This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Getting Paid for Doing the Obvious?
By Chris at www.CapitalistExploits.at
I've spent a good few hours running. Up hills, down hills, along flats... just running.
A not so startling realization is that running uphill burns more calories, is more taxing on your body, makes you breathe harder, and will make you tire faster than running on a flat or downhill. Running downhill is easier and less taxing on your body. Consequently only protein bar munching fitness nuts, and criminals escaping the scene of a crime, willingly and gleefully run uphill. The rest of us enjoy it when the decline hits.
I've also spent a good while trading currencies. Like running up and down hills, currency trading can be more or less taxing on your account, depending on the currency pair you're trading. When trading currencies, it's important to understand if you're running up or downhill. I want to draw your attention to the costs associated with trading currency pairs.
When you trade a currency pair what you're doing is borrowing one currency in order to buy another But as a trader you don't care for taking settlement. What you're concerned about is profiting from the change in exchange rates. Since you're borrowing one currency it stands to reason that you'll be paying interest on your borrowed currency (short position), and consequently, since you're buying another, you'll be receiving interest on the bought currency (long position).
This particular paying and receiving of interest is commonly referred to as rollover. At day's end all accounts are settled and if you don't wish to pay or receive interest then you need to close out your trade before day's end. Here is the important bit to understand...
When you're borrowing a currency which enjoys a lower yield than the currency which you're buying then you get paid the difference at the end of every day. A good thing from a cashflow perspective.
If, on the other hand, you're the other way around, you pay the difference. The problem, as with life in general, is that there is typically no free lunch. More often than not the best risk reward trade setups leave us paying, not receiving interest on a cross pair. You don't want to be the guy who thought he was going for a nice gentle downhill run only to find you're running up the steepest and longest hill you've ever come across, ensuring that you will absolutely puke along the way.
What is typical is that the currency which is weakening simultaneously enjoys a higher yield than the one which it is weakening against. This makes sense since the risk to holding the currency is higher and higher risk, ceteris paribus, should mean higher reward. For instance, long US dollar and short Chinese yuan means that the spread works against you. You'll be paying the difference between yields not receiving it.
Below is a chart, taken from Interactive Brokers, with the rates. Bear in mind these change all the time and differ from broker to broker but the principle is important to understand.
Source: Interactive Brokers
The attentive amongst you will notice a wonderful anomaly.
Long USD/JPY pays you to hold this position while the yen is weakening. It's the Holy Grail of cross pairs. The reason here is that the BoJ can hold the bond market together and keep yields very low and ironically massively devalue the yen at the same time. We've been in this trade for a long long time now and it's paid us handsomely not only since the yen has lost so much value against the dollar but also because of the positive carry aspect.
The reason I talk about these little nuances is that it's important for me to be positioned the best possible way at all times and if that's true for me, it's likely true for you too. This all becomes important as we stand today on the precipice of an emerging market liquidation - something I've written about here and here.
Remember the Asian crisis?
Just for some historical context consider Indonesia which went down 95% in dollar terms in a little over a year! Korea, hardly a basket case country itself, collapsed 90% in the same time frame. Liquidity just evaporated from the market. I'm not sure investors today get it.
We're there again.Liquidity is drying up and we think that we're on the brink of liquidity collapsing, resulting in some gloriously curvy wavy charts like the one above. How long? I think we've already tipped over, we're in it... just the very early stage. The next stage is the waterfall, the rapid"oh my God, how did that happen?" stage.
Where and What Blows Up?
Some great work done by CreditSights reveals where risk lies:
Brazil is already being punished, Chile has ways to go as does Colombia. Heck, put into context of how enormous this carry trade is, I think they've hardly moved yet.
I think we'll also get trouble in energy. We're already seeing it in shale and later this week I've got something special to share with you on that topic as it's timely. I also think we'll see it in emerging market equities in a big way. Emerging market corporate debt looks even worse.
Understanding the opportunity is one thing, though.
I know plenty very very smart PhDs but the one thing that no longer surprises me, but did for a long time, was how few of them were rich. They're the equivalent of the geek in the bar who can identify the hottest girl because he has studied every possible feature of every single girl in the room but you know he's still going home alone because he hasn't gotten off his behind to talk to any of them and see how they actually work.
Understanding how to execute on an opportunity is a different mindset! It requires a tolerance for risk, a belief in your own analysis, a backing of yourself, and it requires action. We detailed in our complimentary USD Bull Report what was going to happen in this market. It's happening now and the big move lies just over the horizon. Or we're wrong. How about we let the market show us?
Next time I've got a treat for you regarding the energy sector that I think you'll find fascinating.
- Chris
"Ideas are easy. It's the execution of ideas that really separates the sheep from the goats." - Sue Graft
»
- advertisements -
This comment is off topic but we need your help and it just might save the lives of your friends and family on 1000's more people you will never know. Please sign this petition to get the Red Cross and United Way to stop donating and installing dangerous ionization smoke alarms that do not detect smolding smoke which has resulted in 10' of 1000's of smoke inhalation deaths and 100's of 1000's fire injuries over last 40 years.
The ion manufactures have been sued several times yet still market these dangerous devices bcause they are cheaper to make than the safer photoelectric alarms so they make more profit selling the cheaper often deadlt ion alarms. Thanks for your support !
https://www.change.org/p/gail-mcgovern-american-red-cross-internationa-federation-of-red-cross-and-red-cresent-societies-brian-gallagher-united-way-demand-red-cross-and-others-stop-installing-ionized-detectors-and-warn-public-of-dangers
Everyone is a creative writer.
I got to – “and will make you tire faster”
Long USDCHF would appear to top USDJPY for the carry. It's also a huge chuffing bull flag on the weekly...
As a long time runner, I can assure you, running downhill is much harder on the body than running uphill -- especially on the joints.
As a long time driver, I can assure you, that the gas millage saved from coasting downhill (whilest talking on your new Ifone, texing to friends VASTLY outweights the problems incurred on your joints.
:)
Fed Audit Shocker: They Come from Planet Klepto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jt377DV2BKs
[one] thing is clear regardless: the Fed is driving the U.S. into a 2nd depression in order to carry out its one and only remit now that America’s ability to produce real jobs has been reduced to ash, namely, propping up criminal banks with multi-trillion-dollar giveaways.
What’s so disturbing about the fatal path that the Fed has been on for 7 years is that it's one the Fed went down before, when—by its own admission—it extended and deepened the Great Depression in the late 1930s with a foolhardy policy that jacked up total reserves and destroyed bank lending. In the words of Janet Yellen, "[t]he economy plunged back into depression." (6/23/09 tr. at p. 175)
The problem with the theory is that low interest rates do *not* devalue currencies. The ability to hold interest rates low and not spark inflation is actually a trait of an incredibly strong and strengthening currency.
In the short term, the traders might try and short-sell the lower-rate currencies and go long the higher rate ones -- a sort of 'carry trade' as some might term it, but history is full of examples where that ends up failing spectacularly. Especially as reality sets in, and fundamentals re-assert themselves.
China, being such a strong exporter, will be able to move its policy rates down severely over the coming years. Might not be ZIRP, but will be pretty close to it. Probably co-incident with currency strengthening in China as deflation sets in. Borrowing currencies of the chronic net exporters is a road to ruin over the long term.
Yes, as I said earlier, welcome to global Weimar!
Good time to get into the cash wheelbarrow business.....