This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Methods For Fighting Back Against Collectivist Tyranny
Submitted by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,
In any examination of historical precedence, it is easy to see that the sheer number of collectivist and tyrannical systems have far outweighed any experiments in individual liberty. I have explored the reasons for this in numerous articles, including recent pieces such as “How To Stamp Out Cultural Marxism In A Single Generation” and “The Tools Collectivists Use To Gain Power.” To summarize, there is a driving desire among weaker-minded people to seek control over other people in the name of arbitrary standards of safety as well as arbitrary standards of “civil” conformity. While such people proclaim publicly that they do what they do for the “greater good,” in reality they seek only to satiate a private lust for power.
In the darkest corners of their souls, many people have personal aspirations to attain godhood in their own little worlds. And if they cannot achieve such godhood outright on their own, then they will join a mob with similar aspirations so that they can at least feel omnipotent through vicarious tyranny.
This is why collectivism and individualism are mutually exclusive. A collectivist uses force or manipulation to compel the masses to accept a society that follows his personal ideology. An individualist adheres only to the tenets of natural law and the non-aggression principle. He believes force is justified only when the personal liberties of an individual are threatened by others. And he demands that if he participates in any society, it be voluntary. Collectivism is society through coercion. Individualism promotes society through voluntary cooperation. The two philosophies cannot coexist.
I'll say it again because there are some people out there with severe reading comprehension issues; the definition of collectivism requires the prioritization of the group over the rights of the individual. Collectivism by its very nature denies or destroys individualism and individual choice in this prioritization. Collectivism therefore requires the engineered organization of individuals predicated by COERCION, or force. Period. If a group organizes voluntarily, then it is NOT collectivist. If a group is organized through force and manipulation, then it IS collectivist. Period. Bananas are yellow. Oranges are orange. The sky is blue. Two plus two equals four. And, collectivism compels participation by force, while voluntary community does not.
There is no rational debate to be made against this clear dichotomy. It is truly amazing how some folks cannot seem to grasp the very obvious difference between collectivism and voluntary community; the same people that will likely still attempt to argue that collectivism and individualism are "not mutually exclusive" after reading this very article.
I certainly would never make the claim that most collectivists are intelligent...
The collectivist threat is not merely due to environmental factors alone. As the psychologist Carl Jung outlined in his collected papers titled “The Undiscovered Self,” at any given point in history at least 10% of the human population has inherent (but often latent) psychopathic tendencies. Less than 1% of these people will actually act out their full psychopathy under stable social conditions. However, in times of great distress or political and economic upheaval, the psychopathic 10% are given a kind of playground in which to let the devil out; Jung called this the “collective shadow.”
As I have explained in the past, these are the “useful idiots” within any society. They are the reason why there will never be a time now or in the future in which collectivist oppression will not be a potential threat, and why individualists will have to remain forever on guard. That said, they are only a part of the bigger problem. In almost every instance of mass tragedy or despotic government, an elitist minority pulls the strings of the useful idiots, aiming them like a shotgun at individualists in order to clear a path for total centralization. The elites are another horror altogether.
These are the men and women who EMBRACE their psychopathy. It is not latent or subconscious; it is a fully integrated and accepted part of their psychological life. They have found that psychopathy can be an effective tool for gaining power and influence when average people around them are less vigilant or less confrontational due to fear or apathy. And contrary to popular belief, psychopaths CONSTANTLY organize into effective working groups, some of them vast and global in scope, as long as there is the promise of mutual benefit involved.
This is not to say that they organize around “gain” alone. Elitists have their own pervasive ideology and their own rationalizations for seeking control of others.
They see themselves as “philosopher kings” as described in Plato’s 'Republic,' exemplary and “special” people who are born with the inherent genetic capacity to rule over the masses with the utmost clarity. They believe they know what is best not only for you, but for the human experiment in total. Their goal is to construct a sociopolitical apparatus that will allow them to have complete overreaching influence over every aspect of every individual life, up to and including the erasure of that life if they think it serves their ends.
"...You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner…” — George Bernard Shaw, Fabian socialist, from 'The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism'
"My conclusion is that a scientific society can be stable given certain conditions. The first of these is a single government of the whole world, possessing a monopoly of armed force and therefore able to enforce peace. The second condition is a general diffusion of prosperity, so that there is no occasion for envy of one part of the world by another. The third condition (which supposes the second fulfilled) is a low birth rate everywhere, so that the population of the world becomes stationary, or nearly so. The fourth condition is the provision for individual initiative both in work and in play, and the greatest diffusion of power compatible with maintaining the necessary political and economic framework.” — Bertrand Russell, member of the Fabian Society, from 'The Impact Of Science On Society'(Note: Russell believed that individuals should be given at least the illusion of choice within minor aspects of society in order to maintain their willing participation.)
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. … [I]t remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons… It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.” — Edward Bernays, father of modern propaganda, from 'Propaganda'
Elitists are rarely as open about their true intentions as the men quoted above. They often entice the public with fantastical promises if collectivist systems are supported, including: equality of wealth and prosperity; reduction of labor and increases in leisure time; incredible technological advances; universal education; universal healthcare; the end of nationalism, resulting in the end of war, resulting in infinite global peace; etc.
When they are not able to sell the public on a particular aspect of collectivism, they will create artificial divisions and artificial crises in order to engineer chaos. As per the Hegelian dialectic, when we are thoroughly tenderized by fear and disaster, the elites return to the scene with a “solution” to their original crime, a solution that usually involves more collectivism.
So how do individualists fight back against collectivism, elitists and the useful idiots they exploit? Here are some practical strategies that anyone can employ in his daily life.
Stop Participating In False Paradigms
Yes, in the everyday world there are leftists and right wingers, liberals and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats. People subscribe to particular ideologies and philosophies backed by fundamental differences in belief. These divisions between regular people are indeed real. However, it is important to realize that at the gatekeeper level in these systems, the leadership in both parties subscribe to the same goals. They are not divided. They are part of the elitist structure. And while their rhetoric differs cosmetically, in policy and in action they will always work to destroy individual liberty and promote collectivism, whether they claim to be on the right or the left.
This reality also applies to supposed conflicts between nations. If two nations appear to be at odds with each other, yet the leadership of each nation remains in league with the same international elitists (bankers, Fabians, globalists, etc.), then their conflict is a sham designed as theater for the masses.
Refuse to participate in false paradigms. Point out the inconsistencies of BOTH parties or sides and identify how each works against individualism and toward collectivism. Do not affiliate with any group or institution that has a demonstrated history of antagonism towards individual freedom or that partners with known collectivist (globalist) organizations and frontmen. If you are going to fight for any side, make sure it truly represents liberty through its actions and associations. Rhetoric is meaningless.
Decouple From Dependency On Corrupt Systems
As our economic situation becomes more and more dire, people are much more apt to become dependent on the system for survival, and this is an intentional result. I would not expect, for example, that the 94 million people in the U.S. who have been unemployed for so long they are no longer counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics should refrain from government aid or cut themselves off from welfare measures and become immediately self-reliant. They should, however, consider working toward that goal over time; and so should everyone else.
This is not quite as impossible as it seems. Can you produce or repair items that act as survival necessities? Can you teach a necessary skill? If so, then you are already well on your way to independence. Once you have a necessary skill, trade is possible outside the controlled economic framework. The more individuals involved in an alternative economy, the more diversity of skill sets will be available and the more prosperous that voluntary community will become.
The ultimate achievement in my view would be similar in aspects to the American agrarian models of the past with the integration of helpful technology: completely voluntary communities in which free trade is the foundation; the existence of grid water and grid power is unnecessary; food production is local and ample rather than reliant on national or international freight systems and the artificial scarcity of corporate farming models; and security is provided by each individual for himself, as well as for the community, through voluntary neighborhood watches or militias.
All of this starts with each individual taking action to become a producer, rather than a wage slave or welfare slave.
Organize Locally With People Of Like Mind
Again, organizing voluntarily is counter to collectivism. Collectivist systems cannot be defeated unless you are willing to establish a competing model that works better while maintaining freedom. This is not hard to do, considering collectivist models are failure-driven machines that devour people and use them as fuel to move society as a whole towards a “greater good” which is neither great nor good.
As outlined above, independent localism is the answer. It is a voluntary structure that encourages self-reliance and preparedness, while making production and innovation the mainstays of a healthy society. It rewards personal success and achievement, rather than punishing it. And, it helps a larger percentage of wealth to keep cycling locally, rather than being siphoned out of communities by governments or government-chartered and protected corporations.
Localism always starts small, with families, friends and neighbors. But as your organization continues to make life better for those involved, it will inevitably attract more participants. The redundancy of localized economies would also protect people from economic collapse. In fact, without the forced interdependency of centralized collectivist economic models, large scale financial crises would probably become a thing of the past.
Educate Children Privately
I’ve been saying it a lot lately, and I’ll say it again: Public schooling as it stands today is an apparatus for brainwashing, nothing more. With the dismal world ranking of U.S. students in math, science and reading, I hardly see what service public education is actually performing in America. The only service public schools do seem to excel at is indoctrination, with children now being immersed in collectivist lessons through Common Core and being conditioned into pacifism and fear through insane zero-tolerance policies.
The only working solutions available for parents today are to decouple from the federally dominated public school system and place their children in a well-vetted private school or to home-school. Any sacrifice, financial or otherwise, is worth it to save American children from a vicious system of propaganda and conditioning that could conceivably suppress their individualism and warp them into collectivist monsters.
Arm And Train For Self-Defense
I think it should be pretty obvious that there is a simple reason behind the collectivist habit of attempting to disarm common people: Armed people are harder to manage or control. If an armed population was not a threat to collectivists then they would not keep trying to disarm everyone. Therefore, if you are not armed and trained in self-defense, then you are not a threat to collectivists.
You can be the most brilliant of thinkers with pristine logic and truth on your side; but without the means and ability to destroy an attacker or tyrant, you are nothing in the grand scheme. Intellectual warriors are not really warriors. And as a writer, I will say in all honesty that the threat of the pen is not mightier than the threat of the sword.
Keep in mind, though, that it is not enough to merely purchase a firearm or shoot at the range. Team tactics and training are essential for free people, which is why they are so admonished by collectivist elements in our society. Train with friends and family or with your Community Preparedness Team, as I do through Oath Keepers; but learn tactical methodologies and how to fight with others. Present a viable danger to collectivists, or be subsumed by them.
Remove The Elitist Hierarchy
Eventually, the fight between individualism and collectivism will become physical rather than informational. There is no way around it. The more individuals begin to decouple from the corrupt system and construct their own alternative framework, the more violent collectivists will turn in response. The virtue of self-defense requires that tyrants be cut off from their means to project violence onto others.
While it is impossible to stop the inherent nature of psychopathy other than to participate in communities where psychopaths are not welcome or encouraged, there is the matter of organized elitism to deal with.
Any fight for freedom from collectivists will require the removal of command and control. This is the only way that humanity can be given breathing room to rebuild without remaining under constant preplanned threat. There are, in fact, many organizations that openly work toward collectivist oligarchy, from central banks (this means central bankers in ALL nations, not just in the West), to the Council On Foreign Relations, to Tavistock, to the Rand Corporation, to the International Monetary Fund or the Bank for International Settlements, to Bilderberg, to the Fabian Society, etc. These institutions need to be dismantled by any means necessary and the participants removed from positions of control. Make no mistake; it will take a war before such people give up the reins of power. This is the inevitable cost of individualism and the inevitable cost of freedom.
»
- 804 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
It´s so ironical how this site blames for everything the only "system" that could save them from the psychos and sociopaths that rule this world for the last 2-3 hundered years.
Divide and rule.
If you look at history, it is amazing how it rhymes.
It took a good 50-60 years for the Civil War to break out in massive violence.
People argued and fought and compromised for the first 40 or so years when they realized that negotiation was not going to solve the problem.
Then the violence started and kept escalating. It is funny that here once again we are faced with such violence beginning and escalating. What is ironic and rhyming is the fact that once again it has started in the Mid-West. We have the beginnings of a Bloody Kansas on our doorstep once again.The potential was there in the 60's with the violence that erupted from Vietnam and race but at that time we did not have the corruption and croynism that is so pervasive and at such levels as you have today in our federal government. Today we have constant wars, and serious race issues, and a corrupt government being run by the inmates.
From the looks of the type of violence being propogated it has a bit more time to perculate until it turns into outright hostilities. Of course, this can be helped along greatly by our wonderful banks and financial system going belly up even worse than the Great Depression. They are already bankrupt and everyone in charge knows it. So when the ponzi scheme finally goes south serious violence will begin.
This is the same guy that agitates that low and poor people should not be allowed to vote!
What he writes is not different than what RAND and AEI(AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY INSTITUTE), economic right-wing economic think tanks would advocate: the agenda is to brainwash the public into allowing the elites to keep all their wealth(which was primarily amassed by financial and legalistic means) during the next economic crisis. Bail-ins at the expense of middle class and taxation of the low classes are advanced while TAX CUTS and protection of wealth in trust funds and foundations for the elites is religiously preached.
He uses collectivism as a pejorative because he sees in it only in economic terms; that's it's evil collectivism when groups organize and work for mutual benefit and distribution of income. But this is anathema to elites, they want individuals to work for them without any collective support as then they can be easily exploited, coerced with and hoovered.
Your comment makes it look like you did not read or understand the article.
I am responding to what 'really' drives agenda of guys like him.
What he says is to arm and organize yourself and like minded individuals to attack collectivists ie those who otherwise would attempt to divide whats left over after next financial crisis for benefit of the greater society. And elites with their wealth are at the top of the food chain!
Yes I'm convinced this guy works for the 1%. He uses right-wing sneer words that get neo-libertarian idiots frothing at the mouth and then goes on to defend what he calls the, "producers," which are really just the legal owners of land and the means of production.
I've seen him delete dozens of comments on alt-market.com when somebody calls him on his bullshit.
If you want to use force telling me what I can and cannot ingest in my body then I have the right to pull out a gun and shoot you!
There are a many different ways to express your opinion. For me, it is Harleys, guns/ammo and gold and silver coins/bars. Only one do I take out in public. God Damned it listen you fools. Never piss off a patient man. These people who seek to control us are sick in the head. All these politicians do is make everything worse for everyone with neverending legislation. I have an idea...How about DE-LEGISLATION? WHat if we spent some time looking at old laws that don't make any sense and perhaps repeal some of those arcane laws. That is all I am asking. NO, we have to have MOAR and MOAR laws that only apply to the common man and we should start another war somewhere.
I don't know what to do about it. I know that I want to fight these pricks and I know that I can't do it alone. If you go out there alone you will get your ass kicked. If I was a Millennial I would not be happy. I am GenX and not that happy. These people in power can't stop filling their faces and pockets. I wonder about my children because they will be the generation AFTER the Millennials. Holy fucking shit! Is this mess what I am going to leave to my children. I can't do that and it drives me batshit crazy.
I have plenty of guns but I might have a better way. I have a ten year old daughter that I have taught to tell anyone who messes with her to fuck off. That seems to be these megalomaniacs goal: Get to the children and indoctrinate. Well, how about FUCK YOU and leave my kids alone? Leave those kids alone. I am still learning about parenting but I think I am doing OK so far.
One of the best things you can do is unleash your children upon these assholes. My daughter will give them hell and already does yet gets straight A's in school and speaks two languages. My four year old son....well, I am not sure but all indications are that he will get into some fist fights in the future. OK. Fight then.
Peace
'
'
'
I hear you!
Fellow early Gen X'er.
We've lost the war and battle because it wasn't about guns, it was about culture.
We lost because the filthy-leftist-liberal-progressives took over the mythology, the music, the television, the movies.
Think Star Trek TOS vs TNG vs Voyager.
We've got to bring the culture back to our side or we will never win.
We need to tell our stories.
Or, we just say, "Fuck it." and wait until these young skulls full of cultural marxist horseshit, learn all the lessons all over again.
I'm starting to side with the latter, sadly.
•?•
V-V
The problem today is that the sheeple, or useful idiots, make up the majority of our society. It only takes a thimbleful of force to make them fall into line. They don't want to rock the boat and love to be on the winning side, regardless of what that side represents. We're doomed, there's no turning back.
Collectivism: the practice or principle of a group priority (political elites) over each individual (citizen) in it. Sounds like Representative Democracy to me. You have self-serving corrupt liars doing what that want counter to the wants and needs of the people who elected them. A Direct Democracy is the only way out of this mess.
"If a group organizes voluntarily, then it is NOT collectivist. If a group is organized through force and manipulation, then it IS collectivist. Period."
You're full of shit. Can't make a point with the real definition of a word? Why not change it, right?
See you're right about the existence of many problems and you point many of them out.
But the cause you attribute it to is bullshit. Pure bullshit.
It can't be fixed by individualism. It can't be fixed by getting rid of, "collectivists."
The system is too big to be functional and respectful. That is the root cause. Too much growth.
But keep blaming the boogey men that haunt your imagination. It is popular yet poorly written fiction.
To summarize, there is a driving desire among weaker-minded people to seek control over other people in the name of arbitrary standards of safety as well as arbitrary standards of “civil” conformity. While such people proclaim publicly that they do what they do for the “greater good,” in reality they seek only to satiate a private lust for power.
Spot on!! After reading the authors "list" its apparent that most of the items are being systematically removed from being able to accomplish.
"They see themselves as “philosopher kings” as described in Plato’s 'Republic,' exemplary and “special” people who are born with the inherent genetic capacity to rule over the masses with the utmost clarity. They believe they know what is best not only for you, but for the human experiment in total. Their goal is to construct a sociopolitical apparatus that will allow them to have complete overreaching influence over every aspect of every individual life, up to and including the erasure of that life if they think it serves their ends."--
This fits Al Gore, Hiterly KlinTawn, The Boy King Obama, Billy Gates, Mark Fuckyouberg, and so many others. Very nicely put!
"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one."
If you agree with this assertion, you are a collectivist. If you reject it, you are an individualist.
Either way, you might be a star trek fan.
The only needs that exist are the needs of the one. There is no such thing as "the collective". The "many" is just one plus one plus one plus...
All that exists are this one, that one, another one... and so forth.
It is AMAZING that people can't comprehend this!
A tree exists. If you have a tree here, a tree there, another tree there and so forth, what exists? Tree. Tree. Tree.
You can say "forest", but nothing exists except tree, tree, tree...
The supposed "forest" is only an abstraction, a mental-unit... not a bunch of wood.
How do we know that? Simple. Remove every tree. Now, where is the supposed "forest"? There IS NO FOREST, except in your head. However, each tree is a real, physical existent.
The tree is real. The collective is not. The so-called collective is simply a [very convenient] way for a brain to cope with the large number of real existents in the universe. But they are mental units (neural configurations) in your head, not external existents. But each individual tree is a real, external, physical existent.
Unfortunately, how consciousness works is never explained to humans, and all collectivists, including the predators-that-be, need their prey to be confused about how to operate their brains effectively. And so, they purposely train their prey to habituate completely defective mental processes to control them. Starting with the obscene malfunction described above... assuming collective mental units are the same as real, physical, individual existents in the real universe. Which is why humans are a failed species, and doomed.
Too few individualists are willing to risk their lives, savings or comfort to defeat the predators-that-be. Therefore, the more viable option is to evade the predators-that-be (as well as garden variety human predators).
In the short run, this means "get the hell outta dodge" and live a simple, self-sufficient life in some rural area. Most of the best places are in the southern hemisphere.
In the medium run, this means "get off this planet". This may become problematic if the predators-that-be prohibit regular folks from moving into outer space once it becomes practical. But... we shall see.
In the long run, I believe "space is the place" for individualism. I don't see any way the population of earth can be saved from collectivism. The predators-that-be have established their control over brainwashing (education and media) and intimidation (police-state) too thoroughly for any significant number of people to escape the matrix AND prepare to defend themselves. Plus, I have learned from experience that individualists have some almost unbelievable aversion to collaboration, which would be necessary to be effective in more than modest, small-scale ways.
I agree with your statement: ""get the hell outta dodge" and live a simple, self-sufficient life in some rural area." However great places to emigrate to are found in many places not often considered. West Virginia has great havens. Also, Japan has small somewhat isolated islands that are crying for young people to make communities here (if one is willing to learn a new language and is willing to live in a world without guns and drugs)
I agree, though individuals have widely varying tastes and tolerances. Thus some places & solutions might be great for some folks, but not others.
As I said elsewhere, three friends of mine are trying to establish rather luxurious self-sufficient digs in various locations.
One is in a very secluded and nearly inaccessible spot in NZ (well, easily accessible by water but not land vehicle). Though very private and secluded (and in a completely private sheltered bay), it isn't that far from a modest size city (30 minutes by motorboat).
Another more rural effort is located in south america. The friend calls this place "the most awesome oceanview [and oceanfront] location on the planet" (very close to ocean but high altitude). While I don't know for sure whether that's literally true, the location definitely is completely awesome and stunning.
And the third group is located within the USSA territories, but on a fairly large but very sparsely populated semi-tropical island (but on the relatively dry side with much less rainfall than elsewhere). The weather is warm all year long, with all-time low and high temperatures of 52F and 88F, and ocean temperatures that range from 75F to 83F during the year. Their spot is literally on a golden-white sand beach, so this place can't be beat. This is probably the best place within the USSA territories for a place that will remain safe and secure when the SHTF... for anyone who has some kind of mental block against leaving dodge altogether. This place already has a large luxurious natural-wood 4br 4ba 2car home on several beachfront acres, plus solar-panels, plus water collection/storage, plus fruit and nut trees, plus plenty of room for planting a garden.
Anyway, if anyone who is strongly liberty-oriented is interested in being a partner/collaborator in any of the above, contact me below and I'll put you in touch with the principles in the appropriate group.
In all three cases they prefer a 4-way partnership, and in all cases they already have 2 full partners with $300K~$400K each and looking for 2 more partners with similar savings (to avoid debt).
Incidentally, in at least two of these places they tentatively plan to operate an "executive B&B" to generate revenue. Based upon similar vacation rental property less than one mile away on a similar beach, revenue should be $100K to $150K per year (with total expenses only about 10% of that).
The same revenue opportunity might exist at the NZ property too (which also has a large and mostly self-sufficient luxurious home/batch/gardens/pier), but comparable examples are difficult to find.
So, luxurious self-sufficient living/bolthole... and a good revenue-generating investment too! I wish I had been able to form a collaboration to build my digs, but after years of trying I was not able to find partners/collaborators, so I gave up and did everything on my own. Though this turned out great, I almost vaporized my entire life savings in the process, which I would rather not have done. But... happy ending nonetheless, and I totally love where I live now.
I just love his "here's all you need to do or have happen to change things" list, every one of which is completely unobtainable with the world's IQ bell curve limited propagandized populous that in far too many instances is obviously incapable of the critical though process even if not hampered by low IQ or a highly limited, biased education.
How else has the current situation evolved (devolved) into what we have seen over and over again throughout human history. He makes the same huge mistake most of those who have come to understand the reality of the situation through self-education and analysis make - they consider their fellow man to be equally capable of such an epiphany even assuming they even make the effort to reach it, both assumptions being completely incorrect.
The vast majority are apathetic, totally uninformed or misinformed, with a one-sided and superficial "education," and, apparently, are incapable of the critical analysis of anything other than, perhaps, which smart phone to buy. So, do what you can to protect yourself and your own and screw the rest of these clueless idiots.
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” - George Carlin
Brandon, outstanding article.
I have a slightly different take on the pen and sword. Rather than one being mightier than the other, they actually serve different purposes which are mightier at different times. The sword is indeed mightier as a defense, but, when not being physically attacked, its use would become an act of aggression. On the other hand, our pen is our offense in this war of ideas in which your eloquence is so well deployed. As a weapon in the war of ideas, the pen can be wielded upon the collectivists at any time. But, when we are physically attacked, the sword must be strong and ready to defend our God given natural rights.
I also participate in the war daily with my pen and spoken words. After watching so many over the years either recoil in horror, or have their eyes glaze over, considerable effort has gone into boiling down my initial message into a concise and easily accepted statement. A few widely recognized words from the Declaration of Independence are used to break the ice. As a minimum, it effectively plants a seed of an idea that can easily grow and spread. More importantly, this message seems to better initiate a dialog about securing our most basic rights.
Beyond planting seeds of the idea with the first message, a more aggressive offense has also been developed. Its a slightly longer, yet, still simple message. Hopefully it will go viral among the growing numbers who've embraced the idea of individualism.
Maybe you and others will find the following two messages to be helpful when you wield the pen and spoken word in this war against all who want to rule over us.
*****Message 1 (planting the seed of an idea, and opening the door to discuss it):
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness... To SECURE these rights (not grant or limit them in any way), governments are instituted AMONG men (not over them). The instant that a government goes any further than to "secure these rights", it immediately violates them. It becomes an evil parasite, which, as history has always shown, will then want to grow until it consumes its host society. Government at the most local level, if even that, is all that's needed to "secure these rights" and is all that can exist without ultimately violating "these rights".
*****Message 2 (a strong offense for those who've already embraced the idea):
We must use our strongest offense to defeat the criminals who call themselves US government. A violent offense would play into the hands of our opponent, because so much of the wealth stolen from us has been spent on weapons for mass murder and destruction. However, we can all do something very simple to defeat those superior arms. All that's needed is for us to wield a few effective words, written and spoken as often as possible. They have the strength to weaken and destroy society's consent to be governed by the common enemy of all moral people. The truth is becoming obvious to most that there is something terribly wrong with this country. So, the conditions are ripe.
Our strongest offense is to share, as often as possible, how we feel about the liars, thieves and murderers who call themselves US government. The answer is really quite simple, but requires all of us to win the offensive. Any time you refer to the psychopaths and sociopaths who call themselves US government, insert whatever derogatory preface you prefer at the moment, as I've already had the opportunity to do three times in this short message. If enough of us include this in everything we say and write about the societal excrement who call themselves US government, then more will lose their reluctance and join us, allowing this offensive to go viral. In time, nearly everyone will constantly have this idea in the back of their mind. Then we can achieve a tidal wave of disrespect for the lying, stealing, counterfeiting, kidnapping, mass murdering monsters who call themselves US government. They and their entire institution will have lost all their legitimacy and support, in a revolution that didn't require a single shot to be fired in aggression. The next revolutionary steps of massive disobedience and resistance against all the unjust diktates and acts of aggression will become almost second nature. We will then have the numbers and means to win this war.
Join me in this peaceful revolution against the idea of allowing others to rule over you. Start at this moment to always use a derogatory preface whenever you speak or write about the parasites upon mankind who call themselves US government, the state, or any other level of centralized government. Together, we must win this war against the very idea of central government, so that our progeny may never be oppressed by them.
This is one of the best articles I've read on zerohedge and certainly the best from this author. I agree with almost every word. Anyone that doesn't see the tyrannical communist take over of western civilization is both blind and ignorant of history. Already you see the purges of white men from positions of power in government, academia, etc. It is only partly about race but more about communist agitation against the existing power structure, morality, and society. They murdered tens of millions of Chinese and other oriental bourgeoisie just the same as they murdered millions in Russia, Germany, and South Africa.
Of course Brandon cannot truly name the enemy as he would be assaulted and lose whatever halfway mainstream influence and audience he hopes to attract. But I have no such concerns. The "collectivists" as he calls them, or "globalists" as Alex Jones calls them are exactly who you would e left them to be if you know the history of the 20th century - communist Jews. The same ones that murdered over 100,000,000 people in various revolutions and purges. The same ones that tried, and failed, to conduct a communist take over of Germany prior to WW2. The same ones that then declared war on Germany and sent endless waves of Slavs from the Jewish Bolshevik Soviet Union to crush the only power on Earth that openly defied the Jews and their banking system.
Soviet communism was a long running jewish social experiment that was ultimately deemed a failure and abandoned. Now they push their perversions in the quasi-capitist West thru the mass media and schools to turn once free individuals into mindless PC communist drones. Just look at young americans today and their PC tyranny and total lack of humor. These little tyrants are ready to spill your blood because you said something they don't like. It is the reengineering of tbe Soviet union with a foundation of neofeudalism instead of socialism. Look at China if you want to see the type of society they are turning the west into. Officially communist but really just a tyranical neofeudal police state where the elites have more power than any capitalist billionaire could ever imagine.
And if they ever successfully take your guns I suggest you flee immediately because no gun confiscation in history has EVER resulted in anything other than mass murder of the disarmed people.