The Derivatives Market: Bets, Bookies, and Fraud

Sprott Money's picture




Hold your real assets outside of the system in a private, non-government controlled, international facility   -->




The Derivatives Market: Bets, Bookies, and Fraud

Written by Jeff Nielson (Click for Original)




No one “understands” derivatives. How many times have readers heard that thought expressed (please round-off to the nearest thousand)? Why does no one understand derivatives? For many; the answer to that question is that they have simply been thinking too hard. For others, the answer is that they don’t “think”, at all.


The Derivatives Market: Bets, Bookies, and Fraud - Jeff Nielson



Derivatives are bets. This is not a metaphor, or analogy, or generalization. Derivatives are bets. Period. That’s all they ever were. That’s all they ever can be. This can be easily illustrated by simply examining and defining some of the more well-known “derivatives”, meaning those derivatives with whom everyone is familiar with their labels.

Let’s start with the two largest and most-important forms of this gambling (and fraud): “interest rate swaps” and “credit default swaps”. What is an interest rate swap? This is a bet between a banker (i.e. the people who control interest rates) and a Chump, on which direction an interest rate will move.

Can anyone see a problem with this form of gambling/fraud? Correct. If you place bets on the direction of interest rates against the criminals who control those interest rates, you’re probably going to lose on those bets, almost all of the time. Is this what we saw in the interest rate swap “market”?

Not at first. At first the Chumps were allowed to win – on their small bets. That’s how you gets lots and lots more Chumps to get suckered into the scam, and how you get the Chumps to place larger and larger bets. But after the initial “success” of the Chumps, it was lose, lose, lose.

Case in point, self-declared “economic genius”: Larry Summers, former Treasury Secretary of the United States, and at that time, President of Harvard. No one thinks that Larry Summers knows more about economics and finance than Larry Summers. So it should be no surprise that this “genius” decided to bet against his friends the bankers in financing Harvard’s debt, via interest rate swaps.

How did he do? Summers managed to lose nearly $1 billion in financing a mere $2 billion of debt. To be more precise, not only did Harvard pay the full rate of interest on their debt, but (thanks to Summers’ gambling) the university paid an additional $900+ million in “penalties” – to avoid losing even more moneyon Summer’s gambling.

That’s what happens when you bet on interest rates against the people who create those interest rates. It’s obvious fraud, and it has resulted in at least one jurisdiction filing criminal charges against three of the largest fraud-factories in this scam: JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank, and UBS. But that’s all “old news” now.

To really understand “the derivatives market” as a whole requires understanding exactly what it is: history’s largest book-making operation (i.e. bookies). This is all that this rigged casino has ever represented: bookies taking bets. Here readers also need to understand how a bookie’s “market” operates.

Bookies take bets according to “odds”, the prevailing gambling-ratio for that particular bet, or the price it costs to place that bet. But these odds change over time. How do they change? They change based on the amount of money placed on each side of the bet. When more money is placed on one side of the bet, the price to place the bet (on one side) declines, while the price to place the bet on the other side rises.

The gambling itself moves the market. The financial crime syndicate noticed how this gambling operated, and figured out how they could create their own “book-making operation”, where all the bets were rigged, and where these banksters were not only allowed to take bets (i.e. act as bookies), they would also be allowed to place bets, in this same market. All they had to do was to make-up a bunch of euphemisms to hide this systemic crime.

Here we see fraud in its most-elementary form. ‘Legitimate’ bookies never bet in their own “market”. Even in the world of quasi-illicit gambling, it is recognized that allowing this would allow bookies to rig their own gambling. But not in the world of “banking” and “derivatives”. Here the biggest bettors in this fraudulent gambling (by many orders of magnitude) are the bookies themselves.

Goldman Sachs -- $47.7 trillion

Bank of America -- $53 trillion

Citigroup -- $56 trillion

JPMorgan -- $78.1 million

This is totally illegal, in so many different ways. To begin with, most of these “derivatives” (i.e. bets) were illegal, until the Clinton regime obliterated most U.S. financial regulation, and simply stopped enforcing any laws that still remained on the books. This criminality was then rubber-stamped and extended by the subsequent Bush Jr. and Obama regimes.

Secondly, and as noted, there is only one “legal” limit for the amount of gambling that these bookies should be allowed to place in their own “market”: $0. But, of course, to penalize this illegality, you need to havelaws, and the derivatives fraud-market is totally lawless. How lawless? Not only are the bookies allowed to bet massively in their own casino, these bookies/gamblers/criminals are allowed to “regulate” their own casino.

When is a Crooked Casino not a “crooked casino”? When the crooks are also the cops.

Thirdly, it is massively illegal to see “concentration” to this degree in any market. Yet in the world of “banking” we see this crime syndicate with similar “concentrations” of its dirty money in virtually every nook-and-cranny of the financial world.

But we’ve still only barely begun to scratch the surface on this organized crime. This brings us to a second, and even more financially destructive form of illegal gambling: “credit default swaps”? What is a credit default swap? It is a bet placed on the odds that a particular nation (or corporation) will default on its debt.

This particular form of the bankers’ illegal gambling was outlawed for nearly 100 years (in the United States) based on anti-gambling statutes. It is now used by the banking crime syndicate to (literally) destroy the economies of entire nations.

What do we already know about book-making operations and “odds”? By massively piling your bets on one side of the ledger or the other, you move the market itself. How does this enable these financial terrorists to destroy the economies of nations? Simple.

What happens any/every time the banksters use their massive betting in the CDS market to “change the odds”, and thus move the market itself? The scam then moves onto the next tag-team partner: the Corporate media.

The Corporate media reports that the “odds” of a particular nation defaulting have suddenly soared or plunged. Does this mean anything? No, it means nothing at all other than the bets on one side have suddenly gotten extremely lop-sided. But that’s not what the Corporate media says.

What these stooges report is that the “risk” of a particular nation defaulting has suddenly soared or plunged. This is not the same thing. The “risk” that a nation will default is based upon the economic fundamentals of that nation – and not based merely upon the gigantic bets of known criminals.

However this media lie is then passed along to the next tag-team partner in this fraud/crime: the ratings agencies. These corrupt mouthpieces then “assess” this “news” from the Corporate media. And based upon the (supposed) “change in risk” – where nothing has “changed” at all except the bankers’ gambling – the credit rating agencies then assign higher or lower ratings, based upon the bankers’ original fraud in the derivatives market.

This moves interest rates. When these “official” ratings agencies change their “official” ratings, nations must pay either more interest or less interest on their debts. We saw the most obvious example of the bankers’ economic terrorism directed against Greece.

Using manipulation of the credit default swap market (and the lies of their accomplices), the banking crime syndicate drove the interest rate on Greek debt as high as 30%. To put this into perspective, in the equally bankrupt United States, the equally corrupt Federal Reserve has been too cowardly to raise the U.S. interest rate from 0% to 0.25% (despite seven years of promises)-- because it’s afraid this Ponzi-scheme economywould immediately implode.

What would happen to the United States if it had to pay 100 times more interest on its debts, like Greece? Ka-boom! And in less time than it takes to say “ka-boom.”

Having done a little bit to expose the overall fraud and criminality of these bets and the crime syndicate “bookies” themselves, these “derivatives” can now be discussed in a more familiar tone. What is a “gold derivative”? It’s a bet on the direction in which the price of gold will move.

What is a “silver derivative”? It’s a bet on the direction in which the price of silver will move. What is an “oil derivative” or “copper derivative” or “coal derivative”? Same thing. Yes, we can invent “gold derivatives” (or silver derivatives) which are different from this, just as we can devise/imagine different ways to bet on gold or silver.

The precise form of the bet is irrelevant. What is relevant is that merely through this crime syndicate placing its multi-trillion dollar bets in its own, rigged casino, these bets “influence” the corrupt markets of our ‘real’ world. Indeed, where does the word “derivative” come from? These are bets which (like all bets) are “derived” from the real world. Gamblers need something to bet on: a derivative.

Obviously one could write many books on the bankers’ assorted crimes in this “market”, and the refusal of our corrupt governments to interfere with this blatant criminality and market-rigging. However space is only available for one, further observation.

How corrupt, illegal, and utterly irredeemable is the fraudulent casino which the banksters call “the derivatives market”? When these criminals actually manage to lose on their own gambling (despite rigging these markets, themselves), they simply refuse to pay.

In the real world, any casino (legal or otherwise) which refused to pay when the “house” lost would quickly be driven out of business – one way or another. But we don’t live in the real world. Almost all of us live inthe Wonderland Matrix: a magical realm where “bookies” are allowed to place bets in their own book-making operations, there are no laws, and nothing ever has to make sense.




Please email with any questions about this article or precious metals HERE

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
ThePoliticalCom's picture

Great article from Jeff Nielson! I gave you a H/T in an article that I wrote at LinkedIn here:

Derivatives 101: Great Financial Tool Or Sinister Financial Time Bomb?


Radical Marijuana's picture

An excellent article ... other than when considering what it means that, metaphorically speaking, we have gone beyond the event horizon into a social black hole, which is like parasites killing their host, or like a metastasized cancer, which can no longer be treated without simultaneously killing the patient suffering from that.



The more one learns about that, the worse it gets, especially since the more one understands that, the more politically impossible it appears to do anything effective to either prevent or prepare for that situation continuing to get WORSE, FASTER ... with no end in sight of how much worse will become those vicious spirals of the political funding of governments enforcing frauds by privately controlled banks ???

While I totally agreed with the analysis of the article above, the only conclusions that one can then come to are that civilization has developed runaway criminal insanities, due to the excessive social successfulness of backing up legalized lies with legalized violence NOT having any feasible ways within those systems to stop that from automatically becoming MOAR PSYCHOTIC ...

GRDguy's picture

This is exactly why I'd been out of the system since 2005, but never had the ability to state the reasons so plainly. Well done, sir! All I could say was "the only way to win was not to play." 

danl62's picture

Kind of like going to the casino. You may win a pot or come out ahead on a weekend getaway. If you keep playing you are going to lose. Period. The odds are in favor of the house and the odds don't lie.

christiangustafson's picture

Sprott Resource Corp (SCP.TO)

In one year, from $2.57 to .62 today, or -75.9%

Down 88% off their 2011 high.  


Rhal's picture

If they felt the need to defend their position the article would have explained how Precious Metals derivatives have crushed the physical market. 

I don't blame Sprott for buying physical PMs on supply/demand fundamentals. Eventually, they must win. 

God only knows when though...

TwoHoot's picture

For commercial interests, derivatives are insurance, not bets.

For speculators, every "investment" is a bet because they have no commercial interest.

To understand derivatives, understand insurance under-writing, not finance.

sam site's picture



In 2008, the big Wall St banks like JP Morgan refused to pay losses on the insurance policies protecting buyers of  liar loan mortgages sold as stocks around the world. 

These insurance policies were derivatives and AIG was on the hook to pay out these losses and went bankrupt with the taxpayers picking up their liabilities. 

The Fed has been buying up and bailing out liar mortgages from their Wall St owner banks since 2008. 

You might point out that 80% of derivatives are interest rate "insurance" derivatives that protect adjustable rate loans against interest rate hikes. 

Like any insurance policy the borrower makes regular premium payments just like car insurance.  As you point out, the Fed guarantees there are no rate hikes and the borrowers have to

take out this useless insurance anyway and keep paying premiums for nothing.  That’s the derivative scam and how Wall St makes it money.

What's doubly illegal is that there is no pot of money in the bank to cover losses like State Farm Auto Insurance is required to have. 

There's only a margin loan with Treasury Bond collateral covering about 10% of the insurance policy.

This type of fraud is the primary reason why states have insurance commissions to protect the public, but not against Wall St fraud. 

That's why Wall St doesn’t use the word insurance and disguises it with swap.  Kind of like the deception of Federal Reserve instead of Private Banker Cabal or Central Bank.

All this fraud is the main reason why I'm betting that the dollar will eventually be abandoned. 

Cheaters never prosper in the long run.  There's a deceptive confidence and even arrogance in news, TV shows and movies that portrays America as a bastion of integrity and it's dollar and it’s culture will be dominant forever. 

But if you investigate below the surface you find the rampant fraud. 

 This is true not only in money but also in America’s food and medicine.  You will never convince the 95% of the public of this. 

This stubborn blind loyalty to the American cultural establishment is why so many American’s don’t protect themselves with gold and silver despite the overwhelming evidence of approaching global dollar rejection.


atoast2toast's picture

The BIS are slamming gold /
The FED are machine gunning the lifeboats /
The neo-nazi-neo-con-cabal has taken over the whitehouse /
There is only one true non - FIAT currency /

#GOLD #BITCHES !!!!!!!!!!!!

ThroxxOfVron's picture

IF the Derivative Contract made by a Bank takes precedent over Deposits in the event of insolvency then the Derivatives are effectively monetary emissions: printing.

Origination of LOANS at Commercial Banks require COLLATERAL.

Derivates are issued without COLLATERAL.

IF there is no COLLATERAL ASSET BACKING the Derivatives, be it an asset or revenue-steam/Bond: then these are not Loans or Swaps but COUNTERFEITING by Commercial Banks.

The FDIC has been instructed to pay Derivatives 'Claims' BEFORE Deposits in the event of Bank insolvencies.

Counterfeited Gambling Receipts have been given legal precedence over saved Capital Deposit Claims by the US Government.

Rhal's picture


I've read that also. It is completly insane that derivatives take senority over hard earned principal assets. Its the death-knell of the middle class. People should all be very aware of this.

arrowrod's picture


Who are the dummies that buy these "products"?

By the way, derivative mathematics are very complicated.

chomu's picture

Mostly their hedgie buddies gambling with Ma and Pa's pension, foundation, and endowment $$

Equalizer's picture

I think ill stick to trying to pick the winner of the Melbourne Cup then.

Rhal's picture

...and when you win, they actually do pay.