This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Bank Of England Tells British Banks To Reveal Their Full Exposure To Glencore And Other Commodity Traders

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Moments ago Glencore stock was halted after it tripped a circuit breaker to the upside, soaring 12% and more than doubling from its recent record lows...

... on overnight news the commodity trading giant would cut its zinc production by a third as well as lay off some 1,600 workers in Australia, in the process also sparking the biggest ever rally in the price of zinc.

Annual zinc output will fall by about 500,000 metric tons as Glencore suspends production at its Lady Loretta mine in Australia and at Iscaycruz in Peruit said Friday in a statement. It will also reduce output at McArthur River and the George Fisher mines, both also in Australia and some operations in Kazakhstan. The cuts are expected to result in about 1,600 job losses. Global zinc production was 13.3 million tons in 2014, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, making the reduction equivalent to almost 4 percent of world output.

Bloomberg notes that "as one of the world’s biggest suppliers of base metals such as copper, nickel and zinc, Glencore’s metals and minerals businesses delivered about 30 percent of its revenue last year. The shares jumped as much as 11 percent in London."

Analysts promptly cheered the move:

"Glencore is showing industry discipline by cutting unprofitable tons and saying it is worth more value to leave the tons in the ground,” Heath Jansen, a Citigroup Inc. analyst, wrote in a report Friday. “We expect assets to remain out of production until zinc prices improve materially and stay higher.

This cut is likely to be positive for the zinc market and should be supportive for the zinc price, and net-net likely to be positive for earnings through higher price rather than volume."

 

“Maybe they are the trailblazer, as there’s the specter of oversupply in many commodities,” James Wilson, a Morgans Financial Ltd. analyst, said by phone from Perth. “If you want higher prices for a commodity, you need to create price tension and to have less product in the market. Glencore’s doing that, though maybe under duress, and it’s something that other big companies should be thinking of.”

 

“The main reason for the reduction is to preserve the value of Glencore’s reserves in the ground at a time of low zinc and lead prices, which do not correctly value the scarce nature of our resources,” the company said. Glencore is “positive about the medium and long-term outlook for zinc, lead and silver prices.”

To be sure, the latest production cut is not the first for Glencore: the company has already curbed copper and coal supply as it navigates a collapse in raw materials that’s wiped $37 billion from its market value this year.

More importantly, as Citigroup further added the move is unlikely to affect analysts’ earnings estimates for the company or cash-flow forecasts as the operations are unprofitable at current prices.

Simply said, with sales a function of price and volume, and with Glencore aggressively cutting volumes, it is hoping the price increase will (more than) offset the drop in volumes. Which is a big gamble as other cash-strapped miners step up their own production, in the process boosting supply and once again slamming the price of zinc (and copper) lower.

It remains to be seen where the equilibrium price levels off after all these production cutbacks, although if the copper and zinc markets are anything like oil, it is certain that any volume reductions by Glencore will be promptly taken advantage of by Glencore's competitors, because in a global deleveraging and commodity supercycle repricing, he who cooperates while others defect, always loses the game theory.

Still, the basis of Glencore's thinking is probably something very different: as we noted earlier in the week, the company has had no problems approaching its banks with requests for further funding, requests which the banks promptly satisfied knowing that if Glencore fails, it may take all of them with it.

This is about to change.

As we reported two days ago, according to BofA analysts as a result of the dramatic collapse in GLEN equity prices and tumble in its bonds, coupled with the surge in its default risk, the company has quietly become a "systemic risk."

We laid out the conclusions as follows:

  • Comparisons are being made with some financially leveraged companies during the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC).
  • If credit is downgraded, banks could lower their exposure to Glencore both in terms of RCFs & LCs.
  • The high yield market is small and, our credit strategist thinks we might initially see temporary dislocations in a scenario in which GLEN were downgraded to junk.
  • Bank stress tests could start to include commodity trader distress. This could lead to less availability and more expensive bank funding of traders.

It was the last bullet point that was most important, and overnight we got confirmation that Glencore has indeed become a systemic risk from a regulatory standpoint after the FT reported that the Bank of England has asked British financial institutions to reveal their full exposure to commodity traders and falling prices of raw materials amid concerns over the impact of the oil and metals slump. Or, in other words, their exposure to Glencore, Trafigura, Vitol, Gunvor and Mecuria.

The Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority, which was set up in 2012 to ensure the “safety and soundness” of banks in the wake of the financial crisis, sent the requests to the UK’s big banks in the past week, according to three people with direct knowledge of the matter.

And just like that Glencore is in the same boat as China and Greece: the PRA move that mirrors similar inquiries it made earlier this year about the banks’ exposure to Greece and to China, was prompted by a sharp drop in the shares of Glencore, the biggest publicly listed trading-house-cum-miner at the start of last week.

The damage control came fast and furious, with the FT quickly adding that this demand for exposure "was not provoked by any immediate concerns of a default, a person familiar with the matter said, but it was checking that banks knew what their exposures were to individual commodity houses and that they had examined the wider knock-on effects if a large commodity trader was to collapse."

But wait, didn't a paid-to-scribe UofHouston "professor" recently claim that commodity traders were "not a systemic risk"? The Bank of England seems to disagree.

The FT also adds that "the PRA also wants to ensure banks — many of whom trade oil and metal themselves as well as financing commodity dealers and companies — are prepared in the event of a prolonged slowdown in the sector."

A person familiar with the move said: “This is not something we do every month, it is situation-specific,” adding it was a specific response to the recent share price moves of Glencore and other commodity trading houses.

Why is this a milestone development for Glencore? Because as BofA explained, now that Glencore is clearly in the central bank's microscope, banks will be much more careful about how much liquidity they provide the commodity-trader with $100 billion in counterparty exposure:

Recall from BofA:

GLEN had an unencumbered asset base of over US$90bn in property, plant, equipment and inventories at the half year. However, for bank investors and regulators, after the crisis, gross nominal exposure is a key metric – including committed facilities. We believe many banks may now be more carefully reviewing their exposure to the commodities complex. Glencore’s banks span the globe, with 60 in a recent financing. Glencore has stated it has locked its financing in for an extended period, but a desire to hedge would be powerful at the banks, as likely that regulators will include commodity and energy exposures in the next stress tests as it is a stated area of focus. These stress tests typically take gross exposures and assume elevated loss-given-default - a potential 5x capital uplift. A system positioned one-way on a credit has historically tended to keep spreads high; implying rising debt costs which are likely to put pressure on credit quality: convexity is alive and well.

What does this mean for Glencore, and its stakeholders? It means that today's rally is certainly welcome for a company which recently lost 80% of its post-IPO equity value. However, the long-term prospect remains nebulous, and as we said first in March of 2014, ultimately a bet on Glencore - in either direction - is a bet on China. If China fails to create a solid economic recovery, and push commodity prices higher, Glencore is merely buying time even as its cash flow dwindles, as its asset base shrinks and while what few unencumbered assets it has become encumbered with liens or are pledged, thus eliminating the company's ability to boost liquidity when it needs it most.

For now Glencore has avoided the worst, but now that it is a "systemic risk", should there be another major swoon lower in commodity prices, it may not be so lucky next time.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:01 | 6648595 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

The BOE is trying to figure out who is going to need a bail out before shit hit the fan.

 

Edit: Oh by the way, that 11% move to the upside is short covering not a sign that Glencore is okay you dumb fucks.

 

"The shares jumped as much as 11 percent in London". "Analysts promptly cheered the move"...., Idiots.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:10 | 6648684 junction
junction's picture

Why is the Bank of England protecting Stemcor, the mining giant owned by the Oppenheimer family?  Former PM Tony Blair is probably the person responsible, protecting MP Margaret Hodge  She should have been sent to prison in 1994 for her role in protecting the pedophile ring operating in the London Borough of Islington instead of going to Parliament.  Hodge is an Oppenheimer family member who backed Blair. 

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/04/16/uk-stemcor-restructuring-steel-...

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:20 | 6648731 y3maxx
y3maxx's picture

"Never again".....the famous statement by bankers...who, after the first and last bailout, would never allow another banker's ponzi scheme.

Well, it only took seven years to re occur.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:48 | 6648829 Dubaibanker
Dubaibanker's picture

Glencore has closed Dubai office.

https://www.difc.ae/glencore-investments-dubai-limited

Glencore has closed Singapore

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/glencore-to-close-down-sin...

Glencore has sold Nickel project for pennies in Brazil

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/28/us-horizonte-glencore-idUSKCN0...

Glencore has fired hundreds in Australia

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-09/glencore-slashes-queensland-jobs-n...

Glencore will fire thousands in Zambia and shut some operations

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/23/us-zambia-mining-glencore-idUS...

Glencore has closed a mine in South Africa and laid off hundreds

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/10/07/uk-glencore-safrica-idUKKCN0S11...

I have heard they fired hundreds in Zug...does anyone have a link?

Sat, 10/10/2015 - 05:27 | 6651888 unicorn
Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:52 | 6648846 Kayman
Kayman's picture

"The BOE is trying to figure out who is going to need a bail out before shit hit the fan."

More precisely, the BOE is trying to figure out how much money will be needed to stiff the taxpayers on behalf of their swill drinking friends.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 11:34 | 6649047 smacker
smacker's picture

Even more precisely, "the BOE is trying to figure out how much money will be needed to stiff bank depositors [...]."

Reason: UK banks now defined as "systemic" by the BoE last year are rescued by depositors, not taxpayers.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 09:52 | 6648597 TheGuru
TheGuru's picture

That was obvious.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 09:59 | 6648610 Hubbs
Hubbs's picture

You know, the central control imposed by the World Banks has gone so far that I would not be surprised if they and the govts coordinated  price controls on commodities-only this time to establish  a floor on prices!

 

I think Nixon tried price controls on the top side, to control inflation. That was back in the time when I was a kid making model airplanes. I recall an article about a kid who wrote the president protesting the increase in price on Testors Paint he used for his model airplanes from 15 cents a bottle to 20 cents, and Testors got busted!

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 09:57 | 6648624 Ban KKiller
Ban KKiller's picture

Is bullshit a commodity these days? Why, yes, it is! Now QUALITY bullshit is still a premium. For that you must seek out governments.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:05 | 6648656 Herdee
Herdee's picture

Obviously worried about leverage and derivative exposure.Must be concerned about comparisons to a certainn German bank with tens of trillions in derivatives.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:13 | 6648701 kliguy38
kliguy38's picture

Glencore was a massive Ponzi from the start and designed to fail. When it goes it will pull a 2 Trillion in derivatives down its rabbit hole. They know it and they're stalling for another bagman to take the derivatives. gl with that one.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:19 | 6648729 PaperBear
PaperBear's picture

Here comes a financial tsunami.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:22 | 6648741 venturen
venturen's picture

The need to start taking orders for printing money for those bankers that need rescuing!

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:30 | 6648769 Albertarocks
Albertarocks's picture

Oh this is going to go over well.  Let's watch the news to see how much this increases the rate of banker suicides.  Not that I care.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 12:07 | 6649220 Notbettyboop
Notbettyboop's picture

Hey Alberta,

Maybe one should care. As an expert who can read the signs.  Agreed that Glencore et al is a massive Ponzi scheme, and all the boys 'in the know' work it all out in Monaco during the Formula 1, or in the vip boxes during the champions football league, but they are real people over there. Not anybody's worth losing their lives over. Just saying.   

nbb

 

 

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 13:17 | 6649554 Albertarocks
Albertarocks's picture

Hi Notbettyboop.  Dick Cheney.  Donald Rumsfeld.  True, those two examples are not bankers.  But they are psychopathic mass murderers and therefore as bad as bankers.  Those are a couple of monsters the world could do without.   Just saying.

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:31 | 6648770 JailBanksters
JailBanksters's picture

First a warning shot across the bow about Glencore (a what if ....) and now banks told to check their sums and balances.

Somebody knows something is about to hit the fan

 

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:33 | 6648778 curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

How much you want to bet THOSEDEEPEST IN GLENCORE'S POCKETS HAVE BEEN SUPPORTING THE STOCK RUN?

Fri, 10/09/2015 - 12:52 | 6649448 Flying Wombat
Flying Wombat's picture

Discussing Deutsche Bank and Derivatives with Dave Kranzler - TF Metals Report

http://thenewsdoctors.com/?p=518147

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!