This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The BLS Just "Revised" Away One Full Month Of Job Gains For Year Ending March 2015
As if there was not enough negative data for the Fed to contend with, and make the case for a rate hike delay already, moments ago the BLS released the preliminary estimate of its "annual benchmark revision to the establishment survey employment series" for the 12 month period ended March 2015. While the final report will not be released until February 5, 2016, with the publication of the January 2016 Employment Situation news release, today's release will give the Fed yet another reason for concern as the BLS just admitted that at least 208K total jobs (and 255K private jobs) were overestimated in the year ending March 2015.
This is equivalent to eliminating nearly one full month of job gains in the specified 12 month period, and spread across the various months, would have meant a constant series of NFP headline misses instead of consensus beats, likely leading to a far more adverse algo kneejerk reaction on the first Friday of every month.
From the BLS:
Each year, the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey employment estimates are benchmarked to comprehensive counts of employment for the month of March. These counts are derived from state unemployment insurance (UI) tax records that nearly all employers are required to file. For National CES employment series, the annual benchmark revisions over the last 10 years have averaged plus or minus three-tenths of one percent of total nonfarm employment. The preliminary estimate of the benchmark revision indicates a downward adjustment to March 2015 total nonfarm employment of -208,000 (-0.1 percent).
Preliminary benchmark revisions are calculated only for the month of March 2015 for the major industry sectors in table 1. The existing employment series are not updated with the release of the preliminary benchmark estimate. The data for all CES series will be updated when the final benchmark revision is issued.
Table 1 shows the March 2015 preliminary benchmark revisions by major industry sector. As is typically the case, many of the individual industry series show larger percentage revisions than the total nonfarm series, primarily because statistical sampling error is greater at more detailed levels than at an aggregated level.
And here is the latest quandary for the Fed which mercifully will be able to ignore this latest confirmation the economy has been slowing down substantially in the past year, well above what the various other economic indicators have already suggested.
- 11338 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -



Oh, that rate increase is SO on now.
A+ for the Bureau of Lies & Subterfuge (BLS)
Maybe they should just get the numbers right before they report them.
They just realized a rate hike might impact gov spending and their jobs, so a revision was in order. "Now FRB please do not raise rates".
I'm gonna file this in my, "Things that don't surprise me anymore…and I wish they did" File.
whooopsy
You mean they <gulp!> lied?
Well it did work.. for a while.
"When things get serious" and all that.
Immigrants are doing quite well, native-born American Whites, not so good.
The TPP, TiSA:
FOIA request confirms presence of immigration chapter in Obamatrade
OBAMA TO ADMIT 100,000 REFUGEES INTO USA
CENSUS: Foreign-Born Incomes Increase, Native-Born Incomes Decline
Overall income down 6.5% since start of recession
Immigrant Population Hits Record 42.1 Million
BLS: Bunch a' Lying Scumbags
Or "Bureau of Lies and Sugarcoating"...
That sounds like a headline that won't play under this administration.
They might mention the revisions in construction and government though.
Only .gov is capable of overestimating a number they make up.
It's quite a skill. Notice that .gov employment is up. They needed more people to make the lies
I'm stealing that phrase.
HP,,, another 30,000 gone.
A friend went to Yellowstone Park,,, said most working their were foreigners.We can't cook and wait tables any longer? Talk about!
I mean,,, what does everyone expect. 100% employment of all foreign nationals?
For 60 years I have watched this country go to shit,,, now everyone wonders why?
Does anyone invest based on those numbers any more, or do people invest based on their guess as the the algos' reactions to the headlines? Invest like one might do at the local racino, when you invest in penny slot machines.
They do it for the children (of obama).
where did all those construction jobs come from?
Holy shit. Depending on how you apportioned that it could mean that every jobs report for 6-8 months missed. What a joke