China Is The New Japan After All: Here's How To Trade It

Tyler Durden's picture




 

In an odd coincidence, just as we were preparing an article showing how China is becoming increasingly more like Japan and how to trade this convergence, we happened to glance at the slide that Jeff Gundlach was talking about at that exact same moment during his afternoon presentation, and lo and behold, the "new bond king" was discussing why, among the reasons why "China may not bounce back", is that China is increasingly becoming a Japanese demographic doppelganger...

... in a slide that was sourced from, of all places, Zero Hedge.

So with that reflexive quandary out of the way, we go to the latest presentation by BofA's Michael Harnett, who among the 6 key investment themes and trades for 2016" lays out the "Black Dragon" as one of the key ones, and one whose core thesis is that "China, like Japan in the early-1990s, has entered a secular period of significantly slower economic growth, compounded greatly by debt deflation; like Japan in the 1990s, Chinese asset prices, currency, banks (Chart 5) and capital flows will periodically cause severe disruptions to global financial markets, even if China does not itself cause a global recession."

In other words, China is Japan, and not just demographically but financially as well.

This is what else Hartnett said:

China has de-pegged its currency from the US dollar: history is replete with illustrations of how major FX regime changes cause cross-asset volatility: Britain’s departure from the gold standard (1931), collapse of Bretton Woods system (1971-3), UK ending ERM membership (1992), Asia crisis (1997-8), the Euro (2000-). 

 

Why

 

China = Japan: China, like Japan in the early-1990s, has entered a secular period of significantly slower economic growth, compounded greatly by debt deflation; like Japan in the 1990s, Chinese asset prices, currency, banks (Chart 5) and capital flows will periodically cause severe disruptions to global financial markets, even if China does not itself cause a global recession.

 

Chinese devaluation: a cyclical collapse in export growth, extreme FX devaluations in recent years in Japan, Europe and across Emerging Markets, and capital flight, are all causing an accelerated devaluation of the Chinese yuan; BofAML forecast CNY6.9 and CNH7.0 by 2016 year-end; we see downside risk to these forecasts (n.b. PBoC has spent $200bn in reserves in past two months and yet the extent of private capital outflows means CNY has still fallen).

 

The great EM devaluation: until there is two-way risk in RMB, there is one-way risk in oil, commodities and EM; once Chinese exports begin to react positively to the cheaper currency, we think a bid is likely to return to Chinese and EM assets; until then, China asset prices are a threat to global asset prices (n.b. Chinese corporate bonds are at multi-year highs despite a credit crunch).

 

Ok, fine, China is the new Japan. How does one trade it?

Here are Hartnett's 5 proposed trades:

  • Long 6-month forward USD/CNH: for exposure to Chinese devaluation.
  • Long 3-month USD vs basket of KRW, TWD, MYR: for exposure to Chinese devaluation.
  • Long India 10-year bond: BofAML Asia strategists argue that weak commodity prices are positive for India; macro backdrop is still favorable for India bonds, inflation outlook benign, and they expect further monetary easing by the RBI (entry: 7.737%).
  • Short M2JP0EXE index: European exporters with EM exposure have sold-off sharply; Japanese exporters have yet to sell-off sharply (Chart 6).

  • Buy KOSPI forward volatility (KOSPI2 Jun-16/Jun-17 forward vol agreement): BofAML derivatives team recommends owning volatility via KOSPI; cheapest globally, high downside beta to global markets; favorable technicals in 2016; good hedge against HSCEI/China downside and/or global recession.

Then again, perhaps it is a good thing Hartnett said to short the CNH today and not yesterday; if anyone had shorted the currency yesterday when it was soaring hundreds of pips wider only to hit parity hours later, their trading career would be over right about now.

4
Your rating: None Average: 4 (3 votes)
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 01/12/2016 - 20:40 | 7038058 NoWayJose
NoWayJose's picture

And Just like Japan did, Chinese are buying US movie studios, property, farms, etc.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 20:51 | 7038108 Escrava Isaura
Escrava Isaura's picture

 

 

Article: China Is The New Japan After All: Here's How To Trade It

How about this for an article: Which Nation will not be Like Japan After All? Here’s How to Know It

 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:06 | 7038212 macholatte
macholatte's picture

I never get an answer to this question… one more time….

 

If USA and EU and China are all $14T economies, more or less, and

If growth for USA and EU at 3% is strong, then why should we expect

China to grow at 6% or 7%?

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:50 | 7038447 Vlad the Inhaler
Vlad the Inhaler's picture

Not all GDP is created equal, where does it come from and where does it go?  I would argue that in China the government policies are mostly geared towards creating growth, while in America a lot of it is geared towards creating wealth.

Wed, 01/13/2016 - 06:57 | 7039289 Nutsack
Nutsack's picture

Articles like this are why I read ZH, sadly they are becoming fewer and farther between.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 22:51 | 7038689 UncleChopChop
UncleChopChop's picture

to vastly oversimplify, but demonstrate the argument:

 

world of the jetsons: 4 citizens... average age, 40.  generate $10 gdp each

 

world of the flintstones: 10 citizens. average age 20. generate $4 gdp each.

 

on tuesday, the flintstones get the manual to the jetsons technology. who grows more now?

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 23:57 | 7038861 sapioplex
sapioplex's picture

Brilliant, except:

 

 

world of the jetsons: 4 citizens... average age, 40.  generate $10 gdp each

world of the flintstones: 16 citizens. average age 20. generate $2.50 gdp each.

Not only that, but there are other differences, like the historical precendent of the Chinese government controlling the rate or reproduction to avoid a boomer mess.  (If they can do that well over time.)

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:16 | 7038267 ISEEIT
ISEEIT's picture

How about this even then?

Which nation was sucessful in resisting international communism enforced by the 'victor' of WW3

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 20:57 | 7038146 NoDebt
NoDebt's picture

I'm going to take a moment for a small victory lap on this article.  My core thesis since I came to ZH has been that the entire developed world is becoming like Japan (mostly because of the insane debt, but also because of the "graying" if not outright decline in most developed nations' populations).

So let's tally this up real quick...

Japan = Japan

Europe = Japan, but with Muzzies flooding in

US = Japan, we just don't want to admit it yet, but it's already happened

And now... China = Japan

 

This is getting pretty damned close to everything in the industrialized world being Japan.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:08 | 7038222 Escrava Isaura
Escrava Isaura's picture

 

 

That is why the industrialized world is what it is while the developing nations had to follow market capitalism jammed at their throats.

 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:18 | 7038289 ISEEIT
ISEEIT's picture

You do realize this is a zoo right?

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:25 | 7038319 Escrava Isaura
Escrava Isaura's picture

 

 

A zoo?

Help me here. I am at a loss.

 

Wed, 01/13/2016 - 06:42 | 7039276 DownWithYogaPants
DownWithYogaPants's picture

Demographics of slowing reproduction cause this sort of thing.  It is not a inherently a bad thing

Governments force it to be a bad thing by their numbskull policies that can't stand for deflation because lord forbid they ever pay back their loans with a buck worth more than what they borrowed.

My guess is that it is a shift in reproductive strategy from r to K style. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory

IQ's while mostly fixed do go up with such a shift and that's why the voters in the USA are trending conservative/libertarian in the USA.

Lastly in a case of China I can't see they have a choice.  At north of a billion people how crowded can you expect them to want to get?  USA already has more then 320 million and I think that's too crowded.  I can not imagine 4x the people.  People are rightly deciding on their own that it is time for quality and not quantity.  Of course governments and the Ruling Class Oligarchy hate this and thus in the USA are importing voters / subjects that are more easily lead by a nose ring from countries with lower aggregate IQs.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 23:59 | 7038868 sapioplex
sapioplex's picture

I couldn't resist:  https://youtu.be/mgekmOqCFTU

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 20:58 | 7038154 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 This guy gets it... I was listening to PBS on my car radio earlier, and the clown in charge, was talking about record commercial real-estate prices. No <triple net> for you, and realized we're right back to late 1990's levels. With a fed balance sheet about $ 4.0 T larger.

 I can't wait to see the latest Acura, Lexus, Infinity, Chinese spinoffs. :-)

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:08 | 7038223 duo
duo's picture

Tha Japanese overpaid for golf courses and office buildings, then sold them for 10 cents on the dollar a decade later.

Chinese money is the marginal support for CA real estate.  Get out while you can.

Wed, 01/13/2016 - 01:30 | 7039029 roodeetoodee
roodeetoodee's picture

Well hold on, one of the talking heads with lickable legs on CNBC said that's what you do when you're powerful... buy content.

 

And CNBC is the shit, so STFU. 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 20:41 | 7038060 Budnacho
Budnacho's picture

I think Im turning Cantonese I really think so....

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 20:42 | 7038070 Newbie lurker
Newbie lurker's picture

Is this a big joke article because most whites can't tell the difference anyway?

Wed, 01/13/2016 - 01:35 | 7039032 roodeetoodee
roodeetoodee's picture

Japanese are hot and hairy. Chinese have bad teeth and are really fucking loud. ~Whitemans guide to the orient

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 20:50 | 7038105 Jason T
Jason T's picture

differance is productivity ..japanese were far more productive than the chinese.

the chinese build dormatories for workers.. in mass!

no other nation has ever done that.  Chinese have 500 million peasents to call upon to work and build things.  500 million!!  they work for crumbs and here's the kicker.. they are happy to do it!

china is a whole other beast and can't be compared to Japan.  

 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:27 | 7038141 Escrava Isaura
Escrava Isaura's picture

 

 

Because Japan is an Empire. China is in its way to become one……..Post collapse. You know, 500 million peasants.

 

 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:10 | 7038233 NoDebt
NoDebt's picture

So you're saying it's different this time?  I'll put $20 real fiat money on that action.

 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 20:50 | 7038106 FatTony7915726
FatTony7915726's picture

All asians look the same to me

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:46 | 7038433 thx111
thx111's picture

I have the same issue.  All white cauc-asian look the same to me.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:14 | 7038253 - - - - - -
- - - - - -'s picture

 

 

well actually koreans created the pizza  and spagetti  and jesus was korean

and the muslims stole the name koran from korea

the banking system is based on korean theories

the word "bank" is the european version of bangkoon 

chinese traditional writing was created by a korean

buddha was born in korea, travelled the world and died in korea

samsung created apple  and samsung invented iphone. then it sold iphone to apple

japanese and british commitied gonocide on 100 million korean housewifes

chinese criminal

jap criminal

kongyo kongyonida

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:15 | 7038262 Phillyguy
Phillyguy's picture

Japan still has one thing China does not- the continuing ecological/ financial disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plants, aka- the disaster that keeps on giving. It appears that Japanese PM Abe continues to hold his breath, hoping that Fukushima will magically disappear. Not only will this disaster cost Japan $ hundreds of billions and take decades to clean up, it also has potential long range liability issues for TEPCO and US based GE, which was involved in the design and construction of these reactors. Obviously, this could bankrupt GE.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:26 | 7038328 dchang0
dchang0's picture

China's got its own expensive ecological disasters: the massive widespread pollution of its water and air. That should cost more to correct than the localized Fukushima cleanup by an order of magnitude (imagine having to shut down all the factories near Beijing just to get air quality back to somewhat safe levels, and so on).

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:44 | 7038423 just the tip
Wed, 01/13/2016 - 01:42 | 7039037 roodeetoodee
roodeetoodee's picture

Yep KANZAI that you little fuckers.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:18 | 7038283 Peltast
Peltast's picture

China is the final challenge for the Judeo-American Empire.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 21:52 | 7038462 thx111
thx111's picture

China will never be the new Japan.  Because Chinese gov. is not a puppet of CIA like that of Japan.

China doesn't have to sacrafice its economy and people to save USD like Japan.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 23:18 | 7038776 Montani Semper ...
Montani Semper Liberi's picture

 The Chinese might not be in this position if they hadn't practiced Gendercide for the last 30+ years.

 In 2012, there were over 18 million more boys than girls under the age of 15 in China.

 In 2012, the national government estimated that China has 40 million more males than females.

 By 2020, the Chinese government estimates that there will be at least 30 million men of marriageable age that may be unable to find a spouse.

 In 2005, more than 1.1 million excess births of boys occurred.

 After the wife accepts tubal ligation upon bearing her only child, the lucky couple get an  “One-Child Parent Glory Certificate” suitable for framing and hannging with pride on the wall next to the portrait of Mao.

 It 's become a real sausage fest in China, and it will only get more festive in the coming years. 

Wed, 01/13/2016 - 00:05 | 7038875 sapioplex
sapioplex's picture

Didn't the Chinese just change this policy recently to allow for two children per couple?  I believe they did.  Very recent (1-2 months?)

Seems to me they're throttling their demographics using this policy, which is somewhat unique.  (I'm by no means well read on this kind of thing, but the only other practice I'm aware of like this was Spartans throwing imperfect babies off a cliff at birth.)

Wed, 01/13/2016 - 05:31 | 7039203 falak pema
falak pema's picture

And, Like the West since 2008... the big daddy, that has to chill its hyperconsumer model based on MIC big stick.

Wed, 01/13/2016 - 09:17 | 7039723 andrewp111
andrewp111's picture

There is one big difference btw China and Japan. China is big enough to go full retard imperialist and launch wars of conquest. Japan is not. Whereas Japan just stewed in its own juice, China could march armies across Eurasia and send huge fleets around the world.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!