This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Seeking A Savior
Submitted by Jeff Thomas via InternationalMan.com,
It’s an unfortunate truth that, when people are worried about the future, they often put their faith in politicians to somehow make everything better.
Politicians, of course, are famous for promising panaceas for whatever is troubling voters, and they even invent new troubles to worry about, presenting themselves as the only ones who can solve these woes.
Not surprising then, that, over time, any nation may slowly deteriorate into a population of nebbishes who turn to their government to do their thinking for them and take responsibility for their futures.
In the last year, the world has seen many elections in which the top spot (president, prime minister, premier, etc.) was contested. In Brazil, socialist President Dilma Rousseff was returned, but almost immediately ran into trouble over a failing economy, scandals, and corruption charges. In less than a year, her popularity sank to the lowest level for any Brazilian president on record.
In the UK, conservative Prime Minister David Cameron was returned, which immediately triggered riots in London by the anti-austerity crowd. He will soon be facing increasingly angry voters of all stripes who are boiling over with the dramatically worsening immigration question. In addition, he’ll soon be facing a referendum on the UK’s membership in the EU - an eventuality he’s been postponing for quite some time.
In Canada, voters have chosen to oust the conservatives and return to the golden promises of the Trudeaus. The Canadian dollar dropped immediately. Justin Trudeau plans a vast programme of public spending in the face of a declining economy, but hasn’t offered any explanation as to how this can be paid for.
Argentina has just had its election. The departing Peronist, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, has passed the baton (and a failing economy, rapidly declining peso, and civil unrest) to the more conservative Mauricio Macri.
Do we see a pattern here? No, except in the sense that countries habitually put in a conservative for a while, tire of him, and replace him with a liberal, then tire of him, and replace him with a conservative.
None of these leaders will be the solution to the problems of their nations. In fact, they are the problem. Each of them (and many others around the world) offered dramatic, unrealistic campaign promises for ever-increasing largesse from the government. Each will increase national debt to maintain a government that’s already drowning in debt, in order to fulfil their promises, with an understood endgame that, at some point, the economy hits the wall. Citizens with opposing views of the reason for such problems are boiling over, as it’s become clear that there’s no money in the till to pay for such economically suicidal policies. Yet, each year, the spending worsens and so do the economic conditions for the average citizen.
And this is true whether we see Labour, Tory, Republican, Democrat, Democrata Progresista, or Federalista del Centro in power. At some point, it would be reasonable to expect the average voter to realise that it’s not only the opposition candidate that’s a danger, it’s also his own party’s candidate and, in fact, the entire political system.
What’s interesting is that, in many countries, grumblings can be heard to this effect - that “they’re all corrupt” - yet, immediately after making such statements, the average voter returns to the support of his party’s candidate, as he is “the lesser of two evils.”
And here we see a guiding principle of party politics. Do all you can to create the image of the opposing party as literally evil. Use the media to parrot that concept, on a daily basis. By so doing, it becomes unimportant who you run for office. Your party supporters do not vote for your candidate, they vote against the opposing party’s candidate. And that makes it possible to run a rutabaga for office and still win, if you can succeed in demonising the turnip the other party is running.
In the U.S., political candidacy is practically a national sport. The presidential competition begins as soon as the previous election has ended. (Candidate Hillary Clinton began the “I might be running” charade before the sitting president had been sworn in, in 2013, for his second term.)
In addition to the candidates pouring so much time into campaigning that those who already hold public office abandon their responsibilities in order to focus on the campaign, hundreds of millions of dollars are poured into each campaign. In the current U.S. election race, we observe Mrs. Clinton, a candidate with a dark past who has been described by the majority of American voters as a liar, and as dishonest and untrustworthy - an astonishing revelation until an even more astonishing truth sinks in - that many of those who see her in that light plan to vote for her anyway, in order to stop a Republican - any Republican - from attaining office.
And the Republican side is presently led by Donald Trump, a man famous for his quick temper, boastful comments, bullying presence, and egotistical will, in addition to having a long record of causing massive bankruptcies with his business projects.
Yet, his supporters are equally rabid in their belief that he is desperately needed to counter the dreaded Mrs. Clinton.
It’s hard to imagine that two candidates could be less qualified for public office. We might be forgiven if we conclude that there is no lesser of two evils in equations such as this one. There is only disaster in a red outfit versus disaster in a blue outfit.
In 1796, the young U.S.A. chose between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson for president. Most Americans admired them both and it was a very close election. Both had been founding fathers and both contributed heavily to the cause of freedom that was so valued in the early days of the U.S.
But, in those days, the average American recognised that his freedom depended upon a small government. As Mr. Jefferson rightly stated, “A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take away everything that you have.”
Indeed, the U.S. had come into being as a result of revolution against the government of King George of England, who had the temerity to raise the total tax level to about 2.5%.
But countries do seem always to decline over time. No matter how well-intended the original concept, no matter how productive the people, countries decline, and for the same reasons. Governments (both liberal and conservative) constantly work to grow their own power and to extract as much wealth from their people as they can manage.
As stated at the beginning of this article, “It’s an unfortunate truth that, when people are worried about the future, they often put their faith in politicians to somehow make everything better.” By doing so, they make their own destruction possible.
But what’s one person to do? “You can’t fight City Hall,” as they say. However, in most countries, the U.S. included, it’s still legal to vote with your feet - to move to a different jurisdiction that has not gone so far into decline, where the taxation is low and the level of liberty is high. In any era, there are always jurisdictions that are freer than others. The present era is no exception. In seeking a saviour, we should not put our faith in any politician or group of politicians.
If we have a saviour, he is the man in the mirror. If we are to be saved, we alone must do the research, make the plans, vote with our feet, and establish our own liberty.
* * *
Editor’s Note: The U.S. government is broke and bleeding money. Like most governments that get into financial trouble, we think American politicians will keep choosing the easy option…money printing on a massive scale.
This has tremendous implications for your financial security. These politicians are playing with fire and inviting a currency catastrophe.
Most people have no idea what really happens when a currency collapses, let alone how to prepare…
How will you protect your savings in the event of a currency crisis? This just-released video will show you exactly how. Click here to watch it now.
- 597 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


I wonder why the Mafia had its big meet in Appalachin, New York in 1957. Paris is a much better meeting place for heads of crime families.
Hillary 2016
She hasn't been president yet, so nothing can be blamed on her! She's innocent!
Hooooray!
yeah well, since i'm admitedly prone to messianic thinking .... there's only one hope for our our future - ROBERT DAVID STEELE 2016 ! get on it. make it viral.
(this coming from the guy who was around these parts in 2012 telling anyone who'd listen-
ROCKY! ROCKY! ROCKY!ROCKY! ROCKY! ROCKY!ROCKY! ROCKY! ROCKY!ROCKY! ROCKY!
and robert steele was running then. if you you thought they burried ron paul...i found no mention of steele on any alternative sites until it was all over. been listening for four 4 years now and this guy is the shit. period. the only hope for america there is.
Hillary should start campaigning naked, showing off her 16 pig-teats: 4 for the banks, 4 for the MIC, and 8 for the Clinton Foundation.
What a disgusting pig-bitch! ;-)
Looney
I'll personally shoot anyone caught wanking off to pics of her ovipositor.
Down arrow for the incredibly traumatizing visual image.
I'm fully behind Hillery.
Higher income taxes, higher cap gains taxes, stricter FATCA, moar gubmint jobs and expansion and heftier handouts to the FSA.
What's not to like?
Gawd that is funny! ZH comment of the year award!
Big woop - the one time in her entire pathetic fucking life she's not guilty of something.
They didn't have taxpayer funded winged carbon spewers. However the irony of the time in 1957 would be for all the mafia crime families showing up to the meeting to discuss the evils of tommy guns, casino's and Cadillacs.
There's only one Savior. That's why every year we get That Christmas Feeling >> http://bit.ly/1Ix95Ev
Trump did not endorse this message..
But Hillary did.
The New York Times noted that it reached out to the Clinton campaign “about how to refer to the Democratic presidential candidate,” and on Monday the question was officially answered by the Clinton campaign itself.
No more “Rodham,” says the Clinton camp.
The Associated Press and The Washington Post are also ditching “Rodham” and only referring to the candidate as “Hillary Clinton” from now on.
Clinton grew up in Chicago in a relatively wealthy family and kept her maiden name, in addition to her husband’s name, for decades until her 2016 presidential campaign.
Many of us just call her Hitlery.
Holy fuck that cunt was puked out of her mothers filthy womb....in chicago?
Hill dawg is part of the chicago crime kosher mafia syndicate-family.
No wonder we cannot get rid of her.
She's dug in like an alabama tick.
I wonder. Since both her and trump wear unpleasant looking hair pieces, will we being seeing their hair pieces having their own debates?
I am intrigued but what their hair pieces have seen.
what Thomas is trying to say here in so many words....jives with the upcoming "Mexican Presidential Gringo Shit-Flush of 2016" ( as practiced on the Mexicans every 6-7 years for 70+ yrs by their PRI Party)
Gringos need the appearance of competition (hence the US political duopoly)
Same fucking theme: everything goes to shit...."Oh, the new guy...he'll fix it, I know he will"
I believe things are even worse, the politicians running do not have the power to do much of anything.
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/11/30/the-next-false-flag/
9/11 was a false flag. Without doubt. If you doubt, you have not watched any of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth videos. Scientific evidence, engineering failure analysis, carefully and openly discussed, evidence that the 9/11 commission ignored.
If you still doubt, it only means that you have not studied the evidence. The fact of 9/11 being a false flag operation is far beyond dispute at this point in our country's history. That means we have criminals running our government who will be hung if 9/11 is ever properly investigated. We citizens are desperate for someone to deal with this level of corruption, of domination of the entire system of government outside of our supposedly-free political processes. It is not clear there is any power remaining in our Constitution's institutions, they go through the motions but don't make many of the decisions.
The result is Trump, whose supposed immunity from corruption is the only positive attribute he can boast.
Some mainstream politician needs to understand they can ignore MSM and still win.
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/11/13/why-not-presidential-debat...
Arrest.
Tri.
Convict.
Execute.....
It can be argued that you posted this to marginalize the article.
Any intelligence organization worth its salt would post exactly as you have done (off-topic, widely accepted by the general public as crazy talk, tin-foil hattery, etc).
I presume that you're an agent of a 3-letter .gov agency. Your job is to cast doubt on any article, stated theory, or published opinions that is close to the truth. Distasteful and dishonorable as that behavior is, it's a free country.
We recognize you for what you are.
To avoid marginalizing, keep your comments related directly to the article. There are other places for general discussion and theory exchange.
Tyler, how difficult would it be to track obvious marginalization attempts, and post the "winners" nics (no personal data, just nics)? I can write some code for Chrome to block them. Maybe I'll call it "Propagone" or something cute like that.
To paraphrase an old saying: Respect the gods, then get busy saving your ass. The Ten Commandments were deliberately scrambled. The real order is 1) Don't lie; 2) Don't steal; and 3) Don't murder. If you can't do the first three, the rest don't really matter. However, the problem with organized religion is they don't teach you how to avoid the lies; they don't teach you how to avoid the thieves; and they don't teach you how to avoid being murdered. There's a reason: they'd be exposed. You're on your own, and with cohorts you absolutely trust. Pay attention to exactly who you're doing business with, both directly and indirectly. You may be funding the very group that takes you out.
Savior? No. Arrests? Yes, absolutely!!!
A return to constitutionally limited government to include an end to needless undeclared wars - would do nicely.
Keep the Criminals out of the District of Criminals. Have them meet twice a year like real Founding Fathers used to do. No piece of Legislation longer than five pages.
COG is the cancer agent to free society and direct democracy. You represent yourself, not a man with a fancy suit and some disciplined, well-behaved gimps. Freedom and equality is identical, can't have the one without both. Anti-statism in all representations, capitalistic or communistic is better than voluntary action to lose the right to self-management. Prevention is better than the cure.
It's become a country of free loaders looking for help from a government that is "of the free loaders, by the free loaders, and for the free loaders." It won't end well. Communes in the 1960s failed because of the same free loading.
Call him what you will, but Arnold Schwarzenegger, shortly after he became governor, leaked out that 97% of California's budget was fixed for his full term, leaving him to save the State with 3%.
"Justin Trudeau plans a vast programme of public spending in the face of a declining economy, but hasn’t offered any explanation as to how this can be paid for."
As opposed to the trillion dollar plus annual budget for the pentagon, homeland security, and nuclear weapons, which the government pays for with new debt.
I know a saviour personaly his name is Jesus Christ!
Savior Choice #1: Adam Kokesh.
Savior Choice #2: Nobody.
-----
Choice #1 is a trick answer... unless you already know the Adam Kokesh platform is to dissolve the USSA federal government.
Choice #2 is simply more direct.
-----
Given that "government" is fiction, nothing really changes when the fiction that government dissolves... except in the head of 7-billion delusional human beings who have no freaking clue how to distinguish what is real vs fiction, what exists vs doesn't, what is vs isn't.
To be, or not to be... one important question!
thought the sheep learned in 2008...the hopey-changey, sort of a "god" thing didn't work out well.
Why are there NO comments today??
Nero Hedge: Why are there NO comments today??
....maybe because everyone knows that politicians are serial bullshitterz. They lie to get into position, then they fuck you with no lube. So don't consent to the assrape.
Give me a beer to change the things I can change.
Give me wine to accept the things I can not change.
Forget it, you cant fix it, your just wasting your life.
Go long on debt, buy assets and toys and rural property in a temprate zone.
Have a skill to trade, chickens, fruit trees, garden, self reliant neighbors.
Live long and prosper.
Yea the future generations may be screwed but thats their problem.
Jesus is the savior.
He's a savior who doesn't save us from anything, and his only claim to fame is suffering unjustly under an unjust regime. But didn't you learn anything in Sunday NWO school? Only unfair suffering can lead to salvation.
Jesus saves those he came for from the coming wrath of God. He saves us from ourselves.
No one can save you from yourself. If you want to tear yourself apart, no one can stop you.
Look in the mirror:
"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. 2 People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, 4 treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people."- 2 Timothy 3:1-5
Then when Pistis saw the impiety of the chief ruler, she was filled with anger. She was invisible. She said, "You are mistaken, Samael," (that is, "blind god"). "There is an immortal man of light who has been in existence before you, and who will appear among your modelled forms; he will trample you to scorn, just as potter's clay is pounded. And you will descend to your mother, the abyss, along with those that belong to you. For at the consummation of your (pl.) works, the entire defect that has become visible out of the truth will be abolished, and it will cease to be, and will be like what has never been." Saying this, Pistis revealed her likeness of her greatness in the waters. And so doing, she withdrew up to her light.
The Nag Hammadi is a false Gospel proclaiming exactly what Christ warned about.
You are deceived, you follow a false Christ (Matthew 24) and you love the darkness and hate the light:
"That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched—this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. 2 The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. 3 We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ. 4 We write this to make our[a] joy complete.
Light and Darkness, Sin and Forgiveness
5 This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all. 6 If we claim to have fellowship with him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth. 7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all[b] sin.
8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." 1 John 1:1-10
Jesus didn't warn us about the Nag Hammadi - he warned us about Christians. Pharisees, lawgivers, authoritarians of all stripe and sect.
Any false Christ, any false Gospel, is what he warned against ( Matthew 24:23-5; Mark 13:21; Luke 17:23).
Apocryphal books that disagree with the Canon, written centuries after the Gospels are proclaiming a false Christ as much as modern day charlatans like Joel Osteen are.
All one needs to do is to compare the teachings of Jesus Christ to the teachings of false Christ's- one who pays attention can easily see the difference between the two .
The idea of canon is a myth. There isn't any such thing; there's never been any such thing. The only two things that exist are God - and us.
There's God, His Son, his Word the Bible and His Holy Spirit.
As for the Canon- it takes a study of what is taught in the books of the Canon as opposed to what is written in the books of the apocrypha - the apocrypha, you will find, if you study it carefully, conflicts/disagrees with the canon, while all the 66 books of the Canon do not disagree with one another .
Based on Holy Scripture itself God cannot lie and God is the same now, forever and always- therefore the apocrypha must be rejected .
https://carm.org/why-apocrypha-not-in-bible
Jesus IS 'the Word'
The bible was written and compuled by fallible, biased men.
False?
http://www.essene.com/Gospels/GnosticAndSophia.html
Nope.
No matter how many bible quotes you unpack...
February 2003 AOM: Moses and Akhenaten one and the same person
https://grahamhancock.com/moses-akhenaten-same-person-osman/
Akhenhaten and Moses
http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-near-e...
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/belief.html
Jesus of Nazareth spoke Aramaic and was very likely an Essene.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/jae/jae03.htm
You worship a book rather than The Christ. I dont see how you are "Christian" at all, myself.
But you really, honestly don't seem to understand the origins of your rigid dogmatism
****
Sourcing the Legend: The Syncretic Heritage of Christianity
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/source.html
****
This is news? Moses was raised by Pharaoh's daughter- duh yuh thunk she might have given him an Egyptian name?
Since Aramaic was the prevalent language in "Iaudea" (Judea) at that time- do you think it is a surprise that He spoke Aramaic?
The Essenes were a latter cult that followed a false Gospel- an Apocryphal one.
They made really good sprout bread, though. I buy it at the organic store on occasion.
Please read the links unfamiliar to you, ST.
You should also do some more research on the essenes, particularly their opposition to and persecution by the pharisees.
As I recall, JofN devoted some time in your "canon" to admonishing the pharisees, the creators of modern rabbinical judahism.
The Truth... Is not what you think it is.
I can promise you that much. ;)
You assume you know my background and studies way more than you should.
I understand very well what the synagogue of Satan is (Revelation 2:9; 3:9).
Don't assume- as they say, it makes an a*s of u and me.
Your comment above shows you are relying on the bible for your knowledge of egypt.
Read the links or don't, but its clear you dont know much about egypt.
That you take the bible as history is batshit crazy and does tend to show you are unwilling to consider COPIOUS evidence of its errors and omissions.
The moses story was written down centuries after moses was supposed to have lived.
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/egypt.htm
The bible is not anything like accurate or reliable history.
But if youre insane enough to think that believing that it is makes it so, DESPITE ALL THE EVIDENCE OTHERWISE, then you are absolutely too stupid to learn the truth even if you had a thirst for it - which you do not.
You simply want to conflate your illogical belief as such *with* truth. This is wholly irrational.
But so is your reply. You tell me not to assume what you know as you prove you dont know anything about Egypt or archaeology.
You just have a magic book, and the lie you live in, packed with verses like a hoarder's cats, and you lack the capacity to **think** about your own beliefs.
Faith is not knowledge.
It is an excuse to avoid seeking knoweledge at all.
Ah, millenarianism. Gotta love it.
I betcha that most preppers are religious.
The real reason we should eradicate these faith cults is because they almost unanimously desire the end of the world, in order that their Afterlife can begin. That doesn't make for a very healthy or humanist civic society.
On a long enough timeline- the afterlife begins for all of us.
On the day you die- you will either be owned by the true God that Jesus Christ proclaimed- or you will be owned by Satan.
On the day you die- you get to spend eternity with the one you are owned by.
Liar. Nothing so good as that could ever happen.
You believe it.
But what you believe has no basis in the truth.
None.
Read the links on akhenhaten - its apparently not what you think.
Salvation is just around the corner. TTIP and TPP will save us from the tweedledee and tweedledum duopoly of parties putting those in charge whoe have been calling the shots behind the curtains = the multi-national mega-corporations, mainly incorporated in Delaware. Government charging more taxes - they due. Government banning a toxin - they sue. Government not mandating a purchase (smoke alarm) - they (insurances) sue.
Send Congress home and house the homeless in the WH. Corporate rule supercedes their usefullness.
Jesus Christ!
Knock this Jesus shit off!
Jesus could give a flying fuck about what nonsense is going on in the world.
OK pal?
If he DID care, his nappy ass would be down here straightening shit out quick. Yes?
SO FUCKING PRAY YOUR ASS OFF THAT HE COMES, OR HIS DAD DOES, AND ENDS THIS SHIT DOWN HERE.
OK Jesus lover? GET YER BOI HERE!
"Justin Trudeau plans a vast programme of public spending in the face of a declining economy, but hasn’t offered any explanation as to how this can be paid for."
I'm always amused when someone appears not to understand how fiat money works.
Also, people are waking up to the severe wealth and income inequalities. Progressive taxation is the answer, and many people are beginning to understand that.
If you worry that might kill the economy, remember that in the 1950s the top U.S. tax rate was over 92%, and it was one of the most prosperous decades of the 20th century. The conservatives and libertarians are dead wrong on taxes.
We may or may not be wrong on taxing people at 90% in both moral and economic turns, but your last paragraph is a wholly specious argument as to 'why.'
There are a large number of differences between circumstances now and 75 years ago - from debt to manufacturing to global competition and on and on.
After both ww1 and 2, for another matter, the us had a significant advantage not having been reduced to rubble.
right now about ten cents of every dollar of revenue goes to pay interest on federal debt. That will climb and climb, faster and faster.
Massive taxation does not guarantee sunshine, puppy dogs, and free ice cream for the working class, and the wealthy have far more options today than in the past for hiding and moving money around internationally.
That said - I think a 50% 1 time tax on billionaires for schools and job retraining, or some sort of tax grab on the 0.1% is reasonable and commie or not - this country needs a much better educated public, nit millions of unskilled immigrants, to survive.
Call it nationalist libertarianism or call it socialism but it is absurd to have people with billions of dollars as this country slides in the shitter.
Sometimes orthodoxy becomes counter-productive to the overall goals at the margins...
I have a savior and that is Jesus Christ.
Our time on earth is short, repent your sins and follow Jesus.
It is all a dog and pony show but there is something about Trump that I like. When you have to sit down at the table with Putin who do you want there? Would you like Trump or Hillary? I know who I would pick. Trump would probably make an offer to buy the Kremlin and try to declare bankruptcy in Russia. All joking aside, if I had to guess who Putin most fears it would be Trump. I think foreign policy has really went to shit and Hillary has proven that she is terrible at that responsibility and that is basically your ownly job as US President. We all know who runs the world and they are called BANKS.
There are world leaders who won't even meet with Obama. It used to be that it was a big deal if the United States President was coming to visit a foreign country. Now no one even gives a shit. "Just go park your two Air Force Ones over in the back lot. It's a little muddy. Can I see your passsports and visas? We will need a payment for the parking of the planes in advance. Sorry for the inconvenience."
What difference does it make who is President? For any candidate I would ask this question, "Who are you going to appoint to your cabinet if elected?". That would tell us everything that we need to know but no one ever asks that question of any candidate. You all know as well as I do that there are already people picked for those positions well ahead of time. Well, who are they? I wonder how many of these appointees overlap candidates and even party lines? Talk a bout a turd in the punchbowl.
Don't put the appointee cart before the horse just yet.
Though some of the major positions are well considered, I have not been approached, vetted or even been aware of, a good Czar position for me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._executive_branch_czars
Except maybe Carp Czar, which despite its many meanings , I can give a stellar performance.
Trump takes 15 television hours to fill a single job opening. There are almost 5,000 presidentially appointed poistions to be vetted and nominated between the November elections and the early months of a new administration. It would take a 30 year Trump administration just to fill all those positions.
Oh, they'll get their "savior" alright 1010011010..........................
Let me propose a solution for those disgusted with the political situation in Homeland and who want to walk to a new PROMISED LAND :
Head for Greenland, the rate at which the permafrost and iceberg cap is disappearing will free that land of its Polar Bears and Penguins and make it reveal under climate change what its "phony" name, invented by the Vikings, has concealed for a thousand years ! : a new GREEN continent full of methane gas under the permafrost cushion.
But I'm sure that wont be a probem as most of the frustrated libertarians feel that climate change is as phony as Obamacare and Al Gore's book. So methane is pure FREE air.
Halleluiah, the promised land.
Now that is called a "win win" solution!
Moved.