This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Is Times Square Next? ISIS Releases Video Of Suicide Bomber Preparing To Detonate In NYC
Earlier this week, Americans were shocked - shocked - when ISIS released a new video threatening to attack Washington DC.
The clip - another Hollywood special shot in full HD - is a kind of mini-lecture series featuring three jihadist speakers. One is an intellectual-looking fellow who calmly makes his case against a serene looking oasis background, another is a raving, crazy-eyed militant who is inexplicably sitting in the driver’s seat of a pickup truck, and the third is a soldier flanked by two not-so-serious looking comrades speaking against a backdrop that features some shrubs and an armored vehicle manned by a couple of set extras and/or character actors.
As patently absurd as it was, it scared a lot of people and at least according to new “information” acquired in raids by French police this week, the militants were indeed intent on keeping at least one of the promises they made in the video - that is, staging more attacks on France, as Reuters reported on Wednesday that the cell raided in St-Denis planned to attack La Defense and the Quatre Temps.
The video described above was actually one of two released on the same day by Furat Media and indeed, ISIS’ video production team has been working overtime this week to capitalize on the frenzy around the Paris attacks.
Furat's latest effort (out last night apparently) is another France montage but there’s a notable 30 second portion which depicts a man building a suicide belt, strapping it on, walking into a crowd, and hitting the switch.
There are still shots of New York (specifically Times Square) that flash throughout.
So, basically, ISIS is threatening to detonate a bomb in Times Square, but don't worry, Bill De Blasio and NYPD Chief Bill Bratton say you should not be "intimidated." Here's GOP mouthpiece Fox News:
Police Commissioner William Bratton described the video as "hastily produced," while Mayor Bill De Blasio insisted that New Yorkers "should continue to go to work, live their lives, and enjoy the greatest city in the world."
"Be aware, but do not be afraid. The NYPD will protect you," Bratton said. "We cannot be intimidated, and that's what terrorists seek to do. They seek to create fear. They seek to intimidate. We will not be intimidated, and we will not live in fear."
Well, some people undoubtedly will be fearful, which is fine because if you're Washington (and especially if you're The Pentagon) you need to keep the fear factor sufficiently elevated to ensure that the public continues to blindly support the lunatic "mission" in Syria.
However, it's a delicate balance, because while you want the public to be mad enough to support continued intervention, what you don't want is an outright voter rebellion wherein suddenly, everyone starts asking the tough questions (like when an exasperated Jim Acosta asked Obama why America doesn't "just take out these bastards") because that's when the narrative starts to unravel and you start having to try and explain why ISIS is a useful destabilizing element in Syria where the top priority (above all else up to and including fighting ISIS), is ousting the Assad government.
In any event, we'd also note that this is at least the second time this year that ISIS has used stock footage of a TGI Friday's. Apparently Islamic State, like everyone else in the known universe, has had a bad TGI Friday's experience at one time or another...
»
- 376 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
I demand a full body search of Smelly Elmo immediately. That fucker has terrorist written all over his furry red face!
Why does the film say, "Copyright CIA 2015...All Rights Reserved"?
Well in times square they might kill more arabs than new yorkers.
"We have killed 18 pakistani food truck vendors and 8 venezuelan desnudas, take that!"
Obama: "ISIS. You didn't build that - we did!"
Never let a crisis go to waste, even if it is created by us.
Signed The Banksters.
Explain your actions to the American people, Barack.
ISIS + NYC = NEMESIS for these mercenaries payroll
"Terrorism is the best political weapon for for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death." - CIA... I mean Adolf Hitler
...I smell Mossad all over this...
I'm not worried 'cause Barry said he's "vetting" the tearrists.
Illegal Alien Crime Accounts for over 30% of Murders in Many Stateshttp://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/08/08/illegal-alien-crime-a...
Fuck Breitbart and the rest of the right wing proganda machine.
^^^^^a Obama voter strikes back^^^^^^^
Ok, I give up MIC / Neocons, hold me I'm scared soooo scared... Please save me from the boogeyman.... {s}
Fuck off; operation wetback/camelback to commence in.....
Sutler: What we need right now is a clear message to the people of this country. This message must be read in every newspaper, heard on every radio, seen on every television... I want *everyone* to *remember*, why they *need* us!
They won’t use bombs here as bombs don’t fit the narrative.
They will use guns a’ la Paris.
Obama isn’t focusing on bomb control in his last year.
Watching all of this unfold is like watching a 1950's horror flick in slow motion... You don't know whether to piss yourself laughing or to cry because it is really happening, again...
If they detonate outside Goldman Sachs or JPM... I'm all for it.
Here's how it will play out. In Obama's last month or so, he will secretly write an EO that will grant the office some extraordinary powers, and then the next guy will come in after a major catastrophe, which will come in the form of a supposed terrorist attack. He will immediately be able to use that EO to his advantage.
Preferably inside one of their board meetings or at least some executive lunch.
Could "someone" please give these fucktard goatfuckers the addresses of Goldstein Sachs, JP Morganstern, Jamie, LLoyd, the NYfed, and any other relevant targets, and tell them to quit killing people that have fuckall to do with anything.
Where do you think their paycheck ultimately comes from?
Where do you think their paycheck ultimately comes from?
Uh, Yarmulkeland? The brotherhood of the Kippah?
Do tell.
All wars are banker wars.
Or all Bankers are war whores.
Well, I'm not onboard with every crazy theory, but I can follow money downstream as opposed to upstream.
If NY gets a bomb, they'll also get a billion $ in homeland security that will work it's way into the pockets of many individuals, security companies, construction companies, police departments, those who sell equipment to police departments, politicians, etc...
...so, there's a lot of people who gain from every explosion (this is part of the tragedy in America)
He also said ISIS was contained. So we are good...right?
"...I smell Mossad all over this..."
Maybe, but on the other hand, you smell Mossad all over everywhere else too.
I small a Khazar.
You are a small khazar
nO YOU JUST SMELL. yEA iSRAEL IS SUPPORTING THESE GUYS ...THAT MAKES SENSE DOESN'T IT. iT IS A SHAME WHEN YOU HATE A GROUP OF PEOPLE AND IT COMPLETELY BLINDS YOU.
Has anyone been able to quantify exactly what is at the root of all this?
I mean... We want rid of Assad so the world can have another pipeline?
What exactly is the value of this pipeline? Is it still material?
Or are we now at the point of spending a trillion dollars to achieve a hundred billion dollar goal?
Your last line sums it up. That is their goal. Keep the debt increasing while they increase their power.
pods
Krugman plan in action.
The goal is to diminish Russia's power by supplanting its petroleum with MENA petroleum. Russia's economy hinges on commodity exports, and energy is a sizable portion of that. Beyond attacking spending, it's difficult to foil NATO against Russia militarily when Moscow can turn the heat and lights off for much of Europe. There are other tangents to this gambit, but this is a primary motivation. For example, Israel & Saudi Arabia can keep the region unstable to maintain power, while destroying a major ally of Iran, one of the ultimate prizes.
But your primary assumption is unfounded.
What benefit is there to reducing the power of Russia?
Before all this started, Russia was playing ball, was gleefully disarming, joined WTO, invited foreign investment (BP, Exxon, etc), sharing technologies on medicine and physics, etc, etc.
What benefit is there to continually poking the Russians with a stick?
Yes now they are angry, but back in 2010 everyone was friends. Now we have Cold War 2.0 / a WWIII arms race, all over some poxy Qatari gas line.
Valid points. There are those on this site that contend that Russia is still "playing ball" and that the entire ISIS show is exactly that. Even still, none of those inroads stopped NATO from encircling Russia with missles in the meantime. Hegemons will be hegemons, and we cannot trust that their motives are always rational. The Petrodollar must be preserved at all costs, an all must be wrung through that grinder when necessary. MENA are more easily controlled and completely bought in to this arrangement, Russia is not. Death throws are always violent.
PNAC dude. Where you been?
"In 1992, then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney had a strategy report drafted for the Department of Defense, written by Paul Wolfowitz, then Under-Secretary of Defense for Policy. In it, the U.S. government was urged, as the world's sole remaining Superpower, to move aggressively and militarily around the globe. The report called for pre-emptive attacks and ad hoc coalitions, but said that the U.S. should be ready to act alone when "collective action cannot be orchestrated." The central strategy was to "establish and protect a new order" that accounts "sufficiently for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging our leadership," while at the same time maintaining a military dominance capable of "deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role." Wolfowitz outlined plans for military intervention in Iraq as an action necessary to assure "access to vital raw material, primarily Persian Gulf oil"
I would also suggest you look at general W. Clark's revelations on the neocons plan for all of the Middle East.
Etc.
Etc.
Furthermore, the Wolfowitz doctrine's specific goal was to prevent any other power, including the Russians from even aspiring to any rivalry to the U.S. To this end the US would invoke pre emptive strikes.
Some Quotes: "Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power...he U.S. must show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests. In non-defense areas, we must account sufficiently for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order. We must maintain the mechanism for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role... While the U.S. cannot become the world's policeman, by assuming responsibility for righting every wrong, we will retain the preeminent responsibility for addressing selectively those wrongs which threaten not only our interests, but those of our allies or friends, or which could seriously unsettle international relations....We continue to recognize that collectively the conventional forces of the states formerly comprising the Soviet Union retain the most military potential in all of Eurasia; and we do not dismiss the risks to stability in Europe from a nationalist backlash in Russia or efforts to reincorporate into Russia the newly independent republics of Ukraine, Belarus, and possibly others....We must, however, be mindful that democratic change in Russia is not irreversible, and that despite its current travails, Russia will remain the strongest military power in Eurasia and the only power in the world with the capability of destroying the United States....
etc.
the "Wolfowitz Doctrine" was simply a scam to keep the MIC intact in the face the absence of the Soviet Union as a bogeyman.
one of the spawn of that doctirine, the F35, is all anyone needs to know about the legitimate military intent
I vote for this one
In case anybody hasn’t looked at the demographics and trends..
Russia has all the market they need with just two customers..
China and India.
The EU, as a US vassal has done a pretty good job of screwing itself but the fun has just begun.
By the way.. what three countries on earth represent the largest concentration of physical gold?
Consider the amount of money spent on the Presidential race vs. the actual paycheck.
Standard Disclaimer: Although I could do quite comfortably with that paycheck, so elect the Wizard and I promise two unicorns in every pot.
The idea is to circumvent the Russian NG monopoly in order to reduce Russian economic influence (particularly as a competitor currency to the USD/EUR). That is worth pretty much an unlimited amount of fiat, whatever that is worth.
.. as G Celente would say-
not worth the paper it is not printed on.
You fucked up. - Barack
The NYPD will protect you? Bwahahahahah! Those fuckers will kill you, maim you, steal from you, and tyrannize you. I dont think they're gonna protect you. Reap it, libtards living in NYC. You get what you deserve.
NYC - taxes, tyranny, and terrorism . . . all world class!!!
The obot fucks up everything he touches.
Obese NYC coppers pepper spraying a bunch of harmless women.
Classy showing there!
Reminds me of South Park...
NYPD: "We shoot people or else they'll die (from ISIS)
*Stamps Feet*
Obama to the American people: "Come on folks, I don't have to. I am your president!"
*Stamps Feet"
LOL: The NYPD will protect you
THis unemployed man needed a laugh this AM. Thanks, DeBlasio!
Why do they need to do an elaborate plan for Times Square?
How about 1000 of them with suicide belts at 1000 different WalMart/Macey's on BLACK FRIDAY? Winter coats will hide the belts. Set detonation time 5 minutes before the doors open while everyone is packed outside waiting to get in. Easy, if you don't mind being a martyr. They would kill thousands. It would bring this nation to its knees.
Fed can blame the crash on the Black Friday Terror attacks, so they're off the hook.
TGI Friday...Thanks GIving day Friday. Could that be a tell?
That would be the best possible day to do it, when masses are at the malls...think I'll do my shopping via Amazon this Christmas.
I have NEVER participated in that madness except when I was in my 20s and HAD to because I worked at a mall.
Charlton Heston said it best:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFCM6TZgTMI
What does CIA have to gain by creating ISIS... if they really wanted assad gone couldnt they do just a 'regime change'. Why go through all the trouble of creating (according to people here) a terrorist organisation, training them, arming them, and after taking out assad taking them out?
Do some basic research and all your questions will be answered.
Just because one or two former CIA agents said that doesnt mean its necessarily true, you people are just taking their word for it. Former digruntled employees will be tempted to say all sorts of lies.
I am not dodging your question. Some simple basic research will answer all your questions. I don't have time to write a thousand word essay to explain. Get off your dead ass and stop expecting others to cater to you.
All i get is some former employees or some people implicating the CIA without providing proof. This could very well be the work of other intel agencies.
So many possibilities...
Start here:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/america-created-al-qaeda-and-the-isis-terro...
His question is legit if you take away the emphasis on CIA.
If your goal is to do regime change in Syria, creating terrorist groups is a pretty stupid way of going about it. This is on Bush and the kenyan nigger (I won't even use his name).
What they did wrong in Iraq was firing everyone in the Iraqi army and police force. Those guys, now out of work, reformed into militias and got their revenge by guerrilla war. Now, 15 years later, the place is in ruins and the people wish they had Saddam back.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/covert-cia-mission-to-arm-syrian-rebels-goes...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-begins-weapon...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/05/07/u-s-military-will-train...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/15/us/politics/cia-study-says-arming-rebe...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/10/10/cia-backed-syrian-rebels-were...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone
Whew! that took all of five minutes!
Those articles are about arming rebels, not every rebel is ISIS. Sure some might have gone on to join ISIS later, but when CIA knows this and still continues arming them after that, only then it can be said it is arming ISIS.
Its one thing to say CIA armed rebels, another thing to say CIA created ISIS.
Are you really THAT stupid?
Are you really that stupid to understand, that it is easier to do regime change or even buy off assad if they want him gone or didnt want him to oppose US, rather than creating a terror organisation from scratch only to have the organisaion render the entire country useless for any pipe line to go, even theirs.
After the clusterfuck in Libya, USSA couldn't get their no-fly zone in Syria (FOR THEIR REGIME CHANGE).
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/russia-angry-about-libya-won-t-suppo...
There are many ways to do regime change, even without no-fly zones or resolutions from nato or sc.
Yes, there are many ways, but sometimes none of them work.
Why do you think there is no attempt at regime change in Russia?
What makes you think no attempts have been made? We just dont know it yet. You think people really wouldnt have tried?
Forget the pipeline and Assad. The ultimate goals are: a) permanent chaos in ME and b) exporting that chaos to Russia.
Now roll back your logic and take those as your starting points.
I thought the goal was oil or oil pipelines. Permanent chaos is bad for the business of these two.
I guess you thought wrong.
I guess you thought wrong.
How would you buy off Syrian government knowing they are russian allies ? Plus you've to take destructions route to push your economy and profit your weapons manufacturers.
Everybody has a price.
Weapons manufacturers? How many weapons do you think US got to sell?
How many weapons do you think US got to sell?
Wrong question again.
You are thinking about export sales and forgetting that the biggest buyer is US military.
How many weapons? Well, about 600 billion worth on a yearly basis.
So when they are already selling 600 billl worth of weapons already, it sounds farfetched to think they created ISIS just to sell more weapoms to the military esp when US mil has only a small presence in it. Now if US mil entered syria full fledged, the weapon purchase theory would have made more sense.
The night is young...
Why would they enter Syria if they can do a regime change (without ISIS)?
Or maybe they didnt i.e cia isnt arming them anymore (after they joined isis) or create ISIS? The US mil didnt enter syria to help isis.
You are not getting it. The idea is that CIA created ISIS so that US mil would have a publicly good enough excuse to go into Syria to defeat it. Something like Sadam's WMDs.
That is also the reason why ISIS is getting so much publicity.
Now that Russians are heavily involved, the whole plan will probably not play out as intended.
But thats not what i was trying to counter. I was trying to counter the narrative here that CIA/Mossad created ISIS to destabilise assad.
Corsair clearly answered your concern above. You seem to be dense on purpose.
Don't feed the trolls, this one is starving.
Notice his screen name, an amateur attempt to impersonate a valued ZH member.
So anybody who has a different opinion than yours is a troll? Should everybody on ZH think alike, quack alike?
Lol I understood your game Another..... . You got answer to your obvious questions and purposefully you switch to other things. Enough to prop their dying empire.
Right from the beginning the only think i was trying to ask was/is the same thing. I didnt switch to other things. Read all my comments if you want.
and it has been answered . Your purpose of question ends there.
Here: Putin explains very calmly who created ISIS: https://youtu.be/1d-xbnuvr7c?t=52s
Yes Putin, the one person who is ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING about these goatfuckers
What putin says is who armed the rebels, who sent money to them, who created the conditions, not created ISIS. Every rebel is not ISIS or atleast was not, to begin with.
I guess you aren't following the zh updates on syria or you're an obvious *coughs* .
See day before yesterday he shared a US DOD document revealing US support to ISIS . Go read that article again.
US bombing syria for past one year and in result ISIS expanded. Still you doubt your govt intentions ?
Deconstructing the NATO Narrative on Syria : Whole Syrian Mess in chronologyI have been following zh updates, but they were one-sided. Let me get back to you after reading the DoD document.
Ah! how cleverly you neglected my last link it answers your every rhetorical question about Syrian govt destabilization by US. But you didn't pay attention to it.
iI didnt respond to it because i havent read it. I have not read it because its too long. I need to read every sentence of it to pick holes in it, dont i? And it will take time to do that. Hence i didnt respond. I will get back to you after reading that and the DoD one.
Define " You people " for us.
The people who implicate CIA/MOSSAD for everydamn thing.
So you have nothing...I see.
Define 'nothing'
The space between your ears?
Its called head. It pays to use yours too sometimes, instead of blindly lapping up your fellow ZH commenters narrative every single time. People here say mossad created ISIS, others here believe it, people say CIA created it, others here believe it.
Begone you fucking idiot troll.
In my earlier comment to you i asked you if everybody on here should think alike and quack alike when you called me a troll. Now you have done it again, so i guess you want everybody here to be like that.
Perkins: Confessions of an Economic Hitman (Former CIA)
things havent changed
it's tough when you sit in the back of the history class
So assuming for the sake of argument they did it before, they therefore are doing it again, regardless of it making sense.
Since when has government done anything that made sense? Sir....
So you are implying they chose the harder route (creating ISIS to destabilise assad) instead of doing a regime change, out of stupidity?
Find out what happened after Libya. They couldn't get their no-fly zone in Syria because Russia and China would not go along.
As many people have pointed out...DO SOME FUCKING RESEARCH!!!
Regime change with the Russians having ties politically and through their water port at Tartus? Methinks not. Much easier to create havoc via training "rebels" who destabilize and then go in and clean up with a puppet as new leader. The problem is that these trained folks are a little more complex than the average goatfucker. They actually believe in the whole apocalypse thing and gamed the CIA. Now, they run wild. It's a clusterfuck. We aided its creation. I stand by for more of your "questions". Make sure you insult me too for good measure.
An Allahywood production.
AmeriKa, israel, UK, etc. have an agenda that they dare not fulfill openly and confidently. Could be because their goals have nothing to do with morals, or civility, or humanity. Perhaps this is why they hide and let drugged out terrorists and mercenaries do their dirty work creating facts on the ground, like vile cowards under the cloak of plausible deniability.
Try to catch Glenn Greenwald at 17 mins on the 11/19 show
Some good comments on the current and ongoing bullshit our government/media is feeding us on these attacks.
http://www.democracynow.org/
Was that big bad desert rat wearing a Rolex King Air?
I call jihad on the Jack Daniels Boneless Bourbon Wings!
33 Liberty St, New York, NY 10045
or here;
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/348546345
Maybe we should "flood" them out
Allah says you must have 37 pieces of flair!
I have a 1/2 an appetizer coupon at Chotchkie's if you want to meet for lunch.
And if ISIS should need any help with bigger ordnance they should contact this guy... He'll put you in touch with the right sources in getting the "job done" when you're in the "Big Apple"!!!
No sense in disrupting the MSM mouthpiece at this point with the propaganda. At this stage they might as well just come out and say we are the voice that endorses the actions of "ISIS" because we get paid well to do so!
The "sheep" will do the rest!!!
I call it bluff until Obama wide open his back door for the Syrian refugees.
Fear tactics. How come videos of Americans showing survival skills, or videos from Journalsts (Hastings) are deleted or never even make it into the MSM, but these "videos" are free flowing right into the groins of couch potatos?
Effing BS manipulation. But, imo we will see an 'event' in NYC regardless because why the fuck not? Our leaders allow this shit to happen.
To contravene the next liberty, we must first sacrifice some idiots. Aint collateral damage grand? Please, please, please, take some Goldman BalSack banksters off to Satanallah!
Which sells more ads on MSM,,, A survival video or NYC smoldering with bodies scattered about?
It's a Threefor,,, more money for MSM, more skeered citizens and more tyrannical legislation from con-gress.
Don't be a chubby black or Arab guy wearing a coat in New York City unless you like having your anal cavity searched!
Suicide butt plugs? If you pucker, does that trigger a detonation? Don't give them ideas...
Suicide Butt plugs ??? Merde !!!
Shooting lightening bolts out your ass. I like it!
http://rectaltronics.com/
they are way ahead of you.....
Ms. is on a roll ;-)
Will they make them big enough to shove up a really big cunt?
I'm thinking Hillary.
"Snuke" South Park already cover that one
Hahahaha. Muslim men may have some slack in their backsides from everything I've heard about their rich and vibrant culture over the years.
a request to the "terrorists" cause I know they read zero hedge - consider a put and call on NYSE, 11 Wall Street. please and thank you.
Confirmed that even ISIS hates the mediocrity that is TGI Friday ... more Hollyjihad productions surface threatening Russia .... just another week in the new normal. -Dave
Its fake. I didn't see a beer can in the video. Oh wait, I forgot beer cans are only used on planes.
THEY'LL PUT IT IN A SMALL 50oz COLA CUP!!!!OSE IN NEW YORK ASAP!!!
The Magik Door of Bataclan: Debunking the Debunkers
http://winteractionables.com/?p=27449
after 6 hard shots of Jose Q, i see what yoar(excuse em) sayin' nowz> wITH THaT lighting boy. macheek door an THa stix peeple/ bravo.
Not much you çan do to stop it, fragile world we have built. Give good guys ccw and give the fuckers an express trip to allala land.
Perhaps the upside of all this (NWO backed) 'terror' is that people will retreat, moving to the country-land and begin the agrarian renaissance we so badly need to have where people actually develop skills, backbone and community and leave the central planners in the dust - so to speak.
Actuallly the latest info is that people, especially what's left of the Middle Class, are bailing for the hills. Washington, DC, among other big ciies, lost population for the last several years. Cities are for the 1% and the FSA. The attractive, or once attractive, big cities have priced themselves out of almost anyone's reach. San Francisco being the biggest example.
"Be aware, but do not be afraid. The NYPD will protect you"
does that sort of open NYPD up to some degree of financial liability if something, anything, happens to me, or anyone?
Its so good to see that the State of NY has disarmed its citizens and they have no means of self protection, cause after all ( said in slow motion ) the..Government ..is...here ..to ....protect ...you.
http://www.laslow.net/reactiongifs/Batch03/Blink.gif
The government IS here to protect you.
You don't have to take my word for it. Just go to any indian reservation. They'll tell you the same thing.
Oh you mean shopping at Wal-Mart? that reservation.. Besides I wouldn't take your word for it, your just a figment of text, your word is meaningless, or just as I stated...words.
You ask Stan Grossman, he'll tell ya the same thing!
Note of warning to terrorists: NYPD are trained to shoot everthing within a 20 degree cone of a target! You can run but you're safer standing still.
"Don't run, you'll just die tired."
BRILLIANT
It doesn't take genius to figure out why they NEVER target government locations. I sure wish the masses would wake up sooner then later.