President Obama's Iran Policy Explained (In 1 Cartoon)
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
-
01/17/2016 - 08:26
-
01/17/2016 - 09:21
Audio Commentary From RanSquawk:
01-18 3:39: Notable metals news from overnight...
01-18 3:39: Profit taking in GBP; Cable held 2010 lows
01-17 18:36: Avon Products to hold an investor day
01-15 18:51: Apple to shut down iAd App Nework as of June 30
01-15 18:18: Novartis receives two new FDA approvals for Cosentyx
01-17 18:24: 10 Stocks Moving On Friday's After-Hours Session
01-17 18:24: More Big Banks In The Earnings Spotlight
01-17 18:24: Earnings Expectations: Will GE And IBM Disappoint?
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
How to report offensive comments
It's almost as if he actually wants to weaken America. That's odd.
Is Obozo buggering Uncle Sam?
Nah, Barry would be grabbing his ankles in that situation.
Fundamental Transformation
Change You Better Believe In
“In the face of impossible odds, people who love this country can change it.”
-- Barack Obama
“You can put lipstick on a pig. It's still a pig.”
-- Barack Obama
The only thing missing from the cartoon is a pile of shit and assorted flies at the knees of O-bummer
Surprise, surprise, more Ramirez shite passed off as humor
The US-Israeli Relationship explained in 1 photo => http://wp.me/p4OZ4v-7x
Jurgster:-Great photo- but didn't you think the Obama-dog looked a bit fierce- should have been a toy-poddle,no?
Thought it was right on :-)
I ain't clicking that shit. Put the real URL or don't bother.
Yeah 2 week old account with every post including a trackable link to click on. Up to something.
He must mean neocon, propagandist cartoonist Ramirez.
I'll take a night in Iran over Abu Ghraib. Hell I'd take 444 nights, for that matter.
Ramirez does suck. Why Tyler posts his garbage on here is a mystery.
Well, at least we chased off BBH's Marc to Market and his Wall St. propaganda.
It's not a mystery. ZH is a Zio-op. Why do you think they always have Refugee Rapists and Terrorists here? Always slammed right at the top to drive traffic. To Demonize Muslims and make Apartheid IsraHell and Zionists look good. Same with this cartoon.
"ZH is a Zio-op"
Ummm I don't know. ZH keeps the anti FED stories coming pretty strong and we all they are the heart of the evil empire. So maybe YOU are the controlled opposition to inject doubt. EH?
Are you really that dolt?
Controlled opposition to ZH?
No ZH is controlled opposition to the FED.
ZH is just a site that pumps out "news". Since when does a news site have controlled opposition? Are you a ZH intern troll? Only one can be that stupid.
You are here two weeks so STFU. You have no cred.
I didnt say ZH is controlled op to the FED you fucking idiot.
Thats a false premiss, its not the heart of the evil empire, so its no measurement for anything in this regard.
Inject doubt is controlled oppostiton eventually ? You have no clue what CO truely is buddy. Of course ZH has a certain agenda, its obvious, you would reognize that if you would inform you in a broader spectrum. Therefor you need just a week to see that....
You re right, its prett sad how much folks believe this crap.
I love ZH but this rabid Zionist type of anti-Iran stuff is becoming too much and will drive away many if it keeps up. It does reveal something about those running the show though. I wonder when posts will start consistently disappearing and posters of even minor criticism of Israel policies start to be banned?
What was anti Iran in that cartoon? The US mercenaries screwed up and Uncle Sam pays for it. That's what I got out of it. ZH is not rabid zionist but some posters are rather rabid and anti common sense. They are usually hate everything types.
Perhaps you have not been paying attention to the near hysterical articles here over the past few months about this Iran nuclear deal going through. This cartoon is as you say nothing by itself but is just a continuation of all those earlier efforts. Meanwhile we just ignore the country with as many as 200 nuclear weapons pointed at friend and foe alike and quite insane enough to use their "Samson Option"
With so much love and respect for Iran, I'm surprised we don't have more immigration from the west to Iran. I though Iran was supposedly trying to stop the radicals in ISIS, and as such, these escaping refugees should be clamoring to get there to the Iranian open arms. Why are not all of these embattled refugees not racing to the loving arms of Iran??
"
His crayonic scrawlings do exude the stench of cheap propaganda. Credit where due, the guy can color inside the lines. Just he exhibits cerebral jaundice, a shallow depth of ability to critical thinking. His cartoons unsurprisingly display cartoonish world view.
I did wondered that myself. Won't conjecture on it though, not worth it the risk to getting from this site kicked.
Must have some good reason and I am not enough smart to know.
never fucking mind
Just think what would've happened if they violated Turkish waters...
These two boats were sent on the 11'th hour to derail the agreement of the Neuclear deal. Guess what ! It failed.
They don't need nukes, they already have the anti gravity technology and related weapons handed to them by keshefoundation.org as of 2008.
Check it out and ask your Representative as why we do not use it.
We were also given the know how in November 2012.
OK, let me see if I can explain it to you. First, the United States is a proxy Zionist state run directly out of the Council on Foreign Relations. Second, the pivot to Iran via the nuclear treaty and this faux paper tiger event is an indication that the United States will not intevene in the Middle East. This whole charade for many years has been to destabilize the Middle East including Iraq, Libya Egypt, and Syria. The next goal of the Zionist CFR is to start a war between Shiite Iran and Wahhabi Saudi Arabia. No one has much love loss for the Wahhabi Saudis who have been screwing the American peope via Opec for decades. However, this foray towards creating a war for the Zionist controlled United States hegemony over the Middle East between these two power, not unlike the Iran-Iraq war, might be ill-advised. I could explain more, but I am out of time for now. You will need to figure the rest out on your own. Godspeed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUCwCgthp_E&index=11&list=WL
Oh and btw, Xi is headed over to try to stop this war.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3400959/Chinas-Xi-visit...
They got the Magrav tech and shut down the boats.
That's Bait.
Tyler to America: Fuck Yeah
"US treatment of native Americans in hte century or more after independence bore all the hallmarks of what we call today ethnic cleansing.....In the 20th century there have been 180 instances of the use of US armed forces abroad in situations of military conflict or potential conflict..." Stephen Burman
The State of the American Empire: How the USA Shapes the WorldHey, not our fault they failed to develop a written language capable of sustaining a viable civilization. Guys wearing rags and feathers living next door to guys who can build factories is never going to work out for the former. It would happen regardless whether the advanced society were peaceful hippies or genocidal maniacs.
"Guys wearing rags and feathers living next door to guys who can build factories is never going to work out for the former."
Well the USSA has the rags and feathers covered... Now,,, who has the factories....
Your are correct.
Too true. See you on the reservation!
Shame the US doesn't still build factories that actually make stuff - instead of just giant techie sheds full of nerds and hipsters trying to persuade us the future is in loss-making fantasy companies.
At least the Injuns traded something useful like furs ina sustainable way.
I get what you mean but I don't think they actually managed to sustain it. So something went wrong for them in that regard.
They were "sustaining" just fine. They just hadn't had an agricultural revolution, and therefore industrial revolution, and therefore weapons revolution, so they couldn't muster enough soldiers or firepower.
Maybe, but from what I have read it appears that many of the North Native Americans had societies that had a lot more individual freedom.
And the Central Americans did have books, but the Europeans burned them. Hitler didn't invent book burning; he just adopted it.
Where are the dogs and the orange burka's?
Ramirez's political proclivites are well known. However, in this case, I think Butt Boy and Ketchup Boy may have actually upped their game to a heretofore unseen respectable level.
Iran isn't the problem despite the MSM rhetoric. The House of Saud is the problem. Iran wasn't involved in 9/11 - and neither was Iraq or Afganistan - the hijackers were Saudis. Iran isn't where ISIS is coming from. That would be Saudi Arabia and Turkey, trained and armed.
The MSM spins the Iran is bad thing because Iran is the House of Sauds natural born enemy going back a thousand years to the split of Islam. Sunni and Shite. And we backed the House of Saud because they had oil and it was in an easy to control region, unlike Iran which is surrounded by big name bnation-states like Pakistan, China, and Russia. So we backed the House of Saud, which is a kingdom and the farthest thing from a democracy, bought their oil on the cheap, sold them weapens, and they bought our USTs.
That's it. That's the story. Don't believe the MSM.
MSM wants us to believe 9/11 was Saudis too.
Well it was, and that info came out years later - on the MSM at least, you and I knew it was Saudi trained men from right away.
And if you are refering to a rouge network, a shadow government, then yes you are correct there too. But the House of Saud is involved in that rouge network, mind you.
Well, at least with a rouge network, all those rogues will have nice pink cheeks.
Silverstein doesn't sound very Saudi.
Depends on if you believe the stories about the House of Saud's lineage.
TeamD... THAT is a good one !
Pull it!... bingo