This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Yet Again, The Media Got The Facts Wrong About The San Bernardino Attacks
Submitted by Derrick Broze via TheAntiMedia.org,
On Wednesday, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations said the agency has no evidence the married couple accused of killing 14 people in San Bernardino, California earlier this month had any connection to an active terror cell. This admission from the FBI directly contradicts media reports that immediately claimed the San Bernardino shooters were linked to Daesh (ISIS) via social media.
Speaking at a counterterrorism conference in New York, Director James Comey said Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were inspired by Daesh, but were not directly involved with any specific terror group. Reuters reports that Comey believes Daesh has “revolutionized” terrorism by using social media to spread propaganda to inspire small-scale attacks.
“Your parents’ al Qaeda was a very different model than the threat we face today,” Comey said.
Despite the admission the couple had no connection to Daesh, Comey said Farook and Malik had shown support for “jihad and martyrdom” in private communications as early as 2013, but never in public on social media. The director also stated the FBI has “hundreds” of ongoing investigations in every state in the nation that involve potential Daesh-inspired terror plots.
Comey also repeated his calls for ending encrypted communication based on the premise that Daesh uses encryption to plan terror attacks. “We are not going to break the Internet,” he said while challenging technology companies to stop creating services that cannot be accessed by law enforcement. Comey’s calls for breaking encrypted communications echo the recent efforts of police chiefs and attorney generals across the United States.
Another piece of the puzzle that must be considered pertains to conflicting eyewitness accounts of the San Bernardino shooting. Although the oldstream media quickly accepted the narrative of a Muslim couple radicalized by anti-American sentiment and radical Islam, there was at least one conflicting account that should be investigated.
Shortly after the shooting, witness Sally Abdelmageed talked to CBS News about what she saw. Abdelmageed works at the Inland Regional Center and saw the shooters enter the building. She told CBS’s Scott Pelley that she saw what appeared to be three white men dressed in military clothes.
“We saw three men dressed in all black military attire, with vests on, holding assault rifles, and they opened up the doors to building 3 and one of them starts to spray and shoot all over the room,” Sally Abdelmageed told Pelley.
When asked to provide more detail about the shooters she said, “I couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on, from my view all i could see was a black hat. A black long sleeve shirt, possibly gloves on, he had black cargo pants, the kinds with zippers and big puffy pockets. He had a huge assault rifle and extra ammo. I just saw three.”
“You’re certain you saw three men?” Pelley asked.
“Yes, it looked like their skin color was white. They looked like they were athletic and they appeared to be tall.”
Her account matches the original report from Southern California’s Fox 11, which tweeted that police were searching for “3 white males dressed in military gear.” Another eyewitness expressed doubt that Farook was the culprit.
Whatever the truth is, it seems obvious the government will use this crisis to add more fuel to the fire that is the global War on Terror. This fire — and the insanity it breeds — threatens to consume the planet, leaving behind a scorched Earth devoid of common sense and critical thinking. Avoiding catastrophe and further division of the people is going to take each and every awakened soul.
»
- 35 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Facts + Media = Oxymoron! With a slight emphasis on the MORON!
3 white guys who disappeared when the perps had a rented black SUV with Nevada plates or sumptin'?
And then the media drops all the prior eyewitness reports in favor of popo prognostications?
These things all seem to have such an "odd" side.
You mean odd like, "Isn't it odd that the authorities would allow the press to stampede like Water Buffalo into Farook's apartment, an alleged evidence and crime scene?" That kind of odd?
Yeah. That kind of "odd". Exactamundo.
Kinda like the "odd" (on a bigger scale) where the NSA listens to everything we domestic law abiding citizens do, but won't check the social media background of Somalis coming into the country ILLEGALLY (as in, in contravention of immigration laws) kind of "odd"
San Bernardino is the west coast's ghetto. Large swaths of the city were bought up to be torn down to improve the city. What could ISIS have to gain by attacking such an impoverished city? The place is full of gunfire, so much so that no one even pays attention to it.
Watched 7/7 Ripple Effect yesterday. I don't need anymore convincing that these are false flags. The "Gun Grab" is second, IMO, to the main goal which is to keep the "kids" in fear/distracted with the Dem/Rep Rubberneck merry-go-round so our global hegemony stays on track.
Other terrorists attacks have brought critisizm to the agencies that are supposed to see them coming. Now a, for reasons unknown, terrorists attack they are saying this is not a terrorist attack and so we have been protecting Americans.
This is a conspiracy of a conspiracy.
Between the media, the govenment agencies and the feed back from the public this stuff can be steared along a path of popular opinion for a long time. It is better than a pole. Truly Orwellian.
And the origin of that Webbank deposit for $28,500 in their bank account?
Money from heaven?
Yeah... like "odd"
The same old MO every time there is a false flag gun grab event.
Yes the msm is the propaganda machine of choice used by all bankrupt governments, but as Clinton said 'we are losing the info war'......people are starting to wake up to the BS they churn out and are looking elswhere for the truth!
Unfortunately, The agenda rolls on......
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2015/12/as-events-spiral-ou...
The shooters not being white Christian males actually works against the gun grab agenda. Before they were identified, there was a shitstorm of "nanny nanny boo boo, it's a white Christian male and we're going to get to take your guns away." I was listening to the police scanner when it was going on, and it was abundantly clear that the news was trying to spin the event in favor of the gun grabber's agenda. The problem here is that the government fucked up when creating its newest boogieman by using actual boogiemen instead of shills that will only kill whom we want dead.
The government is not going to control a bunch of inbred religious nutters. And they are inbred:
http://geneticseducation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Consanguinity-wor...
Well now the narrative is moving towards a straw purchaser for their 'arsenal' so we can at least look forward to closing the 'gunshow loophole' (whatever the hell that mythological maneuver is) and probably an outright ban on private sales.....
It's not just the purchasers that are straw here, it is also what they are grasping at. I doubt it will pass for starters. Even if it did, I would flat out ignore it. I'm not alone. Not another fucking inch.
“I couldn’t see a face..."
Yet somehow, she *knows* they were all males.
Troll a little harder next time, Derrick.
Every seen Moochelle from the back?
Grow the fuck up.
The one pro-active former-female does 'self-identify' as a male gendered so in fact they were right!
Eye witness testimony is scary as hell. Mental predispositions tend to fill in the gaps of what was not actually seen.
"Her account matches the original report from Southern California’s Fox 11, which tweeted that police were searching for “3 white males dressed in military gear.” Another eyewitness expressed doubt that Farook was the culprit."
The whole San Bernardino incident is swimming in lies. Here's a great breakdown from 21st Century Wire:
(Start at about minute 14)
http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/12/06/episode-112-sunday-wire-from-san-b...
The best I can take away from all these 'attacks', is if there is a substantial 'training event' happening with law enforcement, first responders, or 3 letter .GOV agencies, etc., anywhere near you, get away and stay away. Not only would a large number of armed people 'training'(presumably inexperienced) make me nervous, the sheer number of events coinciding with 'attacks' should make you go 'hmmmm'...
There was a time when people were talking about the FEMA camps being constructed in San Bernardino out at the old Norton Air Force base. FWIW there is large Homeland Security office that is massively fenced in on Rialto avenue, just south of the old mall on 2nd street by the 215 freeway..
They don't want da peeples to criticize Barry's importation of another 100k refugees so they were pressurized to change their story.
this is the truth
"They were basically completely covered in black clothing, and I couldn't see a face, but their skin color looked white."
OK...
Regardless I think it would be pretty difficult to confuse 3 tall well built men men for a 90 lb. woman and a tall skinny guy.
Eyewitness testimony is famously unreliable. Ask anyone involved in any area of the criminal justice system. Just sayin'...
Did you ever see the "guy on the street" who was interviewed by a fox reporter on 9-11? He knew exactly how/why the WTC 1-2 fell. He was obviously a plant, as this women may be. BUT, i find it ironic that ADAM LANZA, a skinny, introverted , deer caught in the headlights kid, with out having converted his rifle to fully automatic, killed more people than these 2 adults who altered their ar-15's.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z45hI6YuC-I
Professor Tracy of Florida Atlantic University who has questioned that event is about to lose his job.
Also Amazon has disappeared a book on that topic.
I guess that's why eyewitnesses are never allowed to testify in court.
/s
Eyewitnesses are "famously unreliable" when they don't support one's point of view.
Why Science Tells Us Not to Rely on Eyewitness Accounts:
Eyewitness testimony is fickle and, all too often, shockingly inaccurate
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-the-eyes-have-it/
I was one on a jury trying 2 men for brutally beating a man. There were approximately 30 witnesses and 10 testified at the trial. Accounts varied dramatically and we were having difficulty coming to a conclusion. Then we decided to diagram the crime scene and it helped to see the relationship between the person giving testimony and the crime scene. One said they saw everything clearly but we knew the man's truck would have obscured his view. You'd be surprised how the mind " fills in gaps" and you internalize them as truth. I honestly don't think anyone was intentionally lying. After hearing 10 people tell their story we could roughly see what probably happened but absolute truth would never be possible.
I don't think one can come to any conclusions based on one person's account and it bothers me we haven't heard from others who were present.
Miffed
Yes, have any of the survivors positively ID'd the shooter as their coworker, Farook? Also, the building had to have security cameras. Are they waiting to release the footage for some reason? Perhaps they were wearing balaclavas or something (I haven't been following this story too closely - it's too damned depressing).
You're not very familiar with Californians, are you?
3 whites guys headed for LAX to get back to Langley
craft guys like Boston
I am shocked I tell you.. SHOCKED!
Ask that Brian Williams NBC dude who makes all kinds of shit up ... he knows exactly what happened! He was there havin' a smoke while playin' pocket pool when he saw it all go down!
Brian Williams was doing a ride-along with police whom he had to rescue with his superhuman kung fu and marksmanship skills after they became pinned down during the firefight with the 'Bernardino Deuce.'
Damn! Ship that dude a Pulitzer!
Was Hillary his wing 'man'? You know, all that sniper fire and running for her life crap...
Que Dan Rather to say, "and that's why his head snapped back, because President Kennedy was shot from the rear!"
Ah, the Olde Grassy Knoll theory (likely as right as rain... and remember most of the eyewitnesses up close died off right away, too) which every-time I hear the "official" line on Dallas reminds me of the big sore I have on my nut-sack with all the hair growing out of it in which the shooters can hide.
WTF is wrong with most people that they just don't question shit in their lives?
Yeah, so ridiculous, that a communist loser would asassinate a staunchly anti-communist US President. That thought would cause a lot heads to explode, necessitating the spinning of elaborate conspiracies with hundreds of moving parts.
When he started talking about a "scorched Earth devoid of common sense and critical thinking," I thought he was refering to the US public school system.
Ahem ...common sense & critical thinking is extremely unsensitively racist, socio-unredistributionist & class-structure exclusionary! It a white man's misogynist constuct & has no place in any progressive enlightened unionist public education system.
You PC Bro!?!
Sadly just another flaming militant lezbo trapped inside a male body!
PCBinghamton Bro!
Any good Puss to Crush round here??
Where are the CCTV leaks from inside?
Someone almost ALWAYS leaks a video...
....and drops his tea party membership i.d. card
Now if one can trace back to the Source from where the fabricated media reports came from, i.e. who ultimately was responsible; who made up the misleading story, then you're probably going to be dealing with a ZIonist Bolshevik Jew.
There six banks that all think they own the 4th estates mortgage. And do
Well, technically it's the Vanguard Group, BlackRock, State Street and Fidelity, when you drill down a bit.
Sooner or later one of these events is going to be fucked up and caught on video that goes viral, and that's going to be an uncomfortable moment.
I thought it was fascinating that the police confiscated victim's phones after the Oregon shooting. I'd love to see how that's legally justified, and if people get their phones back without tampering.
I sure hope your right and they do get caught like that, we need it pretty badly at this point.
On the other hand, when they legalized torture in plain sight on the MSM it should have made the majority of the population aware of what we were dealing with but no such luck.
After reading this, I thought I accidentally went to Infowars.com.
Please feel free to believe everything you are told by the teevee because Alex Jones is half batshit.
Alex may be half bat-shit, but he has been right with most Conspiracy Theories becoming Conspiracy Facts over the years.
Not defending or anything, just sayin', just a casual observer of the human condition ....
Yep. Was lots of evidence right from the get go. That is right away.
Leaving aside the idea of a new mom who had up christmas lights being a takfiri terrorist.
But the cover story sure got the Fox/Breitbart crowd going hating all the mooooslims.
And fearing the 'isis'.
Which is fucking exactly what it was designed to do.
Rumor is it was guys from Acadami.
there have been several autism researcher deaths lately. I read that this facility was involved with autistic kids.maybe gcmaf involved. were any doctors killed? look up james bradstreet.
Phhuuuullleaze! Next thing you'll be telling me is that Wolf Blitzer in the Situation Room has a political agenda!
I was always suspicious about that.... S'why I started getting the real deal from MSNBC. Ha ha ha ha haha
Sally Abdelmageed is more creditable witness than Farooks' co-workers who immediately recognized him and advised the authorities as to the identity of the shooter? It speaks volumes about the poster's of that blog agenda.
I remember the initial reports were that it was white men armed in camouflage. Really wish I had screen shots.
I'll be ready next time.
Hey, don't blame the media, they only report what they're told to report.
This was a great catch. Newt Gingrich tweeted about the San Bernardino ISIS attack over 2 weeks prior to the event. The tweet has since been removed.
Crickets from the MSM.
https://willyloman.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/question.jpg
Maybe Newt is is the American Nostra-dumbass.
Even I knew at the time, this is what happens when you P'ss people off. And in a country with more Guns than people, it was innevitable what was going to happen next.
And it was even more apparent when FOX, CNN were doing the Online Auction Hunting, err News Broadcast.
Please refer to it as terrori$m to remind everyone that the news-ertainment biz profits on every event.
Actually there is NO EVIDENCE that they even did the shootings.
Where is the video of ANYONE entering the building carrying a gun?
if there is proof let's see it
I like how the MSM always lighten up ther faces so they look, well, whiter than they really are.
OK ,they had no connection to an active terror cell. They were an active terror cell although not directly tied to an "official" organization. These people don't need active direct connections to some mullah over in some God forsaken land. They have been divinely inspired by the All Unmerciful Alla, Unhallowed Be His Name! These are lone wolves in wolf clothing and its hunting season. Them or us.
Imagine that: the FBI, now largely politicized by the Obama agenda, sees no connection to an active terror cell.
Believing this post means believing the Obama administration's intentions are for the good of the United States.
Excrement is too good a word for it.
So somewhere in the 1st week of January, we'll forget all about this incident and in about 2 years reports will start leaking out that these people had nothing to do with the attacks and the woman who said she saw 3 white guys actually saw the perpetrators of this mass killing.
my take is that farookie fucked up. he got pissed and jumped the shark. i think there was a bigger hit scheduled with the 'other guys' at his house. this hot head fucked up their bigger plan. none of their plan makes senseas they ran it.
also having muzzies do this totally fucks obamas refugee plans. why would these asshats do something that would stop more terrorists from getting...then when you got bigger numbers and resources go shoot up shit. farookie was just a stupid hot head...
Too late! The bottomfeeders already ate.
There are plenty of odd things about this event. Left unexplained, I lean towards it being a choreographed false flag.
If it was a false flag and the actual shootings were carried out by 3 white Caucasians as several witnesses have claimed, why is it that Farooq and his wife Malik left their young baby with mother-in-law and attended the site at the same time as the shootings? He was off-duty as far as I know, so apparently had no reason to be there.
This suggests that they were willingly involved in 'something' on site which didn't turn out as they were expecting and ended with them being blamed for the shootings and shot down like dogs in a shoot out. Or so we are lead to believe by MSM.
Was that 'something' a carefully planned terrorism drill in which they played an innocent but important part? Or was it some other innocent activity requiring them to attend?
The other odd thing is whether anybody actually got shot at all and was it nothing more than crises-actors playing their prescribed roles.
Seeing people taken away in ambulances on stretchers or with blood stains on their clothes is not evidence that anybody was injured. Has there been a list of those killed/injured published?
Then there were the comments made by Farooq's landlord to a journalist: "it isn't real, it isn't real".
What did he mean?
FBI said the kids never posted any jihadi stuff on facebook or any social media.
former NSA/FBI agent said Craft International did the shootings
Craft Chris Kyle's company and the ones who were at the Boston Bombing Hoax.