This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Tracking People Flows: Global Migration Summarized In 7 Charts
With the topic of global (im)migration getting increasingly more
prominence as we get ever closer to the presidential elections, not to
mention Europe's ongoing plight with the biggest refugee crisis since
World War II, here is a
handful of factual, and bias-free, charts summarizing the key aspects
of global human mobility.
First, here is a summary tracker of global people flows since the start of the century. The countries in gray are sources of net people outflows, while those in blue have seen cumulative immigration over the past 15 years.
For some, actually make that many, nations the rise in the immigrant population is the only thing preventing the total population from shrinking.
It's not just Europe.
But Germany definitely has a problem.
The result is that, at least in Europe, the percentage of foreign-born residents is rising with every passing year.
The US appears headed in the same direction.
Even as the working foreigners do their best to share some of their newly-founded "wealth" with friend and family stuck back home and who have been less fortunate.
- 99 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -









I was under the impression that Colombia was one of the better places to go to nowadays in SA. Anyone here care to explain why the country has seen net expats recently?
I am curious because it is one of the places that I was considering dipping out to when things get too sketchy here in the USSA.
Aside from that, are there any other countries that you Hedgers recommend for expating to?
People in SA are slave to consumerism. They dream about going to the US. You plan is nothing wrong with.
i think you are underestimating the attraction of material possessions when you start out with not having any.
Go to Panama.
South America in general is afflicted by the same over sized government influence in personal affairs and business. And of course there was that active suppression of development the USA had its hand in.
I've known a number of Columbian engineering students. These guys are not dumb and not lazy in the least. But of course no integrated circuit industry in Columbia to speak of so of they go.
mud river meet clear stream. thanks merkel.
Uruguay, appears to be quite peaceful and has first world ammenties
It's somewhat backwards and forwards with their FARC issues. But you are right in one way; the degree of consensus that the incessant civil war destroys more than it builds up has been growing. Why don't you take a look at Escobar's Hippos and then make up your mind.
As with most things - it depends. Do you have a bunch of money? If yes, then New Z is a really good bet. Not so much $, then Phillipines is great bang for the buck outside of Manila. Really low on cash, try Paraguay or any of the countries in the region, or any of the down on their luck europe countries like Greece or Romania.
Places I have visited that are to be avoided at all cost: Africa, Middle East, Mexico, China, and Central America. Your life isnt worth much in any of those places.
If you need or anticipate needing medical care, the countries that have a business built upon medical tourism should be considered.
Hungary is full of people with advanced degrees, including medicine and dentistry, trying to drum up business. But the language is difficult and you won't find many English-speakers outside of Budapest. Still, Obuda is a wonderful place to settle if you like city life, all the amenities including medical and a good smattering of kids with enough English to find a translator on the spot at a roadside kabob stand.
Were I to become an expat, Africa would be at the top of my list. Madagascar is my target.
Spics are all liars and thieves. Ask any expats and they'll tell you. If you're white you will be discriminated against and taken advantage of. There's still some livable places. Will I name them here? Nope. Do your own research. Being old and white and having something in many of these places when the world looks like Venezuela... US will be better. The corruption today in these places hahaha you can't quite comprehend it until you've experienced it.
Yeah, Colombia! Maybe you can get a job at the Clinton Foundation there ;-)
theres a clinton sponsored library called mena in colombia?
New Zealand...
Geographically isolated in the Southern Hemisphere, we are less likely to be impacted by any of the activity occurring in the Northern Hemisphere - particularly the heavy pollution, or radiation in the event of nuclear fall out. Furthermore, NZ boasts a high level of economic freedom, and our economy is relatively resilient in that we would be able to sustain ourselves at least agriculturally if (when) global trade halts for any given reason. Additionally, NZ is rated one of the most peaceful places to live, and we uphold good international relations and are unlikely to be targetted in the event of war. It's relatively easy to get residency here and when compared to other Western countries our culture tends to be very accepting of diversity.
Although we are likely to feel climate change in the coming decades, our unique mountainous geography ensures that rain will always make its way to our soils - hence the nickname 'land of the long white cloud'. Finally, of the Western nations, we are one of the 'youngest' and have less sovereign debt than most. Our economy has been widely regarded as a safe option for investment diversification in preparation for the coming collapse - particularly by Schiff, and there is a great deal of speculation domestically that New Zealand farmland is being gobbled up by the 'elite' to serve as a bug-out safe haven after shit hits the fan. I wouldn't want to live anywhere else in this geopolitical and economic climate, and we New Zealanders will happily welcome anyone who is willing to contribute positively to our economy in seeking to retreat from the turmoil of the Northern Hemisphere!
New Zealand safe? I can't believe your naivite. What would 2 million Asian immigrants do to your demographics? How about 4 million? How about 8 million? You think these numbers are far-fetched?
China has 1,200,000,000,000 people. You think if 4,000,000 disappear China gives a fuck? I'll go you one better. The Chinese actively encourage Chinese to migrate and settle overseas and infiltrate those societies. Chinese immigrants are considered "industrious" or "hard-working" or "valuable members of the community." You think you can detect 2000 year old Chinese corruption practices? You think you can reverse it?
Good luck. The Chinese government prints yuan. Lavishes it on Chinese corporations, your politicians see dollar signs, your country gets bought.
Watch.
Haha yeah good point, hadn't thought about that. Chances are that the population/government wouldn't allow migrants in those numbers - we only have a population of 4mil or so, so we def don't have the infrastructure to support mass immigration. We do however have an 'aging population', and like most other Western nations, we will require skilled migrants to keep things running. You're bang on that we're being bought out etc, but I'm still standing by my previous comment that NZ is a safer place to be than smack bang in the middle of Europe, or anywhere in the vicinity of the US. We're fucked in terms of imports/exports, and yes our dominant industry is dairy - but what I'm saying is that in the event that global trade is disrupted, we could easily feed our own small population with what we produce. We have access to thousands of miles of beaches for seafood, 'kaimoana' as we call it. Plenty of fertile farmable land etc. I'd love to know which country you suggest as the ideal place to sit out this global clusterfuck... Most sane people will agree that the Southern hemisphere is ideal, and Nz has got to be the best country in the south - in my own biased opinion.
We'll be fine, you watch.
.
Your major export is milk, with 1 major trading partner: China. You have no manufacturing, but import almost everything. It is practically impossible to save any money because everything is so expensive and wages are low. one third of the population works for the government.
Lots of hard-nosed Scots (as long as we're on the subject), I reckon. Correspond with a few. One like-minded individual said, more or less, "save yourselves" and come on down. Nor did he shrink from describing the subsequent sacrifice for all. A straight up guy, left me speechless. All i could answer was a history of my forebears and their wanderings through these cold, Midwestern lands. Some young newbies to look after, so I'll stay, maybe go east of the river ...
> Aside from that, are there any other countries that you Hedgers recommend for expating to?
Ecuador comes recommended. Especially the city of Cuenca. Cheapest place to live well by some accounts. Decent medical services and climate too.
I'm a big fan of the Southern Hemisphere. Some Latin American countries look very attractive. Chile has one of the lowest population densities on Earth, 2000-mile long coast line and every climate range earth offers except for jungle with vast deserts, Andes mountains, sprawling countryside and Alpine mountain ranges in the deep south. Most of the population lives in the Santiago metropolitan area and 2-3 coastal enclaves.
Paraguay, Uruguay and Ecaudor all look good as well. If Argentina ever pulls its head out of its ass would be a viable option.
Latin culture suits my disposition. The food is good, they know their wines and I'm a sucker for brunettes. Learning Spanish might be a chore, but it'll keep the brain young.
My money's on Latin America.
It looks as though India has their own Hejira underway.
And there is no red line from India to the US?
Is that due to a sloppy chart, or are there really not many coming over?
And if there aren't that many coming over and there aren't that many here, then that combined with their suddenly heavy presence in the media would lend support to the claim that the Tribe who controls the media are trying desperately to get the Indians on their plantation, just as they have all the other minorities.
That would explain why we suddenly see Indians being slipped in everywhere (just like miscegenation) the media has a presence and a persuasion.
Don't bother watching it, your programming that is. Turn it off. Save your mind.
Tons of Polish immigrants are still pouring into Chicago.
everyone want to go to germany.
why not usa?
Because they don't know Germany well. It always looks nice from the outside, i.e. grass greener on other side. I was born there as a German and couldn't wait to get away from the corrupt and cheating Germans. Maybe the people they now invite fit right in.
It doesn't make a lot of sense to discuss migration waves without the excessive population growth of the last 50 years or so. Syria quadrupled their population, Pakistan and Bangla Desh tripled, etc. But the economies have not expanded accordingly so you get unemployment, idleness, group formation and boom the civil unrest leads to wars. Then the mega-corporations start to mingle and think they can take advantage of the situation and encourage governments to shoot a pipeline route free. Now the EU will break apart but if they are as idiotic as they are, they deserve to.
Walking to the US is a tad more complicated...
Behold The destruction of the western world...
Black Hole of Calcutta uberalles ?
Looks like Denmark, Germany and Italy need to introduce sex parties at work, to increase the population.
There's catch. 3 actually:
1. Sorry, ladies, no birth control.
2. If you're not having sex, you be working, to offset the reduced productivity of the sex pots.
3. Limited to those of Germanic or European ancestry only, or you'd be supporrting the Muzzies even more.
Can't speak for the Danes or Italians, but I do know that the Germans are full on board with this, if the government blesses it. "Wollen Sie bumsen, Frauelein/Frau ___? Fuer Deutschland."
Sounds a bit like Germany in the 30's and 40's. Only difference is the State is not propagandizing the Germans to produce they are propagandizing to accept migration instead. The pendulum always swings both ways. Sure would be more preferable if extremes didn't have to be reached before going to far the opposite way.
I taught my 13 year old nephew how to use " Duck.Duck. Go" today...
He's already buying gold,... ;-D
They hate us for our Freedums, but boy, they sure do lubb us for our "free" hand-outs.
I'd written off the white race. Don't see it surviving the next 200 years. Took that as a given. But I thought there was a residual hope the best ideas we were able to propegate would outlast us. How wrong I was. Now everywhere I look around me I see us betraying our own heritage, the foundational ideas of our own societies. Our own "elites" are selling us out for personal gain with cheering masses wildly cheering on the extinction of our culture. It's an assault on all fronts. Rich cunts at the mega banks are plundering the economy for the enrichment of their own funds and bonuses. Politicians are bought and sold like cheap whores. Millenials are so fucking clueless, anytime they pull their heads away from their immersive games they spout nonsense about micro aggressions, cultural appropration and the need to restrict free speech to protect them from evil words. What's left of our warrior class has been coopted into the military industrial complex and is being fed a load of horseshit about goatherders in caves. The rest of us are left to our own devices, either training our Indian replacements or competing on an international job market against Chinese or Vietnamese or Bangladeshis willing to work for next to nothing. But if you dare object you're painted as a racist close-minded bigot. Pffff......
We're fucked and there's no stopping it. Enjoy the long ride to the bottom while there's anything at all left to enjoy.
Nice assessment
Most millennial aren't into that SJW shit. We're as sick of it as you are. Maybe we do nothing, but you said it yourself, "We're fucked and there's no stopping it. Enjoy the long ride to the bottom while there's anything at all left to enjoy."
DR Bonzo, check this out....
'U. Louisville Prevents Asian and White Candidates from Applying for Physics Position"
http://collegeinsurrection.com/2015/12/u-louisville-prevents-asian-and-w...
"The lord tells me he can get me out of this mess, but he's pretty sure you're fucked."
The "lord" was wrong; we're all fucked! It's just that those preceived as guilty will be the lucky ones, dying quickly and first at the hands of those who will suffer longest...
https://youtu.be/_614-uf83YQ
We have too many humans on this planet. We humans are no longer improving our lot by increasing our numbers. We are too many for the resources, too many for energy and food production sustainability, and just too many for peace of mind. Every ounce of material mined, every drop of water pumped or diverted, every tree burned is now contributing to the destruction of our future. We have passed the tipping point.
If you think it’s now, wait about 15+ years when all the glaciers melt is in severe decline and the ground water come from wells 1000+ feet deep and full of old concentrated minerals/salts. The deaths will be in the 100s of millions. Study ground water worldwide and you will understand this is going to be a world wide problem. The water supplies on earth can only supply water and food to about 1/3 the current population. All the water and food being supplied today is possible only because of tens of thousands of years of the collection of ground water.
http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/environment/2015/12/10/how-unchecked...
http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/environment/2015/12/10/costs-perus-f...
http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/environment/2015/12/10/morocco-groun...
Multiplying our numbers on earth no longer accrues a benefit to any society. Bringing in immigrants no longer accrues to the benefit of any nation. Over population ruins the quality of life for everyone. Regardless of why, aberrant behaviors begin to multiply. There is no way to avoid or stop this.
Advanced, smarter populations know or feel this, perhaps subconsciously, which is why they have curbed their reproduction rates; some even going negative. However, all governments caught in the never ending fraud of their fiat currency/fractional lending/ponzi schemes cannot allow the population to shrink. The ponzi trap they conceived requires them to continue to artificially inflate everything. Never ending growth is their mantra. Huh, as if that were physically possible.
They are compelled by their own stupidity to import ever growing numbers of foreigners, legally or not. These foreign human imports come from third world countries where they are not educated enough, or intelligent enough, to realize the down side of over population. They do not understand the benefits of zero, or negative, growth.
From en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Calhoun
John B. Calhoun (May 11, 1917 – September 7, 1995) was an American ethologist and behavioral researcher noted for his studies of population density and its effects on behavior. He claimed that the bleak effects of overpopulation on rodents were a grim model for the future of the human race. During his studies, Calhoun coined the term "behavioral sink" to describe aberrant behaviors in overcrowded population density situations and “beautiful ones” to describe passive individuals who withdrew from all social interaction. His work gained world recognition. He spoke at conferences around the world and his opinion was sought by groups as diverse as NASA and the District of Columbia’s Panel on overcrowding in local jails. Calhoun's rat studies were used as a basis in the development of Edward T. Hall's 1966 proxemics theories.
Green as a religion.
Every single proposition you put out is wrong, beginning with "Multiplying numbers".
And as for Calhoun, people are not rats, and rat societies cannot be expected to be accurate models of human societies. In addition to which we are no place close to such densities except for environments such as prisons.
'theoriies' are not facts.
Apparently you've never met any politicians or .gov employees. people most certainly can be rats.
Reading your comment, I feel intelligence draining out of the world. It's clear we have entered the age of idiocracy.
and while you have those rose tinted glasses on, watch out for unicorns.
Let's never lose sight of the fact that the mass migration into Europe from the Middle East and Africa is fundamentally different from the usual migrations. This time it seems to be a deliberate attempt to destroy the social harmony that exists (generally speaking) in European nations. It's a kind of spillover of the dislocation of societies in the source nations, resulting from the European beachhead in Palestine (that is, the Israeli invasion and occupation of Arab lands) and the Western governments' determination to re-write the map of the whole region by means of perpetual warfare.
Here is a very brief blog-post from September that pretty much sums up the situation:
http://barlowscayman.blogspot.com/2015/09/europes-refugee-problem.html
What about Africa?
How about Zimbabwe? They are recruiting white farmers again. Beg pardon. They gave that up:- got no takers.
Now they grovel before new masters. Sorry wrong again, Kow Tow before their new masters.
Enjoy.
Life does have it's little pleasures.
The only viable African economy is Namibia. It's way off everyone's radar, low population, have avoided most of the pitfalls of other African banana republics. Have some friends in Mozambique they assure me they have their shit together. I'll give them benefit of the doubt, as far as that goes.
I'd give Africa a wide berth. Too many issues. Don't even know where to start. But yeah, if I ran out of options and my hand was forced, I'd go with Namibia or Mozambique.
madagascar might also be viable.
I have to say, the comments above mine are largely off base. "Decline of the white race" nonsense. Learn some genetics and practical breeding technology, OK? Now think of yourself as running your own bloodline's genetics program, a long-running selective breeding program.
Now, are you going to go for the pure-bred collie approach, developing an ever-longer-nosed breed with hip dysplasia, or the hybrid dog-wolf-coyote mongrel mixed species hybrid developing on the outposts of our urban culture just now. The maximally mongrel that eats collies for breakfast because they can't run fast enough, what with their hips and all, nor fight because that malformed skull can't bite very hard.
Many of us with brains go for brains. If you are good enough, you can have brains and beauty. I was, and our kid will walk away from yours in the selective sweepstakes in his generation. Interesting to watch the younger women around him at the Christmas party.
Go on, be proud of being white. How many generations do you think it will be before 'white' is 'half a standard deviation down in major mental measures'? Because the rest of us went on preferring brains and good judgment that bit more over the exact color of skin or our mother's ideal of physical beauty, and then our brains could have both next gen? Brains are clever that way.
You allow yourself to have opinions without evidence to support them. That is the base sin.
Worse, you betray your Neanderthal heritage. Where would we be if the Neanderthals had been as race-proud as you? Intelligently for a k-selected species of low populations at a time of climactic change, they cooperated fully in breeding themselves out of existence, a hybrid storm extinguishing their species. With the result that there are many hundreds of times as many Neanderthal genes in existence now than at the height of their population on earth. They traded their immunities to local diseases for Africa's modern-human wider combinations of earlier species and selection through more environments, larger population's ability to develop and maintain higher cultures with better tools.
We all won, which we know because we are here and having children with Neanderthal genes. So many species aren't in our genepool, each with capabilities lost to our future race. To reject any source of genetic diversity in our search for better brains and minds is foolish, your understanding of genetics cannot comprehend the reality.
A sin, I tell you. The kind of pride that goeth before an IQ fall.
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/09/22/the-case-for-neanderthal-s...
Your shit stinks just as much as mine.
Did you see me claim differently? I critiqued some other commenter's breeding programs because I thought the selection criteria were faulty and would have side-effects.
I am smart and I am proud of it, but it doesn't mean I am genetically superior in any racial sense, it means my bloodline is staying ahead of the mean, the Flynn effect is possibly real and likely genetic and very likely therefore selected for, good food and medicine, and therefore intelligence and beauty are much more determined by genetics. So my parents chose well, nothing for me to be proud of. My son is smart too, which doesn't prevent your kid from being even smarter. I made a good move, you maybe have made better. Good for you, tell us how you did that.
And we have to remember that by far more genius-level brains come from people without educations than those educated, just because there are so very many more of them, and genes are mixed and there are alleles we would all like to have everywhere, if we only knew how to evaluate them. None of my grandparents got more than an 8th grade eduacation, my mother was the first on either side of our family to finish college, my father never did. Worse, I am 1/4 Amish, the most inbred group in America, although of very pure European lineage, by far the purest strain of European in America.
Meanwhile, we have to do with our individual assessments and understanding, and most people don't grasp the importance of hybrid vigor and the need for different to achieve it.
Who cares? My point is we're all human.
Your writing reads as though you're special.
You aren't.
I never claimed I was special, just had a better understanding of genetics and was therefore winning this round of our evolutionary sweepstakes. Superior, I claimed I was superior and produced a superior son, by objective measures of mental attributes.
My genes are, as a set, unique in all of time, which makes me special. You too, of course, but it is an ordinary sort of special.
Those guys above are arguing they are superior because they are white, and you are down on me for bragging about my Neanderthal heritage? And being smarter? Both of which we could argue about in rational terms, I might point out, no need for the kind of discussion that a skin-tone-based metric will provoke.
Wrong emphasis, IMHO.
You're a fool to believe you're superior to other humans.
Each of us have our own unique traits, yours are no better than any others.
I may be able to multiply three digit numbers in my head but I'm unable to draw a round circle.
Smart isn't wise.
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2015-pig-breeding/
Are those pigs superior? "Depends on how you measure" is the answer. Is my son superior because of my expertise in selective breeding? "Depends on how you measure".
Do I claim for either of us superior brains, as compared against the average via an IQ test. Yes, I do.
Do I claim that gives him any powers superior to others? Yes, I do, he thinks better, that is what IQ does for you.
Do I claim that makes him superior in a legal context? No where do I do that for anyone.
You are not careful enough with words.
And again, you ignore the people claiming to be superior because their skin is white, but go after me because I know more about selective breeding theory and practice and am proud of my expertise. If I were a sports star, you would applaud the same level of skill.
And nobody grasps the importance of their Neanderthal Heritage, except for me, in the entire world, so far as I can find. My theorizing on the issue is truly profound, however ignored by antrhopologists. Proof of my genetic superiority, you will agree. It is not a normal mind that has such ideas.
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/10/31/african-advantage/
I don't understand the whole 'pure genes' thing...Anyone who raises animals knows that purebreeds of any species are less robust than those who freely exchange their genes. And intraspecies purebreeds are a phenomenon that does NOT exist in Nature...they only exist with active human interventions. Genetic 'purity' is a completely human notion, artificial, and contrary to Nature's plan.
Purebreeds are for shows...silly little animals that couldn't survive without their human handlers. They pass on the genes for 'glossy coats' right along with the genes that make them too delicate for survival in the real world.
The best plan for a species that wants to thrive is to expand their genetic 'base'...drawing from a plethora of sources. That is why 'new blood' is so important...species that become to inbred amongst themselves rapidly lose their strength, eventually they just die out, become so fragile that it doesn't take much to wipe them out. The same thing happens to them that happened to the European royal houses...they cousin-fucked until they nearly exterminated themselves with hemophilia and other genetic disorders. They couldn't bear the thought of breeding with commoners and diluting that 'blue blood'...After many generations of this nonsense we have folks like Prince Charles. Hardly an example of humanity's best, more like "Don't let this happen to YOUR family!"
And the idea that by blending your genes, you somehow 'exterminate' yourself is total nonsense. In fact, you are insuring the survival of your genes...does anyone think those genes care WHO carries them forward? That black daughter-in-law is just as competent to carry your family genes as a white one would be, and you'd be likely to get a few extras that come in handy at some point too. Keep it 'in the family' and over time your family will get smaller and smaller.
Genes do best when they can spread freely. And genes don't care who spreads them around. If a few insular whites won't do it, Nature will happily enlist your brown neighbors to do the job. You can either hop on board, or not. But if you don't, you will eventually be 'bred out' of the human gene pool. Which will be a shame, because the race, the HUMAN race, really does need you. Instead of seeing it as your own particular race 'dying out', try to see it as your race doing what it needs to survive. Your genes, making sure they get a seat on the train before it pulls out of the station
It is the 'mutts' that eventually take over
https://thinkpatriot.wordpress.com/2015/10/22/disease-threat/
That is why mutts win, the evolutionary arms race between disease and every other species.
Geneticists search the world for new pools of genetics for every commercial species in order to find resistance to disease, drought, etc. Genetic variability is valuable.
Humans are very inbred relative to our ape relatives and ancestors. It is not intelligent to reject those sources of genetic variability.
What I don't get is exactly why anyone who is childless cares. You aren't passing anything on so to be quite direct you are out of this discussion. For others who value the leisure time and peacefullness that came from the wellspring of western civilization, let me suggest that you get to breeding, networking and finding common ground for your children will inherit your legacy.
Fact is western Europeans are responsible for over 80% of scientific, artistic, engineering and philosophical innovations that ALL cultures enjoy today. Whine all you want but most cultures beg, borrow or stole from "whites". Now the sword cuts both ways so in as much good there has been much evil, but as far as knowledge and invention your european cousins (now commiting cultural and literal suicide) are whom you should thank.
And finally . . .
Before I begin, I'd like to start with some light humor with some intelligent debate over the terms we use. Before we talk about "white" lets define "white".
White - a human being with light skin
White - Balt - a specific genetic makeup of a people group currently with a majority comprising populations in Lithuania and some of Poland and Latvia?
Wait so you just want to throw the term out there because we all know what you mean right? Really, I beg to differ.
Seriously where is Whiteland? Anybody know of a nation state of peoples called Whiteland where they can trace their descendants?
Now for all of you less traveled I would argue that you will find very few people of Greek ancestry who will say that they are the same type of people as the Irish.
Even more I'd say that many Irish would have a serious problem if you said they were the same as the British.
And I dare you to tell a Russian scientist that he is of the same makeup, no better or worse than a shiftless
Apalachian meth head.
Tell a light skinned New Yorker from any borough that he is the same as the guys from Duck Dynasty and see if he doesn't wipe the floor with you.
And I dare you to tell a new migrant from Ghana or Nigeria that they are the same "blacks" as someone from the #3rd or 5th Ward in Houston, Texas. Just the same that person from Houston, Texas would have their own concept of their identity as seperate from the migrant.
What these terms on your tax form, black, white, hispanic, pacific islander, native american are about in America is a divide and conquer strategy that is as old as history.
I'm sorry people of light skin makeup less than 7% of the world population. It is not a homogenous group, in fact, it comprises a mixture of ethnic, religious and in fact tribal genetic markers that are quite unique.
Each of us, no matter what our intellect, background, race or religion must come to face the fact we have been conned.
Fighting about meaningless (relative to larger issues) notions of skin color rather than the larger issues of civilization.
Samuel Clemmons (Mark Twain) once remarked (paraphrasing) "its easier to to be fooled than admit you were fooled"
I very much agree, and that is why we should be proud of our Neanderthal Heritage. It reminds us that we are hybrids of hybrids of hybrids in every dimension of genetis and culture, and that is because it is the best strategy in evolutionary systems. You favor your genes by spreading them as widely as possible through the total population. That gives them the maximum scope for being favored in the selection sweepstakes and combining with the most favorable sets being selected as sets.
You do not favor your genes when they are mixed with a cousin's, you dysfavor them.
I always answer the ethnicity questions with 'American'.
Human.
Global citizen.
What I don't get is exactly why anyone who is childless cares.
People who create great ideas are more important than people who create little copies of themselves.
Ethnicity only matters in terms of culture. The greatest strength of western civilization is that hookers, booze and Hollywood will turn anyone western, as long as they are distanced from their parents and family at an early age.
Wicked men, you face The Tick!!!