This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
New Photo Emerges Of California Mass Shooters Entering The US
On Friday, the world got its first look at Tashfeen Malik who, along with her husband Syed Rizwan Farook, stormed a San Bernardino county employee holiday party killing 14 and wounding 21.
Here is her Pakistan ID card:
Both suspects were killed in a subsequent shootout with police and in the wake of the tragedy, the FBI revealed that Malik pledged allegiance to ISIS leader Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook while the attack was in progress.
We documented what’s known about Malik’s past on Saturday. Here’s a brief recap:
As Reuters reports, Malik “was from Karor Lal Esan, a city on the west coast of the Indus River in southern Punjab province.” She had been living in Saudi Arabia with her father for 25 years. Pakistani officials note that “the area in Punjab where she spent her early years and later went to university is a 'recruitment ground' and stronghold of Islamist groups with ties to al Qaeda.”
The LA Times calls Malik's family "educated [and] politically influential." "Residents said the Aulakh family is known to have connections to militant Islam," the paper continues before citing a local as saying that "the family has some extremist credentials," whatever that means.
In any event, when her father moved to Saudi Arabia, “he changed a lot,” Malik's uncle, Javed Rabbani, says. "When relatives visited him, they would come back and tell us how conservative and hardline he had become.” Reuters goes on to say that the Saudi government had no information linking her to terrorist organizations.
Farook brought Malik back to the US after marrying her in Saudi Arabia. On Monday, ABC released a picture taken as the couple moved through customs at Chicago O’Hare on July 27, 2014. Here's the image:
While Malik looks similar to the other images that have made the rounds, Farook's appearance differs rather noticeably from the DMV picture circulated last week.
While we were the first to mock co-workers' contention that Farook's radicalization could be confirmed by the size of his beard, we would note that although you cannot judge a book by its cover, it does indeed appear as though some manner of transformation might have taken place in or around Farook's two visits to Saudi Arabia. Indeed, US authorities now say that "initial evidence gathered by counterterrorism investigators suggests Ms. Malik may have had a stronger bond than her husband to jihadist ideology," WSJ reports.
It's "a very real possibility" the attack was instigated by Malik, unnamed officials say, adding the Farook was just a man "looking for answers."
Maybe. Or maybe it's just more convenient to blame the "radical" Saudi/Pakistani wife than it is to admit that a Chicago-born public health inspector was so disillusioned with his life in America that he turned to radical Islam before embarking on a murderous rampage.
»
- 35 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Where is the NSA, TSA,CIA, or FBI?!?!?!? Trillions spent on this "war on terror"!?!?!?!?
I want a fucking refund!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You'll get that in the form of a SS check when you retire at 97(wink). Now go to the back of the line...
God she is ugly. No wonder she wore a tent.
tent.. LOL
I thought it was a tarp.
Such a lovely couple... they will surely be a valuable addition to the community and make great patsies.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-06/san-bernardino-attack-eye-witness-three-tall-white-men-did-it
How many acts of terror can Muslim's carry out in your country if they are not allowed in?
"God she is ugly. No wonder she wore a tent. "
She? That's a he. No wonder Farook flipped out. He got what he thought was his "wife" home, his "wife" took off "her" burka after they got in bed, and boom... "WHAT THE HELL IS THAT THING POKING ME?!?!?!? ALLAH DAMN YOU!!!!" It just got worse from there.
I'd hit it.
With a bat.
Mitzvah.
FORWARD SOVIET JIHAD!
This is what a Central Florida Sheriff wants all his citizens to do about it...
Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey in his own words.
DaddyO
Witness:
One man and one child wearing tactical gear and masks did the shooting.
The child no so much.
What concerns me most about this incident is that it is the perfect excuse for conservatives to attack the vast majority of moderate muslims as 'terrorists'. We must not give into isalamaphobia, and rememebr that the majority of muslims are peaceful hardworking people.
.... aaaaaand, there we go! The moment a terror attack is carried out, liberals turn around and try to slam conservatives.
<=== Look Like Terrorists ???
<=== Look Like Common "Folks"(Oilbama's Fav Word) ???
2 perfect patsies
Does she get 27 virgins? It would serve her right to get 27 guys who don't know what they doing and prematurely ejaculate.
FWIW I hereby predict that the beard trendy thing among American males is OVER.
It was fucking stupid anyway.
Where's their caps and gowns pictures?
you mean like Laquan's ?
" We non-vetted some folks. "
You've fallen prey to the concept of al-Taqiyya.
Islam says it is okay to lie to non-believers.
Islam is not peaceful.
Learn the truth before it is too late.
"maybe it's just more convenient to blame the "radical" Saudi/Pakistani wife than it is to admit that a Chicago-born public health inspector was so disillusioned with his life in America that he turned to radical Islam before embarking on a murderous rampage."
The real disillusionment came after Tashfeen Malik took her burqa off and Syed Rizwan Farook realized that his arranged marriage was to an ugly man.
Some feedback from ziocon "buddy" on this revelation
"Yeah I heard the girls audio yesterday...so full of shit. If it was 3 white guys, why is there a dead man and women hadji in the middle of the street with weapons. Fucking people saying that shit aren't Americans and should be executed."
I naturally asked when he started thinking the first and fourth ammendment werent important..and why he cares about the second. Naturally I asked when book burning became a good idea.
RIPS
Is Al-Taqiyya anything like Kol Nidre? I'm behind in my Islamic studies.
She's a dude....Poor health inspector didn't know until he lifted the hut after her married "her". Now you guys understand what drove him to shoot up the .gov.....He was in a hurry to get to some virgins...
Is Al-Taqiyya anything like Kol Nidre? I'm behind in my Islamic studies.
It appears that you must be up on your Jewish studies.
Your Islamic Imam is not going to be happy with you. Severe Islamic huhud (punishment) awaits you.
The word "al-Taqiyya”literally means: "Concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies at a time of eminent danger, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury.”A one-word translation would be "Dissimulation."
Ah, MDB and his own patented brand of sarcasm. How we love him!
yep...and by his own illogical post, we could say that when an christian white conservative flips out and goes postal that it doesnt really reflect the vast magority of that demographic yet there are the liberal turds screeming that every white guy is a crazy gun toting SOB.
It's funny that we still use the labels "liberal" and "conservative" in 2015.
Those labels are 20 years out of date.
I say we replace "conservative" with doubleplus good, and "liberal" with blackwhite. Of course we can also go with doubleplus ungood (for Conservatives) or whiteblack (for those formerly known as democrats), I'm open to suggestions.
Herd Redirectio... goes both ways kind of like Caitlyn Jenner.
Right, you and Barack?
This is exactly what our Attorney General Loretta Lynch said. But it turns out that an eyewitness has ID'd the suspects as 'three tall white men'. Eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable which is why ethnic profiling is clearly not the answer. But the only alternative it seems to me is massive sweeps of everyone's records. Somehow these individuals slipped through the net. This is the price we pay in today's homeland for lax gun laws.
"O" NOW That WAS A Rousing Speach last Night...
Tashfeen Malik could have been Obama's son.
Barry's "vetting" process is a failure like most of the other actions he's taken during his reign including the Obamcare Fiasco where millions were thrown off their insurance and millions of bits of data were stolen from the Obamacare web site.
"Change you can believe in!"
I could not have thought of a better euphemism for this destruction.
How about "deliberate failure"?
It is amazing how much publicity these two are getting. It has been the only thing on the news for aleast three days. Overall, the three core meltdown in Japan is going to kill many more people then these two could possibly and it gets ZERO coverage.
Yep - And I'm sure ISIS and whoever the fuck else notices the same ...
A terror alert for today from 1962:
Vladimir Putin and 9/11 (+ A terror alert for today from 1962)It's getting attention b/c peeples are worried about the next 100,000 "refugees" Barry is going to "vet" and then disperse throughout the nation.
How can we vet any of them when a "terrorist" is now a nursing mother abandoning her baby? Fuhgedaboutit.
Without publicity there would be no terror.
Why don't the elite ever get hit (like in the 70's?)
There is no terrorism, not since the IRA.
Margaret 'There is no alternative' Thatcher forced the UK TV media to censor Gerry Adams' speeches. The media got round that by having an actor read out whatever he said whilst in the US.
The media wastes no time wondering why modern Islamic terrorists and the vast majority of all terrorists almost never hit anything of actual systemic importance - critical infrastructure or highly important persons.It should be abundantly clear to all that terrorism against developed nations never accomplished any of its stated or assumed objectives, yet the so-called terrorist "masterminds" haven't changed the playbook for a century. We are frequently reminded how vulnerable essential infrastructure is, and high-profile individuals are frequently vulnerable, yet they are never targeted for anything but graffiti and heckling, respectively.
Which has a greater disruptive and terrorizing effect, a greater negative impact on a larger number of people? A Paris-style attack that is over within a few hours and directly involves only a few hundred people at most, after which everyday life resumes immediately, or a local/regional power grid downing, lasting for 1-2 weeks and directly affecting millions? It is embarrassingly obvious. The pulverization of the Al-Shifa plant was a greater act of terror than anything IS has accomplished or will ever accomplish outside of Syraq; likewise the destruction of Iraq was a greater terrorist attack than 1000 9/11s combined.
Whenever this inconvenient line of questioning pops up it is instantly smashed down as missing the point - terrorism is about feelings and perceptions, not physical damage and bodycounts. Which society is more affected, one in which a mere handful of the annual mass-shootings will be determined to be politically motivated in some ill-defined way as the populace with zero material effect on 99.99% of the population, or a whole society living under constant and direct threat of major disturbance to water/waste treatment, power transmission, food delivery, access to medical care, etc.? Is quotidian life is Paris objectively different from how it was 4 weeks ago? What about in New York vis December of 2000? Not in any way that could possibly be construed as having been a direct, necessary, natural effect of terrorism or which materially advances the cause or interests of the alleged terrorists. The terrorizing occurs after the fact and must be carefully cultivated and maintained by the MSM and PTB, the terrorists themselves, real or imaginary, are bit players, they don't even get named in the credits.
+1
It must be our freedom they hate us for. /s
This is a mind control mechanism. The more you bombard a person with a repeated message coming from trusted sources, especially TV as it infiltrates the sub conscious, the more it is accepted as fact. The greater number of times the message is received the more virulent the rejection automatically blocks any information of the opposing message even if logical and true.
In short the old saying "If you repeat a lie often enough people believe it is true." is correct.
There are TWO eyewitnesses who claim they saw "three tall white men" doing the shooting, Sally Abdelmageed and Juan Hernandez. Let's keep the spotlight on this incident because no matter which way you slice it, this shit sammich reeks to high heaven. You are doing Gods' work, Tyler!
"they saw "three tall white men" doing the shooting"
Yes, but that's the first thing that the legacy "news" media always says. Then they find out what happend and decide whether to make it public it or not. Normally **not** - because it wasn't white males.
"News..."
Being a government building, let's see the closed circuit camera footage or are we still waiting on Rita Katz to finalize the story.
You will be shown a video soon but the quality will be so shitty that you will see nothing but two monkey running around with banana in their hands
Duplicate
The Umpqua killer asked if they were Christian before shooting. The MSM ignored that fact. Umpqua and Sandy Hook elementary were both gov. buildings. Yet, no CCTV footage.
I'd rather keep the spotlight on who is buying ISIS oil............namely the 'salt of the earth' jews....
this is just a distraction....
Some country other than Israel is the middle man. Keep your focus on that first, second on the end user and other intermediaries if any.
We're supposed to believe someone with a Muslim last name like Abdelmageed?
When in doubt blame WHITEY!
I wonder what this couple was doing for four hours after killing spree within one mile of the crime scene?
"Both suspects were killed in a subsequent shootout with police and in the wake of the tragedy,".
We tend to forget and be thankful for the fast response of law enforcement who transitioned from terrorist drills a few blocks away into hot pursuit. When they found these two handcuffed in the back of the get away vehicle reminiscent of the cornering of Bonnie & Clyde they let them have it. Society was saved and we all live to celebrate Obama's "Holy day Season". Speaking of Obama we should be thankful as the safety and well being of American citizens are his number one priority, and every morning when he wakes up this is the first thought on his mind. We are so blessed!
That's the best alternative story so far proposed on ZH
There's always a "drill"
Imagine how bad it would have been, if there had not been active shooter drills every month at Inland Regional Center /s
The "three tall white men" are the WTC7 of this one.
There will be a correction. What she said was there were "3 tall Wise Men" not white men. It was, after all a Christmas party No?
"The "three tall white men" are the WTC7 of this one."
We're supposed to believe one so-called witness with a Muslim last name like Abdelmageed?
The three tall white men whom the woman with the Muslim last name claimed she saw at the shootings are probably just as fictional as the white men in Al Sharpton's fake rape story about Tawana Brawley.
If only the eye witness had a trustworthy last name like maybe Greenspan, Blankfein, Yellen, Bernanke, Zevi, anything with stein or berg on the end...
While they might not always be truthful, at least they don't declare Islamic jihad on non-believers.
That sure doesn't look like 3 tall athletic men as described by one one the witlessness or was it 2. What difference at this point does it make, they hate our freedoms and want to take them all away
Which ones are you referring to as hating our freedoms, the Muzzies or .gov?
I'm still hung up on O'Douchebags comment about No-Fly Lists and guns.
I think what the idiot is trying to say is, if someone is on a No-Fly List it's fine for them to be walking around among us in public...yep...no problem there, nothing to see there, just move along. But allow them to get on a plane?!
Oh hell no!...lol.
Or am I THE ONLY ONE who see's the absolute perfect governmental insanity of that?
In most instances, it probably is fine for them to be walking around us in public. What is the criteria for a person to be placed on the no fly list? I guarantee that due process isn't involved.
"I guarantee that due process isn't involved."
And that's the point of Dear Leader's desires. "You dare speak out against totalitarian government? You are dangerous... no fly list for you! Now give us your guns." It's a leftist's dream scenario.
Watch for THEM to start placing people on a no-fly list, just so they can take their guns.
They've got to get it passed first. Gun rights is one of the few issues that we do actually have a say in. This is for two reasons:
Whether a candidate actually gets hurt or helped by his stance on gun rights isn't nearly as dependent on campaign contributions as it is with other issues (see banking.) If there is an anti-gun candidate, a bunch of people get a phone call saying "this cat is anti-gun," then word spreads.
We gun owners are armed and are getting to the point where we're not going to take kindly to further gun control measures.
Gun rights are the only "rights" left.
Firearm ownership has been a big distraction from the fact that we have no economic freedom.
The patriot movement is looking for some boogeyman to defend themselves with firearms against, meanwhile, they need to put in long hours at dead end jobs to come up with the money to pay for said equipment.
I know a lot of these militia type guys and almost all of them are in massive debt from buying "toys" and they work shitty jobs to pay back the debt. These dead end jobs at these corporations are so authoritarian that they would make the East German Stasi blush. ( I recommend reading Bob Black's "The Abolition of Work" to see the comparisons)
How can you fight some external enemy when your own economic enslavement to a dead end job is infinitely worse, but these gun guys just fail to see the matrix encased over their eyes.
Obama the gun salesman gets on TV and says the magic talismanic phrase "gun control" and all of the schmucks run out and buy guns with credit cards.
I facepalm, because I have seen this sham over and over and over again ever since his election.
Buying guns made by MIC corporations with big bank credit cards are the balls and chains you are putting on to yourselves.
I haven't flown in 17+ years for exactly that reason, I couldn't take a gun. So I drive, I enjoy it, I'm the pilot and I'm armed. If they determine that no guns are allowed on interstate highway's as it is federal property then I'll have a problem.
A friend's sister was put on the no-fly list. Her luggage was in the trunk of the car along with a bunch of legal fireworks her husband had in the trunk. Dogs sniffed out her luggage and she wasn't allowed to board the plane and she was put on the list. She has no remedy to get off the list. My guess is, most of the people on the no-fly list are harmless, yet dangerous psychopaths are allowed to board aircraft on a regular basis.
If dangerous psychopaths were banned from flying, how would our elected representatives ever travel (including the STROKUS and his W00ki3 boyfriend)?
"My guess is, most of the people on the no-fly list are harmless, yet dangerous psychopaths are allowed to board aircraft on a regular basis."
A case in point is the underwear bomber for whom a "sharp dressed man" intervened so that he was allowed to board after the gate clerk had turned him away.
"dangerous psychopaths are allowed to board aircraft on a regular basis."
even worse, muslim terrorists are allowed to attend Californian Christmas parties
Coming soon: a new website operated by eGovPay where innocents can have themselves removed from the no fly list. It's quick, easy, and painless. There is of course a $575 processing fee.
Not sure but Ted Kennedy was on no fly list one time
You don't see how valuable that tactic is for Uncle Fraud? The No Fly list will be completely arbitrary depending on whether they toe the government agenda line. Argue against a fraudulent government on the internet? Get placed on the NO FLY list. Voice your opinion in an open forum anywhere? Get placed on the NO FLY list.
We're talking about some serious control of the public and as usual, the American public is stone cold braindead as to its real purpose.
YES.
And this is what Hillary Clinton was keenly aware of as she said on MSM that she doesn't want to have any 'chipping away' of the no fly list. What is key is just whom gets on this list - not that the list should be about guns. Who decides on the reasons for listing someone? And if there is a no-fly list, doesn't this indicate that the people listed are a threat to citizens and that they shouldn't be in public space at all?
and at some point the airlines will complain that there is nobody left to fly on their planes.
Then the govt will start up a no-drive list and revoke driving licenses.
But GM doesn't have to worry about not selling any more cars cause the Govt got their back.
"Then the govt will start up a no-drive list and revoke driving licenses."
They've been doing that for years. I can personally attest to this.
By having the "no-fly" list at all, means that there is somewhere your name can be put which has other consequences.
If a "moderate" form of gun control equates no-fly with no-gun, then there is no limit to who can be refused weapons.
double post
They want the no fly list because it is private and there is no judicial oversight for it.
They can monitor your purchases, then follow you around, and then slap you on the list and show up at your door.
That is why they want the no fly list to be used.
A good logic pretzel from his speech:
So they are saying that no matter what laws or tools they have, it will not stop people from committing mass shootings. So please let them go ahead and keep implementing more laws and tools that do nothing to stop what cannot be stopped, but will surely make for a more malleable populace when draconian measures are needed after the dollar collapses.
If you cannot identify every would be shooter, how are you going to keep them from getting guns? Duh.
pods
Yeah, the pretzel logic gives them away everytime...lol. It's about as sane as the insane sheeple bleating "Do something!!!" on any given subject.
Again, as for myself, I would gladly pay them to do absolutely nothing in order to stop them from fucking up everything they touch and the list is almost endless.
It's a very long list everyone here is by now familiar with ;-)
WTF did you say to get downed?
WTF did YOU say to get downed?
If I had to guess, it would be:
"I would gladly pay them to do absolutely nothing"
Isn't that their goal?
The "no fly list" argument might be valid if there wasn't hundreds of thousands already on it....many unknowingly, and all without recourse. As with civil forfeiture, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent, and that proof...that JUDGEMENT is a long hard and expensive road that few can travel. We all understand that sometimes it is necessary to surrender some rights for the greater good, the more precious of those demanding very compelling evidence. But when it is done secretly and without recourse, a very high bar has been breached.
Our government should be forced to provide incontrovertible evidence for the need for such tyranny before even considering it. We are dependent upon our press for such things and they are lying down, no, in league with these tyrannical powers, lulled by the reinforcement of their own self importance.
I had a friend who had the same name as someone on the no fly list. He had to fly a lot and it was an insane hassle. not sure if he ever got it fixed.
Sorry, I cannot agree.
The no fly list is thought crime, pure and simple. You cannot use thought crime to infringe on a right.
As Denninger put it, just because you cannot yell fire in a crowded theater doesn't mean they can muzzle you before you walk in.
Same thing with firearms. You cannot be deprived of your right to self defense solely because they think you might do something. Or have done something and paid your dues (felons).
Simple, either you want a free society and all the issues that go with it, or you do not.
pods
As free people we should be able to determine or recognize threat without the necessity of dying first as the only proof. While I would agree that much of what we see as LAW in our modern "society" IS pre-crime, we must also be able to distinguish real potential threat. If we insist on not being examined by the TSA and we insist on no one being judged a threat based on their actions or words, then air travel will end. It is one thing when you can actually try and punish someone for a crime, but when that purpose is cancelled with the deliberate suicide, punishment is NOT a deterrent. All one is left with IS prevention. So if you are content with that, your choice remains the same as mine with only the motive different. If their is no assessment of risk, no prevention of crime, then I simply won't fly or use any public facility. For you, if there is prevention in place, you may well judge to not fly or go to public places because of your perceived loss of liberty. In either case, those who seek to do us harm have won. What we must deal with is the lack of moderation and balance....in either direction. Our real dilemma is the complete destruction of trust in our government and its appendages. Without trust, there is no social structure that will provide any liberty beyond what can be taken by force.
It's that "precrime" solution they want to use with us including our kids and grandkids. Should mesh well with Common Core's data gathering and profiling.
If you love your children, get them away from the public school system.
http://womenonthewall.org/
Specifically,
https://vimeo.com/132164726
I dunno Nmewn. You never know when a toddler may be packing. I fly safe knowing the NSA covers all the bases. You can't be too safe doncha know.
Miffed;-)
It would be stupid to NOT screen plane passengers, but instead we have made it dumber still by insisting on screening everyone with no obvious prioritization (profiling) and hiring low wage stooges as our protectors, taking our nail clippers (making them appear even more ignorant and arbitrary) and imposing no fly lists without reasonable recourse or review. It comes across as heavy handed and inept.
Further, we know all of the surveillance appears to be ineffectual for its stated purpose while we fear it ultimately will be turned against us.
A few years back the brother of a friend had flown to the UK on vacation. When he was to return, the airport in London detained him for hours, cagily questioning him until he finally discovered his "issue" was that he had purchased reloading supplies with the same credit card he had bought his tickets. They had no problem with him leaving the US, only returning. It is this type of thing that worries most of us. The arbitrary sense of our security apparatus and how any of us can get trapped in it with no way out, while meanwhile we are IMPORTING Syrians who have been thoroughly vetted.
At least you can get your nail clipper, Swiss Army knife and Leatherman back by going to eBay. The have bulk lot sales identified as TSA confiscation.
The government Bar flies (that's lawyers) have figured out how to use the commerce clause in the American Constitution to restrict your ability to use your protected rights. All commercial means of traveling and firearms production and sale must comply with government regulations. Now the people can only purchase the commercial services or products which the commercial entity is allowed to sell with restrictions.
Air travel is dually regulated. The air line companies are governed by both the commerce clause in the Constitution and the law of Admiralty which governs the sea and the air. The Peoples rights in the Constitution come from the land or nature ( the creator ).
I'm still waiting for a confirmed one.
Which one were you thinking of?
So if she lived in SA for 25 years and in Pakistan for ? years. How old is she ? Thats way far beyond any marketable age for a Islamic wife and child bearer. Generally females in that culture get married when they bleed. The longer they wait usually means they are not virgin and no longer viable to pure Islamic family situation.
Was she a "beard"?
Very, very good point. However, this guy might have had it arranged by family for fun and profit.
He might have been a stooge after all.
I suppose I can see why someone may have mistaken her for a man
The burkas would be great for those Muslim males involved in gay relationships. What a cover-up.
A tent with a "pole"?
@manthong
thong, you know by pushing the position that these two didnt commit the crime you are playing into cair's and obamas game that this was white men and white men are the real threat. the idea that a muslim claims she say 3 white men and cair claims that these two are innocent has to be the biggest joke. they were shot to death on live tv....hahaha
Nope...nothing creepy looking about those 2 fuckers. They look so full of joy...happy to be free and in America, don't they? They obviously fit right in. No red flags from the Toilet Safety Administration, but the TSA will hassel the fuck out of a old crippled person in a wheel chair all fucking day long.
My advice for you is avoid flying to Detroit Metro as this is more than a familair sight.
'She'? Whaddya mean 'she'?
My middle-schoolers think that's a guy in drag, or a woman in need of hormone therapy.
I told them that that's how most of them look, and that's how the Saudi men like them. That Fareek fella is a case in point.
Fast food/GMO ladened diet.
If you want your working endocrine system, you can have your working endocrine system.
Monsanto and Cargill get around, don't they?
That's what she looked like coming straight out of the middle east.
WARNING: Cathartic comment coming up in 3...2...1...
Put a Koran over her face and do it for Allah.
Aloha Snackbar!
This is nothing new. I saw pictures of Lee Harvey Oswald holding a carbine, plus he was distributing anti-US leafets in New Orleans!
His wife looked like a tranny. "She" probably has a dick. Those muslims love the cock.
My work associate worked at a high end lingerie shop when she was 16. They opened the store from 10PM to midnight for ME men for private shopping. I told her I thought that was considerate of the owners for allowing the men to shop discreetly for their wives. She burst out laughing. No, it was for them personally, she showed them to the dressing rooms. Quite an education for a 16 year old girl. Me as well!
I don't think religion is effective in eradicating perceived perversion, just drives it into the shadows.
Miffed;-)
Obama...This isn't a war against religion (Islam), this is a war against the people that STRICTLY follow a religion (Islam).
Can we also assume about WW2 that "This isn't a war against the German people, this is a war against the followers of Nazi ideology"?
Had to throw that Hitler chestnut in there...been a while..
Wut?
No refunds!!!
It is high time that "mainstream, peaceful" Muslims start ferretting out the rats in their midst.
And it is also time that this country ask itself what is America's interest in the Middle East. Surely the oil canard has run its course.
Agree on both points.
It is high time that "mainstream, peaceful" Muslims start ferretting out the rats in their midst.
That unfortunately, would be against their religion.
The realization has finally come to me that Obama is correct in refusing to refer to those who would kill in the name of Allah as radical or extremist. They are not extreme or radical. It is those Muslims who are peacefull who are the radicals as they are the ones attempting to steer Islam away from its violent roots. It becomes obvious that it is only those who choose to ignore its violent teachings who are the true radicals and fortunately they appear to be in the majority, yet remain relatively fragile and subject to revertion if pressed. We have seen mainstream Christianity moderate over the centuries, even to the point of the creation and adoption of a New Testimate, one significantly less violent in its descriptions than the Old. We can only hope that this new radical departure from historic Muslim texts and interpretations is ultimately adopted and embraced by all Muslims. Fundamental Islam is at war with the world, in words and in deeds.
Sure, we need more NEW terstaments, based on the OLD testament, which is a sheer, blank, bottomless lie.
Most religions evolved in medieval type of times. Violence was the nature of life. We should see moderation of religion as a positive and for those who want to do the same for Islam, I support them, regardless of how backward and violent its history.
Besides, now we have the religion of State, that relies less on direct violence than it does division. Rather than have a common culture or even language, the religion of State seeks to dominate us by promoting our individuality at the expense of our unity in resistance to them. Divided we are subservient. We are told to surrender our freedoms to the state, for the good of the state...the collective, of which we are to contribute but not share in its rewards. Sacrifice is our theme. Bend over is our call to prayer.
I repeatedly tried to get people to understand that since I have been a member of ZH. The Radicals are ones that won't try to kill you. The ones that will try to kill you are following the teachings of Mohumpted.
Yup. You got it exactly right. Islam is what it is, many radicals try to not do their duty in Jihad. The True Believers are in fact returning it to its roots and now we must return to ours and slaughter them.
I wish there was a MSM in Afghanistan Iraq Libya and Syria to tell them it's all for your freedom and if you haven't done anything wrong nothing to worry.
The muslims will never rat out their own becuase they queitly agree with these savages and their actions. And I agree its time we cut off all ties and travel to that part of the world and anyone who hails from that dark place. Nothing but death and savagery comes from those people.
The only way for Muslims to reject terror is to reject their sacred texts.
...It's not that hard; Christians do it all the time.
If what YOU want goes against what "GOD" wants, then do what YOU want and F "God".
Where are the remains of the "victims"?
Where are the remains of these two? Or, where were they sent to hide after the show was over?
Who is the person hiding in the bathroom that "survived"? Where is he now?
They were vaporized in the fire. And the Planned Parenthood clinic next door collapsed at the same time.
An eyewitness says they saw 3 shooters, tall white men. No video surveillance of the incident at all? Really?
The MSM can tear through their unsealed "crime scene" apartment but as far as their whereabouts..................................
Reported by the BBC 20 minutes before it collapsed into it's own footprint.
Frontrunning
the TSA (to prove their diversity) lets people like this bypass any scanning or search and probably kneels to honor them
I saw an Orthodox Jew stopped by TSA at JFK./s
TSA stopped Rand Paul a couple of years ago. He sat down on a chair and quietly waited. It seemed that someone was trying to get him to throw a fit. Even said that he was aggressive. Luckily, someone had pulled out an iphone and proved the lie.
Ridiculous.
2 Questions: How can the NSA find all my credit card purchases yet fail to find a terrorist? Priorities maybe. Why would the NSA, CIA, State Department place any credibility in anything that comes from the House Saud? Seriously, inquiring minds want to know.
Why do you think the NSA didn't find the "terrorist"?
They were too busy analyzing and selling your holiday shopping spending patterns. They are crunched this time of year you know!
GDP will rise due to government spending vast amounts of overtime paying their minions to calculate and create new and improved graphs and metrics to convince us of our miraculus recovery and utopian fate. No time for racial profiling innocent Muslims only looking for a better life.
Now that they are so vigorously "vetting" Syrian Immigrants (no wonder they are so pissed off when they get here), I sure hope my vet bills don't start going up or I'll have to let my dog go....
Let's see. Arriving from Wahhabi Saudi Arabia from Pakistan birth. Nope. No clues there. Let her through.
All terrorist leads go through house of saoud Perhaps this keeps the oil price low!
They were all buried at sea according to muslim custom.
Buried at sea is not a Muslim custom. The custom is to be buried quickly, in an unmarked grave, with no prayers to Allah. Of course that hasn't been followed for a long time, judging by all the grave stones in their cemetaries. Burial at sea is allowed only if too far from land within the alotted time for a burial. (Bodies don't smell to good in the heat)
They're being autopsied according to US law.
In the waiting room with Osama