This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Iraq To Washington: "We Don't Need Your Help Fighting Terrorism"
Perhaps the most astounding thing about recent events in the Mid-East is the extent to which outcomes that seem far-fetched one week become reality the next.
This dynamic began back in June when Iran’s most powerful general vowed to “surprise the world” with his next move in Syria. Just weeks later, he was in Moscow (in violation of a UN travel ban) hatching a plan with Putin to launch an all-out invasion on behalf of Assad on the way to forcibly enacting a dramatic shift in the Mid-East balance of power. Before the West had a chance to react, Moscow was establishing an air base at Latakia.
As all of this unfolded we began to suggest that it would be only a matter of time before Russian airstrikes began in Iraq.
The setup, we contended, was just too perfect. Iran controls both the military and politics in the country and so, we speculated that The Kremlin would get a warm welcome if Putin decided to launch an air campaign against ISIS targets across Syria’s eastern border.
Sure enough, Baghdad moved to establish an intelligence cell with Russia, Syria, and Iran in September and when PM Haider al-Abadi said he would welcome Russian airstrikes, it was clear that the US was about to be booted out of the country it “liberated” more than a decade ago.
Subsequently, Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joe Dunford traveled to Baghdad and gave Abadi an ultimatum: "...it’s either us or the Russians."
Well, despite Dunford’s contention that Abadi promised not to enlist Moscow’s help, just days later Iraq gave Moscow the green light to strike ISIS convoys fleeing Syria.
A desperate Washington then attempted to prove that the US could still be effective at fighting terrorism by sending 30 Delta Force soldiers into battle with the Peshmerga on a prison raid mission in the Northern Iraqi town of Huwija. Conveniently, one American soldier apparently had a GoPro strapped to his helmet and the footage was almost immediately leaked to Western media.
Our contention (and again, this is in no way an attempt to trivialize the death of Master Sgt. Joshua L. Wheeler, the first US soldier to die in Iraq since 2011): Washington sent 30 Delta Force spec ops soldiers into a fight the Pentagon knew they would win and then filmed it to prove to Baghdad and any other interested Mid-East governments that the US can fight terrorism just as effectively as the Russians. The video was then used as a pretext for Ash Carter to tell the Senate that the US is now prepared to engage directly on the ground in Iraq and Syria. The US media then proceeded to document a “new” strategy whereby at the very least, Washington is set to send Apache gunships to Iraq to assist Iraqi, Kurdish, and Iran-backed militias in the fight against ISIS.
There are several absurd things about this strategy and we encourage you to read our assessment from Wednesday, but the point here is this: it turns out that after 13 months of ineffective airstrikes and what amounts to nearly 13 years of occupation, Iraq doesn’t want any help from the US.
Here's NBC (because nothing says "humiliation" like the US media reporting that Baghdad has essentially told Washington "don't call us, we'll call you"):
The Iraqi government said Wednesday it didn't ask for — and doesn't need — the "direct action on the ground" promised by the Pentagon.
The revelation came a day after Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said the U.S. may carry out more unilateral ground raids — like last week's rescue operation to free hostages — in Iraq to target ISIS militants.
Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi's spokesman told NBC News that any military involvement in the country must be cleared through the Iraqi government just as U.S.-led airstrikes are.
"This is an Iraqi affair and the government did not ask the U.S. Department of Defense to be involved in direct operations," spokesman Sa'ad al-Hadithi told NBC News. "We have enough soldiers on the ground."
Yes, "enough soldiers on the ground." And as we never tire of pointing out, most of those soldiers are either Iranian or Iran-backed, and now that Moscow and Tehran have established a Mid-East military alliance, Iraq no longer has any use for Washington.
So it would appear that one video of a prison raid is far too little, far too late to convince Baghdad not to lean Russian when it comes to routing ISIS. And indeed, there's almost no question that Tehran is feeding Iraqi politicians intelligence that - right or wrong - suggests the US tacitly supports Islamic State in an effort to ensure that the group can continue to serve as a destabilizing force vis-a-vis regimes that are deemed unfriendly to Washington's regional allies. Indeed, one has to wonder whether it's a coincidence that the two countries where ISIS has established itself just happen to be the two countries wherein Iranian influence is the most pronounced.
In any event, Iraq has just told Washington "thanks, but no thanks" just days after giving Moscow the go ahead to conduct bombing runs on ISIS.
The writing is on the wall. The US is being booted out of the Mid-East.
»
- 25317 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
more cowbell..
... well that didnt work...Top US general Martin Dempsey says Iranian hand in Iraq could turn out wellNo matter what ultimately happens in Syria and Iraq, the Kurds will be fucked over in all three countries – Turkey, Iraq and Syria. No matter how bravely they fight against ISIS today, once the “terriss” are destroyed and/or pushed into Saudi Arabia, the Kurds will be pushed back into the mountains in all three countries and kept separate from each other.
They are the most deserving bunch of people to have their own country, but, unfortunately, they never will.
Looney
Baghdad doesn't need the U.S. because they've sensed the wind shift and they're probably allying themselves with Iran and Russia as we speak.
Yes, we toppled Saddam, but nothing we've done since then has made the average Iraqi, Sunni or Shiite, appreciate us much.
Stoopid arrogant elites, always presuming they can meddle and get away with it. I'd love the U.S. to go back to just protecting itself for the rest of my life.
In the UK there is a public enquiry called the Chilcot Enquiry into the Iraq war which has been running for 6-7 years now and will be published next year.
http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/
The British enquiry has legal access to all British documents (including confidential and secret) and all British citizens, importantly this includes secret correspondance between Blair and Bush. Blair had to testify and answer questions about private discussions between himself and Bush in the run up to the Iraq invasion. This testimony potentially incriminates Bush.
It seems Tony Blair and GW Bush are going to get tarred and feathered as war criminals by the enquiry and the reason it has taken almost 7 years to publish is because of something called "Maxwellisation" where people accused of crimes have a chance to answer the accusations in writing to be included in the appendix.
Blair might face criminal charges and could be summoned to the Hague, although I doubt Bush will face anything as a former POTUS.
Check it out, it's going to be a big topical issue during June/July in the 2016 election cycle.
"Iraq" and "Iraqi" should always have been put in scare quotes, now more obviously so than ever.
I don't agree. With the Russians backing the Shia, I think the Kurds will be given a green light to fight for their own country. Why? Because they already control their own regions of Syria and Iraq. They already keep their own oil money from this region. And if they are given a green light to try to conquor the last region, who are they fighting? That's right -- Turkey. Who has been supporting those trying to infiltrate and create chaos in Syria and Iraq, who wants Assad out so they can have their pipeline. And, Turkey is NATO. Which means the Russians get to poke the NATO bear without suffering any casualties because it is being done by their proxies.
Just like we did to them in Afghanistan. What comes around goes around. The Peshmergas are the Russian's Mujahideen.
"They are the most deserving bunch of people to have their own country, but, unfortunately, they never will."
I would agree with you if it wasn't for their active participation in the Armenian, Pontian Greek and Assyrian genocides of the Turks. Back then, the Kurds were on the side of the mass murderers, killing and maiming with the best of them.
At least, as opposed to the Turkish regime, they have since apologized about the Armenian genocide. As for the Pontian Greeks and the Assyrians, we're waiting.
So, "deserving"? More than Erdogan, that's for sure.
Yet...
The kurds are an ancient people whose homeland is the zagros mountains, but they have never formed a state in the modern sense. It can be argued that they are the original terrorists as the history books tell us that they were infamous for banditry, mercenary fighting and terror attacks by the hashisheems (assassins).
They dream of Saladin and think they will get their own state. Naybe so, but it will be ruled by a US puppet and will be used to attack Iran through it's kurdish north. Part of the US strategy is destabilisation of Armenia /Azerbaijan and the kurds are a convenient bridge across the region.
So, this means that this can't be labeled as being an "You're doing a heck of a job, Brownie" announcement?
So they figured out who the real terrorists are?
Indeed! Obama and company are the state sponsors of terrorism. I am ashamed of this country that was once America. I now hold no ownership in Amerika and will not be owned by it either.
Ditto.
They've really fucked the place up.
Omerika
Pretty bold statements to make when Russia is your new BFF.
why would they make them without a new best friend? russia plus iran probably looks better to a lot of the muslim world than the u.s. and israel (with or without saudi arabia, etc.).
Any muslim not of the Saudi bent would look at Russia as a benevolent sponsor. Sure they decimated Chechnya, but look at it now. Grosny rivals Mecca in Islamic splendour. If you're Shia, Alawite, Kurd, Turk or (legitimately, not US sponsored) moderate Sunni you'd be begging Moscow to step in and save you from the Saudi Wahabbists.
Our Israeli-Neocon strategy has fubared the entire ME and a lot of Eastern Europe.
Osama Bin Ladin's strategy is working fine, the US is indeed going broke and will soon have to stop its military operations, including support for all of our client states. Also Israel.
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/10/27/ignoring-the-absolutely-in...
No rational country would accept US help at this point.
Oswald bin Laden also said he was not involved in 911 Psyop has been deciphered. Murdered investigators and evidence behind massive financial fraud in the highest places.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982_Lebanon_War
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsiVwgzcfHw
Israel-Lebanon 1982
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32_uWMBmphM 6 US Marines killed
"Bin Laden claimed he was inspired to destroy the World Trade Center after watching the destruction of towers in Lebanon by Israel during the 1982 Lebanon War.[16]
Bin Laden was a CIA asset to his dying day.
I shudder to think what the White House conceded to in order to get the CIA to agree to his death in Pakistan, all for a little PR.
There is more evidence OBL died before govt claims he did in 2011.
https://www.corbettreport.com/osama-bin-laden-pronounced-dead-for-the-ni...
It's pretty obvious what's going on, the US isn't fighting ISIS, but is supporting them.
Act of War: U.S. airstrikes kill 22 Iraqi troops in ar-Ramadi [al-Anbar]
Oct 28
"(FNA) ~ Iraqi security sources disclosed that the US-led coalition’s airstrikes have once again killed 22 army and volunteer forces on Tuesday. The US-led anti-ISIL coalition targeted the Iraqi forces’ positions instead of ISIL terrorists in the Western parts of Iraq."
Over one year ago I watched for the comabt videos- like we had from Iraq1 and Afghanistan. There were NONE with us killing ISIS devils. NONE! I knew in the first months that we were playing a game. All our targets were Assad refineries and warehouses.
Sure enough, we were equipping the terrorists along with Israel and Turkey... the target was Syria to make way for a Saudi pipeline.
Bingo! There were no Pentagon updates on air strikes. No videos of smart bombs. In fact, ISIS convoys owned the roads of Syria and Iraq in broad daylight for that entire year! Hundreds of vehicles of ISIS lined the roads in daylight, rolling into cities and attacking, The US air campaign did nothing. In fact. In soutern Syria, a group of long empty villages, have been photographed by Russian drones. In this small area of empty villages, there appears to be a mass of bomb craters, with no design or reason to them, just like someone has been dumping bombs there for a year! Russia announced the discovery of this oddly heavily bombed empty space last week in Russian news sources.
Well, we had to drop all of the old bombs somewhere, so then we would have to buy new bombs.
Orders are orders.
Links, please, I gotta see this!
"the target was Syria to make way for a Saudi pipeline"
The target is to get rid of the "threats" to Israel and it's aims to grab more land and resources.
https://www.rt.com/business/317906-oil-golan-heights-israel/
But, you're on the right track in realizing that wars are about resources (as they ALWAYS are- follow the "money!").
No argument here. I see this as the triumvirate of goals. Turkey wanted to whack the Kurds and Assad. Israel wanted to whack Assad. Obama is beholden to his masters the Sauds. And all of them are under the direction of the "controllers" who are setting the stage for WW3.
if the saudis are obama's masters why does he have so many zionist jews in his administration (and almost no arabs)?
there are some who believe the house of Saud are actually crypto-jews
You've got it all wrong. Washington, Riyadh, and Tel Aviv all have the same master: London.
The House of Saud and Zionist Israel were both installed by London for the purpose of controlling the Middle East. London just uses the USA as their bully boy, keeping everyone else in line. But London has no love for the former colony that dared to oppose her. She spent a century and a half infiltrating the US at every level and then another century slowly gutting her from the inside. Now all that's left of interest is her ability to start wars and be the focus of retaliation.
London's vengeance against the US has been a long time in the making, and will be all the more sweet for it.
Appearances. Israel and KSA are tight allies against the Shia, along with Sunni Turkey. Behind the scenes things are different. Do a FOIA for the WH log book and count the number of times someone with an Arabic name checked in to see the Prezy.
Still, KSA is not the master. They are a oil rich pawn who have their prices for cooperation. The whole story begins and ends with one name. Rothschild.
But who will help the Kurds? (Was I able to say it before McCain and Graham?)
Hitchens! Oh, wait...
i just don't know what the fuck is going on
Nor does Washington
Would you rather have a PC transgender army or Shia militia save your ass in a gunfight. I would go for the militia.
Al Abadi is out in a year or less if he sticks with the Yanks...who will leave him high and dry like they do all of their "friends"
i am not as sure as you. transgender people serve in the u.s. armed forces at twice the rate of the rest of the population. female at birth three times.
especially if it's a gunfight i'm not sure.
a fist fight maybe the militia because of the upper body strength.
but a gunfight, go with the best shooters. if i was female at birth and in the army, i would definitely try to be a marks, ah, person.
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/category/research/military-related/
They don't understand that we would be bombing them for their own good. Send horseface with a big bribe, so we can pay them to blow US tax dollars to let us kill them.
Signed,
MIC-key
M-I-C See ya real soon!
K-E-Y Why? Because we like you!
Too many boots, not enough ground
Oh and since it's been a while.....let me just add
USA OUT OF EURASIA
"USA OUT OF EURASIA"
That is really what it is about.
The Hokey Pokey is what it's all about. Just imagine the ME as some dude getting bent over.
"You put your right foot in, you pull your right foot out..."
What? The Memo headline we'd like to help kill another Million Iraqis didn't win them over..
They just aren't FREE enough.
Yaaa, Iraq can handle ISIS so well that they have delayed the Mosul assault how many times over how many months?
They are simply waiting for someone else to do their heavy lifting for them. Keep waiting.
"Use the phone. Call in a drone."
Hey, it's their country. They can handle it any way they want. Can hardly blame them.
if you had the prospect of the russian air force actually attacking isis, instead of dumping bombs in empty areas, wouldn't you delay the attack?
perhaps not as you are MadVladtheconquerer
Thats good get the hell out of the middle hell and lets get our country fixed. We cant liberate ourselves. Go USSA
I don't call the Arsonist who put my home on fire to put out the fire.
Especially when he's already "booked" setting your car on fire!
Might they have figured out that Obamas American foreign policy is really not on their side.
Sorry, pal, but "Obamas" [sic] policy doesn't exist. This is a carry-on from PNAC (which was only built upon previous aims at controlling the ME and Russia [see "The Grand Chessboard"]), or, perhaps rewind to the 50s when the CIA ousted Mosaddegh.
true enough that it's a carry-forward from pnac but i think after seven years obama's (sick) policy can be an appropriate usage. after all he started the wars in libya and syria; that shows initiative.
Awesome. Time for Amerika to loose interest and go blow up some other part of the world.
Like, say, the South China Sea?
And, literally!
Iraq is about to get the ATF treatment...we're coming in bitchez
What does Bush, Rumsfeld, and Cheney say to the thousands of US soldiers who are horribly burnt, crippled, practically brain dead, etc.?
Collateral damage.
We can borrow against it.
"We think the price is worth it". Madeline Albright... By the way, illegal war. How about that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8
I'm pretty sure it would be: "Suckas!"
Don't forget that filthy lying cunt Colin Powell.
about what they say to those incinerated in the wtc and, what do you think, gassed? on those airplanes (if they ever really existed).
perhaps mrs. ted olsen just wanted a second life in israel and saw a chance to do it. throw in some plastic surgery and a little of the "lost" pentagon trillions announced on 9-10-01 and voila!
they must laugh until they puke when they talk of the poor fools that followed down the roads they pointed out.
Translation: FUCK OFF !
Music to my ears. Fuck you ragheads.
What is going to happen to the big new embassy complex that the US built in Iraq?
More importantly, what happens when Iraq, Iran, and Syrian oil start hitting the market?
And it's sold for anything but US$.
It'll probably get attacked giving D.C. just the excuse they need to insert ground troops.
It'll have to be something spectacular, probably when al-Abadi is visiting.
If anyone thinks Washington is going to step back, then keep drinking the kool-aid.
well, there is this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AiyFF9qOls
Don't worry, NAR' will be able to properly establish it's value! It's ALL hot real estate!
The show raid in northern Iraq was done without asking or telling Baghdad.
The US does as it pleases, foments coups, bombs hospitals, and provides perpetual diplomatic cover for *unequivocal* Israeli warcrimes.
The US is absolutely lawless, it has made the UN useless, and it it is not acting out of the best interests of the American people - but acting in the interests of banks/wall street, the MIC/war profiteers, and Ersatz Israel.
It's not even about securing energy - the idea the US can "secure" Iraqi oil is nonsense, the oil companies did not lobby for the Iraq war [indeed it cost them money] -the Ziocons did.
I tended to figure that the 'strategy" was to withhold the oil off the market, assuming that it would get "tapped" when the Saudi's empire collapsed (when the oil flows dropped off).
For sure, though, the Israelis have their interests in all of this!
i am liking the ersatz israel.
true enough on a number of levels:
ersatz democracy; ersatz rule of law; ersatz u.s. ally; ersatz non-nuclear power; . . . .
USSA - Persona Non Grata
Gee! I wonder why???
American exceptionalism, y'all don't come back now, ya'hear.
The US wants to play the human shield game and place soldiers around anyone/anything that Russia wants to blow up.
Iraq demographics- 60% Shiite, 20% Sunni, 20% Kurd. Obviously, once a new (at least) partially democratic government was set up in Iraq, it is logical to assume that it would be dominated by the majority Shiites. Since Iran is also Shiite, one would further assume that Iran and Iraq would form closer ties. What did Bush II/Tony Blair and their neocon buddies, who “planned” the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq, think would happen following Saddam Hussein’s removal from power? More than anything else, the US invasion of Iraq served to greatly increase Iranian power and influence in the region. It is dangerous to base foreign policy on greed, arrogance and dishonesty.
What part of the 100 year War on Terror don't you comprehend?
i think he makes a good point. what indeed did wolfowitz, feith, perle, cheney, rumsfeld . . . think would be the long term advantage for israel? i guess they must have thought an invasion of iran was also in the cards and if every single muslim country in the area (except ksa, etc.) was torn into a failed state and its population decimated and left homeless, israel would be more secure.
ashcanazi thinking.
Political rhetoric so overwhelms every government agency preventing anything like an objective analysis of the middle east. Forget the useless simple minded sniping between Republicrats.
The reality is that anyone who had a clue would have realized that Saddam Hussein represented a repressive minority government comprised of Sunni's. The vast majority of the Iraqi population are Shia. Iran is almost entirely Shia. Religous affiliation in the middle east extends to social custom and many other things less prevalent in the west. In essense it means a lot.
There was NEVER any doubt that when Hussein's Sunni minority faction was pushed, across the board, from power that anything like a democratic electoral process would empower the Shia majority. And the Shia majority would decide to get even with their former oppressors and align themselves with the people they were already closest too, Iran.
No one who has travelled in the middle east or familiar with the area (I am) ever expected ANY other outcome.
When it comes to understanding the world and enforcing our will its not that we lack military muscle or the will to exercise raw power. We are simply stupid, clueless, giants wandering around believing what we say things are like instead of studying how things really are.
Bush and his neocon advisers were a joke. Obama doesn't stand any chance of doing better and is repeatedly embarrased by such as having to abandon the pretext that we favor the democratic process in the region by backing the military junta that overthrew the elected government of Eqypt (Morsi).
Elect any of the Republican candidates and they will just do the Bush all over again. They know nothing. Elect Hillary Clinton and the same dance with a slightly different tune will play out. She's cynical enough and realistic enough to have a better view than the neocon fanatasy of the world. But she can make no better outcome in an area where it turns out America can't dictate.
But! You assume that the objective is not that of wanting CHAOS to prevail. (might try looking up some public statements by Wolfowitz)
The Iran/Iraq war had the US essentially backing both in the hopes that they'd wipe each other out.
If you look at all the high-level US strategic documents you'll see it quite clearly, the desire is to NOT allow anyone to form any power that could stand up to/against the US. The chaos approach pretty much assures that.
As I stated elsewhere, Iraq's oil (and Iran's, which would pretty much sew it all up) was about a hedge for when the Saudi empire fell. The statement made by Rumsfeld et al about Iraqi oil paying for all the invasion activities was right if you put it into the context of having this captured as a future reserve to draw upon when the Saudi empire collapses (or their oil production otherwise drops off a cliff).
ALL conflicts/wars are about resources (if you can manage to peel through the layers of shit).
The upper-hand that the Russians are now tending to display will result in the US resorting to what it did in the past- take a bit more of a retreat position as pertains to the front-page and work on the continued destabilization angle (that's how it's been pushing). The Russians will find, just as the US has, that the easy part is in achieving military victories; the hard part is then holding on toe those victories. Russia really doesn't want to help oil flows either as that would undercut their own oil production/sales; this might turn out to be a problem for them (unless they too are going to go for their own version of maintaining controlled chaos).
"ALL conflicts/wars are about resources"
Not quibbling, but there are leadership fortunes to be made in political, military and social circles. The leaders in those arenas of the victors have much to win, and not just economically. I work in Silicon Valley, and every company that I've seen crap out did so due to the EGO of someone.
i'm not sure what resources made ww1 worth fighting.
lots of dead and the germans didn't pay in real money.
How long do the US military folks need to grasp the fact that the coordination center of Russian, Syrian and Iraqi forces is located in Bagdad.. by no accident, jeez.
It's been decided about the war against UISIS right at the beginning of the russian air campaign. Is all the staff of Pentagon on drugs?
They were too busy get transgendered by the Obama administration to pay attention.
i've got to chuckle at all the attention this is getting here these days.
bradley/chelsea manning is my personal favorite; sweden ought to transfer obama's prize to her.
The US reminds me of the drunk at the dance who is going to have his with that girl or else. She just doesn't know how much she needs him, he mumbles to himself, as he stumbles over chairs on his way to her table.
funny how the US is not flying over Syria anymore; last time they were there they blew up millions of dollars worth of power station ... doubt if the Syrians/Russians will let them back to do more of that ... and I wonder when's "payback time" ...
Ask the "Indigenous People" of America (is that PC enough for you) what the US Govt's assurances mean. NADA!
Gee, they're making out ok now that they've got the right formula:
1) Open casino
2) Keep the drinks coming, until trailer trash loses everything.
3) See that same suckuh next week.
I.e. keep giving firewater until you have everything suckuh owns.
wonder where they learned that?
Now that the one trick pony is backing up, expect it to next destabilize ... who?
Leveraged financialization won't help either. Expect a hasty stage right exit and
change of personnel. However this unfolds, the usual suspects will soon be gone.
All those distasteful things on the neocon agenda will now vanish. in their place
citizen participation, criminal prosecution, and 40 year old forgotten terms from
the JFK era become useful. Whoopee we're al gonna die - but not today!
But ... Rumsfeld promised that we would be greeted as liberators.
He promised.
By Iraqis. He never said WHICH Iraqis!
Need to create a no-fly zone and a no-boating zone on a remote island somewhere, somewhere where its waters are shark-infested, and drop Rumsfeld and all the cast of pieces-of-shit on it. We could have CCTV all over the place so we could watch them suffer until the end of their days; we might even be able to pay off the national debt if we charge for viewing! Other countries' pieces-of-shit could also be added, though we'd want to take a bit of the cut from them for trade-marking this...
this sounds suspiciously like the rule of man not the rule of law, the error that they made.
better a trial for murder and treason (9-11) with some, not much, leniency shown for full confessions.
Iraqis now firmly in the Iranian camp thanks to 2003 US invasion and, later, clueless activities in Syria.
"Mission Accomplished" that "Paid for Itself?"
What a bunch of worse than useless clowns we have running our foreign policy.
Iraqis have been saying that all along that they did not want Washington intervention but were ignored by the Washington Empire. Now maybe Washington will listen, but I doubt it.
Speaking truth to power? Fucking power KNOWS the truth! And it could give a shit how much you "speak."
The USSA military and government should be booted out of everywhere... including the USSA. Too bad the sheeple in the USSA aren't up to the task.
Patience! We're working on it. The plan is to become broke and old, and therefore unable to fund the evil and to be cannon fodder for it.
i'm doing my part.
Sure, this puts the USA in a tight spot. But, don't give up on the Empire. It will strike back! Like that douche Vladtheinhaler -or whatever its name is- said, it will give MANPADS to its' proxy terrorists to shoot down Russian planes. Then to increase the approval of a big war it will obtain public support of mega boots on the ground through False Flag operations both in Europe and America.
This is not over. The real shooting war has not even started.
3-2-1 and Ash Carter goes on national television to provide "indisputable" evidence that the Iraqi government has WMD's and intends to use them leading to the only possible conclusion: The US must now lead a full scale invasion of Iraq to eliminate this threat.
Oh, wait! Will it work again? Just interrupt Americans in the latest episode of American Idol a few times with this drivel and they will be begging for D.C. to send off the troops just to get Ash off of their boob tubes.
Wrap it up in a flag and it'll sell.
Unfortunately, the US govt getting its house in order means e-dissidents get relocated to FEMA camps.
After seeing the job the Obamunist is doing against ISIS, no thanks.
Nothing will be accomplished anywhere by the US either financially or militarily until some form of justice is carried out against our many war criminals both in and out of office. Not only does the world hate us for these crimes but down deep we ourselves feel guilt for living in the same Country as the criminals. We can start with the Bush syndicate of world class criminals and go right down the line to Wall Street and the crimes against humanity in Syria, Libya and yes, Iraq. Right now we are stalled out and sinking in the mud. Only Justice will pull us out.
<-- Satan America
-------------------------
BootDaNiggaObamma
Get out & eat the dust