President Obama's Iran Policy Explained (In 1 Cartoon)

Tyler Durden's picture




 

"Hands Up... Don't Nuke"?

 

 

Source: Investors.com

2.458335
Your rating: None Average: 2.5 (24 votes)
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sat, 01/16/2016 - 16:51 | 7056056 souljaboy
souljaboy's picture

It's almost as if he actually wants to weaken America. That's odd.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:06 | 7056087 wee-weed up
wee-weed up's picture

Is Obozo buggering Uncle Sam?

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:11 | 7056098 TeamDepends
TeamDepends's picture

Nah, Barry would be grabbing his ankles in that situation.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 18:58 | 7056349 macholatte
macholatte's picture

Fundamental Transformation

Change You Better Believe In

 

“In the face of impossible odds, people who love this country can change it.”
  -- Barack Obama

 

“You can put lipstick on a pig. It's still a pig.”
-- Barack Obama

 

 

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 19:43 | 7056535 I am more equal...
I am more equal than others's picture

 

 

The only thing missing from the cartoon is a pile of shit and assorted flies at the knees of O-bummer

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 19:52 | 7056559 HowdyDoody
HowdyDoody's picture

Surprise, surprise, more Ramirez shite passed off as humor

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:12 | 7056100 Jurgster
Jurgster's picture

The US-Israeli Relationship explained in 1 photo => wp.me/p4OZ4v-7x

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 18:41 | 7056302 T.Gracchus
T.Gracchus's picture

Jurgster:-Great photo- but didn't you think the Obama-dog looked a bit fierce- should have been a toy-poddle,no?

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 19:15 | 7056425 Jurgster
Jurgster's picture

Thought it was right on :-)

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 20:05 | 7056597 exi1ed0ne
exi1ed0ne's picture

I ain't clicking that shit. Put the real URL or don't bother.

Sun, 01/17/2016 - 12:07 | 7058171 nc551
nc551's picture

Yeah 2 week old account with every post including a trackable link to click on.  Up to something.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:28 | 7056108 Ignatius
Ignatius's picture

He must mean neocon, propagandist cartoonist Ramirez.

I'll take a night in Iran over Abu Ghraib.  Hell I'd take 444 nights, for that matter.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:39 | 7056165 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

Ramirez does suck. Why Tyler posts his garbage on here is a mystery.

Well, at least we chased off BBH's Marc to Market and his Wall St. propaganda.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:46 | 7056177 Goliath Slayer
Goliath Slayer's picture

It's not a mystery. ZH is a Zio-op. Why do you think they always have Refugee Rapists and Terrorists here? Always slammed right at the top to drive traffic. To Demonize Muslims and make Apartheid IsraHell and Zionists look good. Same with this cartoon.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 18:23 | 7056247 indygo55
indygo55's picture

"ZH is a Zio-op"

 

Ummm I don't know. ZH keeps the anti FED stories coming pretty strong and we all they are the heart of the evil empire. So maybe YOU are the controlled opposition to inject doubt. EH?

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 19:24 | 7056459 Goliath Slayer
Goliath Slayer's picture

Are you really that dolt?

Controlled opposition to ZH?

No ZH is controlled opposition to the FED.

ZH is just a site that pumps out "news". Since when does a news site have controlled opposition? Are you a ZH intern troll? Only one can be that stupid.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 22:26 | 7056979 indygo55
indygo55's picture

You are here two weeks so STFU. You have no cred.

I didnt say ZH is controlled op to the FED you fucking idiot.

 

Sun, 01/17/2016 - 08:06 | 7057549 NoGodsNoMasters...
NoGodsNoMastersNoMotherland's picture

Thats a false premiss, its not the heart of the evil empire, so its no measurement for anything in this regard.

 

Inject doubt is controlled oppostiton eventually ? You have no clue what CO truely is buddy. Of course ZH has a certain agenda, its obvious, you would reognize that if you would inform you in a broader spectrum. Therefor you need just a week to see that....

Sun, 01/17/2016 - 08:02 | 7057548 NoGodsNoMasters...
NoGodsNoMastersNoMotherland's picture

You re right, its prett sad how much folks believe this crap.

 

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 18:28 | 7056253 PhilofOz
PhilofOz's picture

I love ZH but this rabid Zionist type of anti-Iran stuff is becoming too much and will drive away many if it keeps up. It does reveal something about those running the show though. I wonder when posts will start consistently disappearing and posters of even minor criticism of Israel policies start to be banned?

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 19:03 | 7056387 TuPhat
TuPhat's picture

What was anti Iran in that cartoon?  The US mercenaries screwed up and Uncle Sam pays for it.  That's what I got out of it.  ZH is not rabid zionist but some posters are rather rabid and anti common sense.  They are usually hate everything types.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 19:16 | 7056431 PhilofOz
PhilofOz's picture

Perhaps you have not been paying attention to the near hysterical articles here over the past few months about this Iran nuclear deal going through. This cartoon is as you say nothing by itself but is just a continuation of all those earlier efforts. Meanwhile we just ignore the country with as many as 200 nuclear weapons pointed at friend and foe alike and quite insane enough to use their "Samson Option"

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 20:26 | 7056669 Oldwood
Oldwood's picture

With so much love and respect for Iran, I'm surprised we don't have more immigration from the west to Iran. I though Iran was supposedly trying to stop the radicals in ISIS, and as such, these escaping refugees should be clamoring to get there to the Iranian open arms. Why are not all of these embattled refugees not racing to the loving arms of Iran??

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 18:54 | 7056352 Baby Bladeface
Baby Bladeface's picture

"

Ramirez does suck."

His crayonic scrawlings do exude the stench of cheap propaganda. Credit where due, the guy can color inside the lines. Just he exhibits cerebral jaundice, a shallow depth of ability to critical thinking. His cartoons unsurprisingly display cartoonish world view.

"Why Tyler posts his garbage on here is a mystery."

I did wondered that myself. Won't conjecture on it though, not worth it the risk to getting from this site kicked.

Must have some good reason and I am not enough smart to know.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 20:39 | 7056705 Oldwood
Oldwood's picture

 

never fucking mind

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:19 | 7056127 BullyBearish
BullyBearish's picture

Just think what would've happened if they violated Turkish waters...

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 18:59 | 7056371 Enki Anu
Enki Anu's picture

These two boats were sent on the 11'th hour to derail the agreement of the Neuclear deal. Guess what ! It failed.
They don't need nukes, they already have the anti gravity technology and related weapons handed to them by keshefoundation.org as of 2008.
Check it out and ask your Representative as why we do not use it.
We were also given the know how in November 2012.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 20:13 | 7056581 Libertati Aut A...
Libertati Aut Ad Mortem's picture

OK, let me see if I can explain it to you.  First, the United States is a proxy Zionist state run directly out of the Council on Foreign Relations.  Second, the pivot to Iran via the nuclear treaty and this faux paper tiger event is an indication that the United States will not intevene in the Middle East.  This whole charade for many years has been to destabilize the Middle East including Iraq, Libya Egypt, and Syria.  The next goal of the Zionist CFR is to start a war between Shiite Iran and Wahhabi Saudi Arabia.   No one has much love loss for the Wahhabi Saudis who have been screwing the American peope via Opec for decades.  However, this foray towards creating a war for the Zionist controlled United States hegemony over the Middle East between these two power, not unlike the Iran-Iraq war, might be ill-advised.  I could explain more, but I am out of time for now.  You will need to figure the rest out on your own.  Godspeed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUCwCgthp_E&index=11&list=WL

Oh and btw, Xi is headed over to try to stop this war.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3400959/Chinas-Xi-visit...

 

 

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 16:52 | 7056057 Xibalba
Xibalba's picture

They got the Magrav tech and shut down the boats.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 16:52 | 7056058 Golden Showers
Golden Showers's picture

That's Bait.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 16:53 | 7056059 ConfederateH
ConfederateH's picture

Tyler to America:  Fuck Yeah

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:17 | 7056118 Amun
Amun's picture

"US treatment of native Americans in hte century or more after independence bore all the hallmarks of what we call today ethnic cleansing.....In the 20th century there have been 180 instances of the use of US armed forces abroad in situations of military conflict or potential conflict..." Stephen Burman 

The State of the American Empire: How the USA Shapes the World
Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:42 | 7056169 Quasi
Quasi's picture

Hey, not our fault they failed to develop a written language capable of sustaining a viable civilization. Guys wearing rags and feathers living next door to guys who can build factories is never going to work out for the former. It would happen regardless whether the advanced society were peaceful hippies or genocidal maniacs.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 18:28 | 7056254 rejected
rejected's picture

"Guys wearing rags and feathers living next door to guys who can build factories is never going to work out for the former."

Well the USSA has the rags and feathers covered...  Now,,, who has the factories....

Your are correct.

 

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 21:14 | 7056806 Quasi
Quasi's picture

Too true. See you on the reservation!

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 18:47 | 7056330 T.Gracchus
T.Gracchus's picture

Shame the US doesn't still build factories that actually make stuff - instead of just giant techie sheds full of nerds and hipsters trying to persuade us the future is in loss-making fantasy companies. 

At least the Injuns traded something useful like furs ina sustainable way. 

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 19:07 | 7056394 TuPhat
TuPhat's picture

I get what you mean but I don't think they actually managed to sustain it.  So something went wrong for them in that regard.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 20:46 | 7056729 12357111317
12357111317's picture

They were "sustaining" just fine.  They just hadn't had an agricultural revolution, and therefore industrial revolution, and therefore weapons revolution, so they couldn't muster enough soldiers or firepower.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 20:44 | 7056721 12357111317
12357111317's picture

Maybe, but from what I have read it appears that many of the North Native Americans had societies that had a lot more individual freedom.

And the Central Americans did have books, but the Europeans burned them.  Hitler didn't invent book burning; he just adopted it.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 16:53 | 7056062 debtor of last ...
debtor of last resort's picture

Where are the dogs and the orange burka's?

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 16:55 | 7056063 Urban Redneck
Urban Redneck's picture

Ramirez's political proclivites are well known. However, in this case, I think Butt Boy and Ketchup Boy may have actually upped their game to a heretofore unseen respectable level.    

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 16:58 | 7056075 Soul Glow
Soul Glow's picture

Iran isn't the problem despite the MSM rhetoric.  The House of Saud is the problem.  Iran wasn't involved in 9/11 - and neither was Iraq or Afganistan - the hijackers were Saudis.  Iran isn't where ISIS is coming from.  That would be Saudi Arabia and Turkey, trained and armed.

The MSM spins the Iran is bad thing because Iran is the House of Sauds natural born enemy going back a thousand years to the split of Islam.  Sunni and Shite.  And we backed the House of Saud because they had oil and it was in an easy to control region, unlike Iran which is surrounded by big name bnation-states like Pakistan, China, and Russia.  So we backed the House of Saud, which is a kingdom and the farthest thing from a democracy, bought their oil on the cheap, sold them weapens, and they bought our USTs.  

That's it.  That's the story.  Don't believe the MSM.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:03 | 7056080 Magnum
Magnum's picture

MSM wants us to believe 9/11 was Saudis too. 

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:06 | 7056085 Soul Glow
Soul Glow's picture

Well it was, and that info came out years later - on the MSM at least, you and I knew it was Saudi trained men from right away.

And if you are refering to a rouge network, a shadow government, then yes you are correct there too.  But the House of Saud is involved in that rouge network, mind you.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:12 | 7056102 Contrariologist
Contrariologist's picture

Well, at least with a rouge network, all those rogues will have nice pink cheeks.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:07 | 7056089 TeamDepends
TeamDepends's picture

Silverstein doesn't sound very Saudi.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 17:43 | 7056171 Quasi
Quasi's picture

Depends on if you believe the stories about the House of Saud's lineage.

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 18:34 | 7056278 blue51
blue51's picture

TeamD... THAT is a good one !

Sat, 01/16/2016 - 19:40 | 7056528 Cruel Aid
Cruel Aid's picture

Pull it!... bingo

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!