This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Why Some Are Questioning The Zuckerberg Charity Story
This week not only did social media come a buzz, so too did the main stream when it was announced Mark Zuckerberg and his wife were marking the occasion of the birth of their child by starting a philanthropic organization named in their child’s honor. They also declared they pledged to give 99% of their Facebook™ shares (worth some $45 Billion) to help fund its mission. Yet, one little item or detail seemed not to go unnoticed by some (which I am of this crowd.) Rather, it stood out like a sore thumb. That detail was: rather than what is typically structured as a nonprofit (i.e., what one expects to see and is traditionally administered when charity is involved) this “Initiative” was structured as an LLC. i.e., Can be used for both profit and maybe more importantly – political influence.
Here is a quote from the Facebook post they wrote to help illustrate their intentions. It was this passage which both caught my eye, as well as made me think deeper as to just what didn’t sit squarely in my mind at first take. To wit:
“The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative is structured as an LLC rather than a traditional foundation. This enables us to pursue our mission by funding non-profit organizations, making private investments and participating in policy debates — in each case with the goal of generating a positive impact in areas of great need. Any net profits from investments will also be used to advance this mission.”
The line “making private investments and participating in policy debates” sounds innocuous enough. However, most (if not all) of those who spend their every waking moment glued to social media wondering if they too can keep up to this weeks misanthropic escapades of the Kardashian’s are the first to take to Facebook and any other social media outlet and bash, excoriate, and what ever else can be thrown around to pummel any Wall Street Billionaire or for that matter Billionaires in general from influencing public policy. Unless you’re deemed “their Billionaire.” Then have at it; as hard, as messy, and/or dirty as you like. Blindfolds will be supplied freely to blind-eyes everywhere.
Do not let this point be lost. If one thinks for a nanosecond people with enormous wealth don’t factor such things into any form of estate planning as well as everyday living planning – I have some ocean front property here in Kentucky you can have at a discount.
Why do I say such a thing? Well, I’ll use one of the most overused examples of “Look it’s not like I’m trying to skirt something I’m actually glad to pay” known to the wealthy as to show “Hey, I’m just one of you with a bigger bank balance by golly, gee whiz.” Again, from the same post as above, to wit:
“By using an LLC instead of a traditional foundation, we receive no tax benefit from transferring our shares to the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, but we gain flexibility to execute our mission more effectively. In fact, if we transferred our shares to a traditional foundation, then we would have received an immediate tax benefit, but by using an LLC we do not. And just like everyone else, we will pay capital gains taxes when our shares are sold by the LLC.”
And there’s that inference again that I pointed out in the first that made me think deeper. Or, as some might say, “Made me go hmmm.” That inference? “…but we gain flexibility to execute our mission more effectively.” I’ll construe: in a world that is driven by politics and political donations – I bet it does. And will.
Again, let me remind you, this is all conjecture on my part. However, like I stated earlier, I’m not the only (although one of the few) that feels there’s more to all this than what’s been bandied about by the main stream media et al.
Two examples of such “heart-fullness” voiced were the immediate comparisons to the philanthropy of both Warren Buffett and Bill Gates. Many of the observations posited by the media was how Mark (I’m using the personal’s only for ease) has seen the value in sharing ones wealth and all the good it can do, and wants to do the same. It’s a fair point. However, I’ll posit there are a few other additional points no one likes to point out. Yet, that doesn’t mean they aren’t there.
Let’s take Warren for one. What’s lost on the general public (as well as many others) is the obvious double standard of how he is both viewed as well as reported on in the press. He too is giving all his fortune away. Makes for great press and keeps him in that almost blinding limelight of ole “Uncle Warren” when he’s doing or making any type of investment or doling out advice. He gives political causes great sound bites or quote lines similar to “I need to pay more taxes!” and more. Yet…
When it comes to those taxes on lower wage earners or the outright cost of employing people who need to pay them. It’s a far different tune. All that you saw reported nearly ad nausea during that period was what seemed like a video loop stuck on continuous play. That or footage of him playing the ukulele surrounded by the Fruit Of The Loom™ ensemble belting out tunes at his investor meeting. What you didn’t see reported anywhere (for there was no warning as per the story) was a complete Fruit Of The Loom factory that had been the mainstay of an area in Kentucky for decades: closed and all its textile operations sent to Honduras leaving hundreds unemployed. Good jobs at good wages. Only not here, that’s too expensive. There now in Honduras.
Another example would be how you never see ole “Uncle Warren” demonized for the sin of all sins: being connected with fossil fuels. e.g., Oil.
Koch Brothers and a pipeline? Vilified as a scourge or pariah on the Earth. (I’m not taking a side nor endorsing one side or the other. I’m simply pointing out a demonstrable difference as viewed via the light of the media and reports – nothing more. Use you’re own insight as to ascertain any meaning or not) Warren’s investment into the trains which carry that same oil that seemed to derail weekly for a time causing environmental catastrophes? If his name was mentioned is was at a whispers breath. If that. But hey – He’s giving away all his Billions – He’s one of the good guy’s. Not some greedy capitalist. Right?
Then there’s Bill Gates as of late. Again, his foundation may be doing great work. Yet then again, it doesn’t hurt to make sure you profess as loud and as much as possible: “Hey, I’m giving everything away, don’t think or call me some greedy capitalist.” i.e., Hey, go after those people’s money – not mine. I’m one of you! See!!”
It has been reported that he’s publicly stated to have taken all his philanthropy cues from Warren for they have been very close friends for years now. But Gates has done something even more head scratching than even Buffett. Lately Gates has publicly stated that it’s going to take both socialism and climate change advocates favorite tax (e.g., a carbon tax) to solve the ills of the world. Calling the private sector “inept.”
Nothing like self inoculating oneself with the right combo of political antibodies once one’s made their wealth via capitalism. Especially if one wants to keep both its use, as well as their new-found media persona intact. Kills two birds with one stone is all I’ll say. Almost like going for a political flu shot and receiving a double dose on the house. Again, all conjecture on my part, however, does one think for a moment Bill would say such things when he was developing privately what Microsoft™ was able to do for the public sector at large? That’s a decision for you to ponder and come to your own conclusions.
Which brings us back to Zuck and his latest philanthropic proclamation. As Gates learned and emulated Warren with his own brand of philanthropy. So too must Mark be watching and learning also. I may be critical of Zuck on many differing issues , but what I would never imply is that he is not a shrewd businessman. He’s demonstrated that in spades. Which by the way is exactly the basis for why as I stated at the beginning I’m not quite buying what’s being sold.
I also believe it is exactly for these reasons one should look for clues as to what might be on the horizon in other ways. For this could portend or, be a precursor that those “storm clouds” myself and a few others have been sighting are indeed becoming more obvious to Silicon Valley than many will let on. Here’s my reasoning…
You know the one thing Mark Zuckerberg with all his Billions can’t do today without causing a media sensation throughout Wall Street? Hint: Sell.
Let me express it this way: How would you think it would look to analysts, the financial media, stockholders, et al if Zuck announced he too decided to sell a Billion $dollars worth of stock when only weeks ago it was reported Mark Andreessen sold out nearly all (73%) his holdings in Facebook? This coming on the heels of the August 24th historic plunge in the markets. Think it would be seen in a “favorable” light? Neither do I.
You know what else an observant business Silicon Valley person might contemplate?
If we were in fact at the edge of a bubble in the Valley – how would one be able to sell at the top without bringing on some negative feedback loop in their stock price? After all, if history is any guide part of the problem for many during the dot-com burst was they never sold at the top. Many rode it all the way down to oblivion, and only a choice few (like Gates) made it through.
However, Bill had an operating system that was needed regardless of the economy’s state. Mark only has an operating platform that needs to sell ads. And if ads go dry – so too does your stock value and personal wealth. See AOL™ for clues.
With this newly formed “Initiative” any selling is now wrapped into a wonderful meme of “We’re not selling to profit. (or preserve) It’s for charity. And we’ve stated openly we were going to do just that. So, nothing to see here, please move along, thanks so much.”
Are you beginning to see why something seemed “more than what meets the eye” at first blush?
You know what else might be on the horizon that I’m more than sure will be brought up if things do begin to turn sour in the Valley? Mark’s near unrestricted power of authority to make acquisitions.
Right now he doesn’t need Board approval to spend. He’s been very shrewd in keeping that ability solely within his own purview. However, as I’ve written many times previous, “You’ll know everything in the Valley has changed once you see Wall Street calling for that oversight.” I believe that ship has already began to sail and will be coming much sooner than later if we have more hiccups like the one’s we saw in Aug. or if Facebook shares begin going the wrong way.
Yet, you know where that privilege will probably remain, unfettered, as well as with more influencing authority? Hint: “Initiative.”
Look, I’m fully aware this is a lot of conjecture, as well as speculation and more on my part. I’m also of the belief that there is truly some real intention to do good with one’s wealth. Especially once one has a child for it really does change perspective on everything you never would contemplate until. That said, I’m also of fact and well aware that there is nothing wrong with capitalizing on events no matter how they present themselves in manners, and ways, as to promote or protect one’s wealth. As well as image.
What caught my eye was, again – the structure. e.g. LLC. It was once you ask a few question and ponder “why” while looking at the event horizon that only a very few of us are stating or trying to bring attention as it nears does one look closer at what might also be driving the reasoning behind such announcements.
Yes, it may be a wonderful vehicle for charity in the name of his daughter. And – it might also be a tell-tale vehicle for those willing to look as the first sign of a vehicle trying to “get-out-of-Dodge” before or, as fast as time will allow without causing others to panic first clogging the exits leaving themselves stuck. After all, what’s one to think about the “eyeball for ads” business when one of the other undisputed “eyeball” counted sights Yahoo™ is openly contemplating this weekend if it should sell its internet business?
Remember, also, this year is the first year that the once Holy Grail of “IPO’s to the promised land” have been mired in quicksand. (Just look at Square™ and Match™ for the latest clues) Funny how things like this happen when there’s no longer QE to fuel it. That, and the Federal Reserve has all but declared without question that a rate hike will in fact take place (unless they don’t) nearly forsaking corporate profits to $Dollar denominated purgatory.
Again this exercise could all be for naught and there may be nothing to ponder or, extrapolate. And Mark, Bill, and Warren may indeed have no ulterior motives to their philanthropic activities other than what they’ve stated. And that’s fine with me. Yet, there’s two sayings I’ve lived by most of my adult business life that have served me well. The first comes from Andrew Carnegie, “I no longer listen to what men say – I watch what they do.” The second I learned on my own after being blindsided by someone I thought was a friend, “It’s not what people do too you that’s the problem. It’s the way you have to treat everybody coming after that’s the problem.”
If you think the Carnegie quote is just some antiquated insight that no longer fits today’s circumstances or maybe can’t see how the second could apply to the circumstances of today. Need I remind you of another person who had philanthropy at the core of their decisions of just “doing good” where his actions were to be taken beyond reproach? Lance Armstrong.
Questioning is a prudent exercise regardless of the individual. Especially when they’ve proclaimed politics is going to be one of their predominate activities. For if it’s a business – I don’t have to buy or participate. When it’s political – I might not have a choice.
Charitable or not.
- 15 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


Zuckerfuck, the crony communist.
Just remember everybody has an angle, including me and you...if you deny that then you are a fool.
When dealing with one named Zuckerberg, it is wise to question everything.
It is when you generalize, you fall into the pit Bach. How about Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Ford, Rockerfeller, Obama, Bush, etc
Not ALL of them are Jews...come on man, there is plenty of room for all the assholes out there, a lot of Jews included.
A CIA cooked Zionist. Is that better?
I cant stand that motherzuckerberg....I dont know how the Jews do it but they keep making new rules for themselves that applies only for them and the watchdogs just turn a blind eye to it......a foundation that can get away with anything??? yeah well they are already getting away with everything in the financial industry, just look at Carl Icahn, Steven A Cohen, Bill Ackman..all these fuckers got away with insider trading while a couple of indians took the bait..Maybe I should contact Weinstein, Katzenberg and Rosen LLP and ask how I can sue. And it definitely helps when the Zio controlled MSM keeps spinning things positively and saying how generous that motherzuckerberg is. this world is a fuckin joke...only person whose actions make any sense nowadays is Putin.
And Fester, I aint hopping on this bandwagon, I have been on it for half my life because I opened my eyes to figure out what dont make sense.
who cant see this is just a tax dodge?
You do know that you can put all your billions inside a special trust, give that money away when you pass, but in the meantime have the trust buy life insurance for the heirs (which they will get tax free), right? All this BS Warren Buffett and the rest of the asshats spew about giving away 99% of their wealth is BS. They will give it away, but they supplement it with life insurance policy that preserves their wealth. And not only that, you get to take a write off over 5 years for the money you stick in the trust. So we actually end up paying for this splendid little loophole.
I'm not entitled to their wealth, and while it can be argued that neither are they, I'm honest and will not destroy my word by taking illegitimate funds.
The only thing me taking their stuff will do is prove that we are no better. Let them have their ill-gotten gains. All we have to do is stop taking US Federal Reserve notes to make them poor again. This shit is literally that simple.
Do you understand our goal now? You win simply by changing the game and not letting them join. It's our game after all, we allowed it to happen here, and as far as I am concerned Jewburgs money isn't wanted in my shop. I only take money from European people and those that are allied with European causes... The rest of them can buy my goods second hand if they can find them, or simply do without. I don't do direct sales, and I don't sell to just anyone.
That's how I run my shop here. That is how I expect everyone to run their shop.
Just like the heroic CEO who pledges to only have $1 in salary for several years...
and just happens to not mention that by doing so they pay $0 income tax, $0 in social security and medicare tax and automatically get bumped into the lowest tax bracket for "non-earned income".
Works for pro ballers, why not pro ball zuckers (zee what i did zere?), but how do you write it off, if it's an LLC and not a 501c3?
Yep, and I can't stop laughing at the people who slam Zuck for this while ignoring the Koch brothers doing the same shit up the road because it suits their so-called ideologies.
It's kinda sad to watch people hop on the "I hate jews" band wagon.
Pro tip: Don't hate anyone unless you know them and hate them for a real reason. Don't let your family, the media, the .gov...don't let anybody tell YOU to hate.
Pro tip #2: People hate for 1 of 3 reasons.
a. Fear
b. Envy
c. Self loathing
Fester
A big + 1
Hatred is an emotion that causes incredible damage, especially for the hater even more than the hatee (word?).
You forgot one:
d. injustice
That is the one the western world has trouble grasping.
Before i choose an arrow and any rebuttal or confirmation...define your injustice quintago?
It's not mine, it's what others perceive. Double standards in the levant don't necessarily help.
is it equal justice under the law or social justice? if social justice, that is a buzz word for communism.
I know you don't mean the US then, where justice is anything but "equal" and the law is for sale, as long as we're on meaningless buzzwords even sub-sapient simians can grasp with their little opposable thumbs.
That is the truth right there Fester.
It is not a donation and it is not a charity if you still control the money.
Didn't Zuckerfag give the keynote at the Bilderberg meeting in 2011? He's one of them now. I know exactly the type of "policy changes" he's going to fund: the elistist, statist, and globalist kind.
From the guy who defrauded investors on the IPO then ran off to Europe to stiff waiters in Italy.
I don't trust at all, neither should you.
lol
Zark MuckRakerBerg Foundation for "Just Us"
Check this legitimate ways to mak? money from home, working on your own time and being your own boss... Join the many successful people who have already used the system. Only reliable internet connection needed, no prior experience neccessary, that's why where are here. Start here... www.wallstreet34.com
Zuck, Warren B and Gates are all just rich SNAKES IN THE GRASS. Lookin' out for No. 1.
Beware.
There's probably a bigger whore than Zuckerberg, but I can't remember the name.
Mark Fuckerburg - What a Big Brother loving piece of shit this guy is. Fuck him and his bullshit Assface cult.
This is what oligarchs do.
Set up tax free trusts.
Why are you surprised?
I'm vexed by the outrage.
>With this newly formed “Initiative” any selling is now
>wrapped into a wonderful meme of “We’re not selling
>to profit. (or preserve) It’s for charity. ... nothing to
>see here, please move along, thanks so much.”
LOL, very good. Generally, funding as an LLC makes sense if he thinks the value is only going down from here, otherwise the ongoing tax issues would make it crazy.
Not that he should care, what if 1/3 of it ends up going for taxes over the next 30 years, so what?
Jew can't give money away even a dead one.
Zuckerberg seems like the one who will be seen hanged at the gas station while the others get away.
I feel like the elites would off him and seize Facebook.
Damn, I keep forgetting to sign up for Mark Fuckerberg's site.
This smells a lot like Hillary! "saving the Haitians" through her foundation. I wonder what pay-for-play mineral rights he's after.
I should have mentioned the Clintons as well in my above remark about rich snakes in the grass..., looking out for Numero Uno.
And Hillary smells a lot like Mother Theresa. Mother Theresa would do a photo op with anyone who'd give her a donation, including the Duvaliers of Haiti.
But the authors say the problem is not a lack of money, as the foundation created by Mother Teresa has raised hundred of millions of pounds.They also say that following numerous natural disasters in India she offered prayers and medallions of the Virgin Mary but no direct or monetary aid.
But she accepted the Legion of Honour and a grant from the Duvalier dictatorship in Haiti, said prof Larivee, and although millions of dollars were transferred to the various bank accounts, most of the accounts were kept secret.
Dr Larivie says: 'Given the parsimonious management of Mother Teresa's works, one may ask where the millions of dollars for the poorest of the poor have gone?'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2287427/Was-Mother-Teresa-saintl...
OR as Mark Twain said,
“Give a man a reputation as an early riser and he can sleep 'til noon.”I'm sure he got a nice quiet payout from the gov intel agencies when they took control.
Huh. Rich Jewboy Zuckerberg care for the poor. Which fucktard will believe this?
"And just like everyone else, we will pay capital gains taxes when our shares are sold by the LLC." Well that's safe to say as it can never happen. The membership interests in the LLC (not "shares" but that's a minor quibble) are owned by the members, presumably the two who created the company, and only those who own something may sell it. So the "shares" they presumably mean are the shares in FB they will transfer to the LLC When those are later sold by the LLC it would be income to the company that I believe would be passed through to the Zs but if they contributed them at current values and those then decline I believe they would then have loss and not a gain.
Not being a CPA I could be wrong about this so if anyone out there knows more, chime in. LDF
There has to be a "profit" in order to create income to pass through to the LLC's members for them to pay taxes on. If they go the Larry Ellison/NSA route, then the the shares would would be used as collateral for cash to cover expenses (everything from babysitting to buying others' babies to sacrifice to Mamon to buying votes of congress critters) at an almost-ZIRP carrying cost. So when (potentially) appreciated shares are sold at a future date, any gain on the shares is first applied to cover the previous expenses, and only if the LLC sells shares in excess of its operating costs is there any sort of "profit" or tax obligation that flows through to the LLC's members , and if the shares are liquidated at a loss, then no taxes are due.
So the lying oligarch quote of the day is "And just like everyone else, we will pay capital gains taxes when our shares are sold by the LLC.”
The world would be such a better place without Facebook.
I'm not smart enough to spot trends, but I find it hard to believe so many people will be checking their Facebook page in 5 years. The friends that I know that have facebook are tired of the whole social media shit show.
Some people deep-down may be envious of Zuckerberg's success, so they criticize any sign of philanthropy coming from him.
On the other hand, socialists hate charity because they don't believe it can exist in good faith. That is why they advocate for forced taxing. Socialists and communists think human nature is not kind, and they believe, for whatever strange reason, that governments with their unlimited taxing power are the only ones that can do good.
Whoosh.
The other advantage to an LLC vs. a more traditional charity like a 401(c)(3), is that an LLC can make political donations directly to candidates or parties. This way, Zuckerberg can pretend to be Mother Teresa while acting like the Koch brothers.
And speaking of big money grifts, how is the Clinton Foundation set up? When you see what Bill & Hillary have done with their "non-profit charity," and how stupendously they have enriched themselves since Bill was laughed out of office, the term "slush fund" seems more appropriate. You know, like the charity Bebe Rebozo set up for Dick Nixon?
Facebook was created by a Deep State money through In Q Tel. Zuckerburg had no original ideas, he simply benefited from the desire of Deep State actors to seize the internet. Remember Friendster and MySpace? Destroyed by propaganda campaigns about Pedos and molesters and the evils of an unfettered internet. Replaced by doucheboy and his CIA factbook of United States dipshits.
Google is also a creature of the Deep State, which is why Google execs can print themselves money at will by creating stock and not suffering value loss. Google's "filter bubbles" are the first step in isolating people on the internet from each other and stopping conversations.
The day Facebook would go bankrupt would be a great day for society.
I SO FREAKING HATE THAT SITE!!!!!!!!!
I now even have a escalating discussion with my sister in law BECAUSE I NEVER REPLIED ON HER POSTS OR GAVE LIKES!!!
Fuck that! I never even read them in the first place!!
This weekend my brother even showed up that they won't come to the christmass dinner because of that! She doesn't feel like she's accepted by the family!
And because all that crap, I had to call my parents, my sister and we had a sit down to talk it over. Thank god they all had enough good sence to decide just like me that if they don't want to come over for that reason, well, that they may stay home.
FOR FUCKING STUPID LIKES ON FACEBOOK!!!
Is there a price you get for likes? Does it make you money???
NO!!! And nobody gives a fuck either about your likes!!
Suckerfag is like the dumbest douche nozzle ever. There is a good reason why you never see the guy speaking publicly...it is because he is a moron and can hardly string two coherent sentences together.
If not for the fact he stole the code and the idea for the site from the people that hired him to work on it, he would be working at a Starbucks (maybe)
I see that he and the Asian guy he is married to have a young child now... nice... taking down the gene pools IQ, one child at a time...
<<he would be working at a Starbucks (maybe)>>
Only if the rumours are not true, that Zuckerberg (lit. "sugar-mountain") is the grandson of David Rockefeller. I am unable to verify this, but the few articles I've seen asking the question as to how his useless little 'garage' enterprise was able to suddenly morph into the financial giant it is today, refer to this rumour. (But they are not sources I would think reliable, just rumour mills like Reddit.) Would appreciate a yes or no from anyone who knows. It's not that important, but since this article is about that little wannabe, figured I may as well ask the question that's in my mind whenever I see his name: Is he a Rockefeller, or not.
It's not like Facebook pays a dividend. So how will this LLC fund itself other than selling the stock or selling the calls?
Looks like what happens when someone wants to offload their massive share position when they also run the company.
Who would put it beyond the zuckerbergs to short their company while still running it into the ground?
That sound is the bubble popping.
Zuckerberg is Wall Street's perfect icon.
Willing to sell out their mother to the highest bidder.
This is like uncle Buffet and uncle Gates. They are giving away money as fast as they can yet they seem to have more money than ever.
z's stunt will show up eventually
r
because he is a worthless peice of shit..................i bet he sucks saudi cock after it just came out the ass of a top cia official
Zucker is bailing out of FB stock, while retaining full control over the company and this is a ploy to sell this move without arousing suspicions that his useless piece of shit of company he smeared all over our faces is simply worthless. Only billion gullible FB morons can take his charity utterances for a fact.
All those psychotic, cash bloated, inbred retards and Wall Street perverts, in their wet Ponzi dream are fornicating with those mentally challenged Silicon Valley megalomaniacs, like him , squirting “green” feces off their rotten minds onto faces of hard working US taxpayers, during their cerebral herpes induced seizures of sick imagination, calling it creative disruption.
We see today numerous examples of their creative destruction of young minds, cartoon characters like him are guilty of.
Interesting take on those parasites of reasonable mind I found at:
https://sostratusworks.wordpress.com/2015/01/08/smell-of-silicon-madness/
and about programmatic disruption of our sanity by SV perverts:
https://sostratusworks.wordpress.com/2015/10/18/the-age-of-disruption/
What I hate is the guy really doesn't have billions of dollars. He has shares that could be worth billions if he sells them based on what what street claims they are worth.
In reality the shares are worth ZERO because Facebook doesn't really make any money.
Bingo - that's more my thinking as to why he did this. He wanted to quickly transfer moeny from "paper" to something a little more tangible (still a lot of paper, but liquid).
I think this is just a "save my FACEBOOK billions" scheme and nothing more.
Nice to see this getting MSM play time. Maybe there's hope if all MSM start pointing out the 1% behind the scenes shenanigans. We humble folks find it hard to believe that an individual with so much wealth is actually moved to try to find a vehicle to keep it ALL. I guess that's why I'll always be poor. I would have gave it all away before contacting my tax attorneys to figure out the best way to stash and horde all that sweet, sweet stock market, day-trader money before the top pops off this NSA endorsed money making machine.
The greedy, filthy rich will give an answer one day. It won't be pretty. There will NOT be a wall of attorneys to sheild them from the judge. There will be no bail. May God have mercy on their wicked souls.
Zuck FuckerBERG!
Kikes do noting for free. There is always a string or self-serving interest attached.
Fuck Kikerburg and fuck his website! Will NEVER use it.
Have pity!
As you are dumb!
Churches and charities do not pay tax!
Only that!
So only that!
hehe.
He's a Jew.
A thief and a liar.
End of discussion.