This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Context for Paris Terror Attack: U.S. and Its Allies C-R-E-A-T-E-D ISIS
We are horrified by the terror attack in Paris, and send our prayers and good wishes to the French people (we were just there on a wonderful family vacation).
Here’s the context that we dare the Western press to discuss: the U.S. and its allies CREATED ISIS. And see this.
On the other hand: The First Question to Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It a False Flag?
- advertisements -


Please elaborate if you can. What comments are disappearing?
We?
The old American M.O was to destroy the kingpins and/or financiers. Under US law: "18 USC 2 - Principals
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal."
Terrorism is defined under US Law: https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/terrorism/terrorism-definition
Thus all financiers of ISIS are Principals in the French terror attack. Who authorized through the US State Department the delivery of those Toyotas to ISIS? http://www.hangthebankers.com/isis-toyota-trucks-us-state-department/
I'll take "John McCain" for $200, Alex:
https://ixquick-proxy.com/do/spg/show_picture.pl?l=english&rais=1&oiu=ht...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/attack-in-france-state-sponsored-terror-but...
Attack in France = State Sponsored Terror, But Which State?
.
..."State Sponsorship – But Which State? Gladio Extra
As the refugee crisis expanded in Europe, it was warned that it would be purposefully manipulated to create maximum hysteria to justify more direct military intervention in the West’s losing proxy war in Syria.
In a previous report titled, “Can Pan-European Hysteria Save NATO’s Syrian War?,” it was warned that:
What is taking form is a controlled strategy of tension, where far-right groups are being arrayed against the migrants and their European supporters, to create hysteria and eventually violence that will be leveraged by those who orchestrated it.
Permissive immigration policies and self-imposed quotas ensured a virtual tidal wave of migrants coming into Europe, while long-cultivated racist and xenophobic political groups – holdovers from NATO’s notorious “Gladio” Cold War stay-behind networks – attempted to create backlash and hysteria in the streets regarding a migrant “invasion.”" ...
.
"ISIS is clearly state-sponsored, but not by any of the nations the West seeks to overthrow in the wake of terrorist attacks carried out on Western soil. Likely the terrorists who spilled blood on Parisian streets this week were armed, trained, and funded by the West itself and its own allies in the ongoing proxy war in Syria.
All that was left to complete the equation was an incredible act of galvanizing violence that would create the long-absent public support the West needed to justify further meddling in Syria – public support that the narratives of “helping freedom fighters,” recycled lies regarding “weapons of mass destruction,” and tales of “barrel bombs” failed to generate."...
.
In other words, it was an attack designed specifically to provoke French public opinion into supporting action.
The scale of the attack is that of a military operation. It would have required a large group of well trained militants, well armed and funded, with experience in planning and executing coordinated military operations, moving large amounts of weapons clandestinely, experts in the use of weapons and explosives, as well as possessing intelligence capabilities used to somehow circumvent France’s increasingly colossal surveillance capabilities.
Like the terrorists and their supply lines pouring out of NATO-territory into Syria itself, clearly with immense state sponsorship behind them, those involved in the most recent attacks in Paris are also clearly the recipients of state-sponsored funding and training.
While France will undoubtedly try to use this attack to justify further intervention in Syria to topple the government in Damascus, it was most likely France’s own allies in Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and even Paris itself who were directly or indirectly involved in the training, arming, and funding of those who spilled blood on Parisian streets this week.
The first and most important question in examining any great crime is “cui bono?” or to whose benefit? Attacking Paris, and in particular a football match full of nationalists already increasingly violent and hysterical seems to only benefit a government seeking further justification to wage wider war abroad – a war it is currently losing and a war it currently lacks wide public support to continue fighting.
It now, all so conveniently, has the support it was looking for."
ISIS was founded and funded by the US and its allies like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Israel, UK and France:
ISIS: The jihadist movement stamped “Made in America”
For three years, the US, along with the Gulf states and Turkey, poured billions into “opposition” groups, supposedly to unnamed “moderates,” but in reality to Al Qaeda-linked Sunni groups such as al-Nusra and ISIS to spearhead a sectarian war. The US, Turkey and Jordan have operated a base in Jordan where US instructors trained dozens of ISIS members. In an article last year, the New York Times confirmed that the CIA assisted Arab governments and Turkey by airlifting weaponry to these groups in Jordan and Turkey. The Guardian reported last March that British and French instructors were also involved.
Other ISIS members were trained near Incirlik Air Base near Adana, Turkey, where US forces are based. After completing their training, they went to Syria and later Iraq.
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/07/30/isis-j30.html
USA, Turkey and Israel Act As Air Force for ISIS
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/08/usa-turkey-and-israel-act-as-air-...
The US arming of ISIS
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/06/03/pers-j03.html
Poll shows 81 percent of Syrians believe US created ISIS
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/09/18/isis-s18.html
1 yr, 6,700 airstrikes & $4bn after Obama vowed to ‘destroy’ ISIS, jihadists still on offensive
http://investmentwatchblog.com/1yr-6700-airstrikes-4bn-after-obama-vowed...
My condolences to the families and friends of the 3 suicide bombers at the Stade de France. A total of 3 people were killed ( the 3 suicide bombers ). That's gross incompetence/stupidity.The families will have to live in shame with this forever.
Secondly , MSM states that the 8 terrewists were 'killed'; a technicality; that 7 of the 8 committed suicide and therefore we should in no way attribute this to the competence of the French special forces.
While i in no way condone the innocent loss of life, the French have blood, lots of it on their hands throughout the middle-east and Africa. No MSM sensationalist headlines appear stating the French special forces participation in these atrocities.
False Flag or not the French Government should be held accountable in the Hague for WAR CRIMES. The USSofA , Sodomy Arabia, Turkish and the UK Governments' alongside them.
With ALL of the above Training, Harboring and Arming these SCUM they should expect further blow-back for years to come.
Lastly, ( at the BataClan Festival ) Def Metal musik agitates me immensely and should not be available for public consumption; just on a personal note.
GW, I hope you enjoyed your family trip. I was there 8 years ago and there were Muslim enclaves in every city that "you just didn't go to". Many shops were owned by Muslims in the tourist areas and I noticed that they were not very friendly to the French or tourists. Europe is going to have a major problem with the Muslims, again.
I see that the false flaggers have come out in force. I disagree. Islam does not need any coaxing to kill infidels. That's what Islam does.
Sometimes, a false flag, isn't.
I agree, the event was real, but they probably knew about it and stood idly.
So much for George.
G.W.
I said this in an earlier post regarding the "event"...
Europe/NATO ain't in harmony on getting it on with Syria and Eastern Ukraine so they paid dearly with a contrived refugeee crisis that brought in very unsavory highly trained mercs and other essentials to make the event in Paris come off, which of course will happen elsewhere among the EU states if they have to should it not reach the internal stated goals of the "mission".
Now the slogans and platitudes dripping from the "Constitutional Attorney" in the oval office that will sound Roosevelt-esque with the "We have nothing to fear"... speech that questions our direction and committment that "we" have more to do in the "long war on global terror" and that sacrifices must be made like our grandfathers and great grandfathers in WWII if "we" are to succeed!...
This or perhaps I should say the official narrative willl be prominently displayed in that speech that talks about our cherished committment to our European partners that we liberated and freed from tyranny... and when that doesn't work ?...
Anyone Europeans struggling with the concept that their own governments would mass murder them needs to look into Operation Gladio. For Americans, there's a long list of such events, most notably, 9/11. Before that there was, Waco, Oklahoma City, Pearl Harbor, etc.
Dead simple. Nuke Mekka ( preferably during the hadj ). And if another act of muslim coordinated terrorism occurs, nuke another muslim city. Untill they stop. Takes at most 6 months, then they know.
Because the terrorists care about innocent lives, right?
Thats stupid. Nuke Riyadh...
the petro dollar and the future,
nuclear power and religion. man o man.
nuke the real culprits, nuke tel aviv
you may be onto something with that
reading of the writing on the wall?
i'm not in support of the idea but i
could see how such a thing could happen,
by hook or crook, one way or another.
if i was them i would be relocating to
new zealand or colorado, or something.
change my name and shit.
"Syrian president al-Assad also condemned the attack: "What France suffered from savage terror is what the Syrian people have been enduring for over five years.""
.
i won't forget or dismiss this either.
if we never nation built over threw lybia gov, iraq and syria..how could wall st make $$..war what is it good for..well NWO reptiles like it just fine.
What is the point of the surveillance carried out by the security services if they can't pick up on a planned attack such as this? Was it that they assisted the perpetrators in order to 1. Close the borders. 2. Set the scene for the G20 to keep everone on song. 3. Justify NATO attacks on Syria. 9/11 and Operation Gladio, in Italy in the 60's, show how much respect security services have for human life and the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior shows how much the French DGSE cares about such things.
ISIS rushs to claim responsibility for this and the Russian Airliner. If their goal was truely to establish a Muslim Caliphate why bring the wrath of the whole of the Eastern and Western worlds down on your own head?
@Flybyknight
" the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior shows how much the French DGSE cares about such things"
Concerning the Rainbow Warrior (1 accidentally death indeed - in 1985)
It was actually a fault of French military security service (DGSE), that France recognised.
Having admitted responsibility, France initially offered an official apology and acknowledgement of breach of international law.
Additionally, the UN secretary-general awarded New Zealand 7 million USD. This is in addition to compensation which France paid to the family of the only victim of the mission and to Greenpeace (settled privately).
France also offered a new boat to Greenpeace.
This is the real reason for all the shit going on in the world...take a few minutes and watch.
Remember, all wars are banker's wars.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL_3Qg-SADYBanksters own the MIC. Vice News is a Bankster redirect.
Sorry, no! An epileptic schizophrenic and his deluded followers for the last c. 1400 years have had it as their mission to kill off, terrorize, or at least oppress any other religion outside of Islam.
This or something similarly violent would be happening without any response from anyone.
Ausonius
Are you unfamiliar with the past 1400 years of "Christian" western imperialism, colonialism, and crusades?
Your certainty that the mayhem of the present has no cause also even
in the misdeeds of the recent past suggests an ignorance of recent history.
http://www.chris-floyd.com/Articles/2531-age-of-despair-reaping-the-whir...
Perhaps if you dropped the self-righteous hubris about US and western "innocence", reality would be clearer. Believe it or not, there is a connection to current events and the MIC, bankster frauds, war crimes, unsavory allies, expansionist aggression, and the creation of jihadist extremists.
rwe2late
Please watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I_To-cV94Bo
.
Believe it or not, the Crusades were a rational response to Islamic aggression against fellow Byzantine Christians! Alexius Comnenus asked the pope for a force to aid him against Islamic armies.
The First Crusade is what he got instead! The Crusades were a complex phenomenon, but among the motivations of the Crusaders - and yes some were looking to carve out their own kingdoms and grab land - was the defense of Christianity against aggresive Islam.
I am a medievalist: so, yes, I know my history, past and present. Crackpot conspiracy theories do not count as history.
I hope to see the Vatican sacked by ISIS in my lifetime. Europe is done. Lived in France for 2 years, never saw anything so pathetic as the French love for their culture above all else, even their survival. You could be a terrorist and as long as you speak french you are good to go. They brought this thing on themselves, and will be shocked at the result. Culturally, the germans are much different. They will rise up and real change will be made.
Stop ghosting/deleting comments or lose my patronage.
Thanks for the down votes. Love you too.
708 anniversary of the Paris black friday knights templar burnings of 1307.
Long wait for masonic revenge.
Must be a coincidence I guess /sarc.
If you don't think this was a set false flag operation then you need to stop huffing paint and get a fucking clue.
http://redefininggod.com/2015/11/globalist-agenda-watch-2015-update-87-t...
Derp, look a passport. Dat PROOVES it. Daaaah.
Let's say that France wanted to close its borders. It could not justify such because of a lot of strange people (Muslims and Africans) were drifting in — that would have been racist. So, a false flag action to make it really easy. It sounds really cynical and probably all wrong but I am trying to find a reason for unreasonably heinous acts.
Criminal probe, my ass. Every act is politicized into terrorist action so the greater powers could remove even more of our illusory freedoms. Pretty soon the only freedom we'll have left is whether we choose Coke or Pepsi.
Can you blame them for closing their borders?
See Greenhill's "Weapons of Mass Migration"
http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/11515/SI_V9_I1_2010_Greenh...
This gives all of Europe license to close borders. The immigrant influx was becoming untenable. ISIS knows this. Now you'll have thousands of Muslims camped at borders, straining local resources and littering. Neighborhood skinheads will beat up some of the campers for stealing chickens and it will be game on. ISIS wil have cadres of Muslims in a no-win situation. Some of them will be frustrated enough to strap on a bomb vest.
Reason not hard to find. Look at Hollande's reaction. France has to get fully on board with (Washington's) war on ISIS, boots on the ground where Russia no longer dares to bomb.
There are two choices here for heads of state: join the Crusade and the march to Armageddon, or tell the truth, the truth that GW has laid out here, and break ranks. Which requires confronting the power of the Empire with its legions of paid agents but the power of the MSM. So telling the truth and breaking ranks probably carries a political death sentence, maybe a real one. Unless ... unless that leader can rally the masses to follow his/her lead.
But where would they lead? The deeply-misinformed masses demand action, and if you remove "do nothing" from the table there are really only two sides now - US and the Empire or Russia and the Multi-polar alliance. And aligning with Russia makes you and your whole country a target.
So Russia's strategy of postponing as long as possible any military confrontation with the Empire, hoping that it will collapse and die without a world war,
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-06-18/putin-advisor-proposes-anti-dol...
has suffered a setback.
But there is still hope. Time is still on the side of the anti-Empire coalition. For example, a global financial collapse coupled with the collapse of the Arabian monarchies, leading to the US and allies using their last financial strength to invade Arabia to rescue their investments, could tie up the Empire, much as getting bogged down in Vietnam diverted the US from its plans for a world war in the 1960's.
>where Russia no longer dares to bomb.
From a purely logistics standpoint, you bomb the nearest targets first, then you move to targets that are further away. And for not daring to bomb I'd say that's nonsense after the Russians launched those missiles from the Caspian Sea. The US did move it's aircraft carrier out of harm's way after that occurred if you remember. IF the French are bombing Raqqa, it saves the Russians some work, nothing more, nothing less...
Standard Disclaimer: Long range bombing missions remind me of the Doolittle Raid. It's more of a mission to make a statement, not to inflict a lot of damage on the enemy simply because you don't have the numbers of aircraft to carry enough payload. The first bombings by the US in WWII didn't try to go all the way into the heart of Germany for a simple reason. You don't want to lose all your planes by flying over additional enemy territory.
The world was divided into two coalitions.
One of them - a coalition against terrorism, led by Russia.
The second - a coalition against Assad, led by the United States.
The world was divided into two coalitions.
One of them - a coalition against terrorism, led by Russia. WHITE HAND
The second - a coalition against Assad, led by the United States. BLACK HAND
https://www.cpaatlantic.ca/~/media/Site/Legacy/Round-1/Images/20527.jpg?...
Any questions?
In the past,
LePen has vilified NATO as "baby killers" and urged France quit NATO.
She was not a supporter of the invasion of Libya.
She also does not support the economic war against Russia.
If she now turns around and supports an invasion of Syria, that
will put her in the same camp of hypocrites as Obama, Hollande, Tsipras et al.
Reason: gets globalist stooge Marine Le Pen elected as she warned about it again and again.
Of course it was a false flag. The second this year.
This time, Hollande wants to make it easier to send French troops to die in Syria for the House of Saud, whose dumping of oil is the only thing keeping Euroland from complete economic collapse.
Hollande was at the Stade de France, perfectly situated to make a fine speech at the scene at a moment's notice. He knew everything in advance, same as with Charlie. Nobody who mattered was ever in real danger.
"All the assailants are dead" my ass. The ones who didn't blow themselves to bits are already in Switzerland, waiting for their flights to a peaceful, prosperous retirement in Dubai or Doha. The Charlie murderers, who are assuredly also alive and well, will be there to greet them, I'm sure.
http://sgtreport.com/2015/11/deep-state-paris-massacre-exposed/
again?
Hard to rule out an agent provocateur without actual research into events. Not something that can be done in our 5 minute news cycles. Time for actually criminal investigation. If that gets pre-empted then you may be right to be suspicious.
A criminal investigation, appointed by whom? Hague? Like the 9/11 report or the Warren Commission Report.
The instant iHolland called it an act of war I knew it was a "legal" pretext to invade Syria. Bombs away within hours.
A few things stand out, like that pristine passport allegedly from Syria. And CIA's little visit to France the day before, just about the time the inteligence grid failed, see Paul Craig Roberts report about that.
We don't need no stinkin' fake criminal investigation. It's easy to see and the major pieces have been revealed already.
To me, it is sufficient proof that the perpetrators supposedly said they were doing this "for Syria" (not only that, one of the "suicided" perps had a Syrian passport, how convenient) - if they had made this attack in Russia, or in Iran, or in Lebanon, that would make sense. Doing it in France makes no sense at all, as France has only been nibbling around the edges in Syria. France has not DONE anything in Syria. The point is to give France an excuse and a way to feign a united populace willing to "go to war with ISIS" which of course, *really* means protecting ISIS from the Russian/Iranian/Hezbullah onslaught.
Now, of course, France has the required "justification" they can give the French Sheeple for making the stupid move they are about to make.
For the Zionists who have clearly completely owned France ever since the false Charlie Hebdo attack, this is just perfect. Since one US nuclear power has shown cold feet in getting involved in Syria with "boots on the ground", they have manuevered a smaller nuclear power to do the same thing, believing that in so doing they can tamp down Russian efforts in Syria.
How fucking transparent can they get. Of course, the Sheeple throughout the West will tusk-tusk sway at the evil terrurists and swallow whatever evil jism the Satanic US/Zionist Deep State dishes up.
The chess game continues.
Putin needs to double down QUICK before the French troops get there - if they can take Raqqa, its GAME OVER for the neo-con plans in Syria. Note the importance of the Mosul Raqqa highway to ISIS... Note the location of Raqqa in the middle of Syria which gives a clear path for the Qatar pipeline (however dubious such a pipeline might be). Note the strategic position of Raqqa not far from the headwaters of the Euphrates...
Its not the tool but how its used. Who is using this tool? What are they using it for? On who?
My BS meter is pegged on every scale.
NATO now has the "moral authority" to launch a land invasion in Syria to "fight ISIS".
Yes, Hollande was quick to call it an act of war. And that pristine Syrian passport was deemed fake by the Paris police, who apparently didn't get the memo. Hey, wasn't an Egyptian passport found too? I guess they're next.