This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Iran's Ayatollah Trolls US "Zionist Custody"
Yesterday during the presidential debate, hyper-conservative Ann Coulter unleashed a major tweet storm which touched quite a few nerves due to its anti-Israel/zionist overtones, and has been extensively covered in the press this morning. Here are her more notable tweets:
How many f---ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
Cruz, Huckabee Rubio all mentioned ISRAEL in their response to: "What will AMERICA look like after you are president."
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
Maybe it's to suck up to the Evangelicals.
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
Based on Census, another 300 immigrants entered the country during debate (33 per second) to vote against the GOP candidates' tax &war plans
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
Christie also talks @ Israel in response to the question: What will AMERICA look like after you are president?
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
How to get applause from GOP donors: 1) Pledge to start a war 2) Talk about job creators 3) Denounce abortion 4) Cite Reagan 5) Cite Israel.
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
I like the Jews, I like fetuses, I like Reagan. Didn't need to hear applause lines about them all night. https://t.co/4guFehK0CM
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
It's not about Jewish people; it's about Republican panderers. https://t.co/OmOL2B9K0E
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
Her tweets appear to have touched a nerve not only domestically, but abroad as well with Iran's supreme leader Khamenei who, after being the topic of many mispronounced rants last night, decided to follow up moments ago with his own "anti-Zionist" tweetstorm:
US govs put their people under Zionists custody.Isn’t it a shame that presidential candidates try to satisfy Zionists&prove their servitude?
— Khamenei.ir (@khamenei_ir) September 17, 2015
Zionist regime is an imposed regime, made through coercion; no entity made by coercion would last. This regime will not survive either.11/13
— Khamenei.ir (@khamenei_ir) September 17, 2015
Will this confluence of hyper conservative views and Iranian fundamentalism complicate Obama's efforts to open Iran up to western financial interests? Hardly. After all money always walks.
»
- 23241 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Fuck Israel and it's Satanic infestation!
Joe Biden - "I am a Zionist"
http://youtu.be/Uo-UXZ-1ups
Israel just lost the UK to Corbyn. I never thought I would see that in my lifetime.
At least Israel owns all the U.S. presidential candidates on either side that matter. Someone correct me if I'm wrong - I'm trying to ignore the election. I think they already threw Hillary under the bus though. Unusual to say the least. And now Bibi is on his way to Russia for permission to take more Syrian and Lebanese land? I'm guessing that isn't going to go well.
Sad days when you get more truth out of Iran and Russia than the west....
Anne Coulter just got kinda hot! Even the Jews must be sick if the Jews by now....Blankfein is afraid of Trump on the nuclear button, I am afraid of Blankfein and Goldman Sachs, go figure.
i'd still hit it, only with the eye patch.
I Fucked Ann Coulter in the Ass, Hard
This won't be good for Ann's career, or will it? Is the general public aware enough that stating the truth is rewarded? My respect for Ann has just tripled. Now if Trump would show the same chutzpah!
Khameini: This regime will not survive either.11/13
Didn't a line like this get used once before to insinuate the wiping of Israel off the map? Rather surprised it hasn't been siezed on again, yet.
Yeah, that horse face is HAWT!
Love her first Tweet.
Same thing I ask myself whenever a new head of the FED is announced.
pods
"Anne Coulter just got kinda hot!"
Sure, if you ignore the adam's apple.
Checking out Bloomturd confirms that Carly is the new Banker's Bitch...and she will do WHATEVER it takes to get elected...
She's a Harpy.
No doubt Carly will do anything to get elected. So wil the rest of the pandering douche bags I saw last night.
This sums it up perfectly....click for a little 'elected' fun from Alice Cooper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i4EnjRKVQw
Israel just lost the UK to Corbyn.
-------------------------------------------------------
Really? The whole UK? [/s]
Let's see how many elections the new & improved Labor party actually wins with loony Corbyn at the helm.
And, by the way, if Israel "owns" the US, then explain the Iran deal and the fact that the US lets in over 250K Muslims a year.
I'm sure you think that the Jews want to be swamped demographically. They are soooo crafty.
Funny that you think the Iran deal is going to stop war with Iran...
Here you go in answer to the question of why the Jewish leaders would like to have immigration. I'm sure you won't agree but you asked. As to your question of how Israel lost on the Iran deal when they "own" the US, that's easy: When people say Israel "owns" the US, it's not 100% control of foreign policy, maybe just 90%, or something like that. (I bolded the word leaders since people like you might be against open immigration, even though you're presumably Jewish.)
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/understandji-1.htm
The idea that any sort of exclusionary thinking on the part of Americans—and especially European Americans as a majority group—leads inexorably to a Holocaust for Jews is not the only reason why Jewish organizations still favor mass immigration. I have identified two others as well: the belief that greater diversity makes Jews safer and an intense sense of historical grievance against the traditional peoples and culture of the United States and Europe.28 These two sentiments also illustrate Jewish moral particularism because they fail to consider the ethnic interests of other peoples in thinking about immigration policy. Recently the “diversity-as-safety” argument was made by Leonard S. Glickman, president and CEO of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, a Jewish group that has advocated open immigration to the United States for over a century.
Fun Fact: Dual citizenship was illegal in the US until 1967 when SCOTUS ruled in favor of an individual (a communist named Beys Afroyim), who was denied a US passport after voting in an Israeli election. 1967 was a banner year for the Zionist assaults on US liberty and the USS Liberty.
Details of Afroyim v Rusk
http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_456
Yep, led by one of the most famous and powerful Jews in America, Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas. He was rejected when nominated to be Chief Justice, and later forced to resign under public pressure, but the damage had been done. Who can deny how this dual citizen cancer has spread within the government in the past 48 years? Who can suggest this is a good thing for America?
Now, we have Chuck Schumer next in line as Democratic Senate Leader when Harry Reid leaves next year.
"Dual citizen" is a phrase you NEVER hear on TV or in the mainstream press, but is one of the most important issues we face. No man can serve 2 masters. If you don't grasp that concept, go ask your wife to explain it to you.
There were more stories in the Jewish press on Jewish opposition to Scottish independence than there were to stories about the movement per se.
The fucking arrogance - in country after country, to agitate against the interest of the majority because you're a Jew first.
Well - then fuck off to Israel.
Why are you in Alba anyway if Israel is your homeland??
Jews won't be "swamped demographically" as they already are a tiny minority. The dilution of the whites remain their major goal. The whites of Europe have proven themselves to be dangerous adversaries to their goals in the past. They cannot afford to be kicked out of a major Western nation in this day and age.
Should that happen....As the late Edgar Steele said;" next time they better have a new planet picked out".
I wonder how soon Coulter will be apologizing and grovelling as she finds many income streams cut off?
You're obviously very confused. Europe has gotten a lot more dangerous for the Jews as the percentage of Muslims have risen. Not so much in the US yet, but the atmosphere is getting increasingly ugly on college campuses for similar reasons. In the end, massive Muslim immigration is short term suicidal for the Jews and long term suicidal for Christians.
Methinks many of the more rabid anti-semities on the site have real names of either Fritz or Mohammed.
They are not a tiny minority in the Congress, the MIC, Wall Street, Federal Reserve, Media, and on Corporate boards throughout industry.
Part of Jewish culture is that they value scholarship. Not a lot of Jewish dropouts.
Yep, no denying that they are industrious. Other parts include taking care of their own and working in a dedicated way to control and dominate, to cheat and take advantage of goyim. The more pious they are, the truer this is. In no way is it healthy for any country to allow dual citizens to have positions at the highest levels of policy and decision making.
You doubt that?
"And, by the way, if Israel "owns" the US, then explain the Iran deal and the fact that the US lets in over 250K Muslims a year"
You don't understand the program, 'Whatever happens is what they want to happen" don't try and understand what is happening, this has nothing to do with your, or mine, understanding, all you have to know is; The Jews are the chosen people, Who ever curses Israel will be cursed, whoever praises Israel will be blessed, that is all you need to know..
Pepeat these phrases 100 times a day and you may win the lottery! Not a bad deal, right?
I respectfully disagree... and sadly this is where a lot of Christians get it wrong...
The Bible is pretty clear that the Old covenant with the NATION of Israel has been replaced by the new covenant with the SPIRITUAL Israel, which includes all those who believe in the true Messiah, Jesus Christ, be they jew or gentile.
Why many Christian "leaders" continue talk about some sort of special dispensation for the NATION of Israel is beyond me - it has no basis whatsoever in the Bible. John 14:6 is pretty clear "I (Jesus) am the way, the truth and the life, no man comes to the Father but by me". I guess they are either bad theologians or closet Zionists.
the bible is a compendium of batshit crazy nonsense.
grow up.
The same can be said for all religions, but that does not change the fact that most humans bow down to some form of spirituality.
What you believe is your reality.
11b40 - "The same can be said ..." get out more. Open your eyes. Look around. Look outside the box you were placed in.
Although I don't agree with you, I stand by your right to voice your opinion. And that is one of the many reasons I like this place... one of the few remaining bastions of truth & expression (that I know of)
I continue to learn so much from the majority of articles and opinions shared... "like on sharpens iron"
BTW I am spiritual not religious - there is a difference. And I am especially no fan of organized religion, hence my comment above about many/most so-called Christian leaders.
Organized religion has been co-opted as much as, if not not more than, most political entities, for nefarious purposes
With all due respect, that make absolutely no fucking sense.
What I was essentially trying to say is that when Bibi stands before God on Judgement Day, saying "but I was citizen of the nation of Israel!" ain't gonna cut it. Faith, namely belief in the atoning work of Christ will be the ONLY thing that will save him, you or me...
"But their minds were blinded. For until this day the same veil remains unlifted in the reading of the Old Testament, because the veil is taken away in Christ. But even to this day, when Moses is read, a veil lies their heart. Nevertheless when one turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away" - 2 Corinthians 3:14-16
Don't mind me, I'm just a voice in the wilderness...
Reading your posts, leaves me asking what's with the Tao in taoJones? I think you mislabeled yourself.
Good eye CB... and since you asked :)
I joined this place a few years ago, courtesy of M.Maloney & T.Ferguson, but soon figured, why hand out there, why not go right to the source. At the time I was a naive, retail investor, and as one who liked the movie Trading Places (Aaron Russo RIP), hence my avatar, I thought a lighthearted play on words was in order, and pronounced the same way. Although, by the grace of God, I am a Christian, I still consider myself a student of other teachings, philosophies, etc. which is why I'm here. The intellectual jousting & sparring here is well worth the price of admission. My worldview has been shaped considerably by ZH, and I find a kinship with many here. As for Taoism, what little I know of it, is not at odds with my faith
True enough, but what amuses me about you Reformed types is that you're never quite sure whether you've made it or not. Even though the Book around which your devotionals revolve says:
"These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life," - I John 3:13a
Not find out on Judgment Day whether you might or might not have it, according to whatever vague and capricious standard the Lord is going to deem good enough. But know that you have eternal life now. Present tense. In the sense that, you're more sure that you have eternal life than you're sure that the sun is coming up in the morning. That's what the text says.
.
"...Really? The whole UK? [/s] Let's see how many elections the new & improved Labor party actually wins with loony Corbyn at the helm..."
They don't have to win any. The fact that Labor elected a pro-Palestinian, non-Israeli suck-up in a country where the press and most of the bribe machinery is owned by Israel-freindly interests is astounding. Compare that with the 'diverse' views on Israel among the serious U.S. presidential candidates.
"...And, by the way, if Israel "owns" the US, then explain the Iran deal and the fact that the US lets in over 250K Muslims a year..."
Corporate America owns the immigration policy - Israel has nothing to do with it. And like NeoRandian said above, the Iran deal has nothing to do with the planned war with Iran. In fact, it will be the excuse.
"...I'm sure you think that the Jews want to be swamped demographically. They are soooo crafty..."
Jews?? I'm talking about the psychpathic neo-con Israeli government. Religion has nothing to do with this except in the minds of bigots. But I'll have to agree with what freecheesex said above - lots of liberal Jewish leaders in the U.S. are pretty outspoken in their support of immigration policies - without regard to religion, AFIK. Psychopaths like Sheldon Adelson might have different ideas, but I don't consider him either Jewish or human. He's got money, nothing else.
The UK has a pro Israeli press? Gee, must have missed that. Among major news outlets, the BBC is the #2 apologist for Palestinian terrorism. Only Aljazeera tops 'em.
funny how Palestinians resisting Israeli occupation in their own land is "terror" but not Israel dropping white phosphorus or flechette shells on fleeing civilians in Gaza or the West Bank, eh?
fuck you.
rbg81 - you are obviously the only one upvoting your wounded comments. Stop before you get hairy palms and go blind.
Here's tribeswoman Barbara Spectre, explaining why Sweden and Western Europe has got to go the way of the buffalo. Its Barbara's self-appointed job, her and her NGO, to ram multiculturalism down their throats. What a hypocrite! Go try that schtick in Israel and see how far you get.
Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for destruction of Christian European ethnic societies. YouTube.
"and the fact that the US lets in over 250K Muslims a year"
how many Muslims are there in Israel? As it goes with humans its not their numbers its what you do with (and to) them.
If you think the Israeli and the US Govt elites are going to hold on to their pathetic, fictional, violent, hypocritical and ever solitary control games in that region, you're in for a surprise. But history tends to change doesn't it?
Between 20% to 25% of Israel's population are Arab Muslims. So you are not only racist but stupid as well.
In 1947, 70% of Palestine was Muslim. The fact that Muslims are only 20-25% of the population today speaks for itself about the Israeli agenda.
you misread my post so I won't comment on your second point
Tell us about the immigration policies for Jews in Gaza, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Yemen, Eqypt, Morrocco, Libya, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Indonesia, Syria, and other muslim-dominated countries.
You mean now, or before the state of Israel was imposed on the Middle East?
I mean right now
Also, why aren't the muslim nations lining up and begging to take in the islamic refugees? Israel is taking the Jews. Why won't the muslim nations welcome the muslims? There should be no "humanitarian crisis" of muslims teeming over the borders into the EU.
Israel is taking the Jews.
And farming them back out again as dual-citizens.
If Israel is only taking in Jews, why are Jews at the forefront of pushing your multiculturalism into the Europe and N. America?
UK was never Jew friendly. At least not on the level of the USA.
They are pretty comfy in The City.
pods
If that's the case the Rothschilds did a bang up job in making things worse by funding WW1 and assisting in the rise of Bolshevism. By the way, does anyone know if any of the Rothschilds ever served in combat? They are experts in funding wars, it only stands to reason that they would subject themselves to the same dangers as their neighbors' husbands, sons, and brothers, doesn't it.
Corbyn is Labour Party leader for five minutes. Labour as far as I'm aware still has its Labour Friends of Israel lobby group, as do the Conservatives have theirs. More importantly, the Conservatives will be in office, barring a long week in politics, or "events dear boy, events", for almost the next five years.
As to Corbyn and Labour, he has a hell of a hill to climb, especially as the establishment and media are gunning for him, to win over the middle ground of the people. Can he do it? I don't know, I somehow doubt it. He seems an honest decent man, a rarity in politics, but seldom a recipe for political success. I don't see that the great mass of British people have abandoned the deceptive lure of neo liberal economics just yet.
"...As to Corbyn and Labour, he has a hell of a hill to climb, especially as the establishment and media are gunning for him, to win over the middle ground of the people..."
Which was kind of why I was surprised by his win at all. Did they fail to demonize him enough or did the people just ignore the establishment and media this time? Protest vote of sorts, or were there just no other candidates worth bothering to support? The interesting part (to me) is that the plebes didn't do as told/expected. That's not a slam on the UK - I come from the land of the eternal sheeple slumber.
From this side of the pond (and the lens of the U.S. MSM), Corbyn's election seems unusual and rare. Just when you think the UK is drop-dead predictable and boring, it shows up with a funny hat. I'm not sure whether to simply be amused by the sight, ignore it out of politeness and avoid eye contact, run away screaming in terror or just attack the thing and stab it in the neck.
the last left wing Labour Party candidate Tony Benn was interviewed on radio: the secret service warned him, if he should be voted to Prime Minister he would be asassinated!
Corbyn has similar views....lets see how long he lasts
Alaric, here's some more Biden admission, from Oct. 22, 2001... http://www.newrepublic.com/article/politics/rhetorical-question
In the wake of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, Biden did, in fact, champion an anti-terrorism bill similar to the one now before Congress (though it was, as he complains, badly watered down by anti-government conservatives and leftist civil libertarians). And Biden doesn't let you forget it. "I introduced the terrorism bill in '94 that had a lot of these things in it," he bragged to NBC's Tim Russert on September 30. When I spent the day with him later that week, Biden mentioned the legislation to me, and to several other reporters he encountered, no fewer than seven times. "When I was chairman in '94 I introduced a major antiterrorism bill--back then," he says in the morning, flashing a knowing grin and pausing for effect. (Never mind that he's gotten the year wrong.) Back in his office later that afternoon, he brings it up yet again. "I drafted a terrorism bill after the Oklahoma City bombing. And the bill John Ashcroft sent up was my bill." You don't say.
-----------
Sooo, a leftist is the biggest violator of civil liberties, in US history. Imagine that.
Funny how both the "conservatives" and the "liberals" have now consumed and crapped out most of the Bill of Rights.
At least those pretending to be
while living in DC
Paging Hasbara ... priority deployment to ZH.
Rock the Hasbara!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ9r8LMU9bQ
pods
Current mani-fester-ation of the USSA is a global laughing stock/hate magnet.
For very very very good reason...
Truth be told, Iran too, will cease to exist in 25 years.
So I've got that going for me, which is nice.
warmonger turd
Please cite where you think he advocated war in his comment. Illiterate idiot turd.
Israeli will ultimately cease to exist as a Jewish majority state through demographic shifts in favor of Arabs, no military attack is needed. The downfall of this colonial state created in the 1940s through mass importation of Europeans is inevitable. Iran, with a population of 77 million and thousands of years of culture, would only cease to exist as a result of a massive war and nuclear attack (the ramifications of which would unravel the whole world). So what exactly do you think he is impling if not to suggest that he wants Iran to obliterated by war?
Yes - Iran has helped the Lebanese and the Palestinian people resist the state terrorism of a bunch of European Jews with a penchant for violence and tendency to megalomania.
Fuck you, and your fellow moonbat ziopaths.
Well, if we just rebuild our military and kick some ass, you'll all have to like us again.
kick yourself and your kind
"Fuck Israel and it's Satanic infestation!"
Ahh, iow, you stand with the rape children, rape, murder and maim women, anti-freedom ayatollahs. Only morons blame Jews for all the world's ills.
The Ayatollahs have not spread their cancerous usry throughout the world, corrupting everything it touches. This has caused far more misery and human suffering than all the Ayatollahs combined. How many World Wars have the Ayatollahs financed?
Not that I give a rat's patootie about an Ayatollah, or Allah, for that matter, but the real damage to America is coming from Zionists, and America is my primary interest.
I would never have guessed he was a ZH reader.
At least he correctly comprehends those that have 'Murica by the balls...
Zion or bust!
He is Banking Guy From Tehran.
My first ever first...
Ayatollah seems like a guy you can smaoke a J with over some beers and tell war stories about fucking hoes throughout the years...
Yeah, but eat one fucking piece of bacon.....
Jacob Joseph "Jack" Lew, Secretary of the United States Treasury, says, "Don't bogart that menorah, dude."
Cheesepopes FTW!
#JustACoincidenceTheyHappenToOccupyHighLevelBankingPositions
pods
Barry is flooding the country with Muslims now so it will interesting. The nation used to be called a "melting pot" but many of these extreme religious groups do not want to change one millimeter. Europe will see how this works out with their 5 million MENA aliens; the tail will soon be wagging the dog.
His name was Francis Sawyer
Francis made rational discussion of the crimes of Zionism impossible. With him it was all about how the Jews made his grandmother eat cat food and how they are watering down the beer.
Weak kneed appologist. Why are you spewing the zino line. Site some example to explain your position in the dog pile.
The type of thing that got FS in trouble was putting up lists of who owned what in Hollywood.
Priceless!!! :D :D :D
.
Chabad would deemed a hate orgnaization if they weren't Jews - Sacred and Eternal Victims who are above Criticism from mere Goyim.
It is presently the law that it is unconstitutional for a nativity scene to be displayed by itself on public grounds...
but not so the menorah - in NY, due to the chell game of Jeiwsh identity, it was deemed a 'civic' holiday {in truth many or most Jeiwsh Holidays are bizarre, nationalist orgies celebrating revenge, or some military victory - compare and contrast with what Catholics or Orthodox deem a 'religious holiday'.
Who will sue to stop Chabad from their Jewish Supremacist rite this winter?
No one, right?
Because it would be "anti-Semitic" to apply the law Christians are subject to, to the poor, holy, unique Jews.
He is right
and She is partly right
Wow, truth hurts...
I used to despise Ann Coulter because she's a crazy bitch, after her tweets I may have to re-think that position......, nope still despise her.
Broken clocks and all that, Doc...
Just don't ask a Mulsim kid to fix your clock because terrorism.
Is it me or does Ann seem just a bit bitchy?
She mustn't be getting any.
She must partee with Megan Smelly on Faux News
Who woulda thunk..
Bearded wonders with twitter accounts, and that bitch Ann Coulter, obviously bored with her supersized necocon dildo and ready to destroy the world again.
What is the 11/13 reference in that last tweet?
Since everyone here likes to take numbers/dates and assign doom to them, I'm gonna go ahead and say he's hinting at the date when SHTF.
I was wondering that myself. It reminded me of the Economists cover that had those arrows at the bottom right hand side. I believe one of them had 11/13 on them?
never mind, 11.3 and 11.5
http://winteractionables.com/?p=25207
Dude seems to be preaching to the choir here.
Ann Coulter said that?.....Wow. Zionists have really gone too far to get her upset at Jwes. Glad this story is finally getting some oxygen.
Well it has been the Republican strategy to get campaign financing by pandering to Jews even as they create the conditions that will lead to Israel's ultimate destruction. Are the Jews really dumb enough to believe that the Republicans are on their side?
"the Republican strategy to get campaign financing by pandering to Jews "
really? Since when did that happen, because jews have basically always sided with the Nazi leftards in this country. And sorry if you dont comprehend that, but that makes you the buffoon nobody else.
History shifts. It happened last election cycle....ask Newt Gingrich & Sheldon Adelson.
The Ayatollah is on point. He doesn't sound any crazier than those debating.
Who invited Al Jazeera into my living room?
Somewhat interesting story about Al Jazeera America...
My parents, in their upper 60's, had been thoroughly brainwashed by Fox News, and I had given up on any sort of halfway intelligent political, state of affairs, etc. discourse with them.
Then, over the holidays last year, I watched the nightly news on Al Jazeera America in their house, and their heads nearly exploded.
They seemed to have a tough time digesting the idea of an evening news program that actually delivered objective news rather than opinions and human interest stories.
"Huh.. this is what network news used to be like in the U.S. about 30 years ago."
"Yeah, mom. I know. Give it a shot."
They've been Al Jazeera America viewers since.
Al Jazeera America is the censored, tailored-for-the-U.S. version of regular Al Jazeera. Comcast, AT&T and the other cable providers initially refused to broadcast the 'regular' Al Jazeera so they made a U.S.-based (and U.S. censored... er, edited... version). And Al Jazeera itself was created to promote Qatari and the Gulf State's interests. It's like RT is to Russia or CNN is to Israel. So unbiased, no. But still miles beyond the stenographers we get in the U.S. and at least a somewhat different viewpoint.
That said, my parents (in their 80's) stumbled on to it on cable a few years ago and are big fans. No great political or philosophical reasons and they have no idea about the Qatari ownership. They are ambivalent about whether U.S. media is heavily manipulated or not - for the most part, they probably trust it. They just think network news in the U.S. is repetitive, boring and the reporting generally sucks. Al Jazeera America is just better and more interesting to them.
Where AlJazeera sucks is when they start talking about Syria., because their owners want a piece of Syria. Which, as PaveWay has astutely pointed out, they won't get anyways, because Israel needs to move that Leviathan offshore gas into Europe.
Two really excellent interviews about the Syrian situation broadcast a few hours ago on Australian ABC Lateline, they are well worth watching (video and full transcript):
Interview: Dr Bouthaina Shaaban, President Assad's key advisor
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2015/s4314916.htm
Interview: David Kilcullen
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2015/s4314918.htm
Clearly Oz views the whole Syria/Russia /Iran/Western situation entirely differently to how Washington is still talking about it.
Thank for the information. The seond interview reminds me of Vietnam reporting of battles where usa journalists would report 100-200 Vietnamese killed and only 2-3 American soldiers.
Don't like her but I agree that all the pandering is sickening. That she is just realizing this is what make me dislike her even more.
must.....please....our Khazar.....MASTERS....
Sincerely,
The Government of The United States
When ever one hears the word "Israel'' (support of) come out of the mouth of a candidate, regardless of which side of the aisle they are on, it's an automatic given they are a whore, slut, ass licking puppet. Cross out the name and move on. It's that simple.
And Chris "9/11" Christie thinks like Giuliani that if he does some more fear mongering he'll be dandy. All of them but for Rand talk about "killing" people in their rhetoric like it's as simple as giving candy to a child.
The thing I find crazy, is they all have a deep desire kill Middle Easterners, Russians, and Chinese by the millions, yet they all pretend to give a fuck about all life. I guess after you leave the shelter of the pussy, it's open season.
Is there even one military veteran in the bunch? There certainly isn't a combat vet.
Lindsey Graham is National Guard Lawyer who loves to put on the uniform and visit military bases, but heaven forbid he set foot outside the wire.
Everyone a chicken hawk running around like Chicken Little.
https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=chicken+little+the+sky+is+falling&...
Props to the Colt for truthing this, yo.
The shoe fits.
Never expect a Jew to join the army to defend the country but expect the government to send American boys to defend and die for Israel.
If Iran attacks Israel then Jesus will be very mad at America. It is all written in the bible. You just have to get really drunk and read Revelations while you asphyxiate yourself. Then you'll understand.
Ugh, I find myself agreeing with Assahola Kuminme and Ann Cunter!
Tyler has ruined my day.
it just the detox.. you will feel so much better later
No, my views are unchanged, and certainly not by those two. I just rarely connect with media where I have to hear from either of them.
Could care less either way about Coulter but would respect her more if she used her platform to state what really needs to be stated:
INCARCERATE ALL Federally elected officials that are members of AIPAC.
IMMEDIATELY cut off ALL aid to Israel.
Start saying things that have actual impact then maybe I'll take a gander. this is like those cutesie "well, ummm, maybe aww shucks we should do an audit of the Fed" rants.
I honestly thought Coulter was a paid up Neocon cock-sucking traitor, but I'm shocked she had the balls to say it how it is. Cue the behind the scenes arm twisting and career threats Coulter will undoubtedly recieve, followed by a swift clarification of what she really meant. Followed by her proclaiming "unwavering support for the state of Israel" blah de blah de blah blah blah blah.
Yeah, I get you, but the 2 issues are mutually exclusive.
She's got balls, yes.
And, she's still a paid up Neocon cock-sucking traitor.
Yeah you can only get paid to lie long enough, then you can't depress the morals with the drugs and alcohol anymore. Ann Coutler is pro-life, and she's finally realizing that the liberal, Jew-led GOPe simply is not, and has been lying to everyone for decades. A lot more conservatives are going to be dropping their support of the Jews over this. 7 of 9 SCOTUS justices are appointed by Republicans. Republicans control house and senate by landslides. But they don't even want to pick a fight over abortion.
Conservative Christians are finally waking up to the fact that the Jew-led GOPe is just another variety of Marxism, just one that speaks the language of the evangelicals to get their support to continue the exact same policies as the left. The only difference is that the left takes the middle-class' money and gives it to the FSA while the GOPe takes the middle-class' money and gives it to the banksters.
There are two ways to win democratic elections, either promise goodies to the poor masses (the left) or use bankster money to befuddle enough people that it is right and moral to give all the money to banksters (the right). This is the formula the banksters have used for centuries, and the elite win no matter who is elected, which is the purpose of hedge funds after all - you profit no matter which side wins elections.
Coulter thought "Gee, I care about morals so I'll support the Right not the crazy Left." And now she is finally understanding that the Right cares about morals just as little as the Left, but the Right just pretends to care as a marketing tool.
This is the awakening, folks. You really can't fool all the people all the time. National Socialism and a second (first?) holocaust is coming to America.
#There are two ways to win democratic elections,...
DieBold ... the third way.
"When ever one hears the word "Israel'' (support of) come out of the mouth of a candidate, regardless of which side of the aisle they are on, it's an automatic given they are a whore, slut, ass licking puppet. Cross out the name and move on. It's that simple. "
And that they despise you and will feed you and your children to rabid dogs to please their masters. Spot on.
"My greatest flaw. I surround myself with idiots."
- Victor von Doom
I knew the Ayatollah was a ZH reader
Why wouldn't he? He has about 100 agents working this damned site at any given time. I love it when they start arguing with Asswads agents or the Puttrolls here to shine up anything and everything Russia. Pretty funny...
And what about you? How's the matza balls in Tel Aviv?
Iran's supreme leader Khamenei for President! Well, maybe Trumps VP. And maybe Coulter could be ambassador to Tel Aviv..."no more entitlements, fuckers".
By the way...
If you actually listened/read the speeches of the Iranian leaders (including Ahmadinejead), 99% of the time they never said Jews... only Zionists.
They remember the fact that the Zionists destroyed the former caliphate (Ottoman Empire) so that Rothschild could get Palestine and subjugate the Arabs into colonial nation states that eventually emerged from the broken empire.
90% of Jews today arent blood Jews, but followers of Talmudic Judaism. And if you look in places like Syria and Iran, Jews lived relatively in peace, especially if they didnt dabble in local politics in these Muslim/Arab countries.
Words matter... and why Ashkenazi propaganda has been so powerful in rope-a-doping opinions for the faux Christian cabal, and those who have a limited understanding of the English language and meanings.
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain (It's time to toss the dice)
The Daily Economist
Islamic faith does not support Usury. Hence the perpetual propaganda war mongering against Islamic nations by the Zio-Khazarian, countefeit FRN printing, cocksucking, criminal FED Bankster Cabal.
>Islamic faith does not support Usury.
Neither did Christianity until the Jews tricked Luther into turning half of Christianity into a mongrelized Judaism...
First time I have seen this truth stated so succinctly. Thank you
Bullshit. If you knew anything about Sharia finance you would know that the fees to transact are outrageous AKA usury.
If you really think Islamic finance functions in a way whereby nobody makes money on a transactional basis, I have a swamp on the moon for sale -- better hurry though because its getting bid up as we speak...
Read up
---
a holder of sukuk has not technically lent the issuer money; instead, he owns a nominal share of whatever the money was spent on and derives income not from interest but either from the profit generated by that asset or from rental payments made by the issuer. At the end of the sukuk’s term the issuer returns the principal to the investor by buying his share of the asset. Cynics may point out that the difference between these structures and a conventional bond or mortgage is, in practice, rather slight: both provide predictable income to those who make their capital available.
But are those payments compounded like interest?
Yes, and the lie that media and warmongers constantly repeat that Ahmedinejad said "We want to wipe Israel off the face of the map." When in truth he said "We want to remove the regime from the pages of time." Removing a regime is a far cry from destroying a whole country.
"How many f---ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015"
This is an interesting question with an difficult answer, since it has been illegal to count the numbers of Jewish people in this country since the start of the great Jewish immigration in the late 1800s. Why do they want to hide their numbers and do not want to be classified?
It also begs the question of how many zionist servants are in the United States... and does it matter?
There's also the question of Crypto-Jews. A very large number of Jews in America, especially the Bible Belt, just pretend to be some random denomination of Protestant while preaching that Christians have to sacrifice themselves to save Israel because the Bible says so. Pretty good propaganda strategy when you're manipulating hillbillies to do your will. But people are wising up.
American Christians are the biggest suckers in history. They've been fallling for the Scofield bullshit for generatiions.
It's not a conspiracy. United States Census tracks country of origin not religion.
"How many Jews in America?" is always a mystery. But we can count to the nose how many Muslims/Catholics/Protestants/Hare Krishnas. Odd that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population_by_country#Debate_over_A...
Bet you the number is six million
Wow a Jewish guy must've pumped and dumped Coulter. She's been a fucking a Israeli war on the middle East advocate and shill since I was but a wee lad.
Probably asked to convert, said no and got dumped. Plus the endless performing of cunnilingus on her female superiors, plus the obligatory sucking of circumcised cock, to climb the career ladder only to be told you don't belong. " Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" I'm only kidding guys, I've no idea why Coulter told the truth last night, as being told the truth today in any form is a shock to the system.
By Biblicism Institute
(If you do not know the origin of the Ashkenazim, you might want to do so before reading this article by clicking here.)
To conquer the West, the Ashkenazim applied a simple two-step process.
1) Morph themselves into God’s Chosen People.
2) Take over the issuance of money.
They fully understood that there are only two entities that most men on earth revere: God and Money.
“You cannot serve both God and money.” Matthew 6:24
So they succeeded in steering both to their advantage.
STEP 1
To outwit the Christian West, it was essential that the Ashkenazi Jews reinvent themselves.
To do so they had to tinkle with biblical terminologies. But first a little background.
The faith that is known as Judaism today was never called thus.
Rabbi Adolph Moses in collaboration with Rabbi H.G. Enlow explained clearly in “Yahvism and Other Discourses,” that: “Among the innumerable misfortunes which have befallen… the most fatal in its consequences is the name Judaism… neither in biblical nor post-biblical, neither in Talmudic nor in much later times, is the term Judaism ever heard…”
And what was it called before?
Rabbi Louis Finkelstein stated in his book “The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith” that: “Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name . . . the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives, unaltered . . . From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered . . . demonstrates the enduring importance which attaches to Pharisaism as a religious movement . . .”
Judaism is actually Pharisaism and therefore it is a misnomer since it is neither the doctrine of Judah nor the doctrine that Christ practiced.
“Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future,” explains the Jewish Encyclopedia.
In fact Pharisaism is the doctrine of the Pharisees of old, an evil doctrine they brought back from their Babylonian captivity. It does not follow the truth of the Bible, neither of the Old Testament nor of the New. Its central tenets are found in a book called the Talmud, a book full of worldly traditions, lies, and superstitions.
“The Babylonian Talmud is based on the mystical religious practices of the Babylonians which were assimilated by the Judahite Rabbis during their Babylonian captivity around 600 B.C. The Rabbis then used these occult traditions in place of the word of God,” wrote Edward Hendrie in Solving the Mystery of Babylon the Great.
And that is why Jesus was constantly rebuking the Pharisees:
“You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” John 8:44
“You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.” Mark 7:8
“You serpents, you brood of vipers, how will you escape the sentence of hell?” Matthew 23:33
“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.” Matthew 23:15
The term Judaism was first coined by historian Flavius Josephus in the first century as he described the history, the civilization, the language, the poetry, the religion, the art, the science, the manners, the customs, the institutions, and the genocide of the Ancient Judahites. It was not coined with the intention of starting a religion and nor is Judaism even mentioned in the Bible.
The people who first seized the term Judaism and its historical content were then Christians. They were using it as an educational tool to acquaint themselves with the true Judahite Hebrews who practiced the doctrine of Christ. Such a mechanism allowed them to better comprehend the Epistles of the Apostles.
As a result, they were able to grasp two important facts that have eluded today’s Christians:
a) that the Judahite Hebrews who became Christians were the true Israel of God whom God spared the Great Tribulation during the Apocalypse of AD 70 – an event a lot of Christians today think is in the future;
b) that those who followed the Pharisees were not the true Israel of God and therefore were not spared during said catastrophe that saw the genocide and the end of the Hebrew race.
“For they are not all Israel which are of Israel…” Romans 9:6
“The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.” 2 Peter 3:9
“Behold, your house is being left to you desolate!” Matthew 23:38
In effect those Judahite Hebrews who followed the Pharisees were the seed of the Devil, a truth the Apostle John was trying to convey in Revelation by calling them “Babylon”.
“The name written on her forehead was a mystery: Babylon the great, the mother of prostitutes, and of the abominations of the earth.” Revelation 17:5
Proselytes of Pharisaism or Rabbinists in 15th/16th Century Spain and Portugal were called Marranos, meaning pigs or dirty. Many of them converted to Christianity and were called Conversos. However, some modern Jewish historians tried to sanitize Marranos by saying that said word was only used when adherents of Pharisaism converted to Christianity. But the facts say otherwise.
Most historians – even hardcore Jewish ones like Benzion Netanyahu (Yes, Bibi’s dad) – called those who converted Conversos not Marranos. Brian Chalmers in his review of Netanyahu’s book wrote: “(Netanyahu) marshals evidence and arguments in an effort to prove that the “New Christians” were sincere adherents of Christianity, and even “ardent assimilationists” who were eager to marry into Christian families and otherwise melt into Spanish society…. the Conversos were actually sincere Christians.”
Given that the Ashkenazim – who are not Judahite Hebrews – were themselves followers and proselytes of Pharisaism, a religion Christians everywhere frowned upon, they realized they needed a new image, a new public relations campaign that would put them in a more favorable light. And the reason they wanted that was because they had a Machiavellian plan. They were planning to conquer the West.
So they sprang into action some time in the 18th century. They sharpened their Chutzpah and endeavored to get Christians to see them as the true Israel of God. Their purely cosmetic overhaul would consist in a) renaming Pharisaism Judaism; yes, that very Judaism Christians were using for educational purposes and b) reinventing themselves as “Jews”, an expression Christians were using to describe Judahite Hebrews or Judeans (i.e., people from the tribe of Judah). It was the perfect hoodwinking package that gullible Christians could easily swallow.
Jewish-born historian Benjamin Freedman explained it thus:
“When the word “Jew” was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was “Judean.” During the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries a well-organized and well-financed international “pressure group” created a so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” among the English-speaking peoples of the world. This so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word “Jew”. It is a misrepresentation.”
As it stands, the adherents of Pharisaism or Rabbinists not only hijacked the word Judaism, but they also misappropriated the word Jew. However – over time and as it pertains to Christianity – the word Jew was completely hollowed out of its “Judean” or “Judahite” meaning because those who hijacked it were not of the tribe of Judah. In fact, in many Christian circles today, that word causes quite the confusion.
Again, here’s historian Benjamin Freedman:
“The present generally accepted “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the word “Jew” today, to the preponderant majority of intelligent and informed’ Christians, is contradictory and in complete conflict with incontestable historic fact. Christians who cannot be fooled any longer are suspect of the Christian clergy who continue to repeat, and repeat, and repeat ad nauseam their pet theme song “Jesus was a Jew“. It actually now approaches a psychosis.
“Countless Christians know today that they were “brain washed” by the Christian clergy on the subject “Jesus was a Jew”… (They) are also becoming more and more alerted day by day why the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world for three centuries have spent uncounted sums of money to manufacture the fiction that the “Judeans” in the time of Jesus were “Jews” rather than “Judeans”, and that “Jesus was a Jew”.”
The forced evolution of the word “Jew” is similar to the evolution that befell the word “gay”. Gay=Merry became Gay=Homosexual. Try telling someone who’s happy (and who’s not a homosexual) that you’re glad he’s so “gay” and see what happens.
Another example is when many Christians today interact with a Jew they just met, their immediate reaction is to say: “Oh, Jesus was a Jew too.” What they’re unwittingly saying is that “Oh, Jesus was a Pharisee too.”
Oh, the blasphemy!
The word “Jew” is so entrenched in describing one who follows Pharisaism (now Judaism) that it’s been completely emptied of its original meaning. Hence it no longer describes a Judahite or Judean, the actual word in the non-translated bible. That is why it needs to be struck from the translated bible because all it does is create confusion in the Christian mind; and that very confusion is exactly what Satan wants in order to unseat Christians as the new Chosen People – chosen to love and to do good – and to calumniate Christ as a Pharisee.
“God is not the author of confusion…” 1 Corinthians 14:33
Since Mr. Freedman referred to “an international pressure group” that influenced the “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” as it applies to followers of Pharisaism, and since he also mentioned that it was well-financed and that it spent uncounted sums of money, the only way to really discover it is to go back to the 18th Century and unearth the MONEY behind it. After all, money talks and that other stuff floats.
In the mid-18th century, one family stood out as the ultimate MONEY family, the German-born Ashkenazi Jews known as the Rothschilds.
Wikipedia explains:
Mentmore Towers, one of the many Rothschild properties
“The family’s ascent to international prominence began in 1744, with the birth of Mayer Amschel Rothschild in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. He was the son of Amschel Moses Rothschild, (born circa 1710), a money changer who had traded with the Prince of Hesse. Born in the “Judengasse“, the ghetto of Frankfurt, Mayer developed a finance house and spread his empire by installing each of his five sons in the five main European financial centres in London, Paris, Vienna and Naples, as well as Frankfurt.
“During the 19th century, when it was at its height, the Rothschild family is believed by some to have possessed the largest private fortune in the world, as well as the largest private fortune in modern world history.”
Could it be that the Rothschilds were the ones behind this “pressure group” that commandeered the word Jew and hijacked the word Judaism as part of their Machiavellian plan?
If so what did they stand to gain?
Actually there are two good reasons why the Rothschilds would absolutely be involved, if not being themselves the originators of said plan of conquest.
i. They had an insidiously wicked vision. They wanted to transform Palestine into Israel.
Again, Wikipedia explains:
“After the death of James Jacob de Rothschild in 1868, his eldest son Alphonse Rothschild took over the management of the family bank and was the most active in support for Eretz Israel. The Rothschild family archives show that during the 1870s the family contributed nearly 500,000 francs per year on behalf of Eastern Jewry to the Alliance Israélite Universelle. Baron Edmond James de Rothschild, youngest son of James Jacob de Rothschild, was a patron of the first settlement in Palestine at Rishon-LeZion, and bought from Ottoman landlords parts of the land which now makes up present-day Israel.
“In 1917 Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration to the Zionist Federation, which committed the British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
“In 1924, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild established the Palestine Jewish Colonisation Association (PICA), which acquired more than 125,000 acres (50,586 ha) of land and set up business ventures. In Tel Aviv, there is a road, Rothschild Boulevard, named after him as well as various localities throughout Israel which he assisted in founding including Metulla, Zikhron Ya’akov, Rishon Lezion and Rosh Pina. The Rothschilds also played a significant part in the funding of Israel’s governmental infrastructure. James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the State of Israel and the Supreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy de Rothschild.”
Baron David René de Rothschild, current French chairman of N M Rothschild & Sons
Thus, in cahoots with the British Empire, the Rothschilds conspired to create the state of Israel on the stolen land of Palestine. Apparently they got tired of these random land purchases. They wanted the whole enchilada. So they gobbled up the whole thing, the whole of Palestine using the British army (much the way AIPAC is using the US Army to wage all these Middle East wars to benefit Israel).
Only powerful money could have caused something of that dimension to materialize. What other private individuals in history do you know of managed to accomplish something of that magnitude? It’s not everyday one gets to buy his own country or in this instance steal one, especially since in so doing one is putting at risk the very Empire that’s helping. See Israel: the Scourge of Empires. Consequently and because of said risk more than money was needed for the realization of such an audacious plan.
“America’s traditional churches in the 19th Century would never stand for a Jewish occupation of Jesus’ homeland,” explained author C.E. Carlson.
Therefore, the Ashkenazim needed a miracle.
They needed to be recognized by the West as the true Israel of God in order to keep the populace of the Christian Empires mollified and agreeable as they endeavored to steal the Holy Land which from a religious standpoint was mostly controlled at the time by the Catholic Church/Empire thanks to its many crusades to unseat the “infidel” Muslims.
So Pharisaism or Rabbinism became Judaism while its adherents miraculously became the “Jews” of the Bible. Whoever said money can’t buy miracles. :-)
As the Ashkenazim finalized their naturalization as “Jews” of the bible, they sent out a loud message to the Christian world: the kinsmen of Christ were still around and therefore had the right as per “biblical prophecies” to return to “their homeland” Israel, temporarily called Palestine in their eyes (even though the Ashkenazim and all the other racially identifiable “Jews” are not even remotely related to our Lord Jesus Christ, and none of their ancestors ever lived neither East nor West of the Jordan). See Are Jews the Israelites of the Bible?
Thereupon, in order to start and keep alive the illusion that the creation of modern-day Israel was the result of “biblical prophecies”, they financed many “commentary bibles” such as the Scofield Reference Bible with purposely erroneous commentaries about the return of the “Jews” to “their homeland” along with the non-biblical rapture theology and brainwashing references about “anti-semitism” being a sin. They also kept on payroll compromised preachers like John Hagee to constantly brainwash the flock by spewing out their demonic bile in reference to Israeli “Jews” as God’s “Chosen People”.
And for good measure, they resurrected the Sanhedrin Court of old that condemned Christ to death in order to threaten with the wrath of “God’s Chosen” those who dare to contradict the Zionist view that the entirety of the stolen land of Palestine belongs to Israel.
ii. They wanted respect, control, power, and possibly even worship.
By pretending to follow Judaism, “the doctrine of Judah” (by inference the doctrine that Christ the Judahite practiced), and by pretending to be Jews (by inference Judahites), the Rothschilds and their pharisaic brethren would be seen in a whole new light by Western Christians.
No longer would Christians compare them to the dreaded Pharisees of old whom Jesus was constantly rebuking. No longer would Christians paint a mental picture of them as children of the Devil.
And no more would they be treated as pharisaic heathens and pigs deserving of calumnia as the Europeans were wont to appraise them as followers of Pharisaism.
Now they would be seen as those of Judah who escaped and await God’s salvation.
By becoming Jews who practice Judaism, the Ashkenazim positioned themselves and their co-religionists in the minds of Christians as those whom God has not rejected.
“I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? May it never be!” Romans 1:11
By implication they became the chosen people.
Hence all followers of Pharisaism would no longer be identified by the outside world as Ashkenazim, Sephardim, Samaritans, Europeans, or Africans, but simply as Jews, the kinsmen of Jesus Christ, the God of the Western world.
Thus “Judaism” and “Jew” became the immediate revisionist words that historians endeavored to apply as the financial incentive to do so was extremely tempting. As a result, the words that were used to describe the adherents of Pharisaism and their religion were sanitized (just like when Blacks wanted to be called Negroes no more). This in turn caused compromised writers of all stripes to follow suit as they searched for any excuse to exploit the word “Jew” in reference to proselytes of Pharisaism.
For example, pre-18th century playwrights who employed the word IEWE (Iewe means Judahite) in their work never meant to describe a JEW in the sense of the religious person we know today, but that didn’t matter to those who had revisionism in mind.
Jesus whips the money changers
As a case in point, in The Merchant of Venice, Shakespeare’s Shylock the Iewe was a fictional creative construct that borrowed its obvious tautology from the biblical Judahite money changers whom Jesus whipped and chased out of the Temple. Its creation was not intended to mimick Rabbinists of Shakespeare’s time. Nonetheless, it’s been widely and erroneously interpreted to mean a “JEW” in the modern sense.
In “Was Shylock a Jew?” Professor Emma Smith explained it thus:
“That ‘Jew’ (Iewe) might be an adjective rather than a noun – an attribute of a person which does not always or only denote religion or race – is common in its deployment in early modern English… In the early modern period, the signifier ‘Jew’ (Iewe) had become at least partially detached from the racial or religious signified with which it is now firmly associated… R.H. Tawney – along with Shakespeare’s own biography – demonstrated long ago that Elizabethan money lending was ‘not a profession but a bye-employment’. Thus the early modern association between Jews and money lending was almost always a knowing fiction…”
Shakespeare was not anti-Jew as some allege, and nor was Shylock created to malign those who today are known as Jews especially when he was penned at a time when “Jews” were called Rabbinists (followers of the Babylonian Talmud) and everyone knew they were not of the tribe of Judah.
And yet, compromised historians and critics convoluted the whole Shylock-money-lender thing and re-engineered it to be construed as anti-“Jew”. As Professor Smith pointed out: “…the representation of anti-semitism is more interesting and significant to us…”
With such favorable intellectual and religious dispositions that only money could buy, the Rothschilds were now sociologically unfettered to amass their fortunes through wars, usury, and fiat money of their own central banks in partnership with their Ashkenazi brethren. This in turn allowed them to accumulate more power, control world events, and dispossess another people (the Palestinians) of their land.
As “kinsmen of Jesus”, they figured quite presciently that no one would dare frown upon them as they went about their nefarious activities. After all, Jews are “God’s chosen” and as such God is the one who is blessing them.
So, hands off.
But if, God forbid, they were to be frowned upon, they could always buy off their detractors or accuse them of being conspiracy theorists or destroy their lives by labeling them anti-semites when Jews are not even Semites.
“…it is impossible to change the genetic make-up from Caucasian to Semitic. Which automatically nullifies their claim to be returning to Israel, the land of their forebears, because their forebears were never in Biblical Israel,” explained Benjamin Disraeli, a former Jew himself and a Victorian Prime Minister of Great Britain, referring to the Ashkenazim who were migrating from Russia and Eastern Europe.
So, lo and behold, the reality of the modern Pharisees was re-calibrated. “Abracadabra!” incanted the genie and there they were, the adherents of the doctrine of Judah, the “Jews” of the bible, the chosen Hebrews (when all Hebrews are irrevocably dead).
“We came to this country (Palestine) that was populated by Arabs and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state there,” vomited Ashkenazi-Israeli General Moshe Dayan, now deceased burning-in-hell war criminal.
Oh, the Chutzpah!
STEP 2
“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws” – Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
Rothschild Coat of Arms
The Rothschilds and their fellow Ashkenazic partners began their international control of money in Europe and from there extended it throughout the world.
Wikipedia and the Jewish Encyclopedia clarify it thus:
“Mayer Rothschild’s strategy was to keep control of their banks in family hands, allowing them to maintain full secrecy about the size of their fortunes. In about 1906, the Jewish Encyclopedia noted: ‘The practice initiated by the Rothschilds of having several brothers of a firm establish branches in the different financial centres of the world was followed by other Jewish financiers, like the Bischoffsheims, Pereires, Seligmans, Lazards and others, and these financiers obtained credit not alone with their Jewish confrères, but with the banking fraternity in general. By this means Jewish financiers obtained an increasing share of international finance during the middle and last quarter of the 19th century. The head of the whole group was the Rothschild family…’ “
The Worship of Mammon by Evelyn De Morgan.
Said share of international finance reached its apex in 1913 when they finally established a Central Bank in America. It would be known as the Federal Reserve System. They managed to bring it to life by bribing their way through the US Government and Congress. Such method was necessary because the Federal Reserve System is in fact a private enterprise that is pretending to be a US Government institution. It is a cover to secure the privilege of issuing money.
To conceal their scheme, the Rothschilds and their co-conspirators attached to said central bank the “FEDERAL” moniker, a clear misnomer intended to hoodwink gullible Americans – quite the obvious pattern, isn’t it? As a result, money creation in the US went from the People’s Representatives to a group of wealthy men who all strangely happened to be Ashkenazi Jews (except for their token non-Jewish partners):
1. Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin.
2. Lazard Brothers Banks of Paris.
3. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy.
4. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam.
5. Lehman Brothers of NY.
6. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of NY (Now Shearson American Express).
7. Goldman Sachs of NY
8. National Bank of Commerce NY/Morgan Guaranty Trust (J. P. Morgan Bank – Equitable Life – Levi P. Morton are principal shareholders).
9. Hanover Trust of NY (William and David Rockefeller & Chase National Bank NY are principal shareholders).
Dean Henderson in his article The Federal Reserve Cartel clearly explained and confirmed the private ownership of the Federal Reserve:
“J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank – by far the most powerful Fed branch – by just eight families, four of which reside in the US. They are,
• the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York
• the Rothschilds of Paris and London
• the Warburgs of Hamburg
• the Lazards of Paris
• the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome
“CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches. He names,
• N.M. Rothschild of London
• Rothschild Bank of Berlin
• Warburg Bank of Hamburg
• Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
• Lehman Brothers of New York
• Lazard Brothers of Paris
• Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
• Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy
• Goldman Sachs of New York
• JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York
“Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others.
“The control that these banking families exert over the global economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally shrouded in secrecy. Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as ‘conspiracy theory’. “
Woodrow Wilson bitterly regretted the bribe he took for his role in creating the Federal Reserve: “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world — no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”
Many pundits love to explain that the Federal Reserve is a partnership between the private banks and the Federal Government.
Bull biscuit!
“Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders,” explained the Honorable Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee in the 1930s.
Pity the poor soul that believes the Fed is playing by the Federal Government’s rules! The only rule the Fed knows is the one that enriches its secret and not so secret members.
According to Forbes, the Federal Reserve in 2008 alone – under the oh! so responsible watch of the Ashkenazi Ben ‘Helicopter’ Bernanke – single-handedly allocated “over $16 Trillion to corporations and banks internationally, purportedly for ‘financial assistance.’ ” Other sources put it at close to $30 Trillion, twice the size of America’s GDP. And none of that money has been accounted for. These transactions were only discovered after a “quick audit” that then Congressman Ron Paul miraculously managed to squeeze out of the Fed when he was beating the drums trying to get Americans to pay attention to the secretive bank.
So who really got all that money? Was it only $16 – 30 Trillion? And how much money has actually been stolen since the founding of the Federal Reserve? No one knows. Not even Congress. And no politician would even utter a word about it. Plus notice how such brazen thievery did not get any play in the mainstream media.
If you think that these Ashkenazim who took control over the US Central banking system did not turn on the money spigot for their fellow Jews in order to create a Jewish stranglehold on the US economy and beyond, then you’re a bigger fool than Judas who sold his Lord for 30 pieces of silver.
No wonder close to half of all billionaires (“half” is what we’re told) in the US are Ashkenazi Jews. And it’s no coincidence either that they dominate the US Media.
“…the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands,” predicted Baruch Levi in his Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de Paris, p574, June 1st. 1928.
By controlling the money supply, they’re able to buy anything and anyone – anyone who serves the MONEY god that is. Said control abets the Jewish financiers to steer the US Government which in turn steers the world.
The heart of the US Government is Congress. It is full of Judases who have sold out their country to said MONEY god.
“… (America) is just an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for President or being elected President. And the same thing applies to governors, and U.S. Senators and Congress members,” explained former President Jimmy Carter.
That is why all American politicians and especially Congressmen (except for a handful few) kowtow to AIPAC (secretly known as the Ashkenazi-Israeli Political Action Committee), its bribe money, its control of the corrupt Federal Reserve, and its treasonous attitude in favor of Israel above American interests. Whatever Israel wants, Israel gets.
As Pat Buchanan quipped: “Congress is Israeli-occupied territory.”
The MONEY god
The only modern-day US politician who went head-to-head with the MONEY god was President Kennedy. He signed Executive Order 11110 which authorized the US Treasury to issue Silver Certificates and to coin Silver Dollars, a smart move that if fully implemented would have put the Federal Reserve out of commission. Strangely, five months after issuing said order, he was assassinated. Silver Certificates and Dollars were then tossed into the dustbin of oblivion.
Even the President of the United States is no match for the MONEY god. Poor Kennedy had to be made an example of in order to warn all American politicians to beware of bearding the Devil in his den.
CONCLUSION
Jesus was right.
One cannot serve both God and Money. One must choose.
PaintedChrist.com
Money is governed by the Devil himself. He knows that most people fear him and won’t worship him, but that they sure will worship Money. And when they do, their hearts would no longer be available to genuinely worship the true God whom he hates.
So that sly Devil carefully chose whom he would hand the control of money to. But unfortunately for him and his minions, God is the one who has the final say.
Besides, Jesus already wrote the end of the story, and it favors those who worship Him:
“Behold, I will cause those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Judahites and are not, but lie– I will make them come and bow down at your feet, and make them know that I have loved you.” Revelation 3: 9