This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
One of the Paris Terrorists Was “WHITE, Clean-Shaven”
The Mirror reports on this eyewitness account:
“At about 9.30pm a new looking black Mercedes pulled up outside with dark tinted windows at the back and the passenger and driver windows down. I could clearly see the passenger’s face as he was not wearing a hat or mask.
“As soon as the car stopped he quietly opened the door and got out in front of the restaurant.
“That is when I saw he was holding a machine gun that was resting on his hip. I could not take in what I was witnessing.
“People outside spotted the shooter approaching with his gun and tried to run inside but he shot them down in the doorway.
“Then people inside moved forward to see what was happening and he sprayed more bullets into them. I was trying to catch them on my camera phone but the gunman saw the light on my mobile and I ducked down behind the wall as they fired at my hotel. The gunman calmly reloaded his weapon several times. He then shot up at the windows in the street to make sure nobody was filming anything or taking photographs. It lasted over six minutes
“He fired lots of bullets. He was white, clean shaven and had dark hair neatly trimmed. He was dressed all in black accept for a red scarf.
What do you think? False flag? Light-skinned, clean-shaven ISIS jihadis who went undercover to carry out the terrorist attack? Or local Europeans who were radicalized into jihad?
Postscript: The Mirror also notes that the terrorists looked like professional soldiers:
“I would describe him as tall, with dark hair and also quite muscular.
“They looked like soldiers or mercenaries and carried the whole thing out like a military operation.
Similarly, the Guardian carries an eyewitness account of one of the terrorists looking more like a professional soldier than an Islamic jihadi.
- advertisements -
Certainly you are healthy and nothing wrong with that, but to a psychiatrist doesn't hurt. Just just in case. Enjoy your treatment!
All 7 weeks and 6 days worth.
WB7,
I've followed your work for years and have a great deal of admiration for your talent. Me... I can't draw a stickman. I also felt bad for your loss earlier this year, but didn't feel appropriate commenting since it was very personal and we've never communicated. In short, I have a great deal of respect for you.
On this comment, however, I take exception. If we try to reduce people's comments based on the length of their membership we will be left with a bunch of "oldies" and no new thoughts will be welcomed -- be they agreeable or not. It would be nice if people didn't use length of membership as a badge of credibility, I think.
Thank you and you are most certainly welcome here,
but I respectfully disagree when it comes to obvious trolls. They show up like clockwork on ZH and need to be called out.
Geo Wash is the most consistent and constant troll posting at Zero Hedge.
He swallowed Sigsby Salt and never recovered.
Augustus is a big argument for the opinion that length of stay does not equate to quality trolling. He's been here 5 years and 4 months.
With equal respect, does time as a member identify a troll? Even more, don't trolls have the right to say their piece and be called out on their content rather than their time as a member?
I just think this place should be where people (including myself who is generally downvoted) should be free to voice their opinions. If they get their ass kicked on content, so be it.
Saying your piece and getting you ass kicked was what this place was all about. If we try to disuade people because they don't say things we think are appropriate, we become as destuctive as the major media forums we rail against for trying to control the narrative.
But, I'm getting too serious. I think I'll watch some hockey now. Go Pens!
Agreed, B_O. The quality of one's post has nothing to do with the duration of his ZH registry, as far as I can tell. Yomutti's posts are bad because they're based on bigotry and ignorance.
Just read your profile. We have different backgrounds but I couldn't agree more with your positions. Both on bigotry and ignorance. But, I hope ZH doesn't become the library at Dartmouth. After all, everone has value, even as a bad example.
And you're proud to have been posting from Daddy's basement for several years now?
Trust me dude, spending long periods of time here is not exactly a badge of honor.
Daddy is a dead Vet,
And this Daddy's kids are debtless and employed young adults.
Get the fuck off this site you troll moron.
Another news from the madhouse?
Wake up. It has nothing to do with race or skin color. It is ALL about being a member of the death cult hell bent on conquring, ensaving or killing the entire world called Islam.
Pretty impressive that you've already definitively concluded that all the 'attackers'/planners/terrorists are all ISIS and/or Islamic.
Not sure who would downvote that.
the death of the 19th-20th century socialist -welfare states on both sides of the Atlantic, will take less time than that of the Roman Empire-(arguably a century or two at least)
Hopefully they won't blow up the world in their angst tho
Le Petit Cambodge/Le Carillon
At around the same time, just over a kilometre further north, an unknown number of gunmen opened fire on a bar and popular Asian restaurant across the street from each other.
A witness who arrived on her scooter only minutes after the attack told Le Fiagaro : “There were people on the ground. I initially thought that a car had crashing into the restaurant because its window was smashed. I didn’t know what was going on.”
“There were so many bodies on the ground. I’d say, from memory, about forty. Four or five people were left, no more,” she said.
“But I didn’t see any blood. The fire fighters arrived very quickly, but it was very calm. That really struck me. ”
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2015/11/13/shootout-in-paris-restauran...
Ahahhahahah hhahahahaahah. "But i didn't see any blood."
Parce que, les gens sont réalisés en cire.
Three guys with AK-47s emptying multiple mags into a crowded concert hall for (by one victim's account from inside) twenty minutes. Now look at this picture taken right after the massacre and see if anything doesn't make sense. There are higher resolution versions out there. There were a hundred fatalities, but an additional couple of hundred with gunshot wounds. Does that look like a place that three hundred people got shot at close range with an AK? That's an amazingly bloodless killing floor for three hundred gunshot victims. The higher resolution versions seem to be missing something else - spent shell casings from what must have been several hundred rounds. Did ISIS have time to police up their brass?
The witness also said that the shooting was almost continuous for twenty minutes, then suddenly all stopped at once. The cops didn't start their entry until an hour later. I wonder if they really managed to get any of these guys from the club, or if they all got away in the chaos. Hard to believe they would just stop shooting for no reason and hang around for an hour doing nothing until the cops surrounded the place. And why so many drag marks? When did THAT happen if these guys were still hanging around inside waiting for the cops?
I see a lot of blood in that picture
I've had the misfortune of scraping up more than a few gunshot victims. I can only offer my opinion that that is NOT a lot of blood for that number of victims, and three guys with AK-47s would have done way more damage. I don't see what should be evidence of 100 fatalities and 200 injuries (or at least a good portion of them on the main floor). That's not suggesting anything one way or the other, just that the picture does not match the details we know so far. Maybe there's some other explanation - I'm just making an observation off of the only picture we have.
Paveway... these muttonheads don't have a clue what an AK-47 can do...
AK-47 vs. watermellon single shot > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLB36UxWD0M