This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
German Interior Minister Says Suicide Bomber's Syrian Passport "May Have Been Planted"
As we reported extensively over the weekend, the biggest false flag clue that has emerged so far from the Paris attack was the discovery of a fake, fully intact Syrian passport next to one of the suicide bombers. The question which we posed is who would benefit from this and whether the authorities would entertain such a "preposterous" suggestion.
It appears the answer is yes. Overnight none other than the German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere said that the "Syrian passport found next to a suicide bomber in the Paris terror attacks may have been planted."
Bloomberg adds that reports that the identity in the passport may have been registered in several countries along the so-called Balkan route raise the suspicion that it could be a deliberate attempt to implicate refugees and “make people feel unsafe,” de Maiziere said.
“There are indications that this was a planted lead, but it still can’t be ruled out that this was indeed an IS terrorist posing as a refugee,” he told reporters in Berlin on Tuesday, referring to Islamic State, which France blames for organizing the violence.
Any link between France’s worst terror attack since World War II and Europe’s refugee crisis would raise the stakes for Chancellor Angela Merkel as she defends her open-door policy for asylum seekers in Germany’s debate over immigration and security.
“It’s certainly unusual that such a person would have been faithfully registered in Greece and Serbia and Croatia, while we’re constantly pressing for registration and aren’t happy that it isn’t happening to the necessary extent,” de Maiziere said.
And with that the story on whether the passport was "planted" by someone else is effectively closed. The only open question remaining: who was so quick to plant the passport in the aftermath of the suicide bombing, and just whose agenda is in play?
»
- 338 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
"We're gonna need more nail guns." -- NATO
Ya don;t say?
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
The interior minister's official title is "Captain Obvious"
ZH is completely missing the point to the entire 'refugee' crisis. Stick to plugging gold!
https://twitter.com/HDNER/status/666906323515240448/photo/1?ref_src=twsr...^tfw
Minister ohne Hosen: https://jungefreiheit.de/debatte/kommentar/2015/minister-ohne-hosen/
German Interior Minister Says Suicide Bomber's Syrian Passport "May Have Been Planted"
You think?
Fuckin Turks!
Wow, we've never heard of this shit before!
"may have been planted"
I'm shocked.
"Death card. Let's Carlie know who did this."
MUST. GET. MOAR. WOAR. STARTED.
Excuse me while I enter my Safe Space...
This has upset my fragile worldview. I mean, whats next, a bunch of pirates will pillage and loot a ship, without so much as saying WHERE THEY CAME FROM?
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/11/16/washington-refines-its-false-...
It seems there is trouble in the NWO paradise...
You red down arrow voters need to better educate yourself on sarcasm. This is fucking Zero Hedge not Sesame Street - we shouldn't have to spell shit out around here.
How about the sleazebag Saudis? It isn't very nice, but that's a carpet-bombing I could rally around.
“The shooter was aged about 35 and had an extremely muscular build, which you could tell from the size of his arms. He looked like a weightlifter.
“He was not wearing gloves and his face was expressionless as he walked towards the bar.
“The driver had opened his door shortly before the shooting began and stood up with his arm and a machine gun rested on the roof of the car. He stood there with his foot up in the door acting as a lookout.
“I would describe him as tall, with dark hair and also quite muscular.
“They looked like soldiers or mercenaries and carried the whole thing out like a military operation. It was clear that they were both very heavily armed and the gunman was carrying several magazines on him.
“They both then coolly sat back in the car and sped off in the direction of the Bataclan Theatre.”
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paris-attack-witness-says-black-683...
Quoting Mahoud Admo;
''The gunman calmly reloaded his weapon several times. He then shot up at the windows in the street to make sure nobody was filming anything or taking photographs. It lasted over six minutes...'''
So, Admo can read minds? There was still a chance for someone to get video within 6 minutes time. Anytime there is no video, in this day and age, tells you all you need to know.
The authorities select whatever evidence fits their narrative. Does he question the WTC passports? Merkel wants open borders so the mass murderer can't be Syrian.
I'm interested in the possible German Russia alignment. I'm watching for Germany to switch sides, and how that will work within the EU construct. The Euro is the only thing holding the west alliance together maybe at this point.
Actually it's Chief Spook, and former Chief of Staff/Mouthpiece for the Wicked Witch of the East... the use of the word "may" pushes the whole thing down to Disinformation 101 level BS, sort of like those rumors about an ambulance that was "full of explosives" at the football match yesterday.
Could any human being act so dishonestly ? Never!!
When all you have is a hammer every problem has to look like a nail. the game of thrones drones on...
Syria is one of the last nations in the Middle East who still owns their Central Bank, and has no debt to the IMF. Need I say more?
OK, I'll continue. The alleged master mind of the Paris attack traveled to Syria as a foreign fighter. He was not a Syrian, was not invited by Syria, nor was he fighting for Syria, but against them!
There is NO SYRIAN CIVIL WAR!
They are being invaded by Rothschild mercenaries, hired foreign killers. Just like Iraq and Libya, the goal is to bring their central Bank under the thumb of the Bank of International Settlements. Nobody is trying to "save the children". They're fighting to enslave them.
When your goal is to enslave Syria, every terrorist must look like a Syrian, thus the fake planted Syrian passport...
I live in the suburbs of Jacksonville Florida. We are the home of the 5th largest Syrian population in America. I have a secret to tell you. THEY'RE ALMOST ALL CHRISTIANS!!! Nearly all of them own small businesses, and work very hard. They have very tight family structures and just want to raise their families in peace!
The fact is, Syria is the one place in the Middle East where Muslims and Christians lived peacefully side by side for hundreds of years. The oldest Christian Churches in the world are there - some built before Mohamed was even born and are still used today.
The Rothschild's are fomenting radical Islam across the world and paying to train and arm them. Terrorists are just ignorant pawns of the NWO!
Your enemy is the World's Banking Cabal, not the people of Syria!
END THE FED!
Amazing to me that they were able to kick up this terrorism mantra in the blink of an eye. Makes one wonder why they let it lie dormant for so long before reigniting.
There are plenty of Syrians in these parts too, far above average for any area of USA, and they are all Christian small business owners here as well.
Yep, the most radical Muslims are the Qataris, Saudi Arabians and Emiratis. But they are the closest ally of the Zionists, I mean West, and thus, we are told Libya, Syria, Turkey are EXTREMEMLY radical and scary. LOL.
When all you have is a can of soda, every can of soda looks like a bomb. (new DHS motto)
True about hard working Syrian people in America. My corner liquor store is owned by a Syrian family and I go in from time to time and chat up the owner. Back when the West was trying to demonize Assad for "gassing his own people" I asked him what he thought of that. He said it was all propaganda and the Syrian people love Assad and consider him a great leader. As a long time ZH reader, I was not shocked at all to hear that.
I gave you an up arrow because you are mostly right on. But how do you know its the Rothschilds?
There is a conspiracy that does a very good job of hiding itself. People who get too close to the truth die. If they
keep spinning and fingerpointing, they are disinfo agents.
The Rothschilds are part of the problem, just part.
Follow the money,
They own the Banks of the world and issue their currency.......
Look up "Gnosticism" on wikipedia.
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/11/18/you-who-allow-yourselves-t...
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/11/15/for-world-peace-arm-your-n...
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/in-reality-everything-is-c...
Every one of those is amplification of the message that any inhumanity comes back to byte us. If we do not do violence to each other, if we recognize that that is what it means to be a modern human, our rulers have a much harder time dividing us and thereby ruling as the arbitors necessary to keep civilization alive. In reality, we are the ones who rescue things after their very dumb decisions, things like world wars one after another, engineering ever-greater world-wide depressions, little things that give it way, they got no clue.
If it wasn't planted perhaps they should look into making black boxes and plane transponders out of terrorists passports.
I was thinking bullet proof vests and fire retardent clothing
In my mind it doesn't matter if they were Syrian or not.
They were Muslim and unless you're a Muslim they want you dead. That is from the Koran...it is better to kill and die killing than to be a non believer.
It's your government that wants you dead
You forget that our government is in bed with Islam. We have a president who was born Muslim according to sharia law, was raised as a muslim by his muslim stepfather, and whose administration is riddled with members of the Muslim Brotherhood, with a CIA head who is a crypto-muslim who converted during his years working in Saudi Arabia.
Ignore all this at your peril.
You are eyeballin' Valerie Jarrett instead of Rahm Emanuel (Chi-town commie). You are eyein' Barack Obama Sr and the Indonesian feller, instead of Frank Marshall Davis (Chi-town commie).
BHO went to a Muslim school in Indonesia. Did he say the Shahada?(Muslim profession of faith?
There's not 1chance in a 1000 he didn't.
it's not an either/or question
The Muslims must be the slowest fucking readers in the world if they only just got around to reading that part.
Think about it.
Perhaps you should give reading a go yourself. You'd obviously be surprised to discover that mahommedans have been engaged in continuous violence, including among the various forms of mahommedanism since mahommed founded the religion almost 1400 years ago.
At some times they were shoved back in their sand box by Europeans who developed greater strength of arms and an industrial society, but the mahommedans were still fighting and killing and enslaving where they could, particularly in Africa.
How do you know they were Muslim? They could have been German criminals dressed up in Polish uniforms.
What you Tonkin 'bout, Willis?
hey just stick to the Maine story here...
I think it was Dutch anarchists that burned down the Reichstag the fuehrer will need those emergency powers about now.
"They were Muslim and unless you're a Muslim they want you dead. That is from the Koran...it is better to kill and die killing than to be a non believer."
Not sure how you get downvoted for this. It's all in black and white in the Koran. They tell us that the Koran requires them to murder infidels; then we question their motivation?? (1) It's written down in their fucking book; (2) They quote their book and use it to justify their actions; (3) then we pretend that (1) and (2) don't exist. Who, exactly, are the crazy people?
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/023-violence.htm
The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.
Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subject to interpretation as anything else in the Quran.
The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God; however this works both ways. Most of today's Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Apologists cater to their preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.
Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed. Muhammad's own martial legacy - and that of his companions - along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history.
The Quran:
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.
Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."
Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.
Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."
Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').
Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.
So why is theological violence worse than economic or imperial ambition related violence? Also doesn't the Old Testament and Talmud have similarly violent exhortations towards it's followers? I like the New Testament, it's funny how the Old Testament and all it's justifications for everything from violence, infanticide and conquest just kinda hung around during the council of Niceae and allowed for future holy wars. But I digress. The bottom line is if you aren't defending family home and hearth I'm probably not on board with your desire to kill religious justification, geo-political imperative or not. Muslims aren't the problem, the darker side of human nature is.
Now don't going trying to point out the obvious and introduce intelligence into the bigger issue you raise. You might blow some minds here...
"Also doesn't the Old Testament and Talmud have similarly violent exhortations towards it's followers?"
Actually, no.
"Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subject to interpretation as anything else in the Quran."
"In an article entitled, “Throwing Stones at the Quran from a Glass House”, The American Muslim claims that the verses of violence and war in the Bible can be misread in “exactly the same way as some verses in the Qur’an” (emphasis ours). In other words, the on-line magazine alleges that, like the Quran, there are Biblical verses with open-ended commands to violence that are not bound by historical context within the passage itself.
Our first clue that this probably isn’t true is the scarcity of Christian terrorist groups. Not too many people are losing their heads to fanatics screaming praises to Jesus (or Moses, Buddha or the many Hindu gods either) as they are to shouts of “Allah Akbar!” That there are so many Islamic terrorist groups composed of fundamentalists (or purists) of the Muslim faith is enough to impress any reasonable person that there is something far more dangerous about Islam.
Nevertheless, to support their claim, The American Muslim quotes sixteen of the worst passages that the Bible has to offer in the way of violence. Others are alluded to as well, but delving into these particular verses should be a large enough sample to expose whatever sophistry might be at play...."
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Bible-Quran-Violence.htm
So the book of Leviticus doesn't exist? Any contextual historical basis that applies to violence and slavery (stoning to death nfl quarterbacks for touching a pig on the sabbath) should be considered and left out, but not the ones condemning homosexuality? Seems to me people take shit out of "historical" and other context to justify their theological reasons for political action all the freaking time. So no I don't buy what you're selling. All three Abrahamic faiths have used their texts (Old Testament, Talmud, Quran) to justify theft, mutder and conquest loooong after the New Testament was decided at niceaea. Occupied territories, crusades and Shia Sunni violence to name a few. Come on man any educated person sees that you are engaging in sophism and ignoring historical realities that back up my position. By all means though justify your crusade or genocide or imperial/economic ambitions however you like. I prefer what that Jesus guy said about healing the world and loving thy neighbor as thyself.
Christianity is not so much different: Or how do you think the present day Christian Roman Catholic Church got all of its the wealth and power it has today? Through love, peace and kumbayah, let's all hold hands???...LoL...No it was through terrorism, mass-murder and genocide...
All Abrahamic religions have more in common than they themselves like to admit. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have first of all deep connections to the patriarchal system. The roots of the intrinsic problems of these three religions - perpetrator-victim emphasis and salvationist ideology - point to their contribution to the alienation and agony of modern humanity.
Everybody who is trying to understand the psychospirirual currents underlying the present global crisis I recommend John Lamb Law's book 'Not in His Image'.
Perhaps you can enlighten us about the mass murder, theft, rape, destruction committed by Jesus Christ.
You will have no trouble finding all those things in the life of mahommed, of which mahommedans are well aware and which inspires them.
The words of Christ and of mahommed are each consistent with their own behavior.
Christians who genuinely believe their religion and engage in violence find themselves in mental turmoil though that has led to the concept of a "just war", e.g. in defence of family and country. mahommedans engaged in violence have no such restraint, indeed their religion encourages violence against all who are not true believers, something that Christianity does not.
And contrary to your assertions the Roman Catholic Church did not get its wealth (and it no longer has a lot of power) through terrorism, mass-murder and genocide. It came through being an extremely long-lived, centralised, organisation, which was well established in western society, which society has produced the industrial revolution and all the widespread wealth that has followed.
Most business organisations that get to be a few hundred years old become very wealthy before they decline. The Church has been in existence for almost two thousand years, so has far, far longer than most to accumulate assets.
Dude I was raised Catholic and you're high as a kite if you think the Vatican wasn't involved in genocide and murder. The Conquest of the Americas ring a bell? How about constantly sewing dissent among European nobility and playing sides off one another so no power would rise to challenge the church.
Napoleon was denied the title of Holy Roman Emperor because he was deemed too dangerous, same with . Meanwhile, drooling vegetable hapsburgs were routinely given that title and supported. Not to mention the Crusades, the Knights Templar who themselves had been originally given the papal blessing, eventually had their wealth subsumed by the European monarchs (who I might add aren't exactly good blokes, but lets put "The Black Nobility" aside for a moment) AND the Church.
Your reading of history is pretty incomplete if you are unaware of the constant coups, counter coups, assasinations and wars that all sprang from the Vatican.
By the way I'm a big fan of Jesus, I'm not nearly as big a fan of people INCLUDING THE VATICAN, using his name to shield their atrocities. It's like invoking Martin Luther King while oppressing black people. It's crazy.
My wife is Muslim. Should I be worried?
Fuck off.
Plus way to fuck up a good movie.
Wouldn't be worried about your wife but if you produce a son your neighbors ought to be.
Read the Book of Joshua if you want to see a treatise in how to commit genocide. God commands Joshua to kill not only all the Canaanite men, but all the women, the children, the infants in their cribs and even the cattle of the enemy.
In the Book of Samuel, Saul loses favor with God for sparing ONE Amalekite when he baeen ordered to kill every single last one, including all of the children.
Dearth of Christian terrorist groups? Christians don't need shadowy underground criminals when their national armies can do all the murder openly. 2 million Iraqis died as a result of a war of aggression launched by the US military, which is filled iwth devout Christians who thought that their destruction of a country that had not atacked them would bring Jesus back to earth.
Seems to have gone right over your head that Christians are followers of Christ, not of some guy named Joshua.
You know, Jesus Christ, they guy who said "turn the other cheek" if you are struck. Most Christians are raised on the new testament, i.e. the life and teachings of Jesus, and other than the ten commandments have never read any of the old testament about the carrying on of a bunch of jews.
The simple fact is that the founders and their behavior matter enormously. Anyone who behaves like Buddha or like Jesus will hurt no one. Anyone who behaves like Mahommed will steal, rape, murder, torture, destroy because that is what the man did and that is what his violent followers do.
Theological violence is worse because it can't be deterred, compromised with, bribed, intimidated, or otherwise influenced to stay its hand.
Comes in many forms, including bankers who claim to be doing God's work.
The first verse to the section you quote above is ommitted per usual. "Fight thise who fight you but do not commit aggression. God does not love aggressors" (2:190)
This is your intepretration : if you take what comes before and after (emphasis mine) :
And fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits.
And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers.
But if they desist, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
And fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah, but if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the oppressors.
--
I did not check the rest, but this part shows clearly that it is about self defence. If you want to read it otherwise, it's your right, but at least give the whole story if you claim to present facts and not opinions.
What matters is not your interpretation of some verse or other. What matters is the interpretation that will be made by a psychopath and whether that behavior appears also consistent with the behavior of the founder of the religion.
Incidentally you ought also to be aware that mahommed had fluctuations in his strength and power during his lifetime and the parts of the Quran he wrote when he was relatively weak were less bloodthirsty than when he was in the ascendant, and they put more emphasis on guile than outright force. But the purpose was always to win.
While you are apparently unaware of that, those brought up in the religion understand it intimately.
If what matters "is the interpretation of a pyschopath", why do you claim that the Kuran is calling for violence against non-Muslims ? I just proved you are wrong on your first example, and historical context won't change what is written and how any honest reader would interpret the text. You are either dishonnest or a troll, discussion closed.
Given the recent increases in acts of Terrorism the only possible interpretation is that after hundreds of years, some of the faster readers have finally got to this part of the Koran.
No, what changed was oil and open access to western societies that offered ongoing welfare payments to those who choose to not work.
When you have to work to stay alive, in a primitive society, there is not a lot of opportunity, particularly when you are kept out of target societies. But when members of a psychopathic religion are given lots of fee money (either from oil which only became valuable in recent times) or as a welfare check they can fully indulge their psychopathy. And when corrupt and stupid politicians invite you into the midst of those you consider your enemies, you have both means and opportunity.
Perhaps you'd better switch to the blue pill . . .
I mean seriously. Has anybody ever shown you some of the fucked up "requirements" in the Bible?? And yet there are only a handful of hard-core Christian fundamentalists who actually give a fuck about it.
Grow the fuck up.
Seriously, are you fucking serious or just out for an afternoon Troll?
Mahommed designed a religion for psychopaths, rewarding the most evil behavior so long as it was directed at those deemed not true believers. He not only designed the religion, he exhibited all the psychopathic behavior himself, so any later follower can find justification in both the words of the Quran and in the behavior of its founder, and no one can claim to be a muslim while rejecting the founder of the religion. The combination is important because it eliminates all ambiguity about the words.
Had mohammed been some clerical scribbler sitting idly in a cave, then maybe there would have been some possible ambiguity about the words. But when the words align with the founder's own behavior there is no uncertainty except for the dishonest trying to hide the true nature of mahommedanism.
There are psychopaths everywhere in the world but most religions and societies decry their behavior and attempt to control them. Only mahommedanism endorses their behavior and gives them free rein and those unleashed psychopaths, whether killing people or preaching in the mosques, attract and lead others who may not be fully psychopathic but are excited by violence.
Not all mahommedans are psychopaths, which is why not all are terrorists but their religion and governance, which are intertwined, give them no basis for opposing the psychopaths, in fact it tells them to support the psychopaths. And since you can't know which people are going to breed psychopaths any more than you can know which will breed a genius, an apparently docile Mahommedan couple (or triple, or whatever) can produce a psychopath in a western society and the religion in which they immerse their child gives him the licence and encouragement to go out and kill non believers, and to expect and rely on support and assistance from his co-religionists.
I trust everyone learns from the truly psychoipathic behavior that you cite. Definitely, the anscient wisdom is still true, allowing yourself to hate allows great evil.
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/in-reality-everything-is-c...
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/11/15/for-world-peace-arm-your-n...
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/11/18/you-who-allow-yourselves-t...
Proving that his IQ is higher than that of a potted plant
This wouldn't be the first time recently that a member of the German government has said something controversial..
Saudi Arabia already has nuclear weapons:
http://www.vocativ.com/news/227537/aide-tells-clinton-saudi-arabia-alrea...
Turdboy was recycling old news and making it sound new by attributing it to Fischer, perhaps he got tired of recycling Drumheller's BS. That Hitlery didn't flag his AOL account as SPAM, should not only be a disqualification for running for president, but it should be grounds for immediate commitment to a mental institute or trailer park.
Do they have McCain's fingerprints on file? Might wanna run it against those.
pods
He is an administration appointment by Merkel, he's just defending his boss. Not that he is wrong, he might be right, but he is a biased person to listen to.
Planted, because admitting otherwise is unthinkable.......
"The only open question remaining: who was so quick to plant the passport in the aftermath of the suicide bombing, and just whose agenda is in play?"
A: The Usual Suspects. Agents of TPTB.
BTW... it's unny, how the US, then Russia, and now France's MIC get to use ISIS/Terrorism as a Carte Blanche for their budgets and use it as cover for other woes that their contries are experiencing. "The more things change..."
Mayhem... it's what planted passports crave
Planted? Nah. Long explosive-proof passports
This Minister sounds like a novice... he needs to go to the US embassy for some CIA training.
This person and his boss have the most to gain from saying it was planted. Bad example.
"The sun may have risen yesterday."
Who gives a fuck where this guy came from. What if they had found an American passport, or an Israeli passport? Would that then be sufficient justification for bombing the shit out of THOSE countries.....??
It matters in this instance because of the refugees going all over the place. That's causing mass hysteria to get their gov'ts to take speedy action now and take away more rights when more "attacks" happen in countries trying to destroy ISIS.
It seems like Syria is no more given that any country can just bomb it now...
Nazis did it.
Planted by... Santa Claus? He had one of his elves whip one up? These gov aholes are so desperate it's pathetic and insulting.
"that it could be a deliberate attempt to implicate refugees and “make people feel unsafe,” de Maiziere said."
Right... as if that would be of such benefit to them that they would give up their rat line into the heart of Europe.
Well by the end of the year zee Germans should have their own blood in the streets and let's see the mental gymnastics these scumbags will go through then. Because they certainly won't have the honour to resign. No will be fired let alone go to prison of course.
I don't know....it is the Germans. Quite a history of getting upset and whipping ass. Any other country over there and I would not worry, they are just like our people (free loaders, free shitters and pussy heads to generalize) - and even softer.
The Germans, not the politicians, the people themselves are pretty dangerous. When the killing starts, it will be too late. Critical mass will have been achieved, and the killing will have to run its course. These are the people that made the legions disappear along with a whole lot of others.
And several of the bombers were actually French, hmmmm....
THE ENTIRE GERMAN GOVERNMENT IS A JOKE!
The Chancellor? Every time there is a crisis she just says nothing.
The defence minster? No qualifications for the job whatsoever.
The Interior minister? Too chicken to tell his people the truth.
de Maiziere is as much of an ass as Merkel.
This article just feeds the paranoid...nothing for the sane.
was it the cia, fbi nsa or obunga's special force's
Gee, let's see. Is this telling the truth because:
1) It's the 'real truth' and should be told because it's the right thing to do?
2) Are we telling a partial truth on the way to obfuscation, ie, tell them a little truth to lead them in another direction away from the larger truth?
I think #2
I'm soooooooo surprised at this statement.
http://25.media.tumblr.com/8a1aed763fbfcc3863b7be722a0919f7/tumblr_mijx1...
Thanks for the virus
I wonder if this precedes the real story coming out? Perhaps in Europe they will have more courage than we have had on this side of the pond and start holding people (politicians and then banksters) accountable?
"German Interior Minister Says Suicide Bomber's Syrian Passport "May Have Been Planted"
No it wasn't...it was the video I tells ya...
Still trying to get to the bottom of this:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paris-attack-witness-says-black-683...
Maybe it was Jonny Cash........
Red scarf. Theres a clue here somewhere?
What if the plan was to intentionally have the planted passport to be outed just like this? Thus allowing Merkel & others to claim the new Syrian's who just marched in are peace loving muslims and would never do anything like this....
Cui Bono
" passport may have been planted " ????? DUH say it isn't so ! they'd never do something like that
LOL
It doesn't mtter.. All terrorists involved in Paris are muslim and ex-refugee themselves.. Eventually some of the Syrian refugee will start their terroist plot in the near future.. Cycle keep on repeating
Paris Hoax Smoking Gun: Missing Door Behind Bataclan
http://winteractionables.com/?p=27420
The passport does not matter. What matters is that the suicide bomber was fingerprinted as a refugee a few weeks ago.
Sounds like a wild conspiracy theory. Where is the proof? I don't believe it. (SARC)
Sure would like to know what these passports are made of. They survive plane crashes, bombs without a scratch.
They matched one of the bomber's fingerprints to fingerprints taken with the passport in a different country. How on earth could the passport be a "plant" when the fingerprints match?
The biggest false flag clue?
What about the Black Mercedes of white professional military mercenaries?
What about the terror alert drills being conducted in Paris the same day, on November 13?
What about the Bataclan venue being sold by its Jewish owners on September 11 this year?
What about the Times of Israel changing an article which initially stated that the Jewish community in Paris was warned of an imminent terrorist attack on the morning of November 13?
What about the Economist front cover that practically gives away the exact place and date of the attacks?
"All of these are absolute coincidences, please be assured."
Yours truly
CIA local representative.
And here would be the exact reason they'd plant that passport. Just as Bin Laden's goal for 9/11 was to sucker the US into incredibly expensive and counterproductive wars in the Middle East, ISIS wants to start major blowback against Muslims already within western countries which could then lead to:
ISLAMIC STATE’S GOAL: “ELIMINATING THE GRAYZONE” OF COEXISTENCE BETWEEN MUSLIMS AND THE WEST
https://theintercept.com/2015/11/17/islamic-states-goal-eliminating-the-...
The attack had “further [brought] division to the world,” the group said, boasting that it had polarized society and “eliminated the grayzone,” representing coexistence between religious groups. As a result, it said, Muslims living in the West would soon no longer be welcome in their own societies. Treated with increasing suspicion, distrust and hostility by their fellow citizens as a result of the deadly shooting, Western Muslims would soon be forced to “either apostatize … or they [migrate] to the Islamic State, and thereby escape persecution from the crusader governments and citizens,” the group stated, while threatening of more attacks to come.
Cool. Good job IS. I very much agree with this. Now we can wipe out the scourage once and for all. Thank-you IS.
Sounds plausible except that since the terrorist invasion of Syria and Iraq before that, more muslims have come to the West as refugees.
The Western response to the Paris attack is to step-up the bombing of ISIS in Syria and that will increase the refugee numbers.
I can't see vast numbers of muslims currently living in the West wanting to go to a sandpit that's been destroyed by their own brothers.
Godammed anti semitic german nazis
May have been planted. That's all it takes for Gods Truth on ZH.
it appears the europeans have grown a pair and are staging a revolt against their zionazi handlers.
"The only open question remaining: who was so quick to plant the passport in the aftermath of the suicide bombing, and just whose agenda is in play?"
That is the question.
I don't buy the German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere's explanation that it might have something to do with discrediting refugees because if planted it was done by someone working for an agency of The State. But which State? Not Germany for sure.
There is an agenda in play....
Noooooo. Who could do such a thing. This German Interior Minister such a tinfoil hat.
So the German minister responsible for implementing Merkel's disastrous "flood the country with aliens" policy clutches at straws in the desperate hope it was not one of the people in the flood unleashed by Merkel.
Who exactly was supposed to have "planted" this passport and for what purpose? Was it Hollande, the gibbering idiot, trying to discredit Merkel's policy?
Has this guy been doing a Rip van Winkle for the last decade. We have repeatedly seen muslim suicide bombers making videos before the event. Far from hiding their identity after the event they prepare to release their identity, in this case via a passport, because they want their family, friends and the world to know that they were the person who did it.