This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Things You'll Never See
»
- 16221 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
;-)
Things You'll Never See – You’ll never see my goat fucking a frog.
He is not neutered, by the way. He is just a chauvinistic bigot. ;-)
Looney
or the dachshund who nailed a st bernard; someone put him up to it
The actual paper birth certificate for Soetorobama.
No one likes the Frogs.
Tyler, didn't realize you were a global warming denier. Think it's all a hoax? Hit me up and let me tell you about this thing humans discovered called Science.
Or is it just this idiot cartoonist? It was a long way to go for an unfunny punch line. I'm disappointed at the lack of editorial scrutany of the cartoons that get posted here. The articles are great, but you pick such bad comics :/
It's a scientific fact that much of the climate data has been fudged. There's your science.
I will worry about global warming/climate change when I see Al Gore living in a cardboard box walking to the grocery store. Until then, no.
That is an lol troll. Almost MDB-esque.
But anyway, I came here to poop this: not that I don't think the Saudi's are pieces of shit, but why the double standard with regards to keeping the culture pure? Europeans want immigrants to assimilate to European customs and mores. Why is Saudi Arabia criticized for wanting to keep their culture rooted in their insane Wahhabist cult?
Just asking...
I am Chumbawamba.
No Christian migrants in the Middle East? Huh? So what was all that shock and awe about? Lotta Christian migrants went to Iraq and Afghanistan eh? Admittedly only a few Christian Migrants in Syria now (about 50 Special Migrants we hear).
A Shitload of Christian Migrants in Dubai, Qatar, et. al. yeah?
And don't forget, Christian's tried to migrate to Saudi Arabia but someone blew up the barracks. Same when they tried to migrate to Lebannon back in say '83 or so.
Yeah, but I see your point. The Middle East folks are a bit inhospitable.
Anyway the sand in the hourglass has almost reached empty for all of this, so let's entertain ourselves with cartoons and whining if it helps us get through the day.
More idiotic right wing climate denial....
"I won't let the AGW take away my freedumbs!"
A few things we will never see that the Tyler's missed:
proof of man-made climate change
a balanced budget
audit of the Fed
audit of US gold holdings
return of constitutional freedoms
revoking the 2nd amendment without a revolution
the current monetary system lasting until 2020
politicians / bankers ever being held accountable for their actions
Tyler, didn't realize you were a global warming denier.
So is Putin....and he's kickin ISIS ass.
When you say a denier.....It's no longer science.....it's your religion.
Regardless of deniers, religion, and science, I am curious if any one of the adamant NO global warming individuals have worked in weather?
As a person who has worked the Bering Sea, Gulf of Maine, and other exterior weather exposure extremes with daily records and fully cognitive brain... I sure as fuuk see warming and sea shore damage reducing islands and friends; "traditional" 20th century catches not returning due to deep water warmth. Never mind first person, photos, and daily records.
Of course there is NO warming. I do not give a damn what media point is being purveyed by antiwarmers or prowarmers. Where I have been and where I am, still on the face of the weather, the OCEANS, there is a massive difference since 1990. In my records, memory, and visual comparison.
Toss in gardening records I keep from the beginning, insects are not declaring any difficulty with the temperature, nor are the mini mammals or massive increase in owl population locally. Surely these records and memory are not valid, I am not a programmed human. Therefore I know nothing.
If the govts are utilizing a potential problem for their gain who is wrong. People who resist probability with deniability, due to chagrinned triggered minds are only at war within themselves.
Exactly the target of design, divide and conquer.
Who gives a damn what the results of MASSIVE global pollution and ecosystem destruction are. Clean the shit up now, or pass it on like Boomers to the next 10 generations, thanks you blame projectors.
Here it comes. "But, but, but, but, but, but"
The disease called Exceptions.
By all means, personally taste every Fukushima shrimp and see if the flavor is better with the CS-137. For fuck sake, if you want to throw a fit about man's needless pollution of the environment, do it in a place that is critical and obvious. Talking about man's carbon release leading to warming is like eating someone else's creampie . . . it might be tasty, but it's an extraneous action that followed something important.
A boring nothing you said.
AKA "But, but, but, but, but,"
I do not consume anything from North American west, Pacific, or Asia.
Only Organic as well.
I graciously suggest you due similarly.
Skip the shrimp, unless from Maine.
Oh wait, no longer are we allowed to harvest Maine shrimp.
...and by your undetermined standards I should not write here, or here, and
maybe right here... right?
You seem to be confusing three seperate issues:
1: Is the earth warming
2:Is the warming due to man related carbon emissions
3: Is there other visible man made polution
Your personal observations seem to indicate the sea is warming. How do you relate this through personal experience to man made carbon emissions? Sun cycles and natural volcanic emissions have long been correlated with climate and weather changes. Climate has been changing for millions of years long before the recent 200 years of industrialization.
I don't think anyone argues with you on general chemical, radiation, waste, and drug pollution due to man. But this is seperate from any general changes in climate. Sure it makes sense to clean up obvious pollution. But the government has not been effective in most cases (checkout Tar River and Animas River). What evidence do you have that indicates government is the solution?
There is far too much money and power in play in global warming due to man made carbon emissions as currently defined by the interested parties. I have read extensive scientific articles on both sides - and studies that most of the conclusions are not reproducable. There are no more disinterested authorities any more.
The economic stakes are too high to make civilization changing laws on the current information. The real issue is the poor expectation value of the very expensive and curturally disruptive solutions being proposed - and the extraordinary profits that would accrue to some of the proponents. Will the US submit to national industrial changes and penalty payments forced by the proposed UN court as brought by other countries?
I don't think you have thought this through. Give a blank check to someone to do something with no performance metrics nor rewards/penalties?
ALL about MONEY.
SAD.
It's sad that we won't give you all our money? Maybe for you.
I initially believed Al Gore. I even voted for the fucker. Then I started doing some heavy reading. The more I read, the less I believed anybody who tried to induce panic.
Yes, warming seems to be happening. Yes, there is pollution that needs to be cleaned up, particularly in China. ALSO...yes, climate change is a steady, cyclical process. Yes, the most extreme warmings and coolings happened in the past and will happen again.
The only question is, are the things that humans are doing impacting those changes more than, say, volcanic activity or the sun's cycles? I have seen zero evidence that makes me conclude that humans have had more than a very minor overall effect on general climate conditions.
When your heavy hitters (Mann, et al) feel the need to "hide the decline" and openly discuss how they want to manage public perceptions, I'm sorry but that just ain't science. At least not as I've ever known it.
I'm going back to sleep now. I'll believe it's a crisis when people who are demanding that we treat it as a crisis start to act like it's a crisis. Wake me when Al Gore's personal carbon footprint falls below that of Estonia.
Correct on both counts. For me it all changed about 1990.
Can you spell CORRUPTION?
VinceFostersGhost says Putin is an AGW denier:
"Ladies and gentlemen, one more issue that shall affect the future of the entire humankind is climate change. It is in our interest to ensure that the coming UN Climate Change Conference that will take place in Paris in December this year should deliver some feasible results. As part of our national contribution, we plan to limit greenhouse gas emissions to 70–75 percent of the 1990 levels by the year 2030.
However, I suggest that we take a broader look at the issue. Admittedly, we may be able to defuse it for a while by introducing emission quotas and using other tactical measures, but we certainly will not solve it for good that way. What we need is an essentially different approach, one that would involve introducing new, groundbreaking, nature-like technologies that would not damage the environment, but rather work in harmony with it, enabling us to restore the balance between the biosphere and technology upset by human activities.
It is indeed a challenge of global proportions. And I am confident that humanity does have the necessary intellectual capacity to respond to it. We need to join our efforts, primarily engaging countries that possess strong research and development capabilities, and have made significant advances in fundamental research. We propose convening a special forum under the auspices of the UN to comprehensively address issues related to the depletion of natural resources, habitat destruction, and climate change. Russia is willing to co-sponsor such a forum."
-President Putin 28SEP15 @UNGA
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50385
I think you, and others, are missing the point, it isn't wether the climate is changing or not, it is, it has always 'changed' the point is; can you give money to 'someone'and they can stop it changing, perhaps they can if you believe they can, the power of belief is very important and very potent in American life, I know a man who will sell you the winning numbers for the Lottery and he guarantees they are winners, if you believe they are, he can point you in the rught direction but it is up to you to believe them into reality, if you don't win it is your fault so there are no refunds!
If the climate is changing it is best to adapt ourselves to the new reality rather than give your money to a con man and expect him to modify the weather.
Only moar regulation, bureaucracy & taxation can save the fucking planet from "climate change" does seem to be the underlying message from the "climate hysterics".
They seem to forget the "folks" they want to put in charge of all that newfound power & wealth are the VERY SAME ONES who start foreign wars, send SWAT teams into homes and shoot people in the back, can't balance the national checkbook and implemented ObamaCare.
And the hysterics call us crazy deniers...lol.
and these were the same 'folks' who were all over global cooling in the '70s.
- Ned
If one mechanic makes a mistake upon your auto... you no longer use mechanics to repair your vehicle?
I imagine the same with dentistry for you correct?
Brutally ironic the party separation equivalent in regards to the weather.
As well as the inundation of hearsay proclamations.
The primary concern of climate change critters is loss is funding.
You are programmed to rebel against those whose concern is funding?
Tell me, in America are there any exceptions to such?
The whole COUNTRY is fund addicted and as above, divided and conquered.
Let us assume this is fabricated for finding as well. Seems to correlate with
my records as well. Hhhhmmm my name must be Gore.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/something-alarming-happening-gulf-maine-20...
It's the rate of change, Sparkey. Adaptation takes time...
Point taken Meanbusiness, still, do you think (believe) we can spend money and slow down the rate of change, can the rate of change be quantified, is change happening exponentially?
There are two primary drivers of the behavior of the elite class, the desire for 'Importance" and the desire for "More Wealth" People can only be important in their own minds and the minds of others, there is no importance outside human thought, money is a potent prop on a rich persons stage, possibly the most important, as it elicites the desired adulation from a large segment of the audience.
To me, we as a species are doomed by the limitations of our understanding of the World and our place in it, we have all seen those pictures from the shuttle where, at night, the World looks like it is on fire, instinct gone awry, is driving us to destroy everything in a vain attempt to keep those lights burning even if just for a little longer!
The world continues to warm at a rapid rate. This is what was said by the lead author, Dr. Chris Fields at the IPCC AR5 WG2 press release. 1:25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bZONwnqWFe8I believe at this point all we are doing is TRYING to buy a little time. Yeah, it'll be expensive but...
Why won't the system let me down vote this "Pinch" tool? Oh. Itallics. Cheating cunt.
And why are all the brand new trolls shown as being 4 year plus veterans?
I smell something.
And why are all the brand new trolls shown as being 4 year plus veterans? I smell something.
You're right, TBS. You just started a new conspiracy theory.
sleeper cell
Pinch - "More idiotic right wing climbate denial..."
Here is the latest from NASA's own web site
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
The more you search for the truth, the easier it is to see through the lie.
Global warming conspiracy theorists can "Pinch" a loaf
SO who you gonna call? Ghost Busters?
1st was loss, now ice gain. Which do you KNOW is true.
Or is the word of US GVMT NASA holy.
Secondly, divide and conquer with belief like the church.
Nothing like a Gulf of Tonkin mind change. Or maybe USS Maine. The Love Canal was a doozy as well, how about DDT, or WMD, or.... the list of relevant divide and conquering of WE the PEOPLE is fukn massive. Keep it going BOOmahs cuz we know you believe in the word of god you hear, when talking to yourself.
I do not care if there is more ice based upon correction of mistake.
You gonna believe bra, there is a difference man, it's bigger dude.
Wow man these amps go to eleven !
exactly.
@Pinch Nazi:
Fucking christ ona cracker, yes the Earth has been warming for 20,000 fucking years, since the glacial maximum of the Wisconsin Ice Age. CAN/WOULD YOU DENY THAT??? What do you suppose kicked that off?
You think you can infer "climate change" on a 100 year time scale, you numbskull???
Shove that hockey stick up your @ss dry.
.
.
The climate has always been changing since the ice age, if not we would still be in the ice age today (duh..)
So what caused the end of the ice-age? Men made CO2?
Christopher Monckton debates Greenpeace activist on the subject of global warming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AB6Ts5qhlT8
Monckton vs Greenpeace: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxIjygRPpmk
The Great Global Warming Swindle Full Movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52Mx0_8YEtgThe scientific term is "adjusted".
Plus throwing out the low temps because they are obviously wrong, unlike the high temps which are more true.
/s
and if we are in a dome-ed flat earth, heating up is a hoax;
or if the heat is radiation, not from the sun (another hoax !?) coz we are all looking at hologram projections...
there, [bad] food for [no] thoughts !?
ever wondered what the back of the moon looks like...
or the moons of Mars that MIC tried to lure humans with bloodline to teleport over...hummmmm?
Science, we don't know sh't, (pun intended).
"Nibiru IS NOT a factor" !
Wave X, huh?
The "Idiot Cartoonist" was an Algore Tells the Truth Denier. If you think Algore = Science, TPTB have you right where they want.
Comment of the day award *****
Dear Brian, here's the truth about global warming in one chart. Data from NASA as collected from 1880-2015. This should scare the shit out of everyone. (/s)
http://www.shotinthedark.info/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/IMG_4458.png
Brian! Bri-man! Long time no see. Five and a half years, where does the time go? Since you are never here, here's the deal: Nobody here buys global warming. Oh sure, there was that one fool. But he was laughed off the set. Also, your god "science" is, well, homeless and begging for grants in The Tenderloin....
Actually there are a few of us who "buy" global warming. Among the scientists, the views are near unanimous. Among the conservative and oil industry-funded groups, that's where the denial comes in.
unanimous? only according to the mainstream media.
pull your head out and lookup peer reviewed papers indexed at http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting...
...or take a look at 30,000+ american scientists who signed the petition-project (i was one of them), at http://www.petitionproject.org/
......or, read the papers that make claim to that 97% figure touted and actually READ them, then come back here and tell me that their methods aren't horseshit.
look, it's that Willie Soon fella again. Please ignore the 30,000 + published climate science related articles that were the basis for the IPCC AR5 published exactly one year ago today,and the ^^^ of 100,000 scientists that would have made those reports possible and spend your time examining 30,000 names that you have no possibility of actually verifying that signed a Dr. Willie Soon based petition that began in 1998. Note that ~10% of those unverifiable names from the distant past (read: nigh on irrelevant in the exponential pace of change in incoming data) are supposedly "climate scientists".
And please ignore that every national academy of science has stated that AGW is likely with an extremely high confidence level.
Please do not read the IPCC AR5. Your time is required to review links at populartechnology.net from 2009, Lucky you.
And be sure to come back y'all!!! You must come back here and TELL Automatic Choke all about your amazing journey of discovery. WOOF.
When Mt. Pinatubo blew, it put more carbon dioxide into the air than all of the human activity since we came down from the trees.
Jesus have mercy. Is that what is taught in schools nowadays? Where have all the engineers and scientists gone?
https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=50
Pinatubo blew for a year. At least thats what I learned getting my PHD in geology. That little 97% of scientists line....bullshit.
Lulz, and I'm the pope.
Your claim was comparing man's total contribution with one vulcano, what difference does it make if it blew for a week or a year. Total vs. total. It's fucking straight forward. Your point quite clearly shows you're simply parroting denialist bollocks.
The list from Popular Technology.net was last updated in 2014. The cut-off date for literature to be accepted in the the IPCC AR5 report was 2012.
Dr. Soon never started the petition, Dr. Arthur Robinson did.
I didn't say Dr. Soon started it, I said it was based on his work.
I would certainly appreciate you pointing me to where the official AR5 cut-off date is as a lot can be produced in 12 months (is it Jan 2012? Decmber?). I have heard the criticism that the IPCC process prevents recent info being included but that would likely bear some weight in the final language of the Summary for Policy Makers?
The Petition Project had absolutely nothing to do with Dr. Soon and was started by Dr Arthur Robinson. It was not based on anybody elses work.
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ar5/ar5-cut-off-dates.pdf
The 'petition project' link Automatic Choke supplied leads to a petition where there is a link to "Summary of peer-reviewed research". There is a link / document on that page http://www.petitionproject.org/gw_article/GWReview_OISM150.pdf
called "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" by Arthur B. Robinson, Noah E. Robinson, and Willie Soon.
------------------
Thanks for the link to the cut-off dates. It's no surprise that WG1 needed to have submissions by July 31 2012 because they publish earlier (Sep 2014). WG2 and WG3 had until 31JAN13 which gave them ~14 months to complete and publish, Why the IPCC process employs cut-off dates at all is a good question but there must be some kind of rationale.
Since there are no submissions for WG4, and that some up to date info being excluded in ARs is a known issue ( for example Typhoon Haiyan that Michel Jarraud refered to in the WG2 press release), as I stated above, this is likely a consideration in drafting the synthesis report.
Here is the 97 % Scam explained (the actual papers)
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/category/97-scam/
And just for fun, The French mathematicians are a bit upset : http://www.scmsa.eu/archives/SCM_RC_2015_08_24_EN.pdf
I suspect no one "Denies" climate change, just the cause.
For every wind/sea turbine/Solar panel, you still need the regular power stations, cos sometimes it isn't windy, tides turn 4 times a day or it's night time (and sometimess all 3)
Come on Rocky, the whole deal is about control not "science".
As a reminder to the zealots and their astounding assumptions about the miracle molecule; the highly esteemed purveyors of the famed acceleration and the need for spending $Trillions was shredded years ago. (Shouldn't use proxies when real world measurements are available). I guess that having a statistician review a statistical model is not sciency.
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/WegmanReport.pdf
Gotta love those French mathematicians, quoting Victor Hugo... solid logic and a well presented paper by SCM.
You don’t have to buy the ’global-warming’-meme to see (pretty obvious) that we as a spices are experimenting with the capacity of the ecosystem of which we’re a part. I don’t care if it leads to global warming or not but the amount of destruction is unfathomable – the oceans/coral reefs/plastic islands, mass-instinction of flora and fauna, cutting down of forests, expansion of desserts etc. etc.
But then again, I’m with Carlin: we’re only put here temporarily to produce plastic – plastic will be the power-supply of the next spices with a brain.
A majority of the ZH-crowd see themselves as ‘informed’, ‘awakened’, ‘took the red pill’ etc. etc. – in reality they are controlled opposition. In the pockets of the Koch-brothers or similar. Don’t look at the down-arrows – truth is not a democratic issue.
"that we as a spices"
Ooh, I wanna be a pepper. I wanna be realllllly spicy!
"plastic will be the power-supply of the next spices with a brain."
Many spices are packaged in plastic. It's kinda scary thinking that those dried parsley flakes may actually be sentient though. Just downright terrifying at times!
English is my third language. How good are you at other languages than your mothertongue?
evidently only your second-and-a-half.
Someone (Thoreau?) has written that one person right constitutes a majority.
Denial is spawned by the known majority who has vehemently avoided accountability since 1945.
The planet is becoming an industrial consumer wasteland.
No worries, the next generations will clean while being poisoned, pay for it within and around, be taxed, charged, restricted, and deep throated more future "plans" for cleaning changes, but, but, but, but, but, not now. The majority in power of govt top down, consumer, home ownership, etc has NO interest in accountability. Look to what you have bred because bread you will not be leaving behind, only an pan.
Say, Yes there is, no there is not, yes thers IS, NO there is NOT, HEY ! I said there is, NO I said and I meant it. and on and on and on.
Pollution is the problem, all forms and you, the majority is arguing by design who is right and who is wrong. We ALL are operating detrimentally so in the western world. Keep on guzzling all the commodities, no worries we'll fly in some more, from .......?
I am ready to see the trains and knocking on the doors of the majority.
As is well demonstrated the majority knows, "They will not knock on my door"
Knock knock MF's time is almost up.
"...Nobody here buys global warming. Oh sure, there was that one fool.."
That would be Flakmeister in heat
By your logic, Al gore = Science? Good luck with that.
Tyler must be a composite.
I am very much looking forward to small government, too. Why not end the torturous debate and do away with government altogether after you have studied how that pans out in Libya and Somalia. You do not have to reinvent the wheel - check it out.
Unlike Lybia or Somalia we have an enlightened populace
Looks like you have been hit up with down votes. Are you going to tell me about science? Please tell. As far as comics - where were you picked/grown?
Look everyone, Willie Soon has dropped in to join the conversation. Too bad I'm dropping off to sleep. ZZZZZZZ
"Too bad I'm dropping off to sleep. ZZZZZZZ"
Well, it is late, and I'm sure your momma has been calling down into the basement to remind you to brush your teeth and put your jammies on.
Tell her we all said howdy!
First we were headed for the next ice age, then it was global warming. When that didn't sell, the changed it to climate change. That was an easier sell because of course there is climate change. There has always been climate change. The dinosaurs disappeared during the ice age.
The point of contention is not climate change itself, but the ACTUAL cause of climate change. Al Gore and his ilk would like you to believe that it is all man made so they have an excuse to tax you even more in order to waste more money trying to control your life and fill their own wallets in the process. The data of which there is only 150 years worth (a small blip in the history of the earth) is anything but conclusive. Until concretely proven otherwise, I believe that climate change is a stellar event and we just need to adapt. In the meantime, it is logical to seek safe renewable sources of energy and lessen our dependence on fossil fuels. One day the earth will run out of gas and oil although no one knows when. The fact is we live on a finite planet with finite resources. To ignore that fact is perilous but it has nothing to do with climate change, just common sense.
The 'A' in AGW isn't too hotly contested anymore. As for "ilk", what do you think Putin means when he says:
"Admittedly, we may be able to defuse it for a while by introducing emission quotas and using other tactical measures, but we certainly will not solve it for good that way."
? I read that as carbon tax and/or cap & trade, among other mechanisms?
We always are headed for an ice age.
Great meaning "cause" which is a viable.
Surely the known majority will say "yeah, I agree we should something".
Then do absolutely nothing. Unless a marketable convenience in the green
is purveyed. Even if contradictory.
Got Prius?
Time accelerates as one gets older, so change there is no time for.
Tick tock tick tock almost gone now, majority.
Brian, did realize you were a fucktard troll. Think no-one noticed? Get a clue and let me tell you about this thing your betters have discovered called research.
Another name for what you call "editorial scrutiny" is CENSORSHIP.
Like how the peer reviewed journals censor out anything that might threaten the flow of cash they get for parroting the climate change bullshit.
Your new here (yes you are) so let me save you some time.
You are so far out of your depth here that you should simply desist.
Maybe go and read a few of the thousands of papers that refute the religion you seem to support.
Good dog Brian. I think I can hear you tube calling you.
Brian could start with Kuhn, but dem wordz b biiiiig!
Hey Brian do you realize every time you exhale you are releasing carbon dioxide into the atmoshpere? You're contributing to global warming, stop breathing man!!!!
The data supporting man-made global warming is a load of crap. It's falsified, self-serving information that's anything but science. The climate may be changing, but the climate has always changed. Are we as humans accelerating this in some way? Possibly, but you and your ilk want all of us to make dramatic life changes to fix something you can't even put your finger on. Grow up.
-Argenta
It's the lag time Argenta. Everything is awesome! oh wait...
"Now we are at the point where some of the excuses which were used in Copenhagen 2009 for not taking action, which was basically some uncertainties on some of the questions, although there was a lot of evidence on many of them, now is no longer valid.
It's no longer tenable. Ignorance can no longer be used as an excuse for no action and this is a fundamental difference compared to 2009. Why? Because in 50 years from now, actually in 30 years from now, governments, but not only governments, decisions makers at all levels can be held accountable for the decisions which are not taken now. Because knowledge is there. WE KNOW. We have no excuse for no action. Thank You."
Dr. Michell Jarraud, Secretary General World Meteorological Organization, 02NOV14 in Copenhagen speaking at the IPCC AR5 WG4 press release.
Prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
Do nothing and be like the rest.
The majority is line 2.
Reactionary mentality, which waits to be forced rather than choose, completely unbecoming. There are millions upon millions of those small view minds.
How else would the hole be so deep.
Change and/or the ability to perform such is graceful.
Fear of change, not so much.
the embarassing thing is Cruz wasn't born in the US and evidently just having a US parent is enough....kind of makes the GOP look silly
Barry had one american parent the other was a communist, that abandon him to be raised by lobo soetoro.
My impression is that POTUS position is not what it's cracked up to be, hence the low quality candidates.
Photoshop facimile in multi-layer PDF document is not sufficient!?
Never see -> A banker going to jail, outside of Iceland.
Never see a camel-toe on Michelle O.
Hillary telling the truth.
Or his marriage certificate to Michelle.
DavidC
"Things You'll Never See – You’ll never see my goat fucking a frog."
How about a muzzie frog in France fucking a goat?
Federal Reserve raise interest rate.
A skyscraper fall into it's own footprint because of fire.
Man land on moon using 1960s technology with 4-bit 16Kbyte telemetry computer, take 3,000 photograph and motion footage in 19 hour while conduct numerous science experiment in radiation proof environmental suit, rejoin orbital module, return to earth, and not visit again for 45 year.
Boris.
Best comment on ZH to awaken the masses in a long time.
Few will pay attn.
Boris is apologize for touch nerve of ZHer who is strenuous hold fast to Amerika claim of man on moon.
Boris is full of AlotOfShit.
It comes from His Mouth, instead of his Ass.
Or is that really two of the same, from the Very Same Orifice.
Yeah, that's the ticket.
Boris is even more deeply apologize to patient with Tourette affliction.
Boris needs ignore ignorant savage.
Amurika put multiple missions to "moon".
Then said shit on it.
Technology, too much expensive, how to do surround sound for stage in 1970 tecknology. Just too fuckin' much.
But 'Murika beat Russian infidel commies to the moon...while they rode rings around US with real space program.
Well, Russia is still active space program, is for hire to USSA and other international customer. All is thank you to German Rocket Scientist in Russia:
http://www.russianspaceweb.com/a4_team_moscow.html
But Amerikanski is can thank you for Werner Von Braun:)
come to think of it, russia still has no man on moon after moar than half century...
perhaps warned by same aliens who caused apollo to "go away"?
And now they're shooting towards mars where we humans reportedly originated from?
Hubble the MOON.
NASA spit up some sickly detailed Hubble shots of the moon landing site.
Footprints, trash, landing equipment, f-ing anything, "left behind".
yeah right.
Wasn't James Bond the first in the moon in Nevada?
Same satellite is photograph portable WMD trailer in Saddam Hussein Iraq. Ooops.
But but but... this time they will want to show the truth. s.
The A bomb and V2 rocket were made by 1945 with slide rulers, chalk boards, and hand made drawings.
Boris is suspect A Bomb and V2 rocket is more require even rudimentary milling machine to make not just chalk board. Neither is travel 384,000 km to interstellar body with live human and return. You do math!
I have. Have you?
The Soviet Union would have exposed it as a fraud, Boris. It was in their POLITICAL INTERESTS to do that.
You now what your former Government was like THEN...as MINE IS NOW unfortunately.
Radio transmissions during Spaceflight are Doppler shifted. The Soviets were using the Jodrell Bank radio telescope to track the speed and position of the spacecraft.
Ever been speeding and been nailed by radar?
Radar tracks both distance and speed and when used for weapons targetting it is quite affective at determining a solution.
Radio waves relay a lot of information, Boris...not just fine music.
Dear Mr.Tom,
Former Soviet people maybe is some believe Amerikanski Lunar Landing claim, but remember, same Soviet is full on believe Mr. Reagan Star Wars program. Stalin is believe Lysenko junk agricultural program. People are believe what people are believe. Because someone is believe half truth, that is not logical conclusion that therefore is true... That is crazy talking!
Frankly, Boris is not know if Amerikansky is make it to mooon. Would like to see original telemetry tape, but... oops, NASA is erase or lose tape. Is sound a bit like is Lois Lerner IRS email scandal or Hillary Clinton Benghazi scandal. Who is erase or record over most important monumental piece of mankind history!? Who is constantly lose email? What about is losing Kennedy autopsy photograph or damage one photograph which is show fifth floor Houston Library Depository?
Please, you are believe everything USSA government is tell you? You are not familiar with Waco Texas Camp Davidian massacre or Ruby Ridge Massacre? You are think you are safe in little pink house?
If you are rely on USSR government with own evil agenda to to expose evil agenda of USSA government, maybe you are wait long long time because when is convenient, evil is easy to conspire with evil.
... but what is Boris know!?
Sincerely,
Boris
Dear Mr. Tom
P.S., here is link for lost telemetry tape from USSA own NPR reporting staff and other "credible source":
2006 - Search is on to find telemetry tape:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5578853
2008 - Looking for tape in ... Australia!?
http://www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum29/HTML/000617.html
http://www.parkes.atnf.csiro.au/news_events/apollo11/The_Apollo11_SSTV_T...
2009 - Discover tape is only... simulation?
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106637066
NASA engineer staff is "dissappointed". Oh, well... here is final report:
https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/Apollo_11_TV_Tapes_Report.pdf
You are cannot making this up!
Sincerely,
Boris
Mr. Tom,
Here is more. The specification of Apollo Guidance Computer.
2MHz crystal
4096 byte of RAM (2048 word x 16-bit word length)
Actual Word Length in RAM was 15-bit with a odd-parity bit
72 kbyte of ROM (36 kword x 16-bit word length)
Actual Word Length is 14-bit because of extra carry bit and one sign bit.
RAM is not fully integrated, but requiring 4,100 individual IC Package with 3-input NOR gate on each.
Source: Wikipedia
Now, compare to first iPhone, and ask why USSA is cannot even get single ship in lunar orbit any more?
Thank you for the reading.
We can but are bugetary imbeciles.
You know that I do not believe everything that the USSA reports...or even Russia for that matter.
Most..er...ALL...of the computing was not done in the crew compartment of the LM or CM. The computer was obviously rudimentary, primitive, and the settings were on firing of engines and setting course.
The onboard computer was more of a timing decice than a computer.
All computations were run at the computer at Houston, Texas, NASA Mission Control which was the state of the art at the time.
It took up two entire floors of a very large building. The inputs to the onbard computer were radioed to the LM/CM and fed into the onboard computer with a punch button keypad.
No I do not believe everything that the USSA tells me..
But I do believe that NASA pulled off Kennedy's trick...at a very great expense.
As for your last question it was addressed below in another response to another commenter...in detail...but ties in.
NASA is bloated and inefficient due to bureaucracy and boondoggles.
While we are at this bullshit game of "Nationalistic Pride"...
Why can't Russia land and operate an unmanned probe on Mars?
Respectfully...
Dear Mr.Tom:
Main reason Boris is suspicious of Lunar Hoax is not from false Lunar Hoax propoganda, but simple Bureaucratic mistake of NASA Goddard. For example, in 19 hour surface mission of Apollo 11, there is record of over 1,800 35mm and 120mm (Hassleblad) slide and negative. Even with special Hassleblad film back, Boris is safe assume that in and out of module, re-pressurize, remove glove, reload flim cartridge, decompress, and exit module is not option. Thus weight of film cartridge alone is more than single weight of astronaught for 1,800 frame worth of film. This is inexplicable. Frame rate, not include motion camera shot, is 100 exposure EVERY hour on surface. That is more than one every minute. Amazing studio quality photography is come from awkward ratiation proof environmental suit while wearing, no!?
Worst case, entire mission is massive hoax and only technology from Lunar program is benefit George Lucas from Blue Screen and Sound Stage advancement. Best case, American public is demand some proof of lunar landing and after botch photographic expedition, crew is return to sound stage for better shot and stupid errand boy is record all of bracket exposure in photo lab docket, so now Goddard is stuck with record of 1,800 exposure frame from surface mission.
This is Boris' main thesis until 2009 when Telemetry tape is cannot find. Boris give up! Want to believe in endeavor of humanity to go beyond earth, but apply razor of occam is just no longer can believe.
Russia is still use 1960 rocket technology because, "it is not rocket science"! (but of course it is, but just not so hard once you are figure out rocket gyro and stabilizer and right mixutre of fuel) Mars Rover...? Russia can do but is not so interesting when war in Chechnya, Syria, and Chrimea to fight after lose war in Afghanistan.
Sincerely,
Boris
Boris is up-arrow for Mr.Tom because is interesting engage in debate. We are maybe disagree, but are not disagree ad hominem. Please we are continue debate!
Indeed a civilised debate is refreshing on ZH.
I agree with Boris on the matters of the moon landing. But appreciate Tall Tom's comments.
Same Same
When Occam's is wielded, moon no visited.
Hey, but Teflon proves it!! ;-)
Survey is say... more than 50% of ZHer is not believe Amerikansky claim of lunar landing.
Later in day, ratio of Lunar "Truther" is now 2:1. If you are believe in Global Warming because consensus, well, you are cannot believe Lunar Landing for same reason, No?
ZHer is now cross over 3:1 ration of non-believer in Amerkanski Lunar Landing Lie (please to pardon abuse of alliteration).
I think Stanley Kubrick was director of faked moon landings, does Boris agree?
Perpetrator of global financial fraud charge and arrest.
Things We'll Never See:
"This note certifies that there is on deposit [#] dollars in gold/silver within the Treasury of the United States, payable to the bearer on demand."
I currently hold some of those notes. i am looking at a US Treasury Issued Silver Certificate as I write this.
Oh I know that they will not redeem it. But i will see it...again...and again...and again.
That was cute.
kudo's to the multiple cartoonists.
If these creative individuals used 2-3/10th's of their true potential, we'ldabreviation all be JetsonsTM
Fourth panel is a dead giveaway - MSM never asks Paul a direct question.
Add: "We're bringing our troops home" or "We will audit the FED" or "Jon Corzine has been arrested" or "The .N.S.A.'s surveillance is unconstitutional" or "The C.I.A. assassinated J.F.K." or "We, the people of the Armed Forces of the United States, are acting under our oath to end the corruption of Washington and Wall Street and restore the Constitution."
Mooshelle's moose knuckle
...And thank the Good Lord for that.
Who would want to?
Carly Fiorina telling the truth...
Donald Trump with his mouth closed ....
A republican scientist ....
The USA not bombing someone ....
A Democrat that is not a COMMUNIST!
People named Bill that aren't flaming douchebags?
Stndad Disclaimer: I swear these things just pop into my head out of nowhere.
I am a published scientist and served as an Iowa state GOP delegate two times. My research group (chemical engineering) had a few such people. Granted, I am more libertarian than mainstream Republican, but the others were mainstream.
The rest are about right though.
(btw, I finally got around to fixing the typo in my username)
Here's the thing about science. There are plenty of scientists who are blinded by ideology, both left and right. Usually, chemical and ag fields attract more "conservatives" because those industries tend to have more of that type, wheras fields that deal more with people tend to be more left-leaning. There are exceptions on either side of course, but control freaks of all stripes can get their kicks in academia.
Since I was in Iowa, I saw more than a few people working hard on creating more potent GMOs in various senses, because they really do think they are helping you. Or people doing research on the next generation of SSRIs who really do think they will improve the national mental health. I think there is a cult-like belief that all scientists are hyper-logical. They are not, they are simply very good at their technical field.
There were also more "alt" people than you would expect, and these types tend to have internalized the joke about the Russians using a pencil. They, in turn, are looking for their own "pencil" in energy research, disease research, etc., but the problem is they get no funding directly for it. The federal agencies want the super-pen, not the pencil.
Governments are formed to protect your rights, not steal from some for pet projects of others.
What Nirvana do you live in?!
Anything that can be developed will be developed...where the cost is not considered when given the blank check.
The boondoggle of Mike Griffen's Project Constellation stands as testimony to that sad fact.
The fool was developing Lunar Habitats and Lunar Rovers and did not even bother developing the Ares V, the rocket to get it there in the first place.. He put the proverbial cart before the horse.
He dismantled the infrastructure at Michoud and started the retooling for a larger diameter Rocket. He destroyed the Pad Infrastructure at Pad 39 A & B.
As a result NASA is without a Human Spaceflight Capability and is reliant upon the graces...YES GRACES after all the bullshit that we have been up to...the GRACES of the Russians to put Astronauts in orbit.
Mike Griffen absolutely ignored the directive to use EXISTING TECHNOLOGY which he could have done by adopting the concepts of Project Direct.
But we do have a pen that writes in Zero G while the Russians are dependent on those damned pencils.
Grants are what most scientist (and their academic institutions) want to discover.
Not to be picky, but wouldn't medical doctors fall in to the scientist category? Dr.s Paul and Carson would be 2 republican ones.
Perhaps you meant 'a republican junk science advocate shilling for more federal intrusion/FUNDING'?
Have a drink Bill......
All I can agree with you is.
"The USA not bombing someone ...."
The rest is political vile.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/yale-study-tea-partiers-rank-highest-sc...
According to Yale, the further to the political right, the more knowledge one is in science.
Funny thing is, the professor was try to prove the opposite.
"According to Yale, the further to the political right, the more knowledge (sic) one is in science."
I didn't bother to read the study, but I know one thing for sure:
Once you've studied the laws of thermodynamics, the scales drop from your eyes, and (to mix metaphors) the scale of government abuse is suddenly evident.
I doubt these scientists are farther to the political right in the sense that they are neocon hawks; I would expect them to be more libertarian than anything else.
I'm looking forward to Part II
5). An optimistic article on ZH.
Optimism is for socialists. Reality is much more depressing.
You will never see Obama, or a Clinton tell the truth.
A Palestinian chairman of the Federal Reserve.
A human Chairman of the Federal Reserve.
michelle obama and Sasquatsch in the same room.
Those two in the same room would be redundant.
You only have to squint your eyes and ...presto!
the saudi arabia one is funny
A democrat that loves America, the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the rule of law, the right to life, and the 2nd amendment.
Jim O'Neil oops. Goldman fucknob on BRICS.
http://brics.itamaraty.gov.br/about-brics/information-about-brics