This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Obama Won't Back Down After Chinese Threat, Sends U.S. Warships To Contested Islands In "Matter Of Days"

Tyler Durden's picture




 

On Friday, we reported the latest provocation in what has truly become a very dangerous, if largely pointless, staring contest between Beijing and Washington over China’s reclamation of land in The South China Sea. 

Responding to suggestions that the US was set to sail warships around the islands Beijing has constructed atop reefs in the Spratlys, China served noticed that it would “never allow any country to violate China's territorial waters and airspace in the Spratly Islands, in the name of protecting freedom of navigation and overflight.” This was simply a formalized version of the more concise phrasing the PLA navy used when they instructed the pilots flying a US spy plane to “Go now!” when it ventured too close to Fiery Cross earlier this year. 

It’s not immediately clear what China intends to do with the islands and further, it’s not entirely clear why anyone should necessarily care if Beijing wants to build “sand castles” in the middle of the ocean, but then again, for America’s regional allies the land reclamation efforts look a lot an attempt to build a series of military outposts by creating sovereign territory where there was none thereby effectively redrawing maritime boundaries and so, big brother in Washington is set to step in in order to protect vital shipping lanes. 

Of course having already said that the navy plans to sail ships into the waters around the islands, the US can ill-afford to allow China’s “we won’t tolerate that” pronouncement to deter the Pentagon because the optics around that would be terrible at a time when the world is already questioning the strength and resolve of the US military. So the ships will indeed sail. Here’s WSJ:

The U.S. determination to challenge China with patrols near Chinese-built islands in the South China Sea will test Xi Jinping’s recent pledge that Beijing doesn’t intend to “militarize” the islands, an announcement that took U.S. officials by surprise.

 

The Chinese leader made the commitment during a news conference with President Barack Obama at the White House late last month, though he left it unclear how the pledge would affect China’s activities in the disputed area of the South China Sea.

 

If Mr. Xi’s goal was to discourage the U.S. from conducting patrols near the artificial islands, he doesn’t appear to have succeeded. After months of debate in the U.S. government, there is now a consensus that the U.S. Navy should send ships or aircraft within 12 nautical miles of the artificial islands to challenge China’s territorial claims there, according to people familiar with internal discussions.

 


 

A U.S. official confirmed Sunday that a decision had been made to conduct such patrols but said it was unclear when that might happen or where exactly. “It’s just a matter of time when it happens,” the official said. Another U.S. official indicated that the operation could come within days.

 

The question now is whether China will respond to such operations by reining in its plans to develop the islands or backing away from the commitment not to militarize them, pointing to the U.S. patrols as a provocation.

Anyone who knows anything about how China generally prefers to respond in situations like these knows that Beijing will almost certainly call any US naval presence a "provocation" and they'll be exactly right. After all, there's something rather ironic about claiming that China is in the process of militarizing the South China Sea and then deciding that the best way to de-escalate the situation is to sail warships to the area. Here's WSJ again:

The Pacific Fleet has been ready to conduct “freedom of navigation operations,” or Fonops, around China’s artificial islands for months after being asked to draw up options by U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter earlier this year. The decision to begin the patrols appears to have been delayed to avoid disrupting the summit, people familiar with internal discussions say.

 

“A U.S. Fonop gives China an opportunity to assert that the United States is the country ‘militarizing’ the South China Sea and, if China chooses, such a Fonop provides a rationale for China to further militarize or develop the features it occupies,” said Taylor Fravel, an expert on the Chinese military at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

So in reality, the real question is this: now that Russia has moved to effectively reclaim the Mid-East from US influence, and now that China is in the process of using its island building efforts to establish what we've called a kind of Sino-Monroe Doctrine, how long will it be before someone actually challenges the US military by shooting down a plane in the desert or firing on a ship in the Spratlys just to test Washington's resolve?

* * *

Finally here again, as a reminder, are the satellite images which demonstrate the extent to which Beijing is "changing the landscape", so to speak, in the South China Sea.

Subi:

Fiery Cross:

Mischief: 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 10/12/2015 - 07:58 | 6657673 JustObserving
JustObserving's picture

Meanwhile tensions with Russia continue to mount in Syria and a major war gets closer everyday.  Gold and oil prices should reflect these rising tensions.  Will China send troops to Syria in return?

US-Russian proxy war in Syria intensifies 


By Thomas Gaist 
12 October 2015 


A coalition of Russian, Iranian, and Syrian government military forces recaptured strategic areas of central Syria from US-backed Islamist militias during a joint offensive this weekend.

Russian war planes launched some 70 strikes in support of assaults by Syrian government troops and Iranian militias against rebel-held towns in the highland region of Tal Skik. The recaptured areas were occupied earlier this year by Islamist militant groups, including Al Nusra Front and other Al Qaeda-linked rebels,that are in direct alliance with Washington and its allies. The clashes between US and Russian-backed forces have underscored the immense danger of yet another major escalation of the Syrian war. Less than five years since it began, the US-fomented civil war in Syria has placed American and Russian forces squarely on opposite sides of an explosive proxy war.

Moscow’s turn to direct intervention in the war has been followed by a sharp escalation of anti-Russian propaganda and announcements of stepped-up US intervention in Syria.

In a statement released Friday, the Pentagon confirmed its preparations to extend new forms of military aid to Kurdish nationalist militias as well as Sunni Islamist fighters. The US military will transfer “equipment packages and weapons” into the hands of “a select group of vetted leaders and their units,” an official Defense Department release said on Friday.

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/10/12/syri-o12.html

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:03 | 6657689 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

There seems little doubt the crumbling American Empire wants a shooting war to distract the masses from the coming economic collapse.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:06 | 6657693 fudge
fudge's picture

^^^^^ This

They desperately need some one else to 'blame'

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:12 | 6657699 Latina Lover
Latina Lover's picture

Agreed. The  Fed Reserve System ponzi scheme is running out of new resources to sustain it.  The Russian color revolution failed, the Ukraine is a bust, Syria and Iran cannot be further looted, China is no longer willing to buy USSA Treasuries, so the only solution is a global reset. WW1 and WW2 were financed by western banksters, making them trillionaires. They are mere trying to repeat past successes.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:15 | 6657715 Looney
Looney's picture

... there is now a consensus that the U.S. Navy should send ships or aircraft within 12 nautical miles of the artificial islands to challenge China’s

Are we taking our SECOND Pearl Harbor closer to “them”?

Looney

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:30 | 6657760 Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill's picture

On a bighter note, there should be some very good artificials reefs in the near future.

This is stupid and maybe suicidal.The  Chinese might let loose a salvo of returning UST's

at the minimum.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:49 | 6657821 messymerry
messymerry's picture

Great point Winston.  An economic retaliation instead of a military one.  The Chinese don't have to spend any money and the U.S. gets a load of egg in it's face. 

OBTW:  I'm sure the PRC is monitoring ZH...

;-D    

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:56 | 6657854 Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill's picture

i can't name any intelligence agency that isn't.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:19 | 6657943 remain calm
remain calm's picture

Oh, he will back down wait till the punch him in those nose

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:44 | 6658058 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Where'd they get the money to build those things?

From selling us useless consumerist junk, which we bought with bubble money from our banksters.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:09 | 6658155 Antifaschistische
Antifaschistische's picture

and isn't that an interesting phenomenon....they have the money/resources because they've sold useless consumerist junk.

and they're building disposable islands.  You know...an Atoll Reef is self protecting.  Because of it's shape, it creats the calm lagoon waters, which protects the interior side of the reef.  When you destroy 1/2 of the Atoll, to build up the other 1/2, you make your strip of land vulnerable to storm waters from both directions.

china could surely spend it's money more effectively....but, this is central planning gone wild.

ps...Mr. Xi, since your cargo ships are leaving Long Beach empty, why don't you take a load of used, sand blasted car bodies and sink them along the  now destroyed reefs to help nature rebuild.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:27 | 6658223 NoDebt
NoDebt's picture

Obama, still stinging from multiple humiliating defeats at the hands of Putin (who started from an inferior position with inferior resources), decides to try his act out on the Chinese...

News at 11.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:50 | 6658331 Manthong
Manthong's picture

Well, the good news is that joe biden and his illustrious family is there to back up the Kenyan and Chewie.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:48 | 6658579 Bunghole
Bunghole's picture

I'll be waiting for the 60 Minutes Steve Kroft interview with Xi next week.

This shit is so scripted, it's pathetic.

Must find excuse to hide coming financial collapse.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:03 | 6658645 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

The US Navy goes anywhere and everywhere freedom of navigation of the seas  comes under threat.   Some day we will give up that thankless job, under the weight of our entitlement burdens, and currently I dont see anyone friendly to the western civilization taking up the burden we took over from the British.  

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:19 | 6658725 Theosebes Goodfellow
Theosebes Goodfellow's picture

I still can't get past the notion that Obama is deadly serious about seeing America "taken down a peg or two". His blatant hatred for American exceptionalism is evident in his scaling down of American military might, yet he dangerously projects it into a adisputed zone on the other side of the planet. What better way to take America down a peg or two than to have its military vanquished on the other side of the world?

Some of you may ask if this president could be that corrupt and evil. Others do not have to ask.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:45 | 6658861 Deathrips
Deathrips's picture

I vote to send ONLY OBAMA....

 

RIPS

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:52 | 6658904 Theosebes Goodfellow
Theosebes Goodfellow's picture

You and me both, Ripsie, you and me both.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:00 | 6658946 Four chan
Four chan's picture

...in further news obama fucks up wet dream, film at 11.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 20:48 | 6660920 tenpanhandle
tenpanhandle's picture

Where are all the environmentalists as China is destroying those reefs.  On another note, looking at that dashed line it would seem that a Phillippino beach goer on an air mattress would violet China's claimed waters.  Their claims are ludicrous.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 21:09 | 6660982 Stuck on Zero
Stuck on Zero's picture

Agree. China has destroyed some of the finest reefs in thw world.  The Southwestern Pacific has the most varied reefs anywhere on the planet.  They are destroyed now. Thanks China.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 23:04 | 6661373 eatthebanksters
eatthebanksters's picture

POTUS needs to distract us from the disaster in Syria and he wants to look strong...so he goes for the Spratly Islands.  He's drawing another Red Line...watch him fuck this up as well.

Tue, 10/13/2015 - 07:03 | 6662020 BarkingCat
BarkingCat's picture

Drawing lines in the ocean is not very smart

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:01 | 6658949 CuttingEdge
CuttingEdge's picture

A huge uptick for JustObserving and his SitReps visa via Syria, Ukraine etc.

Cuts through a lot of the bollocks and deals out the hard facts.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 15:23 | 6659695 messymerry
messymerry's picture

Yeah Rips, in an effing bathtub,,,with only one oar...naked...

That ought to scare them commies into submission,,,

;-D    

Tue, 10/13/2015 - 08:54 | 6662268 Refuse-Resist
Refuse-Resist's picture

On top of a love/Nobel peaceprize bomb, like Slim Pickens' character at the end of Dr. Strangelove.

Yeeeehaaaaaaa!  Maybe we could put Reggie on their with him.

Ride em cowboy!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 14:44 | 6659526 Antifaschistische
Antifaschistische's picture

if china would have put the same amount of money/effort into building a top notch world class aircraft facility, they would only be a few years away from destroying Boeing.  Wouldn't that have been a better idea if you wanted to dominate the world?

Tue, 10/13/2015 - 07:04 | 6662023 BarkingCat
BarkingCat's picture

Would you fly in an aircraft made by the Chinese?

Boeing with its outsourcing is bad enough.

Tue, 10/13/2015 - 02:35 | 6661817 beemasters
beemasters's picture

Kroft: Which part of "South China Sea" indicates it belongs to you?

Obama: err...."Sea"?

Kroft: Don't you think you look like a stalker sending a warship all the way there?

Obama: Wait a minute there, Steve. We have pre-warned the Chinese. The island has to move to make way for my ship. We are exceptional.(Loud cheering & clapping in the background) Those Chinese are bad, bad people.

Kroft: Oh, ok. I will interview you again next year to ask tougher questions if this proves to be a failure.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:27 | 6658225 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

why not indeed.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:37 | 6658273 Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill's picture

Looks like the USN is bringing that scrap irone for them so don't worry.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:14 | 6658700 shovelhead
shovelhead's picture

Ooch, that smarts.

The real problem is your probably right. The trick is to lure them in close enough.

Considering the response to a "new reef" those island will probably be the safest place on Earth.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:12 | 6658444 o r c k
o r c k's picture

Actually, humans moving sand around the ocean is a doomed undertaking without constant dredging. The sea quickly reclaims her own. Most of the corals are likely dead but they will recover - unlike the human societies using these islands as nuclear chess pieces.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 21:14 | 6661001 hannah
hannah's picture

if the chinese sunk pilings like 2 miles down into the volcano they could build on top of that...!

Tue, 10/13/2015 - 07:13 | 6662031 wintermute
wintermute's picture

...like, like an oil rig

There is an unused one they could have "Deepwater Horizon" should be able to put that on top of an undersea volcano and create an artifical island!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:33 | 6658787 Paveway IV
Paveway IV's picture

"...You know...an Atoll Reef is self protecting..."

A LIVE one is. By coverning them with sand, the Chinese have killed the living coral that made up the reef and maintain it. The sand slopes away from the island when they build it, so they have killed the coral for several hudred yards offshore - basically any coral that contributed to the life of the reef itself.

Dead coral is like any other rock in the ocean - it's just a matter of time before wind and waves turn it back into sand. By converting a live reef to a pile of sand, the Chinese have made an island that must constantly be maintained. They will have to dredge sand and add to that island for an eternity.

One or two years without maintenance OR a significant typhoon and their artificial islands will be washed/blown away. The coral might re-establish itself in twenty or thirty years, but not enough to rebuild the reef. That's maybe a hundred years.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 15:20 | 6659690 popeye
popeye's picture

Absolutely agree. I've been scratching my head on this one. Why put all this effort into a short term construction?

 

My conclusion: either 1 - this was a bureaucratic decision by an idiot, or 2 - the islands serve a short term purpose, most likley to protect those self same shipping lanes the US purports to be so concerned about.

 

A look at a map reveals that most of the shipping through the South China Sea is destined for or originates from China. So China has a vested interest in protecting said shipping. Hence the conversion of certain reefs into islands. But if this is their purpose - protection of Chinese shipping - seemingly the Chinese don't envisage the protection is required long term (just long enough to neutralise a perceived threat).

 

Now clearly this calls into question why the US cares? Freedom of navigation in this area is only important to China & Vietnam (and a few Filipino fishermen). The islands are only a temporary phenomenon. Other nations (Vietnam, Philippines) have also constructed isalnds in the South China Sea, without any protest (or even acknowledgement) from the US.The US is not a party or signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, so has no legitimacy in claiming to uphold or enforce its provisions.

 

The US is lying about its purpose in challenging China in this region. And its a very transparent lie to anyone bothering to look at a map.

 

I'm not being pro-China here, just anti-BS.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 16:24 | 6659938 Paveway IV
Paveway IV's picture

The U.S. probably made plans to do the exact same thing - then the Chinese found out and beat them to the punch. Another intelligence 'win' for the dimwits in Langley and D.C.

The enemies of the enemies of the U.S. Constitution must make China my friend, I guess. Go Team China - kick Team Evil's ass!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:58 | 6657861 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

A drunken, battered, shamed bully spoiling for a fight.

Never imagined I'd be watching such behaviour on a grand, global scale.

Trouble is you never know about the wheels within wheels. Deals within deals.

MIC needs to burn oil and blow up munitions....and brown and yellow and dark skinned people while they are at it...

The usual question needs to be asked, how does Israel benefit?

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:11 | 6658169 Overfed
Overfed's picture

The color of the people on the receiving end of the bombs is purely coincidental. They are doing what they can to destroy white European/American culture, as well. They are just a little more insidious about it.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:33 | 6658254 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

although it is a distinction that takes some really careful inspection to make, it looks to me more like israel is trying to get europe and, more, the u.s. in the same situation with the same enemies and mind set that israel has.  if it takes killing a few thousand u.s. citizens in a false flag operation or two or a dozen disasterous wars of choice, well that's a small price to pay for greater israel.

gets to nearly the same place but with a somewhat different motive

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:18 | 6658449 ZD1
ZD1's picture

 

 

The subject is Obama and his response to China in the South China Sea.

So why hijack the thread by bringing up Isreal?

No doubt you think that Israel, a country of about 6 million, is also responsible for what is happening with China in the South China Sea?

Those Jooos must have some super human powers to orchestrate events all over the planet?

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:40 | 6658541 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

Because USSA is tied at the colon to Israel....or have you missed the past 150 or more years of history? 

Who controls US foreign and domestic policy?

Who gets billions a year in hush/slush and god kknows what money?

Who brazenly steals USSA and other technology?

You are blind if you cannot see the rot at your core....

 

While we are at it, do you know the history of Jews in China? Who made Mao?

Study up...

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:53 | 6658599 ZD1
ZD1's picture

"Because USSA is tied at the colon to Israel....or have you missed the past 150 or more years of history? "

 

Isreal become a country in 1948 after WWII.

Instead of regurgitating your Marxist and Muslim indoctrination, maybe you should study up?

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:10 | 6658677 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

Perhaps you do not know that Israel is the JEWISH homeland (so called and claimed)?

When was the Balfour declaration signed?

Who created the FED? (1913 in case you did not know, Jekyll island was 1910). JP morgan instigated the crash of 1907....

Want to keep going back in history? First National Bank of America? Second? 

Which dots can your fool head not connect?

Now fuck off....

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:48 | 6658879 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

ORI, you won't get anywhere with these trolls. Falconflight, Teh Finn and this particular douchebag either have NO IDEA on world history, or have been sent here to derail the threads. Take your pick. We all lose here in the meantime having to read their pathetic gibberish.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:59 | 6658936 ZD1
ZD1's picture

 

You're the douchebags who derail EVERY thread here by bringing up Israel and the Zionists (aka Jews).

We all lose here having to read your pathetic gibberish.

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:09 | 6658982 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

You're fuckan hopeless pal. You can't even get your terms correct, let alone form a rational and logical argument. 

Zionism and the NWO are most definately on point with these threads. The fact you can't see it isn't our fault.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:19 | 6659050 ZD1
ZD1's picture

 

 

You're fuckan hopeless pal. You can't even get your terms correct, let alone form a rational and logical argument. 

Israel and the Zionists (aka Jews) are definitely NOT on point with this thread about Obama's response to China in the South China Seas. The fact you can't see it isn't our fault.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:53 | 6658898 ZD1
ZD1's picture

"Which dots can your fool head not connect? Now fuck off.... "

 

 

Of course with your Marxist and Muslim indoctrination, you want to blame Israel for everything even though Israel never existed until 1948.

 

 

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 20:47 | 6660923 WOAR
WOAR's picture

The people existed. That's all that matters, not the nation.

Nations are made.

People endure.

Tue, 10/13/2015 - 07:31 | 6662057 BarkingCat
BarkingCat's picture

Bill Clinton had no problem blowing up white Serbs when he was president. So your point is absolutely valid.

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:45 | 6658303 grgy
grgy's picture

"The usual question needs to be asked, how does Israel benefit?"  - ORI

 

It provides a wonderful distraction while Israel slowly destroys the Palistinian State and its inhabitants.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:30 | 6658500 ZD1
ZD1's picture

 

 

The subject is Obama's response to China in the South China Sea.

So why bring up the distraction of Isreal unless you are a rabid Jew hater?

The Palistinian State (aka PLO) has done nothing to improve the situation for most Palestinian Muslims and exists solely to destroy Isreal.

 

It's Arab Muslims who deny the Palestinian state:

“There is no such country as Palestine. ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented. There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria. ‘Palestine’ is alien to us. It is the Zionists who introduced it.” – Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi, Syrian Arab leader

There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. You are an integral part of the Syrian people, Palestine is an integral part of Syria. Therefore it is we, the Syrian authorities, who are the true representatives of the Palestinian people.” – Syrian dictator Hafez Assad to the PLO leader Yassir Arafat

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:52 | 6658597 Bunghole
Bunghole's picture

Bashing Israel is not Jew hating, asshat.

Zionist hating, yes.  Jew hating, no.

You simpletons should learn the difference.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:43 | 6658646 ZD1
ZD1's picture

Zionist is a substitue word for 'Jew.'

So you hate the Zionists (aka Jews)?

Where are the Zionists (aka Jews) in Israel, who have been in the area for ions, supposed to go because you hate them?

So a tiny country of 6 million Zionists (aka Jews) in Israel is behind Obama's response to China in the South China seas?

Does Valerie Jarrett, Obama's Iranian born Senior Advisor, also take orders from the Zionists (aka Jews) in Isreal?

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:44 | 6658852 Herd Redirectio...
Herd Redirection Committee's picture

Well, they are certainly responsible for:

Justice

Entertainment

World finance

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:49 | 6659244 ZD1
ZD1's picture

"Well, they are certainly responsible for: Justice, Entertainment, World finance"

 


If they are responsible for all those things, then the rest of the world must be dumber than hell and without any hope.

Tue, 10/13/2015 - 23:41 | 6665696 qomolangma
qomolangma's picture

READ ON:

 

The Official Website Of Andrew Carrington Hitchcock

http://www.thesynagogueofsatan.com/

 

Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from "Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time"

 

DEAN HENDERSON's Left Hook column, also his books such as "Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf..."
https://hendersonlefthook.wordpress.com/big-oil-reviews/

Tue, 10/13/2015 - 23:36 | 6665684 qomolangma
qomolangma's picture

"Well, they are certainly responsible for:

Justice

Entertainment

World finance" - HR


Also ALL the kinds of MEDIA (print, teevee, radio, online); MIC,...

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:56 | 6658922 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

Learn some actual history. Read up on the Rothschilds, the Balfour Declaration and Zionism, and stop with the Jewish canard already. The Creature from Jekyll Island might help you connect some dots too (by G Edward Griffin). Maybe study who runs the FED, UST and State Dept as well.

Right now, your arguments are shallow, hollow and pointless.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:05 | 6658951 ZD1
ZD1's picture

 

 

Why don't you stop regurgitating your Marxist and Muslim indoctrination about Israel and the Zionists (aka Jews) that you hijack EVERY thread with?

Right now, your arguments are shallow, hollow, pointless, and tiresome.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:11 | 6659001 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

You have removed any doubt that you are nothing but a troll.

I'm asking Tyler to please turf your ass off this board.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:28 | 6659090 ZD1
ZD1's picture

"I'm asking Tyler to please turf your ass off this board."

 

 

What a typical lame response from a brainwashed indoctrinated Marxist who wants to permanently silence anyone who dares to disagree with him.

No doubt your favorite dictator Castro taught you all that you know?

 

You have removed any doubt that you are nothing but a Zionist (aka Jew) hating troll.

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:58 | 6658935 Oldballplayer
Oldballplayer's picture

Having been over there, I don't mind at all if the muzzies are destroyed.

I don't want anyone's kids killed.  But, if they want to fight--fight.  Get it over with.  One way or the other.  I think the Palis know how that is going to end.

Instead, they just whine and throw stones like little girls.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:59 | 6658383 teslaberry
teslaberry's picture

the nazi's on zh are strong. 

 

ori continues to harp on everything in the world being the fault of the joos and israel. keep going nazi face. this is all i hear out of you for years. you've had some inciteful posts, but you are essentially francis sawyer now. 

 

and zh comment boards a sewer. 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:35 | 6658526 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

I'm half (or 1/3rd) jewish....believe it or not.

I can make clear distinctions between when my people FUCK up (and they have, poor brainwashed talmudized duds), what they are responsible for and what they have coming to them.

None of it is good and fucking actions speak louder than fucking words and Israel (it's creation itaelf) was and is a fucking travesty, get it DINGLEBERRY?

And all the rest of you hasbra trolls or other simpering jews who have no understanding of what a RAbbi actually fucking is...

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:52 | 6658559 Bunghole
Bunghole's picture

Godwin's Law reigns supreme here at the Hedge with the butthurt Hasbaras.

NAZI, NAZI, NAZI, HITLER, HITLER, HITLER, RACIST, RACIST, RACIST.

Eff Off, Zios

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:43 | 6658804 ZD1
ZD1's picture

 

 

 

No matter what the subject, Bunghole and the rest of the butthurt Marxist Muslim loving Kafirs here at the Hedge will ALWAYS blame the Zionists (aka Jews) and label anyone who disagrees with them as either a Zionist (aka Jew) or a Hasbara.

ZIONIST (aka Jew), HASBARA, ZIONIST (aka Jew), HASBARA, ZIONIST (aka Jew), HASBARA, ZIONIST (aka Jew), HASBARA

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:45 | 6658863 Herd Redirectio...
Herd Redirection Committee's picture

That you equate Zionist with Jew is your problem, not anyone else's.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:08 | 6658980 ZD1
ZD1's picture

 

 

That you can't equate Zionist with Jew is your problem, not anyone else's.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 22:42 | 6661299 Aussie V
Aussie V's picture

All Zionist are more than likely Jews but not all Jews are Zionists.

It's time to learn to wipe your bum on your own, Mummy is busy!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:55 | 6658920 farflungstar
farflungstar's picture

Then why come here, knowing what to expect is not to your liking? You aren't going to change anyone's mind with your complaints. There are plenty of sites out there that will smooch jew ass up, down and sideways, and then blame the Muslims (useful tools) for whatever ails the world.

One can't help but look at the formerly stable countries run by iron dictatorships which surround israel that are now smoking ruins and wonder WTF no one had a problem with these Arabs like the israelis did. Lucky for them 9/11 came along to whet our appetites for killing Arabs in these countries near and around israel, who did not attack us that day.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:14 | 6659010 ZD1
ZD1's picture

Then why come here, knowing what to expect is not to your liking? You aren't going to change anyone's mind with your complaints. There are plenty of sites out there that will smooch Muslims ass up, down and sideways, and then blame the Jews (useful tools) for whatever ails the world.

One can't help but look at the always unstable Muslim nations run by Islamic dictatorships which surround Israel and can see how they want to destroy a successful country that doesn't share their Islamic religion or Sharia Laws.

Now have you begun your daily prayers to Mecca?

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:23 | 6659091 farflungstar
farflungstar's picture

Yeah, ya got me Tovah! I'm tapping the floor with my forehead as I type! Allah Snackbar! LOL

Seems supporting a power vacuum created by AmeriKan and israeli jews, Zionists, neocons, whatever you feel least butthurt calling them - a vacuum filled by radical terrorists - instead of atheistic Arab nationalists means that maybe YOU are the one praying to Mecca for Allah to shine good luck on his infidel - backed "holy warriors"

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:39 | 6659182 ZD1
ZD1's picture

 

 

There is no such thing as "atheistic Arab nationalists" ruling in the Middle East and only an indoctrinated mind would try to blame a "power vacuum" on American and Israeli Jews (aka Zionists).

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 15:08 | 6659634 farflungstar
farflungstar's picture

I don't recall Islam being prominently featured in the secular military regimes of Saddam, Mubarak, Gaddhafi. Guess they were hiding it so well, even AmeriKans and israelis approved of them for many decades.

I bet you check under your bed at night for Islamic radicals, eh?

 

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 20:44 | 6660891 ZD1
ZD1's picture

"I don't recall Islam being prominently featured in the secular military regimes of Saddam, Mubarak, Gaddhafi"

 

How do you know unless you were living in those countries?

I bet you'd love to hop into bed each night with Islamic radicals, eh?

Tue, 10/13/2015 - 07:37 | 6662065 BarkingCat
BarkingCat's picture

What does any of this have to do with CHINA????????????????????

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:44 | 6658561 Max Steel
Max Steel's picture

fucking drink the sewer water then

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:45 | 6658298 Mine Is Bigger
Mine Is Bigger's picture

I don't think China wants to sell U.S. treasurys and strengthen the yuan now.

And I think China made a mistake by pissing off even Malaysia and Indonesia with the territorial grab.

Its navy is not strong enough to take on the U.S., Japan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia.

And Russia will not help China if a conflict occurs in theses waters.

Beijing should have just focused on taking the islands on the Vietnamese side because whatever it does, the Vietnamese will always hate the Chinese anyway.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:47 | 6658577 Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill's picture

You may want to consult a map.

i'm very glad that I'm not in the crew on those ships.

Obviously they are/will be expendable for some greater psychopathic cause.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:01 | 6657873 Allen_H
Allen_H's picture

Somebody said that the other day, a billion UST/day the ships are in the area, that is a great solution and would force them out fast.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:01 | 6658124 manofthenorth
manofthenorth's picture

Needs to be more like $100b a day , oooh ahhhhh- fireworks !!

Now that would be a proper provocation.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:10 | 6658162 two hoots
two hoots's picture

I'm all for projecting our interest, but not about projecting our might for the sake of might.  We desperately need to reevaluate who we are, what we are, why we are and how we fit into this changing world. Our old "arsenal of democracy" ideas are worn out as is our grasping attempt to show force to salvage a waning hegemony.  China is a rising power and that cannot be denied, but how do we deal with that?  They are a threat to our current ways.  Maybe our show of might is all we have left no matter 'what we want"? Stuff's happening and fast.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:04 | 6658962 Oldballplayer
Oldballplayer's picture

This is one place where I agree with Obama.

Freedom of navigation is a fundamental, ancient, human right.  They can protect their territory the same way we can.  But there are international rules about what is your territory and what is open waters.

China cannot build an island where there was none, and claim it is part of their "territory and take over the entire sea.

If we do not do that, it opens up all sorts of piracy crap and impounding of ships, and insurance claims that would ruin international trade.

Is this worth losing a carrier over? 

By the way...where is China's carrier.  Last time I looked it was in the Med.

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:12 | 6659017 Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill's picture

I think his motive is more freedom of interdiction for the USN, a bit

like bombing the shit out of a country to bring them democracy.

If it makes you feel better about yourself, and country,believe what you will.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:30 | 6659123 Hephaestus
Hephaestus's picture

Diego Garcia. Thats one place where the US did it. Only we removed the population by force first.

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_truth_about_the_us_military_base_at_diego_garcia_20150615

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 14:44 | 6659530 HowdyDoody
HowdyDoody's picture

The US really prefers supersized unsinkable aircraft carriers such as the UK, Australia, Diego Garcia, etc.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:07 | 6657896 Gazooks
Gazooks's picture

'Are we taking our SECOND Pearl Harbor closer to “them”?'

 

 

 

Ah, that would be our third. WTC, lest we forget.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:50 | 6658081 chubbar
chubbar's picture

IIRC, it's in accordance with maritime law to sail within 12nm of a sovereign countries coastline. It's not allowable to fish or drill within 200nm of a coastline. So, what the US is actually doing is recognizing that these islands are sovereign Chinese lands if they respect the 12nm standoff. Typical dick measuing contest that could end badly if they fuck it up. That being said, no reason for China to get their balls in an uproar if they standoff 12nm.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:33 | 6658252 PrimalScream
PrimalScream's picture

exactly right!  any vessel sailing outside the 12 nm limit on the islands is GOOD by maritime law.  I doubt the USA intends to violate this limit ... although as you point out - by observing that limit the USA is tacitly agreeing that China controls the islands. 

If China attacks a US vessel outside the 12 nm zone ... that is a DIRECT MILITARY ATTACK.

But I seriously doubt this will go to bullets.  More likely, ships sailing very close to one another - which is dangerous enough.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:48 | 6658582 Chuck Walla
Chuck Walla's picture

And it means LIBERTY in the PI! Do we still have Subic Bay as a base? Olongapo was a fun, nasty town.  Kaoshiung was OK, but the Philipines! Tres bon!

 

FORWARD MAO!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:44 | 6658854 The Chief
The Chief's picture

Nope, the Corruptocrats in the Clinton Whitehouse gave Subic back. It was a cesspool anyway.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:50 | 6658589 The Chief
The Chief's picture

"Are we taking our SECOND Pearl Harbor closer to “them”?"

We won't be doing it from our strategic stronghold on the US Territory of Guam. It seems that Guam has no reliable electricity because, wait for it, their Korean contractor BLEW UP one of the Island's key power plants a few weeks ago. That's right, we run our critical infrastructure with foreign nationals, Asian foreign nationals. I use the term "we" loosely. I should say "our fellow citizens" that run Guam.

"Why does that matter?", you ask? Well, because beside from being the key forward operating base for the US's Pacific fleet (Pearl Harbor doesn't count), it is also the home of the Air Force's Anderson Air Base. That base is the home of whole bunch of big-league, strategic techno-fuckery that is gleefully deployed against our enemies today just as it was during the Vietnam war, including big-ass, batwing bombers with big-ass payloads of supreme nastiness.

So this island in the Pacific, an island which was taken back from the Japanese by my Grandpa and Uncles, is owned by the Chinese without firing a shot. The electricity is made by Chinese plants, including a brandy-new solar plant "owned" by NRG which, incidentally, was designed by Chinese engineers and built with Chinese stuff. Just wait till THAT yieldco goes tits-up. The Chinese know every inch of our most strategic military asset in the Pacific theatre because they are there and built a lot of it. Oh, and get this one, they also fly over the island everyday but not with drones or satellites, but with their commercial aircraft. Seems that the Chinese love the Marianas Islands. We aren't talking about 12 miles. We are talking about OVER the Island.

My friends and I sit around and laugh about this kind of shit. You can't make it up.

Why do we do this? Why do we let the enemies knock on our gate? In my estimation its for 2 reasons. One, we dont have leadership in the military that have the critical thinking skills necessary to defend our nation from domestic enemies, especially when those domestic enemies are foreigners, wink, wink. Two, the kleptocrats in the Guam government are very good at taking care of the local military leadership (and the Koreans and Chinese are very good at bribing the key kleptocrats on Guam). What else can it be? Perhaps there is some unknown entity that doesn't want to see Guam bonds tank ala Puerto Rico. BTW, what happened with that?

This is why I don't think anything of China and it's man-made Islands. If it was a big deal, they'd do something about our own Islands first. Wouldn't they? Frankly, I don't think the Chinese want anything from us. The scenario as painted above - like everything else- is a mirage designed to create an "us against them" diorama in the Pacific. If it is this bad on Guam, I wonder what the communists on Hawaii have done with our security. Is life so dear or peace so sweet, er, uh....anyway, you get the picture. Talking about enemies within the gates, Sheesh.

This is just one example that is likely replicated throughout the world wherever Asians and the US military interact. Follow the money from cradle to grave.

 

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:27 | 6658769 shovelhead
shovelhead's picture

We should claim the whole Pacific because of WWII.

We'll let Australia do there own thing because the boys will need a beer-stop & RR someplace that speaks (sorta) English.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:42 | 6658841 The Chief
The Chief's picture

Agreed. However, most people dont know this, but we DO claim most of the Pacific. We never gave it back. Look at Saipan (Marianas), Chuuk, Palau, American Samoa, Hawaii, Midway, The Marshalls, Kwajalein, Bikini....we basically have claimed a very big chunk of the Pacific.

I dont have an opinion on that. Too many good boys met their death in the Pacific to piss on their graves, regardless of the authenticity of the pretext delivered by that fucking no good communist, FDR. That POS limousine liberal, I pray, is rotting in hell.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:14 | 6657718 old naughty
old naughty's picture

now that Russia has been engaged in ME...so will China be next, fires everywhere, no?

There is still the invisible hand, stiriing...what/where/when?

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:23 | 6657744 Never One Roach
Never One Roach's picture

There's little profit for the MIC with peaceful negotiations. Plus, i am not sure America has any "brilliant" diplomats anymore. Haven't seen one since before Bush sometime.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:47 | 6657817 fudge
fudge's picture

The last American of any worth was Condoleezza Rice, like her not, she new how to play the game.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:51 | 6657829 messymerry
messymerry's picture

Perhaps, but she was/is still very much the mouth of the machine...

;-D  

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:55 | 6657847 fudge
fudge's picture

As are all Diplomats ;) She, though, had more understanding of the game than those currently on the ' Stage ' ( think Samantha Power )

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:50 | 6658590 Chuck Walla
Chuck Walla's picture

My dog understands better than Kerry, Clinton, Rice or Obama. He leaves things alone.

 

FORWARD GLOBALIST SOVIETS!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:45 | 6658548 ZD1
ZD1's picture

"Perhaps, but she was/is still very much the mouth of the machine..."

 

Valerie Jarrett, Obama's Iranian born Senior Advisor who is a light skin black woman and whose father was part of the Communist movement in Chicago, won't let a real black woman like Condi near the machine.

 

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2418

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:50 | 6658894 Herd Redirectio...
Herd Redirection Committee's picture

What do you know, Barry's real pappy, not that Barack Obama Sr chap, but rather Frank Marshall Davis, was a Chi-town commie!

Small world!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:59 | 6657867 lesamourai
lesamourai's picture

Well, at least she knew how to play her 'husband' Bush's fleshy flute.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:18 | 6657929 bamawatson
bamawatson's picture

and now she proudly serves her country in a matter of utmost importance; she is one of the 13 members of the panel in charge of selecting the four teams for the college football championship series. yes indeed, water seeks its own level. Also, regarding your 'fleshy flute' comment; puts me in mind of a placard i saw, it showed monica lewinsky's pic n said i vote republican because the democrats left a bad taste in my mouth

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:39 | 6658028 snodgrass
snodgrass's picture

Liar. She was part of the 911 team - project for a new american century - that pulled off killing 3,000 Americans and god knows how many people in the middle east to protect the american empire and the banks. She's just another shill. She called Willie Brown and warned him not to fly on 911.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:46 | 6657814 rbg81
rbg81's picture

Engaged Russia?  Seems like we've done just the opposite.  Obama runs away like a poodle confronted by a German shepard.  Does anyone think he will do any different with the Chinese?  It's like a wimp who wants to flex his muscles but is afraid to use them.  Almost all world leaders have Obama's number--this will only end in more embarassment and confusion for the USA.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:11 | 6657908 localizer
localizer's picture

There's just one difference compared to WW1 and WW2 - this time around THEY cannot feel safe as there's nowhere to hide from radioactive dust... and I'd think even the most delusional nutjobs understand that...

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:39 | 6658535 Chuck Walla
Chuck Walla's picture

Obama won't backdown YET.

 

First, there must be the ceremonial drawing of the Red Line. Then comes the inevitable violation of the Red Line and then the customary tucking of Obama's tail between his legs and back to felching Reggie until tee time.

 

FORWARD MAO!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:40 | 6657746 omniversling
omniversling's picture

Not doubting the logic CD, but here is a worthwhile analysis of China's 'historical claims' to the areas they're building sandcastles in (includes very interesting historical pics of local indigenous peoples in trad clothing):

China's Massive Land Reclamation in the South China Sea Will Fail - 10 Reasons Why - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdoJ84nSWjk

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:42 | 6657797 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

No problemo. China can simply claim Manifest Destiny just as the US did during the 19th century to justify the expansion of the American Empire.

Laws are for little people and little weak nations.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:43 | 6658048 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

"Force is the only thing they understand"

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:54 | 6658917 Herd Redirectio...
Herd Redirection Committee's picture

Manifest Destiny...  Doesn't that literally mean you will manifest your ideas, and in doing so, declare it as destiny?  'Manifest: to prove'

"Manifesting reality", isn't that what TPTB do all the time, or attempt to?  "We are history's actors, and while you are busy studying history, we will be making history"

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 21:30 | 6661056 roccman
roccman's picture

yup

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:48 | 6657819 imaginalis
imaginalis's picture

It may fail rationally, but how long before they take them over and Australia too?

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:21 | 6657952 luckylongshot
luckylongshot's picture

What seems pointless about this entire exercise is that global warming is going to result in all these artificial islands disappearing under water anyhow. What we are seeing is idiots on display- both screw the environment, one builds a sandcastle, the other threatens war and the sandcastle is going to disappear thanks to the idiots screwing the environment in the first place. Dumb and dumber.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:44 | 6658053 gmak
gmak's picture

Stop spouting nonsense that is backed only by fudged data.  Show me one island that has disappeared. And then explain why others around it haven't.

 

There are tide marks in harbours and inlets all over the world, from the 17th and 18th centuries. They are still visible. ?????

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:29 | 6658238 luckylongshot
luckylongshot's picture

www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyzJgaUX6cM lists 5 that are disappearing.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:50 | 6658076 detached.amusement
detached.amusement's picture

idiots on display....oh the irony

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:54 | 6658601 Chuck Walla
Chuck Walla's picture

What seems pointless about this entire exercise is that global warming is going to result in all these artificial islands disappearing under water anyhow...

Then even more pointless is Gore buying that beach house in Cali. Pretty brave for a guy who says the oceans will rise, no?

 

FORWARD AL JAZEERA!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:43 | 6658292 nicktempo
nicktempo's picture

It seems to me that instability works in our favor. If those shipping lanes become unreliable, manufacturing moves back here. Am I missing something? 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:51 | 6658593 css1971
css1971's picture

Reduced profit margins.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 14:49 | 6659551 HowdyDoody
HowdyDoody's picture

Unless (until?) Americans start working for Chinese wages. In that case, the corporations are good to go.

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:54 | 6658353 lincolnsteffens
lincolnsteffens's picture

Cog,

This is one of the few assertions of power I think we should do. Those islands are so far from China's territorial waters that it seems to me absurd to claim that area in their legal domain. What is to prevent the USA from building an artificial island 201 miles from China and claiming our territorial waters extend to within 1 mile of China's mainland?

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:58 | 6658918 HowdyDoody
HowdyDoody's picture

You mean something like the Falklands and the UK? There is only one reason the UK spends million per year supporting it, and it is not to maintain a load of over-privileged sheep-shaggers in comfort. It is for the ressources the UK can then lay claim to.

Edit London-Falklands 8000 miles. China-Edge of South CHina Sea 1000 miles.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:04 | 6658406 thetruthhurts
thetruthhurts's picture

Anything to keep the stock market up eh Obombya?

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:50 | 6658586 css1971
css1971's picture

Well, something to blame it on anyway. Distraction from all the internal looting going on.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 12:58 | 6658767 Md4
Md4's picture

Our economic power is baseless without industrial rank-and-file jobs, and our geopolitical meddling is also being laid bare without a strong home from which to launch it.

Alongside the inevitable economic collapse, we may well be entering a major period of increasing isolation and humiliation by a world much more grown up and principled than we think we are.

The China Spratley situation is yet another place where we may see our ego painfully bruised too.

If the U.S. wants to return to former greatness, it needs to straighten itself out at home first. A great deal of housecleaning is in order about now, and a helluva lot of hard work lie ahead to rebuild our industrial base.

We may be a nation of business, but we are ALWAYS an R&D/manufacturing-based economy FIRST...

...or we can be neither strong at home nor abroad.

m

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 17:58 | 6660360 IronForge
IronForge's picture

CD,

It could be that if the Hegemon_USA goes to a Major War, the Public will be forced to sell its Gold(or get it confiscated at firesale or no credit) and go back to ration cards again, allowing for a distraction while the Monetary/Fiscal Systems get reset.

They control the World Bank, BIS, and IMF, so lettsay they'll use IMF_SDRs for their convenience during the reset.

If I were RUS, CHN, or IND, I'd jump on those AIIB/SWIFT_ALTERNATIVE/YUAN_SETTLEMENT Systems in a heartbeat. 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:07 | 6657696 TongueStun
TongueStun's picture

but but but, China and Russia are our friends, and only have peaceful intents......I "learned" that here btw....

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:17 | 6657724 BlindMonkey
BlindMonkey's picture

You would be a moron if that was your takeaway.

 

A sovereign nation should act in their self interests.  What has made the US so dangerous is that we quite often do NOT act in our self interests and that makes US policies unpredictable and dangerous.  

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:46 | 6658302 nicktempo
nicktempo's picture

Imagine what we would think if Russia tried to dictate control over our shipping lanes in the Caribbean. It's ridiculous that we're even there.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:54 | 6657837 unicorn
unicorn's picture

can - please - anybody pack all the warmongers in a box and ship them to these islands and leave them there, with some wooden swords, sandshovels and buckets and some forms (for sandcakes), without a possibility to communicate or to leave? we could live then in peace and harmony, well nearly...

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 11:36 | 6658049 abyssinian
abyssinian's picture

Obama took a page from the Feds playbook?  Will happen but don't know,when? Its going to happen soon but all data dependent? What a bunch of clowns.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:20 | 6659068 sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

China ALREADY has a carrier group (or battle ship group, I forget whether they have any aircraft carriers or not) off the Syrian coast, in support of Russia.

Got to keep current, dude!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 07:59 | 6657677 blown income
blown income's picture

The nigger is trying his best to destroy whats left of the states..fucker!

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:05 | 6657692 PT
PT's picture

But Globalization will give us Whirlled Peas!!!

How strange that a country of 1.3 billion people might decide they need more territory and resources.  Who woulda thunkit?

Good thing we gave them all our manufacturing...

Waddya gonna do about it?  Bomb their factories?  Then where will you get all your car parts, clothes, computers, TVs, telephones, furniture, refrigerators, washing machines ...

... and before you mention companies based in other countries, just double check where the actual manufacturing gets done ...

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:50 | 6657825 fockewulf190
fockewulf190's picture

I´m expecting another massive dump in Treasuries in the very near future.  Thats got to be good for the "no shit Sherlock" statement of the month no?

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:02 | 6658952 HowdyDoody
HowdyDoody's picture

Sorry, it is not just Obomber. Listen to this lunatic. A Retired US General. He obviously has influence via the MIC. He and the rest of the warmongers should be thrown out. The USG is full of totally deluded imbeciles.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URiSWRpuK3U

 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 13:30 | 6659127 Likstane
Likstane's picture

I tried...about 20 sec worth was all I could do. Years ago, I sat and talked with the former commander of Elmendorf AFB not once, but several times, regarding 9-11 and the impossibilities of the official explanation. This man was a longtime pilot, and a seemingly knowledgeable fellow, but would not concede he was deceived/deluded. Patriotic fervor and allegiance to USA Corp. trumps reason. I eventually labeled him an idiot to his face.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:55 | 6658103 hack123456
hack123456's picture

It would seem by your choice of words you are a racist. I am no fan of our president, but your (blow income) comments are just inappropriate. And I suspect only made becase you can hide behind an alias. A bigger fear may be that 16 people here give him a thumbs up. 

 

Be a man and come forth with your name. 

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 10:31 | 6658245 HughBriss
HughBriss's picture

So sayeth the hack (pun intended) who posts anonymously...?  Cute double standard, btw.  Very fitting.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:05 | 6657682 smacker
smacker's picture

"Obama Won't Back Down After Chinese Threat [...]"

Somebody stole his box of red lines.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:12 | 6657710 grunk
grunk's picture

If Obama draws a line in the sand, the Chinese will claim sovereignty and build an airstrip on it.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 08:35 | 6657777 cowdiddly
cowdiddly's picture

As long as its the red crayon we are Ok. When he whips out the pink one, LOOK OUT.

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:32 | 6657999 onewayticket2
onewayticket2's picture

Next explosion in a Chinese factory in 3,2,1....

Mon, 10/12/2015 - 09:05 | 6657891 Allen_H
Allen_H's picture

Obummer only draws pink pussy lines.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!