What’s Next For Stocks After Record New Year Week 1 Hangover?

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Via Dana Lyons' Tumblr,

U.S. stocks logged the worst week ever to kick off a new year; is this historically low reading on the “January Barometer” a bad omen going forward?

Last Monday, we posted a piece regarding what was one of the worst year-opening days ever for stocks. In it, we looked at prior years that saw very weak days to open the year to see what it might mean (if anything) going forward. Well, it must have been some New Year’s Eve party because the hangover persisted for the entire week. In fact, it was the worst opening week to a year for stocks in U.S. market history.

That distinction is based on the loss in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) of -6.19% last week, the worst since 1900. Some market observers would argue that this performance portends bad things for the stock market over the rest of the year, according to the “January Barometer” indicator based on the 1st 5 days of the year. As with last Monday’s post, we took a look at previous poor weeks to open a new year to see if they led to any consistent behavior in the stock market going forward. Specifically, we looked at all 1st week losses of at least 2% in the DJIA since 1925. As it turns out, there were 9 prior such cases:

1934 -2.96%
1939 -2.08%
1955 -2.17%
1962 -3.03%
1969 -2.38%
1977 -2.14%
1978 -5.61%
1991 -4.72%
2008 -5.09%
2016 -6.18%

The DJIA’s performance following these poor first weeks was a mixed bag, although there was more bad than good. This chart shows the performance through year-end of each of the years following the first week.

 

image

 

As the chart illustrates, there were a few occurrences when the DJIA went on to have a very good year, 1991 and 1955, in particular. There were also some bad years, especially 2008 which happened to be the previous record-holder for the worst opening week to a year, at -5.09%. It would close the year down another -30.3% from that opening week. Along the way, average and median returns were muted, with a few more negative periods than positive overall. As it happens, the best-performing period following the weak 1st weeks was the period through the end of January, as the following table shows.

image

With a sample size of just 9 years, it is difficult to have much confidence in any predictive patterns here, especially as there was a fair amount of variance. The only thing we can say is that, for the majority of years, returns were lackluster at best. So, at the very least, we cannot say there was a strong tendency for the market to snap back strongly, even if it is still a reach to call this a bad omen for the rest of 2016.

One interesting note is that 6 of the prior 9 examples occurred during secular (i.e., long-term) bear markets. It is our view that U.S. stocks remain in the post-2000 secular bear, despite the past 3 years’ performance of the S&P 500. Therefore, the start to this year would not be totally out of character if we are correct, though the extent of the losses obviously are unprecedented.

So is there any real takeaway here? Probably nothing that is actionable, no. Perhaps it would not surprise to get a bit of a bounce back during this month before a lackluster performance over the remainder of the year. That is mere speculation, though. If you want to worry about something in this market, we have provided plenty of material for that over the last several month, or years. This New Year’s hangover, however, would be at the bottom of that list.

*  *  *

More from Dana Lyons, JLFMI and My401kPro.

0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:01 | 7034571 BlueStreet
BlueStreet's picture

VIX is down 20% in two days, S&P up 1%. That's a tradeoff the bears will take any day. They're playing right into their hands. 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:22 | 7034663 StackShinyStuff
StackShinyStuff's picture

Seems like TR's are being FS

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:43 | 7034713 Bokkenrijder
Bokkenrijder's picture

More QE soon? Stocks higher?

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:25 | 7034679 BandGap
BandGap's picture

Why are my miners getting hammered? If I didn't know better I'd think this was intentional.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 11:09 | 7034890 hobopants
hobopants's picture

They're going to continue trading sideways, making for another boring ass year.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:48 | 7034785 Angel_Eyes
Angel_Eyes's picture

My last month paycheck was for 11000 dollars... All i did was simple online work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the internet and they paid me for it 95 bucks every hour... Try it yourself... www.wallstreet34.com

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:03 | 7034590 Mark Mywords
Mark Mywords's picture

S&P 2000 again before anything else negatively affecting stawks is allowed to occur.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:13 | 7034631 DeadFred
DeadFred's picture

I covered my longer term permabear postions with a short term bull position yesterday because when we've been here before us bears had their faces ripped off by a squeeze, each one recorder than the last one. Will this one be recorderest? If so and it's followed by a plunge I will smile :)

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:16 | 7034650 Mark Mywords
Mark Mywords's picture

I upvoted you merely for the use of "recorderest" and "recorder".

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:19 | 7034654 nink
nink's picture

Suckers 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:03 | 7034593 konputa
Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:09 | 7034619 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

The Ghost of 1929 called. He said this market will be haunted by three spirits.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:09 | 7034620 youngman
youngman's picture

I bet Dennis Gartman knows...ask him

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:26 | 7034687 BandGap
BandGap's picture

Gartman is a clueless fucker.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:10 | 7034621 Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

TWTR and SHAK are screaming buys!  If you ever wanted to invest in vaporshares this is your opportunity!

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:12 | 7034630 surf0766
surf0766's picture

A massive push higher by the progressives for their leader before he takes the throne forever

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:14 | 7034644 Mark Mywords
Mark Mywords's picture

You're a funny guy. As if true "progressives" would even want a stock market.

Taking the throne forever is something whackos have been claiming for every president since Bill Clinton. Perhaps earlier, but the Internet didn't exist then, so who knows what those whackos from back then were thinking.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:14 | 7034643 yogibear
yogibear's picture

As soon as Gartman opens his mouth about shorting the markets reverse and go strongly positive.

Wrong-way Gartman.

He's been very accurate.

Call it the reverse-Gartman trade. A profitable one.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:15 | 7034646 Rainman
Rainman's picture

The boyz need another i-something to revive animal spirits

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:22 | 7034667 Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

I hear the new iPhone will change from rounded edges from pointy edges. 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:19 | 7034653 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

Stawks will go wherever TPTB want them to go.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:19 | 7034655 new game
new game's picture

history based on manipulation? ah, so ironic...

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:26 | 7034685 Hohum
Hohum's picture

Could bounce back.  Check out January/early February 2014.

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 10:27 | 7034693 MFL8240
MFL8240's picture

Up 800 Dow points why not, none of it real anyhow!

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 11:58 | 7035156 RabbitOne
RabbitOne's picture

I am an old school trader and investor. I go by longer term support and resistance in the composite indexes. The thing I don’t like about the current market is the NYSE Composite index (NYA) is trying hard to break below the August and September lows of 2015. This to me is a very negative if it indeed closes below those lows on a weekly basis. If that happens I may go net short the market on a gradual increasing basis. 

Tue, 01/12/2016 - 12:32 | 7035417 Lost in translation
Lost in translation's picture

The thing I don't like about this market is that there is no free market; the game is rigged.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!