What Do You Actually Own as Opposed to HOPE You Own?

The Powers That Be are taking action to prepare for the next crisis.

These actions include:

1)   New rules that allow funds to lock in your money for up to 10 days in the event of a crisis.

2)   FDIC regulations that permit the FDIC to FREEZE bank accounts at major banks when a meltdown hits.

3)   Proposing the banning of physical cash.

All of these boil down to one key phrase: custody risk.

Custody risk is a legal phrase used to convey “what do you really own when you buy an investment.”

In today’s financial world, virtually no one has the actual physical share certificates of the stocks they own or other assets held by their various accounts/ trusts/ etc. Instead, their shares and other assets are electronically “parked” at their brokerage firm or some other financial institution.

Custody risk assesses what happens to those shares or other assets in the event that the brokerage firm goes under due to insolvency, negligence or fraudulent action. It is essentially a legal framework through which you maintain ownership even if the entity holding your shares or assets for you (the custodian) goes out of business.

This is a HUGE issue that is boiling just beneath the surface of the financial system.  The SEC recently performed a study of some 400-investment advisor firms. As the SEC itself stated in its report approximately one-third of them (over 140) failed to meet custody rule requirements.

The issues here are too myriad to list, but some of them include:

1)   A lack of awareness by advisors concerning the custody rule (read: the advisor isn’t even sure of whether he or she has custody of their clients’ accounts)

2)   Failure by the advisor to have the assets or securities placed with a qualified custodian firm (a qualified financial firm)

3)   Failure by the advisor to have an independent accountant audit the firm’s holdings (so who is keeping track of what your assets are actually worth or where they are for that matter)?

4)   Failure to provide GAAP approved audits of client accounts (read: the balance sheets of the clients funds they provided did not meet Generally Accepted Auditing Standards or GAAP).

My point with all of this is that most investment professionals don’t even consider these issues. Again roughly ONE THIRD of the advisory firms the SEC examined failed to meet custody rule requirements.

In simple terms: these folks were not keeping track of where the assets were, weren’t providing their clients with timely updates of where the assets where, failed to pass special exams concerning issues of custody rule AND failed to have independent audits of their clients’ funds performed.

In other words… they didn’t really know where their clients funds were, how big or how small they were… in fact, many of them didn’t even realize that they themselves were legal custodians of their clients’ funds.

Custody risk goes beyond investment advisors. Indeed, these issues are endemic to the financial system today.

Let’s say the financial firm which is actually keeping custody of your assets (your stock shares, money market account, etc.) goes belly-up. What happens then? How quickly can you access your accounts? How soon can they be transferred out of the firm to another custodian?

You see where I’m going with this.

Even if an appropriate legal framework is in place to eliminate the risk of loss of value of the securities held by the custodian in the event of its failure, it can take weeks or even months to transfer the securities to a new custodian. During that time, you cannot close out open positions… they are effectively frozen.

In the case of MF Global, some investors were locked out of their accounts and couldn’t trade their positions for weeks. As a result many of them incurred massive losses (imagine owning stocks and not being able to sell them during a crash).

I bring all of this is up because custody risk is one of the biggest, most important issues to consider if you want to maintain your wealth when the next round of systemic risk hits. Remember from the case of Cyprus… once things get bad, they do so in a hurry.

Indeed, we know that custody risk is a major concern for the Big Banks because they are pushing to outlaw physical cash.

Why?

Because when you demand your cash from a bank, you are demanding that they relinquish custody. This means they have to come up with the actual money as opposed to digital currency that floats around the financial system.

This is just the beginning. Indeed… we've uncovered a secret document outlining how the US Federal Reserve plans to incinerate savings.

We detail this paper and outline three investment strategies you can implement

right now to protect your capital from the Fed's sinister plan in our Special Report

Survive the Fed's War on Cash.

We are making 1,000 copies available for FREE the general public.

To pick up yours, swing by….

http://www.phoenixcapitalmarketing.com/cash.html

Best Regards

Graham Summers

Chief Market Strategist

Phoenix Capital Research

 Our FREE daily e-letter: http://gainspainscapital.com/

Comments

[Dr_Snooz]

We should note that most of these small "boutique" guys farm out their custody obligations to big banks or other big custodial firms. So the problem of occulted ownership originates higher up. MF Global was proof that this problem is pervasive in the financial industry, as was Madoff. The sad reality is that an occulted claim to assets held is the very quintessence of fractional reserve banking.

In the words of George Bailey, "I don't have your money. It's in Tom's house... "

[TimmyM]

Might be nice if he linked the SEC study.

[the grateful un...]

this is where the online brokers are probably going to present the biggest problems because they play fast and loose with these rules. if you want to short something right away the online site is the place to go, when i go to the broker for a short it sometimes takes days. the broker presents problems because they (used to) pool assets, which is to say if the broker has a meltdown the MM account holder gets in line with stock holders and option holders for payment. if you're fucking around in the stock market you better have a condom. i confine most of my investments through a broker to government bonds which are registered and held at treasury. if you're buying stocks they remain in a holding company and good luck with that.

[GRDguy]

That's exactly why I left the financial seas 11 years ago.  No dealings nor payments of any kind to the financial community.

That's why they manipulate the price of gold and silver. To survive, they must discourage you from owning it.  They'll go broke if you (have it in your hands and) own it.  They can't slice and dice their income off your income and/or savings, nor steal it directly by pretending they're holding it for you.  Remember, Corzine and Madoff sent monthly statements, too.