This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Guest Post: The False East/West Paradigm And The End Of Freedom
Submitted by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,
People are desperate for leaders and heroes. This is an undeniable condition of human life and of human civilization. Some historians and social observers, however, seem to think it is enough to simply point out this condition and pretend as if they have made some grand declaration; as if they have come to the root of the problem of mankind. In their laziness, they have mistaken a symptom for the cause.
Why do people so often demand leaders and heroic figures? What drives the institutionalization of hierarchy, celebrity and geopolitical idolization? I believe this condition is caused by three factors – fear, ignorance, and apathy.
This is not to say that there are not people throughout history that are worth looking up to, or that looking up to a particular hero figure is wrong. Heroes and sometimes leaders can act as points of reference, helping us to aspire to greater personal accomplishment and extraordinary achievement. The problem is many historical figures labeled heroic are in fact monsters in masks paraded as saviors by history writers with agendas. Real heroes (in the past hundred years in particular) are most often unsung, and remain little known.
This is why the idolization of puppet leaders is so disturbing to those of us in the Liberty Movement. We witnessed the blind militancy of the so-called “right wing” in the support of George W. Bush after 9/11, only to be led into quagmire, economic despair, and a surveillance state based on numerous lies. We then had to witness the insane cult-like fervor of the so-called “left wing” as Barack Obama took office, only to continue and accelerate the same draconian policies of the Bush Administration while conjuring new methods for the division and destruction of American society and prosperity.
Yes, the Liberty Movement has examined every detail and is well versed in the horrors of the false Left/Right paradigm. Again, I'll have to quote the ever useful elitist member of the Council on Foreign Relations and mentor to former president Bill Clinton, Carroll Quigley, on this particular issue, from his book 'Tragedy And Hope':
“...The argument of two parties should represent opposed ideas and policies, one perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinate and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. The policies that are vital and necessary for America are no longer subjects of significant disagreement, but are disputable only in details of procedure, priority, or method.”
What truly disturbs me is that our movement can be so awake and aware of the false left/right paradigm while remaining astonishingly naïve and short sighted when it comes to the false East/West paradigm. And once again, I have to attribute this naivety to a desperation for heroes caused by fear and apathy.
I have written on the reality that Eastern political interests are just as controlled by globalists as Western political interests for years. Readers can review the considerable amount of data and evidence I have collected on Russia and Vladimir Putin in particular and the ties between the East and international financiers and well known globalists in recent articles such as 'Russia Is Dominated By Global Banks, Too', 'False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency', and 'The New World Order And The Rise Of The East'.
In fact, I predicted almost every aspect of the current Syrian crisis based on the knowledge that the East versus West dynamic was purely an engineered conflict designed to diminish American power and economic influence through the use of planned chaos, and I did this years before events were ever triggered in the region.
I knew what was about to happen in Syria only because I understood one important fundamental – that there are no “sides” in any modern conflict, only proxies fighting on a global chessboard controlled by the same elitist interests. Syria represented a perfect catalyst for a planetary scale conflict triggered between East and West in a way that could divert attention from internationalists. Modern war, whether through kinetics or economics, is almost always theater designed to distract and terrorize the masses, which are the true target of any conflagration.
We must set aside childish assumptions on war. Wars are not about resources. They are not about territory. They are not about the hegemony of any particular nation state. If you buy into such notions, you have been duped. No, war is about something much bigger. War first and foremost is a tool for the manipulation and molding of public psychology. As Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda said:
“The great enemy of any attempt to change men's habits is inertia. Civilization is limited by inertia.”
War is meant to forcefully change the “inertia” of civilization, and thus, forcefully change the direction of civilization in a manner that benefits the engineers of the conflict.
One great threat to the mechanism of globalism and the elites behind it is the liberty movement, which is slowly but steadily growing in popularity and influence as America edges ever closer to economic and sociopolitical oblivion. As the U.S. is homogenized, harmonized, and brought down to third world status for the benefit of a one-world system, resistance continues to grow.
You see, one negative side-effect of the rush towards centralization and a single global power (often referred to by the elites as the “New World Order”) is that the harder the globalists push society toward their Utopian ideal, the more individuals (not controlled governments or political puppets) wake up to the threat. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The Liberty Movement is the equalizing reaction to forced globalization.
In order for the elites to neutralize the threat we present, they must either destroy us or co-opt us. I believe the East/West paradigm is being used in part to attempt the co-option of liberty elements.
Despite the fact that many liberty analysts are beginning to understand the nature of the false East/West paradigm and the truth behind the rise of Russia, the predictable escalation in Syria is energizing a strange brand of Putin-worship once again. Liberty elements WANT to believe that Putin is somehow in opposition to globalization, that he is somehow morally superior to the Obama Administration, and that Russia is on the side of right in the fight against ISIS and the evil Western empire.
They want to believe this because they are afraid – they are afraid that they are alone in the fight against the NWO. They are afraid that they will have to commit to personal sacrifice and struggle against a vastly technologically superior opponent. They are afraid that they alone will have to take responsibility for America's destiny and that no great leader on a white horse is coming to blaze the path ahead of them.
Because of this fear, they sometimes commit the crime of cognitive dissonance in order to protect their false belief in a heroic Putin. They will ignore the fact that Putin is a long time friend of Henry Kissinger, the most publicly vocal proponent of the “New World Order, and that Putin describes Kissinger as his “trusted foreign policy adviser”.
They will ignore the fact that Russia's primary economic adviser is none other than the hitman of the international banking syndicate, Goldman Sachs, and that Goldman Sachs has been deeply involved in Russia's economic affairs since at least 1992, just after the fall of the Soviet Union.
They will ignore the fact that Putin and Russia have allied closely with the IMF (an institution supposedly dominated by the U.S.). Putin and the IMF are so intertwined that it was Putin who demanded that the IMF take over the management of Ukraine's finances after the regional crisis began, and, it was the IMF that blatantly supported Putin's call for a change in Ukraine's bond status from private to “official”. Russia also demanded that Ukraine's debts be repaid in Special Drawing Rights, the global currency basket which the IMF plans to use to replace the U.S. dollar as the world reserve mechanism.
They will also surely ignore the fact that Putin and the Kremlin have on multiple occasion called for the IMF to take over global management of the worlds financial systems through the implementation of the SDR as the new world reserve currency.
And of course, the fact that Russia is a member of the Bank for International Settlements and the BIS is the policy dictator of ALL central banking (do I really need to quote Carroll Quigley on the BIS yet again?) does not bode well for the affiliations and intentions of Russia as a whole, yet we are still bombarded in the liberty movement with platitudes on how Putin is “sticking it to the bankers”. No, I'm afraid not. According to the evidence, Putin is just like Obama: Yet another whore for the internationalists. Post all the pictures you want of the guy holding an uzi or finishing a judo throw, but his public persona does not fit reality.
The mainstream media in the U.S. has for the most part run on the narrative that Putin is the next Stalin, and if you are going to perpetuate a false East/West paradigm this makes perfect sense. But there is also a separate narrative being presented to the liberty movement and the rest of the world.
The talking points coming out of outlets like RT (Russia Today), a media machine controlled by the Russian government, has for the past few years stolen brilliant observations by American liberty proponents and repackaged them as video fluff. Most of these observations are negative in their view of U.S. government policy as well as central banking dictatorship, and they are also entirely correct. The problem is, RT does not apply the same standards of journalistic skepticism to the Russian government or its ties to the central banking cabal.
Time Magazine publishes pro-Putin articles naming him “man of the year” in every other nation where they have distribution, but removes these stories and covers when publishing in America.
The general American public is being sold on the idea that Putin is a calculating danger to global stability and that Western governments must become more aggressive to counter the threat. The rest of the world and the liberty movement are being sold on the image of a benevolent Putin and a Russia standing firm against the corrupt war machine of the West, but this image simply is not real.
The danger for the liberty movement in the near future is considerable. Our blind support of the false East/West paradigm makes us vulnerable to easy co-option, for if we as a movement are tricked into closely affiliating with Russia then we lose our identity as a force for American independence and become nothing more than an “Eastern created” faux revolution. Think it can't happen? Mainstream media outlets are ALREADY building the narrative. The Atlantic was the first, with an article directly connecting “right wing” movements and “conspiracy theorists” in the U.S. with Russian influence and propaganda.
As the false East/West confrontation grows, the real purpose of such a crisis will become apparent. ISIS agents conveniently shipped out of Syria among millions of "refugees" before Russian forces finally decided to strike will wreak havoc in Western nations. Economic chaos will become prevalent. The U.S. will lose the dollar's petro-status as the East subsumes Eurasia. Fear of another world war will haunt public perception. The ever uneducated and terrified mass majority will become far less tolerant of intelligent dissent. And, the Fabian Socialists infesting global institutions will suggest a clever solution to the problem they created - the dissolution of all sovereign nations and the complete centralization of governance into the hands of a select few to save humanity from such destructive divisions.
If you understand that a primary goal of globalists is to fully remove constitutional protections in America and assert a totalitarian framework, then you have to admit that a conflict with Russia is an excellent opportunity for them. War fever makes men delirious and malleable, and outside threats make internal despotism more tolerable.
In the meantime, if the liberty movement refuses to treat Russia with the same x-ray vision it has used against western governments (a Russia clearly working with international financiers and globalist institutions) then we make it far easier for the elitist propaganda machine to paint us as Eastern backed traitors rather than freedom fighters down the road, thus crushing our chances at garnering increased support from the public and awakening new voices.
Mark my words, in the end we will not only be forced to rebel against centralization under our own criminal government; we will also have to rebel against criminal puppet governments everywhere. I have no doubt that when we see the ranks of the globalist enemy, there will be Russian faces standing right alongside Western oligarchs. Maybe then people will finally admit that the East/West crisis was a carefully crafted hoax all along.
- 39065 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


Sure they will prosper... for a time. A dictator likes to have some toadies to use as fodder to control the people and rewards them to a point.
They have sold themselves for their personal prosperity... at least until they are no longer needed and then they will find quickly what their sell-out has cost. How many stupid useless, but politically expedient, people are really required?
The non-elitist people of the world are ignorant (somewhat self-imposed, but mostly propagated through media and the education system), not stupid and most likely if they understood the truth the world would be a much different and better place.
And not selling out is the path to secure and stable prosperity and security?
Of course not, but it may not be the good, moral and ethical thing to do.
It is easy to be weak and sell out and let them determine your fate. If you do the thing they tell you and they like you, then you are rewarded.
It is much more difficult to choose your own path.
I, myself am a hypocrite, taking the benefits of the current society while having an aversion for the chains and leadership because they are not good, moral and ethical.
I would like to find a solution, but do not have one. I cannot even precisely define where the genesis of the change needs to take place. I guess and assume based on observation only. I am not privy to any secrets and would never want to be if they required me to sell myself and separate myself from humanity.
1. They are rich, which is enough for them.
3. They are already fabulously wealthy and already enjoy the best that current human civilization has to offer.
2. They are not trying to achieve a utopia but are merely trying to become the self annointed God Kings of a neo-feudal one world government dictatorship. There is not a benevolent bone in these people's bodies. They do believe they are better than you though and believe you would be better off letting them micromanage every aspect of your life from cradle to grave. That much is true. Their motives? Not altruistic.
1. Assumption
2. Yes but they still have fear and that is what drives them
3. OK, maybe I read too much into what has been said by them and their belief in a technocratic leadership ... which is exactly what Plato stated in his "Republic", but maybe I am not reading too much into it. I agree the statements from then on. They are not "good" people, but want to be perceived as good. I have known many of them and while they may dress themselves as star-bellied sneetches to differentiate themselves and pretend they are different, inside they are still full of fear.
You are naive. The core of human civilization is tribalism and there will ALWAYS be conflict between the various tribes of man. You can suppress this conflict and keep it to a low intensity in times of abundance but when things get hard everyone circles the wagon around family, community, and "their" people. You are literally trying to combat and counter tens upon tens of thousands of years of human existence and evolution. When a man sees another man that is clearly an ousider, he is naturally on his guard. Those genes were passed on by survivors. Humans that have no self defense mechanisms against foreign tribes were generally killed due to their lack of survival instinct and their genes were never passed on. You can never successfully overcome the very core nature of man himself.
Furthermore, globalism only leads to the extermination of cultures, languages, and peoples. It is the death of diversity, not the embracing of it.
http://s27.postimg.org/kgi5uub7n/real_diversity2.jpg
The self-organizing tribal unit is roughly 150 people. Where do we see that today? I can think of nowhere in western society. (Yes, WL Gore and other corporations tried to organize the company based on the self-organizing tribal unit)
The American Indians were a non-warlike tribal people. It is a fallacy that they were an aggressive, inferior and uncivilized people. They chose spirituality over technology. Tribalism does not imply conflict between tribes. That is a fallacy propagated by European teaching to justify mass-murder.
You may call me naïve. I call you ignorant.
Some friends and family and I are going to start our own community that will eventually grow to that size in the forests of North Western America here soon. You know you can do that right? Start your own town. I know in the modern age everyone thinks they have to buy a condo and live in some disease riddled filthy city full of violent dindus but they don't. Buy your own land. Build your own houses. Build your own roads. It can be done. Our ancestors did this not so long ago. How do you think any of these cities or towns exist today? The government built them? Maybe you should travel more and see all the awesome accomplishments of white men throughout history. Castles on the side of mountains built without electricity or gas engines. Tunnels thru massive mountains wrought by hand. Structures that last for hundreds or thousands of years. Built while the lesser peoples of the Earth were living in mud huts and straw shacks (they still do today).
And the American indians were savages that butchered entire tribes whenever they could. You are just talking crazy when you hold them up as some kind of example to be followed. Furthermore, they were shitskin subhumans. No better than African. A huge continent and they never did anything with it other than follow the buffalo herds, eat, sleep, fuck, wage tribal warfare against one another, and die. Only whites (and Asians) can build civilizations. All the rest are just jackals feeding on our leavings.
None of us know who Putin really is.
Just like none of us know who Obama is.
Both are playing a sophisticated game which is filled with contrasts.
I have no illusion that Putin is a savior.
They want to move you from one Messiah to another it seems.
Long ago I developed the mantra "do it yourself" after placing trust in
others.
I hold by that today.
None of us know who Putin really is.
Just like none of us know who Obama is.
You are saying after nearly 8 years of this SOBs leadership being the polar opposite of everything he told the American people and the World he would do that you "still don't know who he is"!
Ask me who he is?...
Yes.
On one hand he supports Iran and on the other hand he sends weapons to Israel.
The time magazine cover with Obama as a hindu god with many hands and gifts seems
to fit.
Still don't know, maybe he doesn't know.
Still don't know, maybe he doesn't know.
If you want to know who the "white chimp" in the oval office is? Answer: Look in your own mirror! Ask yourself how the American people could passively vote for him for a second term after signing something into law section(s) 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA that he was adamant he wouldn't sign? Not to leave out what we were doing to Libya and Syria about that time which like the NDAA the American people didn't even care to know about!
Last I checked it's still a Republic but with a lot of mindless idiots that vote for manchurian candidate scum like Obama!
P.S.
Please don't denegrate the Eastern religions with a comparison to a trained monkey that just happened to become our President for two terms with the worst history of war crimes since his predecessor George W. Bush!
My advice? Stop reading Time magazine! I stopped reading it in the 1990's when the Clinton's were being made into Gods during the ethnic cleansing campaign(s) by the U.S. military in the Balkans and the blockades to Iraq along with Bill' fighting impeachment for cum stains on a certain "helpers" dress when what the U.S. was doing in Eastern Europe and Iraq should have been the reason for his impeachment!
Just like Nixon. The American people will be told exactly what they want to hear and that's been our biggest problem for 70 years!!!
You assume WAY too much and you come off as hysterical.
I don't read Time magazine, I didn't vote for Obama, I don't have a TV.
sheesh I would vote you down but it's not worth the effort.
lol
"None of us know who Putin really is."
i know something about putin im ready to post here if you want to
It is not coincidence that the worst presidents by anyone's rankings have come in the last few elections. People need to analyse why that is ....
I'm still suspicious of Brandon's Oath Breaker friends.
I mean seriously, how can you be any sort of "Oath Keeper" if your day job is kicking down doors to enforce the War on Drugs or bombing brown people half way across the world for the benefit of the war financiers? Pledging not to confiscate people's guns during the next Katrina or SHTF event is great, but that hardly makes you a gatekeeper of Constitutional liberties.
People want leaders because they have been conditioned from birth to obey authorities. This is not by design, it is a result of the evolution of culture.
You have free people, that do not follow leaders, and tribal people who follow leaders. There are no genetic differences between them but cultural differences, which are passed generation to generation.
If the strategy of following leaders ensures survival chances greater than the strategy of being free, given enough generation the overall global culture will be one of tribalism.
Had "total freedom at any cost" been the best strategy we would have always been free. Of course most americans do not want total freedom at any cost. They like to follow orders, as long as they are lax and increase their survival chances. Nobody wants to follow orders that increase your chance of failure, so they rebel not for freedom but against retard leadership.
Evolution will keep shaping our culture. If social engineers fuck up too much, the culture they design will fail and be replaced by a better one.
I think people follow orders because they are conditioned to fear not following orders. The most successful leaders throughout history have always been the biggest mass-murderers.
Mass murderers just kill off the reasonable people of the world as the Europeans slaughtered their way through America murdering the more spiritually advanced and civilized American Indians.
I also do not believe that people will eventually change their form of government. That is the same fallacy as believing that the truth always comes out. Bad government and lies have been propagated through thousands and thousands of years, just changing their outward appearance, and it is my belief that the two go hand in hand.
I liked a few things in the article, but there is way too much 'credit or blame' assigned to Putin. If the U.S. would have stayed out of Ukraine and Syria we would hardly be talking about Russia.
Typical propaganda bunkum which translates as:
"They are all the same. You're being conned. Don't believe any of it, it's all kabuki anyway. Drop it. Go back to your porn, your TVs, have another McDonalds hamburger, and leave us to us carry on making our millions on your backs while you eat yourselves stupid in front of your reality shows".
Brandon's stance here is extremely risky for whatever credibility he has in the eyes of whoever follows his blog posts because it is highly likely that his thesis here is going to be torn apart in the near future as conflict between the West and East increases.
Maybe he's one of these full-retard conspiracy nuts that would swear the Lizard people are still hiding in the tunnels as nukes are being exchanged between super powers, capital cities are being wiped out, and the vast majority of the "elites" and their families are dead.
As the world inches (actually, it 'leaps' now) towards war, a great and noble 'peacemaker' arises and the phrase 'New World Order' takes on its true meaning.
Distilled down to basics, the Brandon Smith take is that nations are willing to sacrifice their own, all in a giant 'play' to deceive everyone...? Sorta like, Super-Duper double, triple and quadruple crossing everyone and laughing all along the way, secret agent man...?
HILARIOUS! LMAO
MORE LIBERTARIAN PARANOID BULLSHIT! LOL
DA' BIG BAD GUBERMENT IS COMIN' TO GET US! LOL!
LOVE ZERO FOR ITS GEO-POLITICAL COMEDY ROUTINES!
Here's Brandon...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmYy7KPlDdc
Why people put their faith in things blindly is beyond me. If ones faith in government of any flavor has not been shaken yet? Some work on yourself in front of a mirror seems to be in order.
Integrity demands some proof. Thats not really any governments strong suit. Governments strong suit is always force period. Real proof can stand up to any questions. Me I got way too many questions with no good answers.
Using just basic logic its been far to easy for me to poke holes in most every naritive trotted out thruout my lifetime. Very few naritives can stand up to even a handfull of good questions.
Ask the good questions of everybody and listen to the answers. It is only right that everyone should doubt me. Its only fair. The answers must add up.
Its not that everyone lies. We all do its just human nature. The thing is that we fall for these lies way to often. That my friends is on each of us.
"Time Magazine publishes pro-Putin articles naming him “man of the year” in every other nation where they have distribution, but removes these stories and covers when publishing in America."
Because the American public is too dumb to handle complex ideas and only wants it's "news" to agree with previously held opinions....
I hate what the media has become and what it is enabling the US public to become.
I dont agree with the too dumb line. Most have simply been misslead. Secondly things are not as complicated as they are being portrayed. The simple truths are buried under a mountian of BS to confuse people. A little digging and you may find these truths if you are honest with yourself. Thats realy the key. STOP LYING TO YOURSELF! Then you might find the clarity we all seek.
Perhaps I was not being too clear in my post. My point about being too dumb was that was the view of the Media and therefore they give us info that they think that we want to hear (and maybe since they are a business, we motivate them to act that way). Restricting the information does affect how the US thinks as information preceeds knowledge.
To expect people to dig and be honest with themselves and seek knowledge just does not jive with the Kardashian world we live in....
Why not expect those things from everyone? We demand this of our true friends dont we?
I wouldn't say that the puppet master left the building.
https://www.rothschild.com/russia/
Nor, did Putin chase away the Jewish "oligarch."
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/03/11/Oligarchs071103.html
All wars are bankster wars for profit. When the ROI declines, the wars are rolled into bigger wars and poweis consolidated. Maybe not as fast as we would like to think, but when you've been at it for centuries, what's a few more decades. Besides, things in the MENA are going ALL according to the Yinon Plan.
Pretty obvious after reading all the comments, proves beyond a doubt that the prerequisites are too great to see a bigger picture.
Precisely as planned.
Some here do see beyond the veil.
I do find it interesting that those that speak of all power brokers being on the same side...are dog piled pretty quickly. Very telling.
Why we should all be paying attention to Amb. Leo Emil Wanta. He is smarter than Kissinger, Brzezinski, _________, combined. And, much, much wiser ..
He is not a politician. He is an engineer, a law enforcement officer, a master economist, a very, very successful businessman.
He aspires no political career (although he is a master at geopolitics.) So, the next question being, what career politician statesman wishes to join forces with and get behind him?
https://app.box.com/s/hfgvcqg7gqh7i27at6sv53ywu87lwarp (Read Me First)
I didn't realize Russia, China and Putin owed the Patriot movement anything...i mean given how much destruction the West has intentionally caused in those two countries over the last 300+ years i'm shocked they're not actively sabotaging it to give a taste of the same shit we've been shoving down their throats for centuries.
Secondly, like everyone else who passes as an "analyst" in the western world i really enjoy reading the jeuvenile binary logic analysis he has of Putin and Eaterners in genera /sarcl. Because apparently only two idiotic and simplistic solutions and scenarios are possible. For all his travels and claims of "self learning", his inability to truly understand that other cultures and mindsets is mind boggling. I guess i shouldn't be surprised since he's shown no sign of deep layered analysis and his conclusions are the same i would have drawn in grade 8, it's fine in grade 8, but not as an adult with a modicum of intellect and education. For fucks sake, just read "The Prince" by Nicolo Machiavelli and that should tell you something else is afoot. But your "Fox Nexs" intelligence level analysis is simply that...simple.
As for the banks, of course they work with them...they live in the same world and you need to work with them till you can destroy them. China and Russia have been clear that the goal is to move to a gold, silver, oil and commodity based currency in the future. IMF SDR is a stop gap to destroy the dollar and look like nice guys in the process, since they finally realized that perception and optics matter. Russia has jailed and seized assets of plenty of CIA and Rotschild front families....can they do it all in one fell swoop? Probably not.
And ya ya, you "foresaw" Syria and how it will play out...bullshit, everyone was saying that Russia/China are NWO shills and that they'd let Syria and Iran fall but do token effort blah blah....guess thats not working out too well.
Are Russia and China nice players? Of course not, but they sure as shit don't seem as hell bent on destroying their culture and people to the god of globalism like the zionist controlled west. In the end, maybe they could be, but certianly not for the reasons laid out above or because of an accurate analysis of whats going on.
“How do you know that Putin isn’t telling Kissinger, ‘Buddy, your days are numbered.'”
'…I looked up an old New York Times article I ran across a while ago…'
'The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words…'
http://redefininggod.com/the-rockefeller-plan-for-the-brics-new-world-or...
'UN Rolls Out Agenda 2030 "Global(ist) Goals" - #NewWorldNextWeek'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzkSJagx--Y
Ya, because the Mouth piece rag of the NWO/globalists aka the NYT is a bastion of integrity and truth...they'd "never" lie to us....
The entire papers' existence is one big Govt propoganda front....
The BRICS were the brainchild of Goldman Sachs http://redefininggod.com/2015/01/the-brics-were-the-brainchild-of-goldma...
And somehow only jews and the cia have the monopoly on infiltrating and suborning entities to do their will?
I don't know if Russia/China are part of NWO, their actions seem to say they care more about their own countries and leveraging the power of the globalists in their favour....
Apparently no one has heard of playing nice to get what you want until it's time to destroy your enemy....
If the patriot movement and freedom lovers can't leverage even a Faux conflict to bring back freedom and prosperity to the US, then we deserve what we get....Russia and China don't owe us shit
This is an excellent, thought-provoking, article. Many of the commenters fail to grasp the key point: It's not that Brandon Smith is necessarily correct, but that he could be correct. The implications then would be enormous. First, the liberty movement is indeed on its own--we shall have to change the world ourselves, and can't trust anyone to do this for us. Second, the coming East/West war could simply be an orchestrated deep-state maneuver. This interpretation of events is certainly in accordance, as well, with past events, e.g., the UK and the City of London started planning and preparing for World War I--in order to destroy Germany--ten years at least before the outbreak of hostilities.
And here is another indication of the importance of this issue. I was listening recently to a conversation between a China scholar and a guest. They seemed to agree on just about everything except one point: Who controls the Central Banks of China and Russia (and hence who rules China and Russia)? The answer to this question would likewise throw light on the question raised by Brandon Smith:
http://www.cjournal.info/2015/10/08/people-versus-the-banks/
This article contains 80% straight Bull Shit - especially Co joining Russia with the USA.
Quotes like - - and that Putin describes Kissinger as his “trusted foreign policy adviser”
or that Russia TRUSTS Goldman Sucks - - ha ha ha
-- is just so ABSURD that only a Fool would believe it.
Vlad is No fool as he has shown - to think he would trust the scheming ,lying,murderous Kissinger for a nano second makes this article a complete fiction.