This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
"Carpe Chaos" - ISIS, Israel, Iraq, & Syria: It's All Part Of The Plan
Authored by Dan Sanchez, originally posted at AntiWar.com,
Israel lacks a national motto. If its leaders are looking for a Latin one, “carpe chaos” would be an apt and honest choice.
“Seize the chaos” is half of Israeli foreign policy in a nutshell (the other half being the instigation of that chaos in the first place). Indeed, even its friends in the media cannot help but put it in such terms. For example, The New York Times recently reported about the:
“…many Israeli leaders and thinkers seizing on the chaos in Syria to solidify Israel’s hold on Golan.”
This refers to the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in 1967 and has occupied ever since. Even the Israel-enabling United Nations considers that occupation and subsequent annexation to be unjust and illegal. Returning Golan to Syria has long been advanced as part of a potential peace deal.
But now, Israel is using the civil war in Syria as an excuse to expand settlements in the Golan Heights; a senior minister wants 100,000 new residents in the next five years. Its potential uses are manifold:
“The 400-plus square miles of the Israeli-controlled Golan on the northeast border with Syria is both strategic plateau and lush agricultural terrain yielding prize apples, cherries and beef. It is also a vast playground that drew 3 million tourist visits last year.”
This is Israel’s usual M.O. in the Palestinian West Bank as well: forging ahead with illicit settlements to establish “realities on the ground” that will be too intractable to reverse, thereby fixing the occupation permanently in place.
Advocates of the new Golan settlements defend them by citing the chaos in Syria:
“With Syria ‘disintegrating’ after years of civil war, they argue, it is hard to imagine a stable state to which the territory could be returned.”
The Times quotes Israeli MP Michael Oren who adds a blatant lebensraum argument to the case for good measure:
“We need places to build, and the world doesn’t want us to build in the West Bank. I don’t think anyone in the world can come at us and say we’re building on land that’s going to be part of a peace deal if we build on the Golan Heights.”
“Seize the chaos” is not a new doctrine: neither is it limited to Israeli halls of power. A veritable “carpe chaos” manifesto was written in 1996 for a Washington think tank by David Wurmser, an Israel-first neocon (but I repeat myself) who would later play a key role in the Bush administration’s drive to the Iraq War: advising Dick Cheney in the Vice President’s Office, assisting John Bolton at the State Department, and fabricating fanciful “connections” between Iraq and Al Qaeda at the Department of Defense.

David Wurmser
In “Coping with Crumbling States: A Western and Israeli Balance of Power Strategy for the Levant,” Wurmser made a case for “limiting and expediting the chaotic collapse” of the Baathist governments in Iraq and Syria.
Wurmser predicted that “Baathism’s days are numbered,” due to its own inherent failings as a stable basis for statehood. Indeed, he argued, Arab nationalism in general was unsuitable for the Arab people, given their particularist and tribal tendencies. Therefore, its adoption can only condemn Arab countries to forever “fluctuate between repression and anarchy.”
In particular, the Gulf War had “accelerated Iraq’s descent into internal chaos.” To Wurmser, this made the Middle East of 1996 resemble Europe of 1914. Just before World War I, the Ottoman Empire had long been dubbed “the sick man of Europe.” Its imminent demise was beyond doubt; what was in question was who would get to despoil its corpse.
In 1996 Iraq was “the sick man of the Middle East.” Wurmser predicted that, after the inevitable downfall of its ruler Saddam Hussein, Iraq would be dominated either by the Baathist regime in Syria or the “Hashemite” royal house in Jordan.
He characterized Iraq not as any serious threat to Israel or the West but as “the prize” in a Middle Eastern game of thrones:
“The prize itself is more powerful than any of the neighbors that covet it. Iraq, a nation of 18 million, occupies some of the most strategically important and well-endowed territories of the Middle East.”
Wurmser called for the West and Israel to help the Hashemite monarch of Jordan win this game of thrones by enthroning one of his kin as king of Iraq. He advanced what he termed Jordan’s “Hashemite option for Iraq” as a far superior alternative to a Syrian-dominated continuation of Baathist Arab nationalism. The former, he averred, is “more solid and traditional,” and:
“The Hashemites alone are adept enough in forging strong tribal, familial and clan alliances to create viable nations in the Levant.”
Of course Wurmser’s amateur sociological analysis is poppycock, and the real advantage the neocons saw in the “Hashemite option” was that the royal house of Jordan is obedient to Israel because it is a wholly-owned western client completely dependent on the hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign aid the US feeds it every year.
Indeed, Wurmser hinted at this real reason when he argued that, if Iraq were to go Hashemite:
“…then Syria would be isolated and surrounded by a new pro-western Jordanian-Israeli-Iraqi-Turkish bloc…”
Thus isolated, Baathist Syria’s own inevitable “chaotic collapse” could then be “expedited.” And the expanded pro-western bloc could:
“…contain and manage… the scope of the coming chaos in Iraq and most probably in Syria.”
This was the “balance of power strategy” Wurmser proposed for the West and Israel, to replace the despised:
“…quest for ‘comprehensive peace?—?including its ‘land for peace’ provision, with Syria.”
Nineteen years later, Wurmser must now be elated that the Golan Heights are, as discussed above, being taken off the table for any future “land for peace” deals thanks to his hoped-for chaotic collapse in Syria.
In fact, mere months before he wrote “Coping with Crumbling States,” Wurmser made the case for implacable antagonism toward Syria as a preferred alternative to returning Golan in particular:
“Given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan ‘comprehensive peace’ and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction program, and rejecting ‘land for peace’ deals on the Golan Heights.”
Wurmser wrote this in the infamous policy paper “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” which was addressed, not to Washington, but to Tel Aviv (indicating his true loyalties).
In “A Clean Break,” Wurmser even more expressly made the case for outright regime change in Iraq as a “means” of “weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria.” (This in turn was imperative because, “Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil.”)
“A Clean Break” was written under the auspices of a “study group” headed by Wurmser’s mentor Richard Perle and including fellow Perle-protege Douglas Feith. This is extremely significant because Perle and Feith, like Wurmser, also played key roles in the Bush administration’s war drive.
For more details on both the “Lebanese connection” mentioned above and the role of the “Clean Breakers” in starting the Iraq War, see my essay, “Clean Break to Dirty Wars.”
Indeed, it is Washington’s Israeli-occupied foreign policy that has enabled Israel’s “seize the chaos” doctrine by using America’s vast imperial might to create so much seizable chaos in the first place.
As it turned out, Iraq was not nearly as mired in mayhem or blundering toward the brink as Wurmser judged in 1996. At the dawn of the 21st century, Saddam was as firmly ensconced in power as ever. So much for Wurmser as a geopolitical analyst.
This posed a problem. There was no chance of “expediting” a “chaotic collapse” that wasn’t there; a process has to exist first before it can be accelerated. So Wurmser and the other neocons in the Bush administration had to cook up a collapse from scratch themselves.
And it took a full-scale invasion and occupation by a global superpower to make this particular Leninist “omelet,” at the cost of a prodigious amount of “broken eggs”: 4,425 American lives and $1.7 trillion.
But the neocons and Israel finally did get their longed for chaotic collapse in Iraq, along with the deaths of over a million Iraqis and the displacement of millions more. This blood-soaked business is what they call “statecraft.”
Yet, even then, the best laid plans of the neocons and Likudniks still completely failed to pan out.
In both of his seminal strategy documents of 1996, Wurmser imagined that if the Hashemites were installed in Iraq, they could use their influence with a certain prominent cleric there to turn the Shiites of Syria and Lebanon against Assad, Iran, and Hezbollah.
And the “Coping” report envisioned a supporting role in that project for Ahmed Chalabi, identified by Wurmser as “one of the most prominent of the Iraqi opposition figures to Saddam” and “himself a Shiite and a close, long-time Hashemite confidant.” Wurmser further anticipated that:
“…pro-Jordan Iraq Shiites as Ahmed Chalabi… would define the Iraqi Shiite community after Saddam’s removal.”
By the Iraq War, the neocons had given up on outright enthroning a Hashemite in Baghdad. It’s one thing to coordinate something like that from behind the scenes, but installing a royal despot through a high-profile American war would have made for unacceptably bad press for Washington.
So Perle and Company settled for a “democratic” “Hashemite option.” In this Plan B, “Hashemite confidant” Ahmed Chalabi graduated from a supporting to a leading role in Israel’s plan for the new Iraq.
Chalabi had long delighted the neocons by feeding Washington bogus “intelligence” on Iraqi weapons that eventually helped to justify the US invasion. On the basis of this rapport, Chalabi assured the neocons that, as a leading light in “democratic” Iraq, he would steer state policy in Israel’s favor. The neocons even swallowed his pledge to build a pipeline for them from Iraq’s oilfields to an Israeli refinery and port.
None of Chalabi’s promises ever manifested. As it turned out, Chalabi was just as much an agent of Iran (enemy to both Saddam and Israel) as he was a “Hashemite confidant.” For more details on this, see the amazing article, “How Ahmed Chalabi Conned the Neocons.”
The neocons and Israel got their war and collapse in Iraq, but it blew up in their faces. The new US-armed Iraqi government, as well as the Shiite militias that do most of its fighting, became dominated, not by loyal Jordan, but by hated Iran. Oops.
And after the war, the neocons were faced, not with Wurmser’s anticipated “Jordanian-Israeli-Iraqi-Turkish bloc,” but what they perceive as an anti-Israel “Shia crescent” including Iran, Iraq, Syria, and (most importantly) Hezbollah in Lebanon. Far from being isolated, Syria seemed to have more friends than ever. Oops.
But Israel sure as hell wasn’t going to leave bad enough alone. Where the subtleties of neocon “strategists” miserably failed, Israel’s influence over the sheer wealth and brute power of the US empire (what Wurmser has called its “raw capability”) would have to make up the difference once again.
So for the sake of Israel, and since at least 2007, Washington, along with its regional allies, has been waging a broad covert proxy war to undermine the “Shia crescent.” This policy pivot, which legendary journalist Seymour Hersh dubbed “The Redirection,” has involved supporting Sunni Islamist mujahideen in Lebanon, Syria, and Iran.
Then, after the 2011 “Arab Spring” of popular uprisings reached Syria, “The Redirection” went into overdrive. The US-led regional coalition (Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc) has been strenuously trying to overthrow the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad since at least 2012 by heavily sponsoring an insurgency led by jihadists including Al Qaeda and ISIS .
Israel has also been contributing to the cause of chaos more directly. Like a prizefighter’s “cutman,” the Israeli military has stood in Al Qaeda’s corner, taking in its wounded terrorist “rebels,” patching them up, and then sending them back into Syria to resume fighting.
In Syria too, the neocons and Israel have finally seen their longed for chaotic collapse, to the tune of a quarter of a million Syrian deaths and millions more displaced (many fleeing to Europe or drowning en route).
As discussed above, Israel has seized on the chaos it has unleashed on its northern neighbor as an excuse for expanding settlements in the Golan Heights.
Moreover, whenever that chaos even slightly spills over into Golan, Israel has been seizing that as a pretext for still more war.
Syrian soldiers are desperately battling Al Qaeda just north of Golan. Whenever a shell strays into the Heights (almost always exploding harmlessly in some unoccupied field), Israel responds by bombing Syrian military positions, thus effectively serving as Al Qaeda’s air force as well as its combat medic.
It does this regardless of (and generally clueless as to) who actually fired the offending projectile: whether it was the Syrian army, Al Qaeda, or any other faction. As CBS News related in a report of recent such strikes:
“Lt. Col. Peter Lerner, an Israeli military spokesman, said in a statement that Israel holds the Syrian military ‘responsible and accountable for any aggression emanating from Syria.’”
Israel’s self-righteously sociopathic behavior toward Syria and the Golan Heights beggars belief. It’s like some wealthy homeowner taking over his poor neighbor’s backyard and then sending a gang of crazed ruffians to invade his home. Then in the ensuing brawl, when something crashes through the neighbor’s window onto the seized yard, the land thief yells from a balcony, “Why can’t you get your house in order!” and fires at him with a shotgun. Then the thief walks back to his room muttering to himself, “What a hopeless basket case! How I’m definitely not giving him back his yard.”
What makes it especially incredible is that the ruffians in the real-life scenario are Al Qaeda and ISIS. But from the twisted perspective of Israel and the neocons, it makes perfect sense.
Even way back in 1996, Wurmser was already stressing in his “Coping” report that Arab nationalism must be considered enemy number one, and that Islamic fundamentalism was only a distant second.
Wurmser flat-out rejected any pragmatic detente with the Baathists, even for the sake of having a “bulwark” against the spread of radical Islam. He despised any such “peace process” as “prop[ping] up secular-Arab nationalism in its crumbling weakness.” He contended that such a policy is:
“…anchored to the belief that [secular-Arab nationalism] can be “reformed” enough to be resurrected as a bulwark against Islamic fundamentalism. Yet, one of the main strategic objectives of the peace process is to perpetuate Levantine secular-Arab nationalist regimes. Indeed, the previous Israeli government believed that, “[Israel’s] role is to protect the existingregimes, to prevent or halt the process of radicalization, and to block the expansion of fundamental religious zealotry.”
But the present study… shows that the pursuit of comprehensive peace and the effort to harness secular-Arab nationalist regimes such as Syria’s in the battle to stem the fundamentalist tide is not only futile. It is also a dangerous strategic misstep. ”
Wurmser argued that US support for secular Arab-nationalist Iraq in its brutal invasion of fundamentalist Iran in the 1980s was “an explosive mistake,” as Iraq’s subsequent “rogue” invasion of Kuwait demonstrated. And so:
“The same lesson should now be applied to Syria. It is in both Israel’s and the West’s interest to expedite the demise of secular-Arab nationalism. (…) The pursuit of the peace process is preventing this.”
Secular-Arab nationalism, Wurmser insisted, is nothing but an “obstacle” to introducing better defenses against and alternatives to fundamentalism, and to “more healthy future” for the Arab world.
“The West and its local friends must engage fundamentalism with better associates than Baathists.”
Such thinking would seem to explain the otherwise baffling tendency of today’s policy makers in Washington and Tel Aviv to stubbornly insist on the overthrow of one secular-Arab nationalist regime after another?—?Saddam in Iraq, Gaddafi in Libya, and now Assad in Syria?—?even though it invariably leads to explosive growth for extreme Islamist groups in membership, might, and conquests.
Yet, one would expect the 9/11 attacks to have pulled the rug out from under this rationale. Aren’t the 9/11 attacks why the US is raining bombs throughout the Muslim world in the first place? And secular-Arab nationalists didn’t knock down the Twin Towers; Islamic fundamentalists did.
Even ignoring the crucial issues of empire and blowback, and taking militaristic “offense as the best defense” premises for granted, shouldn’t Islamist terror organizations?—?which have actually attacked American cities?—?be menace number one, and secular-Arab nationalist states?—?which have never dared?—?be at most a distant second?
And so, especially after 9/11, wouldn’t creating “jihadist wonderlands” throughout the Middle East by decapitating the secular-Arab nationalist regimes that are the jihadists’ chief mortal enemies be the last thing our government should do? Especially when one of the groups thriving the most amid the chaos is Al Qaeda, the very perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks?
Not from Israel’s perspective. Michael Oren (the lebensraum-loving Israeli official mentioned above) has made it crystal clear that Wurmser’s priorities are still official state policy. In 2013, at the end of his tenure as Israeli ambassador to the US, Oren delivered this parting message through The Jerusalem Post:
“‘The initial message about the Syrian issue was that we always wanted [President] Bashar Assad to go, we always preferred the bad guys who weren’t backed by Iran to the bad guys who were backed by Iran,’ he said.
This was the case, he said, even if the other ‘bad guys’ were affiliated to al-Qaida.
‘We understand that they are pretty bad guys,’ he said, adding that this designation did not apply to everyone in the Syrian opposition. “Still, the greatest danger to Israel is by the strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut. And we saw the Assad regime as the keystone in that arc. That is a position we had well before the outbreak of hostilities in Syria. With the outbreak of hostilities we continued to want Assad to go.’”

Michael Oren
Then in 2014, just after ISIS advanced through Iraq to Mosul and declared itself a Caliphate, Oren said this regarding the conflict between the Shiite-led government of Syria and the Sunni extremists overrunning eastern Syria and western Iraq:
“From Israel’s perspective, if there’s got to be an evil that’s got to prevail, let the Sunni evil prevail.”
Lest he be misunderstood, by “Sunni evil” Oren is here specifically referring to ISIS. This is clear, because seconds before, he conveyed his recognition of the fact that they are indeed “bad guys” by referring to a specific mass-execution that ISIS had just committed.
That is Israel’s position. “Assad must go. We prefer Al Qaeda. Let ISIS prevail.”
In other words: “To hell with your towers, America. And your big city residents can go to hell too, where they can burn along with the Syrian victims of Al Qaeda and ISIS for all I care. Israel has its own regional strategic goals to think of. Now get back to work to pay your taxes so your government can keep decimating Muslim countries for me and my power clique and keep sending us billions of dollars in foreign aid.”
This from “America’s greatest friend in the Middle East.”
Israel would have preferred to have the Levant ruled by stable sock puppets of the West. But failing that, it would much rather be surrounded by an extremist-stricken Muslim maelstrom of mutual massacres than to have in its neighborhood even a single secular-Arab nationalist state with an independent rational leadership, a steady tax base, and a disciplined military.
And for 14 years, Washington has been adopting Israel’s perspective on this question with incredible fidelity. And as a recently-released government intelligence document revealed, it has done so knowing full well that it would likely result in the Levant being overrun by America-hating Islamic terrorists.
And thus it is demonstrated that the only enemy of the American people greater than Israel’s government is our own.
David Wurmser warned that if the West did not adopt his warlike strategic vision, it:
“…will still not get peace. Instead it will look beyond Israel’s borders at secular-Arab nationalism’s final legacy: a chaotic sea… (which will painfully intrude on the West)…”
The West has indeed adopted the neocon/Israeli strategy, precipitating the “chaotic collapse” of secular-Arab nationalism in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. But the chaos has not been “contained and managed” as Wurmser anticipated. Neither has it cleared the way for “a more healthy future” as he promised.
Instead it has created exactly what Wurmser said it would prevent: a “chaotic sea” immersing the entire Middle East and “painfully intrud[ing] on the West.” That chaotic sea is even lapping up onto the shores of Europe in the form of the refugee crisis.
And now that Russia has been drawn into the Syrian war, where its bombers and troops operate at cross purposes with American bombers and proxy fighters, the chaotic sea threatens to become a thermonuclear lake of fire engulfing the whole world.
Israel may eventually see every secular-Arab nationalist regime that defies it fall. It may yet see Assad die in some humiliating way, just as it saw Saddam hanged before a jeering crowd and Gaddafi sodomized in the street. It may also finally see American bombs raining down on Tehran.
Israeli troops may once again march upon Beirut, and this time see every important member of Hezbollah executed or buried under a prison. (It’s extremely unlikely, but it’s conceivable.) It may then have total sway over Lebanon and untrammeled access to all its natural resources (including the coveted Litani River).
Israel may never have to give the Palestinians freedom, restitution, or peace. And it may never have to give up any of its territorial spoils of war: the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, or the Golan Heights. Golan’s “places to build,” its “strategic plateau,” its “prize apples,” and its “vast playground” spaces may be Israel’s until the end of mankind.
But if that end is a decade from now?—?or a day?—?will it really be worth it?
- 73452 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


The increasingly venomous anti-semitism (anti jewish, anti israel, anti zionism) on this website saddens me. I have been here for many years. I have read this website because of its intelligent penetrating journalism and its intelligent commenters. I have read this website for its exposure of the FRAUD which controls the Western world. I am not PC and do not hesitate, and am not afraid to call a spade a spade. I am aware of the damning generalizations which can accurately be made about the jews, the english, the americans, the germans, the japanese, the vatican.....and many other classes of people, i do not believe that this sectarian venom advances the cause of freedom, liberty, and justice. I believe that these anti-ism's are tools of the statist. These ideas are for the simpleton. It is my wish that the Zerohedge community would return to the freedom loving libertarian quest to expose the crimes of high finance. It is my wish that the Zerohedge community would shun the tools of the oligarchy who seek to discredit, undermine, or subvert this website for their own power hungry quest. Shame, blame, stereotypes, identity politics and hatred are their tools. Zerohedge is about knowledge, education, and enlightenment. Gutenberg freed the world with the printing press, the internet and Zerohedge can free it again if we do not fall victim to the Goebelesque haters seeking to destroy our mission. Please shun the enemies of freedom even if they touch upon your tribal instincts. Those same instincts give direct rise to what evils most of us here came to oppose. Rise up zerohedgers and restore our community.
It's not incidental that all the members of PNAC are dual citizens or Israelis. And it's not incidental that that they've managed to harness American foreign policy objectives to suit their own goals. If it were a gang of Koreans embedded deep within the structure of our national security apparatus they'd be the target.
This isn't about Jews. This is about psychopath deviants attempting to circumvent lawful government. Fuck all tyrants.
There's a difference between talking about the people and their beliefs of a country, vs the policies and actions of the government of a country.
As a US citizen, I hope people around the world can see that.
Admit it.
“Anti-semitism, It’s a trick we always use it”- Israeli Minister on NPR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0kWAqZxJVE
By way of deception
nati-semitism = anti-Jewish, anti-Israel, anti-Zionist...
That pretty much sums it up, motherfucker, doesn't it? I am anti-semitic if I criticise Israel (an illegal state carved from the land and bodies of a defenseless people in violation of UN directives and human conscience). I am anti-semitic if I criticse Zionists (a global political movement based on racist Jewish Supremacy).
And let's just put the cards on the table, eh? I am anti-semitic because I believe that the Jewish paople are dominated by a small number of genetically damaged people characterised by deep paranoia, incorrigible narcissism, hatred of all non-Jews and hungry for power and riches to the point that no human life is too important and no immoral act is too low to execute to that end. Yes, the Jewish people have made great contributions to further mankind, but these few have tarnished and negated their portion.
Usury is a Jew invention. They started back in biblical times. The MONEY CHANGERS were thrown out of the temple. They were kikes. Even the Magna Carta provided protections against usury and the kikes were doing the same shit back then. Shakespeare did NOT write the "Merchant of Venice" on a whim... it was based on the common kike practices of the day. They were discriminated against because back then they were the same slime they are today....
This is history folks.
If you want to open your eyes as to why our stable society has been turned upside down, read this entire post to get some of the dots to connect the big picture as to what is really happening. These are all FACTS.
They have been ejected over 100 times from other countries for doing exactly what they are doing to this country. For meddling in the affairs of stable societies and defrauding stable governments for the last 1500 years.
Less than 2% of the population control or influence everything you think and do. It is ***NOT*** because they are smarter, they have a plan to exploit the goy worldwide (NWO) and use money and family names to be well connected and manipulative.
They have deceptively used your own religion (and god which they do not believe in) to brainwash you into revering them.
They are NOT your friends, as taken from one of their own websites....
----->> http://www.aishdas.org/avodah/faxes/mmOnNachriim.pdf <<-----
"If a Jew is chasing a gentile in order to murder him, it is forbidden to kill the Jew in
order to save the gentile, even if there is no other way to save the gentile's life. A
person who kills the Jewish pursuer in order to save the gentile's life must be put to
death. But if a gentile (or a Jew) is chasing a Jew in order to murder him, one must
kill the pursuer in order to save the pursued person (if there is no other way to save
his life). This law applies to a ger toshav as well.
Sources:
Minchat Chinuch commandment 600"
"2.2) in a commercial transaction, if a Jew charges an exorbitant price or conceals the
low quality of the goods from a gentile customer he does not owe the gentile any
compensation (as he would owe a Jewish customer). According to some opinions, it
appears that this law is not applied to a ger toshav; it is forbidden to cheat him and
therefore he must be compensated if he is cheated. In any case, it is clear that if a
gentile charges an exorbitant price or conceals the low quality of the goods from a
Jewish customer, he owes the Jew compensation.
Sources:
Babylonian Talmud Tractate Bechorot 13b
Maimonides, Laws of Sales 13:7
Tur Choshen Mishpat 227:30
Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat 227:26
Minor Tractates, Tractate Gerim chapter 3
Palestinian Talmud Tractate Yevamot chapter 8 8d:1"
"2.3) When a Jew owes money to a gentile who has passed away, the Jew is not obliged
to repay the debt to the heirs, provided the latter do not know about the debt. If the
heirs ask the Jew whether he owed money to the deceased, it is even permissible to lie
to them and deny the debt (provided the Jew knows for sure that they do not know
about the debt, so that the name of G-d will not be profaned by his lie).
Sources:
Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat 283:1
Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 182:4 (uncensored edition included on the DBS version 9 CD)"
There are many more enlightening things on that PDF file for you (the GOYIM) to read
Read ALL of it to understand how deceptive and knifing they really are.
WHO CONTROLS THE U.S.A.
List Summaries
INTERNET
Who Controls E-Bay?
Summary:
Of the nine (9) eBay executives, six (6) are Jews. This is a numerical
representation of 67%. Of the eleven (11) eBay directors, two (2) are
Jews. This is a numerical representation of 18%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the eBay executives by a factor of 33.5 times(3,350 percent) and over-represented among the eBay directors by a factor of 9 times(900 percent).
Who Controls Apple?
Summary:
Of the ten (10) Apple executives, three (3) are Jews. This is a numerical
representation of 30%. Of the eight (8) Apple directors, five (5) are
Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 63%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Apple executives by a factor of 15 times(1,500 percent) and over-represented among the Apple directors by a factor of 31.5 times(3,150 percent).
Who Controls Yahoo?
Summary:
Of the thirteen (13) Yahoo! executives, eight (8) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 62%. Of the eleven (11) Yahoo! directors, five (5) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 45%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Yahoo! executives by a factor of 31 times(3,100 percent) and over-represented among the Yahoo! directors by a factor of 22.5 times(2,250 percent).
Who Controls Google?
Summary:
Of the six (6) Google executives, four (4) are Jews or have Jewish
spouses. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Of the ten (10)
Google directors, four (4) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a
numerical representation of 40%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Google executives by a factor of 33.5 times(3,350 percent) Andover-represented among the Google directors by a factor of 20 times(2,000 percent).
Who Controls Amazon?
Summary:
Of the eleven (11) Amazon.com executives, eight (8) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 73%. Of the nine (9) Amazon.com directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the Amazon.com executives by a factor of 36.5 times(3,650 percent)and over-represented among the Amazon.com directors by a factor of 33.5times(3,350 percent).
Who Controls Facebook?
Summary:
Of the three (3) Facebook executives, three (3) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 100%. Of the seven (7) Facebook directors,
four (4) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of
57%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Facebook executives by a factor of 50 times(5,000 percent) and over-represented among the Facebook directors by a factor of 28.5 times(2,850 percent).
THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965 with the signing of the Open Immigration Law Of 1965.While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law Of 1965 was the beginning of America as death as a unified nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and bribing" the law into existence with the fanaticism equaling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.
Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American Christian
culture in their aggressive efforts to change it.
The Open Immigration Law Of 1965 is a prime example of that hostility. A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJ Congress:
Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a
progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism."
Here Are the Names of the Jewish people Behind the Open Immigration Law of 1965:
1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign
Relations)* Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled 'Let us open the gates' that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 peryear for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the "Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill, the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.* Leo Pfeffer, wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open immigration.* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish neo-con, also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
* Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the Bnai Brith, (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.
Most of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Western Civ. Within the context of a Jewish-informed "multicultural America," these immigrants are encouraged
by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.
Who Controls Microsoft?
Summary:
Of the seventeen (17) Microsoft executives, six (6) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 35%. Of the nine (9) Microsoft directors,
five (5) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 56%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are
over-represented among the Microsoft executives by a factor of 17.5
times (1,750 percent) and over-represented among the Microsoft directors by a factor of 28 times(2,800 percent).
Who Controls Wikimedia?
Summary:
Of the seventeen (17) Wikimedia senior staff and trustees, five (5) are
Jews. This is a numerical representation of 29%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Wikimedia senior staff and trustees by a factor of 14.5 times (1,450 percent).
MEDIA
Who Controls Big Media?
Summary:
Of the twelve (12) senior executives of the "Big Six" media
corporations, nine (9) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a
numerical representation of 75%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the "Big Six" media corporations by a factor of 37.5 times (3,750 percent).
Who Controls Hollywood?
Summary:
Of the sixty (60) senior executives of the major Hollywood studios,
trade unions, and talent agencies, fifty (50) are Jews or have Jewish
spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies by a factor of 41.5times (4,150 percent).
Who Controls Television?
Summary:
Of the sixty-four (64) senior executives of the major television
broadcast networks, cable networks, and production companies,
fifty-seven (57) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 89%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks, and production companies by a factor of 44.5 times (4,450percent).
Who Controls Music?
Summary:
Of the fifty (50) senior executives of the major music labels and trade
organizations, thirty-nine (39) are Jews. This is a numerical
representation of 78%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior
executives of the major music labels and trade organizations by a factor of 39 times (3,900 percent).
Who Controls Radio?
Summary:
Of the forty-six (46) senior executives of the major radio broadcast
networks and station owners, twenty-eight (28) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 61%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners by factor of 30.5 times (3,050 percent).
Who Controls Advertising?
Summary:
Of the forty-six (46) senior executives of the major advertising
corporations and trade associations, thirty-one (31) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major advertising corporations and trade associations by a factor of 33.5 times (3,350 percent).
Who Controls the News? (Part 1)
Summary:
Of the sixty-seven (67) senior executives of the major television and
radio news networks, forty-seven (47) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 70%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major television and radio news networks by a factor of 35 times(3,500 percent).
Who Controls the News? (Part 2)
Summary:
Of the sixty-five (65) senior executives of the major newspapers and
news magazines, forty-two (42) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines by a factor of 32.5 times (3,250 percent).
BANKING
Who Controls the Economy?
Summary:
Of the sixty (60) senior officials of the U.S. Government economic,
financial, and monetary institutions, thirty-nine (39) are Jews or have
Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior officials of the U.S. Government economic, financial, and monetary institutions by a factor of32.5 times(3,250 percent).
Who Controls Wall Street? (Part 1)
Summary:
Of the fifty-one (51) senior executives of the major Wall Street banks,
trade exchanges, and regulatory agencies, thirty-seven (37) are Jews or
have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 72%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street banks, trade exchanges, and regulatory agencies by a factor of 36 times(3,600 percent).
Who Controls Wall Street? (Part 2)
Summary:
Of the forty (40) senior executives of the major Wall Street mutual
funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and brokerages, twenty-six (26) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street mutual funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and brokerages by a factor of 32.5 times(3,250 percent).
Who Controls Goldman Sachs?
Summary:
Of the nine (9) Goldman Sachs executives, seven (7) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 78%. Of the twelve (12) Goldman Sachs
directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 50%. Of the thirty-three (33) Goldman Sachs management committee members, twenty (20) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 61%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Goldman Sachs executives by a factor of 39 times(3,900 percent), over-represented among the Goldman Sachs directors by a factor of 25 times(2,500 percent), and over-represented on the Goldman Sachs management committee by a factor of 30.5 times(3,050 percent).
Who Controls JPMorgan Chase?
Summary:
Of the ten (10) JPMorgan Chase Operating Committee members, nine are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 90%. Of the eleven (11) JPMorgan Chase directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 45%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the JPMorgan Chase Operating Committee members by a factor of 45 times(4,500 percent) and over-represented among the JPMorgan Chase directors by a factor of 22.5 times(2,250 percent).
Who Controls American International Group?
Summary:
Of the sixteen (16) directors and trustees of American International
Group, twelve (12) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 75%.
Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the directors and trustees of American
International Group by a factor of 37.5 times (3,750 percent).
Who Controls the Treasury Department?
Summary:
Of the twenty-six (26) U.S. Treasury Department senior officials,
eighteen (18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 69%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the U.S. Treasury Department senior officials by a factor of 34.5 times (3,450 percent).
Who Controls the Federal Reserve System?
Summary:
Of the seven (7) Federal Reserve Board governors, four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Of the twelve (12) Federal Reserve District Bank presidents, four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical
representation of 33%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by a factor of 28.5 times (2,850 percent), and over-represented among the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents by a factor of 16.5 times(1,650 percent).
GOVERNMENT
Who Controls the White House?
Summary:
Of the eleven (11) current and former senior advisors of President
Barack Obama, nine (9) are Jews, partial Jews, or have Jewish spouses.
This is a numerical representation of 82%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are
over-represented among the current and former senior advisors of
President Barack Obama by a factor of 41 times (4,100 percent).
Who Controls the Senate?
Summary:
Of the twenty (20) U.S. Senate Committee chairmen, eight (8) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 40%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are
over-represented among the U.S. Senate Committee chairmen by a factor of 20 times (2,000 percent).
Who Controls the Congress?
Summary:
Of the forty-two (42) U.S. House Committee chairmen and ranking members, six (6) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 14%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. House Committee chairmen and ranking
members by a factor of 7 times (700 percent).
Who Controls the Supreme Court?
Summary:
Of the nine (9) U.S. Supreme Court justices, four (4) are Jews or partial
Jews. This is a numerical representation of 44%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Supreme Court justices by a factor of 22 times (2,200 percent).
Who Controls the State Department?
Summary:
Of the seventy-four (74) U.S. State Department senior officials,
forty (40) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 54%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the U.S. State Department senior officials by a factor of 27
times (2,700 percent).
Who Controls the Justice Department?
Summary:
Of the forty-seven (47) U.S. Justice Department senior officials,
twenty-two (22) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 47%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the U.S. Justice Department senior officials by a factor of 23.5
times(2,350 percent).
Who Controls the Defense Department?
Summary:
Of the one-hundred eleven (111) U.S. Defense Department senior
officials, forty (40) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a
numerical representation of 36%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Defense Department senior officials by a factor of 18 times (1,800 percent).
Who Controls the Treasury Department?
Summary:
Of the twenty-six (26) U.S. Treasury Department senior officials,
eighteen (18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 69%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the U.S. Treasury Department senior officials by a factor of 34.5 times (3,450 percent).
GLOBALISM
Who Controls the Group of Thirty?
Summary:
Of the forty-three (43) Group of Thirty members, twenty-three (23) are
Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 53%. Jews are approximately .25% of the world population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Group of Thirty members by a factor of 212 times (21,200 percent).
Who Controls the Bilderberg Group?
Summary:
Of the thirty-five (35) Bilberberg Steering Committee members,
sixteen (16) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 46%. Jews are approximately 1% of the population of
the Western world.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are
over-represented on the Bilberberg Steering Committee by a factor of 46 times (4,600 percent).
Who Controls the Trilateral Commission?
Summary:
Of the fifty-six (56) Trilateral Commission Executive Committee members, twenty-three (23) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 41%. Jews are approximately .25% of the world population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented on the Trilateral Commission Executive Committee by a factor of 164 times (16,400 percent).
Who Controls the Council on Foreign Relations? (Part 1)
Summary:
Of the forty-three (43) Council on Foreign Relations directors,
twenty-eight (28) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the Council on Foreign Relations directors by a factor of 32.5
times (3,250 percent).
Who Controls the Council on Foreign Relations? (Part 2)
Summary:
Of the fifty-five (55) Council on Foreign Relations think tank members,
thirty-one (31) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 56%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented in the Council on Foreign Relations think tank by a factor of 28 times(2,800 percent).
SOCIETY
Who Controls the Ivy League?
Summary:
Of the twenty-four (24) senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities, twenty (20) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities by a factor of 41.5 times (4,150 percent).
Who Controls the Think Tanks?
Summary:
Of the thirty (30) senior executives of the major think tanks,
eighteen (18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 60%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the senior executives of the major think tanks by a factor of 30
times (3,000 percent).
Who Controls Professional Sports?
Summary:
Of the sixty (60) senior executives of the major sports leagues, talent
agencies, and media outlets, forty-three (43) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 72%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major sports leagues, talent agencies, and media outlets by a factor of 36 times (3,600 percent).
Who Controls the Anti-Defamation League?
Summary:
Of the fifty-three (53) executives and directors of the Anti-Defamation
League, fifty-three (53) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of
100%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives and directors of the Anti-Defamation League by a factor of 50 times (5,000 percent).
Who Controls the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Summary:
Of the twenty-two (22) Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff members, fifteen (15) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 68%. Of the thirteen (13) Southern Poverty Law Center directors, eight (8) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 62%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff members by a factor of 34 times(3,400 percent), and over-represented among the Southern Poverty Law Center directors by a factor of 31 times(3,100 percent).
Who Controls the American Civil Liberties Union?
Summary:
Of the nine (9) executives of the American Civil Liberties Union,
four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 44%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the executives of the American Civil Liberties Union by a factor of 22 times (2,200 percent).
Who Controls the Defense Policy Board?
Summary:
Of the twenty-two (22) Defense Policy Board members, fourteen (14) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 64%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Defense Policy Board members by a factor of 32 times (3,200 percent).
The Jews have mostly been parasites in every host nation kind enough to take them in.
They always use their money to take over the banking industry of that nation, then start buying all the politicians with their ill-gotten gains.
Then they start pornography, and homosexuality.
Then they take over the main stream media, education, and newspapers until degradation brings that nation to its knees. and
collapse sets in.
Jewish Bankers and Speculation people destroy/enslave the world.
The ownership of the 10 major Central banks are:
1. Rothschild Bank of London
2. Warburg Bank of Hamburg
3. Rothschild Bank of Berlin
4. Lehman Brothers of New York
5. Lazar Brothers of Paris
6. Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York (Now Shearson American Express)
7. Israel Moses Serif Banks of Italy
8. Goldman, Sachs of New York
9. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
10. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is centrally controlled by Nathan M. Rothschild & Sons of London.
The names of these banks, except Chase Manhattan-Rockefellers,
are all obviously Jewish names and the Rothschild name was originally Bauer.
It is easier for a camel to walk through the eye of a needle, than a rich person to go to heaven.
" It is my wish that the Zerohedge community would return to the freedom loving libertarian quest to expose the crimes of high finance."
And they're to do that without mentioning the Tribe's machinations? Good luck with that.
If you're an average Israeli citizen at odds with your Zionist government's belligerent policies its long past due to reconsider staying in Israel. After 60+ years of playing rough with the neighbors I'm afraid the Zionists have worn out their welcome.
Israel is one suitcase nuke away from oblivion. And all the false flag operations and illegal assassinations and Mossad operations in the world are only making that inevitability more likely.
Dear Mossad,
... They that plow iniquity, and sow wickedness, reap the same.
Or, as we like to say back in day, what goes around comes around... motherfuckers.
One nuke suitcase?!? Is there a fund I can contribute to?!??!?!?
If Israel's looking for a national slogan, I'd suggest:
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Jewish Children
How Israel accomplishes this is up to them. Against infidels or against each other, Muslims fight with no holds barred, and if you impose any rules of engagement on your soldiers, the Muslims are going to exploit those rules and win.
Actually, Muslims historically have fought with ethical restraint. Killing of women, children, elderly and priests and monks of other religions was prohibited in Islamic law, a rule that ws followed with pride by Muslims who refused to descend to thd "kill everyone and let God decide" mindset of the Christians of the tme. When Saladin took control over Jerusalem from the Cruaders, he spared the Christian population, even though the Crusaders had massacred ever man, woman and child when they won (including the Arab Christians of Jerusalem, as well as is its entire Jewish population).
Here are the instructions given to the Muslim warriors fighting the Byzantines by the first caliph Abu Bakr, the Prophet's succesor:
"Do not be deserters, nor be guilty of disobedience. Do not kill an old man, a woman or a child. Do not injure date palms and do not cut down fruit trees. Do not slaughter any sheep or cows or camels except for food. You will encounter persons who spend their lives in monasteries. Leave them alone and do not molest them."
http://www.iisna.com/articles/biographies/the-first-caliph-abu-bakr-632-...
Prophet Muhammad structly forbade the killing of women and children in multiple hadiths:
Saheeh Bukhari
Volume 004, Book 052, Hadith Number 257.
Narrated By 'Abdullah : During some of the Ghazawat of the Prophet a woman was found killed. Allah's Apostle disapproved the killing of women and children.
Volume 004, Book 052, Hadith Number 258.
Narrated By Ibn 'Umar : During some of the Ghazawat of Allah's Apostle a woman was found killed, so Allah's Apostle forbade the killing of women and children.
Saheeh Muslim
Book 019, Hadith Number 4319.
Chapter : Prohibition of killing women and children in war.
It is narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that a woman was found killed in one of the battles fought by the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him). He disapproved of the killing of women and children.
Book 019, Hadith Number 4320.
Chapter : Prohibition of killing women and children in war.
It is narrated by Ibn 'Umar that a woman was found killed in one of these battles; so the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) forbade the killing of women and children.
Sunan Abu Dawood
Book 008, Hadith Number 2663.
------------------------------
Chapter : Not known.
Narated By Rabah ibn Rabi' : When we were with the Apostle of Allah (pbuh) on an expedition, he saw some people collected together over something and sent a man and said: See, what are these people collected around? He then came and said: They are round a woman who has been killed. He said: This is not one with whom fighting should have taken place. Khalid ibn al-Walid was in charge of the van; so he sent a man and said: Tell Khalid not to kill a woman or a hired servant.
Maliks Muwatta
Book 021, Hadith Number 008.
Section : Prohibition against Killing Women and Children in Military Expeditions.
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab that a son of Kab ibn Malik (Malik believed that ibn Shihab said it was Abd ar-Rahman ibn Kab) said, "The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade those who fought ibn Abi Huqayq (a treacherous jew from Madina) to kill women and children. He said that one of the men fighting had said, 'The wife of ibn Abi Huqayq began screaming and I repeatedly raised my sword against her. Then I would remember the prohibition of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, so I would stop. Had it not been for that, we would have been rid of her.'"
Book 021, Hadith Number 009.
Section : Prohibition against Killing Women and Children in Military Expeditions.
Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi from Ibn Umar that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, saw the corpse of a woman who had been slain in one of the raids, and he disapproved of it and forbade the killing of women and children.
Book 021, Hadith Number 010.
Section : Prohibition against Killing Women and Children in Military Expeditions.
Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya ibn Said that Abu Bakr as-Siddiq was sending armies to ash-Sham. He went for a walk with Yazid ibn Abi Sufyan who was the commander of one of the battalions. It is claimed that Yazid said to Abu Bakr, "Will you ride or shall I get down?" Abu Bakrsaid, "I will not ride and you will not get down. I intend these steps of mine to be in the way of Allah."
Then Abu Bakr advised Yazid, "You will find a people who claim to have totally given themselves to Allah. Leave them to what they claim to have given themselves. You will find a people who have shaved the middle of their heads, strike what they have shaved with the sword.
"I advise you ten things| Do not kill women or children or an aged, infirm person. Do not cut down fruit-bearing trees. Do not destroy an inhabited place. Do not slaughter sheep or camels except for food. Do not burn bees and do not scatter them. Do not steal from the booty, and do not be cowardly."
The modern forms of extremism you see in these so-called Islamist groups like ISIS have no basis in traditional Islamic law or historical practice. The deeper you look into the origins of this kind of extremism, especially the mondern Wahhabi death cult, you will find that these are groups have been financed by Western interests seeking not only to get Muslims to kill each other, but to erase the traditional ethical teacings of Islam so that the religion could be undermined and taken over by its enemies.
So Saladin...I think any rational thinking person can recognize a man's quality of character (for the times he lived in)...who achieved many things off the battlefield but let's not forget, he owed his power & wealth to the point of his sword.
His allowing unmolested pilgrimage by Christians to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre after his conquest of Jerusalem was a negotiated charitable act and should be viewed as such, however it had been rebuilt because of past Muslim conquests.
The Hindu's (not done by Saladin) were...not so fortunate ;-)
http://www.stephen-knapp.com/islamic_destruction_of_hindu_temples.htm
Regardless of history, the "modern Wahhabi death cult" is the enemy that all non-Muslims and many Muslims must deal with today. When the barbarian won't abide by your rules, you must abide by his rule: might makes right.
Jim Donald explains what happened to Islam: After its old hereditary kings and caliphs were overthrown, superior holiness became the only path to power. As with the the French and various Communist revolutions, this leads to a spiral of ever-increasing insanity, where moderates support extremists out of piety, and extremists purge moderates out of piety.
"How Israel accomplishes this is up to them. "
Fine if they went about it on their own. Problem is they get the goyim to do their fighting for them and pay for the priverlage. That's what I have a problem with.
greater israel in construction zionism and jew world order only in the beginning of its bloom
"zionism and jew world order only in the beginning of its deep cancerous rot over the face of the earth...."
There - fixed it for you... ;-)
Nothing would hasten in a unified tyrannical world government, the wet dream of the super-oligarch, as the complete and utter wiping off the map of the thing called Israel. With that one stone you could dissolve the three major religions and unify the dominant land mass. Nobody smart enough to figure this out, don't count on it.
Think about what you done, and how you've set yourselves up, who's the real putz about to be the burnt offering this time. Some beings just can't ever learn, or escape their past, it's what they are. Live it up while your on top, tick tock.
Zero Hedge finally addresses the 800 pound gorilla directly, as opposed to country #4 in a long list. Well done! http://winteractionables.com/?p=26069
Let me figure this out.....support a people that advances the human race in areas such as advanced technology, medicine, women equality, education or a people that support education as nothing more than religious education, treat women like cattle, cut off heads and hands, and generally 1000 years behind in knowledge. Gosh, so difficult. I choose the civilized man over the barbarian. I suspect that all of us will have to choose which side we are on shortly.
lol..jews have done more damage to the world than any muslim could ever wish.
nice try hasbara troll.
jews get kicked out of every country they ever lived in ...
I suspect that all of us will have to choose which side we are on shortly.
Mine was made a long time ago MF
at teh cost of monetary enslavement, Judaistic amorality, spiritual and cultural decline, living under harsh, racist Jewish Supremacism...
No thanks....If Judaic Talmudism ever prevails, it will be a dark, dark day for all of mankind....
I submit that the author of this article sees what he believes, not what is real, and is certifiably insane. Or maybe just bigoted and, like legions of anti-semites before him, peddles worthless conspiracy theories in order to vent his hatred. A total prick either way.
So you have no rational retort to his argument? Only ad homenims? Typical Hasbara....
Jewish behavior has nothing to do with anti-semitism
I would submit that Jewish behaviour has everything to do with anti-Semitism
Anti-Semitism IS a disease, you catch it from exposure to filthy, evil Jews! It's hard to imagine anyone more repulsive and disgusting than a NYC kike!
Hey, knock it off. Jewish lives are superior. Its says so in the Talmud.
i'm assuming the Technopagan forgot the /s tag???
(I greened him)
israel is running out of water. expect WWIII in the next decade or watch a new industry being created to ship fresh water to the homeland.
it will be a failed state if they dont annexx syria
DipshitMiddleCl... the usual fate for anti-semites is that they wallow in their own hatred and failure whilst the Jews outlive them and go on to achieve ever greater success. Take water and Israel for example ... a net exporter and world leader in de-salination. Or healthcare ... or electronics .. or simply humanity, social progress and culture. Leading the world despite all the haters.
all that was/is done by using money stolen from others.
You kikes wouldn't last a week without aid from the USA. You are very sucessful parasites, but you inbred bastards are at the end of your run. Jews deserve what happens to them.
Anti-semitism and bigotry of all kinds. Mark of a loser. Take the Jews - despite unimaginable hatred, prejudice, persecution and violence, overcoming and moving on to ever greater successes, of which Israel is a near-miracle, living example. Some peope admire and emulate, become successful. Others invest their energy in envy and hatred, venting spleen. Mark of a loser.
Jesus said to the Jews: "Therefore I tell you that the Kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit." (Matthew 21:43).
Jesus spent most of his time condemning Jews, as did the Biblical prophets like Jeremiah. I guess they were all anti-Semites and losers.
Jesus was born and died a Jew. A teacher, leader and rabbi. His history shamlessly distorted by generations of bigots, fearful and hateful.
You are a total ignoramus.
In that context (Mt 21:43) Jesus was speaking to a very select group of Jews and not to all of the Jews, wasn't He?
Jesus' words are words of salvation and not condemnation. But Jesus did not come to give salvation to the righteous but t the repentant sinner.
The condemnation of the hypocrisy of the Synagouge and Temple leaders was not only just but served to save some from eternal damnation...which serves, however biting, as a source of salvation.
No Jesus did not condemn the Jews. He saved them from the bondage of sin, sin which death is the fruit thereof, through the shedding of His blood on the Cross at Calvary. Through His sacrifice and resurrection from the grave both Jew and Gentile both enjoy eternal communion with the Father in Heaven.
Yet woe to those hypocrites who are deceived by their delusion of self righteousness and self piety. They will receive their just reward....and deserve it.
There is a marked difference between Jews and Zionists. All Jews are NOT Zionists...and all Zionists are NOT Jews.
Faith-based running from the truth is the true sign of a loser.
Usury is a Jew invention. They started back in biblical times. The MONEY CHANGERS were thrown out of the temple. They were kikes. Even the Magna Carta provided protections against usury and the kikes were doing the same shit back then. Shakespeare did NOT write the "Merchant of Venice" on a whim... it was based on the common kike practices of the day. They were discriminated against because back then they were the same slime they are today....
This is history folks.
If you want to open your eyes as to why our stable society has been turned upside down, read this entire post to get some of the dots to connect the big picture as to what is really happening. These are all FACTS.
They have been ejected over 100 times from other countries for doing exactly what they are doing to this country. For meddling in the affairs of stable societies and defrauding stable governments for the last 1500 years.
Less than 2% of the population control or influence everything you think and do. It is ***NOT*** because they are smarter, they have a plan to exploit the goy worldwide (NWO) and use money and family names to be well connected and manipulative.
They have deceptively used your own religion (and god which they do not believe in) to brainwash you into revering them.
They are NOT your friends, as taken from one of their own websites....
----->> http://www.aishdas.org/avodah/faxes/mmOnNachriim.pdf <<-----
"If a Jew is chasing a gentile in order to murder him, it is forbidden to kill the Jew in
order to save the gentile, even if there is no other way to save the gentile's life. A
person who kills the Jewish pursuer in order to save the gentile's life must be put to
death. But if a gentile (or a Jew) is chasing a Jew in order to murder him, one must
kill the pursuer in order to save the pursued person (if there is no other way to save
his life). This law applies to a ger toshav as well.
Sources:
Minchat Chinuch commandment 600"
"2.2) in a commercial transaction, if a Jew charges an exorbitant price or conceals the
low quality of the goods from a gentile customer he does not owe the gentile any
compensation (as he would owe a Jewish customer). According to some opinions, it
appears that this law is not applied to a ger toshav; it is forbidden to cheat him and
therefore he must be compensated if he is cheated. In any case, it is clear that if a
gentile charges an exorbitant price or conceals the low quality of the goods from a
Jewish customer, he owes the Jew compensation.
Sources:
Babylonian Talmud Tractate Bechorot 13b
Maimonides, Laws of Sales 13:7
Tur Choshen Mishpat 227:30
Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat 227:26
Minor Tractates, Tractate Gerim chapter 3
Palestinian Talmud Tractate Yevamot chapter 8 8d:1"
"2.3) When a Jew owes money to a gentile who has passed away, the Jew is not obliged
to repay the debt to the heirs, provided the latter do not know about the debt. If the
heirs ask the Jew whether he owed money to the deceased, it is even permissible to lie
to them and deny the debt (provided the Jew knows for sure that they do not know
about the debt, so that the name of G-d will not be profaned by his lie).
Sources:
Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat 283:1
Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 182:4 (uncensored edition included on the DBS version 9 CD)"
There are many more enlightening things on that PDF file for you (the GOYIM) to read
Read ALL of it to understand how deceptive and knifing they really are.
WHO CONTROLS THE U.S.A.
List Summaries
INTERNET
Who Controls E-Bay?
Summary:
Of the nine (9) eBay executives, six (6) are Jews. This is a numerical
representation of 67%. Of the eleven (11) eBay directors, two (2) are
Jews. This is a numerical representation of 18%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the eBay executives by a factor of 33.5 times(3,350 percent) and over-represented among the eBay directors by a factor of 9 times(900 percent).
Who Controls Apple?
Summary:
Of the ten (10) Apple executives, three (3) are Jews. This is a numerical
representation of 30%. Of the eight (8) Apple directors, five (5) are
Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 63%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Apple executives by a factor of 15 times(1,500 percent) and over-represented among the Apple directors by a factor of 31.5 times(3,150 percent).
Who Controls Yahoo?
Summary:
Of the thirteen (13) Yahoo! executives, eight (8) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 62%. Of the eleven (11) Yahoo! directors, five (5) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 45%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Yahoo! executives by a factor of 31 times(3,100 percent) and over-represented among the Yahoo! directors by a factor of 22.5 times(2,250 percent).
Who Controls Google?
Summary:
Of the six (6) Google executives, four (4) are Jews or have Jewish
spouses. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Of the ten (10)
Google directors, four (4) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a
numerical representation of 40%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Google executives by a factor of 33.5 times(3,350 percent) Andover-represented among the Google directors by a factor of 20 times(2,000 percent).
Who Controls Amazon?
Summary:
Of the eleven (11) Amazon.com executives, eight (8) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 73%. Of the nine (9) Amazon.com directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the Amazon.com executives by a factor of 36.5 times(3,650 percent)and over-represented among the Amazon.com directors by a factor of 33.5times(3,350 percent).
Who Controls Facebook?
Summary:
Of the three (3) Facebook executives, three (3) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 100%. Of the seven (7) Facebook directors,
four (4) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of
57%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Facebook executives by a factor of 50 times(5,000 percent) and over-represented among the Facebook directors by a factor of 28.5 times(2,850 percent).
THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965 with the signing of the Open Immigration Law Of 1965.While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law Of 1965 was the beginning of America as death as a unified nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and bribing" the law into existence with the fanaticism equaling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.
Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American Christian
culture in their aggressive efforts to change it.
The Open Immigration Law Of 1965 is a prime example of that hostility. A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJ Congress:
Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a
progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism."
Here Are the Names of the Jewish people Behind the Open Immigration Law of 1965:
1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign
Relations)* Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled 'Let us open the gates' that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 peryear for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the "Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill, the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.* Leo Pfeffer, wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open immigration.* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish neo-con, also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
* Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the Bnai Brith, (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.
Most of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Western Civ. Within the context of a Jewish-informed "multicultural America," these immigrants are encouraged
by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.
Who Controls Microsoft?
Summary:
Of the seventeen (17) Microsoft executives, six (6) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 35%. Of the nine (9) Microsoft directors,
five (5) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 56%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are
over-represented among the Microsoft executives by a factor of 17.5
times (1,750 percent) and over-represented among the Microsoft directors by a factor of 28 times(2,800 percent).
Who Controls Wikimedia?
Summary:
Of the seventeen (17) Wikimedia senior staff and trustees, five (5) are
Jews. This is a numerical representation of 29%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Wikimedia senior staff and trustees by a factor of 14.5 times (1,450 percent).
MEDIA
Who Controls Big Media?
Summary:
Of the twelve (12) senior executives of the "Big Six" media
corporations, nine (9) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a
numerical representation of 75%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the "Big Six" media corporations by a factor of 37.5 times (3,750 percent).
Who Controls Hollywood?
Summary:
Of the sixty (60) senior executives of the major Hollywood studios,
trade unions, and talent agencies, fifty (50) are Jews or have Jewish
spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies by a factor of 41.5times (4,150 percent).
Who Controls Television?
Summary:
Of the sixty-four (64) senior executives of the major television
broadcast networks, cable networks, and production companies,
fifty-seven (57) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 89%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks, and production companies by a factor of 44.5 times (4,450percent).
Who Controls Music?
Summary:
Of the fifty (50) senior executives of the major music labels and trade
organizations, thirty-nine (39) are Jews. This is a numerical
representation of 78%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior
executives of the major music labels and trade organizations by a factor of 39 times (3,900 percent).
Who Controls Radio?
Summary:
Of the forty-six (46) senior executives of the major radio broadcast
networks and station owners, twenty-eight (28) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 61%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners by factor of 30.5 times (3,050 percent).
Who Controls Advertising?
Summary:
Of the forty-six (46) senior executives of the major advertising
corporations and trade associations, thirty-one (31) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major advertising corporations and trade associations by a factor of 33.5 times (3,350 percent).
Who Controls the News? (Part 1)
Summary:
Of the sixty-seven (67) senior executives of the major television and
radio news networks, forty-seven (47) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 70%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major television and radio news networks by a factor of 35 times(3,500 percent).
Who Controls the News? (Part 2)
Summary:
Of the sixty-five (65) senior executives of the major newspapers and
news magazines, forty-two (42) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines by a factor of 32.5 times (3,250 percent).
BANKING
Who Controls the Economy?
Summary:
Of the sixty (60) senior officials of the U.S. Government economic,
financial, and monetary institutions, thirty-nine (39) are Jews or have
Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior officials of the U.S. Government economic, financial, and monetary institutions by a factor of32.5 times(3,250 percent).
Who Controls Wall Street? (Part 1)
Summary:
Of the fifty-one (51) senior executives of the major Wall Street banks,
trade exchanges, and regulatory agencies, thirty-seven (37) are Jews or
have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 72%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street banks, trade exchanges, and regulatory agencies by a factor of 36 times(3,600 percent).
Who Controls Wall Street? (Part 2)
Summary:
Of the forty (40) senior executives of the major Wall Street mutual
funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and brokerages, twenty-six (26) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street mutual funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and brokerages by a factor of 32.5 times(3,250 percent).
Who Controls Goldman Sachs?
Summary:
Of the nine (9) Goldman Sachs executives, seven (7) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 78%. Of the twelve (12) Goldman Sachs
directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 50%. Of the thirty-three (33) Goldman Sachs management committee members, twenty (20) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 61%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Goldman Sachs executives by a factor of 39 times(3,900 percent), over-represented among the Goldman Sachs directors by a factor of 25 times(2,500 percent), and over-represented on the Goldman Sachs management committee by a factor of 30.5 times(3,050 percent).
Who Controls JPMorgan Chase?
Summary:
Of the ten (10) JPMorgan Chase Operating Committee members, nine are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 90%. Of the eleven (11) JPMorgan Chase directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 45%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the JPMorgan Chase Operating Committee members by a factor of 45 times(4,500 percent) and over-represented among the JPMorgan Chase directors by a factor of 22.5 times(2,250 percent).
Who Controls American International Group?
Summary:
Of the sixteen (16) directors and trustees of American International
Group, twelve (12) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 75%.
Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the directors and trustees of American
International Group by a factor of 37.5 times (3,750 percent).
Who Controls the Treasury Department?
Summary:
Of the twenty-six (26) U.S. Treasury Department senior officials,
eighteen (18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 69%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the U.S. Treasury Department senior officials by a factor of 34.5 times (3,450 percent).
Who Controls the Federal Reserve System?
Summary:
Of the seven (7) Federal Reserve Board governors, four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Of the twelve (12) Federal Reserve District Bank presidents, four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical
representation of 33%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by a factor of 28.5 times (2,850 percent), and over-represented among the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents by a factor of 16.5 times(1,650 percent).
GOVERNMENT
Who Controls the White House?
Summary:
Of the eleven (11) current and former senior advisors of President
Barack Obama, nine (9) are Jews, partial Jews, or have Jewish spouses.
This is a numerical representation of 82%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are
over-represented among the current and former senior advisors of
President Barack Obama by a factor of 41 times (4,100 percent).
Who Controls the Senate?
Summary:
Of the twenty (20) U.S. Senate Committee chairmen, eight (8) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 40%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are
over-represented among the U.S. Senate Committee chairmen by a factor of 20 times (2,000 percent).
Who Controls the Congress?
Summary:
Of the forty-two (42) U.S. House Committee chairmen and ranking members, six (6) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 14%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. House Committee chairmen and ranking
members by a factor of 7 times (700 percent).
Who Controls the Supreme Court?
Summary:
Of the nine (9) U.S. Supreme Court justices, four (4) are Jews or partial
Jews. This is a numerical representation of 44%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Supreme Court justices by a factor of 22 times (2,200 percent).
Who Controls the State Department?
Summary:
Of the seventy-four (74) U.S. State Department senior officials,
forty (40) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 54%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the U.S. State Department senior officials by a factor of 27
times (2,700 percent).
Who Controls the Justice Department?
Summary:
Of the forty-seven (47) U.S. Justice Department senior officials,
twenty-two (22) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 47%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the U.S. Justice Department senior officials by a factor of 23.5
times(2,350 percent).
Who Controls the Defense Department?
Summary:
Of the one-hundred eleven (111) U.S. Defense Department senior
officials, forty (40) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a
numerical representation of 36%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Defense Department senior officials by a factor of 18 times (1,800 percent).
Who Controls the Treasury Department?
Summary:
Of the twenty-six (26) U.S. Treasury Department senior officials,
eighteen (18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 69%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the U.S. Treasury Department senior officials by a factor of 34.5 times (3,450 percent).
GLOBALISM
Who Controls the Group of Thirty?
Summary:
Of the forty-three (43) Group of Thirty members, twenty-three (23) are
Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 53%. Jews are approximately .25% of the world population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Group of Thirty members by a factor of 212 times (21,200 percent).
Who Controls the Bilderberg Group?
Summary:
Of the thirty-five (35) Bilberberg Steering Committee members,
sixteen (16) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 46%. Jews are approximately 1% of the population of
the Western world.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are
over-represented on the Bilberberg Steering Committee by a factor of 46 times (4,600 percent).
Who Controls the Trilateral Commission?
Summary:
Of the fifty-six (56) Trilateral Commission Executive Committee members, twenty-three (23) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 41%. Jews are approximately .25% of the world population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented on the Trilateral Commission Executive Committee by a factor of 164 times (16,400 percent).
Who Controls the Council on Foreign Relations? (Part 1)
Summary:
Of the forty-three (43) Council on Foreign Relations directors,
twenty-eight (28) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the Council on Foreign Relations directors by a factor of 32.5
times (3,250 percent).
Who Controls the Council on Foreign Relations? (Part 2)
Summary:
Of the fifty-five (55) Council on Foreign Relations think tank members,
thirty-one (31) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 56%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented in the Council on Foreign Relations think tank by a factor of 28 times(2,800 percent).
SOCIETY
Who Controls the Ivy League?
Summary:
Of the twenty-four (24) senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities, twenty (20) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities by a factor of 41.5 times (4,150 percent).
Who Controls the Think Tanks?
Summary:
Of the thirty (30) senior executives of the major think tanks,
eighteen (18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
representation of 60%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented
among the senior executives of the major think tanks by a factor of 30
times (3,000 percent).
Who Controls Professional Sports?
Summary:
Of the sixty (60) senior executives of the major sports leagues, talent
agencies, and media outlets, forty-three (43) are Jews. This is a
numerical representation of 72%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major sports leagues, talent agencies, and media outlets by a factor of 36 times (3,600 percent).
Who Controls the Anti-Defamation League?
Summary:
Of the fifty-three (53) executives and directors of the Anti-Defamation
League, fifty-three (53) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of
100%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives and directors of the Anti-Defamation League by a factor of 50 times (5,000 percent).
Who Controls the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Summary:
Of the twenty-two (22) Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff members, fifteen (15) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 68%. Of the thirteen (13) Southern Poverty Law Center directors, eight (8) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 62%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff members by a factor of 34 times(3,400 percent), and over-represented among the Southern Poverty Law Center directors by a factor of 31 times(3,100 percent).
Who Controls the American Civil Liberties Union?
Summary:
Of the nine (9) executives of the American Civil Liberties Union,
four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 44%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the executives of the American Civil Liberties Union by a factor of 22 times (2,200 percent).
Who Controls the Defense Policy Board?
Summary:
Of the twenty-two (22) Defense Policy Board members, fourteen (14) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 64%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Defense Policy Board members by a factor of 32 times (3,200 percent).
The Jews have mostly been parasites in every host nation kind enough to take them in.
They always use their money to take over the banking industry of that nation, then start buying all the politicians with their ill-gotten gains.
Then they start pornography, and homosexuality.
Then they take over the main stream media, education, and newspapers until degradation brings that nation to its knees. and
collapse sets in.
Jewish Bankers and Speculation people destroy/enslave the world.
The ownership of the 10 major Central banks are:
1. Rothschild Bank of London
2. Warburg Bank of Hamburg
3. Rothschild Bank of Berlin
4. Lehman Brothers of New York
5. Lazar Brothers of Paris
6. Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York (Now Shearson American Express)
7. Israel Moses Serif Banks of Italy
8. Goldman, Sachs of New York
9. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
10. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is centrally controlled by Nathan M. Rothschild & Sons of London.
The names of these banks, except Chase Manhattan-Rockefellers,
are all obviously Jewish names and the Rothschild name was originally Bauer.
It is easier for a camel to walk through the eye of a needle, than a rich person to go to heaven.
Read on a little further.
Matthew 19:24-26
24"Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God." 25When the disciples heard this, they were very astonished and said, "Then who can be saved?" 26And looking at them Jesus said to them, "With people this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."…
The guy who did most of the drafting for the 1965 Act was Norbert Schlei, an advisor to either Javits or Celler, I forget which. On the Act's enactment he gloated 'let the floodgates open'.
No Discussion
No Debate
No Tolerance
Boycott the beast nestled in the heart of Palestine.
Mark of ZOG in Izz can be identified by the Barcodes 500 & 729
Mark of the beast squatting in the other bits of butchered Palestine can be identified by Barcodes 7219 & 7922
Reject the poisoned and evil fruit of supremacist NAZI thugs who delight in murder
What will become of the mutt sect in apartheid Palestine when the USSA Golem's Saudi Mercan toilet paper dollah handouts cease? Do they really believe they will be allowed to squat Urupp or USSA like today's waves of refugees caused by their Anglozionazi terror? Who would accept these butchers in their neighborhood?
Palestine will be free when USSA is free!
Why are architects of strife, death, destruction & mass-misery like WORMser allowed to roam free - stuffing both their wallets on the proceeds and their fat faces in the finest Georgetown restaurants???
"And secular-Arab nationalists didn’t knock down the Twin Towers; Islamic fundamentalists did."
No, it was done by members of the Bush administration, the Israelis, the British and the Saudis. There may have been others involved but those are the main ones. It was planned by the central bankers - like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Schiffs, etc.
Also, if anyone wants to read a book demolishing the so called holocau$$$t, read the book Breaking the Spell by Nicholas Kollerstrom.
1.) What is so amazing is people like this can actually plan and implement chaos killing hundreds of thousands and not be forced to stand trial like a Nazi for crimes against humanity.
2.) Now if I was to plan and implement chaos using a gun, a college and shoot people I would be considered a criminal and mentally retarded.
The contradiction justifying all the comments below no matter what side you fall on, jew-hater or jew-lover are because of the disparity between how those 2.) points are mentioned.(you can hate / love jews, gays, gypsies, muslim, islamic extremists, or just cats, dogs whatever)
Now after decades of bullshit, I do actually believe 6 million jews were killed in the concentration camps (right / wrong does not matter because of 1. and 2., ditto the million in Iraq or 250K in Syrai) I do not give a toss now how many died anymore. Places like Auchwitz and the like, twin towers even also need bulldosing and removing, if you are not going to learn we should have no recollection of prior events so IT CAN THEN HAPPEN AGAIN.
Humanity, a failed species deserving only of extinction.
NO INTENT TO OFFEND, OF OLDER YEARS I REALLY DON'T CARE AND DO NOT THINK I SHOULD BE EXPECTED TO CIRCUMSTANCES AND ALL.
When you treat your neighbors as if they were pieces of shit, don't act surprised when you find your house burning to the ground....
The NYTimes should be hacked and this article run front and center on its website for one month. Wake the world up.
The New York Slimes, like all the major media, is jew run. They either push the commie line - which they invented - or push the Zionism line - which they invented. There are very few Jews who actually tell the truth about both sides.
DECEIT IS THER MOTTO and religion, they even brag about it.
You had me at "poppycock".
Bullshit. Israel just wants to survive. There are no Palestiains, they are the refugees that islam has created to plague the world. Why do the islamic nations take no refugees or assimilate the refugee camps? Plan to destroy Israel. You guys should all head to the mosque and sign up.
99% of those calling themselves jews in israel have ZERO dna link to that place or story. It's all a fraud. Israel was setup as a global crime capital. Period. Documented fact.
Theres no physical link between DNA and land.
Theres no physical link between DNA and land.
Well, the idea of israel and the jews is certainly linked by hundreds of years of propaganda. Point being that a bunch of khazars convereted to judaism and now claim ownership of the lands of israel is the greatest farcical idea in human history. They belong back where they stem from. The sewers of eastern europe. Which is why they are cleansing the Ukraine of all it's inhabitants as we speak as they know the world has awoken to the great lie known as zionism.
Ownership is a superstition. All claims of ownership are bogus, universally. Lands are occupied by whoever is strong enough to do so. Furthermore, there are no such thing as "lands", theres only the single land of planet earth, like a land ends at an imaginary line and then starts another land.. At best you could talk about continents or geographical areas.
Good luck with your circle jerk. Or is it circle. Jerk.
Like Dutch Boy you like to engage in brief debate simulacra, for no good reason, but quickly resort to ad hominem.
hominem hominem hominem there Hymie. I've run logical rings around you with no effort. Move on.
According to Ottoman records, at the beginning of the 20th century, there were over 1 million Arabs living in Palestine, and around 3,000 Jews. After WWI, Zionists imported hundreds of thousands of European Jews into Palestine, but even by 1948 Jews were no more than about 30% of the population and owned only around 2% of the land. The state of Israel was created in 1948 by expulsion of 750,000 of the indigenous Arabs so as to create an artificial Jewish majority that could never have existed otherwise.
The irony is that even the New York Times now admits that Ashkenazi Jews (the founders of Israel and its primary immigrants) are not ancestrally Middle Eastern, but are European converts, as the Khazar therory which Jews have desperately tried to discredit claims:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/09/science/ashkenazi-origins-may-be-with-...
http://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html
You should read Israeli scholar Shlomo Sand, who unravels the entire Jewish national myth in his seminal work "The Invention of the Jewish People":
http://www.amazon.com/Invention-Jewish-People-Shlomo-Sand/dp/1844676234
Peace in the middle east
It is always important to remember, America had NO enemies in the Middle East before israel was created.
America didnt have any enemies before it got involved in WW1. It got plenty after WW1 including in the middle east.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
Israel WILL wither away in 10 years, tops!!
Just thinking ... what kind pf person trawls websites looking for opportunities to slag off Jews? Freak, loser, retrograde ...maybe but then I'm feeling charitable today.
LOL, the only ones who "trawls" websites, are zionists hasbara Jews who are paid mecinaries who attack honesty, and promote zionist lies.
what's wrong, truth hurt too much?
THis is the thing about the Israelis. They claim that all they want is to 'live in peace'. I think most fair-minded people would have no problem with that. Except that the Israelis want to 'live in peace' not just within their own internationally-recognized borders but in land they've militarily occupied and planted with settlers. That peace will be elusive.
Every single country on earth has the same story. All countries are occupied by whatever army won the last war. You'd think before 1948 there were no such thing as war and settlement.
Going great until this: And secular-Arab nationalists didn’t knock down the Twin Towers; Islamic fundamentalists did.
All credibility lost in the space of a single sentence. Has he not heard of the 'Dancing Israelis', the warning to Odigo staff, Dov Zakheim's plane interceptor capabilities, Larry 'Pull It' Silverstein's WTC 7 descending in free-fall 20 minutes after the BBC reported it had fallen? I could go on but the author of this article seriously fails the 9/11 Litmus Test and as such his motivation must be in question.
Yes, for final confirmation, the pass/fail 911 litmus test is the last word. That said, the article is worthwhile.
Which leaves David Duke the only worthwhile presidential candidate.
The longer an article the greatest the chance someone wont like a specific part of it. Kinda like with recipes, the more ingredients in a dish, the bigger the chance someone will not like one of them.
"And the “Coping” report envisioned a supporting role in that project for Ahmed Chalabi, identified by Wurmser as “one of the most prominent of the Iraqi opposition figures to Saddam” and “himself a Shiite and a close, long-time Hashemite confidant.” Wurmser further anticipated that:"
The fact that a two-bit turd who is a cross between a carnival barker and the boy who cried wolf was able to influence U.S. foreign policy towards Iraq tells us all we need to know about said foreign policy, and the blood thirsty assholes who were behind what this author calls statecraft.
This is the best article I've read about that part of the world in some years, an excellent update on a fucked up situation caused by Western powers, CIA/MI6/Mossad, and the energy companies.
Chalabi was the fucking darling of the press in the run-up to the Iraq war. He lied through his teeth about WMD and supposed atrocities which never happened under Saddam. He was on 60 Minutes and any number of other shows the rubes here in the States watch in order to get their fill of disgusting propaganda.
The blood is on the hands of those who believed Chalabi, and who went along with his agenda for Iraq and the greater ME.
why do we tolorate this?
GO anti zios!
"Thermonuclear lake of fire engulfing the whole world"
I'm not discounting the possibility but that is so overly melodramatic. Whats wrong with just describing things as they are?
Crap bag web site for RT propaganda and perverted psycopaths
how do we get rid of this evil...
looks like now they are going to create ISIS in Turkey... Israel hates turkey
Yet, one would expect the 9/11 attacks to have pulled the rug out from under this rationale. Aren’t the 9/11 attacks why the US is raining bombs throughout the Muslim world in the first place?
What 9/11 attacks?
Why did WTC7 fall down?
The piece is missing the main story of the Israel Lobby. Since hardly anyone on ZH knows any Jews, let alone Zionist ones, here is public service announcement to Jew haters and others. This is the main story in the Israel Lobby:
"
AIPAC dazzled friends and foes with its glamorous annual conference and deceptive display of apparently lavish influence. Now, all pretense has been stripped away. As should be evident from the Iran deal debacle, AIPAC isn’t a pro-Israel lobbying powerhouse at all; it’s a Jewish fundraising and marketing gimmick—a party planner, not a power broker. As Gil Troy, a pro-AIPAC defender would have it, people who criticize AIPAC have AIPAC all wrong: AIPAC isn’t a “political cabal,” writes Troy, but a “Zionist hootenanny.”
I’m all for Jewish pride, and given how low Israel ranks on the list of American Jews’ political priorities, a fun annual conference, or, in Professor Troy’s words, “a rousing, joyous, pro-Israel celebration” is a fine idea. But that isn’t how AIPAC portrays itself. Rather than presenting itself as a more elaborate Celebrate Israel parade, AIPAC sucks millions into its maw by making the case that it is a hugely powerful lobby. Worse, it interferes with actual policy lobbying, often going directly against Israel’s interests in order to keep the broadest possible swath of politicos happy to come to its big bash, the woefully misnamed “Policy Conference.”
http://5tjt.com/how-aipac-failed-us/
More gems, more entertaining than Trump:
"
Israel, for the first time, reached out to the United States, seeking support to counter a genocidal plan that threatens the security of America and the existence of the Jewish State—a plan the American public rejects 2:1 and that should be easy to kill. AIPAC went straight into fundraising mode, boasting about the tens of millions of dollars it would spend on advertising and touting its hundreds of high-level meetings. The results of AIPAC’s big show? Catastrophe, utter and complete. Humiliation for American Jews and peril for Israel. AIPAC squandered millions to no avail and held meetings without effect. It was inevitable: this is the price of AIPAC’s fetish for “bipartisanship” and “access” to the chambers of power for fundraising purposes at the expense of actual pro-Israel policy.
Why do jews even bother with American politicans.. they can elect their own president now. AIPAC should take over all armed forces on the USA and remame them IDF...
After they take the guns of course
Who would have guessed this would turn into a lunatic Duker spamfest?
Was USA ever a christian nation or is that a fable?
Interesting comparison between maggots and bigots. Both love shit.
With my compliments to the anti-semites.
define semite
damnpol, You shure know you shit and are very eloquent in refuting all the facts with your reply.
(Read “Breaking the spell” by Nicholas Kollerstrom)
Acknowledged scientific fact] If a body is exposed to zyklon B / Cyanide gas or Cyanide liquid what colour would the body / corpse take on? The answer is a bright pink hue (Hot Pink as is better described nowadays)…
SO where were all the “pink corpses” and why wasn’t this a “major part” of the stories that raged from 1943 onwards? it would have been so damning, such an unmistakeable red flag for the Germans it would have left not a shred of dispute, therefore, the fact that there was no such claims whatsoever, it begs one to question the same logic from the other viewpoint…. (would anyone be shocked to know the BBC were instrumental in heading up the Holocaust / death camps stories from 1942 onwards… the BBC wouldn’t lie would they...
Could it be that all these years later science has finally caught up with the LIES & now proves it was all made up… Hence there has been a “ban on even denying it by law”… even if proof can be supplied, its now a criminal offence if its deemed that it could be “seen as denial” or “could cause offence”
The “6 million” quote has been doing the rounds since 1800 onwards, in fact it was mentioned no less than 166 times “before” 1939. Here’s 1 of the 166 from newspapers of the day:1906 – New York Times, 25 March 1906: “… the condition and future of Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews were made on March 12 in Berlin to the annual meeting of the Central Jewish Relief League of Germany by
Dr. Paul Nathan … He left St. Petersburg with the firm conviction that the Russian Government’s studied policy for the “solution” of the Jewish question is systematic and murderous extermination.”
No mention of the fact that the Zionist Bolshevik Jews attempted several coups in Russia leading up to the 1900’s, and again in 1904…is it any wonder the Romanov’s & the Russian Goyim disliked the Zionist Jews?) Don’t forget that around 1907 Germany took them all in after Russia had expelled most of them…(not murdered them) Why are they always expelled from every country they reside in? Two examples being Britain in 1285 & Spain in 1497.
Must just be a coincidence or plain old bad luck, I mean they wouldn’t do any harm to any gracious host nation now would they … right?
WW2 & the (unproven) Murdering of innocent Jewish people, Note also that there were also stories from the camps claiming that a “Diesel Russian tank engine” was captured & transported from the Russian front line, to be used to gas Jews (their own words) at belzec… so the Nazi’s specifically had a Russian tank engine dragged from the Russian front to south eastern Poland, set up & engineered to “gas Jews by carbon monoxide”…. knowing how efficient the Germans were, well i’ll leave folks to do the math on that one. There were obviously no other diesel engines for 100’s of miles that could have been utilized?
Also i’ll just throw in here, that diesel fumes are carbon dioxide, not monoxide…. one kills, the other doesn’t…. another claim scientifically laid to rest (shhhhh don’t tell anyone or else!!!)
even the decrypts from Bletchley park, have not a single record of the words “gas chamber”, “death camp”, exterminations camp etc or “any German equivalent” NOTHING…. How strange… yes there plenty of mentions of “labour camps”. But hey people don’t want facts they want something that keeps them in their comfort zone
The words “final solution” mentioned by Jews in Russia (1904 – The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), 7 October 1904 ) as “the expulsion” from Russia.Could this have been the same “Final Solution” Hitler alluded to when he signed the Haavara Agreement with the Zionist Jews to have Jewish Families & all their belongings shipped intact to Palestine (there’s even a medal & written records to prove it took place)… right up to 1941 when war brought the program to an abrupt end. Madagascar would also have been utilized as part of the “Final Solution” in ridding Germany of “this alien religious tribe who called them selves Jews” as record prove. Why Madagascar & not Iceland or the poles to make them suffer? The “Theory” that Final solutions meant “killing all Jews” was a fantasy made up to fit the Zionist narrative to “aid the promotion of the claim in getting promised land state of Israel”.
Lets take a look at Jewish births & deaths recorded from “their own records of the world Jewish almanac” Jewish population from 1933 to 1948
1933: 15,315,000 (15.315 Million) Jews worldwide1948: 15,753,638 ( 15.753 Million) Jews worldwide Official International Red Cross Records, from the war concluded that 271,301 people died “in all camps combined” by the wars end in May 1945. This official IRC record from Arolson in Germany, since coming to light, thought lost forever by the Zionists. The Zionist jews suddenly do a 180 degree turn and claim after all these years that the IRC doesn’t hold accurate records & Can’t be trusted and must “change their records to reflect “the Jewish acclaimed counts from the war”… it seems Records are only acceptable when it fit’s their stories. Yet again truth is no defence…
Note the number of dead counted at Auschwitz was revised down in 1989 from 4,100,000 to 1,500,000 Yet the magic 6MILLION MURDERED Figure still remains intact.. Why? How?Too know who is in control, one only has to see whom we may not criticize or question
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through…all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” – Marcus Tullius Cicero