Former Federal Prosecutor Says Hillary Clinton Could Be Indicted Within 60 Days (Or FBI Will Revolt)
Submitted by AnonWatcher via TheAntiMedia.org,
The leaking of the Clinton emails has been compared to as the next “Watergate” by former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova this week, if current FBI investigations don’t proceed in an appropriate manner. The revelation comes after more emails from Hilary Clinton’s personal email have come to light.
“[The investigation has reached] a critical mass,” DiGenova told radio host Laura Ingraham when discussing the FBI’s still pending investigation. Though Clinton is still yet to be charged with any crime, DiGenova advised on Tuesday that changes may be on the horizon. The mishandling over the classified intelligence may lead to an imminent indictment, with DiGenova suggesting it may come to a head within 60 days.
“I believe that the evidence that the FBI is compiling will be so compelling that, unless [Lynch] agrees to the charges, there will be a massive revolt inside the FBI, which she will not be able to survive as an attorney general,” he said.
"The intelligence community will not stand for that. They will fight for indictment and they are already in the process of gearing themselves to basically revolt if she refuses to bring charges."
The infamous emails documented extrajudicial killings by the U.S. allied rebels, and substantiated motives for warring with Libya as underlined by energy resources, gold, and silver.
One email dated 2011 describes in the strictest confidence “One rebel commander stated that his troops continue to summarily execute all foreign mercenaries captured in the fighting.” It continues to describe the training that some rebels received from the Egyptian Special Forces units, while French Operations troops worked along the Libyan border from Egyptian bases. “These troops are overseeing the transfer of weapons and supplies to the rebels.”
Amnesty International, in 2012, had reported on their discovery of militia (rebel) abuses of civilians and anyone potentially associated with the Gadhafi regime. In a report, it documented torture and abuse of detainees in militia-run facilities: whips, cables, and plastic hoses were used to beat the detainees who were also subjected to electrical shocks.
DiGenova emphasized the seriousness of Clinton’s situation during the interview. “I believe that that charges must be brought by Attorney General Loretta Lynch,” he explained, “[If Lynch chooses not to indict Clinton] It will be like Watergate. It will be unbelievable.”
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -



Shape shifting aliens? I have never hear him talk about that in anyway other than him saying that he doesn't believe in it. He has had David Ike on the show and David does believe in that but Alex has said many times that he does not. Perhaps you can show a little evidence to support your claim. If anything Glenn Beck is trying to be Alex 2.0 you know because Alex has been on the scene much longer than Beck.
Word
Mate, any presidential pardon will be reversed once The Donald proves that Barry Soetoro was ineligible to be president, thus rendering all his decisions nul and void.
Unless he takes a bullet first.
Yikes, but you might be right.
GOD, I hope so. But I really believe Trump is the ultimate controlled opposition.
Rand Paul is the only one running without bankster puppet strings.
What about those Goldman Sachs puppet strings, I think more research is in order ;)
hahahahahahah
https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1278&bih=629&q=rand+paul%2C+wailing+wall&oq=rand+paul%2C+wailing+wall&gs_l=img.3...984.7795.0.8044.23.11.0.12.3.0.198.1300.5j6.11.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..10.13.1121.ESV6vijfix4
It's nice that the Clinton Foundation will be major funding donor.
@VinceFostersGhost - What say you on the matter?
Screw the bitch.
You first...I'll be right at the back of that particular queue.
"On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron". H L Menchen
It would be interesting to watch, that's for sure.
Haus, when you're in a situation like we are currently where all that's left is bread and circuses, I want Ringling Bros. finest and some damned tasty bread.
I like a lot of Trump's rhetoric, but let's not diefy the guy just yet. I have been burned too many times by politicians to trust any of them. Don't get your hopes up. I think we as a nation are too far down the rabbit hole for a politician to turn it around now.
I've never been a fan boy for Trump. I just like that he pisses off the PC Police. And George Soros HATES him. That counts for a lot in my book.
This is true. When both the Clintons, Bushs & Soros hates someone --- he has to be doing something correctly.
Trumps business model is based on a strong middle class with disposable income. Not just .01% of the population having money. He sees his businesses losing over the long term by a continuation of a weakening of the middle class. A strong America is good for his business. He is centered in America with a little exposure over seas. His core is in the USA. I have been hearing from members of the NYC Steamfitters and Iron workers Unions that they will be supporting Trump over Hillary. We will see.
First, I like that you've got the decimal point in the right place (0.01% instead of 1%). That's a distinction which needs to be hammered; the 0.99% is still the upper middle class, especially after the Fed's QE to infinity and beyond has demolished what little value the USD had left.
Second, that is a valid point about Trump. It actually gives me just a little bit of hope. Maybe he's awakened from his leftist, Clinton-loving daydream to realize that the true goal of all 'progressive' ideology is the formation of a global, nationless neofeudal plantation - and that he will not be joining the Rothschilds on Olympus.
I still think Rand is the only one running without bankster puppet strings. But your point about Trump's business model gives me a small glimmer of hope. Thanks.
Trump told the Zionist Jews straight up that he doesn't need their money so he can't be bought, and he gets booed for it.
That's why I know, he is for real.
All other politicians, including Rand Paul, have grovelled and sucked up to the Zionists. As for Rand not having puppet strings, that was too funny.
I recommend you look up and do some research on Rand sucking up to Zionism.
I know someone who has worked for both Pauls' campaigns. We've spent a fair bit of time chatting about Rand's strategy and outlook.
Rand has merely been trying to not give the oligarchy an excuse to paint him with the kook brush, like they did with his dad.
Rand knows the real score. I promise.
So far as Trump, you want to talk about a connected insider?!
Problem -> Reaction -> Solution
Special Interests own the Democrats and the Republicans , but I strongly doubt they control Trump.
At least with Trump there's some hope he will fix the country , with the other candidates there's none, so the logical thing to do is vote Trump.
Haus, trump isn't a politician. ND, I don't see how Germany is in much of a different state than the US; arguably worse.
You were holding your own until you started letting the Muzzies flood in. Now you're definitely losing altitude.
I am not sure how that makes sense. I didn't let anyone in and I would definately argue against blind immigration. People need to realize that we had a stop on immigration for about three decades in the 20th century. Further. I have been on I-10 enough to tell you that the McDonalds in Junction, TX is probably about 95% full of Central and Southern American's. I do not travel in South or West Texas without a firearm.
You may recall the respiratory virus, which likely originated from immigrants about two years ago. I have never been so miserable in my life as when I had a screaming infant for three days. Seriously, my wife and I literally said we would have preferred to hospitalize him. Perhaps Obama should pick up the bill for that.
Sorry, the way you phrased your original post I thought you were implying you were in Germany. My mis-read.
I would like to see a return to the pre-1954 immigration overhaul that has lead us to this point.
troubledasset - I agree
Germany has the fat lady shoving the globalist shit down Europes throat while the Media covers for her and we have Obama.
Define "OK." What a sad commentary it is that America's two largest political parties can't (won't) come up with better candidates.
Hey, here's an idea! Why don't we form the Constitution Party?
'We' already did...25 years ago: Constitution Party. Their direct web site is down ATM, not a shining endorsement. It used to be called the US TaxPayers Party, which it still is in MI: http://ustpm.org/. The MI affiliate has had problems getting the SoS to allow them to change their party name to match that of the parent org.
Addendum: On a Red vs. Blue (charade) note, those problems existed when we had a Blue governor, and I thought maybe after we got a Red governor there was hope that the new SoS might allow that name change to occur. Apparently, she has not. Just another bit of annecdotal evidence that politics in what's left of the republic is purple, not red or blue. "It's a big club..." and all that.
Me too. Libertarian candidate may win, finally.
No possible L could be as bad as any of the current field, much less Israeli-Neocon Trump and soft-on-Israel Bernie.
Naah, Goldman Sachs will throw in the Biden / Warren ticket.
Trump called him a "socialist communist maniac" .. what he is.
If she isn't indicted it's Trump and Clinton. What's the difference?
Even better, Trump picks Sanders as his running mate. Wouldn't that be a hoot.
If Trump is so good at telling it like it is, he should just say there's no difference between the parties anyway, so just vote for him.
And, if she is indicted and Trump wins the Republican nomination, I think well before Trump v Saunders we can popcorn-watch the meltdown of the both party's establishment sociopaths.
I say GOOD.
If Trump looks like winning he'll be shot.
Nah.
He just gets sat down first day in the Oval Office and is told in no uncertain terms who is actually in charge.
After that point failure to comply and he will probably get shot (JFK).
I think it would take some concrete anti fed actions from him in order for them to Ronnie him
"If she is indicted, its Trump v Sanders.
Let that sink in everyone."
No way... Amtrak Joe will the Dem nominee. They're stupid, but they ain't that dumb.
No. Inside word is Biden will step in. Watch
No. Inside word is Biden will step in. Watch
It's gonna be a doozy! Out first A)psycho bitch or B) tribesman Command In Chief... oy vey
NOTICE: This post is (K)
So that's a reason NOT to indict a traitorous liar? Hang 'em high, and let the chips fall where they may! Er, WTF, just hang them all.
I think the Donald could take him in the ring...
Nope. Uncle Joe will have an excuse to run. Lynch will be unleashed.
@HT,
T vs S?
Who's got more money, the Donald or Soros?
Soros is backing Bernie.
the US & EU Power Structure
http://thesaker.is/scotts-rant-january-10th-2016/
This just makes me smile....please pull the trigger.