This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
How To Create A Gun-Free America In 5 'Easy' Steps
Submitted by Austin Bragg via Reason.com,
Want to create a gun-free America in 5 easy steps?
Here's all there is to it:
Step 1: Elect. For a gun-free America, the first thing you'll need is two-thirds of Congress. So elect a minimum of 67 Senators and 290 Representatives who are on your side.
Step 2: Propose. Then, have them vote to propose an amendment to the Constitution which repeals Second Amendment gun rights for all Americans.
Step 3: Ratify. Then convince the legislators of 38 states to ratify that change.
At this point, the Second Amendment is history, but you've done nothing to decrease gun violence. All you've done is remove the barrier for Congress to act.
Step 4: Legislate. You need to enact "common sense" reform.
You can try to do what Australia did and...ban all guns? That's not at all what they did, but whatever, fuck it. Go big or go home, right?
It will have to be passed by Congress and signed by the president.
Great! The law is passed and guns are now illegal. The only thing left to do is...
Step 5: Enforce. Guns won't just disappear because you passed a law. You need to confiscate some 350 million guns scattered among 330 Million Americans.
Sure, you can try a buy-back program like Australia, but like Australia that will still leave behind anywhere from 60 percent to 80 percent of privately owned firearms.
The rest you have to take.
You'll need the police, the FBI, the ATF or the National Guard—all known for their nuanced approach to potentially dangerous situations—to go door-to-door, through 3.8 million square miles of this country and take guns, by force, from thousands, if not, millions of well-armed individuals. Many of whom would rather start a civil war than acquiesce.
So inevitably gun violence, which is currently at a historic low, will skyrocket.
But that is how you get a gun-free America in five easy steps.
(For more in that vein, read this piece by Charles C.W. Cooke of National Review.)
»
- 41739 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Anyhow, there is no mechanism for somebody to say "hey that guy over there with his tongue in the end of his gun...
That sounds like a self-correcting situation.
"15 years mandatory" at the cost of $100,000 per year? Brilliant! The secret to economic health is a big expensive gulag system -- full of aging prisoners with health needs.
Right. Lets just ignore all laws because we wouldn't want to create stress on the "gulag system"...
ignoring u is muuuuuuuuuuuuuuch easier, shit for brains, looooooooooser...
Knowing that it's 15 years incarcerated with black animals, then why would anybody surrender? That would be worse than death.
So Molon Labe , you blue hive based milquetoast.
Bring it on. Start with me.
.
Against the second amendment? .....easy.. just get out!.
Here's a bit of lesson in Federal authority in rural areas. This was told to me by a young fed agent back in the 70s. He had transferred to small city in the south. He was looking to question an individual who lived in the hills. His boss said OK, how are you going to approach this. Young agent said: I'll drive up there and knock on the door. Old agent said: no you won't, you'll never make it. They'll hear your car door shut down by the gate. They'll wait until you're a few minutes up the driveway, then they'll let the dogs out.
If you want to see this individual, leave word with the postmaster and he'll pass it on. He'll come down to see you when he's ready. That's the way it is here.
So true, and that's in peacetime.
In a shit-hitting-the-fan-situation, every state, local, and federal thug with a uniform will have to use the low crawl to get from point A to point B lest they get their heads shot off. I'm talking face down in the dirt low crawl or else.
Never in the history of post-imperial police states have has the citizenry been armed such as they are today in America.
Never in the history of post-imperial police states have has the citizenry been armed such as they are today in America.
To make matters worse a lot of the people with those arms are just itching to use them . . . . . and not to hunt Bamby.
they'll just drone the poor fucking hermit these days... then go in and shoot the dogs for the hell of it
"He was looking to question an individual who lived in the hills."
That should be qualified. Did he forget to pay the due on his PO Box for one month, or does the questioning have to do with him raping school girls? In the latter case, I'm all for your drone scenario, but not before they hit his house with a TOW and then they can bulldoze the whole fucking place and turn it into a strip mall. Spare the dogs though.
Here in America a man is entitled to trial by a jury of his peers. For someone so adamant about following the law you sure seem willing to forgo large portions of it in support of an anti-freedom agenda......
Agreed. But the agent has no right to go up there and question "the hermit" if he's been accused of raping school girls? Bullshit. The entire local PD has the right to go up there and question him -- to his face. Don't tell us the cops have to send this guy a registered receipt letter from the post office. Please...
BTW. If it were your daughter in question, I highly doubt you'd be wiating for "judge and jury" By your own words, I'd reckon you might want to scoot up there and have a few words with our hermit yourself...
Question him is one thing. Droning him is another. If I had a daughter I'm sure I would be responsible enough to teach her the ABC's of threat management.
Guns = rapist spray.......
self defense, ah come on the collective whole will be there for you(the funeral maybe) ha, fucking dumb talk, ignore the muthfuck...
Entitled to?
Maybe.
Likely to get?
Extremely small.
The 'peers' are all weeded out during selection.
Satanic fasle-Jew Talmud Khazars gaslight we Goyim any way the Devil tells them.
If you want to see this individual, leave word with the postmaster and he'll pass it on. He'll come down to see you when he's ready. That's the way it is here.
The Feds knew this is EXACTLY how they should have handled David Koresh (sp?) at Waco (alternatively they could have grabbed him during one of his visits to town, which happened like clock-work on a weekly basis) but instead they chose to go into the Branch Davidian compound with their fucking SWAT guys for political/publicity reasons and look how that turned out . . . .
Are you suggesting all those unfortunate deaths were not accidental???
Including all the Secret Service agents from Rockefeller-yardbaby Clinton's whoredom whose fatal wounds were produced by snipers in helicopters.
The satanic papist/Talmud "Beast" feeds on its own, like the two FBIes pushed out of the helicopter after the Boston Hoaxathon.
They're working on an American free America first.
All I know, is that if some pistol carrying HALO playing prick, decides to do a Drive -By on the campus food court, he's going to think twice, knowing he might be going home in a lead necklace.
Hope you're a crack shot with all that lead flying in the food court and such...
Are you speaking from the "shooters" perspective?
Let me put it to you this way. Hit him first please.
Because this piece of shit ^^^^ will be hiding under the table, hoping that a man does something.
. . . . he might be going home in a lead necklace.
And later that night he died of lead poisoning . . .
Actually, knives kill more people than guns; so we should ban knives. But then we won't be able to cut our meat; so we all become vegans; if we all become vegans then major portions of the US economy would disappear and GDP would go even more negative; restaurants, pig and cattle farming, chickens (guess the Libs will be happy when Chick fil-a goes bankrupt), the ag psychos who doctor meat with hormones, etc. Plus people would presumably live longer causing more stress on social security, while tax receipts would decline every year.
So..... you lefty gun grabbing commie bastards, how will you do income redistribution when there's no income left?
Actually, knives kill more people than guns; . . .
Not true at all . . . knives are used to kill (murder) more people than rifles but far more murders are comitted using hand guns (about 8,150 in 2011) as opposed to knives (something around 1,500 or so).
Cars kill more people than knives and guns put together.....
And alcohol use leads to more deaths than cars and guns combined . . .
Democratizing the world causes more deaths than cars and guns and alcohol combined. Neener neener......
The office of the president of the USA should be banned. If were just counting bodies as the reasoning.
And the number 1 cause of death in the USA is doctors.
That could change soon with the crumbling infrastructure. Doctors may kill a lot of people, but the do it one at a time. When engineering fails, it kills people by the hundreds and thousands.
Smokes are WAY the biggest killers, but they make lots of money for corporations and, through taxation, government, so that's OK.
Actually no, they count every cancer death regaurdless of the real cause as a smoking related deaths. So they can't really say exactly how many deaths tobacco causes. Not saying go out and smoke it safe but lets be honest here.
Drs., perscription meds, cars...
Where do we stop?
How's that "gun free" working in Mexico??
Super awesome not a gun in sight. /s
Step 2: Propose. Then, have them vote to propose an amendment to the Constitution which repeals Second Amendment gun rights for all Americans.
IT WILL NEVER . . . . FUCKING . . . . HAPPEN
Socialism does a lot more destruction than guns, so I propose that we eliminate socialists first.
Exactly, cause let's face it, they have no reason...
Well if it's good enough for Putin, surely it's good enough for the Amerika. Right KremlinHasbraTrinas?
I've been saying all along that gun confiscation would bring on more deaths in a year than in the next 1000 of normal activity. (and hailed a political victory, of course).
Secondly, this long to-do list just isn't US style. Our mushhead prez will skip straight to the last step "take them" and create a disaster that makes Syria look like preschool recess. Eat your fucking heart out Obama. Oh wait, you don't have one.
I haven't had time to fully vet this article, but it gives some "insight" as to how formally "legal" gun owners are still protecting themselves.
Fact check: Where do Australians get illegal guns? - Fact Check - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Quite possibly, the objective is to criminalize everyone for the good of togetherness?
The socialist utopia= You must tolerate everyone, until we have a law for everything, at which point you're all criminals, and relegated,
submissive progressive piss ants.
The mainstay of any good insurgency for the last 100 years has been rusty old bolt-action rifles.
Even if you took away every modern sporting rifle (AR,AK,etc) and semi-auto battle rifle currently in civilian hands, there would still be more than enough "high-powered" deer rifles in circulation for a successful insurgency. Just venturing out in the open could a fatal. That's what wins insurgencies. Fear of well-placed shots and the well-placed shots themselves can grind down any oppressor, foreign or domestic.
Any common big game rifle with an average optic is just as good as any sniper platform in common use up to about the Vietnam War......
Yes, however ammo is lightyears ahead of where it was 40 year ago.
Speed is good, however accuracy is final.
And always aim for the guy with shiny collars.
Easier step: Just wipe out the moron whining gun grabbers and problem solved.
It shouldn't be too hard, given that because they are anti-gun, that they don't own any.
Meanwhile, we, the majority, do.
Interesting conundrum facing the gun grabbers.
If we don't consenet they can't do shit. Unless they themselves take up arms.
Given most of them are hoplophobes, I just don't see it.
This guy really overthought this. All .gov would have to do is stage some kind of nationwide disaster or disease outbreak. In a couple of weeks all but a few thousand holdouts would gladly turn in their guns for a spot in the FEMA camp where there is food, meds and security. The rest could easily be branded terrorists and mopped up. An EMP or revamped Ebola outbreak would do the trick. After a couple of weeks with no food, running water and security most people would be begging to get in the FEMA camp and turn in their own mothers to do so.
A few thousand? I'd say a few hundred thousand at a very minimum. Certainly enough to deal with Game Wardens, State Troopers, and EPA/ATF/HUD etc Inspector General GS-1811 Special Agents stationed outside the Regional Offices of the US Gov't.
Now that's some funny shit.
The FEMA and .gov vehicles and facilities would be shot full of holes, their operators ripped limb from limb, and everything in sight stolen or burned.
.Gov couldn't even hold a major city more than a couple weeks, let alone whole regions or the nation.
1. initaiate false flag attack by jihadists on US soil,
2. declare martial law and suspend the civil rights (Lincoln did it),
3. with full control over transportaion (highways, trains) and food production/distribution (selectively) starve the population,
4. set up food distribution centers and wait for
5. starving americans to trade their guns for food (can you watch your children starve to death) (Stalin did that).
desperate people will do desperate things e.g. surrender their guns, attack the food distribution centers, etc.
Well if you don't have a few weeks food in your pantry, you pretty much deserve whatever comes...
I like this better.
Locate food distribution center.
Gather support.
Assault Dist Hub.
Take food and supplies.
Cruxify all govt stooges living and dead for the next supply company to clean up.
I'd prefer not to expose myself to the Walking Dead.
Give it a break Vlad...
Or, they'll organize and start shooting those making such unreasonable demands.
After living through Katrina and its aftermath, I'm here to tell you that you'd have to be a fucking idiot of world record proportions to go to anyting that says FEMA or USGOV on it.
I talked to white people who survived the superdome.
When you enter, you get disarmed. Inside there is no civilzation. Only jungle, the rule of the strongest. If you're not the strongest, then you'd better bend over.
I won't be turning myself over to the protection of the USGOV. You go ahead.
You can tell me about it after you change your name to 'bitch' and start wearing dresses.
What I am missing and what isnt there. are the rise of the militias... Why isnt this happening? Now is the time for like minded people to band together. Instead what I see are people becoming more introverted....
This article is a when not an if.... Every alarm on every front is ringing, every light is flashing red, and no one is reacting why?
The minute the lights go out is the minute the armed (and motivated) civvies on your street become top dogs for better or worse.
Whether they work toward common goals or kill each other is the issue.
You need look no farther than Ukraine (and Yugoslavia before that) to see the results of modern civil war. All I hear at the pizza shop, gas station, barber shop, and grocery store is END THE FED, REEL IN THE POLITICIANS, AND HANG THE BANKERS.
Australia evan banned crossbows. They talk tough but are statist wimps when it comes to personal freedom.
cant we just ban people?
n/m forgot its the guns fault
we don't need gun control, we need nigger control
Of course there are other shitty ways of screwing us, like holding mfg's liable for deaths, and this:
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/7159a8096ed045008fc86c00afe0d289/gun-shop...
So, instead of outlawing them, they could fuck things up so bad otherwise no one will sell you one, let alone make one. Of course, this ends in disaster as well.
It's probably best to buy what you can, get some ammo, and wait for the storm. Juding US history, including recent bs overseas, you can beat said storm is coming.
There's always the possibility will get into ww3 so none of it will matter. Well, except for the dumbass I ran into yesterday that was bitching if we get into a huge war that there will be no election and Obama will serve a 3rd term. Really dude? Wow. Nukes flying and your worried about who the fkn prez is?
usa at one of its lowest lows in history - well done obummer you filthy necro neger
Once-upon-a-time I swore allegiance to this United States of America: against all enemies, domestic and foreign, of this great country. My loyalty lies with this nation, but not the government. Whether a Republican or Democrat government, it must earn my loyalty. That loyalty is not given easily, and neither of these 2 parties have earned it from me.
Tear it all down and start over.
It's the Constitutional thing to do.
---
And there it is... Another Russian troll. They are showing up like clockwork telling real Americans that we should just "tear it all down" -- no doubt before its too late and "we" (they're in Moscow) all end up in FEMA camps.
Wake up people! Spread the word! The cancer that Russia is spreading via $500 MILLION dollar per year campaigns to puit us all against each other is everywhere -- including all over this thread.
Tearing down the State wouldn't be anti Constitutional in the least, especially in 2015. Pull off your blinders, or continue to lick the chains resting upon your arms and heart.
---
So you're with the Russians now? Oh my.
What's the correlation? Most of the public figures today are much closer in ideology to the Russians than to any formerly held American ideals. I guess you don't see that either?
Good post. When a man's salary depends on him not understanding something...
or something like that.
That's pretty much the way our forefathers planned it.
I've renounced my pledge of allegence to the State. I wouldn't lift a finger. Is that a crime? I suspect it is.
"Once-upon-a-time I swore allegiance to this United States of America: against all enemies..."
Was that a personal vow? In the federal oath (one taken by officers, federal judges and congressmen) one swears that they "will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies..."
Bring It!!!
Unfortunately its much easier than in this video - rather than pass an amendment all you need to do is win the White House in 2016, replace one Supreme Court Justice and then overturn the "Heller" decision that said "keeping and bearing arms" is an individual right. Now the second amedment applies only to "militias" which I'm sure the Supremes could twist to mean only the National Guard.
Then you could jump right to Step 3 - though its much more likely to be done incrementally by first banning assault rifles, banning standard capacity magazines, eliminating foreign imports of ammo and parts, bankrupting gun manufacturers by opening them up to lawsuits, universal background checks followed by universal registration, limits on ammo and ammo purchases. Then you slowly start banning more individual guns and categories of guns (semi-auto pistols, semi-auto rifles, semi-auto shotguns, "large" calibers and so on)...until there's nothing left that's legal. It will take a few more years, but at least we'll have "done something".
Witness New York and Conneticut where gun registration laws were passed and ignored by over 90% of estimated gun owners. No one has risen up to fight for their rights, but we've managed to create a few million felons from law abiding citizens. It looks like more of a "Mexican standoff" than civil war - the citizens disobey, but the government knows it can't go door to door. In rural areas, many in law enforcement have pledged that they won't even enforce the new edicts.
Our leaders are hell bent on extending this insanity to the entire US - but at what cost? Will supporters of the constitution be happy with continued civil disobediance as their government names them all felons? Who knows.
While I disagree with most of what you wrote, the thing we generally DO agree on is that what is in the constitution doesn't matter.
The fuckers in congress and the Supreme Court ignore that anyway....because Americans ALLOW IT.
So what happens......
happens.
Squid
The constitution does matter. It codifies the inalienable rights given to us by the Creator (however you want to define that) as stated in the Declaration of Independence. This still stands and can still be argued in court.
Now the courts in the USSA are corporate civil / maritime courts which are subsidiaries of the U.S. (District of Columbia) Corporation. But they do not want the vast majority of people in America to know this. Hence they have to listen to constitutional arguments from Sovereign Citizens and will even allow them to win cases if they can unlock the tangled web of deceit that has been played through multiple bankruptcies and corporate reorgs. But if you then write a book (or otherwise publish) about your win and how to acheive said win, then they will disappear you real quick. Never forget that the CIA merged with the Mafia at the end of WWII. They have perfected the takeout and chaos in general.
Paint filled balloons and any firearm will pretty much terrorize and neutralize any mechanized state sponsored terrorist living off the TaxPayer. Just ask the Russians in Afghanistan who fought there during that 10 year war.
Any family that has a loved one injured or killed in a gun free zone needs to start suing the owners of that property for denial of the right to self defense. All 50 states have concealed carry now since Illinois was forced in to it, so property owners/management that denies you that constitutionl right needs to pay.
i've got a better idea, finish making america a democracy, then let the majority 330,000,000 million armed citizens make some improvements where needed.
i'm sick of any politician even using the word constitution, it's been used as toilet paper since 2008.
We have the Second Amendment to protect - and EFFECT - the divine right of Individual Sovereignty granted to us in covenant with the perfect, infinite, eternal, living, present, ineffable, invisible, holy, righteous, and unique Creator of the universe, our named Sovereign, God Almighty.
Those who prefer to be slaves or slave masters, in league with monarchy, popery, or the "thousands upon thousands of years of despotism" we came here to Isaiah's actual foretold "Zion" to escape, are welcome to depart soon as the long-awaited Apocalypse is imminent.
All shall come to understand the design on our freedom Gog and Babylon have, as foretold: the same false-Jew Khazar "Synagogue of Satan"/papist/homo Christ-killing faction which together ran "the Wall Street of slavery" at Rome for 2,000 years after they crucified tens of thousands of Christs, and Immanuel to build the Roman Empire/Church, and which now controls Capitol Hill, Hollywood Babylon, Wall Street and Organized Crime, shall be recognized as the "Beast" they are and shall, by grace, be cast down accordingly, praise God.
I've already seen posters featuring an image of an assault rifle with the words, "Go ahead, come and get it." It will be bloodier than the first civil war.
You are a fool.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUmKT43j4Tc
Those who do not remember the past are condemened to repeat it.
Hisotry - The confiscation of weapons. Innocents Betrayed (A documentary)
Effectiveness of the Australian gun ban... People are simply making their own submachine guns now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dv33pCUkLRM
Just google Luty sub machine gun. The plans are downloadable and it can be made from materials available from your local DIY store.
Another of puppet homo Obama's hoax "shootings" to disarm the Goyim: NAU.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fW2XwDK95tE&feature=em-subs_digest
Not that I in ANY way support it, but there's an easier way. The 2nd Amendment specifically mentions the arms, but not the ammo. Just ban the sale of ammo and reloading supplies. Sure, I suspect that would be challenged with the point that bearing arms is useless without ammo to feed them, so that must have been an implied right. But I'm sure the gun grabbers have already suggested what I just mentioned.
Oregon Shooting Hoax: Chris Harper-Mercer's Fake Manifesto Exposed (Redsilverj)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2M-tvyg0ek&feature=share