This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
"A Thin-Skinned Minority Is Ruining This Nation": Professor Crushes "Political Correctness" Wave Sweeping America
In a time where college students are offended by pretty much everything, The Federalist Papers reports that one professor at UNC-Wilmington decided to cut through the rhetoric and let his students know that they aren’t the special snowflakes liberals and their parents would have them believe.
His epic class introduction has gone viral, and for good reason: this is the most common sense lecture to come out of any college in a long time.
Welcome back to class, students! I am Mike Adams your criminology professor here at UNC-Wilmington. Before we get started with the course I need to address an issue that is causing problems here at UNCW and in higher education all across the country. I am talking about the growing minority of students who believe they have a right to be free from being offended. If we don’t reverse this dangerous trend in our society there will soon be a majority of young people who will need to walk around in plastic bubble suits to protect them in the event that they come into contact with a dissenting viewpoint. That mentality is unworthy of an American. It’s hardly worthy of a Frenchman.
Let’s get something straight right now. You have no right to be unoffended. You have a right to be offended with regularity. It is the price you pay for living in a free society. If you don’t understand that you are confused and dangerously so. In part, I blame your high school teachers for failing to teach you basic civics before you got your diploma. Most of you went to the public high schools, which are a disaster. Don’t tell me that offended you. I went to a public high school.
Of course, your high school might not be the problem. It is entirely possible that the main reason why so many of you are confused about free speech is that piece of paper hanging on the wall right over there. Please turn your attention to that ridiculous document that is framed and hanging by the door. In fact, take a few minutes to read it before you leave class today. It is our campus speech code. It specifically says that there is a requirement that everyone must only engage in discourse that is “respectful.” That assertion is as ludicrous as it is illegal. I plan to have that thing ripped down from every classroom on campus before I retire.
One of my grandfathers served in World War I. My step-grandfather served in World War II. My sixth great grandfather enlisted in the American Revolution when he was only thirteen. These great men did not fight so we could simply relinquish our rights to the enemy within our borders. That enemy is the Marxists who run our public universities. If you are a Marxist and I just offended you, well, that’s tough. I guess they don’t make communists like they used to.
Unbelievably, a student once complained to the Department chairwoman that my mention of God and a Creator was a violation of Separation of Church and State. Let me be as clear as I possibly can: If any of you actually think that my decision to paraphrase the Declaration of Independence in the course syllabus is unconstitutional then you suffer from severe intellectual hernia.
Indeed, it takes hard work to become stupid enough to think the Declaration of Independence is unconstitutional. If you agree with the student who made that complaint then you are probably just an anti-religious zealot. Therefore, I am going to ask you to do exactly three things and do them in the exact order that I specify.
First, get out of my class. You can fill out the drop slip over at James Hall. Just tell them you don’t believe in true diversity and you want to be surrounded by people who agree with your twisted interpretation of the Constitution simply because they are the kind of people who will protect you from having your beliefs challenged or your feelings hurt.
Second, withdraw from the university. If you find that you are actually relieved because you will no longer be in a class where your beliefs might be challenged then you aren’t ready for college. Go get a job building houses so you can work with some illegal aliens who will help you gain a better appreciation of what this country has to offer.
Finally, if this doesn’t work then I would simply ask you to get the hell out of the country. The ever-growing thinned-skinned minority you have joined is simply ruining life in this once-great nation. Please move to some place like Cuba where you can enjoy the company of communists and get excellent health care. Just hop on a leaky boat and start paddling your way towards utopia. You will not be missed.
* * *
Professor Adams - having tenure - is more open to attack the ongoing Cultural Marxism that is sweeping across the nation. But, as we previously noted, there are very few legitimate cultural divisions in the world. Most of them are arbitrarily created, not only by political and financial elites, but also by the useful idiots and mindless acolytes infesting the sullied halls of academia.
It is perhaps no mistake that cultural Marxists in the form of "social justice warriors", PC busybodies and feminists tend to create artificial divisions between people and “classes” while attacking and homogenizing very real and natural divisions between individuals based on biological reality and inherent genetic and psychological ability.
This is what cultural Marxists do: divide and conquer or homogenize and conquer, whatever the situation happens to call for.
They do this most commonly by designated arbitrary "victim status" to various classes, thus dividing them from each other based on how "oppressed" they supposedly are. The less statistically prominent a particular group is (less represented in a job field, media, education, population, etc.) in any western society based on their color, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, etc., generally the more victim group status is afforded to them by social justice gatekeepers. Whites and males (straight males) are of course far at the bottom of their list of people who have reason to complain and we are repeatedly targeted by SJW organizations and web mobs as purveyors of some absurd theory called "the patriarchy".
Although cultural marxism does indeed target every individual and harm every individual in the long run, my list of personal solutions outlined in this article will be directed in large part at the categories of people most attacked by the social justice cult today.
...
It is not enough anymore to simply continue pointing out the insanity of political correctness; we must also take useful steps toward reversing the destruction already wrought.
And so, here are my solutions, which must be enacted by individuals in their daily lives regardless of the potential backlash. Do you have leftist leaning friends or family members? It doesn’t matter. Are you employed in a workplace crawling with social justice ideologues? Stop seeing them as part of the equation because they do not matter. Worried about losing a relationship if you make a stand? Say good riddance. This is what must be done by free thinkers if they are to counter and reverse the collectivist nightmare of cultural Marxism.
Feel no shame: Social justice relies on shaming tactics, usually by slandering an opponent with a label that does not really apply to him, in order to control his arguments and behavior. If you don’t care about being called a bigot, a racist, a sexist, a misogynist, a homophobe, etc., then there is not really much that they can do to you.
Do not self-censor: This does not mean you should go out of your way to be antagonistic or act like an ass, but the thought police have power only if you give power to them. Say what you want to say when you want to say it, and do it with a smile. Let the PC police froth and scream until they have an aneurism. Cultural Marxists are generally weaklings. They avoid physical confrontation like they avoid logic, so why fear them?
Realize there is no such thing as white privilege or male privilege: In reality, there is only institutionalized “privilege” for victim-status groups. There is no privilege for whites, males, white males or straight white males. When confronted with such claims, demand to see proof of such privilege. Invariably, you will get a long list of first world problems and complaints backed by nothing but easily debunked talking points and misrepresented statistics. People should not feel guilty for being born the way they are, and this includes us “white male devils.”
Demand facts to back claims: Cultural Marxists tend to argue on the basis of opinion rather than fact. Present facts to counter their claims, and demand facts and evidence in return. Opinions are irrelevant if the person is not willing to present supporting facts when asked.
Do not play the game of "unconscious bias": If social justice cultists can't counter your position with facts or logic, they will invariably turn to the old standby that you are limited in your insight because you have not lived in the shoes of a - (insert victim group here). I agree. In fact, I would point out that this reality of limited perception also applies to THEM as well. They have not lived in my shoes, therefore they are in no position to claim I enjoy "privilege" while they do not. This is why facts and evidence are so important, and why anecdotal evidence and personal feelings are irrelevant where cultural Marxism is concerned.
Let cultural Marxists know their fears and feelings do not matter: No one is entitled to have teir feelings addressed by others. And, a person’s fears are ultimately unimportant. Whether the issue is the nonexistent “rape culture” or the contempt cultural Marxists feel over private gun ownership, their irrational fears are not our concern. Why should any individual relinquish his liberties in the name of placating frightened nobodies?
Demand that society respect your inherent individual rights: Collectivism’s ultimate propaganda message is that there is no such thing as inherent rights or liberties and that all rights are arbitrary and subject to the whims of the group or the state. This is false. I have written extensively in the past on inherent rights, inborn psychological contents and natural law, referencing diverse luminaries, scientists and thinkers, including Thomas Aquinas, Carl Gustave Jung, Steven Pinker, etc., and I welcome readers to study my many articles on individualism. Freedom is an inborn conception with universally understood aspects. Period. No group or collective is more important than individual liberty. No artificial society has preeminence over the individuals within that society. As long as a person is not directly impeding the life, liberty, prosperity and privacy of another person, he should be left alone.
Maintain your rights; they do not hurt other people: PC cultists will invariably argue that every person, whether he knows it or not, is indirectly harming others with his attitude, his beliefs, his refusal to associate, even his very breathing. "We live in a society", they say, "and everything we do affects everyone else...". Don’t take such accusations seriously; these people do not understand how freedom works.
Say, for instance, hypothetically, that I refuse to bake a gay wedding cake for a couple and I am accused of violating their rights in the name of preserving my own. I would immediately point out that no one is entitled to a gay wedding cake, baked by me or anyone else and I have every right to choose my associations based on whatever criteria I see fit. Now, a corrupt government entity may claim I do not have that right. But the fact is I do, and no one — not even government — can force me to bake a cake if I don’t want to. Also, I would point out that the gay couple in question has every right in a free society to bake their OWN damn cake or open their own cake shop to compete with mine. This is how freedom works. It is not based on collective entitlement; it is based on personal responsibility.
Refuse to deny the scientific fact of biological gender: Gender is first and foremost a genetic imperative. Society does not determine gender roles; nature does. A man who chops up his body and takes hormone pills to look like a woman is not and will never be a woman. A woman who tapes down her breasts and gets a short haircut will never be a man. There is no such thing as “transgendered” people. No amount of social justice or wishful thinking will ever allow them to reverse their genetic proclivities. Their psychological and sexual leanings do not change their inborn biological reality.
By extension, we should refuse to play along with this nonsense. I will never refer to a man in a wig and dress as a “woman.” I will never refer to a woman with identity issues as “transgendered.” They are what nature made them, and we should not police our pronouns just to falsely reassure them that they can deny nature.
Deny the illusion of Utopian equality: There is no such thing as pure equality. Society is not a homogeneous entity, it is an abstraction built around a group of unique individuals. Individuals can be naturally gifted, or naturally challenged. But there will always be some people who are more apt towards success than others.
I have no problem whatsoever with the idea of equality of opportunity, which is exactly what we have in this country (except in the world of elitist finance which is purely driven by nepotism). I do have a problem with the lie of universal equality through engineered means.
Standards of success should not be lowered in order to accommodate the least skilled people to facilitate artificial parity. For example, I constantly hear the argument that more people with victim group status should be given greater representation in positions of influence and regard within our culture, from science and engineering, to media, to business CEO's, to politics, etc. The key word here is "given", rather than "earned". There is nothing wrong with one group of people excelling in a field more than another group, and there is nothing wrong with inequality when it comes to individual achievement. We must begin refusing to reward people for mediocrity and punishing success simply because the winners are not part of a designated victim group.
If you are a man, embrace your role: I am a man and cannot claim to know what specific solutions women should take to counter cultural Marxism. I would love to read an article written on the subject by a woman in the Liberty Movement. I will say that men in particular have a considerable task ahead in terms of their personal endeavors if they hope to repair the destruction of social justice.
For thousands of years, men have been the primary industrial force behind human progress. Today, they are relegated to cubicles and customer service, to video games and Web fantasies, to drug addictions and a lack of responsibility. If we have any chance of undoing the damage of cultural Marxism, modern men must take on their original roles as producers, inventors, entrepreneurs, protectors, builders and warriors once again. They should do this for their own benefit, and not for the validation of others.
You don’t have to prove to anyone you do "manly things", just go out and do them. Most importantly, become dangerous. Men are meant to be dangerous beings. That does not mean we are meant to be indiscriminately violent (just as women aren’t meant to be indiscriminately violent), but we are supposed to be threatening to those who would threaten us. Modern society has NOT removed the need for masculinity and I believe people will begin realizing this the more our culture sinks into economic despair. Train in martial arts, learn tactical firearms handling, go hunting and don’t take lip from people. In my opinion, every man should know how to kill things, even if he never plans on using those abilities.
Home-school your children: It’s simple, if you don’t want your kids propagandized, if you truly want them to be free from collectivist conditioning, then you will make the sacrifice and extract them from public schooling. With the introduction of Common Core into U.S. schools in particular, there is no other recourse but home schooling to prevent the brainwashing of cultural Marxism. If you do not do this, you are relying on the hope that your children will escape with their critical thinking abilities intact. Some do, and some don’t. Others turn into mindless social justice zombies. You can give them an advantage by removing them from a poisonous environment, and that is what matters.
The insane lie that cultural Marxists seem to have conned themselves and others into believing is that their “activism” is somehow anti-establishment. In fact, social justice is constantly coddled and supported by the establishment. From politicians to judges to media pundits to the blogosphere, the overwhelming majority of people in positions of traditional power (even in supposedly conservative circles) have been more than happy to become the enforcers of the social justice warrior agenda, an agenda representing a minuscule portion of the public. There is no establishment for the PC army to fight; the establishment bias works vastly more in favor of their ideology than any other. Cultural Marxists ARE the establishment.
* * *
Finally, still having trouble with 'Social Justice Warriors'? Who ya gonna call?
»
- 6137 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
So, what is an Escrava? Care to discuss the political leanings of your country of origin?
Sorry, but my country of origin is not the topic here.
The misuse of the Karl Max is. And it’s horrifying.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFXNnA3KqzA&list=PLa3lFtz3Ass2Yty5sCjY7t4V0rabS9PHG
Who is misusing the term? The people who call themselves Marxists? They are worshipping the methodologies Marx used...they make no bones about that. Just ask them? Chomsky gets that right? Seems he's deflecting. You see that in his claim don't you?
Instead of Marxism the correct term should be 'Bankster Whorism'...but then you would have fewer dissemblers engaging in the polemics of its nuances...
That's six of one and half a dozen of the other.
The Ten Planks of the
Communist Manifesto
1848 by Karl Heinrich Marx
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Even that would be preferable to letting a corporation with no oversight have the exclusive monopoly instead.
A corporation is the most democratic form of business to exist. As a shareholder, you're given a pro rata ownership/vote of the BoD, which in turn select officers, who in turn run the company in which your equity is invested. Go complain to your local government about the roads and see how that works. Moron.
I was talking about the Federal Reserve, your ignorant piece of detritus.
Get off my fucking shoe.
And you know dick about modern shareholder rights; the only right you have now is to try to push your paper at a loss.
If you think the 5th plank of Communism, with a similar nomination process as the SCOTUS, is private I have some ocean front property in Nebraska to sell. Put down the stupid Jekyll Island book and come up with coherent thought.
Here's your coherent thought: your 'nominees' have failed in their mission to reasonably manage inflation for a century and implied powers do not imply the right to abdicate same to unaccountable incompetent assholes.
>>>And you know dick about modern shareholder rights; the only right you have now is to try to push your paper at a loss. <<<<
That is not true. Shareholders have rights but do not exercise them. Additional problem is that many shares are controlled by institutions. Many of these simply vote with the board recommendations.
Personally I would like to see the corporate veil of protection removed. Shareholders should be personally responsible for the actions of the company that they own. I only mean this in a financial sense. So if you have someone like Exxon Mobil ground a oil tanker and trash the environment and along with it the local economy those who hold shares in the company should be responsible tor that damage.
I guarantee you if that was the case people would pay lot more attention to what the management of the corporations they invest in is doing.
Fuck marx
Fuck Obama ass well
If that's your attitude, from henceforth, you shall be known as Sir Stinky Dick!
Sir Reggie Backup
That's funny...I read plenty of Chomsky and had a similar thought about him...
When Chomsky uses the word capitalism, look very closely at his motives.
Supposed "genius" who somehow can't understand the difference between crony/state capitalism and free market capitalism. Or he just doesn't want anyone else to understand it...that's more likely.
And hey NOAM, you write thousands of pages about the corrupt history of the massive US government, so how you gonna control tge BIGGER government you propose is the solution?
He's a gatekeeper. 9-11 Noam? Yeah...I thought so.
Chomsky, on capitalism:
I think the informal economies are more like the model of capitalism than the formal economies. The informal economies are more like what Adam Smith would have called a market. In contrast, the formal economy — the international economy — is a kind of mercantilism, or corporate mercantilism, with administered markets and administered interactions, much of it involving interactions among alleged competitors.
For example, IBM, Toshiba and Siemens might work together on some development project, while they are all supported (in not such complicated ways) by socialization of risk and cost. That has little resemblance to anything an advocate of free markets would support. And these are not small proportions. The numbers we are mentioning, such as the percentage of central administration of cross-border interactions — which we call “trade” — these are undoubtedly large numbers. Similarly, techniques of tax evasion and laundering — what probably lies behind the FDI figures I mentioned before — have not been very closely investigated, as far as I know.
http://chomsky.info/20000303/
Fuck Chomsky
Reggie Fusk Obama
Seems you've reliquished your new title in a mere 5 posts. That didn't last long.
Chomsky, on capitalism:
Are you taking requests? How about, "Chomsky on fire," or "Chomsky on Uranus?"
Chomsky on The W00kie?
Chomsky on...the Fed:
Tell me what job Chomsky has ever had and how it relates in any way to economics, business, or hell, even anything useful in the real world. Don't worry I'm not holding my breath.
I'd explain how his work in linguistics is in part responsible for modern compiler design, but I don't think a dipshit like yourself could appreciate the nuance of anything that can't be milked or harvested.
Linguistics, still trying to connect that with economics. You're cute when you're mad.
And you're still dumb as fuck. All's right with the world.
Someone oughta introduce him to the Ada programming language, that'll keep him busy and out of trouble for quite some time.
he's probably world's best linguist
>>> by socialization of risk and cost. <<<
Socialization?????
That right there shows me that the guyu is a complete fucking tool.
As to the rest of you dickheads that work in the corporate world:
If you do not have a post graduate education do not put some bullshit certification after your name:
Things like
These make you look like an self absorbed idiot. Nobody gives a fuck. It is not impressive.
Stop using words like: socialize, evangelize.
Ask is not a noun, it is a verb.
"Supposed "genius" who somehow can't understand the difference between crony/state capitalism and free market capitalism. Or he just doesn't want anyone else to understand it...that's more likely."
Libertyghost, you are the one who doesn't get that free market capitalism can only result in crony capitalism. It is bound to.
The French Enlightenment philosopher Rousseau said "the wealthy holds the law in his purse". Which, of course, is the exact truth. In a free market environment, there are winners and losers, and of course, the winners will redraft the rules to their advantage - through bribes, corruption, you name it. They will make up whatever rules suit them best, that's a given.
There is nothing anyone can do about this. It's a "might makes right" world where the strongest one wins and writes his own rules. And if he needs the State to enforce them, he gets the State to enforce them, period.
The ones who think that by some miracle, things could turn out otherwise are gullible day-dreamers.
The last half of the article is a quote from a writer here at Zero Hedge by the name of Brandon Smith, not from the professor in question. They are obviously supporting the professor's actions with a little bit of philosphy as background. The professor is following a similar strategy and making waves.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-23/how-stamp-out-cultural-marxism-...
Marx was a promoter of collectivism with tinges Hegelian totalitarianism. Marxism has been repackaged in multiple ways over the decades but it ends the same way every time - tyranny by a mindless majority. It is funny though when Marxists attempt to disassociate themselves from Cultural Marxism as if there is no such thing.
You wrote: tyranny by a mindless majority
It makes no sense. Are you sure you that you didn’t mean to say “Bright Minority?”
Second, it depends who you ask:
According to Chip Berlet, who specializes in the study of extreme right-wing movements, the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory found fertile ground within the Tea Party movement of 2009, with contributions published in the American Thinker and WorldNetDaily highlighted by some Tea Party websites.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School#Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory
No, I meant exactly what I said - a mindless and easily led majority, though I will add that they are usually manipulated by a crafty elitist minority. Without the force of the manipulated mob, the elitist minority has no power.
Cultural Marxism has been a problem for decades, long before it was given attention by the Tea Party, and to insinuate it would not have been a problem otherwise is laughable. The Frankfurt School is not a "conspiracy theory", it is conspiracy fact. Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Eric Fromm and Herbert Marcuse started what would become the roots of Cultural Marxism, which culminated in the Institute For Social Research, and which only deviated from original Marxist theory in minor ways, including in who they argued would be the ultimate revolutionary class ("oppressed" victim groups rather than the working poor). The institute adopted "a dialectical rather than a mechanical understanding of Marxism" according to Berkeley Professor Martin Jay in his 1996 pro-Cultural Marxist book 'The Dialectical Imagination'. The Frankfurt School fled Europe after the rise of Fascism and reestablished itself in New York (what a surprise).
Again, it's funny how some Marxists try to pretend as if Cultural Marxism doesn't exist while others proudly sing its praises.
Blowing smoke words with the intent to arouse anger, while adding a shinny patina to their misinformation.
runningman18,
By introducing all these “isms” the most important aspect of trying to understand get lost in meaningless jargons. And confusion. Just look at the article above. It’s all over the place.
Now, this quote of yours is really worth digging into:
“Without the force of the manipulated mob, the elitist minority has no power.”
It's good to see you back, Escrava.
I missed your precise and well-read comments. Thank you for your efforts, though I am afraid lots of them are lost on your audience here. They are a manipulated mob alright, fighting tooth and nail for the capitalist overlords who fleece them at every possible opportunity.
The very definition of the slave mentality.
slave mentality - the corner stone of the USA
“Start by doing what's necessary; then do what's possible; and suddenly you are doing the impossible.” — Francis of Assisi
Thanks Lea.
So your response to the facts is to misdirect with an empty opinion? Maybe you should go back to quoting Chomsky...
Are you sure you aren't describing any successful hierarchical organization of humans?
We have a long history of following "strong men" under many different guises, often quite blindly, and with tragic result.
Hmm, Pol Pot didn't seem that "bright" to me.
In fact, if history is any indicator, "bright" gets you targeted for execution in the revolution.
Bright gets you targeted for execution AFTER the revolution.
Bright people can be fooled and will make mistakes just as easily as the not so bright.
In many cases they are the ones who cause the chaos because of their hubris and sense of intellectual superiority.
However they can also wake up relatively early on when results do not match expectations.
Many being egotistical idealists also become dangerous to the new power structure and thus are purged.
Meh, all we need is another "Great Leap Forward!"
He's absolutely right. Say what you want about Marx or Marxism, it has absolutely nothing to do with the fascism and crippling idiocy of the social justice warriors. This is not a statement about how good or shitty Marxism is, its just a misnomer. Its no different then assholes who complain about "free markets" while referring to the rigged, centrally controlled economy of the FED.
It the end, it all boils down to one thing - authoritarianism. It doesn't matter what brand of authoritarianism you believe in, whether the fascist policies of the social justice warriors, the fascist policies of those who support the police state and global military empire, or the fascist policies of those who support central banking and government micromanagment. Life is dangerous. Either we accept the dangers posed by freedom or we accept the far worse and more despicable dangers posed by government.
He's absolutely right. Say what you want about Marx or Marxism, it has absolutely nothing to do with the fascism and crippling idiocy of the social justice warriors.
The Ten Planks of the
Communist Manifesto
1848 by Karl Heinrich Marx
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.
10. Free education for all children in government schools.
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.
You obviously do not have to suffer at the hands of the parasitic UK private railway companies.
Communication and transportation are the first things locked down during and after a revolution, then controlled afterwards. We have all been quietly locked down both ways on the pretext of security.
The politically correct shills here on ZH are multiplying
I think they are breeding.
I thought they came here to breed?
Look out, saying "breed" may be a microaggression against women.
You are communist dear. Your president is communist (her father is a bulgarian communist - butcher), and is well known that the communists are non-human entities. Though far not every communist is circumcised (partially penised), all of them are sick from "Chosen People Syndrome".
Post edit:
I don't know what happened. I was replying to a brazilian commy comment, but this since disapear, and seems my reply stay under different comment.
I should point out our marxist friend above is using the name Escrava Isaura. In the 1980s, this TV show from South America played extensively in both China and the Soviet Union. It all about the oppressed masses and their heroic fight. In the end one of the lead characters accidentally drinks her own poison and ends up killing herself. LOL
Noam Chomsky is one of the founders of the ulta left movement in the 1960s....He is part of the political correct movement...
Simple question - what do you do with people like me, or what would Chomsky do with them? I won't work unless I directly profit. If my "profit" is that it benefits society as a whole, and thus me -- I'll stay at home and drink all day.
What do you do with me?
Billy Ayers allowed that there might be as many as 25% of the population who would be incorrigable and who would have to be eliminated.
Yeup, well the Weather Underground discussed the elimination of 25 million Americans when the population was 250 million -- or about 10%. Today, that would be 33 million people, according to them would have to be "eliminated."
I imagine our esteemed Brazilian colleague here would defend the idea of exterminating people like me, if its for the "greater good" which they put above everything. Nevermind if the greater good is actually their extermination and that of their ideals.
A commentator said it above, and I agree wholeheartedly - if we every have "thought crime" it should carried out against collectivists and those who espouse their ideals, as they are the most dangerous thoughts to a democracy.
The more I reflect on society, I think the monarchies back in the day with an armed population had the right model. If they became too tyrannical their head would roll, and if they become pussified, their neighbours would make their heads roll.
You'll never get that answer from a dimwit, braindead socialist (sorry for redundancy). We all know the answer, you'd have to be exterminated. Hell their whole system is predicated on sticking a gun in peoples' face to conform with their mandates and nonsense. Funny - in an anarcho-capitalist society, socialist communities could live in peace. They could live on their own land, live in a commune, be piss poor, nobody gives a shit if they keep to themselves. Love to have the illiterate Brazilian toilet scrubber tell me that an AnCap society would be tolerated in a socialist one. The whole community would be slaughtered and robbed like the rest of the country.
The problem is their fixation on the "greater good" over the individual good. The fail to notice that if everyone is looking out for themselves in the absence of corruption, everyone benefits.
E.g., would you rather be homeless in Germany or homeless in North Korea?
The greater good is an ideal that can be taught -- but never learned. The individual good is the thought process we are hard-wired with after we pop-out of the womb.
C88:
Yep,
“When people uses the word Socialism, you need to look very closely at their motives.” — Noam Chomsky
Corbett simultaneously exposed and destroyed Chumpsky. Got anything else?
The professor confuses "cultural marxism" with a society that has turned inward for a variety of reasons. It's not just university students who are "thin-skinned" you witness this extreme sensitivity in ALL stratas of this society.
A lot of guilt lies in the media and what it perpetrates; whether it's Big Pharma, corporate health care, or inane tv comedies/dramas. The message is: be very afraid. Be very afraid if your child comes down with chickenpox; be very afraid of shady behavior - they be may rapists, murderers, or child abductors. Remember you are, or your teenager is a 'victim" to all who would prey on them, including your teachers, pornography, foul-mouthed individuals, or folks who express themselves with opposing ideas.
Becoming "a victim" isolates you from others, new concepts and innovative ideas. You remain ignorant of other societies because you're afraid to travel to foreign lands. You remain isolated from others who think differently, and you are intellectually, and spiritually, the poorer for it.
and afraid they are - more than people in any other country.
I remember flying to NY from LA once and there was som eturbulence - nothing major probably 20 seconds or so. Most people started either crying or saying GOD, Jesus!!
I was sitting next to a couple of Chinese students and we just looked at each other in shock (i.e. why are these people around us such pussies)
The same thing happened to me a year or so later flying from Serbia to Paris. There was a baby siting very close to me - an deven that baby did not cry - let alone the grown ups.
The biggiest problem we have in the US is nothing to do with Marxism (which I don't really care about) - it's to do with lack of balls and fear.
And no wonder there is so much fear - it's the founding principle of both RELIGION and MARKETING - the main driving forces here.
I read in a book (Brandwashed) that spreading panoramic fear is the main function of billions spent on marketing - once everyone is sufficiently scared they become impulsive and buy more crap they don't need
Curious to know how outspoken this guy was BEFORE he received tenure.
" How does Marx, 1800’s way of thinking, have anything to do with an US 21 century classroom?"
I agree - I come from a socialist Marxist country (Yugoslavia) and never heard of political correctess and other crap the author describes while I was living there. The first time I heard about that concept was when I moved to the USSA
I think I woudl need some time to explain to people in Eastern Europe what that concept means and I am sure they wudlbe asking me why they should not say what they think and why woudl they need to pretend they like things/poeple they don't. Or worry about other people's unreasonably fragile feelings etc
In my experience the strange concepts described above are a pure American innovation - nothing to do with Marxism I think (I studied it in Eastern European high schools/university and have never seen any of the items from the article promoted or associalted with marxism)
I must say I agree!!!! Keep your powder dry and lock and load.
Ghost, before you become a ghost, it b worth your while to reconsider the firing cycle of your weapon. Just sayin'
Someone's in the closet ;)
Thats where I keep the guns dontcha know
He teaches Criminology. A very politically correct industry to enter for sure. You Sir sound like a perfect candidate to enter the ranks!
How'bout this minority that ruined the country way before the politically correct ones came along. The minority no one in the media dares talk about and How that minority of Ashkenazi Jews Conquered the West => http://wp.me/p4OZ4v-2mp
Personally, I'd take living in Cuba over moving to the US any day.
May God grant you your wish, and soon.
Unlikely. There is no God.
Que se vaya rapido puta de communista pendeja
Cuba's communist dictator, Raul Castro, told reporters he is so impressed by what the pope does and says that he might start praying and could even return to the church.
http://ncronline.org/news/vatican/raul-castro-says-pope-francis-so-impre...
Interesting enough, the photo you are using is from a 2013 story about Pakistan and India. Thanks for the comments Muhammad(AKA baghdad bob).
America still seems better than Cuba (at least that was my impression about 10 years ago when I went there) but we are getting more and more similar by the day. They have better social connectedness and more friends in Cuba I think
I am not as eloquent as Dr Ben Carson when putting these damn liars vermin down. I prefer to shit in thier fucking communist facilitating faces.
Q: How many progressive liberal democraps does it take to change a light bulb?
A: That's not funny and you're a racist.
As we say: "How many Prescott College students does it take to change a light bulb?"
They don't change it, they form a support group to deal with the darkness in their lives.
How many queens does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
A: ONE, and the whole world revolves around her.
neato
These crybabies are just that..delicate flowers. FU wimps!!
The agenda is clear!
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2015/11/666-is-upon-us-the-...
WEE-oO! WE-oO! WE-oO! Check your privilege Bro!
Well, here is one professor that will surely face censure and ouster for his non-conformist slant on reality from a liberal progressive point of view...
That was too offensive......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xw2MjRcVO4g
Tom Waits - Way Down in the Hole
Seriously hope the La Raza douches get bounced out of SNL tonight if they disrupt the proceedings.
La Raza...that's racist!
agreed.
A standing ovation for Mr. Mike Adams. He deserves to be immediately inducted into the free speech Hall of Fame. Those students need to spend some time here at the Hedge, so that they can be truly "offended" by what is said here daily...
Oh spare us the patronizing speech and sit down. Mike Adams needs to come out of the closet and put his dick in another man's ass like a real man. Enough with the innuendo.
A broad sheet the equal of Thomas Paine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Sense_%28pamphlet%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Paine
Good for him. About f'ing time someone in academia stood up to the spineless pussies that permeate that segment.
We have room for this guy in our universities here in Aussie Land. One of the most politically correct (fucked up)
nations on the planet. Professor, I beg you, please come and help us.
Ditto for the commie collectivist paradise known as Canaduh!
It's unclear in this article who is speaking/typing what...
But more importantly,
there appears to be a mishmash of thought that is incapable of differentiating shallow and entitled thinking of too-many-melded-younger from shallow and entitled Controllers who are primarily responsible for creating the landscape in the first place.
Ah, what a mess...
So back to Principle and Law then, shall We?
Wow, I don't understandthose disses...
The fact that you are offended means you are weak and insecure.
tru that
r
When I met my first feminist I knew something was very wrong with the person and the movement. They were just waiting for someone to say something non-PC so they could be a total psycho and start screaming, hollering and calling the person names.
Makes sense, this is cultural marxism, no wonder they are intent on self destruction. Yuri Bezmenov warned years ago that this was taking place in the US, and that the useful idiots (feminists, LGTB, PC, social justice) were orchestrating ideologic subversion to destroy the US.
Shut the fuck up bitch usually works for me.
It works because they are used to men skulking like cowards. A "shut the fuck up bitch" more often than not will get you laid.
Should just play along until you can give her a 50 pointer. One time. Then never see her again.
Those feminists were mostly Jewish, ya know. They escaped into a personal protest against rigid expectations by cessation of shaving body hair, wearing Birkenstock shows, long flowery skirts and low cut tops. Smoked a lot of grass and fell in love with white guys who broke their hearts. They never seemed to work but always had money to go to deadhead concerts.
Ooo. An Amercan speaks for free speach. That offends the rent a mob, soros morons.
I expect and pay for tutors to defend timeless values, not political claptrap, the AshkeNAI new Bolsheviks and their hate which would make Gaza of the whole world if they the self appointed 'chosen ones' could get away with their new feudalism in my country. My country since 1620.
When I was paying my own way through college working as a paramedic in a hospital, I nearly got downsized when the economy crashed nearly a decade ago because "I was a young white male". I had the highest employee score in my department, but due to my age, racial heritage, and gender I was nearly fired becuase my manager figured..."Eh, he's a young white male. He'll be fine."
True story.
Young white Jewish males -or sons of elitist protestants -yes they will do fine-because their families own everything -but they never get laid off anyway -even when they are grossly incompetent. In fact, they get promoted. The rest of us white males pay the price for all this bullshit.
And women have additional advantages -they are fucking their way to propsperity and social advantage- thanks to the jews and other elites who fuck and promote them to keep the rest of the competition at bay:
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/sugar-babies-a-rising-number-of-college-s...
You are welcome
not necessarily - I've seen a few members of some of US's richest families overdosing and dying like junkies. And their parents didn't seem to give a shit. That's the problem with very unequally distirbuted wealth - the ones we expect to save the world and the economy end up being a bunch of retarded rentier with nothing to contribute to the society or even their own families if they have them.
And I've had insider view of sickness and dirt (billions notwithstanding) I can't even mention here.
Moral of the story if money is all you have you are quite useless and so is your family and they won'teven know how to help you(assuming you are on talkig terms)
Methinks the Professor doth protest too much and has serious issues with protecting his "manhood". Men are not "meant" to be dangerous beings, they ARE dangerous. Since at least the beginning of recorded "his"tory alpha males have been at the forefront of violent domination not only of others, but of the very planet.
Take a look around at what the so-called "progress" he so proudly proclaims on behalf of "men" has brought humanity.
BS. People like you come to my country and defy the Constitution and Bill of Rights which protects you after you fled from countries you ruined.
USA is a young country, but not so dim to believe your sort, Talmudist, dual citizen, traitor.
I'll go a bit further and say that any male claiming to be a "man" that has severe issues about what someone else is wearing is nothing but a weak f@ck.
I'll go a bit further and say that any male claiming to be a "man" that has severe issues about what someone else is wearing is nothing but a weak f@ck.
But can't you just see Caitlyn out for lunch with the girls as he leans in and says, "Can you believe what she's wearing? Doesn't she realize those horizontal stripes make her look like a cow?"
Caitlyn is a beatiful woman and a hero.
with a nice dick
She's stunning! I see you're PC too bro!
gender identity disorders can be tough
Why not just spell the word "fuck" out?
Awww...I think your burka is kinda cute in a forbidden fruit kinda way.
Ok, switch off your computer, cell phone, don't drive a car or take an airplane. Don't take an aspirine or (if you are a woman) take the contraceptive pill. Etc. etc. All things invented by men. European and American men. But if you say that then you are a racist and a male supremacist.
We live in a dangerous world. Always has been. And while humans did a lot of wrong to eachother and to the world and caused a lot of damage to it, we lead longer, healthier and happier lives than any point in history. But we need to get rid of psychotic 'alpha males' in politics, religion and economics. But these are not the ones that invented all the stuff I mentioned.
we need to get rid of psychotic 'alpha males' in politics,
Albright and H. Clinton?
V. Nuland.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Nuland
Heinz-Kerry Spouse
https://www.google.com/search?q=john+kerry+pictures&biw=1274&bih=640&tbm...
In my book, there is only one "man" test, and that is what you do when somebody gets in your face, or in the faces of your friends. You punch back. Twice as hard, as Breitbart says. As a reflex, without thinking, and all in. That's all. Feminine men and almost every woman will never go there, ever. They think about it, they complain, they whine, they cry, they huff and puff, but they never, ever go all in.
"Since at least the beginning of recorded "his"tory alpha males have been at the forefront of violent domination not only of others, but of the very planet."
Don't assume there weren't a lot of psychopath women around and behind those psychopath men.
"Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter."- Isaiah 5:20
Obviously a reference to the synsepalum dulcificum berry.
Must watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX3EZCVj2XA
Very interesting. This explains the current MSN and our politicians.
Google this guy, he has a long history.
I like him, but the powers at his school clearly have the long knives out for him. The minute he says something that isn't protected by his tenure, they will be on him for the kill. I hope he keeps on with the good fight, but does it in a way that they can't nail him.
Bullshit!
Marxism is about economic justice and NOT about social justice. That is the problem with America, they let you have gay rights but they kill you if you want to join the union.
Marx was a failed journalist, a drunk who couldn't help his own family, and then came along a Sugar Daddy Rothschld (Bauer) to pay him to write something to excuse corporatists, cronies.
Job done.
Here is the last Commander in Chief's words before he was assassinated by zionists:
"You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx.
We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and managing editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the "lousiest petty bourgeois cheating."
But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the cold war.
If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper man.
I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight "The President and the Press." Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded "The President Versus the Press." But those are not my sentiments tonight."
Go to youtube and hear how our Jack Kennedy urged the Press to speak truth to power, be the 'recorder of man's deeds'...before he was killed by zionists who now boast about using the USA for their Project for a New American Century, their Wolfowitz Doctrine, Zionist terrorism, permanent war.
I see the Nazionists down vote, all for their lies, wars, and their illegal nuclear weapons which our Jack defied.
Zionists: you are enemies of the American people and the world.
You killed hundreds of millions by your Red Terror in Russia, your marxiism, your stalinism, your socialism, your communism.
Yet you claim to be victims...like a thief tells the court it is not to blame.
His kids starved too from him being caught up in writing theory. Engels was his sugar daddy too.
The AshkeNAZI never admit their fault, yet ask everyone else to pay for them, excuse them, buy their wars. Are they criminally insane?
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the last true Commander in Chief, defied Israel's nuclear weapon request, and wanted to end the Fed and its usurious fake money.
100 thumbs up, your comment should be burned into the forhead of every American, they killed JFK and WE LET THEM! We swallowed their lies, just like we are doing with 9/11. When you control the media, you control imformation.
Our children die in their wars, while we borrow money from them, that is ours in the first place.
Americans are suckers, we accept many lies, as we wallow in our ignorance.
Thank you, true to our people. We must resist the foreign money changers, warmongers, even if modern politicans bow down to them in their ignorance, cowardice or corruption. This is our country, not theirs.
Funny how those who vote you down, don't have the courage of their convictions to state why...
I know who they are, and they fear that.
People like you and me need not fear their Hollyweird ISIS, their Zionist claptrap; lies.
Did anyone else catch Rubio making reference to a "new american century" on cnbc debate?
they kill you if you want to join the union.
And the union tries to kill you if you take a job that they refuse to do.
I have no problem with someone joining a union as long as the union does not join my business.
Not a bad turn of phrase, Pilgrim.
I am deeply offended and I am going to go play with the legos and playdough in the safe room.
Let's get this straight. Readng all classic works of literature suits some, not all.
Some people are best suited to propaganda.
Idiots like Big Brother, Big Sister.
They are the mob. Best stay clear of them or have the courage to defy them.
1oz Silver American Eagles €12 @ EurGold
https://www.eurgold.eu/silver/silver-coins/american-eagle-1oz-silver-coi...
This guy is begging for a hermaphrodite child.
XXY