistant professor = unemployed
Someone tell Francis to lighten up.
Welcome to Extraordinary Rendition Airlines Professor Bradford, please take your seat next to Dr. Bernanke.
To those who think our military would never fire on civilians. Guess again. Power corrupts....so when an 18 year old punk puts on a uniform and is handed a rifle, he becomes powerful. This isn't your grandpa's military anymore. Yes, I'm generalizing, but I think there are more service members who would fire on us if given the order than we realize, especially given all of their war-on-terror neocon brainwashing.
You could very well be right. Things in the US are starting to resemble post-Versailles Germany. Lunatics running for highest office, overemphasis on moral superiority, fascist economy, entrenched oligarchy & dwindling freedoms, just to name a few. Instead of persecuting Jews, it could be "illegal" immigrants. Scary to think.
Pleased to meet you, hope guessed my name. I'm running for Perz.
Good to see you again, MH. However, there are older vets who know how to set up an ambush. An 18-yr. old will lose against a combat vet. Trust me.
I want to disagree with you Meat, but sadly I cannot. While I used to have the utmost respect for the military, I fear that they have become as corrupt as the politicians that give them their marching orders.
From the paper:
“Thus, for America to be chastised for violations of law, or worse, branded a rogue and anomic regime, threatens the fundament of U.S. legitimacy. Because the United States, like other democratic republics, requires public support to muster, deploy, and sustain military operations, and because allegations of law of armed conflict (LOAC) violations lodged against the U.S. strike at the legitimacy of a nation constituted by the rule of law and unwilling to prosecute ?illegal wars, these claims directly assault American political will.48 It matters not that Islamists repudiate all obligations to observe LOAC; what is necessary is that the U.S. will to fight them withers under allegations of American lawlessness. This is precisely why Islamist strategists have orchestrated a two-dimensioned operational plan consisting of an information element—a PSYOP campaign— supported by a military element—the unlawful use of armed force—to convince Americans that the United States is an evil regime that elected to fight an illegal war against Islam, that the United States systematically commits violations of law in prosecuting this war, that U.S. crimes erode national security and destroy core values, and that the only way the United States can restore its moral virtue, recommit to the rule of law, and protect itself, is to withdraw in defeat.” - THE CRITICAL LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT ACADEMY AS AN ISLAMIST FIFTH COLUMN, by William C. Bradford.
Apparently, good and moral governments embrace: indefinite detention, murdering suspects, spying on their citizens, domestic propaganda, civil forfeiture, starting revolutions, hijacking free markets and price discovery by QE, TBTF, TBTJ, Obummercare, etc…
Restoring our moral virtue, rule of law, and international respect will require a lot more than withdrawing and whitewashing the lies (Iraq WMD, they hate us for our freedoms /s, etc…) that got us into this mess.
It is not too late for peace.
ZH commenters are exempt right?
/sarc off
The Constitution you swore an oath to defend when taking your post has amendments ratified by the US Congress within that guarantee my right to call you and the government out on the inconstitutionality of your actions for precisely this reason you priveleged white tower piece of ignorant pondscum.
When you make anyone critical of your bullshit a 'lawful target', you immediately and forever abandon any semblance of the rule of law.
I really hope this guy steps in front of a fast bus tomorrow.
Define professor...someone who thinks that he is smarter than everyone else...Thank you Professor Bradford for your insights...they are very helpful for the world we live in...You my friend should be nominated for the Nobel Prize for stupidity...
Don't be so mad, this guy is only trying to follow in the footsteps of Wesley Clark who has advocated similar assaults on the constitution and the American people. I seriously doubt that this guys views are an anomaly at West Point or anywhere else in the upper escelons of the military establishment, the problem with Bradford is that he overtly reveals the the general treasonous attitudes of the establishment to the public when one in his position is likely expected to shine that turd up a tad for propaganda purposes.
This goes way beyond Wesley and his war mongering generalizations (or his war crimes against untermenschen in Europe), or HUAC and its Red Scare witchunts and actual imprisonments of the 50's.
He is suggesting the are (at least) 40 specific targets in US academic institutions today that should be assassinated, and collateral damage (innocent US citizens and property) is both justified and acceptable.
Those aren't birds in the campus trees...
They're mini-drones.
Not as bad. Wesly was going to use a tactical nuke in Bosnia. He was fortunately overruled by a British general who had some sense.
He didn't even need to do that- simply firing on the Russian troops at the airport could have started World War 3. But targeting untermenschen civilians and infrastructure, and making the dumbest (or most psychotic) military miscalculation in human history is at least intellectually defensible/arguable, unlike targeting innocent exceptional ubermenschen civilians, or thinking that Wesley would even be an acceptable President or Demontard Presidential Nominee.
Agreed. I have seen a few different theories on the McCarthy era events here but haven't looked into it yet, it seems obvious that something squirrely was going on. The thing that should bother us the most is that it takes a complete admission by the guilty party for the majority of Americans to realize what is going on, anything short of admission doesn't suffice as reality. Where would we be if the wolves didn't slip up and announce themselves and admit that they are on the hunt?
Some in the military and various other goverment offices are hell-bent on bringing these wars to our soil. They are nothing less than psychopathic mass murderers.
Psychopaths don't know they are psychopaths. Obomber, Bush Clinton and 99 percent of Congress are psychopaths.
The worst ones are the ones who say they are ''Christian''.
Fuck the USA bullies and warmongers.
Right attitude wrong agenda, he has the right strategy for halting illegal immigration http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/west-point-william-b...
And those that promote it with state assets.
Islam is a symptom of criminal invasion.
A Jamie Gorelick appointee
If Trump were in office he would never stand for this.
Fuck this guy. If he can't handle criticism and doesn't have the ability to deal with it, he has no place anywhere near a platoon. The cocksucker swore an oath to a document that he probably has never read and certainly doesn't understand.
Yeah, no shit. Is shit-for-brains who they hire over there???
Well, he could always fill the next opening at Pyongyang Law School.
Jesus H. Fucking Christ! Wait until he finds out some of us don't go to church.
All these cocksuckers in the Pentagon like to think they are 'Christers''. and then have the gall to criticize Islamists.
America makes Nazi Germany look like choir boys.
This means moral superiority of the cause against a squishy target that can be modified to fit the situation – used as a battering ram to get whatever Mr. Global wants.
Remember – the 2013 NDAA reauthorization repealed the Smith-Mundt act, thereby sanctioning US domestic propaganda (easier now that the MSM is owned by 6 companies) http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/
If you haven't - might want to thumb through The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations: Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political, and Economic Decline of The United States of America http://thinkorbebeaten.com/Library/T/Tavistock%20Institute%20of%20Human%20Relations.pdf
LOL! Stupid goyim kvetching. “Critical on war on terror” really means ‘exposing international kosher organized crime’. Goyim never learn. We run it all. Make you believe anything. Soon we put goyim in prison if say earth not flat. Hahaha! Oy vey!!!
Soros: Valerie, the economy sucks. We gotta get a war going. Get your boy to attack something, anything!
VJ: OK, Gerogie, calm down! We'll bomb Diego Garcia and say the Chicoms did it!
my asshat professor gave me c- on polysci midterm, where do i submit his info????
TO ALL THE ZH CROWD: DON'T YOU DARE TO BE CRITICAL ABOUT THE WAR ON TERROR,
BE FURIOUS INSTEAD, SO YOU WON'T BE DRONED.
WE GOT TO DO WHAT THE MAN SAYS, RIGHT?
Don't drone me, Bro!
Has West Point itself become this treasonous?
Yea, everything is fucking inverted. Patriots are now terrorists, credit now substitutes for savings, the pope is a socialist, and government funding of wasteful nonsensical projects is considered "sustainable".
So........terrists are Patriots? Got it.
"Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out."
I'd say this fella has a bright career ahead of him in the Pentagon. Apparently he learned a few things about human rights at school.
He don't like them.
Star pupil, no doubt. Sounds like this guy is off his rocker like the general in Dr Strangelove!
Bill Hicks said it best:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDrgwZsGC9A
I think if we quit fucking with them, they may leave us alone. If not, then it's on like Donkey Kong vs. the Muslims. Doing business is better, but if they try spreading Jihad, that is a different bag of chips.
But, hey, they already knock off reporters.
And so what, Me a veteran disagrees with a lot of our policies??? Fuck this Toad.
So the US has jihadists too, of its own ilk. No surprise, everyone's got their own brand of nutbag. Having them in a teaching position though, that's a tad sketchy
So the benghazi incident is now a case study....
Well... not as one would have expected... but its a case study for sure!
West Point Professor, that says it all.
I would say he is more of an ass kissing faculty idiot than really serious about what he's saying.
Send him to UC Berkeley and watch this turd dance to a different beat.
Professor William C. Bradford appernetly did not study the U.S. Constitution in all of his academic years. What we have here, is a Tyrant.
I'll bet he studied the Constitution thoroughly.
He don't like that either.
I've read through this paper. This reads like it came out of the Likud Party.
Perhaps it did.
I'm not being glib:
Does Jewish Law Justify Killing Civilians?
This article is part 10 of LoonWatch’s Understanding Jihad Series. Please read my “disclaimer”, which explains my intentions behind writing this article: The Understanding Jihad Series: Is Islam More Likely Than Other Religions to Encourage Violence?
Islamophobes like Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller claim that Islam is more violent than other religions, particularly Judaism and Christianity. To prove this, they argue that the Islamic holy book, the Islamic prophet, and the Islamic God are all uniquely violent–certainly more so than their Judeo-Christian counterparts.
We proved these claims completely bunk by showing the Bible to be far more violent than the Quran, the Biblical prophets to be far more violent than the Prophet Muhammad, and Yahweh of the Bible to be far more violent than Allah of the Quran. (See parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-i, 6-ii, 6-iii, 6-iv, 7, 8, 9-i, and 9-ii of LoonWatch’s Understanding Jihad Series.)
Instead of defending their initial claim (which they simply cannot), the Islamophobes quickly shift gears and rely on a fallback argument: they argue that “the Bible doesn’t actively exhort its believers to commit acts of violence, unlike the Quran.” I refuted this argument in part 6 (see 6-i, 6-ii, 6-iii, 6-iv) in an article entitled The Bible’s Prescriptive, Open-Ended, and Universal Commandments to Wage Holy War and Enslave Infidels.
Once that argument goes to the wayside the Islamophobes then jump to their next fall back argument: “most Jews and Christians don’t take the Bible literally like Muslims do the Quran!” I refuted this argument in part 7, showing that they do in fact understand the Bible very, very literally.
In a very predictable pattern, once this argument fails, the Islamophobes rely on yet another fall back argument, the famous cop-out “But That’s Just the Old Testament!”. I’ve refuted this argument in part 8.
Once this fall back argument is refuted, Islamophobes once again do not defend it. Instead, they move on to the next fall back argument: they argue that “Jews and Christians simply don’t interpret their holy book in a violent manner, unlike Muslims.” Writes Robert Spencer on p.31 of his book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades):
When modern-day Jews and Christians read their Bibles, they simply don’t interpret the passages cited as exhorting them to violent action against unbelievers. This is due to the influence of centuries of interpretive traditions that have moved away from literalism regarding these passages. But in Islam, there is no comparable interpretive tradition. The jihad passages in the Qur’an are anything but a dead letter.
This is Spencer’s preemptive parry to any counterattack whenever anyone (like myself) responds to his cherry-picking of Quranic verses by reciprocating and finding similar (and even worse) passages in the Bible. We are told that modern-day Jews and Christians simply don’t take those passages seriously any more, that they are merely symbolic or that they are dead letters.
Spencer et al. will then take a break from copying-and-pasting Quranic passages, and instead focus on “classical opinions” in the Islamic tradition, which they claim continue to be to this day the “orthodox, mainstream opinions according to the four schools of Islamic jurisprudence [madhaib].” By contrast, argues Spencer, classical and modern-day orthodox, mainstream interpretations of Judaism and Christianity have moved away from literal understandings of the Bible and opted for non-violent, peaceful understandings.
However, I will prove that this is not the case at all. The violent verses in the Bible helped formulate the “classical opinions” of the Judeo-Christian tradition, and continue to be held by “mainstream, orthodox” groups today. In this article, we will examine the Jewish rabbinical tradition (both the “classical” and modern day situation); in a later article, we will grapple with the Christian side of things.
...
http://www.loonwatch.com/2011/10/does-jewish-law-justify-killing-civilians/
The Top Five Ways Jewish Law Justifies Killing Civilians; #1: Civilians Are Really Combatants
http://www.loonwatch.com/2011/10/the-top-five-ways-jewish-law-justifies-...
The entire corpus of international law and the law of war stands in opposition to every hackneyed premised in this sophomoric paper by someone who sold their soul to the Ziopaths.
Woe unto you, poor Jerusalem:
http://www.ahavat-israel.com/eretz/future
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=western_support_for_islam...
Yup.
I always keep an eye open for those head-chopping Methodists in the neighborhood when they're not shooting Catholics and selling their daughters into slavery.
what about religious Jews who burn kids to death?
How about them, stupid?
Almost as bad as those baby eating Episcopalians.
They sell the bones to the Congregationalists for soup.
Nice try but jewish law is not israeli law. Israel is not a theocracy.
Is everyone waking up to the bullS**t that is the 'war on terror', is that it ?
I wouldn't mind them taking out the Fox News propaganda machine. I'd call them treasonous because of their radical disinformation.
I wonder what Michael Hastings would have thought.
Does this fella have an address?
c/o 1600 Penn Ave Washington DC NW
I am for bombing Mosques. Not the rest of the stuff. But of course our goverment will not bomb Isis, becuase they created them.
The politicians are the only treasonous people in America.
Sounds like the ideas behind a dictatorship to me.Adoph Hitler comes to mind along with the historical evidence of what the United States has done to overthrow democratically elected governments in South America and the Middeleast.Coo-coo for Coco-Puffs,world domination quackery is rampant in neo-con (neo-nazi) circles in Washington.Get Victoria Nuland out to speak at West Point right now!We need to continue to bust the budget,to hell with Detroit.
The guy is 1) Army 2) a lawyer and 3) went to Harvard. Why would anyone pay attention to him or give a shit about his paper - except other Ivory Tower dumb fuks wiring other drivel. Come up with a ridiculous thesis and I bet there is a Harvard paper supporting it somewhere