This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Last Two Times this Happened, the US Was Falling into a Recession
By Wolf Richter www.wolfstreet.com
Revenues of the companies in the S&P 500 have been declining all year. Companies and analysts blamed the strong dollar. They blamed China. They blamed oil, Greece, Japan, and a million other things. In the first quarter, revenues dropped 2.9% from a year earlier. In the second quarter they dropped 3.4%. And in the third quarter, according to FactSet, they’re expected to decline by 3.4%.
The last time year-over-year revenues declined two quarters in a row was in 2009 during the Financial Crisis [read… Revenue Recession Spreads past Dollar, Energy]. Now there have been three quarters in a row of revenue declines.
It’s tough out there.
Given this revenue debacle, corporate earnings growth has been shrinking. By Q2, it turned negative (-0.7%), according to FactSet. And in Q3, earnings “growth” dropped deeper into the negative, now estimated at -5.9%, despite all the expert financial engineering, share buybacks, and accounting tricks that companies have been leveraging with great skill and singular dedication.
But if US-based corporations blame the strong dollar, then foreign-based corporations should benefit from the strong dollar. It’s a zero-sum game: if one loses the other gains. We’ve already seen profits soar at Japanese corporations during the early phases of the yen devaluation in 2013 and 2014.
But that bonanza is over. Companies in other countries have been struggling too, despite the strong dollar that should have been beneficial to their non-dollar financial reports. And some of the deterioration has been reflected in global share prices, which have gotten hammered, including in Japan.
The MSCI AC world index, which captures large and mid-cap stocks across 23 developed markets and 23 emerging markets, has now been dropping for two quarters in a row – worst performance in four years.
Turns out, for the companies around the globe that comprise the MSCI AC, earnings “growth,” as measured by 12-month trailing earnings, is in even worse shape than for those in the S&P 500: by Q2, it was -7%!
So this is a global thing.
It has not primarily been triggered by the strong dollar, but by a global slowdown in revenues caused by a global slowdown in demand.
The last two times that earnings of the S&P 500 companies reached this point – in Q1 of 2001 and in Q4 2007 – the US was already in a recession.
The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), which decides when a run-of-the-mill downturn becomes an official recession, hadn’t acknowledged the recessions at the time, but it did so later on. The same will be true during the next official recession. We’ll be told only after it’s too late.
This chart by Economics and Strategy at Bank National Financial shows how earnings growth for the S&P 500 companies, as measured by 12-month trailing earnings, has sharply deteriorated, and by Q2 was barely above zero. This is slightly higher than the FactSet numbers for Q2 (-0.7%). For the companies in the MSCI AC index, earnings shrank by 7%. I added the green and blue parallel lines, the arrows, and the red circles to highlight what was going on when the prior two earnings debacles hit: the beginnings of the 2001 recession and the glorious Financial Crisis:
The last time earnings of the companies in the MSCI AC were shrinking like this without a recession was in 1993. And according to the measure used by Bank National Financial, the last time earnings of the S&P 500 companies were close to zero without a recession was in 1998. But if FactSet is correct in its estimate for Q3 earnings growth (-5.9%), all bets are off.
That just doesn’t happen without a US recession
The reason is simple: When corporate revenues and earnings tank, bad stuff starts happening. Companies curtail their investments further, and they cut expenses even more, all of which are a drag on the economy. And they whittle down their workforce, which drags down consumer demand even further.
This coincides with today’s high business inventories and inventory-sales-ratios. To bring inventories in line with lower demand, companies slash their orders, and this additional hit to demand ricochets up the supply chain.
These are normal business cycles. Recessions happen. They’re essential in what is left of the free-market system. It’s the process of cleaning up after a party, shutting down what doesn’t work, taking losses, wiping out debt through bankruptcies, and building the base for the next growth period.
What’s different this time?
Interest rates are already at zero. The Fed’s balance sheet is weighed down by $4 trillion in QE assets. Companies have loaded up on debt, much of it high-risk junk bonds and leveraged loans, that many companies will not be able to service during leaner times. Governments at all levels, after years of deficit spending, are burdened with enormous amounts of debt, with for example, US gross national debt more than doubling since the onset of the Financial Crisis.
And when the recession materializes, all these chickens are going to come home to roost.
So now everyone is hoping for some kind of earnings miracle in 2016, however unlikely that may seem. As Bank National Financial put it – with a total lack of conviction:
The bottom-up consensus currently sees an earnings rebound of 7.4% for the constituents of the S&P 500 over the next 12 months and about 8% for the MSCI AC. But will it come?
We think earnings growth is possible in 2016, provided of course that a few things go right. First, the global economy needs to get out of its funk.”
But by the looks of it, the global economy is just now sinking deeper into “its funk.”
So the risks the Fed promised to banish from the globe suddenly return with a vengeance. Read… This Chart Truly Depicts a New, Terrible Trend in Jobs Mess
- advertisements -
Tough to get a rise when the handouts are more then the producers can provide. This will not end well.
Faling into recession? What has this been for the last 8 years?
Chicago overtakes Detroit as the worst performing housing market: San Diego outperforms while Los Angeles hits a snag.I want to see a graph of World Earnings against World Debt Growth (the change/acceleration of debt creation)
Im sure the borrowed money stokes the economy like heroine, it wears off and each time greater injections required. Come 2016 looking at that graph the amount of debt needed to be thrown for a revenue growth is gonna be off the scale. We are going to need $1trillion to create $1 of revenue growth.
See, this is the problem when you can eat but cant shit.
Get ready for the Big Global Crap.
Put your index finger and middle finger on your left hand in front of you, then separate them (like this <) and you have what that chart would look like. If inverted, then it would look like this >. On the former, the debt is upward and earnings are downward.
Uh oh.
Somebody found an empty quart bottle of MiraLax by the punchbowl...
Better start heading for the door cuz it's going to get ugly real soon.
Everything is like a reverse tontine, Instead of the payout increaing as time goes by the taxes increase and the payout is reduced and the less people have to spend so they increase the taxes and reduce the payout....vicious cycle, Sid vicious.
Stocks generally down YTD (the indices) so maybe there is a correlation to revenue/profit growth.
"What's different" The level of propaganda...
Since when did revenues or earnings have any relevance for stock prices?
You are correct; that would be fundamentals; they are "old school". Put the chart of QE1, 2, 3 with ZIRP next to the S&P and you find a direct parallel. Now note the sideways to downward trend since the official end of QE3.
If the markets continue upward from here to new highs; it is because the addicts have gotten or anticipating more market-heroine.
BTFD is dead. It died when the S&P crossed below the 250 sma and you'll notice what happened right after. The market is consolidating before the next leg lower. The consolidation ends when it rises above the 250 or drops below the August lows. Until it crosses the 250 (2050 right now) you can sell every rip. Don't get greedy, don't go too short if your doing options. I also put a small amount way out of the money each week which made me smile in August. We probably have at least one more wave after this one before it breaks lower. There will be fewer rips to sell then so you'll need a new strategy.
Torture the numbers till they confess. Our economy is now predicated on numbers with no basis in reality, but the game must be played, even if the game is russian roulette.....
slow moving train wreck keeps going
One of my first lessons in business from a very wise and experienced mentor was "Grow the revenues and everything else will take care of itself".
And get vendors who need you more than you need them.
Wasn't there a bond crash in 1993-94 ?
Wasn't there a bond crash in 1993-94 ?